Change?
Not really.
When Bill Clinton, "the man from Hope," took the White House one of the things he did not put on his agenda was a serious investigation into the vast criminal enterprise operated by George Bush, Sr. that went by the name Iran/Contra.
Bush Sr. who belonged in jail on many counts walked away scott free.
Since Clinton left the White House, it's obvious that he and Bush Sr. are the best of friends playing golf together and posing for numerous photo ops.
Is Obama going to go after the vast criminal enterprise Bush Jr. presided over?
The message is loud and clear. He will not.
What do you call the form of government where the chief executive can break serious laws repeatedly causing grave harm to the nation without consequences of any kind?
On the other hand, can Bush pardon himself in advance for murder? I don't think so.
Why a murder indictment against Bush is not only realistic, it's also advisable. Best of all, it won't require cooperation from the next occupant of the White House or the Congress.
How to indict Bush for murder
![]](/images/donate/pb_right.gif){kind=small}
![[Valid Atom 1.0]](/images/valid-atom.png?1222505720 "Validate my Atom 1.0 feed")
![[Valid RSS 2.0]](/images/valid-rss.png?1222505756 "Validate my RSS 2.0 feed")
'Lying for Empire - How to commit War Crimes with a straight face' by David Model. (Common Courage Press 2005)
Model lists the past eight US presidents with a chapter devoted to each giving a list of their war crimes and crimes against humanity. Clinton is Chapter 8. (Clinton kills civilians to save them). And let's not forget Madelaine Albright's psychopathic comment that 500,000 dead Iraqi children was 'a price worth paying'! Nice going, Bill!
Chapter 10: Psychopath Number 43, is most interesting. Based on Dr Robert D. Hare's checklist of psychopathic traits, George W. scores 32.