The polonium allegedly used to kill Alexander "Sasha" Litvinenko has now been traced not only to the dead mans' own home and that of Russian Oligarch in exile Berezovsky, but also to the headquarters of "security and risk management company", Erinys International. "Security and risk management company" is
simply a politically correct name to describe those companies that hire and
then rent out ruthless mercenaries to carry out the US government's dirty work
in Iraq - the murder of any Iraqi who gets in the way of the US corporate looting
of Iraq's wealth.
Such "private" firms are required because, to use US or British troops to protect US and European big business operations in Iraq would immediately expose the real reason for the Iraq invasion. Of the dozens of such "security and risk management" companies currently with their hands in the Iraq cookie jar, the vast majority were established since the US invasion of Iraq. No coincidence there.
One of the founders of Erinys is Sean Cleary, a South African and ex-Apartheid
era official. Sean Cleary is closely linked with Jonas Savimbi, leader
of the UNITA rebel movement in Angola. (take note of the mention of
Angola, it comes back to haunt us later). Erinys has its headquarters in the
CIA/MI6/Mossad international drug-running, human-trafficking, money-laundering
playground of Dubai. In the summer of 2003, Erinys was awarded
an $80-million contract to provide security for Iraq's oil infrastructure.
Today, Erinys has more than 15,000 employees and is the
biggest employer in the private security business in Iraq.
In 2003, Cleary left Erinys and was replaced by Alastair Morrison.
Alastair Morrison spent the 1990's running a private security firm named Defence
Systems Limited (DSL) with Richard N. Bethell. In 1997, Major General Stephen
Carr-Smith, a senior staffer, explained that the company's clients included "petrochemical
companies, mining or mineral extraction companies and their subsidiaries, multinationals,
banks, embassies, non-governmental organizations, national and international
organizations - those people who operate in a very dodgy, hostile type of environment." Translating
this from corporate speak we understand that such companies are used to create "very
dodgy, hostile types of environment" in certain nation states as a way to effect
big business-sponsored coups. DSL also provided "counter-insurgency"
training for security forces in Sri Lanka, Papua New Guinea and Mozambique.
(Again, take note of the mention of Mozambique).
Richard N. Bethell is an ex British SAS
soldier who worked with Tim Spicer, who is a former officer with the Scots
Guard, an "elite" regiment
of the British military and who has been investigated for illegally smuggling
arms and planning military offensives to support mining, oil, and gas operations
around the world. On
May 25 2004, the US Army Transportation command awarded
Spicer's company, Aegis Defense Services, the contract to coordinate all the
security for Iraqi reconstruction projects. The Aegis "security and risk
management" company
grabbed the headlines last year with the release of video taken by "security
contractors" in Iraq which showed them arbitrarily firing on and killing
Iraqi civilians in their cars. Bethell, who is nicknamed 'Tarzan' because of
his long blond locks, personally organized a training mission of the Colombian
police's elite force in 1990. Training Colombian police forces...hmmm...
now where have I heard that before:
From my article Litvinenko:
By Way of Deception part 2:
In 2002, at the same time as Scaramella says he was completing his duties
for the ECPP, he also started a school of national security in Colombia to
train local police.
Scaramella, you will remember, lunched with Litvinenko in a London Sushi bar
on November 1st this year, immediately after which Litvinenko began to feel
ill, dying three weeks later.
Other Erinys employees, charged with training the local Iraqi guards, included
two South Africans who served as secret police in the apartheid regime. One
of the men, Francois Strydom, was killed earlier this year when a bomb exploded
outside Baghdad's Shaheen Hotel. The other, Deon Gouws, was seriously injured
in the same explosion.
Strydom was a member of Koevoet, a notoriously brutal counterinsurgency
arm of the South African military that operated in Namibia during the neighboring
state's fight for independence in the 1980s. Gouws, who was a former officer
in South Africa's Vlakplaas, a secret police unit, received amnesty application
from the Truth And Reconciliation Commission after admitting to between 40
and 60 bombings of political activists' houses in 1986; a car bombing that
claimed the life of KwaNdebele homeland cabinet minister and African National
Congress activist Piet Ntuli; and an arson attack on the home of Mamelodi doctor
Fabian Ribiero.
