|
"You get America out of Iraq and
Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism."
- Cindy Sheehan
|
P I C T U R E
O F T H E D A Y
©2005 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
Every parent knows the feeling
of seeing one of their children in pain, sick, gazing
up with a beseeching look of
"Make it stop!" It has been often remarked
that it is unnatural for a parent to outlive a child,
the gut-wrenching heartache, the visceral screaming from
deep within, the anguished cry of "Why!"
Cindy Sheehan is transmuting her agony at the loss
of her son by demanding that the culprit, George
W. Bush, be held accountable, that he take the time
to acknowledge her suffering and answer the simple
question of "Why?" She speaks to all parents;
we all recognise her pain as it lives in a dark corner
of all of our imaginations.
One of the propaganda goals when a country goes to
war is the successful transformation of the enemy from
human being with hopes and fears, family and friends
just like ourselves, into sub-human monsters who eat
their young. Brutalised to consider the enemy as wholly other,
we no longer care about their losses, about the mothers
and fathers weeping at the deaths of their young men
and woman. We no longer care when we hear that as many
as one million Iraqi children died as a result of the
US-backed and UN-imposed sanctions after the first
Gulf War.
"We think it was worth it," infamously responded
Madeleine Albright on CBS in 1996.
When you kill a country's children, you are killing
its future.
Every town in France has a cenotaph with the names
of the children sacrificed during the First World War.
To what?
Yet there is a more subtle killing of our children
that goes on every day, the killing of the spirit that
happens in school. Curious children, open to the world,
are turned into consumers and cogs in the corporate
machinery, learning how to sit still, follow orders,
respond to bells like Pavlovian dogs, memorise and
recite, and refrain from asking questions. What they
don't learn how to do is think.
Most people who pass through American schools don't
even learn how to read. As John Taylor Gatto points
out in his book The
Underground History of American Education:
The National Adult Literacy Survey represents
190 million U.S. adults over age sixteen with an
average school attendance of 12.4 years. The survey
is conducted by the Educational Testing Service
of Princeton, New Jersey. It ranks adult Americans
into five levels. Here is its 1993 analysis:
- Forty-two million Americans over the age of
sixteen can’t read. Some of this group
can write their names on Social Security cards
and fill in height, weight, and birth spaces
on application forms.
- Fifty million can recognize printed words on
a fourth- and fifth-grade level. They cannot write
simple messages or letters.
- Fifty-five to sixty million are limited to sixth-,
seventh-, and eighth-grade reading. A majority
of this group could not figure out the price per
ounce of peanut butter in a 20-ounce jar costing
$1.99 when told they could round the answer off
to a whole number.
- Thirty million have ninth- and tenth-grade reading
proficiency. This group (and all preceding) cannot
understand a simplified written explanation of
the procedures used by attorneys and judges in
selecting juries.
- About 3.5 percent of the 26,000-member sample
demonstrated literacy skills adequate to do traditional
college study, a level 30 percent of all U.S. high
school students reached in 1940, and which 30 percent
of secondary students in other developed countries
can reach today. This last fact alone should warn
you how misleading comparisons drawn from international
student competitions really are, since the samples
each country sends are small elite ones, unrepresentative
of the entire student population. But behind the
bogus superiority a real one is concealed.
- Ninety-six and a half percent
of the American population is mediocre to illiterate
where deciphering print is concerned. This
is no commentary on their intelligence, but without
ability to take in primary information from print
and to interpret it they are at the mercy of
commentators who tell them what things mean.
A working definition of immaturity might include
an excessive need for other people to interpret
information for us.
Think about it. "Ninety-six and a half percent
of the American population is mediocre to illiterate
where deciphering print is concerned."
That is such an astonishing figure.
What are we doing to our children?
How did it happen?
Gatto offers some insight. |
The Makers of Modern [American]
Schooling
The real makers of modern schooling weren't at all
who we think.
Not Cotton Mather.
