© Steve Helber/AP PhotoMessages left by students about the rape on the University of Virginia campus.
Comment: There is lot of public outrage against the American education system since the publication of Rolling Stone's article exposing the rape culture at American universities. As expected, the mainstream media published many articles to control the damage. This is another Yahoo article intended to seed distrust in the victim's account. Here is a short list of the MSM's arguments.
- The victim suffered PTSD because of the rape. PTSD may skew her memory, so her version of the story is unreliable: Do we remember word by word what we said at last night's dinner?
- Rolling Stone didn't contact the sex offenders, so the story is not complete: Do we expect the sex offenders to confess? If the offenders don't confess, does the story becomes a lie?
- The victim should have contacted the police instead of the university: Really? The university has the responsibility of protecting the students and UVA failed to protect its own students.
- "Forced Kissing" is not rape, so the estimate that 20% students get raped is over blown.
- Politicizing the event by comparing the Rolling Stone article with Obama's release of CIA torture report.
- Black and white thinking: People blindly believe in the victim's story.
On November 19, Rolling Stone published its story "A Rape on Campus: A Brutal Assault and Struggle for Justice at UVA" by Sabrina Rubin Erdely, an investigative journalist and two-time winner of the National Magazine Award for investigative reporting.
The article was disturbing, detailing the brutal gang rape of "Jackie" - reportedly her real nickname - at a fraternity house during the beginning months of her freshman year at the college, as part of an initiation ritual for the frat's pledges. Most chilling, perhaps, was one dehumanizing detail she described, where one of the young men attacking her told the others, "Grab its [expletive] leg!" as she struggled in vain.
Last week multiple news sources began calling Jackie's story - and the Rolling Stone piece - into question.
Many highlighted the reporter's decision not to interview the accused men, and also pointed to revelations that the primary assailant was not a member of Phi Kappa Psi, the fraternity named in the story. The Washington Post also found evidence that there was no social event at the fraternity on the night that Jackie said the rape occurred, at a time a party was going on.
On Friday, Rolling Stone apologized to its readers.
The magazine issued a statement saying, "In the face of new information, there now appear to be discrepancies in Jackie's account, and we have come to the conclusion that our trust in her was misplaced. We were trying to be sensitive to the unfair shame and humiliation many women feel after a sexual assault and now regret the decision to not contact the alleged assaulters to get their account."
On Saturday, Rolling Stone modified their statement.
The magazine faced backlash after its initial apology placed the blame on Jackie - who had asked that her attackers not be interviewed for the story - when in in fact it's the magazine's responsibility to thoroughly report and verify every story. "We have come to the conclusion that we were mistaken in honoring Jackie's request to not contact the alleged assaulters to get their account," said Rolling Stone. "These mistakes are on Rolling Stone, not on Jackie."
So what happened to Jackie?
In its investigation of Jackie's story, The Washington Post comments that, "A group of Jackie's close friends, who are sex assault awareness advocates at U-Va., said they believe something traumatic happened to Jackie but also have come to doubt her account. They said details have changed over time, and they have not been able to verify key points of the story in recent days."
© Steve Helber/AP PhotoThe Phi Kappa Psi fraternity house on the UVA campus.
Rolling Stone reports that Jackie herself is now unsure if the man she says lured her into the room where the rape occurred, identified in the story, as "Drew," was a Phi Psi brother. But still, she firmly stands by the account she gave to Erdely. She's even, in the past, spoken of the assault in campus forums.
Among the many details of this story, one important point seems to have been glossed over: the fact that Jackie says she has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and is taking antidepressants.
How PTSD induced by sexual violence can affect memory
PTSD can dramatically affect the way in which a person speaks of his or her own trauma. The repercussions of the trauma can inhibit survivors' ability to narrate their own story in full, which experts say can serve as a psychological defense mechanism.
According to the Mayo Clinic, one of the primary symptoms of PTSD is the presence of "intrusive memories," which cause the survivor to relive their trauma as if it were happening all over again and which lead them to seek out linguistic "safety nets" that protect them from having to relive their abuse.
The National Institute of Health clarifies that PTSD in rape survivors can leave individuals "unable to remember major parts of the trauma."
"A natural response to a traumatic event is to disengage in ways that can make it hard to remember what you saw, heard, and felt," says Art Markman, a psychology professor at the University of Texas.
The events themselves are usually chaotic and unpredictable. "Memory is best for events that follow a familiar pattern, so the chaos itself makes it difficult to establish a timeline and to remember specific details," Markman tells Yahoo Health.
Additionally, the ability to recall a piece of information depends on finding specific cues to help access it. "When the cues that might call information to mind are painful, then people may avoid focusing on them, which may make it hard for them to recall other details from the event as well," Markman adds.
This psychological effect makes it all the more important not to allow discrepancies in victims's stories to automatically falsify or discredit their allegations.
"A victim's memory for an event is likely to be fragmentary," Markman says. "It may be vivid in spots and then be missing key details. It may be hard to remember the order of events as well." A study published in 2011 by Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience confirms that PTSD has lasting effects on a victims' declarative memory, or in other words, their ability to recall facts and knowledge from their experiences.
Markman adds, "One difficulty of this facet of memory is that we typically judge people as remembering accurately when they have clear and confident memories of a situation and are certain of the order in which events occurred. Deviations from this ideal case lead people to think that the victim might have faulty memory. However, we also know from several decades worth of research that people's confidence in their memory is not a good predictor of the accuracy of that memory."
What does it take for a story of rape to "count"?
"What people aren't taking into account here are the effects of trauma," says Alyssa Peterson, a policy organizer at Know Your IX, an organization whose mission is to empower students to combat sexual violence. "Just because Jackie's story is inconsistent in places doesn't mean that it wasn't true. It just reflects the nature of the trauma she experienced. There are no perfect victims, and we shouldn't dismiss Jackie for failing to meet our impossible standards. We should believe her."
Jennifer Marsh, vice president of Victims Services at the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN), which runs the National Sexual Assault Hotline, adds that when discussing rape survivors, it is important to remember that not all survivors experience PTSD, although they may have varying short- and long-term symptoms of trauma.
"A trauma survivor may have a number of short and long-term challenges following an assault, one of which is the ability to recall details of the assault or the appropriate chronology of events leading up to, and following, the assault," Marsh tells Yahoo Health. "Survivors may try to fill in the gaps with what they think may have happened, oftentimes out of fear that if they can't describe the assault in detail they will not be believed."
This failure of journalistic oversight is an unfortunate setback for the work being done by all those who advocate for the survivors of assault, especially on college campuses. Sadly, Rolling Stone's retraction may fuel those who insist that women who claim to have been raped are lying; it reinforces that a woman's word alone is not enough.
and from this we see the predators and there minions.