One thing I forgot to mention about the abovementioned
Richard N. Bethell who consorts with such types; he also happens to be the
sixth Baron Westbury. British 'nobility' indeed.
Soon after the 2003 Pentagon security contract was granted to Erinys, the
company started recruiting many of its guards from the ranks of the "Free
Iraqi Forces", an Iraqi army group formed by CIA asset and Iraqi exile
Ahmed Chalabi, with funding from the Pentagon. This prompted allegations that
Erinys was creating a private army, which it was, but it was a private army
paid for by the Pentagon. Chalabi's "Free Iraqi Forces" are made
up of tens of thousands of former Iraqi soldiers, policemen, security guards
and general scum bags who left the country for one reason or another during
the reign of Saddam Hussein. This private Pentagon army are responsible for
most of the "death squad" murders that have plagued Iraq for the
past two years. The goal of such apparently senseless mass murder is the forced
creation of the 'reality' of "civil war" between Iraq's Sunni and
Shia populations. The Pentagon desires "civil war" in Iraq for four
main reasons:
To distract, confuse and demoralise real Iraqi insurgents who are attempting
to evict US forces from Iraq.
To demoralise and traumatise Iraqi civilians, both Shia and Sunni in the hope
that they will turn against the insurgency and demand peace at any cost
To draw the real Iraqi insurgency's attention and fire away from US troops.
To allow the US government (at the behest of Israel) to declare that the only
solution to Iraq's "sectarian" violence is the division of the country along
religious and ethnic lines: Kurds in the North, Sunnis in the center and Shia
in the south.
Erinys' counsel in Baghdad has been Ahmed Chalabi's nephew, Salem Chalabi.
Not long after the "fall of Baghdad":
Salem Chalabi established the Iraq International Law Group (IILG), which
describes itself as "your professional gateway to the new Iraq." Assisting
Salem in setting up the IILG was a partner Marc Zell (the IILG's website
has been registered in Zell's name). Zell is an Israeli settler of the Gush
Emunim (Bloc of the Faithful) stripe. Here the plot thickens.
Zell had for many years been arch Neocon and Rabid Zionist Douglas Feith's
partner in their Washington-Tel Aviv law firm, Feith and Zell (FANDZ). Until
last year Feith was Under Secretary of Defense for Policy under Bush. FANDZ
had been set up when Feith left government (the first time) to pursue the
work of a "foreign agent" representing Turkey and some Israeli
interests.
Following the Baghdad opening of the IILG, Zell soon opened, in the U.S.,
an office for Zell, Goldberg & Co., which promises to assist "American
companies in their relations with the U.S. government in connection with
Iraq's reconstruction projects." It is interesting to note that Zell,
Goldberg still uses the website FANDZ, the site of the old Feith and Zell
firm. So when Zell boasts his connections to government, businesses know
exactly what is meant.
In the relatively short period of time since the fall of the Ba'ath Party
regime, IILG and Zell, Goldberg have facilitated contracts in the tens, possibly
hundreds of millions of dollars.
Feith and Chalabi were at the forefront of the plundering of Iraq's resources
in order to fill the coffers of American and Israeli big business. Feith also
promised the Israelis and their U.S. supporters that, not only would post-Saddam
Iraq trade with Israel, but it would resurrect the Iraq-Israel pipeline for
oil export.
Coming back to Litvinenko: for traces of Polonium, a biological weapon,
to be found found in the offices of a company founded by a former official
in the South Africa apartheid regime immediately raises red flags
Biowar
and the Apartheid Legacy
By Salim Muwakkil, In These Times
June 6, 2003
A two-part story in the Washington Post on April 20 and 21 2003 revealed that
biological agents developed by the South African government during its apartheid
days have fallen into private hands. Written by Post reporters Joby Warrick and John Mintz, the piece noted that unique, race-specific
strains of biotoxins were available on the world market - for the right price
or the right ideology.
