Five Years On: It's Worse Than You Think
|
Henry See
September 11, 2006
Signs of the Times
|
Five years on, and most people still don't have a clue as to how bad the situation really is. Sure, some of them are awake enough to consider that 9/11 was an inside job...of the Bush government. They don't want to consider Israeli involvement.
Others insist on Israeli involvement, but they then want to turn 9/11 into a crusade against "the Jews". Certainly, elements from Israel, along with individual Jews from elsewhere, are among the responsible. Moreover, the entire concept of "the chosen people" is an inhuman and fundamentally anti-human idea, be it in its Judaic and religious form or in its secular and American form, and one can discern its voracious shadow lurking behind the fomenting of a religious war between Christianity and Islam. With each day that war, begun in deceit, is coming more out into the open.
The idea of keeping a group of people isolated and separated from their human brethren during thousands of years, subordinated to rules that reinforce the idea that they alone are the selected few of a vengeful and violent god and that the rest of us are merely "cattle" to be used for their own purposes, may have ends that are as sinister as the idea itself. Douglas Reed, a longtime journalist for the London Times, wrote a painstakingly researched history of the role of Zion he called The Controversy of Zion. If you want a glimpse behind the curtain, you need to read this book. But while reading it, keep in mind that Judah-ism alone isn't the culprit either, even if its caste of high priests appear to play a special role and have been playing that role for over two thousand five hundred years, a role well documented by Reed. Reed's work must be considered and understood in the context of a topic that we at Signs of the Times consider essential to a correct and balanced understanding of our world: psychopaths, pathocracy, and ponerology.
Over the last year, Signs of the Times has been bringing your attention to the question of Political Ponerology, the study of evil as adapted for political purposes. It broadens the political canvas to include a working knowledge of psychopaths and psychopathy, along with other forms of deviancy that serve and abet the psychopathic masters. And please understand that we are using the term psychopathy in its clinical sense; it is not being used as a epithet. Only by understanding this issue can sincere and devoted people of conscience avoid the pitfalls that arise by focusing solely on "the Jews", a trap into which too many have fallen.
Andrew Lobaczewski's book, Political Ponerology, the second must-read volume for those of you trying to get to the bottom of the horror that was September 11, 2001, is an in-depth analysis of the pathocratic network in Eastern Europe during the communist period, but his analysis and conclusions are, oh, so appropriate and necessary for an understanding of what is really happening in the English speaking world in particular today.
The false flag attacks of 9/11, as well as the subsequent attacks in Madrid, in London, as well as the so-called suicide bombings attributed to the Palestinians, blamed on Arabs and Islam, were orchestrated by pathocrats in the US, Israel, and Britain, the psychopathic shadow government that is actively seeking to take over our planet and to eliminate as many of the non-psychopaths as they can.
We know that this assertion sounds absurd. We know that it strikes many people as so over the top that most people will never be able to wrap their heads around it. After all, after decades of mainstream hate speech directed against the Arabs and against Muslims, we "know" that they are inhuman brutes willing to sacrifice themselves for their nefarious goals of world domination, right? Only, the real brutes behind this violence, both physical and propagandistic, are too smart to put themselves in danger. They project their own aims on their chosen victim, and in this case, the chosen victim are Arabs, Semites. Is that a coincidence?
The real perpetrators admit their own goals but ascribe them to others, a typical move for a psychopath.
Consider Lobaczewski's findings, based on decades of research carried out by a group of dedicated scientists in the Eastern bloc:
1: Psychopaths know that they are different from the rest of us, and they know they are "deviants" in regard to the rest of humanity. They have no empathy, no conscience. They mimic these behaviours because they know that they are "expected" to show remorse at certain times, concern and caring at others. They must wear what Hervey Cleckley, a man who spent his life researching psychopathy, called "the mask of sanity". But they have also understood that normal people, people with a conscience, people who are capable of feeling someone else's pain, can be manipulated through feelings of guilt and pity. Psychopaths are masters of playing and preying on us through that very quality of ours that is the most noble -- our conscience!
2: Psychopaths recognize other psychopaths. They are better at recognising the false emotions of other psychopaths. Of course, they know how the game works, how our emotions can be used against us, and so they can spot it a mile away. Normal people, who are more often than not the victims of their own emotions, blinded by their own emotions, have no idea that they are being used in this way. Psychopaths have one piece of information that the rest of us are lacking: they know that psychopathy and ponerology is real! They know that it exists, while we continue on blissfully unaware and our world is overtaken by a black cloud of violence, lies, and suffering.
