Clinton is just digging a bigger and bigger hole for herself as the days go by.

She's demolishing obama and herself so people have no other choice then to vote for mccain.

That's what happens when you pander to corruption, huge ego and ambition. Her hidden agendas are becoming apparent. Bill Clinton was a terrible president (he was more than happy to hand all of us and everything to "free market" forces). She would only be like her hubby! The faces would change but the power would remain in the same hands!

ALL 3 of the "choices" here are hand picked by a certain few elite.If you think there is actually ANY difference between them , then you've obviously mis-taken just about EVERYTHING that has been explained here.
Also this type of rhetoric should not comes as a shock or surprise to you.And you have bought into Olberrmann's ADL-esque tirade hook line and sinker.No matter how compassionate he may APPEAR, he still works for the most tainted of all professions...The American press.The same people who tell you that the Wars are OK- it was just the ludicrous way it was handled, or Israel has a right to protect itself from rock-throwing teens by any means neccesary, or that September 11,2001 was carried out by some Islamic extremists hiding in caves.
Yes, what he says may taste sweet and make you feel warm and fuzzy.But it is still all from the same Kool-aid container.

I agree with Danny. Olberman is a great presenter/talker and I enjoy his bits and passion, but in the end, he's also just playing the game on the surface.
Nothing changes unless we get to the root of the problem. Question is, would he ever talk so passionately about Psychopathy and Political Ponerology on mainstream TV, if he'd be aware of it? Probably not, it would cost him his job.

He too is caught in the tunnel vision most people live in here in the US, and that is,as the late comedian Bill Hicks has put it so eloquently: "Should I choose for the puppet on the left or the puppet on my right?". However, most people don't even see the strings attached.
Isn't the best way to control a nation to give them only two options, control both sides and give the people the illusion of choice?

Many hopeful souls are of the opinion that Obama, in a pinch, and given the opportunity, will work for his better angel. As for Hillary's remark, perhaps she has inside knowledge. Sad to say, but don't you suppose that she should know if there is to be an organized oposition to eliminate Barack?