[...] The top-secret program that [South African scientist] Basson directed was called Project Coast, and it lasted from 1981 to 1993. The South African National Defense Force created it at a time when the white-minority regime was under increasing threat by indigenous black South Africans. Daan Goosen, the former director of Project Coast's biological research division, told the Post he was ordered by Basson to develop ways "to suppress population growth among blacks" and to "search for a 'black bomb,' a biological weapon that would select targets based on skin color."
[...] The Washington Post even noted, "Goosen says many scientists kept copies of organisms and documents in order to continue work on 'dual-use' projects with commercial as well as military applications." A May 2002 story on Project Coast in the Wall Street Journal reported that Goosen said he has been "visited by scores of people looking for 'stuff to kill the blacks.'" Race-specific
weapons naturally are in hot demand among racists, so it's no surprise that
South Africa's race-specific research is highly coveted.
[...] Reported links between Israel's ethnic weapons and South Africa's Project Coast are tentative; some would say tenuous. But the possibility of such links is terrifying, and justifies as much scrutiny as was focused on Iraq's imaginary arsenal.
The Apartheid regime in South Africa was the work of the Boers, who were Dutch,
that is, white Europeans. Deep-seated racism was at the heart of the South
African apartheid regime, and it very clear that the current Zionist leaders
in Israel possess a very similar racism and hatred towards the Palestinians.
It is extremely interesting to note that the main Zionist leaders in Israel,
like their vanguard in Washington, are anything but Semitic. Many ordinary
Jews however, as Semitic as the Palestinians. Genetically speaking, they
are brothers. If the caucasian Zionist leaders hate Palestinians for their
race - their genetics as it were - how do they view Semitic Israeli Jews? Something
to think about in terms of the very perilous conditions the Zionist leaders
have carefully created for ALL people in the Middle East. Of course, if we
consider the fact that both American and Israeli leaders deliberately
murdered
almost 3,000 mainly white Americans on 9/11, we must ultimately conclude
that,
at the highest level, it is not a case of black versus white or Arab, but rather
the psychopaths in power against the rest of us.
Profile of Bilateral Relations
State of Israel
History of Relations
Israel established a Legation in South Africa in 1952 and in 1974 it was upgraded to an Embassy. In 1972 South Africa established a Consulate General in Tel Aviv which was upgraded to an Embassy in December 1975. Israel continued to enjoy close relations with the Apartheid Government in South Africa.
While many African countries had seen Israel as an ally in the fifties and early sixties, another country struggling to survive in a hostile climate, after the wars of 1967 and 1973, their view had changed and Israel was now the neighborhood bully. For more on this, see the article Africa,
Arabia, and Israel: Forty-Five Years of Relations.
South Africa had seen two of its neighbors become "Popular Republics" under Marxist-inspired "People's Armies" after the fall of the Salazar regime in Portugal in 1974. So both Israel and South Africa had a siege mentality, believing they were surrounded by enemies.
Africa, Arabia, and Israel Forty-Five Years of Relations
[...] In the wake of the 1973 Yom Kippur War between Israel and the joint forces of Egypt and Syria, almost all of sub-Saharan Africa broke off diplomatic relations with Israel completely. And in 1975, the Arab League states succeeded in passing a motion on the floor of the United Nations General Assembly, equating Zionism with racism and South African apartheid. It passed in large measure to the near-automatic support the resolution received from the sub-Saharan African states.
Although there is evidence that several African nations wished to maintain covert relations with Israel, privately insisting that its public condemnation of Israel was merely an act for show, designed to placate the Arab states, to many Israelis, this hypocrisy was an unimaginable slight that could not easily be forgiven. It was said that, in response to this overwhelming rejection, "Israel pursued its relationship with South Africa with an element of vindictiveness."
