sott.net





Featured Book:

Political Ponerology


SOTT Focus Listing

· SOTT Focus articles listed by author



Pentagon Strike logo
Over 1 BILLION Served!


Disease logo


Songs of the Times
Songs of the Times
MP3's!

Relic
Flower Kings
You Lied


Firefox 3
This site best viewed
with Mozilla Firefox

SuperSearch Help

 


Science Daily
Thu, 01 May 2008 19:03 EDT

Health & Wellness

The electromagnetic fields produced by incubators alter newborns' heart rates, reveals a small study published ahead of print in the Fetal and Neonatal Edition of Archives of Disease in Childhood. It is not clear what the long term effects might be, but this could have implications for babies born prematurely, who may spend several weeks or months in incubators, say the authors.

The research team assessed the variability in the heart rate of 43 newborn babies, none of whom was critically ill or premature.

The heart rates of 27 of these babies were assessed over three periods of five minutes each, during which the incubator motor was left running, then switched off, then left running again. To see if noise might be a factor, because incubators are noisy, 16 newborns were exposed to "background noise," by placing a tape beside the baby's head, while the incubator motor was switched off.

The tape recording, which reproduced the sound of the incubator fan, was played for five minutes, paused for five minutes, and then played again for five minutes.

There were no differences in heart rate variability in the tape recorded babies. But there were significant differences in the heart rate variability of babies in the incubators. The heart rate variability fell significantly during the periods when the incubator was switched on.

Decreased heart rate variability is a strong predictor of a poor prognosis in adult patients with heart disease and the general population, the evidence shows. Heart rate variability is made up of low and high frequency components, and the ratio between the two is higher in premature babies than it is in adults.

The authors suggest that this may be influenced by the powerful electromagnetic fields created by incubators.

They conclude that modifications to the design of incubators could help, but they add that as yet it is unclear what long term consequences there may be of exposure to electromagnetic fields at such a tender age.

"International recommendations and laws set levels to safeguard the health of workers exposed to electromagnetic fields: newborns should be worthy of similar protection," they say.

Adapted from materials provided by BMJ-British Medical Journal, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.

Discuss on SOTT Forum


Reader Comments
 
(Register to add your comments!)
 
Fritz Albert Popp Et Al By Paladin
Paladin

gave the answet to that one some years ago.
How thick is todays medical profession?


Added: Thu, 01 May 2008 19:53 EDT


 

Donate to Signs

Donate once - or every month! Click here to learn how you can help!

Have a question or comment about the Signs page? Discuss it on the Signs of the Times news forum with the Signs Team.

Emails sent to Signs of the Times, Ark, Laura, or Cassiopaea become the property of Quantum Future Group, Inc and may be republished without notice.

Some icons appearing on this site were taken from KDE-look.org, Afterglow, Mayosoft, Everaldo, IconDrawer, VisualPharm, IconFactory, Klukeart, Icons-land, and TpdkDesign.net
.

Remember, we need your help to collect information on what is going on in your part of the world!
Send your article suggestions to: SOTT e-mail address


Original content copyright 2008 by Signs of the Times. See: Fair Use Policy

149 people have viewed this page since Thu, 01 May 2008

ATOM Feed   RSS

[Valid Atom 1.0]   [Valid RSS 2.0]