LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK AND JOE QUINN
Since the 9/11 attacks, no book has provided a satisfactory answer as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately responsible for carrying them out - until now.
What a hero. More likely JFK'd...
Amerikagulag says: "The Ron Paul of Belgium!" (RC sez: AMEN!)
Amerikagulag says: He better watch his back or he'll be suicided soon.
(RC sez: There I think that this guy is dangerous enough to the PTB that they'd be more likely to take him out to intimidate the masses from following in his footsteps ans awakening; especially, the upper levels of the NON-PTB.)
Too rare; too rare. Infinitely sadly, these days, it requires absolute bravery to speak the truth.
R.C.
I found some online transcriptions, for those SOTTites/SOTTypes who prefer to read, rather than deal with a video.* Here are two: [Link]. and, [Link] I'm fairly certain there also exist other translation locations as when I last found one, it was on a different site than those.
I also believe that the more accurate Western English translation would reveal that he says to all the simpletons, shills and sellouts, for their lies, actions and inactions, simply:
- "FUCK YOU!"; or,
- "I say, 'FUCK YOU!' "
Rather than the transcription's "I fuck you." **
However, it appears that all are copies or minor modifications of the original translation per the subtitles on the video. Since truth and the masses' awareness of it are what the Psychopathic PTB are most afraid of, I doubt that they sponsored, or at least, intended to sponsor, those subtitles. As such, I think WE ALL OWE A BIG THANK YOU TO GERALDINE FEUILLIEN, who is creditied, at the end of the video as being the subtitle translator, and that, if allowed and proper, if anyone needs a translator, they should hire her!
Therefore, I, R.C., personally and from the depth of my being,*** THANK GERALDINE FEUILLEN! For if truth is to win out, it will be as a result of the combination of such efforts like hers and SOTT's.
R.C.
* Especially since I would put the literacy of SOTTites/SOTTypes up against the readers of ANY OTHER SITE in the world. Pardon, but as Walter Brennan would say in that Old TV Western, "No brag; just fact." - Indeed, that's what Orwell pointed out with the concept of Newspeak in 1984, as when one restricts language, they likewise restrict our ability to communicate and think.)
** This is the first time, in any comment, I've ever made, that I've listed that word as spelled above; instead usually opting for "f*** or f**k; and rarely, if at all, f*ck. However, the WHERE and WHEN and WHAT he exactly says - I believe - is part of the point, and therefore have done away with the "expletive deleted" approach here. (I wonder what would happen if Ron Paul, in his closing speech to the U.S. House said the same word, and repeatedly - connecting it in such a fashion as to prevent the MSM from reporting it without concurrently reporting on their own malfeasance and assistance in the grand BigBrother/Fascist/NWO conspiracy that's been so long afoot and which hopes to shortly, even more openly "come out" of its den of iniquity. Sadly, it's likely something most of us will see absent the success of "truthers"**** such as us.
*** No matter how relatiively shallow some might maintain that is; and which I pray is not the case.
**** Despite the PTB/MSM's cooption and cornering the market restricting the definition of the term, "truther," only in an abysmally dysfunctional society could that label somehow be considered a bad epithet. Newspeak indeed!
RC
Laurent Louis.
While listening, including reading the comments above, could not help to notice the quote on the right hand side panel shown here, thinking it rather appropriate concerning this rare parliamentary speaking.
Quote from SotT side panel:
"Few men are willing to brave the disapproval of their fellows, the censure of their colleagues, the wrath of their society. Moral courage is a rarer commodity than bravery in battle or great intelligence. Yet it is the one essential vital quality for those who seek to change a world which yields most painfully to change."
- Robert F. Kennedy
let us take a moment to remember Benazir Bhutto who also said '911 was an inside job'.
What 'civilized people' need are not 'leaders', but ORGANIZATION. Leaders will always fall into the trap of being controlled by money. Only sheep and lemmings need 'leaders'. Civilized people need an organized collective to oppose this evil.
What an inspiration Belgium MP Laurent Louis is to us. Thank you for bringing this to your website for us to see. If we only had one person in the US Congress of this calibre, just one.
What's the big deal about fearing death for speaking the truth?
After all, we all die, and it usually isn't a pleasant experience.
This density-3D-is a school, more appropriately a choice between truth and lies, or Service to Self or Service to Others.
We're here to learn the difference between the two, then put into action which one we choose.
Aside from those of us who are psychopaths, the choice is ours.
It seems like this person is watching too much action and spy movies! what a bunch of nonsense, I am from Afghanistan and would definitely thank Americans for having freed our country from the fundamentalists, i can imagine similar reaction by at least 80% of Iraqies who did not exist under the tyranny of Saddam. so please lets drop this nonesense of conspiracy theories and let us get on with our lives and the newborn democracies acrosds the region, which does not mean that there are no other dangers such as the religious fundamentalism or lack of economic and social development!
