The Flight 11 hijacker was not Atta. Listen to this distinct Israeli voice:

"We have some planes. Just stay quiet and you'll be okay. We are returning to the airport."

Seconds later: "Nobody move. Everything will be okay. If you try to make any moves, you'll endanger yourself and the airplane. Just stay quiet."

Ten minutes after that: "Nobody move please. We are going back to the airport. Dont try to make any stupid moves."

The hijacker speaks as if he is facing the passengers and threatening them with a weapon, telling them not to make stupid moves. Who is flying the plane?

This man thinks that several airplanes are being "landed." This is exactly what neocon Zakheim's remote control gadget (or here and here too) is supposed to do with hijacked airplanes: land them safely against the hijackers' will.

The Israeli hijacker may be counter-terror agent/passenger Daniel Lewin or another Israeli who snuck on board with a forged/stolen Arab ID.

He probably did not know that Israeli "art students" (signal & demolition experts) on the ground were steering the planes into buildings.

Several Israelis have confirmed that the hijacker's voice is Israeli. The official claim that it is the Egyptian Atta is false. Egyptians who learn English in high school like Atta would have a specific accent and a lively flow (with added vowels like Italian). Also, Atta cannot have a German/Yiddish "r" sound. The hijacker does.

The Hijacker of Flight 11 was an Israeli who believed that he was being landed safely. He was watching the frightened passengers and telling them to "please" calm down.

For the glory of Israel. If not Lewin, another Israeli, or an Israeli art student's voice from the ground.

After the landing, he would escape prosecution as usual. The Israeli security company ICTS would swear that he was not a hijacker.

The hijacker is an Israeli, I heard it so many times. I have no doubt about it. Not an Arab, an Israeli. Positive.
www.govsux.com/Israeli_9-11_Hijacker%20.htm

The Nazis killed 6 million Poles and 20 million Russians including 7 million civilians by a variety of means. Three million Russian POW died from bullets, deliberate typhus infection and starvation.

Another three million members of the Polish intelligentsia (professionals, clergy, teachers, union and political leaders) were also murdered. The term "genocide" was first coined to refer to Poles. 200,000 Polish children with Aryan characteristics were sent to Germany for "Germanization." By 1944, 4.5 million Poles and Russians worked as forced laborers in Germany.

Why would the Nazis exempt the 5-6 million Jews in this region? The Jews were even lower than Slavs on the "untermensch," (subhuman) scale. Holocaust minimizers are in denial about the true character of World War Two.

In my view, their real objection is to the political exploitation, i.e. the immunity from criticism and prestige the Jewish Holocaust gives Zionists. They would be wiser to address this issue directly rather than pretend the Jewish Holocaust didn't take place. They could neutralize its propaganda value another way: by drawing attention to the pattern of Nazi-elite Jewish collaboration (Judenrat, Jewish police, Zionist).

Holocaust minimizers discredit themselves and advance the NWO agenda, which is to provoke a gratuitous confrontation between Islam and the Zionist West.

*The Historical Context*

The treatment of Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe depended on the changing Nazi relationship to host nations and allies. For example, the 5,000 Danish Jews were mostly unscathed because the Nazis wanted good relations with the Nordic Danes, and access to their farm produce. Unlike the Poles, the Danes were very protective of their Jews.

Nazi persecution was held in check as long as Hitler desired peace with England, or good relations with Russia. However the invasion of Russia June 22, 1941 signaled the beginning of a genocidal death struggle. In this war zone, Slavs and Jews who were unfit for slave labor, (i.e. 70-90% of the total) were marked for extermination.

In the Nazi mind, all Jews represented the Bolshevik peril. "German National Socialism and Jewish Bolshevism could not coexist," German soldiers were told. "This is a war of extinction." There is simply no way Jews could escape the fate of Russians in general. By July 1942 the first extermination camps Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka were opened.

During the winter of 1940-41, there were food shortages and public grumbling in Germany. The Nazis realized the food was the key to public support. According to historians Deborah Dwork and Jan van Pelt, the Nazis calculated that "tens of millions of Russians would have to die in order to safeguard German meat rations. German food would not go east to the invading army; rather [2.5 million] German soldiers would be fed at the expense of the local population." ("/Holocaust: A History" /p 265.)

