|
"You get America out of Iraq and
Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism."
- Cindy Sheehan |
P I C T U R E
O F T H E D A Y
|
Rescue
workers look through debris in Evansville, Ind., Sunday,
Nov. 6, 2005. A tornado ripped across southwestern
Indiana and northern Kentucky, killing at least 20 people,
wrecking homes and knocking out power to thousands. (AP
Photo/Darron Cummings) |
The national debate, which the
indictment of Irving Lewis Libby for perjury and obstruction
of justice has aroused in the mass media, has failed
to address the most basic questions concerning the
deep structural context, which influenced his felonious
behavior. The most superficial explanation was that
Libby, by exposing Valerie Plame (a CIA employee),
acted out of revenge to punish her husband Wilson for
exposing the lies put forth by Bush about Iraq's "importation" of
uranium from Niger. Other journalists claim that Libby
acted to cover up the fabrications to go to war. The
assertion however raises a deeper question -- who were
the fabricators of war propaganda, who was Libby protecting?
And not only the "fabricators of war", but
the strategic planners, speech-makers and architects
of war who acted hand in hand with the propagandists
and the journalists who disseminated the propaganda?
What is the link between all these high- level functionaries,
propagandists and journalists?
Equally important given the positions of power which
this cabal occupied, and the influence they exercised
in the mass media as well as in designing strategic
policy, what forces were engaged in bringing criminal
charges against a key operative of the cabal?[...]
The prosecution of Libby however reveals the intense
internal struggle over the control of the US imperial
state between the neocons and the traditional leaders
of its major institutions. Along with the indictment
of Libby by a grand jury at the request of the special
prosecutor, the FBI has arrested the two leading policy
makers of the most influential pro-Israeli lobby (AIPAC)
for spying for the State of Israel. These are not simply
isolated actions by individual officials or investigators.
To have proceeded against Libby and AIPAC leaders ,
they had to have powerful institutional backing; otherwise
the investigations would have been terminated even
before they began.
The CIA is deeply offended by the neocon usurpation
of their intelligence role, their direct channels to
the President, their loyalty to Israel. The military
is extremely angry at their exclusion from the councils
of government over questions of war, the disastrous
war policy which have depleted the armed forces of
recruits, devastated troop morale, and the neocons'
grotesque ignorance of the costs of a colonial occupation.
It is no wonder that General Tommy Frank referred to
Douglas Feith as "the stupidest bastard I have
ever met."
The current institutional war recalls an earlier conflict
between the rightwing Senator Joseph McCarthy and the
Defense Department. At the time during the mid 1950's,
Senator McCarty was accumulating power first by purging
trade unions, Hollywood, the universities, and promoting
likeminded conservative officials. He successfully
extended his investigations and purges to the State
Department and finally tried to do the same to the
military. It was here that Senator McCarthy met his
Waterloo, his attack backfired, the Army stood its
ground, refuted his accusations and discredited his
fabrications and grab for power.[...] |
My letter to the editor of Newsday:
Esteemed Editor:
Mary Voboril's article "Conspiracy Theories:
The Truth is Out There" regarding the events
of September 11, 2001 was of keen personal interest
to me, as one who was present in the World Trade Center
that morning, and also as an attendee at the "two-day
conference" mentioned in the article.
It seems to me that we really haven't
a choice in believing or disbelieving "9/11 conspiracy
theories" in general, but rather which conspiracy
theory to believe, including the "official" conspiracy
promulgated by the Bush Administration and the "9/11
Commission".
Indeed, there was a conspiracy, as "conspiracy" comes
from the Latin for "to breathe together" and
I've yet to meet anyone who proposes that all four
airplanes hijacked themselves that morning.
I'm sorry to say that the official version is presented
to us by a most dubious source, with a most serious
track record for disseminating disinformation about
non-existent "weapons of mass destruction" and
impossible links between the religious fanatic Osama
bin Laden and the staunch secularist Saddam Hussein.
Of course there are plenty of other theories, some
worthy of further examination, others quite dismissable.
I myself am not yet ready to subscribe to any one
to the exclusion of others.
However, I can tell you which one I reject out of
hand. |
Today, November 6th, Newsday published
a story admitting that questioning the "official" 9/11
story is becoming mainstream, but trying to write off
all such questioning as being another conspiracy theory.
Here's a letter I wrote to the editor. You can use
it if you wish to send your own letter.
The address is: Letters Editor, Newsday, 235 Pinelawn
Rd., Melville, NY 11747-4250 Fax: 631-843-2986 E-Mail:
letters@newsday.com
Please note that Newsday's editorial policy says "only
letters that include the writer's full name, postal
mailing address, and day and nighttime telephone numbers
will be read and considered for publication."
Dear Editor,
I am writing regarding Mary Voboril's November 6th
article entitled "Conspiracy Theories: The truth
is out there - maybe". While Ms. Voboril may have
consulted a couple of experts regarding conspiracy
theories in general, it does not appear that she has
investigated the first thing about 9/11 itself. Ms.
Voboril might be surprised to learn that the following
high- ranking current and former U.S. Government officials
have questioned the official 9/11 story, and many of
them have directly stated that elements of the government
were complicit in the attacks:
Current U.S. congresswoman, Cynthia McKinney;
Former chief economist for the Department of Labor
under George W. Bush, who was also director of the
Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for
Policy Analysis, Morgan Reynolds;
Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President
Reagan, listed by Who's Who in America as one of the
1,000 most influential political thinkers in the world,
Paul Craig Roberts;
Former director of the U.S. "Star Wars" space
defense program in both Republican and Democratic administrations,
who was a senior air force colonel who flew 101 combat
missions (who is also a Catholic Archbishop), Dr. Robert
M. Bowman;
Former senior CIA analyst, who prepared and presented
Presidential Daily Briefs and served as a high-level
analyst for several presidents, Ray McGovern;
Former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning
under Nixon, Ford, and Carter, Morton Goulder;
Former US Ambassador and Chief of Mission to Iraq,
and Former US Department of State Foreign Service Officer,
Edward L. Peck;
Former Ambassador Joseph Wilson; and
Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg, as
well as a who's who of liberals, conservatives and
independents.
See http://www.911proof.com/
I would urge Ms. Voboril to look at the facts for
herself.
In addition, while I applaud Ms. Voboril for noting
the kernel of truth in some conspiracy theories, I
would remind her of the following quote:
"If you tell a big enough Lie, and keep on repeating
it, in the end people will come to believe it".
Josef Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda chief.
Many Nazis went to their graves believing that Hitler
was a good guy and that the Nazis carried out no wars
of foreign aggression and possessed no concentration
camps. Why? Because they could not conceive that their
leaders could tell such a "big lie".
9/11 was, similarly, such a "big lie" that
even bright reporters like Ms. Voboril might not be
willing to even look at whether the official story
concerning 9/11 could be untrue. As a reporter, however,
I would urge Ms. Voboril to look into the facts for
herself, rather than discussing conspiracy theories
in the abstract.
Very Truly Yours, George Washington |
No tinfoil hat required
If one intends to accuse another person of being
delusional, they ought to be prepared to produce
supporting evidence.
For many years now, the mainstream media has played
a key role in maintaining the government's "official
account" of 911. In all respects, it has done
a brilliant job of filtering out everything that might
undermine the government's claims, while simultaneously
demonizing anyone who dares to challenge those claims.
So let's get to the point: Is it REALLY baseless idiocy
that drives people to question the official account
of 911? Are the millions of
Americans (which include Senators, FBI agents, Doctors,
Lawyers, Professors, Scientists, Engineers, etc.) all
paranoid loons for suggesting a TRULY independent investigation
of 911 is needed? The government and media would
have you think so. They'd also (to help maintain that
perception) need to keep you properly diverted away
from the information you're about to read.
The VERIFIABLE truth is, for
decades our government has been doing very nasty
things that most Americans would NEVER believe to
be true. The verifiable truth is, the media
has fed you a steady diet of MEANINGLESS news stories
instead of sharing information that is vitally important
to the future of this country. The verifiable truth
is, if it wasn't for the internet (which the media
is now demonizing and the government is trying to
get control of) most of us would have NEVER known
how badly we've been lied to by those we've trusted.
Let us start with the main assertion:
"It is crazy to think corrupt elements within
our government intentionally LET the attacks on 911
happen so they could be used as a pretext for war.
