OF THE
TIMES
They call it "The American Dream," because you have to be asleep to believe it.
Does this bill cover presidents, senators, generals, etc...
i am certain they are only doing uplifting things for the betterment of all of society and for their brothers in NYC. Nothing fishy....nothing...
MOLE People? What Are These Individuals Doing In New York Sewers? Journalists ?
"limits of human agency" We continue to bump up against the ceiling of our abilities, which makes it all seem circular in our being's place in...
Poor Marco. He's just the viceroy of Cuba, a position that maxes him out already. How could he care about the Israeli nukes ? Of which everybody...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE

We all agree that the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of religion implies the individual's right to freedom from religion. It does not imply that one should be required to chose among religions.
It seems to me that the Second Amendment's guarantee of the right to bear arms likewise implies the right not to bear arms. It does not imply that one should be required to own a gun.
That is, if someone is opposed to owning a firearm, then he should not be forced to acquire one.