The Nazis "looked to the east to become the breadbasket of New Europe...a true granary [characterized by] low density of settlement...prosperous farms and attractive small towns." They envisaged "the deportation of 41 to 51 million people which included 80-85% of all Poles...It was tacitly understood that they would be killed." (266)

Goring remarked to Italian Foreign Minister Ciano in Dec. 1941: "This year between 20 and 30 million persons will die in Russia of hunger. Perhaps it is well that it should be so, for certain nations must be decimated." (190)

At the same time, the Allies subjected the German civilian population to a murderous bombing campaign. In July 1943 in a Hamburg fire storm, 50,000 people died in "Operation Gomorrah." 800,000 fled the city in the aftermath.

World War Two was a time of unparalleled savagery and ethnic cleansing. I will not attempt a complete inventory here. The Romanians used the cover of war to kill 250,000 Jews at their own initiative. The Croats murdered 350,000 Serbs. The German army lost 4 million men killed and 4 million wounded. The Soviet army lost over 9 million dead and 18 million wounded. Civilian losses were 1.8 million in Germany and 11.5 million in Russia. China lost 20 million civilians.

My point is that the real Holocaust was the war itself. The Jewish Holocaust was a part of it. The injustice is focusing on the Jewish experience, which is racism in the name of anti-racism. It implies that only Jewish lives matter. The challenge is to mourn the world war as a collective tragedy for humanity and to understand why it took place, before we have another.

The True Lesson of World War Two

The lesson of World War Two is that our politicians are pied pipers who can lead their gullible flock to annihilation. The media plays the entrancing tune. They all serve the cabal that owns the world's central banks and is working steadily to establish its world government dictatorship.

Jewish moneylenders based in Amsterdam funded the English Revolution (Cromwell 1640-1649) and later the ascendancy of William of Orange (1687). Thus they were able to establish the Bank of England in 1694, intermarry with the British aristocracy and begin their relentless drive to take over the world. They used British-American imperialism, Illuminism (Kabalism, Freemasonry), Socialism, Communism, Neo Conservatism, Feminism and Zionism as their vehicles. War is considered revolutionary because it advances their New World Order. That's why there is always war.(See my "Bankers Seek Totalitarian Control")

Hitler referred to this clique in 1939: "Once again I will be a prophet: should international Jewry of finance succeed, both within and beyond Europe, in plunging mankind into yet another world war, then the result will not be Bolshevism of the earth, and the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe." (260)

In 1942 he reiterated: "This war will not turn out the way the Jews imagine it, that is with the extermination of the European Aryan peoples, but that the result of this war will be the destruction of Jewry." (284)

The Nazis saw the war in terms of saving the German race and western civilization from the Bolshevik New World Order, which we now face. This is why Holocaust minmizers imagine the Nazis were heroes and want to absolve them of guilt.

However the pagan and genocidal Nazis were hardly fit standard-bearers for civilization. In addition, the London-based Kabalist (Masonic) banking clique that Hitler condemned actually financed his war machine. It wanted to destroy Germany and the concepts of race and nationalism, provide a rationale for the establishment of Israel, brutalize and demoralize mankind and turn a profit, all at once.

As you can see, whether we are German, American or Russian; Zionists, Masons or whatever, ordinary people cannot afford to blithely join causes without considering their hidden agendas or consequences.

Apparently World War Three will begin as a confrontation between Israel and Iran. It may spread to a nuclear trade-off between the US, Russia and China. Obviously we need to stop arguing about how many Jews died 60 years ago and focus on preventing World War Three and the NWO.

It turns out that the hope for a more humane law was exaggerated. Now, the Knesset is seeking to extend the temporary citizenship law by another two years, and it will also vote in a second and third reading on the law on illegal aliens, which will prevent the unification of families for those who resided in Israel illegally for as little as a month. In theory, this law is meant to counter illegal immigration; in practice it is another measure for blocking citizenship to those who are not Jews, even if they have family ties with an Israeli.

Arab citizens have to marry among themselves, or emigrate from Israel. Any possibility of marrying an Arab from a different state or the territories will be blocked by the citizenship law or the law on illegal aliens. However, the law on illegal aliens will also hurt families of Jewish new immigrants who want to bring with them non-Jewish family members. These include non-Jewish children from previous marriages, non-Jewish elderly parents of new immigrants and also foreign workers who fell in love with Israelis and would like to live with them in Israel. The strict immigration policy that Israel is adopting with these laws completely ignores the breadth of possibilities stemming from ties of love and human relationships. Henceforth, the government recommends, through legislation, it is advisable to fall in love only with Jews, or to give up living in Israel.