Israel and South Africa
excerpted from the book
Israeli Foreign Policy
by Jane Hunter
South End Press, 1987
Israel has also been connected with the mercenary forces deployed
by South Africa against Angola
and Mozambique. In the 1970s Israel aided the FNLA (Angolan National Liberation Front) proxy forces organized and trained by the CIA to forestall the formation of a government led by the MPLA (Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola-now the ruling party of Angola).
John Stockwell, who ran the CIA operation against Angola, recollected three arms shipments Israel made in cooperation with the CIA: a plane full of 120 mm shells sent via Zaire to the FNLA and Unita; a shipment of 50 SA-7 missiles (all of which were duds); a boat-load sent to neighboring Zaire in a deal that the Israelis had worked out with President Mobutu, even though the Zairian strong man had broken ties with Israel two years earlier.
Remember I said to take note of the mention of Angola and Mozambique? That
the founders of the biggest "security contractor" companies operating
in Iraq are veterans of operations there? What are we to make of the fact that:
Israel has also been connected with the mercenary forces deployed
by South Africa against Angola and Mozambique.
The Polonium used to kill Litvinenko was traced back to the security contractor
offices of a former South African apartheid official
who is closely associated
with a leader
of the UNITA rebel movement in Angola
and was also a partner of Alastair
Morrison who spent the 1990's running a private security firm named Defence
Systems Limited (DSL) with Baron Bethell
and that DSL provided "counter-insurgency"
training for security forces in Mozambique
added to the fact that the polonium was also traced to the offices of Russian
Oligarch Berezovsky, who happens to hold Israeli citizenship.
Before we decide, let's look closer at Israeli-South African connections:
South
Africa's Nuclear Policy
Ruchita Beri, Research Fellow, IDSA
The political changes in the Southern African region heightened the security
concerns of South Africa. The end of Portuguese rule in Africa after the
1974 Lisbon coup and the subsequent accession to power of Communist regimes
in Angola (MPLA) and Mozambique (Freelimo) enhanced the encirclement by Communist
forces regionally. The mid- 1970s also saw the intensification of the anti-apartheid
struggle within South Africa-in the apartheid government's perception, sponsored
by the Communist forces.
Thus, perceiving itself to be encircled by Communist forces, the
South African government promoted a militarist ideology legitimising the
use of force by the state to counter that threat, codified in the concept "Total National
Strategy" to coordinate its national security planning. This ultimately
involved a nuclear deterrent capability.
The arrival of Cuban troops in Angola after the establishment of the MPLA
regime provided the final stimulus. Defence Minister P.W. Botha spelled out
the defence requirements to meet this challenge as "South Africa can
establish a balanced defence force to defend itself against terrorism...and
this we are fully able to do....Secondly, we must have a deterrent to be
able to resist a fairly heavy conventional attack on South Africa."
This statement was quite ambiguous; however, one could reach the conclusion
that both conventional and nuclear capabilities would be pursued by South
Africa. Ambiguity became the trademark of the South African nuclear policy
in the apartheid era.
The attitudes of the two countries can be summed up by this comment from Jane
Hunter, cited above:
It has also been said that those arms sales are understandable, given the
striking similarities between the two countries in their day-to-day abuse
and repression of their subject populations, South African blacks and Palestinians
under Israeli rule; in their operating philosophies of apartheid and Zionism;
and in their similar objective situations: "the only two Western nations
to have established themselves in a predominantly nonwhite part of the world," as
a South African Broadcasting Corporation editorial put it. That understanding,
however, is somewhat superficial, and the focus on similarities of political
behavior has somewhat obscured the view of the breadth and depth of the totality
of Israeli-South African relations and their implications.
Another factor cementing the relationship was the embargo placed on South
Africa following the riots of 1975 and the international outcry over the death
of Stephen Biko.
South
Africa: 1962 - 1989
Access to Critical Events in Recent U.S. Policy Toward South Africa
The second period (1976-1980) deals primarily with the response of the U.S.
government and the international community to the South African government's
brutal reaction to the June 1976 student revolt, the death of Steve Biko
(the leader of the Black Consciousness Movement), South Africa's subsequent
security crackdown on opponents of apartheid and the adoption of the U.N.
