Via Ria Novosti:
Great question...how exactly did the Ebola virus get to West Africa from 3,500km away where it was first discovered in the Democratic Republic of the Congo?"US government agencies have a long history of carrying out allegedly defensive biological warfare research at labs in Liberia and Sierra Leone. This includes the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which is now the point agency for managing the Ebola spill-over into the US," Prof. Francis Boyle said.
"Why has the Obama administration dispatched troops to Liberia when they have no training to provide medical treatment to dying Africans? How did Zaire/Ebola get to West Africa from about 3,500km away from where it was first identified in 1976?"
"Why is the CDC not better-prepared for this emergency after the US government spent about $70 billion since the anthrax attacks of October 2001 to prepare for this exact contingency?" Boyle said.
Why isn't anyone else asking that question? That question should be asked by every talking head on every mainstream media outlet on repeat 500 times a day every day until it is answered. Of course, predictably, none of the Western establishment media puppets are asking any of the tough questions about Ebola.
Questions like what happens if a mosquito bites an infected person, then flies off and bites someone else. Can Ebola spread then? Bill Gates certainly seemed to think so when he was funding research into mosquitoes as vaccine deployment systems.
Aside from that, billions of dollars have been poured into the CDC over the years. Mac Slavo of SHTFPlan.com recently asked similar questions to those of Professor Boyle after CDC Head Dr. Thomas Frieden claimed that it was a protocol breach which led to the first ever diagnosis of Ebola caught within the U.S. in the case of the Dallas Hospital nurse who reportedly tested positive after caring for Patient Zero Thomas Duncan.
Duncan's nurse somehow contracted the deadly virus despite reportedly wearing all the requisite protective gear. In response, Director Frieden claimed it was a breach in protocol, despite Frieden's nearly continuous reassurances in the media leading up to the diagnosis that there was "rigorous protocol" in place to stop the disease both before and after Duncan brought it here.
Quite obviously the CDC's "rigorous protocol" has utterly failed. Now Frieden, a man who contradicted himself live on CNN as to how the virus is even spread, has once again changed his tune, responding that, "We have to rethink the way we address Ebola infection control."
Four decades and billions of dollars later and now the CDC has to rethink the whole darn thing, huh?
"The 2014 budget for the Centers for Disease Control is $6.6 billion," Slavo wrote. "What, exactly, have these people been doing since Ebola was first discovered nearly 40 years ago? You'd think for $6.6 billion a year we'd have already thought through the infection control protocols."
Yes. You would. (Unless, of course, the government is being intentionally evasive or dishonest about the way in which Ebola is spread...)
Back when Duncan first brought the virus with him to the U.S. from Liberia, Dr. Frieden repeatedly told the media almost on loop that he was "confident" that officials could stop Ebola from that point on, even claiming, "We will stop it in its tracks."
The CDC has yet to specify exactly what specific protocol was supposedly breached in the case of Duncan's nurse, but the virus has definitely not been stopped in its tracks. The alternative media is reporting the truth: that most U.S. hospitals are ill-equipped to safely handle Ebola patients and stop the virus from spreading.
Even though the CDC and the National Institutes of Health have both gone on record to say that any American hospital should be able to adequately and safely handle a deadly disease like Ebola, Duncan was the only patient not treated at one of the nation's hospitals with specialized units specifically designed for dealing with such a highly infectious disease, and he is the only one out of six patients treated for Ebola here who has died thus far.
Then again, the entire government response to Ebola in America has been like watching a bad scary movie from the start.
Ria Novosti isn't the first foreign news outlet to openly implicate the U.S. government in the 2014 West African Ebola outbreak, either. Dr. Cyril Broderick, Professor of Plant Pathology at the University of Liberia's College of Agriculture and Forestry, recently wrote the article, "Ebola, AIDS Manufactured by Western Pharmaceuticals, US DoD? Scientists Allege," in which he made the following five points out the outbreak:
When Western media outlets responded to this article and its points, they largely attempted to portray the people of these nations as woefully ignorant, but as Broderick himself points out, "African people are not ignorant and gullible, as is being implicated." I've written before about how large swaths of the West African population have believed and still believe this Ebola outbreak is a government conspiracy.1. Ebola is a genetically modified organism (GMO)
2. Ebola has a terrible history, and testing has been secretly taking place in Africa
3. Sites around Africa, and in West Africa, have over the years been set up for testing emerging diseases, especially Ebola
4. The need for legal action to obtain redress for damages incurred due to the perpetuation of injustice in the death, injury and trauma imposed on Liberians and other Africans by the Ebola and other disease agents
5. African leaders and African countries need to take the lead in defending babies, children, African women, African men, and the elderly. These citizens do not deserve to be used as guinea pigs!
Perhaps that's why such a massive 24/7 propaganda campaign has been launched there to inundate the population with the message first and foremost that, indeed, Ebola is real.
Then again, you won't hear about any of this in the mainstream press over here.
Source: Truthstream Media
. . . on the way to this post, but first the post:
I recently asked my supplier of nano-particle, true colloidal silver (which -is not- to be confused with the literal hundreds of wannabe ionic silver solutions whose silver, Ag, content precipitates out as bio-IN-active silver chloride, AgCl, within minutes of encountering blood serum) if any in-vitro challenge testing against Ebola was planned.
The terse answer was that only gov't i.e. military labs could handle level 3 and 4 pathogens. Ebola is a four amoung the fours.
So no, there won't be any in-vitro challange testing done by mere mortals out on civi-street.
The lab used for testing to date is seen at this [Link] .
This Ebola thing is a mess, obviously, and while there are things I might say that I'm almost certain are true, I cannot prove any of them to be so.
I wish that someone would ask the Cs the following questions:
- is true, nano-particle colloidal silver any effective agent against Ebola and its variants if administered orally, by nebulizer and/or by IV. If so, or substantially so, at what dosages and by which means at what points in the progression.
To this last I can hear them saying, "No dice, no lollipops . . . " but even so I am at a loss as to how one might go about researching such question
- after the Ag content has precipitated out of an ionic Ag solution is there a worthwhile homeopathic or Rife-life effect ongoing?
These are very direct questions that I am not sure after reading the Cs from Day One they can usefully answer without abridgement.
=======================
As to the funny thing that happened: I have been commenting here for years on end and during the time it took to write this post the site went down, that has never happened before . . . I found that -highly- coincidental . . .
It was altogether too weird to watch my post slip away into the 404/522/whatever/ no-go zone.
And in the time it took to re-write off-line in Notepad the site came back up . . .