SOTT Focus:

Spectacular Russian rocket launch - more evidence of comet dust loading our atmosphere

Niall Bradley
Sott.net
Mon, 07 Mar 2011 04:28 UTC

Earlier today SOTT posted this video of a rocket launch cum 'UFO spiral'. The person who uploaded it to YouTube managed to convince him or herself that the spectacular display was the result of UFOs "taking over control of the rocket" once it reached a certain altitude. Well I've since located other videos of the launch minus the misleading text and the "blinking lights" (which appear to have been added later for effect, if not for outright disinformation purposes). Here is a YouTube video entitled 'Launch of the Soyuz 2 rocket carrying Glonass-K satellite':

No blinking lights surrounding the rocket and no text to tell you it's aliens from another planet taking remote control of it either.

Here's another video of the launch, this time amateur footage taken from another location. At around 2:04', its exhaust trail begins to light up:

I'm sorry to disappoint the True Believers out there but that is not an "Alien Sky Torch"! Which is not to say that UFOs don't have a history of buzzing rocket silos and military installations and that high strangeness could well take place in and around rocket launches. But I think you can see by comparing the doctored 'UFO Spiral' version of the rocket launch with the above two that someone is trying to distract us from something of far greater import.

The C's said in the February 13, 2011 session:

Q: (Perceval) The thing that we thought was a comet over Kazakhstan, was it a rocket from the Russians as reported?

A: No.

Q: (Perceval) Was it a comet?

A: Yes.

Q: (Perceval) It looked like a comet from what we know about comets.

A: Fragment. Expect a lot of the "rocket launch" excuses. If it was really a "rocket launch" they would have been able to announce it in advance.

I think in this case we can be pretty sure that the display we're seeing is actually from a Russian rocket launch. The following is Russian news footage from February 26th showing the launch from northern Russia.

In any event, the launch was announced in advance.

Recall the buzz generated by the appearance of this spiral in late 2009, filmed off the coast of northern Norway:

It turned out to be a failed Russian Navy missile test. Not a wormhole. Not a UFO spiral. And definitely not an Alien Sky Torch!

The following footage was filmed over Sensey, Kazakhstan on June 30, 2009. I still haven't made up my mind just what it was, but it's pretty similar to the latest launch video:

And here's an awesome display of what likely is cometary debris entering the atmosphere in late January this year:

Not easy to tell them apart, is it? If I'm on the right track here, then it means SOTT also got this one wrong when we posted an earlier video of the Glonass K-1 launch late last week and gave it the headline 'Comet Spiral Russia'.

Besides the spectacular displays these objects produce upon contact with our rapidly shrinking and cooling upper atmosphere, the similarity of the trail left behind by the February 26 Russian Glonass-K1 rocket (top photo above) with those of other rocket launches is note-worthy:

What I'm getting at is this: in all cases - be they rocket launches or cometary arrivals - the amazing displays they're producing in the sky are telling us something about the change of its composition. Laura Knight-Jadczyk wrote recently about the smokescreen of chemtrails, most of which are not chemtrails at all; the suspension of jets' contrails in the atmosphere are another sign telling us that the very sky itself is changing.

Don't believe me? Take a look at this report of "two suns" appearing in China over the weekend:

No, it's not 'Nibiru' or any other celestial body; we'd have felt it coming long before now if that were the case! I've heard some suggest that it's a kind of 'sundog' which forms when sunlight refracts through ice crystals and produces striking halo effects. This is what a sun halo and accompanying sundogs at 22^o looks like in its full glory (photo taken in Stockholm in early December 2010):

It's not an exclusively winter phenomenon. This was taken from Bournemouth in southern England in July 2010:

No, I think the "two suns" is a 'mirage' effect of some sort whereby the sun is being refracted by the changed atmosphere. That is, a combination of possible comet dust loading and changes in the layers of the atmosphere is producing all sorts of anomalous phenomena.

Whatever about 'sundogs', when have "two suns" ever been reported before? This is very strong evidence for major changes in the atmosphere and the question you've got to be asking yourself is, why?