Furthermore, it is even crazier to suggest corrupt
elements might have actually facilitated the attacks."
Now to be fair, I will admit it is utterly insane
to intentionally provoke and allow an attack against
one's own country. I agree it is even more insane (and
criminal) to facilitate such an attack; sacrificing
innocent human beings so the "outrage" could
be used as a pretext for an already established military
agenda. ...Psychotic Tyrants in other countries might
resort to these kinds of "False Flag" operations,
but would OUR OWN government ever conspire to do the
same? The answer might surprise you.
A hypothetical scenario:
Imagine if the President of the United States came
on television and announced that Iraq had shot down
a civilian airliner filled with American students on
vacation. Imagine if there were no survivors, only
grieving parents who had lost their children at the
hands of a crazed and arrogant dictator. Imagine if
all that remained of the plane and its crew was the
frantic and desperate tape of its pilot's final transmission: "Mayday,
Mayday, we are being tailed by an Iraqi Fighter...we
need help up here and fast...mayday, do you copy..." and
then the sound of an explosion, screaming, then silence.
Now, imagine in the midst of the "outrage" and
calls for Saddam's head on a platter, some "idiot
conspiracy theorist" stood up and said:
"It is all a lie! Iraq is innocent of the charges
against it!!! Our government was behind the whole thing!
They loaded a civilian airliner with FAKE passengers,
flew the plane to a secret location, unloaded the fake
passengers and replaced the original plane with a remote-controlled
drone that was painted up to look like the original.
They then had a FAKE Iraqi Fighter Jet (it was really
an American Fighter painted to LOOK LIKE an Iraqi Fighter)
chase after the remote controlled drone. Then, they
transmitted a FAKE "Mayday" signal from the
drone just before blowing it up! It was all a set up
so we could frame and attack Iraq!"
In the above "hypothetical scenario" who
would you be more likely to believe? The President
(with the media backing him up) or the "Crazy
Conspiracy Theorist?"
Well, substitute "Iraq and Saddam" for "Cuba
and Castro" and you've got The Northwood's Document.
The Northwood's Document is an official United States
government plan to provoke and allow attacks to be
used as a pretext for invading Cuba. The plan goes
further to suggest, if provocation does not work, we
could "attack ourselves" and blame Cuba.
It even speaks of completely fabricating an attack
to be used as a pretext. President Kennedy rejected
the plan just prior to being assassinated. Had he not,
this plan WOULD HAVE led to war and the death of many
thousands based on total lies. Even worse, it might
have led to a nuclear exchange with Russia. ...MILLIONS
dead, based on lies. [...]
The Northwoods document (available
at the National Security Archive) proves beyond any
shadow of doubt that our government has openly conspired
to COMPLETELY MANUFACTURE a pretext for war. It also
gives us an idea of how far the ruling elite are willing
to go in order to deceive the American people; how
far they are willing to go in order to get what they
want.
Now, does this prove corrupt elements in our own government
were in some way responsible for the attacks of 911?
No, but it does irrefutably establish that it's Not
CRAZY to suggest it's possible. As a matter of fact,
it proves a person must be ignorant, delusional (or
simply lying) to suggest it isn't possible. It's just
that simple
Knowing full well that it isn't "crazy" to
suggest complicity or cover up, why is there such a
constant and concerted effort by the government and
the mainstream media to convince us otherwise? ...we'll
be covering that in part 2 (coming soon.) |
Finally, the government has admitted
it doctored intelligence that plunged us into a disastrous
war.
The Vietnam War, that is.
The New York Times reported this week
that a National Security Agency historian concluded
that communications intercepted by U.S. eavesdroppers
during the Gulf of Tonkin incident were altered to
make it appear that North Vietnamese had attacked American
warships in August 1964.
I know, a lot of you are shocked to hear this news.
You are flabbergasted to learn that this great nation
went to war at least partly as a result of falsified
intelligence. Who but the most rabid America-hater
could ever have imagined such a thing?
What's really crazy is that the NSA officers who greased
the skids for our Southeast Asian adventure apparently
had no political motive; they distorted intelligence
to cover up some of their initial blunders during their
Tonkin surveillance.
"Rather than come clean about their mistake,
they helped launch the United States into a bloody
war," said an independent historian familiar with
the NSA's research, which the agency had kept secret
since 2001.
It's hard to miss the irony of these findings coming
to light at a time when the Valerie Plame case has
been dominating the headlines. The CIA agent's outing
occurred, of course, after her husband, former ambassador
Joseph Wilson, revealed that the Bush administration
had relied on fake documents to bolster its claim that
Saddam Hussein was rebuilding Iraq's nuclear- weapons
program. [...] |
A
White House Without Rove?
He's not gone yet, but his Texas-size ambitions are giving
way to smaller goals
|
By MIKE ALLEN
Sunday, Nov. 06, 2005 |
He's weary. His wife and only child, who is approaching
college, miss him. He has monstrous legal bills. His
unique bond with the President is under stress. His most
important work is done.
Karl Rove's colleagues don't
know exactly when it will happen, but they are
already laying out the reasons they will give for
the departure of the man President George W. Bush
dubbed the architect. A Roveless Bush seemed
unthinkable just a few months ago. But that has
changed as the President's senior adviser and deputy
chief of staff remains embroiled in the CIA leak
scandal.
Despite Rove's flashes of ebullience in recent days
and the insistence of friends that he is out of legal
jeopardy, several of the most
important lawyers who deal with special counsel Patrick
Fitzgerald said they saw more clues last week that
Fitzgerald is continuing to look into the possibility
of charging Rove with lying to investigators
or the grand jury or both. If that happens, Rove almost
certainly would resign immediately, as did I. Lewis
Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff,
when Libby was indicted two weeks ago. Otherwise, Rove
is likely to wait for a chance to minimize the perception
that he is being hounded out or leaving under a cloud.
And he's got one constituency rooting for him, the
conservatives who rely on him to be their voice. If
he leaves, he will not be alone. Several well-wired
Administration officials predict that within a year,
the President will have a new chief of staff and press
secretary, probably a new Treasury Secretary and maybe
a new Defense Secretary.
The expected departures are
among a host of new signs suggesting that Bush's
sixth year in office--the last one before midterm
elections and a turn in attention toward the 2008
race to succeed him--will be very different from
his first five. The sunny optimist who loved
to think big is now facing polls in which for the
first time a majority of Americans say they do not
trust him. "It's like it's twilight in America," says
one frustrated conservative.
At the White House, aides are meeting every day to
work out a new agenda. A possible centerpiece is a
road show next year to promote a plan for simplifying
the million-plus words of the tax code, one of Bush's
most reliable applause winners on the stump in 2004.
[...] |
WASHINGTON - US
military intelligence warned the Bush administration
as early as February 2002 that its key source on
Al-Qaeda's relationship with Iraq had provided "intentionally
misleading" data, according to a declassified
report.
Nevertheless, eight months later, President George
W. Bush went public with charges that the Iraqi government
of Saddam Hussein had trained members of Osama bin
Laden's terror network in manufacturing deadly poisons
and gases.
These same accusations had
found their way into then-secretary of state Colin
Powell's February 2003 speech before the UN Security
Council, in which he outlined the US rationale
for military action against Iraq. [...]
On 31 May 2003, the [Guardian] ran an article
headlined "Straw, Powell Had Serious Doubts
Over Their Iraqi Weapons Claims." Citing
transcripts of unknown origin provided by an anonymous "diplomatic
source," the article said that Britain's Home
Secretary and the US's Secretary of State had a "secret
meeting" in which they "expressed serious
doubts about the quality of intelligence on Iraq's
banned weapons programme." Certainly
sounds plausible, given all the other revelations
about bad intelligence, nonexistent reports, plagiarized
reports, faked reports, and pressure on intelligence
agencies to cook their findings. It's of a piece
with US News and World Report 's revelation that, several
days before the alleged meeting mentioned above,
Powell was rehearsing his WMD speech for the UN.
He threw the papers into the air, saying, "I'm
not reading this. This is bullshit."
In captivity, al-Libi initially told his DIA debriefers
that Al-Qaeda operatives had received training from
Iraq in manufacturing poisons and deadly chemical agents.
But the DIA, according to its assessment, did not
find the information credible. [...]