Security Council Resolution that called for a mandatory arms embargo against
South Africa.
Because of this, South Africa was isolated, at least "officially",
from the world.
One of the projects Israel and South Africa undertook together was the development
of nuclear weapons. Hunter continues:
Israel's relations with South Africa are different than its interactions
with any of its other arms clients. That Israel gave South Africa its nuclear
weapons capability underscores the special nature of Tel Aviv's relations
with the white minority government and begins to describe it - a full-fledged,
if covert, partnership based on the determination of both countries to continue
as unrepentant pariahs and to help each other avoid the consequences of their
behavior.
Arms industry
Nuclear Apprentice
There are few areas where the respective needs and advantages of Israel
and South Africa dovetailed so perfectly as in the field of nuclear cooperation.
"The most powerful reason for Israeli willingness to bear the undesirable
consequences of expanded and more open trade with South Africa may be her
desire to acquire material necessary to manufacture nuclear weapons," wrote
a military analyst in 1980.' To that must be added Israel's great desire
to test the nuclear weapons it already had, and the attractions of South
Africa's vast territory and proximity to even vaster uninhabited spaces-the
Atlantic and Indian Oceans.
This cooperation is also discussed here:
Abstract:
Note: Details about the Blaauw case are provided in the Africa Confidential
article. ..... According to information released regarding the secret mid-1980s
extortion trial of Johann Blaauw, a brigadier in the South African army, South
Africa and Israel participated in four clandestine nuclear deals in the mid-1970s. Blaauw was found not guilty of trying to extort mining
concessions from Minister of Mines Fanie Botha in a trial in 1989 [1].
The first nuclear deal occurred in shortly after the Yom Kippur War in 1973
when "Benjamine," a member of the Israel Council for Scientific
Liaison, asked Blaauw to acquire South African yellowcake which Israel could
use for weapon-grade plutonium. ("Benjamine" is believed to be
Benjamin Blumberg, the head of the Israeli Intelligence division Lish Ka
l-Kishrei (Lakam) [2].)
After discussions with Gen. Hendryk van den Bergh, head of the Bureau of
State Security (BOSS), South African Prime Minister John Vorster eventually
agreed to sell 50 metric tons of yellowcake to Israel. The deal was handled
by Minister of Mines Fanie Botha, who replaced Piet Koornhog [Koornhof] after
Koornhog opposed the sale. Uranium Enrichment Corporation Chairman Ampie
Roux was also aware of the deal.
During his testimony, Blaauw said that "a high degree of confidence
was developing between the South African and Israeli governments which involved
the exchange of military technology, joint aeronautic ventures, and the supply
of 'know-how' by Israel to South Africa in regard to the manufacture of weaponry."
It is clear then that relations between the apartheid regimes in Israel
and South Africa were very close. Not only were nuclear weapons part of the
partnership, but strategy and tactics in dealing with their enemies, both internal
and external were also an important part of the collaboration. Jane Hunter
again:
The South Africans began teaching the lessons of Israel's 1967 war at their
maneuver school, and Israeli advisers began teaching the Boers the arts of
suppressing a captive population and keeping hostile neighbors off balance...
The white government's practice of domestic counterinsurgency combines
outright military brutality with the extensive use of informers and collaborators. It is impossible to know how many refinements of these age-old techniques
have been borrowed from the Israelis' occupation of the West Bank, Gaza,
and the Golan Heights.
The Israeli system of village leagues is obviously comparable to the hated
town councils imposed on segregated townships by the apartheid government.
The collective punishment employed by the Israelis, such as the destruction
of a whole family's home when one of its members is arrested as a suspect
in an act of resistance, has lately been matched by the recent South African
practices of sealing off townships, and assaulting entire funeral processions.
What is perhaps more salient is the South African victims' perceptions of
Israel's involvement in their oppression and how readily that perception
is communicated...
And when the population you are systematically trying to annihilate fights
back, how do you justify it? Why, you call it "terrorism" of course!