Where's a REAL Shill Stalker when you need one?
What are your facts to support your conclusory statements, which as much as state that their are no conspiracies? When a group of people make a plan, to go meet at a park for a picnic, by definition, that's a conspiracy. So, are you just saying there's no Evil Conspiracies out there? Or, rather, how much are you getting paid/cui bono from you shill stew statement.
R.C.
Ask Gruffalo. I too wonder how much you're getting paid to pretend the US is actually 'creating democracies', and that 911 was done by 19 Arabs with tweezers and toothpicks. Nice work if you can get it. But you're probably on the payroll of some three-letter department already. gruffalo, You will notice this site is jam packed with controversial, non-conventional, conspiratorial, sensational and rarely published information. Perhaps you happened upon it by accident. Perhaps you were sent here. If the latter, you can go back to your masters and tell them SOTT isn't biting on the party line.
Well I must say, for somebody from Afghanistan, your spelling and grammar is pretty good, not that there aren't educated people in Afghanistan, but it is Afghanistan after all. Do you feel liberated when American drones kill your innocent civilians? And when the occupiers go on a rampage and murder your people, does that give you a sense of advancement? How will the future generations, that have to grow up, homeless, parent-less in your war torn country, feel about their future when they realize that they will never achieve their potential because of this resource grab disguised as the "war on terror"? And really, how many well educated, and the less fortunate, believe the official tale of 911, and how it was orchestrated by a dying CIA asset and implemented by 19 goatherders , while 9 somehow managed to escape the attack with their lives?
Be certain of one thing shill, the facade is crumbling fast, and it is certain, beyond a doubt that truth will be told. I can't vouch for anyone else here, but I know that I will not rest until all the conspirators, including the shills, are brought to justice.
what is your problem?
albury smith comes here propagating the lies of 9/11, and i simply point out there is no evidence to support the lies of the official version, but reams of evidence that shows it to be impossible, and then i simply point out in another thread that RT is a propaganda channel, and you suggest that im doing something wrong?
what the hell is your problem?
Too Much Movies & Falsely Claimed "Shill Stalker"
To: Supposed Shill Stalker:
Given that it is reasonable to believe that YOU, (supposed) “Shill Stalker” have above asked ME, Rowan Cocoan, a/k/a RC, “What’s wrong with you?” (Implying "why am I picking on poor old you?" If you read Tolkein’s The Two Towers, you’ll see that’s the exact tactic that good ol’ (totally evil) “Sauruman” expressly uses when visited by “Gandalf,” et al, in the Chapter, “The Voice of Sauruman.”) I reply here, (though it’s frankly a waste of time), as I last replied to you in your absurd comments on the CIA's Cooption of the Media, Operation Mockingbird, et al, and my questions to you which remain there unanswered, (despite my kindness in answering yours), at [Link]
All I see here in your latest "begging the issue"/ "beside the point" NON-point, “appeal to emotion,” is more standard propaganda BS, just like there - where, at least as of the time I post this - our comments culminated with my reply to your attack on the speaker, (moi), rather than the issue, where I stated, simply, “Ah, the Good Ol’ Ad Hominem.” (See, generally, this standard list of shill/ disinformation tactics and commonly used logical fallacies at : [Link] Who knows. Maybe you can acquire a few more esoteric ones, although they won’t fool the folks here.)
Rename yourself to “shill” and I’ll leave your title alone, “Oh Greatest of All Falsely Claimed Stalkers of Shills.” (Sarcasm, save the words “Falsely Claimed”.)
R.C.
Death is the only wise adviser that we have. Whenever you feel, as you always do, that everything is going wrong and you're about to be annihilated, turn to your death and ask if that is so. Your death will tell you that you're wrong; that nothing really matters outside its touch. Your death will tell you, 'I haven't touched you yet.”
~Carlos Castanada via Don Juan
or perhaps you could try backing up your baseless claims with a substantial fact or a cohesive comprehensible argument?
for your information. Ive never expressed anything but doubt here for the official version of 9/11, and if youd care to google the history of "albury smith" who brought me here, youd see why anyone with truth on their side would take him on, and my only other "sin" according to you was to state that RT news was a propaganda outlet for the govt of russia.. something youre yet to say you believe or otherwise.
id simply call you a nutter, because frankly, thats what youve shown yourself to be, but then youll howl about ad hominems, all the while, simply attacking me and making false claims, on the back of a simple statement i made about RT. smh
Yes, thank you Louis. As to the suicide, it's an interesting argument. Yes, his death would put an end to his meddling and be a warning to others. But, his death can also turn him into a marauder and plant even more concrete seeds of doubt in others. And, he is worth much more to the PTB if they can discredit him. From my observations it looks like PTB turn all potential problems into opportunities. As do most all very successful self-serving types.
