The first time I saw this video. It shook me up but good! Life has not been the same since then.

In addition to the impossible lack of physical plane parts and damage patterns in the building facade to support the contention that a 757 struck the Pentagon, the stated directional approach and path of the aircraft as claimed by the official report has also been thoroughly discredited:

Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis actually conducted their own investigation and interviewed several eye witnesses who corroborate a North side approach of the aircraft, as opposed to the official South Side with the downed light poles etc. From this evidence, it appears that indeed a large passenger aircraft was witnessed flying low toward the Pentagon, but from its observed flight path and direction it could not possibly have struck the Pentagon where the damage appears. Instead, the evidence shows that it made a coordinated low-altitude flyover at the same moment the blast occurred on the side of the Pentagon, and was seen flying away by other witnesses on the other side. On the incoming side, the witnesses did not actually see the impact at the Pentagon, but many interpreted the simultaneous appearances of the aircraft and explosion as a plane crash.

It is unknown what caused the blast. It could have been an A3 missile, but just as well could have been pre-planted explosives. We don't have to know what hit the Pentagon in order to know that the official story is complete nonsense. A fully funded, independent, transparent, new investigation might be able to discover what really happened.

The Ranke / Marquis video can be seen here: [Link]

didn't SOTT posted an article debunking the kinky "no plane theory" which was part of the elaborate COINTELPRO campaign SOTT is so good exposing?

I passed through an article too quickly and misunderstood it

serve me right for getting up too early
My comment was meant to be related to BBC bias and such, so hope it will be taken like this. wrong story, above but right comment.Time for another cup of tea!!!

Where did they get the video of the projectile crashing into the Pentegon? All other videos where confiscated? That one appeared to be on Pentegon property.

Question:

"Where did they get the video of the projectile crashing into the Pentegon?"

Answer:

I believe you will find the answer to that question by doing the economic forensic research into several security firms particularly ADT Security Systems, originally American District Telegraph now also known as ADT Fire and Security or simply ADT, is a division of Tyco International and a worldwide supplier of electronic security systems, fire alarm systems, communication systems, and integrated building management systems.

It is alleged ADT Systems hacked into emergency dispatchers on 911. Evidence exists agents installed ADT CO2 monitoring devices in public buildings and transportation systems so unwitting targets would trigger what are called 'Kaya cat [catastrophe]bonds' with the wireless transmission of a death sentence per the signals used to demolish the WTC Twin Towers on 9/11. Lord Michael Ashcroft’s company Hawley, purchased ADT Security Systems in 1987, the largest electronic security company in the United States. In 1989, Lord Michael Ashcroft’s firm ADT Security Systems acquired a 45 year contract for the security of the United States and British Governments.

It is here you can begin to penetrate the mechanisms in place structured well before the events of 9/11. AON Corporation and Cantor Fitzgerald, two corporations that needed to disappear so the Magic Circle Jerks and their clients could inherit the windfall profits not made in the NY-Chicago short-selling fraud that netted $1.5 trillion. Suck Co2 friends because these psychos are getting ready to cap our asses at 350ppm.

Question:

"So, TWA 800, through a series of problems, happened to find itself at the right altitude, a restricted altitude, within the parameters of the experiment. Anything further on this?"

Answer:

It is first important to analyze carefully the history of recent aircraft 'accidents' such as Adam Air 574, Kenya 507, Colgan 3407, Air France 447 and TWA800. All these aircraft were illegally equipped with GRS11 Gyrochips and uniteruptible autopilots which can be hacked into through the Ku-Band satellite signals. The second critical analysis should be given to every single passenger on these aircraft and consider a level of 'priority targets.' When these aircraft are blown out of the sky these aircraft and passengers are insured with the alleged assassination, sabotage and deception teams sharing in what are known as 'bordereaux insurance' frauds. Think of it as an extremely complex hybrid type of military grade killing machine embedded in private networks linked to extremely powerful people and corporations, i.e., investigate the passengers killed on Air France 447 (an amazing list of well connected people to corporations competing for contracts on resources).

By the way, Hillary Clinton was a patent lawyer at the Rose Law firm in Arkansas and it was this firm that did the patent work on the QRS 11 Gyro Chips.

Try this on for size; Google again: 'Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot + QRS 11 + KU band + Smacsonic'

I believe you will find TWA800 mentioned in this law suit, which by the way, is the only law suit being brought against the 'circle jerks' responsible for 9/11:

DRAFT 45 PREAMBLE FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDY TO PRIVATE-EQUITY RACKETEERING AND TWO-PARTY CORRUPTION IN GLOBAL GUARDIAN 9/11
[Link]
Enjoy the music the Circle is Small:
[Link]
Note: Don't let yourself get distracted by this nonsense about a mosque being built in New York either; this is classic Hegelian scientific application of psychological warfare.

But who and how many are ready to do that?

Maybe this comment will be a little out of the topic, but.
For the first time since ages, I feel dispressed! Maybe it's the weather outside.

It was a time, I was thinking there were smart and stupids people, and you can easyly imagine that I was seeing myself as a smart one.
Until something happened to me and made me suddenly see in the dark side of my thoughts and saw right that in fact, following my own criterias, I was completly stupid, as brainless.

So all changed, and since that time I think there is no stupid or smart people, there are more or less informed people.
It's sad but we could change it, beeing curious, a little openminds, and to not be afraid to look at behind the stage of this giant church theaters that are our mainstream medias and western schools.

But what dispress me now, is not that, is the fact that so much people don't want at all to look at the facts and so the truth.
They could see right, but they refuse to look at the facts! People who were so well blinkered that they could hate you if ever you ask them to "open a little the blinkers".
The most blind are the ones who don't want to see and that is the saddest.

Thanks you all here , at least you help me to never have to use antidepressant pills ;-)

Asking questions is not a crime, hidding evidence is. Wonder why government agencies quickly siezed and never released surrounding survelance video? Is it true that such a large jet flying at such speed would have caused a path of turbulent destruction along the ground?
Jessie Ventura is a good leadman to ask questions and wonder why "big brother" gets so upset when contradictory testimony is presented.

when I first got on the internet in January of 02 seeing that video. I was on h2g2 and saw a conversation on the subject. I was already looking for clues prior to that, as the field fire in Pa. did not convince me a plane hit that spot. I will have to say it took me a really long time to figure out the whole scam though.

There's no way to verify anything about that video or the motives of the people who provided it. And those quotes . . . , "It sounded like a missile." Even if witnesses really said things like that, what does that prove? What does a missile sound like anyway??
On 9/11 my younger brother was working in a government bldg near by on a slight rise overlooking the Pentagon. His office window faced the Pentagon. He saw the plane hit the building. I believe him. My oldest brother was in the Air Force at the time and was stationed at the Pentagon, and my younger brother's first thought was, "Oh, my God! My brother's in there!"
I love coming to this website because I like hearing a different points of view -- the kind you never see treated seriously on TV but that make as much sense (sometimes more) than what is being reported. I agree with a lot of what I read here. In this case, I can't claim any kind of expertise on the subject. I have done zero research on the specifics of what happened at the Pentagon that day. As it turned out, my oldest brother was at meetings over 10 miles away when the plane hit. I do know a plane hit the bldg because I know and trust someone who saw that happen.

The most secure building on the planet and all the liars can come up with is 3 frames which show nothing.

It's obvious that this is a coverup from the gitgo. I've often wondered how a 20 dia. hole could swallow up a 47ft wide fuselage including wings, tail, 12 dia TITANIUM rotors, seats luggage, passengers and just disappear into 'vaporization'.

But I AM the king of Kashmir so I guess it's possible.