Hunter continues:
The Frontline States
The South Africans noted that their May, 1983 aerial attack (dubbed Operation
Shrapnel) on Mozambique's capital, Maputo, was analogous to Israel's
attack on Beirut the previous summer. One analyst, Joseph Hanlon, believes
that one of South Africa's objectives in the attack was to see how its
version of events would play in the media. It was received very well indeed, according
to Hanlon, with the Western press accepting South Africa's claim that its
attack was in "retaliation" for an ANC attack and that ANC "bases" were
hit.
Instead, the South African Air Force hit a child-care center and
private houses with "special fragmentation rockets," leaving
6 dead and 40 wounded. This follows the Israeli practice in Lebanon of
speaking about PLO installations while civilians are the actual targets,
and attacking with particularly heinous anti-personnel weapons-cluster
bombs and phosphorous bombs. [...]
The model provided by Israel, which punishes every internal act
of resistance and violent act outside its jurisdiction with a bombing raid
on Palestinian targets in Lebanon-almost always refugee camps cynically
identified by the Israelis as "terrorist bases" or "headquarters"-
has served South Africa well. In January 1986, the white government's
radio delivered a commentary on "the malignant presence" of "terrorism" in
neighboring states and said "there's only one answer now, and that's
the Israeli answer." [...]
Israeli Defense Minister Ariel Sharon was personally involved in
the organization, training and equipping of "commando" units of the army of Zaire,
especially organized for missions along the borders of the RPA [Angola].
In 1984, the Financial Times (London) wrote of "joint Israeli-South
African support for Unita forces." Other sources also report the transfer
of Israeli arms and financial support to Unita.
In 1983, Angola's President Jose Eduardo dos Santos told Berkeley, California
Mayor Eugene (Gus) Newport that an Israeli pilot had been shot down during
a South African attack. The Angolan President showed Newport pictures of
captured Israeli weapons. The following year, Luanda reported the capture
of three mercenaries who said they had been trained by Israeli instructors
in Zaire.
Israel has also been involved with the Mozambican "contras," the
South African-backed MNR (Mozambique National Resistance or "Renamo"),
which has brought great economic and social distress to Mozambique. Renamo
has a particular reputation for ideological incoherence, being regarded by
most other right-wing insurgencies as a gang of cutthroats. For several years
there have been stories coming from Southern Africa of captured mercenaries
of Renamo who say they were trained in neighboring Malawi-one of the four
nations to maintain relations with Israel after the Organization of African
Unity (OAU) declared a diplomatic embargo in 1973-by Israelis. And more than
one report has told of "substantial Israeli aid" to the MNR, thought
to have been funded by the CIA and Saudi Arabia as well as South Africa and
former Portuguese nationalists.
Two countries, both with the mentality of the "besieged", begin
carrying out attacks against their neighbors under the cover of "defence".
Sometimes "to see how its version of events would play in the media".
In fact, it looks as if they were field-testing the strategies and tactics
that the Israeli Zionists along with Bush and Blair are now imposing
upon the US population and the rest of the world. Can you say "mind programming
by way of the threat of phony terrorism", or "by way of deception"?
Remember the days before 9/11, when anti-globalization forces
were growing stronger and the Zionist state of Israel was finding itself more
and more isolated because of its continued butchering of Palestinians in
the period following Sharon's provocative visit to the Temple Mount in September
2000 which "sparked the second Intifada"? On the 6th September 2001, a Conference
Against Racism was held in South Africa:
Israel
and US walk out of UN conference on racism
By Chris Marsden
6 September 2001
The joint US-Israeli walkout from the United Nations conference on racism
in Durban, South Africa was something of a foregone conclusion. It was a
stage-managed affair, the purpose of which was to portray all opposition
to the Zionist state's persecution of the Palestinians as inherently racist.
The original draft resolution to the UN conference stated its "deep
concern" at the "increase of racist practices of Zionism and anti-Semitism" and
spoke of the emergence of "movements based on racism and discriminatory
ideas, in particular the Zionist movement, which is based on racial superiority." It
made direct criticisms of Israeli repression against the Palestinians on
the West Bank as a "new kind of apartheid, a crime against humanity."
