LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK AND JOE QUINN
Since the 9/11 attacks, no book has provided a satisfactory answer as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately responsible for carrying them out - until now.
They wrote: " They reported in two related papers in the University of Leicester Journal of Special Physical Topics that it would require 800 trillion terajoules of energy to split the asteroid in two with both pieces clearing the planet. Unfortunately, the largest nuclear bomb known, a Russian monster known as Big Ivan, yields only 418,000 joules. Hence, they said, the project would require a bomb a billion times as powerful to save the Earth."
OK, so a trillion is 10e12 and a terajoule is 10e12joules; so, 800 trillion terajoules is 8 x 10e26 joules.
Now, 418,000 joules is 4.18 x 10e5 joules; a billion is 10e9so a billion times Big Ivan is 4.18 x 10e14 and 10e14 is A LOT smaller than 10e26 so somebdy
(Who -put- that "Enter" key right over there anyway ? ?)
Now, 418,000 joules is 4.18 x 10e5 joules; a billion is 10e9 so a billion times Big Ivan is 4.18 x 10e14 and 10e14 is A LOT smaller than 10e26 so somebody is pretty much asleep at the switch somewhere along the line.
I never was a big B. Willis fan anyway . . .
There have been studies done as to the possibility of hitting an asteroid with a nuclear device with the aim of deflecting its path away from earth. One study was done in spring 1967 in anticipation of the close flyby of asteroid Icarus in June 1968( see the book "Rain of Iron and Ice", page 76). It was found to be possible, but the powers that be are more interested in spending billions in raping the earth and waging endless wars.
So that the LA times brings this article is more of distraction, so as to say to people: "Look there is nothing that can be done about it, it is only in films that it is possible", and the sheeple will go back to sleep instead of confronting its psychopathic selfserving masters. Sad state of affairs.
You are correct, my friend. They don't want anyone to believe that it is possible.
"the group of four students concluded that we simply don't have a big enough bomb to split the asteroid so that the two halves would pass by the Earth."
Neither did the Soviets have a device anywhere near 100 Megatons yieldpoint 4 months before they designed, built, and eventually detonated a 50 Megaton device.
That detonation scared the living crap out of the world, and is the turning point that got arms limitation talks and treaties going.
The device known as Tsar Bomba, detonated in 30 October 1961, was to prove that yield is only limited by the amount of fuel available to the device. So, given that Big Ivan only yielded 418000 joules, that is not to say that achieving the yield necessary to split an asteroid is impossible, only that it would be improbably difficult. It could be done. There is no physics that says it cannot be yielded. The designer of Tsar Bomba, one Andrei Sakharov, stands as the NULL testament to this fact. That bomb was limited to 1/2 it's original spec due to problems with fallout projections.
Getting it up there and into a position to do the intended job is another matter of logistics.
Comment: Reading Celestial Intentions Through the Wrong End of the Telescope: Missiles, UFOs and the Cold War