OF THE
TIMES
I realise "they" want absolute control, I'm not disputing that at all. If not these data centres, they will try something else. They will never be...
You know what these fools - Starmer and his ilk are clueless about. Word of mouth is WAY more powerful than social media. Close it down you fools...
Let me share this - Tolkien wrote it: [Link] - via Lew Rockwell... Gandalf and Frodo: Malcom Guite: Video
Goodish Article I pulled all my funds out in 1994 cause I didn’t trust firms with arseholes like fink at the helm Iran may take Saudi Arabia’s and...
Admit there is something beyond their control and understanding? Doubtful.
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE

As readers of this site may know there has been at least one other allegation from "someone who should know" that the recent Bin Laden killing was a hoax.
For some time now, Alex Jones has been quoting physician Steve R. Pieczenik, a former government consultant and Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, that he knew from CIA sources that Bin Laden had Marfan Syndrome and could not have survived past the end of 2001.
Another talk show regular has been reporting that his CIA contacts told him that Bin Laden died in early 2002. Now this guy, also ex-CIA, tells us it was 2006.
So the CIA is sure he died of natural causes, but not sure when.
And we are also told that the CIA was instrumental in this latest Bin Laden "death."
So all that is clear to me, besides it being almost a sure bet that Bin Laden is by now really deceased, is that the CIA has been trying to control the "spin" on the Bin Laden story ever since they acquired him as an asset (Tim Osman) in 1986.
But the CIA is a kind of group dramatization of a psychopath - will tell any lie necessary to accomplish what it wants. So why should we count on any "facts" that cite the CIA as their source?
Seems to me they lost their credibility decades ago.