3: Psychopaths band together to achieve their common goals. Recognising that their aims, as beings without conscience, are diametrically opposed to the aims of people with conscience, and fearing that a world based upon our values would be as fearful to them as their cold and relentless world is to us, they make common cause. You might consider this as the ultimate blood tie, an aristrocracy of evil, invisible and omnipresent, found in all peoples and cultures, working towards a common aim.
4: Psychopaths know that if their true nature were ever recognised and understood by non-psychopaths, they woulod be removed from all of the positions of power that they currently hold: in politics, business, banking, the law, the police, the military, the media, education, and on and on. Were the rest of us to one day really wake up, they would be gone, and our reality, now based upon and inspired by the conscienceless experience of reality that is the world of the psychopath, would be radically changed forever. They cannot allow this to happen, for it would mean their end, and at the moment they hold all the strings.
Let us consider these first four points. One of the arguments that is used by "conspiracy debunkers" arguing against the realistic idea, based upon observable fact -- as opposed to the "conspiracy" of the official story that is based upon nothing but the word of men and women who are known to tell lies -- that 9/11 was conceived and excecuted by pathocrats in Washington and Israel is that no such conspiracy as would be necessary to pull off 9/11 could possibly exist because someone would talk. Such a conspiracy could never be kept secret.
But think about points 1 to 4. A group of psychopaths, aware of their difference, aware of the life or death battle they are waging for their own survival (even if the rest of us have no suspicion that such a battle exists), who think of the majority of humanity as nothing but cattle or cannon fodder, and who have a profoundly different experience of reality itself, one that they share but which can never be communicated to those of conscience, would be bound together in ways that normal people could never comprehend. They know it is "us against them". They live it each day of their lives, and they have none of the moral brakes that would attentuate their plans, that would curb the lengths to which they would be willing to go to achieve their ends.
Can you really understand the horror of such a situation? Can you really see how much trouble we are in?
If you think so, then consider the next point:
5: Psychopaths can drug their victims much the way a predatorial animal drugs their prey, possibly through the emitting of certain pheremones that induce a muddled mind and foggy thinking. Lobaczewski writes:
As a result of ... naiveté and an inability to comprehend the crux of a matter, [the influence of the psychological deviant] easily anchors in human minds, traumatizing our psyches, impoverishing and deforming our thoughts and feelings, and limiting individuals' and societies' ability to use common sense and to read a psychological or moral situation accurately.
But then, there is other passage from Lobaczewski that goes into this effect in more detail:
When the human mind comes into contact with [the psychopath directly and with this reality] so different from any experiences encountered by a person raised in a society dominated by normal people, it releases psychophysiological shock symptoms in the human brain with a higher tonus of cortex inhibition and a stifling of feelings, which then sometimes gush forth uncontrollably.
The mind then works more slowly and less keenly because the associative mechanisms have become inefficient.
Especially when a person has direct contact with psychopathic representatives of the new rule, who use their specific experience so as to traumatize the minds of the "others" with their own personalities, his mind succumbs to a state of short-term catatonia. Their humiliating and arrogant techniques, brutal paramoralizations, and so forth deaden his thought processes and his self-defense capabilities, and their divergent experiential method anchors in his mind.
In the presence of this kind of phenomenon, any moralizing evaluation of a person's behavior in such a situation thus becomes inaccurate at best. Only once these unbelievably unpleasant psychological states have passed, thanks to rest in benevolent company, is it possible to reflect, always a difficult and painful process, or to become aware that one's mind and common sense have been fooled by something which cannot fit into the normal human imagination.
He is talking here of actual chemical changes in our brains from proximity to these pathogical types that distort and weaken our ability to think, be critical, and actually see and understand what is happening to us. Think about that for a moment. Normal humans have a natural predator among us who look like we do, can mimic our behaviour, and of whom we have no idea that they exist. An animal in the forest or on an African savannah is better equiped than we are. At least they know they have a natural predator!
One can also consider the media and the entertainment industry as channels of these "psychophysiological shock symptoms", on-going and everpresent, designed to keep the population in a state of repeated episodes of "short-term catatonia".
Zionism/Judah-ism and Ponerology, then, are two layers of what we might call the Great Conspiracy of 9/11. As bad as the situation is with just those two hidden truths, we must now, gentle reader, lead you to the third layer, admittedly one even further hidden in the murky shadows of history and current affairs, a topic in fact that is even more forbidden than the role of Zionism or the question of how many people died in German concentration camps, that of hyperdimensional realities.
George Gurdjieff explained our situation this way:
"There is an Eastern tale which speaks about a very rich magician who had a great many sheep. But at the same time this magician was very mean. He did not want to hire shepherds, nor did he want to erect a fence about the pasture where his sheep were grazing. The sheep consequently often wandered into the forest, fell into ravines, and so on, and above all they ran away, for they knew that the magician wanted their flesh and skins and this they did not like.
