Of course, these Zionist lobby groups and entities strongly reject such an accusation and publicly claim that, far from pursuing a personal agenda, they are motivated only to provide a safe haven for the Jewish diaspora - and publicly, we can expect nothing else from them. But privately, in the quietness of their own conscience or lack thereof, even people like Abe Foxman must surely recognize that the memories of the 6 million have been used and abused. But to people like Abe, even periodic abuse of Jewish suffering is a necessary evil if it ensures that it never happens again, and I might agree with him, if I thought for an instance, or if there were any evidence, that the Holocaust was really being used to safeguard the future of Jewish people.

The ugly reality is that 'Jewish lobby groups' are much more accurately described as 'Zionist lobby groups', and Zionism today poses the biggest existential threat to Jews since Nazi Germany. Indeed, it is a little known fact that Zionist leaders of the 1930's worked very closely with Nazi leaders to create the conditions under which the establishment of a 'Jewish homeland' on Palestinian land and the transfer of Jews to that 'homeland' became a 'necessity'. See Lenni Brenner's 51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis for historical data supporting this thesis.

That the state of Israel is the main source of the modern Middle East conflict and that 'Zionism' is entirely responsible for the creation of the state of Israel are not opinions but easily-proven facts. Less transparent however, but no less real, are the ways in which the Zionist state of Israel actively created the 'Arab terror threat' to Israel and the world, the part if played in encouraging the US invasion of Iraq and its role in the current push for an attack on Iran.

In recent days, we saw two examples of the shameless abuse of the Holocaust by 'Zionist' groups in an attempt to speed 'regime change' in Iran.

On Friday 19th May 2006, a shocking article was published in  Canada's National Post daily entitled: "A color code for Iran's infidels". The author, Amir Taheri, claimed that the Iranian parliament had recently passed a law to:

"ensure that all Iranians wear standard Islamic garments designed to remove ethnic and class distinctions reflected in clothing, and to eliminate "the influence of the infidel" on the way Iranians, especially, the young dress. It also envisages separate dress codes for religious minorities, Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians, who will have to adopt distinct color schemes to make them identifiable in public.

Jews would be marked out with a yellow strip of cloth sewn in front of their clothes."

Not surprisingly, so-called 'Jewish' organizations were quick to respond and take advantage of what they saw as an opportunity for a propaganda coup, with Executive Director of American Jewish (Zionist) Congress Council for World Jewry (Zionism), Neil Goldstein, exclaiming with obvious excitement:

"Iranian President Ahmadnejad denies the Holocaust ever occurred, but closely follows the Nazi playbook as he forces Jews to wear yellow cloth and threatens to destroy Israel, just as the Nazis forced Jews to wear yellow stars as a prelude to implementing their program of genocide."

It took a letter from press attache of the Iranian embassy in Ottawa, Hormoz Qahramani, to the National Post for the story to be revealed for the sordid fantasy that it was, with the National Post laying the blame at the door of the article's author Amir Taheri.

Readers will understand when we say we were shocked to realize that Mr Taheri works for a company called Benador Associates, a "Public Relations, Media and International Speakers Bureau" with strong Neocon leanings and a list of NeoCon customers as extensive as the dark rings under Richard Perle's eyes. Jim Lobe sums up Benador Associates as follows:

"When historians look back on the United States war in Iraq, they will almost certainly be struck by how a small group of mainly neo-conservative analysts and activists outside the administration were able to shape the US media debate in ways that made the drive to war so much easier than it might have been… But historians would be negligent if they ignored the day-to-day work of one person who, as much as anyone outside the administration, made their media ubiquity possible. Meet Eleana Benador, the Peruvian-born publicist for Perle, Woolsey, Michael Ledeen, Frank Gaffney and a dozen other prominent neo-conservatives whose hawkish opinions proved very hard to avoid for anyone who watched news talk shows or read the op-ed pages of major newspapers over the past 20 months."

It should be noted that the author of the propaganda piece is an Iranian ex-patriate or 'exile', no doubt of the same ilk as the Iraqi 'exiles' like Ahmed Chalabi who deliberately fed lies and disinformation about Saddam's non-existent mobile chemical weapons factories to the US government and media, who happily spread the word. Would you accept and publish information from a notorious drunken liar? What if he threw in a little hint by calling himself "curveball"? Apparently you would if you worked for the New York Times or the Washington Post. In the end, we can only assume that Taheri's motivation for publishing what he knew to be an entirely fabricated story was provided by his dreams of a future top spot in a new Iranian government, something like advisor to Dick Cheney or Donald Rumsfeld perhaps.

The important point about this story is not the fact that it was quickly proven to be false, but rather that the fact that it was proven to be false is largely irrelevant because, by its mere publication, the story's message had been successfully lodged in the pliable minds of the masses - Ahmadinejad = Hitler. Jews are in mortal danger. Iran must be destroyed.

Neither content with nor shamed by the fake yellow labels story (and undoubtedly in an attempt to capitalize on it), today a group of avowed Zionists announced their plans to file a "genocide suit" against The Iranian PM:

A group of Israeli politicians and former diplomats plan to sue Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, accusing him of conspiring to commit genocide.

Ahmadinejad recently said Israel should be wiped off the map and dismissed the Nazi Holocaust as a “myth”.

Dore Gold, a former Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, said Ahmadinejad’s comments violated the 1948 UN Genocide Convention, to which Iran was a signatory.

"From our preliminary assessment, there’s no question that Ahmadinejad violated the genocide convention, which specifically addresses the issue of incitement to genocide,” Gold said.

The Israeli daily newspaper Yediot Ahronot today reported the suit would be filed in the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands.

The 'funny' thing about this suit is that Ahmadinejad did not say that Israel should be wiped from the map, and he did not deny the Holocaust, but then the truth never did figure prominently, or at all, in any claims made by 'Zionists'. 

The really alarming aspect all of this is that these 'Zionists' seem to realize, but not care, that needlessly igniting a war with 80 million Iranians and hundreds of millions more sympathetic Arabs in the Middle East is very obviously the real existential threat to Jews in Israel. All of which leads us inexorably to the conclusion that Zionist collaboration with the Nazis during WW II was the first phase of a decades-long two-part plan to shepherd the Jewish people into a position where Hitler's final solution could finally be accomplished. If Zionist entities masquerading as Jewish groups are permitted to continue to spread lies and propaganda that seem destined to turn the Middle East into a glass parking lot, while at the same time urging the world's Jews to migrate to Israel, the day of the "final solution to the Jewish problem" will continue to draw ominously every closer.