OF THE
TIMES
Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.
Trump has multiple objectives in the Iran adventure. Miriam Adelson's and other Jewish billionaires' financial support for Israel is part of the...
Need to keep hammering the competition - Trump currently has the lowest approval ratings of any US president, ever ...
I think this is not worth any further comment ...
What happens to these vehicles during power cuts? They go nowhere. Petrol and diesel engines will take you anywhere on the planet at any time. One...
"LLM" is more accurate nomenclature than "AI". These are "models" of language, nothing more. Many years ago, some of us played with PERL software...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE

This is a very odd article. It seems to me to have some elements that do not make sense at all.
1. Who made the call? We are not told.
2. Why have the 'police' taken the dog? And where is her dog?
3. Why is the neighbour feeling the need to be unknown, except by surname?
How come the reaction of the police to the incident was so over the top in relation to what it was? People not allowed out of their homes?! Really? For a dog bite incident? Hmmm
It is as if the reaction was for something else entirely that the public were not allowed to know and his article just covers the base, closes the gap in perceptions, etc. More than it seems.