Why combat troops? Why not send a construction outfit such as an engineer battalion if it has to be military? Why not do what the government usually does and contract with a construction company to build the treatment units? "Additional thousands of troops" results in a very large inexperienced construction crew for 17 treatment units. It doesn't make sense.
Stories that don't make sense and that are not explained naturally arouse suspicions, such as: Are US soldiers being used to test ebola vaccines and cures, or more darkly are they being used to bring more ebola back to the US?
I understand why people ask these questions. The fact that they will receive no investigative answer will deepen suspicions.
Uninformed and gullible Americans will respond: "The US government would never use its own soldiers and its own citizens as guinea pigs." Before making a fool of yourself, take a moment to recall the many experiments the US government has conducted on American soldiers and citizens. For example, search online for "unethical human experimentation in the United States" or "human radiation experiments," and you will find that federal agencies such as the Department of Defense and Atomic Energy Commission have: exposed US soldiers and prisoners to high levels of radiation; irradiated the testicles of males and tested for birth defects (high rate resulted); irradiated the heads of children; fed radioactive material to mentally disabled children.
Comment: While the claims sound appalling and unbelievable, there is plenty of evidence that the US government has no qualms about using its citizens as guinea pigs:
The true story behind the appalling Tuskegee syphilis experiment
Government Experiments on U.S. Soldiers: Shocking Claims Come to Light in New Court Case
The Obama regime's opposition to quarantine for those arriving from West Africa is also a mystery. The US Army has announced that the Army intends to quarantine every US soldier returning from deployment in Liberia. The Army sensibly says that an abundance of caution is required in order to minimize the risk of transferring the ebola outbreak to the US. However, the White House has not endorsed the Army's decision, and the White House has expressed opposition to the quarantines ordered by the governors of New York and New Jersey.
Apparently pressure from the White House and threats of law suits from those subject to quarantine have caused the two states to loosen their quarantines. A nurse returning from treating ebola patients in West Africa has been cleared by New Jersey for discharge after being symptom-free for 24 hours instead of the 21-days it takes for the disease to produce symptoms. The nurse threatened a lawsuit, and the false issue of "discrimination against health care workers" has arisen. How is it discrimination to quarantine those with the greatest exposure to ebola?
Once symptoms appear, an infected person is dangerous to others until the person is quarantined. As the CDC now has been forced to admit, after stupidly denying the obvious fact, the current ebola strain can spread by air. All it takes is a sneeze or a cough or a contaminated surface.
In other words, it can spread like flu. Previous denials of this fact helped to create
the suspicion that the new ebola strain is a weaponized biowarfare strain created by
US government labs in West Africa. As University of Illinois law professor Francis Boyle has revealed, Washington placed its biowarfare laboratories in African countries that did not sign the convention banning such experimentation. Washington's deviousness in evading the convention that the US government signed has produced another suspicion: Did the new ebola strain escape, perhaps via some lab mishap that infected lab workers, or was the strain deliberately released in order to test if it works?
The only intelligent and responsible policy is to stop all commercial flights to and from ebola areas. Health worker volunteers should be transported by military aircraft and should be required to undergo the necessary quarantine before being transported back to the US.
Why does the White House oppose the only responsible and intelligent policy? Why is Congress silent on the issue?
The resistance to a sane policy fosters the suspicions that the government or some conspiracy group intends to use ebola to declare martial law and herd the population or undesirable parts of it, into the FEMA camps that Halliburton was paid to construct (without the public ever being told the reason for the camps).
Comment: And that is exactly what many are already saying: Forced quarantine and isolation: This is what is going to happen if Ebola hits the U.S.
It is certainly strange that a government involved in long-term wars in the Middle East, the purpose of which is unclear to the public, and in fomenting conflict with both Russia and China, two countries armed with nuclear weapons, would so recklessly create more suspicions among the public of its motives, intentions, and competence.
