OF THE
TIMES
"And does Iran Have a Nuke"... Iran didn't have ambition to build or "Have a Nuke". The enrichment program was part of their nuclear power program...
" The main question for Russia is : What does it want from Armenia going forward? Does it need Armenia as a key partner in the South Caucasus,...
A convenient excuse for the severe fuel and fertilizer shortage caused by the US / Israeli war ?
Iran stated nuclear weapons or nuclear bomb it will not have, it’s against there religion. Only degenerates or vile creatures of the night would...
If I read the opening correctly, the article says " Ninety-one Democrats supported the bill, a surprising number, and as did one Republican...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE

Hmmmm... I may be wrong, but is this not just another case of ‘bad astronomy’?
First of all, the direction of the light source (the sun) is surely suggesting that what is described as a 'big, shallow crater' is more like a vast raised escarpment.
Secondly the kind of features shown bear no resemblance to any form of impacting I have seen. What they do look like is the kind of features now regularly recognised by those who understand the results of extreme electrical or plasma discharging between planets – cosmic lightening scars in other words.
Anyone else got a view here?