Not Horace Mann.
Not John Dewey.
The real makers of modern schooling were leaders
of the new American industrialist class, men like:
Andrew Carnegie, the
steel baron...
John D. Rockefeller,
the duke of oil...
Henry Ford, master of the assembly
line which compounded steel and oil into a vehicular
dynasty...
and J.P. Morgan, the king of capitalist
finance...
Men like these, and the brilliant efficiency expert Frederick
W. Taylor, who inspired the entire "social
efficiency" movement of the early twentieth
century, along with providing the new Soviet Union
its operating philosophy and doing the same job for
Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany; men who dreamed bigger
dreams than any had dreamed since Napoleon or Charlemagne,
these were the makers of modern schooling.
If modern schooling has a “Fourth Purpose,” there
must be an earlier three.
Traditional forms of instruction in America,
even before the Revolution, had three specific purposes:
- To make good people
- To make good citizens
- And to make each student find some particular
talents to develop to the maximum.
The new mass schooling which came about slowly but
continuously after 1890, had a different purpose, a "fourth" purpose.
The fourth purpose steadily squeezed the traditional
three to the margins of schooling; in the
fourth purpose, school in America became like school
in Germany, a servant of corporate and political
management.
We should reveal the mechanism of mind control
training, habits, and attitudes.
Children were literally trained in bad habits
and bad attitudes!
Teachers and principals, “scientifically”certified
in teachers college practices, were made unaware
of the invisible curriculum they really taught.
The secret of commerce, that kids drive purchases,
meant that schools had to become psychological laboratories
where training in consumerism was the central pursuit.
Since bored people are the best consumers,
school had to be a boring place, and since childish
people are the easiest customers to convince, the manufacture
of childishness, extended into adulthood, had to be
the first priority of factory schools. Naturally, teachers
and administrators weren't let in on this plan; they
didn't need to be. If they didn't conform to instructions
passed down from increasingly centralized school offices,
they didn't last long.
In the new system, schools were gradually
re-formed to meet the pressing need of big businesses to
have standardized customers and employees, standardized
because such people are predictable in certain crucial
ways by mathematical formulae. Business (and government)
can only be efficient if human beings are redesigned
to meet simplified specifications. As the century
wore on, school spaces themselves were opened bit
by bit to commercialization.
These processes didn't advance evenly.
Some localities resisted more than others, some decades
were more propitious for the plan than others. Especially
during and just after national emergencies like WWI,
the Depression, WWII, and the Sputnik crisis, the scheme
rocketed forward; in quieter moments it was becalmed
or even forced to give up some ground.
But even in moments of greatest resistance,
the institutions controlling the fourth purpose—great
corporations, great universities, government bureaus
with vast powers to reward or punish, and corporate
journalism—increasingly centralized in fewer
and fewer hands throughout the twentieth century, kept
a steady hand on the tiller. They had ample resources
to wear down and outwait the competition.
The prize was of inestimable value--control
of the minds of the young.
After 1900 the new mass schooling arenas
slowly became impersonal places where children
were viewed as HUMAN RESOURCES. Whenever you hear
this term, you are certain to be in the presence
of employees of the fourth purpose, however unwitting.
Human resource children are to be molded and shaped
for something called "The Workplace," even
though for most of American history American children
were reared to expect to create their own workplaces.
In the new workplace, most Americans were slated to
work for large corporations or large government agencies,
if they worked at all.
This revolution in the composition of the
American dream produced some unpleasant byproducts. Since
systematic forms of employment demand that employees
specialize their efforts in one or another function
of systematic production, then clear thinking warns
us that incomplete people make the
best corporate and government employees.
Earlier Americans like Madison and Jefferson were
well aware of this paradox, which our own time
has forgotten. And if that is so, mutilation in the interests
of later social efficiency has to be one of the biggest
tasks assigned to forced schooling.
Not only was the new form of institution
spiritually dangerous as a matter of course,
but school became a physically dangerous
place as well.