The citizenship law was originally created to open the door to non-Jews to also live in Israel. While the Law of Return is the law that instituted the Jewish state and provides for automatic naturalization for any Jew, the citizenship law is meant to solve different human problems. But since the demographic panic began, and the rumor was spread that the Palestinians are trying to manifest the right of return through marriage with Arab Israelis, and hundreds of thousands of non-Jewish new immigrants from Russia arrived, and the number of foreign worker rose, a coalition of those fearful for the future demography of Israel emerged, which led to superfluous legislative initiatives.

No doubt, Israel, too, like all Western states, must formulate a reasonable immigration policy. The difference between such a policy and the hunting down of parents, children and partners of Israelis, most of them living in Israel illegally because of the circumstances, is enormous. A country of immigrants like Israel cannot ignore the slew of human problems that emerge, and family members should not be asked to separate because some of them do not meet the entry requirements. Preventing the unification of families of Arab Israelis with their partners is discrimination of the worst kind. It has nothing to do with immigration, but with the right of every citizen to live in his/her country with his/her partner and children.

Irrelevant? Really? The FBI and the CIA did not think so. In 1996-1997, the two agencies climbed over the notorious "wall" to collaborate on an animation showing how a crippled 747 could climb rocket-like for 3,200 feet after its nose had been blown off. This animation was critical. The FBI needed such a scenario to silence the media and close the case.

The CIA video could not have been more definitive. "The Eyewitnesses Did Not See a Missile," reads an underlined script on the video screen. No, "What the witnesses saw was a Boeing 747 in various stages of crippled flight." The FBI showed the CIA video at its final press conference in November 1997, thereby ending any serious investigation.

Despite doubts, the NTSB stuck to the story. At the final NTSB hearing in August 2000, Dr. David Mayer, acting chief of the NTSB's Orwellian-titled "Human Performance Division," reaffirmed the zoom climb. "As the airplane maneuvered in crippled flight," said Mayer in an attempt to explain what the eyewitnesses saw, "it appeared to fly nearly straight up." Tellingly, at no NTSB hearing were the eyewitnesses, several of them pilots or military personnel, ever allowed to testify.

Goelz himself knows just how relevant the zoom climb is. His claim that "there is absolutely no evidence that a missile was fired at this aircraft" hinges on the zoom climb. Without it, there is no way to explain the testimony of the 270 FBI eyewitnesses who had seen lights streaking up toward the plane in the seconds before it exploded. Without it, that eyewitness testimony becomes once again all but irrefutable evidence of a missile strike.

Much of that testimony was vivid and specific. One travel industry professional, for instance, told the FBI that she was standing on the beach when she noticed a 747 "level off." With her eye still on TWA Flight 800, she watched in awe as a "red streak" with a "light gray smoke trail" moved up towards the airliner at a 45-degree angle. Then, the "red streak went past the right side and above the aircraft before arcking [sic] back down toward the aircrafts [sic] right wing."

She saw "the front of the aircraft separate from the back" and watched as the burning pieces of the debris fell from the aircraft. She provided a drawing that showed the scenario in some detail, including the "upside down Nike swoosh," which ended at the plane's right wing. By the way, she correctly identified the departure of the plane's nose long before that detail became publicly known. For the record, hers is one of perhaps 100 comparably strong testimonies.

A veteran safety investigator and a serious student of aerodynamics, Ray Lahr thought the zoom climb scenario a canard the moment he saw it. There is scarcely a pilot anywhere who disagrees with Lahr. Buttressed by wide support in the aviation community, he began his nine-year quest to see the evidence used to calculate the zoom climb.

Lahr is making progress. The Los Angeles judge clearly sided with him. He ruled that the case Lahr and Clarke presented was sufficiently strong "to permit plaintiff to proceed based on his claim that the government acted improperly in its investigation of Flight 800 or at least performed in a grossly negligent fashion."

Ten years out, the evidence for a missile strike grows stronger by the week. A Pulitzer awaits the first major media organization to tackle this case in a serious way. Shamefully, none ever has.