"It is possible," the document
went on to say, "he does not know any further
details; it is more likely this individual is intentionally
misleading the debriefers."
The DIA suggested al-Libi, who had been under interrogation
for several weeks, "may be describing scenarios
to the debriefers that he knows will retain their interest." [...]
Jay Rockefeller, the
top Democrat of the Senate intelligence committee,
said the case of al-Libi illustrates the need to look
into how pre-war intelligence was used.
"He's an entirely unreliable
individual upon whom the White House was placing substantial
intelligence trust," the senator said of al-Libi
Sunday. "And that is a classic example of a lack
of accountability to the American people."
Al-Libi formally recanted last year,
according to congressional officials. |
Yesterday we wrote about the Washington
Post's decision not to disclose the "Eastern
European democracies" in which the CIA set up
its clandestine "black sites" -- interrogation
centers where U.S. laws do not apply to the treatment
of suspected terrorists. We wondered if the fact that
the CIA was operating inside "democracies" with
their own laws didn't defeat the purpose.
The Post wrote that its decision to hide the names
had to do with security concerns -- worries that
terrorists might then target those countries. We
thought this was reasonable, but also wondered to
ourselves how long it would be before some other
enterprising news outlet would figure out which countries
were in question and print their names.
Well, it didn't take long. The Financial Times reported
today that research from Human Rights Watch indicates
that Poland and Romania are the countries playing host
to the interrogation camps. And as the Times noted, "Poland's
role, if confirmed, would be especially controversial,
given that it has recently joined the European Union."
Putting aside what we said yesterday
about the implications of this news (i.e. "The
president may have broken the law by allowing the CIA
to interrogate and detain suspects in countries where
its methods are clearly illegal"), perhaps we
were too easy on the Post for acceding to the government's
request that it not disclose the countries involved.
One Washington foreign policy analyst, Peter Kornbluh,
told us, "This is probably the most important
newspaper capitulation since [the New York Times] yielded
to JFK's call for them not to run the full story of
planning for the Bay of Pigs. By
withholding the country names, the Post is directly
enabling the rendition, secret detention, and torture
of prisoners at these locations to continue. That is
a ghastly responsibility."
To Kornbluh, it's moot that the Financial Times came
along and filled in the holes the Post left in its
account. We're not so sure. The editors of the Post
have been around the block a few times; they must have
known it was inevitable that this information would
come out. From outside looking in, it appears their
motive was not to keep the information secret, but
rather to avoid being the first to expose the location
of the "black sites."
What we do know is that the Post is trying to have
it both ways: Getting credit for breaking the story,
without breaking the specific details that might have
caused it grief from the CIA.
Which raises an old question: Is it the job of a newspaper
to tell us what it knows -- or to bend over backwards
to hide information from us?
We think we know our answer. |
Did you know....
1. 80% of all votes in America are counted by only
two companies: Diebold and ES&S.
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/042804landes.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diebold
2. There is no federal agency with regulatory authority
or oversight of the U.S. voting machine industry.
http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0916-04.htm
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/042804landes.html
3. The vice-president of Diebold and the president
of ES&S are brothers.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/private_company.html
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/042804landes.html
4. The chairman and CEO of Diebold is a major Bush
campaign organizer and donor who wrote in 2003 that
he was "committed to helping Ohio deliver its
electoral votes to the president next year."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/28/sunday/main632436.shtml
http://www.wishtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=1647886
5. Republican Senator Chuck Hagel used to be chairman
of ES&S. He became Senator based on votes counted
by ES&S machines.
http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/columns/2004/03/03_200.html
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/031004Fitrakis/031004fitrakis.html
6. Republican Senator Chuck Hagel, long-connected
with the Bush family, was recently caught lying about
his ownership of ES&S by the Senate Ethics Committee.
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=26
http://www.hillnews.com/news/012903/hagel.aspx
http://www.onlisareinsradar.com/archives/000896.php
7. Senator Chuck Hagel was on a short list of George
W. Bush's vice- presidential candidates.
http://www.businessweek.com/2000/00_28/b3689130.htm
http://theindependent.com/stories/052700/new_hagel27.html
8. ES&S is the largest voting machine manufacturer
in the U.S. and counts almost 60% of all U.S. votes.
http://www.essvote.com/HTML/about/about.html
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/042804landes.html
9. Diebold's new touch screen voting machines have
no paper trail of any votes. In other words, there
is no way to verify that the data coming out of the
machine is the same as what was legitimately put in
by voters.
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0225-05.htm
http://www.itworld.com/Tech/2987/041020evotestates/pfindex.html
10. Diebold also makes ATMs, checkout scanners, and
ticket machines, all of which log each transaction
and can generate a paper trail.
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0225-05.htm
http://www.diebold.com/solutions/default.htm
11. Diebold is based in Ohio.
http://www.diebold.com/aboutus/ataglance/default.htm
12. Diebold employed 5 convicted felons as consultants
and developers to help write the central compiler computer
code that counted 50% of the votes in 30 states.
http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,61640,00.html
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/10/301469.shtml
13. Jeff Dean was Senior Vice-President of Global
Election Systems when it was bought by Diebold. Even
though he had been convicted of 23 counts of felony
theft in the first degree, Jeff Dean was retained as
a consultant by Diebold and was largely responsible
for programming the optical scanning software now used
in most of the United States.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0312/S00191.htm
http://www.chuckherrin.com/HackthevoteFAQ.htm#how
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-8.pdf
14. Diebold consultant Jeff Dean was convicted of
planting back doors in his software and using a "high
degree of sophistication" to evade detection over
a period of 2 years.
http://www.chuckherrin.com/HackthevoteFAQ.htm#how
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-8.pdf
15. None of the international election observers
were allowed in the polls in Ohio.
http://www.globalexchange.org/update/press/2638.html
http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2004/10/26/loc_elexoh.html
16. California banned the use of Diebold machines
because the security was so bad. Despite Diebold's
claims that the audit logs could not be hacked, a chimpanzee
was able to do it! (See the movie here: http://blackbox
voting.org/baxter/baxterVPR.mov.)
http://wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,63298,00.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4874190
17. 30% of all U.S. votes are carried out on unverifiable
touch screen voting machines with no paper trail.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/28/sunday/main632436.shtml
18. All -- not some -- but all the voting machine
errors detected and reported in Florida went in favor
of Bush or Republican candidates.
http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,65757,00.html
http://tinyurl.com/7x34w
http://www.rise4news.net/extravotes.html
http://tinyurl.com/4bk4j
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0411/S00227.htm
19. The governor of the state of Florida, Jeb Bush,
is the President's brother.
http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/tallahassee/news/local/7628725.htm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10544-2004Oct29.html
20. Serious voting anomalies in Florida -- again
always favoring Bush -- have been mathematically demonstrated
and experts are recommending further investigation.
http://tinyurl.com/85wp3
http://tinyurl.com/7odaj
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/tens_of_thousands.html
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1106-30.htm
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2004/110904.html
http://uscountvotes.org/ |
Trinidadian authorities have detained
an Israeli national found living in a remote mountainous
area east of the capital, police said, declining to
state if he was being questioned in connection with
a recent spate of bombings in the Caribbean island
nation.
A string of bombings, the latest one occuring last
Thursday, have rocked the capital of Port-of-Spain.
The bombings have injured 28 people.
Authorities identified the detained man as Dahtang
Mik Agarunov, 26. They said he was found living in
a wooden shack in Arouca, about 10 miles east of Port-of-Spain.
Agarunov was detained on Friday and questioned by Interpol,
Trinidadian police and immigration officials.
Authorities would not say if Agarunov was being questioned
in connection with a spate of four bombings last month.
No one has claimed responsibility for the bombings
or linked them to any political movement.
"Once we have completed our investigation, we
will be in a better place to provide more detail," said
Police Commissioner Trevor Paul.
Agarunov has not been charged with
any crime. He arrived in Trinidad on October 18, but
authorities have not confirmed why he was visiting
the island.