What better way to habituate kids to abandoning
trust in their peers (and themselves) than
to create an atmosphere of constant low-level stress
and danger, relief from which is only available by
appeal to authority? And many times not even then!
Horace Mann had sold forced schooling to industrialists
of the mid-nineteenth century as the best "police" to
create moral children, but ironically, as it turned
out in the twentieth century, big business and big
government were best served by making schoolrooms antechambers
to Hell.
As the twentieth century progressed,
and particularly after WWII, schools evolved into behavioral
training centers, laboratories of experimentation in
the interests of corporations and the government. The
original model for this development had been Prussian
Germany, but few remembered.
School became jail-time to escape if you
could, arenas of meaningless pressure as
with the omnipresent "standardized" exams,
which study after study concluded were measuring
nothing real.
For instance, take the case of Bill Bradley. . .
and George W. Bush,
two of the four finalists in the 2000 presidential
race. Bradley had a horrifying 480 on the verbal part
of his own SATs, yet graduated from Princeton, won
a Rhodes Scholarship, and became a senator; Bush graduated
from Yale, became governor of Texas, and president
of the United States—with a mediocre 550.
If you can become governor, senator, and
president with mediocre SAT scores, what exactly
do the tests measure?
Perhaps they sort out good scientists from
bad? If so, how is it that both the scientists
principally involved in the Human Genome Project
have strange scholarly backgrounds to say the least!
Francis S. Collins, the head of
the public portion, was homeschooled, never followed
any type of formal curriculum, and is a born-again
Christian.
Craig Venter was a very bad boy
in high school, a surfing bum who nearly flunked out,
and he didn't go to college after graduation, but into
the U.S. Army as an enlisted man before being shipped
off to Vietnam!
As you'll learn when you read The Underground
History of American Education the
new purpose of schooling—to serve business
and government—could only be achieved efficiently
by isolating children from the real world, with
adults who themselves were isolated from the real
world, and everyone in the confinement isolated
from one another.
Only then could the necessary training in boredom
and bewilderment begin. Such training is necessary
to produce dependable consumers and dependent citizens
who would always look for a teacher to tell them what
to do in later life, even if that teacher was an ad
man or television anchor.
The rationale, history, and dynamics of Fourth Purpose
school procedure are carefully examined in The
Underground History of American Education. |
AGAINST
SCHOOL
How public education cripples our
kids, and why |
-
By John Taylor Gatto
-
-
John Taylor Gatto is a former
New York State and New York City Teacher of the
-
Year and the author, most recently,
of The Underground History of American
-
Education. He was a participant
in the Harper's Magazine forum "School on
a Hill,"
-
which appeared in the September
2001 issue.
|
- I taught for thirty years in some of the worst
schools in Manhattan, and in some of the best, and
during that time I became an expert in boredom. Boredom
was everywhere in my world, and if you asked the
kids, as I often did, why they felt so bored, they
always gave the same answers: They said the work
was stupid, that it made no sense, that they already
knew it. They said they wanted to be doing something
real, not just sitting around. They said teachers
didn't seem to know much about their subjects and
clearly weren't interested in learning more. And
the kids were right: their teachers were every bit
as bored as they were.
-
- Boredom is the common condition of schoolteachers,
and anyone who has spent time in a teachers' lounge
can vouch for the low energy, the whining, the dispirited
attitudes, to be found there. When asked why they feel
bored, the teachers tend to blame the kids, as you
might expect. Who wouldn't get bored teaching students
who are rude and interested only in grades? If even
that. Of course, teachers are themselves products of
the same twelve-year compulsory school programs that
so thoroughly bore their students, and as school personnel
they are trapped inside structures even more rigid
than those imposed upon the children. Who, then, is
to blame?