Further reading:

Comets and Catastrophe Series

Cosmic Climate Change is Underway

Niall Bradley

A contributing writer at SOTT.net, Niall Bradley's articles are cross-posted on his personal blog, NiallBradley.net. Niall is co-host with Joe Quinn of NewsReal, and co-author of Manufactured Terror: The Boston Marathon Bombings, Sandy Hook, Aurora Shooting and Other False-Flag Terror Attacks.

Reader Comments

sublmnlcrimnl · 2011-03-07T17:07:29Z

Comet Elenin

[Link]

Take a look at the close approach data!!!

unit e · 2011-03-07T17:32:56Z

So, on What Basis...

have you determined that the Kazakistan video from late January this year " is likely cometary debris entering the atmosphere"? Yes it does look very similar to this verifiable rocket launch, as does the June 30, 2009 video. Moreover, at 30 seconds on the 2009 video it looks to me that what we see is a separation of rocket stages. Now the "Cs" tell us that this was a comet, not a rocket launch. So perhaps there's another important question we should be asking.

Woodsman · 2011-03-07T20:52:25Z

Nice redux!

Now this is the kind of reporting I value around here!

Lots of data and examination while remaining open to all possibilities, but without letting emotions and wishful thinking cloud judgment.

Thanks so much for putting this together, Kniall.

--So, now I'm thinking that we might be in the middle of a manipulation.

It works like this: Post a big bogus story about UFOs transforming Russian missiles into alien "Sky torches", claims which will quickly be dismantled by all but the most bottom rung of YouTube viewers. The clever debunkers will then go forth with all such images categorized in their minds as being, "Just another rocket launch"; they will not look more closely. That's the trick of it; make the data you want to program into people appear only as incidental to the supposed headline. (If you want to sell running shoes, you don't ever make the shoes the focus, you make the uber-cool Rap star the focus and just let the shoes wander nonchalantly into the shot.)

As for which is which. . .

I think the trick to discernment is that rockets go up and comets come down; meaning that there is a reverse sequence in the display; the ghostly film of light spread happens first with the comet and then it turns into a smoking trail behind a fireball as it penetrates deeper into more dense atmosphere, and then it either lands or fizzles out upon descent. Rockets appear to do the opposite.

deej · 2011-03-07T22:32:56Z

Don't forget McCanney

I've been listening to McCanney's archived radio broadcasts and I think his work might be useful in helping us figure out at least a part of what's happening.

His work on weather - hurricanes and tornadoes and storms may well apply here. If I understand what he's saying, the rockets going up (or comet pieces coming down) are likely to open an ion channel between the ground and the highly energetic ionized upper layers of the atmosphere. Basically, the electrical energy generated by the sun (protons) is loading up the earth's ionosphere and must eventually get grounded to earth. Storms do this naturally, rockets or space debris also can create that opening for an energetic ion flow to earth.

Perhaps what we're seeing is the ion plasma lighting up.

I'm not well read on McCanney yet, nor am I well versed in physics in general so take this explanation with a big grain of salt - still, it does give food for thought, eh?

Appollynon · 2011-03-08T06:30:41Z

Great article Niall

Thank you for connecting these dots Niall, your work here has helped me to dispence a few "sacred cows" I was allowing to graze and create lots of mooing noise ;o)

Third_Density_Learner · 2011-03-08T07:55:00Z

Halo

The second picture of the ring around the sun in England is a halo, and has nothing whatsoever to do with the Sun Dog effect seen in the photo taken in Stockholm. Halos around the sun during the day are actually rather common all over the world at any time of year; they form when cirrus or cirrostratus cloud is present.

I look forward to a rigorous, scientific mechanism which can explain how the supposedly changed composition of the atmosphere can cause all manner of increased phenomena such as more contrails and more mirages. I'm not saying this is not happening, just that I've yet to see a convincing mechanism that explains it. It's very easy to wave one's hands around and proclaim vaguely that "such-and-such is changing, which is why we are seeing more and more of such-and-such". Anecdotes of various hydrometeoric and photometeoric phenomena is not sufficient evidence to claim that the atmosphere has changed.

Woodsman · 2011-03-08T11:38:54Z

Here's a possible route of easy-ish exploration to test the theory of atmospheric changes which struck me while reading your post. . .

