LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK AND JOE QUINN
Since the 9/11 attacks, no book has provided a satisfactory answer as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately responsible for carrying them out - until now.
There is also a beauty in the symmetry of it. although it wouldn't be beautiful if you were actually experiencing it
Is that an aspect of the programming or the attemptive look at a thermal event as described?
Quite a shocking, revelatory, and yet inspiring piece of good science. It makes me suddenly wonder about the mountainous terrain of my homeland Scotland, and all those vitrified forts, and also ranges of hills and mountains close to home such as the Pennines, which are often said to be the backbone of England. This also explains a lot more about all those uplifted areas around the globe which have not as yet been adequately explained by the "accepted norms" of all the bad science of tectonic movement out there. Also pretty humbling considering what's heading our way!
Keep in mind that the simulation is a cross-section of the down-blast, and resulting airburst vortex. So, post impact, we see a series of toroidal vortices stacked around the rising impact plume.
The rotation speeds you see there are supersonic.
The colors are graded by temperature. White = 5800 K; Red = 2000 K.
Dr Boslough’s statement that: “Simulations suggest strong coupling of thermal radiation to the ground, and efficient ablation of the resulting melt by the high-velocity shear flow.” would seem to be spot on, from where I sit.
Dennis Cox
Mark Bosloughs's simulations only depict a single, lone bolide.
But if we look at images of comets like Linear, or SW-3 we see the potential for a different kind of catastrophe. The typical kinds of fragile, and fragmented, objects we see in the Taurid complex would seem to imply that a large cluster of smaller fragments is a far more likely catastrophic impact scenario than a single large bolide.
So let's connect a couple of dots. What if a large cluster of fragments like comets Linear, or SW -3 did hit? At say, 30 km/s. And at a fairly low angle. What do we expect to happen when only the first fragments on the leading edge of the cluster fall into cold atmosphere, and the rest fall into the impact plasma of the fragments falling only a few dozen feet ahead of them, and just crank up the heat, and pressure?
The model of the Taurid Complex provided by Clube, and Napier, describes the very high probability that the impacts of the Taurid Progenitor arrived that way.
And the mountain you see above is not alone. It is in the middle of more than 50,000 square miles of such materials. And it is all in eqully pristine condition.
"What if a large cluster of fragments like comets Linear, or SW -3 did hit?"
Hits must generate electromagnetic disturbances as well, because of comet metal content and lightning tornado-like effects. Would a cometary bombardment also cause cracks in dimensional curtains, causing collapse of the density barrier locally?
How many impacts are needed for the density barrier to collapse entirely - counting in human creative energy / life force release - blasting the whole planet into 4thD?
Actually the mountain was formed by a rebound from the impact of the shockwave by a process similar to the formation of the central uplift in a complex crater. The upwards flow that formed the impact plume only stripped, and ablated, the materials of its outer surface as it 'bounced' up into the updrafter.
Another example of the same kind of geomorphology that's not in as pristine condition can be found to the north of ther at the Sierra Madera Cryptoexplosion Structure in Southwest Texas. [Link]
The vacuum doesn't cause the uplift at the center.
The simulations suggest that the mountain formed as a kind of kinetic rebound effect, similar to the effect that creates the central uplift in a normal crater. But since all of the energy of the fragment gets translated into heat, and pressure, in the atmosphere, and there is no longer a solid object left at the instant of impact. The shock is spread out over a broader area, and the impact happens without making a crater. The surface gets momentarily depressed downwards at the instant of impact. And as the surface rebounds from the impact shockwave, it creates an uplifted structure called a 'Cuesta', like the mountain you see there.
It would probably be correct to say the mountain 'bounced up'. In that respect, it's like a wave in a storm tossed sea; it's motions frozen in time.
As the updraft forms at the center of the vortex, and above the uplifted Cuesta, the mountain gets ablated, the upwards flow forming the deep 'V' shaped excavations that get wider at the top, and center of the flow. This happens simultaneously with the formation of the ejecta curtain. But the ablated material from the center goes up into an impact plume. And is thrown back along the entry path of the exploding fragment.