The Israeli Embassy spokesman in Venezuela, Giora
Loterstein, said he was unaware of Agarunov's detention. |
PORT OF SPAIN, Trinidad (AP) -
An Islamic leader who was briefly held for questioning
in a bombing outside a nightclub denied involvement
in the attack on Monday, but said he has a description
of at least one assailant. Yasin Abu Bakr, leader of
the Jamaat al-Muslimeen group, speaks during a news
conference in Port of Spain, Trinidad on Monday. Abu
Bakr, who was briefly held for questioning about a
bombing outside a nightclub last Friday night, denied
involvement in the attack and said his group is 'vigorously
pursuing' those behind the bombings and that it has
a description of at least one person involved. He accused
police of detaining him because of pressure from the
government, business groups and some citizens. (Photo:
AP)
Yasin Abu Bakr, leader of the Jamaat al-Muslimeen
group, was released Sunday along with four teenage
followers after spending 36 hours in police custody
for questioning in Friday's explosion in Trinidad's
capital.
The blast, the fourth to rattle Port of Spain in as
many months, injured 14 people, including three who
were in serious condition. Speaking to reporters at
his group's headquarters, Abu Bakr accused police of
detaining him because of pressure from the government,
business groups and some citizens.
Asked if he or any member of his group participated
in the bombings, the 63 year-old Abu Bakr replied "Emphatically,
no." "It was an orchestrated action by people
who have hatched this conspiracy. The Jamaat is being
used as a scapegoat," Abu Bakr said. |
LOS ANGELES Nov 5, 2005 - A Jewish
Defense League activist imprisoned for his role in
a plot to bomb a California mosque and the office of
a Lebanese- American congressman was killed at a federal
prison in Phoenix, an FBI spokesman said Saturday.
[...]
Krugel's wife, Lola, of Los Angeles said FBI investigators
told her an inmate had struck her husband on the
head from behind with a cement block. [...]
He had been at the medium-security prison for three
days, according to his sister Linda Krugel of Los Angeles.
[...] |
SENIOR army doctors have warned
that troops in Iraq are suffering levels of battle
stress not experienced since the second world war because
of fears that if they shoot an insurgent, they will
end up in court.
The two senior Royal Army Medical Corps officers,
one of whom is a psychologist, have recently returned
from Basra, where they said they counselled young
soldiers who feared a military police investigation
as much as they did the insurgents. [...] |
WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick
Cheney's office triggered abuse of Iraqi prisoners
with word that filtered down to soldiers in the field
that interrogations were not providing needed intelligence,
a former senior State Department official has alleged.
Lawrence Wilkerson, who was Secretary
of State Colin Powell's chief of staff during President
Bush's first term, said Thursday, "It was
clear to me there that there was a visible audit
trail from the vice president's office through
the secretary of defense down to the commanders
in the field." [...]
A Cheney spokeswoman, Jennifer Mayfield, said: "The
vice president's office has no response." |
WASHINGTON - Lawmakers expressed
concern Sunday that the FBI was aggressively pushing
the powers of the anti-terrorist USA Patriot Act to
access private phone and financial records of ordinary
people.
"We should be looking at that very closely," said
Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., who is a member of the
Senate Judiciary Committee. "It appears to me
that this is, if not abused, being close to abused." [...]
Under the Patriot Act, the FBI issues
more than 30,000 national security letters allowing
the investigations each year, a
hundred-fold increase over historic norms, The
Washington Post reported Sunday, quoting unnamed government
sources.
The security letters, which were first used in the
1970s, allow access to people's phone and e-mail records,
as well as financial data and the Internet sites they
surf. The 2001 Patriot Act removed
the requirement that the records sought be those of
someone under suspicion. [...]
As the Dec. 31 deadline has
approached for Congress to renew provisions of the
act, the House and Senate have voted to make noncompliance
with a national security letter a criminal offense. [...] |
AULNAY-SOUS-BOIS, France - With
every night that France's rundown suburbs burn, officials
grow increasingly convinced that drug
traffickers and Islamist militants are using
frustrated youths to challenge law and order here.
Many people who watch their cars,
shops and schools go up in flames, however, are not
buying it. They blame unemployment, racial prejudice
and widespread youth boredom for the outbursts. [...]
"The politicians blame it on Islamists because
the French are afraid of this religion. They think
Islam equals bin Laden." |
As is the case with
other European countries where fascist and Islamist
fundamentalist forces have joined forces, there is
increasing evidence that the riots that have swept
France for a week and a half have been far more than
spontaneous reactions to the electrocution at a Paris
electrical sub-station of two Muslim teens who were
escaping police. With an ailing President Jacques Chirac
stepping down in 2007, the battle lines have been drawn
between two conservative presidential candidates -- Interior
Minister Nicolas Sarzoky (nicknamed "Sarko"),
a confirmed neo-con in the tradition of fellow travelers
in Italy, Britain, Denmark, the Netherlands, Israel,
and Spain, and Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin.
Sarkozy has inflamed Muslims and other minorities in
France by describing ghetto youths in broad pejorative
terms such as "riff-raff" and "scum." While
Sarkozy has inflamed the situation with his anti-immigrant
rhetoric, de Villepin has sought to mollify the situation
by not wanting to overreact and create more turmoil.
However, with rioting spreading beyond
Paris to the north and south of the country and extending
beyond young Muslims to unemployed African, Afro-Caribbean,
and white young people, the situation is being used
by Sarkozy to blame "Jihadist conspiracists" for
coordinating the rioting. Sarkozy
has strong links to the Likud Party in Israel and
the neo-cons in the Bush administration and the Blair
government in London. The neo-con media conglomerates
such as Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation and the
Hollinger Group are blaming the violence on France's
relative tolerance of its large Muslim population. The neo-con
media is also playing up reports that French rioters
are proclaiming that they are turning Paris into "Baghdad." [...]
Neo-con game plan? Turning Paris into Baghdad
What is happening
in France has all the signs of yet another possible
neo-con "false flag" operation in the same
category as the Niger fraudulent uranium documents...
The French politician
who benefits the most from this explosion of violence
in a country where Muslim citizens constitute a significant
minority is Sarkozy. The losers stand to be
de Villepin's faction of the Gaullist RPR party and
a newly-resurgent Socialist Party, which rejects
the neo-con international agenda. It
is not coincidental that the rioting is mainly plaguing
cities and towns governed by Socialist and Communist
mayors -- leaders who are now caught between addressing
the social problems that helped spark the violence
and responding to calls for a return to law and order.
The Socialists, Greens, and Communists
are charging Sarkozy with inciting greater violence
and then failing to respond to it adequately, thus
ensuring the rioting would spread beyond mainly Muslim
areas in Paris to wealthier Parisian neighborhoods
and beyond Paris to Rouen, Lille, Nice, Dijon, Strasbourg,
Marseille, Bordeaux, Rennes, Pau, Orleans, and Toulouse. [...]
It is all very transparent who is behind instigating
the violence now sweeping France.
Reasonable political
leaders in France should realize that the riots in
France are being used to ratchet up tensions in Europe
and distract attention away from recent reports of
US secret prison camps and torture centers in Eastern
Europe and additional proof that the neo-cons conspired
to push the United States into a disastrous war in
Iraq. Already, the neo-con media is blaming
the violence in France on Islamic terrorists -- a
stock phrase for the neo-cons in Washington, London,
Jerusalem, Rome, and the French Interior Ministry
allies of Sarkozy. However,
most of the rioters, mostly from North Africa and
Western Africa, are not even practicing Muslims,
making the possibility of "Fifth Column" provocateurs
being behind the violence all the more likely. French
officials are increasingly suggesting that the violence
has been closely coordinated and that the primary
targets -- trains, police stations, youth centers,
banks, libraries, post offices, municipal buildings,
schools -- have all been connected to the French
government and not to ethnic or religious groups.
[...]
A few years ago,
a senior inspector with the French DST (FBI) told
this editor that his agency's wiretaps of Richard
Perle's home in the south of France had yielded some
interesting information, all of which was passed
to the FBI in Washington. Perhaps it is time that
raw intercepts of international phone calls and e-mail
among the neo-cons be leaked in order to hang them
using their own past tactics. With their fingerprints
beginning to appear on the French rioting, the neo-cons
are proving that they will not be put down easily. |
The dollar closed at 0.8464 euros
on Friday, up 2.1% from the previous week's close of
0.8287. The euro, then, closed at 1.1815, compared
to 1.2066 the week before. Gold also fell against the
dollar, closing at 458.00 dollars an ounce, down 3.8%
from 475.20. Gold in euros would be 387.64, down 1.6%
from 393.83 at the previous Friday's close. Oil closed
at 60.58 dollars a barrel, down 1.1% from $61.22 the
week before. The gold/oil ratio saw a drop in the relative
position of gold, closing at 7.56, compared to 7.76
the Friday before. The yield on the ten-year U.S. Treasury
note closed at 4.66%, up nine basis points (hundredths
of a percent) from 4.57% at the previous Friday's close.
