Amidst the corporate media feeding frenzy over the publication of caricatures
of the Prophet Muhammad in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten in September
and subsequently reprinted in European media and New Zealand in the past week,
one important element has apparently slipped under the wire—the complicity
of Danish imams who “circulated the images to brethren in Muslim countries,” according
to Charles
Moore, writing for the UK Telegraph. “When they did so, they included
in their package three other, much more offensive cartoons which had not appeared
in Jyllands-Posten but were lumped together so that many thought they had.”
Moore also finds it suspicious that there was no shortage of Danish flags
to burn. “I raise the question because, as soon as the row about the
cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed in Jyllands-Posten broke, angry Muslims popped
up in Gaza City, and many other places, well supplied with Danish flags ready
to burn…. Why were those Danish flags to hand? Who built up the stockpile
so that they could be quickly dragged out right across the Muslim world and
burnt where television cameras would come and look? The more you study this
story of ’spontaneous’ Muslim rage, the odder it seems.” Moore
also mentions Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, head of the International Association
of Muslim Scholars, who has called for an “international day of anger” in
response to the cartoons.
For Straussian neocons and their fellow “clash of civilization” (war
against Islam) travelers, al-Qaradawi is the perfect radical Muslim for their
propaganda purposes. He supports Palestinian suicide bombing and opposes negotiating
with Israel. According to the neocon and Jabotinsky Likudite organization MEMRI
(Middle East Media Research Institute), al-Qaradawi issued a fatwa calling
for the murder of all Americans in Iraq, both civilian and military (as it
turns out, al-Qaradawi never issued the fatwa and Straussian neocon lies are
legendary). It is also said the imam supports the execution of gay men, although
this point is of less importance to the Straussians who run foreign policy
in the United States.
As well, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi conforms to the Straussian claim that militant
Islam wants to take over the world and convert all infidels. “The influential
Qatar-based cleric is best known for his public support of the terrorist group
Hamas and his religious rulings applauding suicide bombings, positions which
caused the U.S. State Department in 1999 to bar him from entering the United
States,” the Boston
Herald reported in March, 2004. “Beyond that, however, al-Qaradawi
also promises that eventually Islam will prevail over all other religions and
a single Islamic state will rule the world…. Al-Qaradawi says some countries
will fall to the armed Islamic jihad, but in others, such as the United States,
victory will come through Da’awa—the teaching of Islam to non-Muslims—which
will trigger Westerners to convert to Islam…”
It is important to note that al-Qaradawi is a prominent figure in the Muslim
Brotherhood, an organization long ago penetrated by British and U.S. intelligence. “Dr.
John Coleman, a former British Intelligence agent,” explains Peter
Goodgame, “states in his report on Iran’s Islamic Revolution
that the Muslim Brotherhood was created by ‘the great names of British
Middle East intelligence’ …and that their mission was to ‘keep
the Middle East backward so that its natural resource, oil, could continue
to be looted.’”
Of course, we have little evidence that al-Qaradawi works for British and
U.S. intelligence, although plenty of other manufactured terrorists—from
Osama bin Laden (also known as “Osama
bin London”) and Gulbuddin Hekmatyar—are connected to the compromised
organization (along with Islamic Jihad and Hamas).
Once again cui bono—who benefits—enters the equation: Muslims
may burn off some of their outrage over what they see as a denigration (through
idolatry) of their religion, but at the end of the day the Straussian-Jabotinsky
Likudite coalition score big propaganda points as, once again, people in America
and Europe (who must be periodically reminded of the necessity for the “clash
of civilizations” agenda for total war) are incensed by the violence
spreading across the Middle East and are convinced that all Muslims are crazed
fanatics who must be ultimately dealt with.
|