-
- We all are. My grandfather
taught me that. One afternoon when I was seven I
complained to him of boredom, and he batted me hard
on the head. He told me that I was never to use that
term in his presence again, that if I was bored it
was my fault and no one else's. The obligation to
amuse and instruct myself was entirely my own, and
people who didn't know that were childish people,
to be avoided if possible. Certainty not to be trusted. That
episode cured me of boredom forever, and here and
there over the years I was able to pass on the lesson
to some remarkable student. For the most part, however,
I found it futile to challenge the official notion
that boredom and childishness were the natural state
of affairs in the classroom. Often I had to defy
custom, and even bend the law, to help kids break
out of this trap.
-
- The empire struck back, of course; childish adults
regularly conflate opposition with disloyalty. I once
returned from a medical leave to discover that all
evidence of my having been granted the leave had been
purposely destroyed, that my job had been terminated,
and that I no longer possessed even a teaching license.
After nine months of tormented effort I was able to
retrieve the license when a school secretary testified
to witnessing the plot unfold. In the meantime my family
suffered more than I care to remember. By the time
I finally retired in 1991, I had more than enough reason
to think of our schools-with their long-term, cell-block-style,
forced confinement of both students and teachers-as
virtual factories of childishness. Yet I honestly could
not see why they had to be that way. My own experience
had revealed to me what many other teachers must learn
along the way, too, yet keep to themselves for fear
of reprisal: if we wanted to we could easily and inexpensively
jettison the old, stupid structures and help kids take
an education rather than merely receive a schooling.
We could encourage the best qualities of youthfulness-curiosity,
adventure, resilience, the capacity for surprising
insight simply by being more flexible about time, texts,
and tests, by introducing kids to truly competent adults,
and by giving each student what autonomy he or she
needs in order to take a risk every now and then.
-
- But we don't do that. And the
more I asked why not, and persisted in thinking about
the "problem" of schooling as an engineer
might, the more I missed the point: What if there
is no "problem" with our schools? What
if they are the way they are, so expensively flying
in the face of common sense and long experience in
how children learn things, not because they are doing
something wrong but because they are doing something
right? Is it possible
that George W. Bush accidentally spoke the truth
when he said we would "leave no child behind"?
Could it be that our schools are designed to make
sure not one of them ever really grows up?
-
- Do we really need school? I don't mean education,
just forced schooling: six classes a day, five days
a week, nine months a year, for twelve years. Is this
deadly routine really necessary? And if so, for what?
Don't hide behind reading, writing, and arithmetic
as a rationale, because 2 million happy homeschoolers
have surely put that banal justification to rest. Even
if they hadn't, a considerable number of well-known
Americans never went through the twelve-year wringer
our kids currently go through, and they turned out
all right. George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas
Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln? Someone taught them, to
be sure, but they were not products of a school system,
and not one of them was ever "graduated" from
a secondary school. Throughout most of American history,
kids generally didn't go to high school, yet the unschooled
rose to be admirals, like Farragut; inventors, like
Edison; captains of industry like Carnegie and Rockefeller;
writers, like Melville and Twain and Conrad; and even
scholars, like Margaret Mead. In fact, until pretty
recently people who reached the age of thirteen weren't
looked upon as children at all. Ariel Durant, who co-wrote
an enormous, and very good, multivolume history of
the world with her husband, Will, was happily married
at fifteen, and who could reasonably claim that Ariel
Durant was an uneducated person? Unschooled, perhaps,
but not uneducated.
-
- We have been taught (that is,
schooled) in this country to think of "success" as
synonymous with, or at least dependent upon, "schooling," but
historically that isn't true in either an intellectual
or a financial sense. And plenty of people
throughout the world today find a way to educate
themselves without resorting to a system of compulsory
secondary schools that all too often resemble prisons.
Why, then, do Americans confuse education with just
such a system? What exactly is the purpose of our
public schools?