In the U.S. stock market, the Dow Jones Industrial
Average closed at 10,530.76 on Friday, up 1.2% from
10,402.77 the week before. The NASDAQ closed at 2,169.43
on Friday up 3.8% from 2,089.88 at the end of the previous
week.
The dollar strengthened last week based on higher
interest rates in the United States. The euro weakened
on the riot crisis in France. Combine the two and
you have a 2% rise in the dollar against the euro.
Job growth was very weak in October in the United
States, but most of the Mainstream Media is attributing
this to the hurricanes.
Job
growth weaker than expected
By Glenn Somerville
Fri Nov 4,12:49 PM ET
Only 56,000 U.S. jobs were created in October, about
half the number expected as the impact of Hurricane
Katrina faded, but wages grew at the strongest pace
in 2-1/2 years, a government report on Friday showed.
Though the Labor Department also
revised down total job growth for the two prior months,
it said the October national unemployment rate eased
to 5 percent from 5.1 percent, implying the job market
remained solid.
"The underlying trend looks
to still be in the 200,000 (jobs per month) range," said
economist Joel Naroff of Naroff Economic Advisors
in Holland, Pa. "And if that is correct, conditions
are okay, really."
Talk about spin. The quote from the Labor Department
neglects to mention that the slight drop in the unemployment
rate was due to so many people giving up looking for
jobs. They should call it the Job Seeking Rate.
As for Naroff's statement, the "underlying trend" refers
to a mythical number of what the job growth would have
been had there been no hurricanes. So
you can pick any counterfactual statement and label
that "underlying." How about this one: what
would all the economic numbers say if Bush hadn't gotten
away with stealing the last two elections?
Financial markets were whipsawed by the jobs data.
Bond and stock market participants focused initially
on low job totals and hoped it meant the Federal
Reserve might be more likely to halt its campaign
of interest-rate rises, but later grew worried that
rising wages could fire inflation.
By late morning, U.S. Treasury prices reversed course
and were showing losses for fear the Fed might instead
extend its rate rises, while stock prices turned
down on similar concern. But bond prices later recovered
modestly.
STORMS MUDDLE PICTURE
Wall Street economists had forecast that 100,000
jobs were created last month. But the figures remain
hard to interpret because of the impact of hurricanes
Katrina that struck the Gulf Coast in late August,
Rita that followed in September and Wilma that hit
Florida in October after the monthly jobs survey
was completed.
As many as 400,000 people are estimated to have
suffered job losses or interruptions in the Gulf
Coast, though many are returning to work at rebuilding
in the wake of the storms.
"The underlying economic fundamentals remain
sound as has been pointed out by the Fed," said
Alan Gayle, a managing director of Trusco Capital
Management in Atlanta, though fourth-quarter growth
may suffer if consumers spend less.
"You can't have this kind
of slowing in job growth coupled with rising energy
prices and not see some adverse impact on consumer
spending," Gayle said.
The Labor Department revised August
and September data to show that 36,000 fewer jobs
were created in the two months than previously thought.
It said there were 148,000 new jobs in August instead
of 211,000 and that 8,000 jobs were lost in September
instead of 35,000.
The Labor Department's commissioner
of labor statistics, Kathleen Utgoff, said last month's
softer pace of job creation could not be blamed on
the hurricanes. "Rather, job growth in the remainder
of the country appeared to be below trend in October," she
said.
The softness in the housing market in the United States
shows the contribution of both microeconomic factors
(excessive household debt, lower wages and inflation)
and psychological factors (fear of future, pessimism).
The psychological factors are easily manipulated, so
it is of some comfort that they are still attempting
to put positive spin on the economic news. When
they stop spinning the bad news, that will be when
they pull the plug on the economy. The rise in
U.S. stocks must be a signal that there is still a
little money left to steal before they pull the plug.
On the other hand, polls are clearly showing that the
U.S. public no longer believes the positive spin. According
to the New
York Times:
The spike in inflation, caused
largely by oil prices, seems to have soured many
Americans on the economy, despite its continued
growth. In a recent poll by the University of Michigan,
60 percent of people said that they expected the
next five years to bring periods of widespread
unemployment.
Not since 1992 have so many people given that answer. In
the middle of last year, fewer than 40 percent
of respondents did.
Since a consumer economy with vastly inflated paper
assets is propped up by psychology, the fact that the
pendulum has swung over to pessimism and fear is ominous
and will likely prove self-fulfilling.
...The widening of income inequality
in recent years appeared to continue last month.
Workers at financial, information and professional-services
companies - who tend to be highly paid - all got
big raises. Raises at factories, warehouses, tourism
companies, schools and health care providers were
smaller.
In his testimony this week, Mr.
Greenspan said the country was going through "a
very marked change in the distribution of income."
Speaking of lower wages, take a look at what Northwest
Airlines pilots had to settle for in their latest giveaway:
a 24% cut in wages.
Northwest
union in tentative labor deal
Fri Nov 4,11:29 AM ET
The union representing pilots at Northwest Airlines
said it reached a tentative deal with the airline
on a 24 percent pay cut that would stall the carrier's
effort to have a bankruptcy court void the pilots'
contract.
The Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) said late
on Thursday that the deal, which requires the approval
of its members and the bankruptcy court, would reduce
pilot costs for the airline by $17.9 million a month.
The concessions in the temporary deal would amount
to $214.8 million a year in labor savings for the
airline. That amount is 60 percent of the $358 million
Northwest is seeking from nearly 5,200 pilots.
Northwest, which is restructuring in bankruptcy,
has said it needs a total of $1.4 billion in annual
labor savings to survive. The carrier has asked for
court permission to cancel the labor contract of
any employee group that has not agreed to the concessions
it says are required.
The airline said on Wednesday, however, that it
would delay a November 16 hearing on the request
to cancel contracts until mid-January if the unions
representing its pilots, flight attendants and ground
workers would agree to temporary concessions equal
to 60 percent of the $1.4 billion.
...In addition to cutting wages by 24 percent, ALPA
said the temporary deal would cut some international
flying rates, reduce sick pay to 75 percent of regular
hourly pay and eliminate domestic crew meals.
...IAM said it expects Northwest to ask for a 19
percent reduction in pay and sick pay of 70 percent
of regular wages.
Northwest, which filed for bankruptcy in September,
has said it must reduce its labor costs to achieve
$2.5 billion in overall yearly savings.
Other carriers in bankruptcy, such as UAL Corp.'s
United Airlines, have used bankruptcy to extract
savings from their workers that might have been impossible
out of court.
Northwest, along with other major U.S. airlines,
has been battered by soaring fuel costs, weak revenue
and low-fare competition.
As the pay cuts and layoffs spread throughout the
middle class into the highly skilled technical jobs
such as airline pilots, where will the consumer debt-driven
U.S. economy go? My guess is that soon the whole
country will look like Detroit:
Turnaround
dreams take root in Detroit
By Stefanie Murray, USA TODAY
When Hurricane Katrina destroyed much of New Orleans
two months ago, another impoverished, mostly black
city stepped in to help.
Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick pledged that his
city would host 500 families displaced from the Gulf
Coast.
The offer came as Detroit found itself facing another
crisis, the latest in a half-century of problems
that mirror those of New Orleans: poverty, crime,
poor schools, white flight.
Most pressing now is the city's
dire financial situation. The Motor City faces an
accumulated $300 million budget deficit and could
go broke in 2006, its auditor general warned recently.
Since July 1, 500 city workers have been let go,
including police and firefighters. More layoffs are
possible.
The bad news comes just three months before Detroit
will be on the world stage when it hosts Super Bowl
XL on Feb. 5.
Detroit once was the heart of the
USA's industrial might and a symbol of its blue-collar
middle class, but the city has been in steep decline
for decades. Detroit's population has shrunk 50%
from 1.8 million in 1950 to just over 900,000 in
2004, bumping it off the list of the nation's 10
most populous cities.
