SOTT
SIGNS
OF THE
TIMES
OF THE
TIMES
Welcome to Sott.net
The World for People who Think
Puppet Masters
Reader Comments
Alain Soral has never said that "these people" don't deserve the same civil rights as he. It's not about "deserving", it's about that very simple question: what are the real objectives of the PTB, when, spurred by a small lobby which doesn't represent "the Gays" but only represent themselves (the same way the CRIF doesn't represent Jews), they impose the gay marriage to the population? Is it really about "equality of rights" and "fight against homophobia"? I don't think so.
Alain Soral is against the gay marriage (like many gays) not because he's "against gays". He clearly explains why the gay marriage is a diversion aimed at diverting people's attention away from real problems in his videos. On the same line, the fact that he's against zionist lobbies doesn't mean he's against Jews.
Alain Soral is against the gay marriage (like many gays) not because he's "against gays". He clearly explains why the gay marriage is a diversion aimed at diverting people's attention away from real problems in his videos. On the same line, the fact that he's against zionist lobbies doesn't mean he's against Jews.
Could you give us links to articles or videos where Alain Soral has actually said that?
After all, they are also saying that Dieudonné is an anti-semite. I expect that the same kind of things are being said about Alain Soral, who said in the interview with the dreadful and pro establishment BBC that France is "entirely under the influence of the Zionist lobby". So, I would expect the Zionists et al. to attack Soral as well. It is called character assassination.
After all, they are also saying that Dieudonné is an anti-semite. I expect that the same kind of things are being said about Alain Soral, who said in the interview with the dreadful and pro establishment BBC that France is "entirely under the influence of the Zionist lobby". So, I would expect the Zionists et al. to attack Soral as well. It is called character assassination.
Mariama, here is a video where the great "equal rights advocate" openly ADVOCATES AGAINST EQUAL RIGHTS: [Link](thus NOT an equal rights advocate!)
He uses the argument that gay marriage is about zionist agenda, as a way to remove from the matter its very essence: gay people and their rights.
Suddenly, when we discuss gay marriage, those PEOPLE (gay people) aren't being talked about, neither are their rights... they have no names, their number isn't mentioned, their loves..nope. Just erase all that and write on top: ZIONIST AGENDA. That is a great way to oppress... almost looks like you are not denying people of their rights, you're just being antizionist, get it?
He uses the argument that gay marriage is about zionist agenda, as a way to remove from the matter its very essence: gay people and their rights.
Suddenly, when we discuss gay marriage, those PEOPLE (gay people) aren't being talked about, neither are their rights... they have no names, their number isn't mentioned, their loves..nope. Just erase all that and write on top: ZIONIST AGENDA. That is a great way to oppress... almost looks like you are not denying people of their rights, you're just being antizionist, get it?
Answer to Lugh
Yes, Lugh, he did. He is against same sex marriage, you can look it up in his videos.
He claims that gay marriage is "part of the zionist agenda" and thus they must not be allowed. It becomes, then, very clear that the existence of gay people is irrelevant to him, as are they rights...
The very fact that gay people DO EXIST and that they didn't have equal rights is enough. Any "equal rights advocate" would be in favour of... equal rights! simple as 2 and 2 make 4. But Alain Soral is against, so he is NOT an "equal rights advocate".
Even if gay marriage WAS part of the zionist agenda, the decision wether to have gay marriage or not should be about gay people and their rights, not about anything else.
Example: in Brazil, slavery for black slaves was granted thanks to political pressure and war threats from the greates bully of the time: Britain... does this mean we should be against freedom for blacks and go back to slavery because Britain is evil? No...
Same logic applies to Alain Sorail, Zionism and gays: IF zionist *were* in favour of gay marriage, WHAT THE HELL TO GAY PEOPLE HAVE TO DO WITH THAT? -> nothing.
Here is a video where the great "philosopher" and "equal rights advocate" advocates AGAINST EQUAL RIGHTS: [Link]
Yes, Lugh, he did. He is against same sex marriage, you can look it up in his videos.
He claims that gay marriage is "part of the zionist agenda" and thus they must not be allowed. It becomes, then, very clear that the existence of gay people is irrelevant to him, as are they rights...
The very fact that gay people DO EXIST and that they didn't have equal rights is enough. Any "equal rights advocate" would be in favour of... equal rights! simple as 2 and 2 make 4. But Alain Soral is against, so he is NOT an "equal rights advocate".
Even if gay marriage WAS part of the zionist agenda, the decision wether to have gay marriage or not should be about gay people and their rights, not about anything else.
Example: in Brazil, slavery for black slaves was granted thanks to political pressure and war threats from the greates bully of the time: Britain... does this mean we should be against freedom for blacks and go back to slavery because Britain is evil? No...
Same logic applies to Alain Sorail, Zionism and gays: IF zionist *were* in favour of gay marriage, WHAT THE HELL TO GAY PEOPLE HAVE TO DO WITH THAT? -> nothing.
Here is a video where the great "philosopher" and "equal rights advocate" advocates AGAINST EQUAL RIGHTS: [Link]
"He claims that gay marriage is "part of the zionist agenda" and thus they must not be allowed. It becomes, then, very clear that the existence of gay people is irrelevant to him, as are they rights..."
I think you missed Soral's points here.
There's something fishy in the "marriage for all" law. It's simply the first stage towards "procreation for all", which is the real agenda.
I'll refer you to some of the very psychopathic claims made by "prominent" promoters of gay marriage:
(speaking of surrogate mothers) "Renting your belly to make a child or renting your arms to work at the factory, what's the difference?" (Pierre Bergé)
Sometimes a pic is worth a thousand words. Take a look at the following article and the utterly sick intro picture, you might understand why Soral and others are suspicious of the real agenda behind the marriage for all ***as promoted by the PTB***:
[Link]
This gay guy is also explaining it rather well: [Link]
Again, the majority of gays didn't want this law (they already have the Pacs which guarantees their rights: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_solidarity_pact), a law which is promoted by a very questionable (and SMALL) lobby for very questionable ends.
This societal issue is merely a diversion, and a way (again) to divide the masses and prevent them from focusing on the real issues and uniting against the real enemy: the psychopathic elite. Enough said on the matter.
I think you missed Soral's points here.
There's something fishy in the "marriage for all" law. It's simply the first stage towards "procreation for all", which is the real agenda.
I'll refer you to some of the very psychopathic claims made by "prominent" promoters of gay marriage:
(speaking of surrogate mothers) "Renting your belly to make a child or renting your arms to work at the factory, what's the difference?" (Pierre Bergé)
Sometimes a pic is worth a thousand words. Take a look at the following article and the utterly sick intro picture, you might understand why Soral and others are suspicious of the real agenda behind the marriage for all ***as promoted by the PTB***:
[Link]
This gay guy is also explaining it rather well: [Link]
Again, the majority of gays didn't want this law (they already have the Pacs which guarantees their rights: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_solidarity_pact), a law which is promoted by a very questionable (and SMALL) lobby for very questionable ends.
This societal issue is merely a diversion, and a way (again) to divide the masses and prevent them from focusing on the real issues and uniting against the real enemy: the psychopathic elite. Enough said on the matter.
"French philosopher and equal rights advocate" -> this statement is false. Alain Soral is NOT an equal rights advocate.
He is a fierce opposer of gay and lesbian marriage, says these people don't deserve the same civil rights as he, Alain Soral, has.
Perhaps he is an "equal rights advocate" when we're talking about his own, but not other people's. Yep, that's gotta be it.
I would support the whole quenelle movement if it weren't for this detail, this "detail" being the dignity of millions of people.