-
- Mass schooling of a compulsory nature really got
its teeth into the United States between 1905 and 1915,
though it was conceived of much earlier and pushed
for throughout most of the nineteenth century. The
reason given for this enormous upheaval of family life
and cultural traditions was, roughly speaking, threefold:
-
- 1) To make good people. 2)
To make good citizens. 3) To make each person his
or her personal best. These goals are still
trotted out today on a regular basis, and most of
us accept them in one form or another as a decent
definition of public education's mission, however
short schools actually fall in achieving them. But
we are dead wrong. Compounding our error is the fact
that the national literature holds numerous and surprisingly
consistent statements of compulsory schooling's true
purpose. We have, for example, the great H. L. Mencken,
who wrote in The American Mercury for April
1924 that the aim of public
education is not
-
- to fill the young of the species
with knowledge and awaken their intelligence. ...
Nothing could be further from the truth. The aim
... is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible
to the same safe level, to breed and train a standardized
citizenry, to put down dissent and originality. That
is its aim in the United States... and that is its
aim everywhere else.
-
- Because of Mencken's reputation as a satirist, we
might be tempted to dismiss this passage as a bit of
hyperbolic sarcasm. His article,
however, goes on to trace the template for our own
educational system back to the now vanished, though
never to be forgotten, military state of Prussia. And
although he was certainly aware of the irony that we
had recently been at war with Germany, the heir to
Prussian thought and culture, Mencken was being perfectly
serious here. Our educational system really is Prussian
in origin, and that really is cause for concern.
-
- The odd fact of a Prussian provenance for our schools
pops up again and again once you know to look for it.
William James alluded to it many times at the turn
of the century. Orestes Brownson, the hero of Christopher
Lasch's 1991 book, The True and Only Heaven,
was publicly denouncing the Prussianization of American
schools back in the 1840s. Horace Mann's "Seventh
Annual Report" to the Massachusetts State Board
of Education in 1843 is essentially a paean to the
land of Frederick the Great and a call for its schooling
to be brought here. That Prussian culture loomed large
in America is hardly surprising, given our early association
with that utopian state. A Prussian served as Washington's
aide during the Revolutionary War, and so many German-speaking
people had settled here by 1795 that Congress considered
publishing a German-language edition of the federal
laws. But what shocks is that
we should so eagerly have adopted one of the very worst
aspects of Prussian culture: an educational system
deliberately designed to produce mediocre intellects,
to hamstring the inner life, to deny students appreciable
leadership skills, and to ensure docile and incomplete
citizens in order to render the populace "manageable."
-
- It was from James Bryant Conant-president of Harvard
for twenty years, WWI poison-gas specialist, WWII executive
on the atomic-bomb project, high commissioner of the
American zone in Germany after WWII, and truly one
of the most influential figures of the twentieth century-that
I first got wind of the real purposes of American schooling.
Without Conant, we would probably not have the same
style and degree of standardized testing that we enjoy
today, nor would we be blessed with gargantuan high
schools that warehouse 2,000 to 4,000 students at a
time, like the famous Columbine High in Littleton,
Colorado. Shortly after I retired
from teaching I picked up Conant's 1959 book-length
essay, The Child the Parent and the State,
and was more than a little intrigued to see him mention
in passing that the modem schools we attend were the
result of a "revolution" engineered between
1905 and 1930. A revolution? He declines to elaborate,
but he does direct the curious and the uninformed to
Alexander Inglis's 1918 book, Principles of Secondary
Education, in which "one saw this revolution
through the eyes of a revolutionary."
-
- Inglis, for whom a lecture in education
at Harvard is named, makes it perfectly clear that
compulsory schooling on this continent was intended
to be just what it had been for Prussia in the 1820s:
a fifth column into the burgeoning democratic movement
that threatened to give the peasants and the proletarians
a voice at the bargaining table. Modern, industrialized,
compulsory schooling was to make a sort of surgical
incision into the prospective unity of these underclasses.