"We're just as flooded as New Orleans, except
we are not waving white flags from the roof," says
Robin Boyle, professor of urban planning at Detroit's
Wayne State University.
A near demographic twin of New
Orleans, Detroit also bears the grim distinction
of having the highest poverty rate of any major U.S.
city: 33.6%, according to the Census Bureau. The
city's unemployment rate was 12.7% in September,
more than double the national rate of 5.1%.
A steady loss of automotive and other manufacturing
jobs has hurt: Michigan's Department of Labor and
Economic Growth estimates that since 1980, the six-county
Detroit metropolitan area has lost about 83,000 jobs
in what it calls the "transportation equipment
manufacturing and primary metal industry sectors" -
mainly autos and steel.
Many people in the city's well-heeled suburbs still
view Detroit as a magnet for crime and drugs, and
they come to town only to work, attend sporting events
or be entertained at the city's three casinos.
"Detroit has always felt like a delinquent
relative: They may embarrass you or make terrible
decisions, but you're still family," says Ryan
Keberly, a photographer in the suburb of Royal Oak
whose blog highlights Detroit's homeless.
Hoping for a rebound
About 74,000 people work downtown, but only 5,300
people live there, a Wayne State study this summer
said.
About 25% of the buildings in 140-square mile Detroit
are abandoned, which is probably one of the highest
such rates in the country, Boyle says. The blight
is easy to see. As in many other big cities, tall
buildings stud Detroit's skyline. From a distance,
they seem like beacons of commerce - but some of
Detroit's are vacant.
There are signs, however, of revitalization. The
city last year announced an effort to raze or rehab
141 vacant buildings before the Super Bowl; redevelopment
has begun at 86.
"It's not just a brick-and-mortar change," says
George Jackson, head of the Detroit Economic Growth
Corp., a quasi-public agency that guides development
and investment in the city. "There is a spirit
here now, and you can feel it."
The city is on the "cusp of the biggest turnaround
in American history," says Kilpatrick, who faces
a tough election Tuesday in a bid for a second four-year
term.
...Some Detroit residents say the city is making
progress.
"I'm not going to lie and say Detroit isn't
a tough city," says Keta Hackney, 24, who works
downtown at McKig Cleaners. "But it's coming
around. Slowly but surely, it's coming around."
Civic leaders are mostly optimistic, if not defiant,
about Detroit's future.
They point to more than 60 new businesses - at least
23 of them restaurants - and more than 800 lofts
and condominiums that have opened downtown since
2003. In 2004, 924 new housing permits were issued,
up from about 200 in 2001, says Walter Watkins, the
city's chief development officer.
New streetscapes were built and cement silos are
being razed along the historically industrial waterfront
on the Detroit River to pave the way for a 5-mile
walkway, a new state park, housing and retail space.
Cranes and scaffolding dot downtown.
Such redevelopment is harder to spot in many residential
neighborhoods, where hundreds of houses remain abandoned
and crime rates are high.
A Super Bowl 'blip'
The approaching Super Bowl has spurred some investment.
But revitalization and the Super Bowl "are kind
of coincidental," Watkins says. Boyle calls
it a "blip," one that has served as a rallying
point for the city.
Detroit's three casinos, which have been open for
about six years, also spark considerable traffic
and city revenue, as do its three major sports venues:
Comerica Park, home of Major League Baseball's Detroit
Tigers; Ford Field, home of the National Football
League's Lions and site of the Super Bowl; and Joe
Louis Arena, home of the National Hockey League's
Red Wings.
Major companies, including General Motors and Compuware,
have invested heavily in downtown.
GM invested $500 million to buy and upgrade the
713-foot-tall Renaissance Center, the city's tallest
structure, where it employs 6,000. Compuware spent
$400 million on a headquarters for its 4,000 workers.
Adam Brook, owner of a luggage and leather goods
shop downtown, agrees that things are changing. Nevertheless,
despite the ongoing construction near his third-generation
business, Cadillac Luggage, Brook says he can "count
the number of people that walk by my window every
day." He says he has barely broken even the
past three years.
"What's wrong with Detroit is we have thousands
of people who spend thousands of dollars here, at
the casinos, but it doesn't affect me one bit," Brook
says. "But hey, I love Detroit. It's the people,
and what the possibilities are. It's killing me,
but I love it."
As usual, this article from USA Today stresses the
positive, upbeat message of hope. And why not? If
the rest of the country's economy keeps growing, then
eventually Detroit will rebound. But what if
what's in store for the rest of the country is Detroit's
fate? What will it look like? The Web site dETROITfUNK,
featuring some beautiful photographs of Detroit - beautiful
both because they are well-composed and because truth
is beauty, and beautiful in the way all artistic depictions
of ancient ruins are - can give us a sense of what's
in store. In this case, you see the ruins of twentieth
century industry and stately nineteenth century buildings. Not
all of this photographer's work shows ruins, but enough
of Detroit is in ruins that an honest look will include
them. Here are a few examples:
Sometimes art can help us understand the numbers better. Bob
Dylan saw this coming forty years ago. Here are a couple
of verses from Desolation Row (Copyright © 1965;
renewed 1993 Special Rider Music):
Desolation Row
Bob Dylan
They're selling postcards of the hanging
They're painting the passports brown
The beauty parlor is filled with sailors
The circus is in town
Here comes the blind commissioner
They've got him in a trance
One hand is tied to the tight-rope walker
The other is in his pants
And the riot squad they're restless
They need somewhere to go
As Lady and I look out tonight
From Desolation Row
...Now at midnight all the agents
And the superhuman crew
Come out and round up everyone
That knows more than they do
Then they bring them to the factory
Where the heart-attack machine
Is strapped across their shoulders
And then the kerosene
Is brought down from the castles
By insurance men who go
Check to see that nobody is escaping
To Desolation Row
The anxiety is palpable, and not just in the United
States. The way in which the riots have spread
in France could not have been foreseen, but are depressingly
similar to the spread of the race riots in the United
States in the 1960s. Those riots did not only
take place in Detroit, Newark and Watts, but smaller
versions of them took place in hundreds of smaller
cities. The political elite were shocked and surprised;
had not the country finally passed the Civil Rights
Act and the Voting Rights Act? Why riot now?
As can be seen by the photographs of Detroit, the consequences
of those events are still playing out. One can
only hope France reacts better than the United States
did.
What is becoming evident to the public throughout
the world is that their voice is not being heeded. Thousands
took to the streets in Argentina to protest Bush and
Anglo-American neo-liberalism, but those pushing these
polices do not care about public opinion anymore. The
Iraq War proved that. Strong majorities even
in the United States oppose Bush and the neoliberal
agenda, but that no longer matters and people can sense
it.
The anxiety is playing out in the markets as well.
Here's Al
Martin:
And, in the market -- what you have seen mid-week
is an unusual type of trade wherein the bonds (U.S.
Treasuries) remain under severe pressure. Equities
opened higher, but then were pressured lower at
the same time the U.S. dollar remains slightly
higher. Yet precious metals and fungible commodities,
which had opened higher, came down and fell sharply
in late Wednesday trades. That was led by industrial
metals, by the way, and fungibles.
This is unusual economic confluence of circumstance.
Interrelationships between all of these markets have
all been stretched out the wrong way. The type of
trade that we saw last week in the equities, the
bonds, the metals and the dollars is called a depressionary
trade.
A depressionary trade is when the bonds start to
fall under nervousness over the U.S.'s continued
ability to even service its debt. The dollar is still
pushed higher under the belief that U.S. interest
rates would have to be moved sharply higher in order
to prevent the dollar from further rising using monetized
debt.
Commodity markets, in turn, particularly industrials
and fungibles, fall, in recognition that GDP is falling
sharply and that the demand for industrial and fungible
commodities is going to fall sharply.
We have mentioned this in the past, that industrial
production and capacity utilization in the last 30
days in this country, for lack of a better word,
has collapsed.
There should be no doubt of what these signs mean.
We talk about them all the time, but people don't
understand. Now we're seeing the results of this
in the markets.
...European Central Bank (ECB) chief Roger Trichet
made some remarks on Tuesday to the effect asking
-- Will the Bush-Cheney Regime even continue to survive
-- since all of the economic policies it is now pushing,
the individual bills and amendments, are directly
counter to what 80% or more of the American people
want?
