LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK AND JOE QUINN
Since the 9/11 attacks, no book has provided a satisfactory answer as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately responsible for carrying them out - until now.
It's probably an artifact - or a souvenir, from another country - err, ok, other planet. What's "wrong" with that? People take keepsafes all the time, when they travel.
Any serious reader of this sight should know that time is circular. Advanced civilizations have come and gone many times. These artifacts are most likely reminents of these pas civilizations and should be studied in that context. Evil-lution? Maybe it's not exactly what we think it is.
Messy travelers who don't pick up after themselves or perhaps intentional jokesters.
lol. Clever quip and probably just as likely as other theories.
It seems silly to me that a conclusion, that is often jumped to when a manufactured object predates the existance of humans on the very flawed timescale "science" has created, of how it must have been aliens. There are mountains of evidence to suggest that humans were here with the dinosaurs and other ancient organisms, and we didn't evolve from unintelligent monkey-men to these shining examples of wisdom and intellect many often paint modern man as. It seems quite possible that we have become less intelligent over time, and there is a fair amount of evidence to suggest that also.
Lots of odd finds mentioned in this link, but how to check their veracity is the difficulty?
[Link]
It looks like regular piece of specimen rock you see in rock shows all the time. Is it really metal? Metallic ore, maybe, but it doesn't look like refined metal - at least as far as I can make out in the low-res picture.
As far as modern objects being buried in coal goes - I don't know how that makes them any older than maybe a few thousand years or so.
If you assume cometary near-misses every now and then, James McCanney's theories of organic compounds coming to earth from comet tails seems like a reasonable way to obtain coal and petroleum deposits in large quantities in any time period that includes major interaction of earth and cometary material. That could certainly be as recently as a few thousand years ago, maybe less.
Those are my thoughts, anyway. It makes more sense to me than automatically assuming all coal has to be millions of years old.
Unknown Earth: A Handbook of Geological Enigmas, compiled by William Corliss, 1980.
It covers everything from biotic to abiotic origins of oil, to frogs locked in pockets of cambrian rock that came to life then died after being exposed, to Russians revivifying supposedly fossilized bacteria and algae millions of years old. Little bits of interesting tales for just about everyone that just show that no one really knows Jack Crap, but the Crap family is dispersed very evenly throughout this planet.
When you are told that fantastic cave formations take tens of thousands of years to form from carbonic acid, but equally fantastic cave formations can take days to months to form from sulfuric acid, you tend to accept that the 'experts' are blowing coal dust up your skirts.
Just below Memphis, Tn, a number of years ago, when the Mississippi River fell to around the super-low levels we saw in 2012, a grove of ancient tree stumps was discovered in the riverbed, still rooted on the spot where they grew. The stumps and accompanying logs had been changed into coal. Marks on the stumps and logs indicated that before they became carbonized, the trees had been cut down with a metal axe. This area was the ground level during the Pleistocene.
Who can guess how many of these artifacts have vanished into furnaces?
. . . and newbies.
And we think we know it all . . .