The US and Israel insisted on the removal of any direct reference to Israel.
[...] Israel has also achieved some success in winning a more friendly
response from Russia, which is again seeking to challenge US domination of
Middle Eastern affairs by offering itself as an honest broker between Israel
and the Arab regimes. During the Durban conference Sharon visited
Moscow for talks with President Putin to discuss the common threat posed
by Islamic terrorism. Sharon has even indicated sympathy for Russia's bloody
suppression of Islamic rebel forces in Chechnya and the possibility of a
further one million Jewish immigrants from Russia to Israel, armaments and
other trade deals.
[...]Shimon Samuels, the head of the Jewish caucus in Durban, declared, "We
saw an NGO document that would have made [Hitler's Nazi Party propaganda
chief] Goebbels happy. And now it is clear that we are going to see, at the
end of the government conference, resolutions that can be called the UN's
Mein Kampf."
Mordechai Yedid, Israel's official spokesman at the conference, insisted
there could be no condemnation of Israel in the resolution. He told the plenary
meeting prior to the US-Israeli departure, "anti-Zionism, the denial
of Jews the basic right to a home, is nothing but anti-Semitism, pure and
simple." Yedid derided the Arab regimes proposals to
criticize Israel's treatment of the Palestinians as "a group of states for whom the terms
'racism', 'discrimination', and even 'human rights' simply do not appear
in their domestic lexicon". The UN resolution, he continued, was "the
most racist declaration in a major international organization since World
War Two".
His remarks prompted a walkout by Egypt's Foreign Minister Ahmed Maher,
who represents one of the most pro-US of all the Arab states.
Announcing its withdrawal from the conference, US Secretary of State
Colin Powell denounced any attempt to single out "only one country
in the world, Israel, for censure and abuse'" and any suggestion that
apartheid existed in Israel. For his part, Israeli Foreign Minister
Shimon Peres proclaimed, "We
were portrayed in an insulting and baseless manner as a colonial nation.
The Arab League, all of it, has come out against peace."
The right-wing media in Israel marched to the same tune. An article in the
September 4 Jerusalem Post by Yossi Olmert described the Durban conference
as "the mirror image of the Nuremberg rallies, in which the Nazis propagated
their anti-Jewish messages, striving hard to delegitimise the Jews, as an
inevitable step leading to their eventual liquidation." He conceded
reluctantly that "not all the participants in Durban are Nazis, maybe
not even a majority of them, but too many are, and they clearly give this
shameful gathering its true character".
When exposed, the natural response of the psychopathic type is to wax indignant
and accuse others of that which he himself is guilty.
Did you happen to
notice the
date of this conference? Five days later the world would explode. The field
trials carried out for
thirty years by the Israelis and South Africans would be implemented throughout
the world. The battle against "terrorism" would become the justification
for imposing the New American-Israeli Tyranny on the world.
The most important
thing to note in the above however, is not that Zionist politicians were again
trying to equate anti-Zionism with hatred of Jews, but rather the mention of
Sharon and Putin and their little chat:
"During the Durban conference Sharon visited Moscow for talks with
President Putin to discuss the common threat posed by Islamic terrorism.
Sharon has even indicated sympathy for Russia's bloody suppression of Islamic
rebel forces in Chechnya and the possibility of a further
one million Jewish immigrants from Russia to Israel, armaments and other trade
deals."
