Antiwar.com
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:56 EDT
The draft called on all nations to ratify the comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty and urged all the nations of the world to join the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
But the bill also singled out Iran for criticism, despite its lack of nuclear weapons and expressed support, for the time being, for the NPT allowing five nations, which not-so-coincidentally are also the five UN Security Council permanent members, to keep their nuclear arsenals.
Despite its lofty goal of an eventually nuclear-free planet, the resolution is bound to raise serious questions about the hypocrisy of the UNSC members, since several of them (including the US) voted less than a week ago to oppose a call for Israel to join the NPT. Israel has repeatedly ruled out joining the NPT, and reacted with outrage at the very suggestion.
Even if the call is sincere, it seems unlikely that most of the calls are going to get anywhere. Though the proposal was made by the US, they have yet to ratify the nuclear test ban treaty and there remains considerable opposition in both Congress and the Pentagon to considering it. If President Obama can't even sell the issue domestically it seems impossible that the UNSC move will be anything but rhetoric.























![Validate my Atom 1.0 feed [Valid Atom 1.0]](/images/valid-atom.png?1222505720)
![Validate my RSS 2.0 feed [Valid RSS 2.0]](/images/valid-rss.png?1222505756)






















Or perhaps that's just my point of view? It seems the rest of the flock is preparing to setup the Israeli wing of the party as scapegoats for slaughter. In any puppet show, sacrifices must be made and it seems every so slowly, the game pieces are being set and positioned just so.
But then, for the general public, that could be said about the rest of us as well.