I don't doubt that Iraqis and Afghans found their leaders oppressive, but Joe said it all! You are not "liberated" when those who liberate you are responsible for your oppression.
Sorry used the wrong word. Meant martyr not marauder.
here we have a man that stands up for the truth and has the guts to speak that truth.
What will happen to him, he will be shunned and marginalized, he will be considered a crackpot crazy conspiracy theorist there will be so much disinformation that nobody will take what he says seriously.
Looking at some of the comments prompted by this article the process has already begun.
Has this man been given a fair hearing is the truth in this day and age something of the distant past, or something that has been manufactured for the benefit of the few to hoodwink the many who are enthralled.
"What will happen?...." It was 'happening' as he spoke. The rotund fellow directly behind and above him was, at times staring off into space or rubbing his eyes but, at no time did I see him actually even pretend to be listening. Then there was the woman who 'visited' and the man who came by to shake his hand and likely pass a few words of whatever.
Monsieur Louis shook them far more than they'd like anyone to know. It's somewhat an exercise in the teachings of Sun Tzu. Fortunately, very fortunately for us and others who had the advantage, or shall I say the opportunity to read the remarkable translation by Mdme Feuillien I have hopes that alot of people will know what Monsieur Louis said. I read along and listened and she is the first translator that I've read who actually translated every word as he spoke them i.e. verbatim.
He is so like Nigel Farrage in the EU who fulminates full-on and, like M. Louis, is surrounded by fat old goats pretending to be bored and above it all. Perhaps not for long, n'est pas?
As to 9/11, and/or, whoever the f*** is "albury smith," I've not written a single solitary word about either of them in any posts you mention nor where your misnamed existence has supposedly revealed itself (and NEITHER HAVE YOU IN YOUR POSTS WHICH BROUGHT ABOUT MY COMMENTS ABOUT YOUR POSTS!)
So I NOW WILL: Re: 9/11, Anyone who agrees with the official version is either uninformed, misinformed, disinformed, or bought and sold. Nuf sed. No news there.
Now, on with the show! (To wit: the issue, proper.; a/k/a, back to the point,) If one reads your post below the Abby Martin video on the CIA and COINTELPRO and Operation Mockingbird, etc. at [Link] [PLEASE DO NOTICE MY links to facts and events and provable REAL words written, rather than YOUR ethereal or conclusory MIS-statements about how I must be “a nutter,” et al.*] -
For at that link, any and all will see the following:
(1) There, you stated
“haha “ By: shill stalker
.. straight from the state funded Russia Today propaganda channel. (Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:23 CST)
(2) To which comment, Niall replied, (apparently whilst I was typing my comment for you, as his wasn’t there as I began typing mine):
“It's a pretty damning indictment of the US media that it takes a Russian 'propaganda' channel to tell Americans how it is.” Wed, 23 Jan 2013 04:33 CST
(Unsurprisingly, his point was On Point, etc. - contra, what I’ve seen you type since your Holy Shillness showed itshelfishness here, on a site dedicated to truth, no less!)
(3) My comments and -still unanswered questions to you;
(4) Your NON-reply to my questions, with a question to me;
(5) My reply to your Non Responsive answer with, nevertheless, my most courteous answer to YOUR question;
(6) Your dismissal of me as a “foaming at the mouth” lunatic, to which I responded, “Ah, the Good Ol’ Ad Hominem.” (And there, for God’s sake, let it rest.)
There exists in most of us what is known as “common sense.” This is not something unique to present humanity. Thus, unsurprisingly, these bits of wisdom were known to the Greek and Roman cultures, the latter expressing these things in terms Latin, and which handed down to us “fancy” words, such as “ad hominem,” which means to attack the speaker, rather than to address the issue. In a previous comment above, I’ve provided a link to a list of such ancient, standard, and time-dishonored tactics.
You’ve simply replied with an insult directed at this (falsely claimed) “nutter” writer, rather than addressing the issue, which is classically known as avoiding the issue by attacking the person who happened to say or write it, (a/k/a, “ad hominem.”)
If any wish to see the sordid truth behind all above, ye only need
(1) Watch the Abby Martin video at [Link](2) See the discussions in the comments below it; and,
(3) Watch the above Video or read the transcriptions I’ve provided above; and,
(4) Make your own decision.
Upon same, I look forward to hearing the verdict of SOTTites/SOTTypes, though I pray you not even waste your time. (Indeed, first see what Ruth said when “shill stalker” first ill-shadowed this land:
“Yah know, Rowan, I think you just provided the response that shrilly was looking for. Probably shrilly would have been better known as ... "shit stirrer". But these people are not going to tell you (what their) real intent is, are they? That's what makes it so interesting. Best to figure out what they're about.”