So that "hole" you're talking about gets filled with hot, vaporized rock. And you do not want to be under the fiery rain as it precipitates, and falls back to Earth.
Dennis
Incredible work Dennis and thanks for allowing the mirroring by the SOTT team here and helping to further educate the site readers like myself. The process you have described sounded to me, similar to the effects of blowing onto the surface of water, where the water surface at the point of the air pressure impact does not break, but simply pushes down creating smaller ripples around the area, and then rebounds up creating the wider ripples. Only when you blow harder, are you sometimes splashed with the water rebounding up at the your mouth, the source of the air pressure. Thank you, that makes this process a lot clearer and easier to understand :o)
It struck me that while many of us have been hunting around looking for crater impacts as a tell tale sign of any cometary type bombardments in our past, that there is likely just as much evidence, if not more, of such cometary visitors and their affects if we take a closer look at many similar geo-oblative terrains, such as you have found in surprising numbers in Mexico. My mind is still being boggled by your work ;o)
so wild...it has it's own beauty. Somehow, all these Earth changes coming and happening now have me stoked, I don't know why.
Once more, the myth of uniformitarianism is laid to rest.
And the uniformitarian Paradigm.
The old clichés like ‘buying a pig in poke’, ‘don’t let the cat out of the bag’, and ‘empty sack of lies’ all have their roots in the same old con. It went something like this: At an old country fair, a con artist would approach a likely looking mark to sell him a piglet in a ‘poke’ bag. But it’s not really a pig in the bag; it’s a cat. The cat wiggles, and squirms, just like a little pig when you poke him through the bag. And as long as the bag stays closed, the con works just fine. But as soon as the bag is opened, the cat escapes. And the victim is left holding nothing but an empty sack of lies.
The Earth Sciences are founded on the unquestioned 19th century assumptions of Sir Charles Lyell. Namely, the assumptions of gradual, uniform, geologic change. And the foundation principle that ‘the present is the key to understanding the past’. Churches, governments, and big institutions, loved it. They bought it like a pig in a poke. And they bought with generous funding packages. And with rules that shut the door to any publication, or consideration, of sudden catastrophic events, as a driving force in the geo-morphology of this world for more than 150 years. That’s a cruelly long time time to leave the poor kitty in a bag.
But the questions of just what the hell happened around 13,000 years ago that caused the extinctions of the mega fauna in North America, the disappearance of the Clovis culture, and a return to Ice age conditions that lasted more than a thousand years, has caused us to take a closer look, and I’m afraid we’ve let the cat out of the bag.
We are clearly on the cusp of a major paradigm shift in the Earth Sciences as far reaching as the realization that the world isn’t flat. But, while standard uniformitarian geology may appear to some to be a dead horse walking, it isn’t. Any new model for the surface terrains of this world that opens the door to consideration of occasional impact related catastrophe as a major driving force in the geomorphology of the terrains of this world is incomplete without a gradual change, ’steady state’ component. Gradualism works pretty good as long as nothing sudden happens.
Dragon/Mr. Cox:
Great article and I LOVE the:
truly "quotable quote"
that ends your note.
About a pig in a poke:
"Gradualism works pretty good as long as nothing sudden happens."
Beauteous.
R.C.
This is my first comment on this site, as after a few years of following, I finally signed up.
Appollynon, I have found all of your comments on many of the articles in this site very thoughtful and enlightning. I thoroughly enjoy reading your comments.
In your first comment to this article and other comments you have made in other articles, you speak of "what is to coming our way"
Could you enlighten me? what excactly is coming our way?
As my baseball playing father would have said, “I’ll try to field that one:”
Comment: Tunguska, Psychopathy and the Sixth Extinction at
[Link]OR
The Golden Age, Psychopathy and the Sixth Extinction at
[Link]
Of course, I defer to Appollynon, who alone knows best what he meant. Indeed, if he knows more than those, I'm all ears. (In the meantime, just trying to help spread some honest searches for truth around.)
