LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK AND JOE QUINN
Since the 9/11 attacks, no book has provided a satisfactory answer as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately responsible for carrying them out - until now.
strikes at the core of things... something the author of the article and the harvard researchers don't have much stomach for... too 'personal'...
well put, senor, and apt questions for anyone willing to cut through the headwork and take stock of what we have the capacity to 'see' as all kids do; those who've yet to learn of clever adult distinctions ;)
Perhaps the children see their corporeal bodies as mere vessels of their personalities, with the eyes being the only outward physical expression of who they really are. They have not yet learned the vanity of the flesh that convinces us that we are our bodies.
One cannot deny that we exist in a Universe based in duality. I think that is a point that has been well established.
Everything has its antithesis, even science. In a reality that is, at least seemingly, based on the positive/negative balance, to discount one half of the equation is to negate the other.
I think that the Heisenberg Principle is an attempt to explain certain metaphysical aspects of the human psyche.
This is a very interesting study. One hopes it was reported accurately.
The notion that a child tends to retain an awareness of its spiritual identity for a few years after birth seems ridiculous, yet it is plausible to me. It aligns with Ian Stevenson's work, for example. It also explains the behavior of "Boriska" who as a boy spoke from the identity he held previously until it became too socially embarrassing for him, at which point he stopped.
Though it may not be real to many readers, if you can imagine being a bodiless being, a simple cause point, and not emitting anything, then no one would be able to see you. The only way a being can "look" is by sending out a beam. But by so doing, that being also becomes visible. It is a very basic spiritual action.
To block one's eyes is to symbolically stop looking. The child, more or less totally into creating its own reality, would be quite satisfied that, as a game, ceasing to look would render one invisible. After all, it's just a game, isn't it?
before the headwork which spurned on the article above, or the theories laid atop it, the childlike wonder which is before distinctions, theories, explanations...
check it out.
Afterlife or hyperdimensional bleedthrough? A matter of choice in whether to be seen or not? To see or not? Seems it takes them a while to learn our ways or 'seeing'. Is it all children or those of a certain type that share this propensity?/