Divide children by subject, by age-grading, by constant
rankings on tests, and by many other more subtle means,
and it was unlikely that the ignorant mass of mankind,
separated in childhood, would ever re-integrate into
a dangerous whole.
-
- Inglis breaks down the purpose - the actual purpose
- of modem schooling into six basic functions, any
one of which is enough to curl the hair of those innocent
enough to believe the three traditional goals listed
earlier:
-
- 1) The adjustive or adaptive function.
Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction
to authority. This, of course, precludes critical
judgment completely. It also pretty much destroys
the idea that useful or interesting material should
be taught, because you can't test for reflexive obedience
until you know whether you can make kids learn, and
do, foolish and boring things.
-
- 2) The integrating function.
This might well be called "the conformity function," because
its intention is to make children as alike as possible. People
who conform are predictable, and this is of great
use to those who wish to harness and manipulate a
large labor force.
-
- 3) The diagnostic and directive function.
School is meant to determine each student's proper
social role. This is done by logging evidence
mathematically and anecdotally on cumulative records.
As in "your permanent record." Yes, you
do have one.
-
- 4) The differentiating function.
Once their social role has been "diagnosed," children
are to be sorted by role and trained only so far
as their destination in the social machine merits
- and not one step further. So much for making
kids their personal best.
5) The selective function.
This refers not to human choice at all but to Darwin's
theory of natural selection as applied to what
he called "the favored races." In short,
the idea is to help things along by consciously
attempting to improve the breeding stock. Schools
are meant to tag the unfit - with poor grades,
remedial placement, and other punishments - clearly
enough that their peers will accept them as inferior
and effectively bar them from the reproductive
sweepstakes. That's what all those little
humiliations from first grade onward were intended
to do: wash the dirt down the drain.
6) The propaedeutic function.
The societal system implied by these rules will
require an elite group of caretakers. To that end,
a small fraction of the kids will quietly be taught
how to manage this continuing project, how to watch
over and control a population deliberately dumbed
down and declawed in order that government might
proceed unchallenged and corporations might never
want for obedient labor.
- That, unfortunately, is the purpose of mandatory
public education in this country. And lest you take
Inglis for an isolated crank with a rather too cynical
take on the educational enterprise, you should know
that he was hardly alone in championing these ideas.
Conant himself, building on the ideas of Horace Mann
and others, campaigned tirelessly for an American school
system designed along the same lines. Men like George
Peabody, who funded the cause of mandatory schooling
throughout the South, surely understood that the Prussian
system was useful in creating not only a harmless electorate
and a servile labor force but also a virtual herd of
mindless consumers. In time a great number of industrial
titans came to recognize the enormous profits to be
had by cultivating and tending just such a herd via
public education, among them Andrew Carnegie and John
D. Rockefeller.
-
- There you have it. Now you
know. We don't need Karl Marx's conception of a grand
warfare between the classes to see that it is in
the interest of complex management, economic or political,
to dumb people down, to demoralize them, to divide
them from one another, and to discard them if they
don't conform. Class may frame the proposition,
as when Woodrow Wilson, then president of Princeton
University, said the following to the New York City
School Teachers Association in 1909: "We
want one class of persons to have a liberal education,
and we want another class of persons, a very much
larger class, of necessity, in every society, to
forgo the privileges of a liberal education and fit
themselves to perform specific difficult manual tasks." But
the motives behind the disgusting decisions that
bring about these ends need not be class-based at
all. They can stem purely from fear, or from the
by now familiar belief that "efficiency" is
the paramount virtue, rather than love, liberty,
laughter, or hope. Above all, they can stem from
simple greed.
-
- There were vast fortunes to be made, after all, in
an economy based on mass production and organized to
favor the large corporation rather than the small business
or the family farm. But mass
production required mass consumption, and at the turn
of the twentieth century most Americans considered
it both unnatural and unwise to buy things they didn't
actually need. Mandatory schooling was a godsend
on that count. School didn't
have to train kids in any direct sense to think they
should consume nonstop, because it did something even
better: it encouraged them not to think at all. And
that left them sitting ducks for another great invention
of the modem era - marketing.
