The tools of psychology are dangerous in the hands of the wrong men. Modern educational methods can be applied in therapy to streamline man's brain and change his opinions so that his thinking conforms with certain ideological systems.Since the declaration of the Covid-19 Pandemic in March, 2020, the phenomenon of "mass formation psychosis", essentially hypnosis at population level, has become a major subject for discussion, due largely to interviews of psychiatrist Mattias Desmet. Becoming aware of it, one begins to recognize the effects of the cultivation of anxiety and mental confusion, of the steady diet of terrifying data, of constantly changing and conflicting information, of enforced compliance to shifting policies demanding physical and visual isolation.
— Joost A. M. Meerloo, The Rape Of The Mind, 1956.
Joost Meerloo, in Rape Of The Mind, described totalitarian methods throughout the ages used to force obedience. Modern society, with its refined techniques in marketing and mass communication, he wrote, "tends to robotize and automatize man." Where competing interpretations of reality are censored, what is constantly repeated "fixes patterns of thought", which patterns assume realities of their own. "He who dictates and formulates the words and phrases we use, he who is master of the press [and TV], is master of the mind."
Countering totalitarian technique calls for critical thinking, a pattern of thought hesitant to accept information immediately at face value. Critical thinkers look for inconsistencies within narratives. It's said that critical thinking can't be taught, because accumulated life experience is a factor in its ultimate development, if it ever develops at all in a lifetime. On the other hand, critical thinking is open to cultivation, and presumably its cultivation is a feature of liberal education.
Given that, the online search technique now advocated by the Center for an Informed Public came as a surprise for anyone used to seeing critical thinking as a positive trait. The SIFT method, so called, which boasts about the speed with which one can make quick judgments of online material — as briefly as within 30-seconds — would seem to be a recipe for superficiality that brings to mind claims that society is being "dumbed down". The professed target of SIFT is the evil of "misinformation" — that Pandemic-era charge that is oddly vague beyond its failure to hue to an official, but conflict-riddled, story. SIFT is based on a four-step system suggesting that one often makes better decisions with less information rather than with more.
The New York Times showcased SIFT with an opinion piece subtitled "Critical thinking, as we're taught to do it, isn't helping in the fight against misinformation". One is prompted to "stop overthinking", because "the goal of disinformation is to capture attention, and critical thinking is deep attention", this causing people to fall prey to bad actors such as conspiracy theorists who can "warp your perspective". An example of the SIFT method uses Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., long a target of the NY Times, which paper, remarkably, will not review Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci, nor will it even post a paid ad for the book.
In the example, Kennedy's name is Googled — "Look how fast this is" — to a sentence on a Wikipedia page identifying Kennedy as anti-vaccine and a conspiracy theorist. Two other sources, a fact checker and the NIH, indicate Kennedy's views as "outside the consensus". Not being in accord with majority thinking indicates bias, "And that's good enough to know we should probably just move on."
In 2016, there appeared a website, PropOrNot, claiming that Russia was manipulating US opinion online. What stands out is that examples by PropOrNot of information sources that "produce large amounts of propaganda content" are substantially a recitation of excellent sites for crucial information shunned by monopoly media, and for sources of incisive, in-depth analysis and commentary (take a look!), e.g. Corbett Report, Activist Post, Global Research, Paul Craig Roberts, and the like.
What makes PropOrNot momentous, in this case, is that the Washington Post, in an article "Russian propaganda effort helped spread 'fake news' during election, experts say" included PropOrNot, describing it as "a nonpartisan collection of researchers with foreign policy, military and technology backgrounds". Nonpartisan? Hardly! For America's number 2 "Newspaper of Record", famously a CIA mouthpiece, to give credence to PropOrNot was an assault against foremost sources challenging official narrative.
Another Washington Post piece invites readers to take a confusing quiz to determine "Will you fall into the conspiracy theory rabbit hole?." Example: Reader is to choose, from 4 items, the only one declared to be backed by evidence. However, a careful search of the items (GMO food dangers; LSD experiments; AIDS spread; Coronavirus creation) reveals that every one has at least some details open to question. The quiz, in effect, implies that certain questionable issues are "case closed," when they truly are not. Items covered in the quiz (e.g., election fraud, JFK assassination, false flags, Russian collusion, Rothschilds, Deep State, climate change, et al.) are seemingly matched so as to delegitimize certain avenues of exploration.