In other words, what there
is an awakening in foreign central banks that the
Bush Cheney Regime is not concerned about public
opinion polls anymore. It is not even concerned
with political popularity. And you have
heard this all this week, the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Acts
getting thrown back in the mix.
Now, all of a sudden, we understand what the P.A.T.R.I.O.T.
Acts mean. The regime doesn't have to be concerned
about its political popularity anymore.
As Trichet pointed out, (and it's odd that the ECB
bank chief has to point this out, since no one in
the U.S. press points this out.), all of the remaining
Bushonian economic policies, like the extra $70-billion
tax cut for the Republican rich and the targeted
estate tax elimination for the Republican rich, etc.–are
designed as a last shot, as it were, in transferring
as much wealth in the nation from the bottom 80%
to the top 20%. Even the Bank of England has pointed
this out. These foreign central banks can't understand
why the American people aren't up in arms -- or don't
see what this regime is doing.
... But it is unusual for this to even get in the
news, for it even to be a news item. The only reason
it has gotten into the news a little bit is because
of the unusual size and the angst with which money
has been taken out of this country this week. There
is angst about it that you haven't seen before, as
if there's another shoe to drop someplace. And that's
exactly what the market is concerned about. It's
odd: How the markets are trading is they're being
roiled by a combination of all the aforementioned,
but they're also trading like they're walking on
eggshells, like there's another big shoe out there
to drop.
Besides a possible Cheney indictment, what else
could it be? We don't know
what that shoe is. It's not even the Cheney possible
indictment. It would have to be something bigger
than that.
People think -- Oh, well, George Bush, there's still
a democratic political process. Pro-Bush faction
Republicans still have to bow to public pressure
and what public opinion polls say. No. The Gallup-Harris
poll showed that 81% of the American people wanted
Hurricane Katrina and relief deficit-financed reconstruction
spending paid for by budgetary reductions. How is
the Regime financing this $100 billion in spending?
It is deficit-financed. No budgetary reductions,
and no cut in pork.
Now, in another Business Week poll, 78% of the people
are against this special $70-billion tax cut for
the Republican rich for next year. Yet it's been
passed. It goes on and on. 61% of the people are
against the elimination of so-called targeted estate
tax elimination. It's targeted, not blanket. This
is a targeted elimination estate tax, only for those
with a net worth above $10 million. Yet the regime
has passed that.
53% of the American people want an immediate withdrawal
of troop forces from Iraq, yet the Regime says we
will be placing more troops in Iraq between now and
the end of the year. The majority of the people want
a reduction in spending on Iraq, yet the regime is
going to spend $80 billion more in Iraq next year
than it did last year.
It doesn't take much of a brain to understand that
the regime is no longer concerned about public opinion.
Why does it have to be?
We, the people, agreed with
the P.A.T.R.I.O.T Acts. We, the people, gave the
President of the United States the absolute power
to cancel elections permanently with no interference
from Congress or the Supreme Court. Can what is
happening today come as any surprise to anyone? It's
a natural progression. And the markets are reacting.
Could the "other shoe" for the economy have
to do with the strange hysteria about Bird Flu or with
some other "natural" disaster? Imagine
what the travel restrictions Bush loves to talk about
would mean for the economy, especially when the travel
restrictions would apply to food as well as people.
Add to that the possible "destruction" of
millions of chickens and the economic consequences
could be disastrous.
Next time you are in an airport in the United States,
look at the number of business travelers. To
make a single, national economy out of a continent-sized
area, people and goods need to be able to move around
at will. That, in turn, depends on low energy/transportation
costs and freedom of movement. With rising energy
prices and the growing clampdown, both of these things
are at risk.
Now, in the "for what it's worth" department,
we have the interesting experiments in the predictive
power of web bots developed at HalfPastHuman.com. The
idea is that future events seem to cast a sort of subconscious
shadow backwards in time, shadows that can be identified
in the collective discourse using web bot technology. The
track record of this experiment has been surprisingly
good. The results are summarized regularly on
George Ure's web site, Urban
Survival.
I can't tell you how many people have written
to me this morning literally "freaked out" by
the story this morning that use the precise phrase "restrictions
on travel" which the web bot forecasts from www.halfpasthuman.com have
been talking about for months.
First, the story: CNN is now reporting that "Sustained
person-to-person spread of the bird flu or any
other super-influenza strain anywhere in the world
could prompt the United States to implement travel
restrictions or other steps to block a brewing
pandemic, say federal plans released Wednesday."
Now, the background: Since early July 2001,
we have been using a proprietary software technology
developed by our colleagues at www.halfpasthuman.com to
learn up to 12-months in advance, what the emotional
flavor of future events will be...
Besides catching significant aspects of the 9/11
attack, and the emotional flavor of events with good
accuracy, the anthrax attack, the space shuttle disaster,
significant aspects of the DC sniper case, a nearly
precise call on the Northeast
Power Outage months before it happened, the Sumatra
earthquake, and more recently the quake in Pakistan
which was characterized as a quake where we saw a "city
sliding down a hill" - not to mention the hurricane
forecast from January of this year which led to a
city be "returned to the mud" (New Orleans,
for sure), the comments about "restrictions
on travel" have been showing up in the predictive
runs for a long time - nearly a year.
Some examples, shared exclusively here with the
kind permission of the software wizard and his apprentice
at www.halfpasthuman.com:
- From the April 3, 2005 ALTA 405 series: "We
do note though that the Terra entity has repeated
references to the [rainwater] and [standstill]
of earlier parts of this report, and has reinforced
the image of [trucks] (waiting) in (mud) for
(abundant/excessive/large) [rain clouds] to
(depart). And, this section is cross linked
back to the Populace entity and the issues
of 'food restrictions'."
- The April 10, 2005 report continued the theme: "This
'restricted movement' period is seen as beginning
this summer and stretching through to the end
of the year if not beyond. While there are
no indications of a general restriction, and
rather merely lots of local restrictions all
due to a variety of causes, we do note that
the impact will be so general as to permeate
the consciousness of the populace and is seen
as arising in mainstream media. Within
the more narrow focus of this specific data
set, there are further descriptors which go
to the idea of a 'fiat' imposed [period/span]
of [restricted] (movement), which is then [lifted]
as (redemption) of the [circumstances/set/setting/array]
are (corrected). Hanging
off of this set, mostly fully populated is
another aspect set which shows that a [dichotomy/duality/opposition]
of view point about the [incident] will form
in which [government], that is, the upper echelon
who imposed the movement ban, will perceive
of this as just [regular/ordinary] business,
and totally miss the profound change that develops
from the Populace perception of the 'in situ'
imposition."
- In the July (ALTA 905 series) run, things begin
to come into focus a bit more: "One
co-incident change is that the Populace/USofA is
going to take up the cry that the 'rules are too
strict'. This however is just hardly begun, when
the rules are shown by our data of actually getting
very much stricter in that a period of 'no movement'
will be called for on a national level. While our
data shows that this is a travel restriction sort
of thing, it does not show any signs or indicators
for terrorism or war, rather this seems to somehow
be weather related. There are some small hints
that disease will be referenced, but not as a primary
motivator for the period of 'no movement'. We
have to also note that this could easily be something
on the order of a bank holiday, or a freezing of
currency exchanges, as there are no clear indications
that it will be a restriction imposed on the movements
of humans. But clearly the data is indicating that
a 'restriction of movement' will impact a large
part of the population just as calls get started
for the removing of the 'too strict rules'."
- In September, the ALTA 1305 series ties restrictions
of travel and food: "These
included the [rainstorms] seen as impediments to
movement of food, as well as the now emerging summertime
shakes. Leaving aside such details, we perhaps
should focus on the emerging design pattern of
restrictions on the availability of food and food
types which is currently seen as being of long
term duration within our modelspace. The entities
continue to show dominating trends toward restricted
food plants as we move the model through time at
least as far as we are able to currently project
which goes out to about February of 2006."
- Lastly, in the most recent of runs, October 29th,
we see how this threat of travel restrictions will
being to cast a shadow over the country in December: "The
Populace/USofA entity is showing via cross links
that the 'shocks' of November will lead to 'restricted
movement'. This is being interpreted as that, rather
than 'scarcity' as there are both appearing within
the entity. The suggestion from the originating
cross links is that a combination of 'secrets revealed'
and a run-in with 'scarcity' will lead much of
the populace of the country into a period of 'restricted
movement'. This may well be indicating a very very
bad holiday travel season."
