OF THE
TIMES
I've had enough of someone else's propaganda. I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against. I'm a human being first and foremost, and as such I am for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.
Comment: Let it be noted that the Houthi's actions are not indiscriminate. They have clearly defined what is a target and what is not. Any ship...
Elephant Seal in BC today, is RC fascinated? RC knows why he's on the other side, prematurely. ๐ [Link]
They're starting to 'eat their own'.......running scared, looking to see who will be the scapegoat since some lawsuits are starting to emerge....
This article seems a bit " homo-sapiens-centric " "Adoption of stone tools or fire, or intensive hunting techniques, are extremely flexible...
Sadly, the next time it will be the same. Most people will do whatever they are told, whatever the consequences. In a way, I think there are...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Who, pray tell, are these "Some?"
"SOME believe the mutilations are actually done by small animals or insects who eat away parts of the body but leave most intact."
HAR HAR! Oh, they AREN'T joking?
This does not fit with any of the thousands of cases of "perfect circular incisions" without bleeding, and usually - though the article makes no mention one way or another - completely exanguinated bodies with no disturbed ground around it. Any takers on a bet that the unmentioned cored/taken portion was from the anus or the genitalia? (That's the standard finding, although you won't find it in this pathetic piece of selective editing of facts which goes out of its way to omit most every relevant and material parts of the basic who, what, where, when, how and why.) Of course, one shouldn't expect such responsible reporting from an article that cites to such "somes" as if there really is a person who would put their name on THAT theory!
That painfully obvious selective editing is designed to ensure that your average MSM-Programmed American Idiot will resort to one of the many standard human (but more prevalent in idiots) psychological self-deception activities, (e.g., subconscious and conscious minds agree, "Well it's just unpleasant to think about, so we won't.")
R.C.