LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK AND JOE QUINN
Since the 9/11 attacks, no book has provided a satisfactory answer as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately responsible for carrying them out - until now.
· Riding the Wave: The Truth and Lies About 2012 and Global Transformation by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
No Kindle? Get the FREE Amazon Kindle Reader software for your computer, phone, or tablet!
| Current total: 194,061 € | Status: Level 2 |
This article makes me recall "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang" and the Candy Man (Trump). If we were an agrarian society this might makes sense but this idea will only become a sick and twisted slave trade in the future. How does this win somebody an election in 2012? I wonder who Gingrich's running mate will be. However, I think Romney will be the competitor and we know what the Mormons do to their children. Obama has my vote.
If this guy is serious, it goes to show how poor his reality is on how life really works.
Most "poor kids" have plenty of work experience. They work around the house to help out their parents, and if they are older they have probably done odd jobs of some kind or another at least. This is so NOT what makes the poor "unemployable!"
In terms of real-world experience, it is the very rich who are much more likely to go lacking. As kids, they don't need to work, and unless they or their parents are exceptional, they probably never do. For younger children there are often family servants to help look after them. And the older kids are often allowed to do as they please. If one gets drunk and crashes pop's car, his parents can afford to pay off the victims to keep them quiet.
On the other hand: Kids usually want to help out. Thus, preventing rich kids from working can make them seriously insane. And preventing other children from doing any "chores" or similar actions due to considerations of this being "mistreatment" is similarly ridiculous.
In the early days of manufacturing in Europe and America, children were taken advantage of as a source of cheap labor. Laws were passed to prevent this. But it still occurs. The big difference is not whether kids or working or not, but whether they are living in an environment of care and love, or one of abuse and neglect.
As for this man, I would definitely not trust him around kids or his opinions concerning kids. While his idea may not be moronic, his premise is totally so. It is the RICH kids who need a bigger dose of the "real world" not the poor!
The two examples cited above were the grandparent and parent paying the child, not a corporate or (worse?) bureaucratic boss. And who is to "police" all these kids (or adults supervising them) working at school after hours? The two janitors mentioned above "to handle the heavy/dangerous stuff" did not take their job to supervise 5 year olds.
The child labor laws are there to protect the kids, and if family or neighbors wish to pay them for chores or "jobs" that is fine but if we allow these laws to be abolished, the only result will be ABUSE.
Once these policies are implemented you can bet your a** there will be a provision for some corporate entity to contract out the over site of said slave... err .. part-time labor of children.
I'm not saying the union janitors are pedophiles by any means but you can count on more "Penn State" cases coming to light if this is implemented