We can take some of those images of colorful 'dragon' tails left after rocket launches and compare them to images of rocket launches from several decades ago. This would offer comparative images as well as public access to the tech specs of the rockets and fuels being used at various times.

This would provide enough information to form a decent comparison. If nothing has changed, then we know something. If the sky is behaving differently with similar or identical stimulus, then we know something else.

Niall · 2011-03-08T12:55:10Z

I stand corrected. It's a 'sun halo.'

But tell me, if it's so everyday boring normal, why are these people agog at the sight of one? [Link]

kidkip · 2011-03-08T09:04:37Z

Hey Kniall

think you need a spell check there - should be Denial. You point us to a 4.20 version of the launch sequence which just happens to skip the bit with the funny lights - then you point us to another version apparently shot by drunken Russians or people pretending to be drunken Russians where the camera is mostly somewhere else. Smells a bit ratlike to me and I wonder just who actually pays your way. Well get plenty of sleep Mr/Ms Kniall because you are about to be confronted by events of considerable magnitude and your ability to please your masters will be taxed to the limit. Keep the pencil sharp - its not long off now.

RyanX · 2011-03-08T10:41:51Z

Was that a veiled threat you just wrote? Cause that's what it sounds like to me.

Shane · 2011-03-08T10:51:04Z

Perhaps you're a Chem-trail crusader, a Disclosure devotee, or maybe a Nibiru fiend? This idea of changes occurring in the atmosphere sure has people crawling out of the woodwork. Did you read the entire article? Your reasoning is weak when compared to all the information presented. Check out the links too, particularly the further reading. There are some incredible things going on in our sky and the evidence is mounting that it has to do with cometary debris rather than the various fantasies being promoted around the net. Fact is no one is talking about this other than SOTT. If this idea was paid disinformation you can be sure it would be spread far and wide. It's not, and if you're aware of how disinformation works that should tell you something. Instead names are thrown and weak, vague claims are made. That says a lot as well.

Niall · 2011-03-08T12:46:07Z

You've been commenting on Sott for a year kidkip.

You have exactly one chance to explain what you're talking about.

Noise · 2011-03-08T11:30:53Z

Thanks Niall,

That was very interesting. Good range of topics/disinfo to weigh through. The logic brings a clearer perspective. I'm with Appollynon on the sacred cow dispensements.

@kidkip, Not all Russians are Drunken. Video footage from a persons youtube account doesn't mean it's editing out anything - being the footage provided is as is. Are you at all conscious of what your saying/doing in the grand scheme of things? What you are and doing is pretty blatantly obvious. ...

umuekempi · 2011-03-09T10:55:23Z

cosmic race revolution

There is need for earth dweller to know the Bio - effect micro wave radiation coming out of cosmic micro wave radiation background of Atlantic ocean current motion in air form central core fluid intelligent support system atmosphere .

Danny · 2011-03-09T11:47:13Z

Just an observation...

Upon watching the first "clip" of the rocket launch it appears quite obvious that it is 2 clips...at 1:25 it is a totally different shot. It isn't even REMOTELY the same footage. So that piece of "evidence" is null and void.

Zote · 2011-03-09T11:52:50Z

thank you

I see videos of rocket launches all the time being explained as HAARP, UFOs, comets, etc... when they are obviously rockets.

How to know if something is a rocket:

look for stage separations
can leave tangled exhaust plume which may be lit by sun even at night
rapid growth of plume size as rocket gets close to the edge of atmosphere
disappearance of majority of rocket plume once craft leaves atmosphere but rocket incandessence still visible

Absolutely no money laundering going on here....

DeliciousTears

Standup comedy. He's got a substantial repertoire of Russky jokes.

boli

Pretty much my whole life, I've told people overseas that I'm not "American", I'm from Texas, and that Texas is not actually part of the U.S....

boli

Insurance based on innuendo, great policy.

JTF Truth

Are the kangaroos still running loose?

JTF Truth

SOTT Focus:

Spectacular Russian rocket launch - more evidence of comet dust loading our atmosphere

Reader Comments

Latest News

Picture of the Day

Quote of the Day

Recent Comments

Quantum Quirk