OF THE
TIMES
Well written article. Quote:"The country's Declaration of Independence from Great Britain famously stated that "all men are created equal," while...
Hey Great Britain, how's that 'diversity' of your civilization working out for ya?
Drama. Both sides being western funded it's difficult for me to feel sorry for either one. Robbing Peter to pay Paul with U.S. tax dollars.
This is nuts seeing Professors arrested and snipers on roofs of Universities ! History repeats itself !
Just like, the debt of the Federal Reserve is not owned by the States nor the citizens of said. ~ Tavern is open - what is your pleasure?
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Reader Comments
"Still, there remains an uncertainty, although a Mars impact is still possible. However, the most likely scenario in the weeks to come is that more observations of the asteroid will allow that uncertainty to shrink - so that a Mars impact is definitely ruled out."
How is this "most likely"? Why can't it be "most likely" that observations will show that an impact is more probable? This logic is truly baffling. Sounds like a lot of wishful thinking.