I do find VERY interesting the large number of comments that this article has so quickly received, particularly from those who tend (IMHO) to be the wiser of the SOTT commentators*, (which, as a group overall, are, far “wiser than your average bears” posting comments anywhere else I’ve ever read.)
R.C.
* A/k/a, what I refer to as prototypical “SOTT Type Folks.”
RC
Welcome Calypto, from a fellow newbie also behind in his reading.
I would imagine more of the above, as that example is fairly recent.
From what i've read so far, impact events come in cycles depending on our position in the cosmos.
These airburst cluster events certainly do look more scary than single impacts.
It's quite sad that that does, pretty much sum up my knowledge on the subject. I'll certainly be looking at your website Dennis. Thanks for the great work.
Anyone any idea when the next one is coming?
jeff
As I've mentioned before, fireballs caught my attention a couple of years ago, and I've been trqacking them ever since. I use the data from The American Meteor Society ( [Link]) complied since 2005.
In 2005, the average number of fireballs reported over the US was 1.28 per day, 38.83 per month. So far as my researches have revealed, the 1.28 per day was relatively steady for many decades.
As of 18 September 2012, the average has shot up to 5.13 per day, 156.4 per month. When you plot the curve it is frighteningly steep. The numbers for the years are:
2005 1.28/day
2006 1.41/day
2007 1.61/day
2008 1.98/day
2009 1.90/day
2010 2.59/day
2011 4.46/day
2012 5.13/ day, so far
(I'd put the pdf file of the chart here, but I don't know how to embed it.)
I am coming to believe that the so-called "Mayan" (they really got from the Olmec, who got it from who knows where?) calendar is a countdown calendar created by the survivors of the Younger Dryas impact event to forewarn of the return of a dense cloud of cometary debris. If the Younger Dryas event was extended over a long enough period, those people may have worked out its exceedingly long orbital period and constructed the calendar as the only possible hope of forewarning the future.
The increase in the number of daily fireballs has added sufficient material to the upper atmosphere to majorly increase the frequency and extent of noctilucent clouds:
Anyone who’s ever seen a noctilucent cloud or “NLC” would agree: They look alien. The electric-blue ripples and pale tendrils of NLCs reaching across the night sky resemble something from another world.
Researchers say that’s not far off. A key ingredient for the mysterious clouds comes from outer space.
“We’ve detected bits of ‘meteor smoke’ imbedded in noctilucent clouds,” reports James Russell of Hampton University, principal investigator of NASA’s AIM mission to study the phenomenon. “This discovery supports the theory that meteor dust is the nucleating agent around which NLCs form.”
[Link]
I also am pretty certain that the increase has been a factor in the weird weather that has become more frequent of late: we're heating the bottom of the atmosphere, while the impacts are heating the upper atmosphere.
I really hope I'm wrong, but given the increasing frequency of ground strikes, I think we entering the leading edge of what will become a fireball storm of unknown length and intensity. I'm not sure if December marks the peak, or merely the true beginning of it, but I do know that bigger objects are coming by more frequently every day.
... have comparatively thin sheet of debris associated with it? like Saturn, and Jupiter. and for the same electro-magnetic (not gravitational) reason?
If so, then the Maya (or Olmec, or other) could have a very rational reason for ending their calander at an exact and precise moment in time – when we pass through the Galactic plane on 21/12/12.
If that is indeed when the solar system passes through from 'galactic south' to 'galactic north'. I have read different opinions of that and don't have an independent understanding of the astronomy of it myself.
It does make sort of intuitive sense that such a layer of debris might exist. Pretty much every other transitional boundary seems to collect stuff at its edges.
You've given me food for though, I'll have to do some research. If I find anything to substantiate it, I'll report back on it.
Wow