In The Rape Of The Mind, in a chapter titled "Mental Contagion And Mass Delusion," Meerloo writes: "The lie I tell ten times becomes a half truth to me. And as I continue to tell my half truth to others, it becomes my cherished delusion." Since the Pandemic was declared, the official framework of falsehoods has become truth for much of humanity. Yet some saw through the deception early on. How come?
Igor Chudov, a former student of behavioral economist Richard Thaler, believes those who recognized the fraud are critical thinkers (Chudov has broken with Thaler who is now a central figure in the project to maximize "vaccine uptake" in society1 ). Chudov, cites the famous Asch conformity experiments that reveal how easily people are seduced by majority opinion. He is interested in critical thinkers, and at his Substack site he invites those who saw through the Pandemic deception to explain their experience.
A key revelation of the Asch experiments was the importance of dissenting voices in countering projects directed toward mass conformity. The dissenter is a reminder that prevailing consensus might be absolutely wrong. This is why departure from the official pharmaceutical/governmental Covid Pandemic story line is attacked as "misinformation" with such viciousness and is pilloried in mainstream media (mass conformity having become a principle MSM aim). From the standpoint of the engineers of the Pandemic narrative, with its goal of injecting humanity with RNA technology, critical thinking is a direct threat, and it is being undercut by every means available.
- Thaler joined with Cass Sunstein to produce the book Nudge, which deals with techniques to influence public decision making. In 2008, Sunstein authored Conspiracy Theories, in which he advocates for "cognitive infiltration", the sending of governmental agents into communities of dissenting citizens in order to foster thinking desired by government. Sunstein was thereafter (2009-2012) made Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Obama Administration. Thaler and Sunstein use their influence in the interest of overcoming "vaccine hesitancy." [↩]
Bill Willers is an emeritus professor of biology, University of Wisconsin at Oshkosh. He is founder of the Superior Wilderness Action Network and editor of Learning to Listen to the Land, and Unmanaged Landscapes, both from Island Press. He can be contacted at willers@uwosh.edu. Read other articles by Bill.
Reader Comments
~
From : The Ministry of Truth
To : All who have read anything on this page
Date : 5322 1345 est Ministry of Truth time
Message : Ignore this article...ignore anything you have read on this page....and lastly, forget this message once you ignore.
Are you recommending this Bill Willers fellow or are you suggesting something else because I'm curious and I want to know.
I think if I'm remembering correctly this article spoke to the importance of contrasting views in the wind and that makes sense to me. I would have appreciated some contrasting views in my youth that might have informed my view earlier so that I could have made decisions accordingly, but I suppose the learning process is individual and we each have are own path to trek upon and follow to whatever destination time has in mind. I reckon.
~
See, the beauty is only a few may remember this because so many succumb to the false "ministry of truth"....seems as such to me.
Yours Truly,
Ken
It might be self-fulfilling to suggest a "dissident voice" helps buffer truth, but I don't care because I think it is so.
Thank-you Chicken Farmer and really chicken and pork do not taste the same.
Ken
Haha, true the taste is different! And once you eat fresh homegrown eggs, you never go back to factory eggs.
Keep learning and exploring Ken, the day you stop is the day you die.
I suggested to her that she might want to slow the market down a bit to increase potential demand of chicken chicks. She told me she was done with it for awhile - it is a lot of work nurturing a chick out of the egg from the chickens in the backyard. Still, it cannot be denied, how much protein chickens can deliver - she told me her bigger birds lay 5 eggs a week. That is good production and recently she got herself some sort of rainbow laying hen whose eggs are very colorful and the color of any given egg varies but if I understood correctly, the color is uniform. Imagine that - one egg is blue and the next one is pink. All from the same hen.
Skills with chickens and plants and getting ones hands dirty in the ground are really going to be important going forward is what I think.
So for Mother's day, she finally bought over some of the larger eggs she has been enjoying and shared them with her Mother. I ate one this morning and let me tell you - it was good.
Farming chickens on a small-scale is fixing to be big business is what I think. Lets discuss this later if we can.
Ken
The "Ministry of Truth" wants to know what your take on this question is......
if you answer, the "ministry" will know....
are you willing to take the risk?
(ha, ha.....
Your comrade,
Ken
I am disappointed ...
I think I read that book, but it might of been in 1984 and I don't remember.
Obviously it seems to have accurately predicted the predicament, just was a little early on the timing.
I don't have a problem with collective thought - it is happening regardless comrade.
Ken
Exactly. Why dissent is needed.
I'd like to meet you one day ReRan, but you know how those sort of plans go.
I'll engage in group-think if I think the group is thinking what I think makes good sense to think - know what I mean?
Best,
Ken