Ah, wisdom - painful wisdom
R.C.
*To which, given my roots and upbringing, it’s all I can do not to offer to meet you in person, you sorrier by the day sack of . .
RC’s Better Angels: “No, RC, listen to Ruth’s painful wisdom”
RC’s Consciousness: “But, come on! :Am I to politely put up with kind of nonsense from a . . .:
RC’s Better Angels: “You are not so foolish as to not see truth before you, RC...... let it go, RC....let it go.
Forgive them, they know not .......it is finished.
Done.
RC
".. straight from the state funded Russia Today propaganda channel"
thats right idiot..
thats all i said, and from that simple observation youve concluded that i agree with the government version of everything from 9/11 to sandy hook, and scream that i provide you with answers to all your questions..
my alias seemed to be deemed useful as something to attack, so i simply provided an explanation for it. if youd care to google "albury smith" youd see who the real shills are.
fact is - i didnt even watch the video .. i simply made a simple observation, as the fact that RT was government propaganda was currently in the news at the time.
you respond with reams of nonsense.. heres 50 cents chuckles, go rent a clue.
Shrilly,*
"heres 50 cents - go rent a clue." **
I must say I'm not at all surprised that you would value so lightly those bits of information that help one gain wisdom .
And to end, (and again, for the N'th time), Ah, the good ol' ad hominem. See, supra, with links, by:
R.C.
* Credit: Ruth.
** It's spelled "here's", or "here is". ;-p
RC
keep going, you discredit yourself much better than i can
the comment post degenerate into a name calling session. One interesting thing in the video is the reaction of the man behind Louis...im guessing due to his spot abouve the floor level he is a moderator or leader of the Parlaiment. I could see that his wish was that Laurent Louis would quit talking.
@canyonjammer, see my comment above. I concur.
in Belgium. And ridiculed. And deemed a nutcase. His house has been raided by the police several times. He has been accused of sexual harassment, of being a racist. He opened his mouth (and rightly so) about Belgium's pedophile networks, showed how poorly the Dutroux affair has been handled, had proofs about the existence of these networks (the autopsy of the little girls), how corrupt Belgium's government is, and about Belgium's Prime minister Elio di Rupo's taste for young men.
Recently, he sided with the workers in the Arcelor-Mittal case (the shutting down of a factory, causing 1300 job losses, a tragedy in this already poor area of Belgium).
His website and blog have been censored many times. So I wonder how long he will be able to be so open about what he thinks...
How long?.....till he's gone. His is a voice that won't be silenced by marginalizing or shunning or shaming. He is a truly courageous man and it would be good to be able to hear/read all he has to say until they silence him....and they will.
Shills or Shill Stalker and the like: it is apparent that success for these individuals rests in distracting the commentors from the topic at hand. Although it's an over-used phrase, "Don't feed the trolls" seems to apply here.
And for any of you who feel ill-used or unjustly slandered, just pull on your big boy pants and write comments that are cogent and address the topic ....honestly. None of us should have any truck with any individuals who feel they can hijack a thread with ad hominum or other forms of personal attack. This site is for grownups. Behave appropriately....squabbling is irritating for those of us who are attempting to discuss relevant issues. It's also a fucking bore.
As for any reference to the grand democracy that Western elements 'bring' ....utter bullshit.
Re:Rowan & ShillMan: RC's Apologies
Callisto (and all):
S
To quote from a previous,similarly chastening, wise post Ruth to moi - as I quoted and noted above:
" 'Yah know, Rowan, I think you just provided the response that shrilly was looking for. Probably shrilly would have been better known as ... "shit stirrer". But these people are not going to tell you -what their- real intent is, are they? That's what makes it so interesting. Best to figure out what they're about.'
Ah, wisdom - painful wisdom. "
Same ended with..."Done."
RC
Ps., I also must apologize re my next above "first level " comment, Re: "have 50 cents go rent a clue" which was, through MY mistake, posted as such when it was intended to be at the level of a comment on a comment, - a rather common error, such as my dear Callisto's at "Already Marginalized," above - and which merely served to give "shrilly" (Credit: Ruth) one more start. For that too, apologies.
Finally - and also per my above - "(And there, for God’s sake, let it rest.)." "Done."
RC
Rowan, thank you for this last comment, you're a creditable and frequent poster and I usually read your remarks whilst nodding in agreement.
As for my mis-posting....I confess, I'm a 'techno-dolt' and it's only luck that affords me the correct placement for most of my remarks. I'll do my best to place future remarks appropriately.
Cheers,
Callisto
The Ron Paul of Belgium! He better watch his back or he'll be suicided soon.