LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK AND JOE QUINN
Since the 9/11 attacks, no book has provided a satisfactory answer as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately responsible for carrying them out - until now.
"Overall, the United States is sitting on approximately 1.442 trillion barrels of recoverable oil deposits."[Quote] Define 'recoverable deposits'. Do they include tar sands & oil shale that require strip mining? How expensive are they to refine. It isn't just OIL,it's also CHEAP oil. That's why the Middle East is,"THE prize"[Quote-Dick Cheney]. The Middle East sits on 'Sweet' crude that's easily extracted & cheap to refine. That's why we're there.
. . . where we were presented with an hour-long series of YouTubes on low-ish percentage rate exponential growth. Much time was spent on how much oil reserve means how consumption over how much time. Numbers such as those above were shown to be complete nonsense, mere fantasy.
The article appeared here about two months ago . . .
i remember that math lesson too Optics, [[Link]
But this oil stuff is bs or so i think, meaning i tend to go with the abiotic theory of oil. That said, knowledge of the exponential function can be utilized in the wrong way.
James McCanney on the real source of the world's oil reserves:
"We do not have to fight a war in the mid-east for oil, as it is found the world over and in abundance. It is not the result of millions of eons of decaying plant life. If it were, where were the fern forests that grew under the oceans?! I have yet to see any chemist show how dirt decays and transforms into crude oil and natural gas. There are literally oceans of oil all over the Earth. It ARRIVED ON Earth as part of multiple large-scale pollution events from passing large comets. It is not a rare or limited commodity, and it is not the rare substance controlled by just a few elite people. There are better ways of powering our need for energy (e.g. tapping into the solar electric field as Tesla was doing for free). The real reason we should cease using oil is because it pollutes the environment."
[Link]
...a reliable source of scientific information.
He has a PhD in Political Science from Harvard. He has written books on many controversial topics, and though I have not read any of them, I get the impression that they were written mostly to muddy the waters.
It is a scientific fact that the use of petroleum products for fuel produces pollutants, as well as CO2. I don't believe burning oil is a sustainable practice.
I don't care how much oil exists; the argument against using oil as a primary fuel, I think, is valid.
I don't know if this is true, but it is compelling.
Regardless of whether oil is in unlimited supply, the toxic effects of it's use are beyond debate. Other, non-polluting sources of energy must be supported.
I suspect that the lower costs of easy to extract oil is a big motivator in overseas production as well as lower regulations on safety, toxicity and labor.
It could easily be that the denial of "war for oil" serves simply as a distraction to mask the profiteering for (or pillaging of) other natural resources (land, minerals, national industries, etc.) , cheap labor and corporate alliances/marketing.
Comment: L Fletcher Prouty also had some interesting things to say about the origins of oil: