Targets: Some American GIs saw French women as spoils of war according to an explosive new book
For the past four years, the men had been Germans, and now, since the city had been liberated in August, 1944, they were Americans. It made little difference.
Elisabeth held out three fingers of her hand to indicate the price of her body - three hundred francs.
'Too much,' said the soldier.
Elisabeth sighed. She had seen that before as well. Wearily, she kept the three fingers held up, almost as an insult.
There was no negotiation - three hundred was little enough as it was.
'Two hundred,' the soldier insisted.
'Non,' said Elisabeth. 'Three hundred or nothing'.
The soldier approached her, hate in his eyes. Elisabeth glowered back, starting to feel scared.
'In that case,' said the soldier, 'it will be nothing.'
The soldier then placed his huge hands around Elisabeth's neck and started to squeeze. She struggled as hard as she could, lashing out, but it was in vain.
After a minute or so she slumped down, her lifeless body falling on to the stained sheets. The soldier then calmly removed his trousers and had sex with her. For nothing.
Afterwards, he went through Elisabeth's belongings and stole her cash and jewellery. He then went round the block, found another prostitute and took her to dinner and the movies.
For the GI, it had been a swell evening. Paris was just as they said it was.
Even by the standards of war, this was a particularly grim episode. But while such barbaric murders were extremely rare, a new book reveals that the violation by American soldiers of the women whom they had been sent to Europe to free and assist was far more common than has first been thought.
It is, of course, a horrific fact of war that soldiers rape the women of the lands they conquer.
Many troops - but certainly not all - see female flesh as a justified spoil, something they deserve after fighting with the husbands, fathers and sons of the women they abuse.
Rape is also a way by which one nation signifies that it now has dominance over another.
We can have your women, rape says, and there is nothing you can do because we are in charge.
Many thousands of German women and girls, for example, were raped by Russian troops in the battle for Berlin at the end of World War II.
Until now, we in the former Allied Western nations tend to regard rape as something carried out by countries other than ourselves.
Through films such as Saving Private Ryan and The Longest Day, we are conditioned to think of the Allied troops as being above such behaviour.
However, an explosive new book published by an American academic sensationally debunks that myth.
In What Soldiers Do, Professor Mary Louise Roberts of the University of Wisconsin argues that American GIs committed rape thousands of times during the War. And, more surprisingly still, many of their victims were French.
As Professor Roberts says: 'My book seeks to debunk an old myth about the GI, thought of as a manly creature that always behaved well - the GIs were having sex anywhere and everywhere.'
In total, it is estimated that some 14,000 women were raped by American GIs in Western Europe from 1942 to 1945. In France, 152 American soldiers were tried for rape, of whom 29 were hanged.
But the statistics do not reveal the full story. There were undoubtedly thousands of rapes in France, many of which went unreported by the victims who were keen to avoid the dreadfully unfair stigma that rape carried with it during those days.
But why did the Americans rape their allies? For the average GI, France was as much an 'erotic adventure' as a military expedition, and the war was, in part, 'sold' to conscripted soldiers as an opportunity to meet attractive French women.
Many of the soldiers' fathers had been in France during World War I, and had come back with lurid tales of the supposed looseness of French women.
Hotspot: The Channel port of Le Harve, pictured after a bombing raid during the war, was particularly badly affected by crime
As Professor Roberts rightly observes, the average GI 'had no emotional attachment to the French people or the cause of their freedom'.
Magazines aimed at the troops such as Stars And Stripes showed pictures of cheering women during liberation parades, accompanied by headlines such as 'Here's What We're Fighting For'.
The magazine even published 'useful' French phrases, such as the translations for 'I am not married' and 'You have charming eyes'.
It was almost as if the magazine was telling the GIs: come and get it, boys.
And that's exactly what they did. Throughout the summer of 1944, from the moment they had pushed back the Germans during the D-Day landings in June, the Americans unleashed throughout northern France, in the words of Professor Roberts, a 'tsunami of male lust'.
'Normandy women launched a wave of rape accusations against American soldiers,' Roberts writes, 'threatening to destroy the erotic fantasy at the heart of the operation. The spectre of rape transformed the GI from rescuer-warrior to violent intruder'.
Particularly badly affected was the port of Le Havre. One citizen wrote to the town's mayor, Pierre Voisin, complaining of 'crimes of all kinds, committed day and night'.
The writer said that the GIs 'attacked, robbed . . . both on the street and in our houses' and were essentially 'a regime of terror, imposed by bandits in uniform'.
But the biggest problem was sex. GIs were copulating with every French woman they could get their hands on, willingly or not, and worse still, they were doing it in public.