We wonder what advice Sharon had to give Putin in combating the "common
threat posed by Islamic fundamentalism". Perhaps he warned Putin not to
become complacent in the face of the "Islamic Chechen extremists". After all,
Sharon and the Zionists understand what makes Islamic terrorists tick. Maybe
Putin should have heeded Sharon's warning, because just 3 years later, in September
2004, "armed militants" seized a school in the southern Russian town of Beslan,
taking more than 1,000 hostages. The militants demanded Russian troops leave
nearby Chechnya in much the same way that other "Islamic terrorists" have pointedly
shouted "Allahu Akbar" or made demands for the US to leave Iraq or Israel to
leave Palestine before bizarrely murdering innocent people, sometimes their
own people. Three days after the Beslan siege began, it ended in an explosion
of violence that left hundreds dead, including many children. Indeed, in the
aftermath of the Beslan massacre, Sharon was quick
to capitalise on the tragedy, stating:
"Last Friday,
the entire world was shocked by the horrific massacre that was perpetrated
by terrorists in Russia. It has been proven again that terrorism does not distinguish
between blood and blood, between adults and children. Israel, which has been
struggling against terrorism for many years, stands alongside the Russian people
and sends its condolences."
For his part, Putin took a different stance, blaming
the attack on "foreign foes seeking to tear apart Russia
and corrupt officials."
On November
27, 2004,
the Interfax news
agency reported Alexander Torhsin, head of the parliamentary commission,
as saying that there was "evidence of involvement by a foreign intelligence
agency." He declined to say which, but said "when we gather enough
convincing
evidence, we won't hide it".
I wonder to whom Putin and Torshin were referring. Sadly, it seems that more
powerful forces than Putin or Torshin were at work here, forces that
preferred that the name of the "foreign intelligence
agency" remains private. When the parliamentary commission
released their official report two months later, all
it found was that
"Russian and Beslan government officials did not do all their best to prevent
the attack."
Interestingly, the Chechen separatist leader Aslan
Maskhadov immediately denied that his forces were involved.
A few days later, Shamil
Basayev, another Chechen separatist, issued a statement claiming responsibility
for the siege. Before he could be captured and brought to trial however, Basayev
was killed in July 2006, and while Russian FSB agents claimed responsibility
for his death,
a pro-rebel website said Basayev
and three other militants died when a lorry carrying explosives blew up accidentally.
Dead men tell no tales, as they say, neither do they tell for whom they were working.
In recent years Zionist leaders have been loudly declaring that "anti-Semitism
is on the rise" and that the only safe place for Jews is within Israel's illegal
borders. The primary 'evidence' for this claim is the 'reality' of 'Islamic
terrorism', be it Arab, Chechen or "al-Qaeda".
It should be clear then that Private Security and risk management companies
such as Erinys are intricately connected to the British, American and Israeli
governments, their intelligence agencies and therefore the banking and corporate
cartels that control those (and most other) governments. Behind these cartels
are the Russian, American and British Oligarchs, people like Berezovsky, Lord
Bell and a plethora of other "aristocratic" establishment figures.
It then becomes clear that the tracing of the polonium
used to kill Litvinenko to the British headquarters of the security contractor
company Erinys is an indirect, yet very tangible link back to the real power
behind the British government.
For such people, nationality has little if any significance, because
nationality is a very human concept and they, being psychopaths, rightly see
themselves as very different from the masses of ordinary humanity. At present,
these Oligarchs are engaged in what can only be termed 'domination of the globe',
an 'art form' they have been successfully practicing for many, many years.
What we are dealing with in such types is 'deviant humanity' - psychopathy
- human beings with no other reason to live than to manipulate, control and if needed, kill
the rest of us. Central to the plans of this Pathocracy is "population
reduction",
something that has historically been achieved primarily through the deliberate
creation of needless war, which to them of course, is anything but needless.
So are we beginning to see a pattern here, albeit a rather complex one? A
snaking trail of deceit involving Israeli passport-holding Russian Oligarchs;
South African and Israeli apartheid; the production and trafficking of nuclear,
biological, chemical and ethnic specific weapons by those nations; the
participation of the US military and hired British, American, South African
and Dutch mercenaries to effect the overthrow of sovereign states by way of
manufactured false flag "terrorism", which is also used to drive a wedge between
the West and the Islamic world; all of which brings us full circle back to
nuclear, biological, chemical and ethnic specific weapons, and the final solution
plan of the last remaining "democratic" apartheid state: Israel.
|