OF THE
TIMES
All my life I have been told there was coming three days of darkness at the end of the world. Is darkness merely lack of light, or could it be...
"Normalization imposed by American diktat, without justice for Palestinians and for the Iranians, will not hold." Does Trump, or anyone in his...
Time ffh or action…what action is proposed ?
AND nothing will happen….
There's more states than that doing this.
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
The entire argument about aquaculture impacting the harvesting of wild fish for fish meal production is not valid. The production of fish meal, world wide, has been almost constant for the last 3 decades, during which aquaculture has gone from almost zero production to 50% of the seafood market. The only change has been the shift of the market for fish meal producers from chicken, pig and cattle feed to fish/shrimp feed markets. A world wide ban on the use of fish meal in aquaculture diets, would only shift the market back to chicken and pig feed, with no change in the harvest rate of wild fish for fish meal production. Fishermen have been harvesting at the maximum sustainable rate for decades, and that won't change.