'These things are happening in full daylight right in front of the children or other people who happen to be near,' said one civilian.
Many impromptu brothels were set up by French women desperate for money. At one house, soldiers would be lined up all the way up the staircase.
'They urinate along the walls and in the hallways,' one witness noted with disgust, 'and they attack any women who happen to live there.'
What made it worse for the French was that the Americans were the same troops who had devastated their towns through aerial bombing and artillery barrages.
Many French felt - with much justification - that their towns had been needlessly destroyed in a macho display of American firepower.
An estimated 20,000 civilians were killed in the battle for Normandy, and in Le Havre alone, 3,000 had died.
Angry officials pointed out that while thousands of French dead had been hauled from the rubble, no more than ten German bodies had been found.
With the raping and the bombing, it was therefore understandable why some French wondered whether they really had been 'liberated' after all.
The Americans, recalled one Resistance fighter, 'soured their reputation by behaving as if they were in a conquered country'. Some even regarded this 'second occupation' as being worse than the first.
'France for the Americans - as well as the Germans - is Paris and women,' observed another Frenchman, noting that there was little difference between the average GI and average Boche.
French women who worked as prostitutes even looked back on their German clients with something approaching affection. GIs, it seemed, wanted more than just sex.
'You had to keep an eye on your purse with those bastards,' one woman recalled. 'It's sad to say, but I missed my Fritzes, who were gentler with women. I was not the only one to say it; all the women thought the same as me, only they did not always say it.'
Some prostitutes were even killed by GIs. In addition to Elisabeth in Paris, another was stabbed 29 times in the abdomen, while a woman called Marie was killed for refusing to be sodomised.
Rumours abounded of particularly horrific stories, including that of a girl who had been hacked to death and then had her corpse violated.
In the eyes of many GIs, French women were little more than cigarettes - something that you got with your rations and could be shared around. Unsurprisingly, venereal diseases were rampant, but the American top brass was more concerned about the health of 'our boys' and the possibility of them infecting their apple pie sweethearts back home, rather than in the health of the French women.
Clinics were overwhelmed with women suffering from VD, and many were sent to and from hospitals that had no room for them.
'An unwanted, homeless population of diseased women being shuttled from town to town,' Professor Roberts writes, 'these prostitutes compromise the legacy of the American occupation in Normandy'.
But the worst legacy was, of course, rape. Most shockingly, it also emerges that the American authorities did little about it.
Although educational leaflets entitled 'Let's Look At Rape' were distributed, they did nothing to dampen the desire of GIs to sexually assault those whom they were supposedly freeing from oppression.
However, some justice was needed to be seen to be done, but even that process was deeply flawed. Of the mere 152 men who were tried for rape, 139 of the defendants were 'coloured'.
It appears that the American Army was keen to treat black soldiers as scapegoats, and labelled them as being 'hypersexual' and therefore more likely to be rapists.
Courts martial were often little more than kangaroo courts, with men sent to the gibbet convicted on the flimsiest of evidence, and tried by officers with little or no legal training.
French victims were asked to identify their assailants from entire battalions of black soldiers, although often the rapes had been carried out in rooms that were barely lit, if at all.
In addition, another unpalatable truth is that many French women were as racist as the American officers.
Fears that some sort of 'black terror' was being unleashed on women in Normandy were carried far and wide, and it was all too easy to pin a crime on to a black soldier rather than a white one.
In addition, some French woman claimed to have been raped rather than admit that they had willingly had sex, and some prostitutes would threaten a rape accusation in order to extract more money out of a GI.
The liberation of their country was therefore a bittersweet affair for the French.
The crimes perpetrated by the Americans against the women also deeply affected French men, who felt emasculated by the Americans.
They were bigger, stronger, richer and healthier, and had not spent years being subjugated and forced to serve under the heel of the German jackboot.
Although we like to think of the men who freed Europe as members of the 'greatest generation', and that the Allies had fought a 'good war', as Professor Roberts shows, the true story is a lot more complicated and disturbing.
Even today, there will be elderly women sitting on the other side of the Channel who close their eyes when they hear the word 'liberation'.
Osaka's mayor recently put his rapacious foot in his and his country's mouth with excuses about soldier's 'needs' during the war as an excuse for the slavery and forced prostitution of women during their imperial war, as conquest, once began invades every fiber of society and all manner of 'taboos' are thrown out the window in its defense.
The only difference seems to be who wears the uniform and how much interaction the different nations/societies had before all this 'liberation' began. Everytime, it's the same message, "This time it's different", yet it never is, it's always the same.