"At last the magician found a remedy. He hypnotized his sheep and suggested to them first of all that they were immortal and that no harm was being done to them when they were skinned, that, on the contrary, it would be very good for them and even pleasant; secondly he suggested that the magician was a good master who loved his flock so much that he was ready to do anything in the world for them; and in the third place he suggested to them that if anything at all were going to happen to them it was not going to happen just then, at any rate not that day, and therefore they had no need to think about it. Further the magician suggested to his sheep that they were not sheep at all; to some of them he suggested that they were lions, to others that they were eagles, to others that they were men, and to others that they were magicians.
"And after this all his cares and worries about the sheep came to an end. They never ran away again but quietly awaited the time when the magician would require their flesh and skins.
"This tale is a very good illustration of man's position."
Modern physics indicates that other dimensions or realities are necessary to make sense of the mathematics that explain the fundamental working of reality. A few bold physicists have gone so far as to speculate that these other dimensions may have more than a mathematical reality, they may have a certain physical reality (even if governed by different laws than those which govern our own world), which would offer a home to those figures of myth and legend, and even of certain religious texts, who seem to move effortlessly through space/time, who appear to have a knowledge of past and future impossible for a mere mortal, and who intervene in the course of human events in ways that are not necessarily always beneficial to mankind.
Laura Knight-Jadczyk's The Secret History of the World and How to Get Out Alive, the third book necessary for putting all the pieces of 9/11 together, discusses the question of hyperdimensions, both from a scientific and a mythological perspective.
Let us give an example from Douglas Reed's account of the Third Conference of the World Zionist Congress in 1903 to illustrate this point. At this Conference, Theodore Herzl made an offer to the assembled delegates of the country of Uganda as a homeland for the Jews. While accepted by the Western Jews, those of Sephardic descent who had to a great extent integrated within their host societies, it was rejected in a brutal way by the Eastern European, mostly Russian, Jews, the Ashkenazim, descendents of the Khazars. Reed picks up the story:
Dr. Weizmann describes Dr. Herzl's final humiliation. After the vote Herzl went to see the Jews from Russia, who had turned their backs on him and walked out, in their committee room. "He came in, looking haggard and exhausted. He was received in dead silence. Nobody rose from his seat to greet him, nobody applauded him when he ended. . . It was probably the first time that Herzl was thus received at any Zionist gathering: he, the idol of all Zionists".
It was also the last time. Within the year Dr. Herzl was dead, at the age of forty-four. No conclusion can be offered about his death. Judaist writers refer to it in cryptic terms. The Jewish Encyclopaedia says it was the result of what he endured and other authorities make similarly obscure, though significant, allusions. Those who during the centuries have been the object of anathema or excommunication by the ruling sect often have died soon and wretchedly. The student comes to feel that in this matter he approaches mysterious things, closed to all ordinary research.
The curious thing is that Herzl's intimate, right-hand man and leading orator saw the shape of things, at that time and to come, with complete clarity. He displayed a foreknowledge as great as that of Leon Pinsker when he depicted the series of events to which Pinsker's "irresistible pressure on international politics" would lead. At the very congress where Herzl suffered his humiliation Max Nordau (an alias or pseudonym; his name was Suedfeld) gave this exact prognosis:
"Let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl, the Zionist congress, the English Uganda proposition, the future world war, the peace conference where, with the help of England, a free and Jewish Palestine will be created" (1903). Here spoke the initiate, the illuminate, the man who knew the strength and purpose of "the international". [The Controversy of Zion, p. 207.]
The future world war, begun in 1914. The Peace Conference following that war, where the issue of Palestine was raised and settled in 1919, supported by the Balfour Declaration of 1917. As Reed puts it, the sincere researcher "approaches mysterious things, closed to all ordinary research." On this fifth anniversary of the declaration of war on normal people by the pathocrats, we suggest to our readers very strongly that the three books we have mentioned, The Controversy of Zion, Political Ponerology, and The Secret History of the World, are absolutely necessary for understanding all levels of the dire situation in which we find ourselves, as well as the dynamics and forces at play over the past thousands of years that have led us here.*
The only way out is to see the world as it is, no matter where that might take us. The enemy has been working at his plans longer than many of us can imagine. That means that the payoff must be huge. And you can be certain that the payoff is not in our best interests. Only the truth can honour those who died on September 11, 2001, killed by conscienceless predators who move invisible in our midst.
* An overview of these topics can also be found in our book on the attacks, 9/11: The Ultimate Truth, by Laura Knight-Jadczyk and Joe Quinn. The expanded and revised second edition will be out shortly.
|
|
![[Valid Atom 1.0]](/signs/images/valid-atom.png "Validate my Atom 1.0 feed")