Democracy requires that the public trust the government. Yet Washington does everything possible to destroy this trust and to present a picture of dysfunctional government with hidden and undeclared agendas.
Reader Comments
Now that the CDC have finally admitted the truth, that Ebola CAN be carried through the air via small droplets...
Perhaps it'll only take them six more months to realise that THIS is why the medics are dropping like flies...
Ebola is a LEVEL FOUR biological agent, and requires air-tight suits for the staff that are treating the infected. And as far as I can see in the pictures of the Ebola outbreak is LEVEL THREE at best.
"...And as far as I can see in the pictures of the Ebola outbreak is LEVEL THREE at best."
Should read...
"And as far as I can see in the pictures of the Ebola outbreak the equipment is LEVEL THREE at best."
The usual suspects pushing population reduction:
www.infowars.com/ngo-envisages-global-one-child-policy-pandemics-to-solve-overpopulation/
[Link]
Perhaps the boots are hitting the ground to loot the gold, platinum and diamond minds from the African continent? I seriously doubt goodwill has anything to do with this.
Ghana is full of gold and diamonds.. do you even know what you are talking about? There is actually a company named "West African Precious Metals" it really doesnt seem like it.. nor does your reply to "Well There IS Motive" doesn't make any sense either....If there is to be population decrease, why would the powers that be want to raise the birth rate?
P.S. there is actually a company named "West African Precious Metals"
West Africa has proven stocks of precious and semi precious stones and metals...
The 2005 share of world production from African soil was:
bauxite 9%;
aluminium 5%;
chromite 44%;
cobalt 57%;
copper 5%;
gold 21%;
iron ore 4%;
steel 2%;
lead (Pb) 3%;
manganese 39%;
zinc 2%
cement 4%
natural diamond 46%
graphite 2%
phosphate rock 31%
coal 5%
mineral fuels (including coal) & petroleum 13%; uranium 16%. (ALL OF WHICH ARE FOUND IN WEST AFRICAN NATIONS except uranium)
You obviously didn't check into anything. These resources have been around for decades.. The Chinese are extracting them right now... There have been television shows about mining in west africa... I don't understand why you say things authoritatively without any base knowledge of what you are even talking about.
You really make yourself seem like a legend in your own mind.... Have fun being disagreeable and a little ignorant...
"Make a living"!? there's another one everybody! "Make a Living" Those subliminal phrases used for population control propaganda Wow man this has all been a trip. Make a living. Living ,how to make one .No, that is grammatically incorrect
What is Living? To Live. Living ,that of being alive. So make an alive? No no make a Life? Wait now, this catch phrase insinuates that to Live is only possible if you produce currency and that just isn't so. Besides we can't make a living..oh, no I'm wrong, we can make a living by reproduction a living human.
To the P.O.S. that coined this phrase somewhere in the hmmm 1940's? I forgive you , cause I have to. Curious though, just how pissed was God when you had to go before Him?
Has anyone considered the possibility that maybe they want our military engaged elsewhere in order to proclaim martial law with their trauma-trained police goon army? (Insiders claim the military is against the cabal.)
I have noticed how with more outsiders coming in that it seems to be spreading because the same issues exist that caused it to spread in the first place: no one wants to lose their job or have to be apart from their family while they're dying.
And now they've got everyone in the US sufficiently distracted by the grand jury ruling in Ferguson, MO as it is slowly revealed to much of the younger generation which people in their lives actually care about black lives and which don't give a rat's ass.
What concerns me is that now that the news is no longer focusing on it, the virus can absolutely come back via the deployed soldiers since if Washington gets its way, they will be treated as regular passengers returning from West Africa. And since it's not in the public consciousness, as we have been trained not to focus on more than one pressing issue at a time, people who come back from West Africa and start feeling sick will assume it's simply because it's still flu season in the US.
The military came from the civilian world and still has ties there. Of course, they wouldn't want to desecrate their own people. You truly would have to be some sort of monster to feel completely comfortable doing that.