...What's curious is the timing. While
our friends at www.halfpasthuman.com with
the future scanning technology don't have anything
looking like a terrorist attack on the horizon,
there continue to be troubling references in coming
months to economic impacts, restrictions of travel,
or some variant of that which linguistically translates
to "encounter with scarcity." What
drives it, we may unfortunately get a taste of
before the end of the month.
The Global Upwelling
Along the same lines, our colleagues
label the period we're in now (and will be for a
year or so longer) as a period of growing "militancy" which
will segue into
a period of "conflict."
Hmm... Restrictions in the availability of food and
types of food available, an "encounter with scarcity" in
the near future, these things don't really sound that
farfetched. The range of produce that has been
available in the middle of winter in the north of the
United States is not something normal in any sense.
Such amazing availability of different types of food
result from low energy prices. Petroleum is necessary
at every level of food production, from seed to transportation
to market. If the price of energy goes up sharply,
and it already has, it doesn't take a web bot to see
that this era of plenty will end. Of course, who needs
web bots when we have George Bush's words and deeds
to go by... The plans aren't secret anymore. With
the PATRIOT Act, they don't have to be secret.
Then, if you add cascading personal and corporate
bankruptcies to the mix as well as various natural
disasters whose psychological effect will be multiplied
by the media, and an unpopular war being fought despite
the wishes of the public in all of the countries involved,
then it is not out of the question that serious discontent
will manifest itself among the public. The effects
of that will surely not be good since the militarization
of domestic law enforcement and disaster relief has
already been put in place. Detroit, Fallujah, New Orleans,
Gaza, the Paris suburbs, it is all kind of blending
together, isn't it? |
The Venezuelan government will
distribute 14,000 houses before the end of 2005, as
part of socio-economic programs promoted by President
Hugo Chavez.
Housing Minister Luis Figueroa said Saturday that
by December 31 no Venezuelan will remain in a shelter.
Figueroa said the government provided funds to purchase
houses and will construct others to help reduce housing
problems.
Venezuela is currently operating Mission Habitat to
solve construction problems faced by families and create
communities possessing all necessary services, from
education to health. |
The easiest way to understand
the institutional bias of western media is to analyze
reporting from the developing world. The economic summit
in Mar Del Plata, Argentina, provides an excellent
opportunity to evaluate the coverage and decide whether
such partiality exists.
Although tens of thousands of working people came
to protest George Bush and his suspiciously-named "free
trade" economic policies; they were invariably
smeared by the corporate media as "Leftists" or "radicals";
eliminating the possibility that they were simply
concerned citizens participating in the democratic
process. This is the familiar tactic of the media
to marginalize ordinary people whose interests don’t
correspond to those of the ruling elite.
"Latin America’s radical leftists took
to the streets on Friday," Jack Chang breathlessly
reported for Knight Ridder, but all the other news
outlets invoked the same disparaging language.
The main target at the event was Venezuelan President
Hugo Chavez, a leader who is invariably slandered by
the media with the monikers "leftist firebrand", "radical
president" (Financial Times) or fiery, populist
president (NY Times). At some point in every article,
Chavez is lumped together with Fidel Castro or Che
Guevara in a conspicuous attempt to dismiss him as
an anti-American troublemaker. In fact, Chavez was
among the first countries to come to America’s
aid following Hurricane Katrina, offering doctors,
medicine and oil to the devastated region. No major
media source publicly credited him for his charitable
contributions.
Chavez, of course, is guilty of redistributing some
of Venezuela’s prodigious oil wealth to the poor
and needy of his country. This has made him an imminent
threat to the entrenched oligarchy and their teammates
in the media.[...]
"We’ve come to bury FTAA," Chavez
roared to the capacity crowd. "I even brought
a shovel".
The Venezuelan president’s remarks were enthusiastically
applauded by the thousands in the crowd who chanted
back, "Fascist Bush, You are the terrorist".
Chavez was flanked by antiwar activist Cindy Sheehan
and former footballer Diego Maradona. Maradona added
to Chavez’s stinging repudiation of free trade
by calling Bush, "human rubbish." (This was
only reported in one outlet; the Australian based News.com)
Like many Argentines, Maradono believes that the US
policies precipitated Argentina’s economic meltdown
which left 40% of the population living in poverty.
Most of the articles failed to report this crucial
fact which contextualizes the negative sentiment that
many in the south feel for America. It has nothing
to do with the "fiery oratory" of Chavez,
but a clear grasp of the devastating effects of US
free trade policies.
The majority of Latin Americans are now opposed to
the creation of a free trade region in the Americas.
They are also against the repayment of the foreign
debt and the growing threat of US militarization. They
are increasingly frustrated with the increasing disparity
of wealth between rich and poor as well as with rising
unemployment.
Again, none of these factors has anything to do with
Chavez who is mistakenly held responsible for inciting
hatred of America.
Chavez has, however, been a unifying figure who has
shared his oil wealth with other countries in the region
and created an alternate economic model, Mercosur,
which challenges the US’s dominance in the hemisphere.
It was a stunning blow to the Bush team when free trade
loyalist Vicente Fox announced at the summit that Mexico
would be joining Mercosur.
Chavez’s comments only added insult to injury:
"The planet is being destroyed under our own
noses by the capitalist model, the destructive engine
of development. Every day there is more hunger, more
misery, thanks to the neo-liberal, capitalist model."
The rejection of FTAA is a mainstream position emerging
from the political awakening of the people themselves.
Simply put, the methods applied by the Washington Consensus
have been tried and have failed rather spectacularly.
The new majority doesn’t want to "destroy
local industry, roll back social safety nets and labor
protections", destroy the environment, or prolong
America’s supremacy in the region.
"We have come to bury FTAA because it’s
an old project of the imperial eagle that from the
beginning planned to sink its claws into Latin America," said
Chavez.
The media coverage of the summit obscured the details
that would have provided the necessary background for
understanding the rage at Bush’s appearance.
The event was framed as a "showdown" between
Chavez and Bush. Even on this superficial level the
corporate media demonstrated its deftness at tip-toeing
around what really took place. As Reuters pointed out,
the strutting Texan, who exudes confidence and courage
behind a phalanx of security guards and concertina
wire, "carefully avoided" Chavez while the
world waited with baited-breath.
"Carefully avoided"!?!
"This summit is not about Hugo Chavez," one
Bush advisor said defensively. "This is not news."
But, of course, it is news. And, when the word gets
out that the boastful Bush slinked out of Argentina
rather than face his arch-rival, it will be very big
news indeed. |
On the fourth
anniversary of the September 11th attacks, Laura Knight-Jadczyk
announced the availability of her latest book:
In the years since the 9/11 attacks, dozens of books
have sought to explore the truth behind the official
version of events that day - yet to date, none of
these publications has provided a satisfactory answer
as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately
responsible for carrying them out.
Taking a broad, millennia-long perspective, Laura
Knight-Jadczyk's 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth uncovers the true nature of
the ruling elite on our planet and presents new and
ground-breaking insights into just how the 9/11 attacks
played out.
9/11: The Ultimate
Truth makes a strong case for the idea that September
11, 2001 marked the moment when our planet entered
the final phase of a diabolical plan that has been
many, many years in the making. It is a plan developed
and nurtured by successive generations of ruthless
individuals who relentlessly exploit the negative
aspects of basic human nature to entrap humanity as
a whole in endless wars and suffering in order to
keep us confused and distracted to the reality of
the man behind the curtain.
Drawing on historical and genealogical sources, Knight-Jadczyk
eloquently links the 9/11 event to the modern-day
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. She also cites the clear
evidence that our planet undergoes periodic natural
cataclysms, a cycle that has arguably brought humanity
to the brink of destruction in the present day.
For its no nonsense style in cutting to the core
of the issue and its sheer audacity in refusing to
be swayed or distracted by the morass of disinformation
that has been employed by the Powers that Be to cover
their tracks, 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth can rightly claim to be THE
definitive book on 9/11 - and what that fateful day's
true implications are for the future of mankind.
Published by Red Pill Press
Order the book today at our bookstore. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|