OF THE
TIMES
"We have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. This disparity is particularly great as between ourselves and the peoples of Asia. In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. To do so, we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and day-dreaming; and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives. We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford today the luxury of altruism and world-benefaction."
~ US State Department, 1948
Wondering how long the next whistle blower lasts. I'm betting 3 weeks before they're suicided. Of course all of this happens after they publically...
Jupiter-Uranus conjunction averts major war in Middle East [Link] #astrology
I guess it's only the Israeli police that get to shoot at rock throwers.
He will die at the hands of a Ukrainian who has lost everything because of him. Nobody hates him more than the Ukrainian people do today.
When I was born, the global population was a hair under 3 Billion, increasing at a rate of 1.7%. [Link] It was the end of an era for North...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
I have to disagree that this is punitive. This seems perfectly fair. It costs money to fly something through the air with technology, and the cost should be proportional to the weight of the object carried, whether this is a human being or a bag of rocks.
It may seem punitive because we're used to "one ticket one price" or the idea that people are equal as beings and have dignity. But when it comes to pricing the cost of lifting something way up into the air and sending it somewhere on a craft that always has the same external shape, the weight is really the only major factor in determining the extra cost for that object.
I can't see how you could call it punitive unless the weight added to a plane from passengers only made a negligible difference in fuel costs, in which case a surcharge would indeed be unjustified discrimination. But otherwise, my question is, why should the airlines be forced to charge the same price for a service that costs more for different people? You can't argue with physics or basic economics.