LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK AND JOE QUINN
Since the 9/11 attacks, no book has provided a satisfactory answer as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately responsible for carrying them out - until now.
"Oddly, the more disadvantaged people are, the more they are likely to support a system that is doing them no favours. This is because of cognitive dissonance. In one US example of this low-income Latinos are more likely to trust government officials than high-income Latinos."
This ties in nicely with Bob Altemeyer's work in "The Authoritarians".
The really scary thing about a world run by psychopaths is that Right Wing Authoritarians - whose numbers are far higher - will fight unto death for the system they know, no matter how plainly visible you try to make the true state of affairs for them.
This article is absolutely true. Though I disagree with Niall in the statement that the more disadvantaged people are the more likely they are to support the system that is doing them no favors.
I have found the exact opposite. Being within a certain class, when I talk to peers in that class (the wealthy - or, at this point, at least not the totally impoverished), this is often what I get in response to questioning the foundations of the system, "oh, well, most people don't think that way," or "but this is how it is," the worst group are the wealthy new agers who sit on their zafus meditating about just accepting everything as it is and doing NOTHING to change the underlying system. And these are NOT right wingers, Niall, they are allegedly left leaning progressives, which makes it even more of a barf. They waste and oppress no less than their right-wing counterparts and suffer from as much denial of reality (just a different flavor ice cream).
Yes, the disempowered have a much more difficult time responding to a system that imprisons them, but that is because they lack the resources (currently paper money wealth) to battle it. It is those who HAVE those resources and continue to sit on their lazy, selfish and self-involved arses, waving off our real need to change with their crippled hands that really irks.
'They should shoot the lot of them' but never any substantive ideas in how they would replace the status quo. We all hear the subjective soap box scenarios daily - rantings and mutterings. Also 'shooting' is violent force again!
Enforcing the enforcers (force/threats again) - but who monitors them to keep the corruption from always rearing it's ugly head everywhere?
Ideologies again.
Perhaps we need a combination of wisdom, (elders and philosophers)? The Sott Team! Lol
In an ideal world we wouldn't need, but would still have a kind of hierarchy I guess.
We should call the source the "Psy Op Blog."
I hope no one takes anything said in this article seriously. It certainly doesn't deserve to be.