-
- Now, you needn't have studied
marketing to know that there are two groups of people
who can always be convinced to consume more than
they need to: addicts and children. School has done
a pretty good job of turning our children into addicts,
but it has done a spectacular job of turning our
children into children. Again, this is no accident.
Theorists from Plato to Rousseau to our own Dr. Inglis
knew that if children could be cloistered with other
children, stripped of responsibility and independence,
encouraged to develop only the trivializing emotions
of greed, envy, jealousy, and fear, they would grow
older but never truly grow up. In the 1934
edition of his once well-known book Public Education
in the United States, Ellwood P. Cubberley detailed
and praised the way the strategy of successive school
enlargements had extended childhood by two to six
years, and forced schooling was at that point still
quite new. This same Cubberley - who was dean of
Stanford's School of Education, a textbook editor
at Houghton Mifflin, and Conant's friend and correspondent
at Harvard - had written the following in the 1922
edition of his book Public School Administration: "Our
schools are ... factories in which the raw products
(children) are to be shaped and fashioned .... And
it is the business of the school to build its pupils
according to the specifications laid down."
-
- It's perfectly obvious from our society today what
those specifications were. Maturity
has by now been banished from nearly every aspect of
our lives. Easy divorce laws have removed the need
to work at relationships; easy credit has removed the
need for fiscal self-control; easy entertainment has
removed the need to learn to entertain oneself; easy
answers have removed the need to ask questions. We
have become a nation of children, happy to surrender
our judgments and our wills to political exhortations
and commercial blandishments that would insult actual
adults. We buy televisions, and then we buy
the things we see on the television. We buy computers,
and then we buy the things we see on the computer.
We buy $150 sneakers whether we need them or not, and
when they fall apart too soon we buy another pair.
We drive SUVs and believe the lie that they constitute
a kind of life insurance, even when we're upside-down
in them. And, worst of all, we don't bat an eye when
Ari Fleischer tells us to "be careful what
you say," even if we remember having been told
somewhere back in school that America is the land of
the free. We simply buy that one too. Our schooling,
as intended, has seen to it.
-
- Now for the good news. Once you
understand the logic behind modern schooling, its tricks
and traps are fairly easy to avoid. School trains children
to be employees and consumers; teach your own to be
leaders and adventurers. School trains children to
obey reflexively; teach your own to think critically
and independently. Well-schooled kids have a low threshold
for boredom; help your own to develop an inner life
so that they'll never be bored. Urge them to take on
the serious material, the grown-up material, in history,
literature, philosophy, music, art, economics, theology
- all the stuff schoolteachers know well enough to
avoid. Challenge your kids with plenty of solitude
so that they can learn to enjoy their own company,
to conduct inner dialogues. Well-schooled people are
conditioned to dread being alone, and they seek constant
companionship through the TV, the computer, the cell
phone, and through shallow friendships quickly acquired
and quickly abandoned. Your children should have a
more meaningful life, and they can.
-
- First, though, we must wake
up to what our schools really are: laboratories of
experimentation on young minds, drill centers for
the habits and attitudes that corporate society demands.
Mandatory education serves children only incidentally;
its real purpose is to turn them into servants. Don't
let your own have their childhoods extended, not
even for a day. If David Farragut could take
command of a captured British warship as a pre-teen,
if Thomas Edison could publish a broadsheet at the
age of twelve, if Ben Franklin could apprentice himself
to a printer at the same age (then put himself through
a course of study that would choke a Yale senior
today), there's no telling what your own kids could
do. After a long life, and thirty years in the public
school trenches, I've concluded that genius is as
common as dirt. We suppress our genius only because
we haven't yet figured out how to manage a population
of educated men and women. The solution, I think,
is simple and glorious. Let them manage themselves.
|
Nearly 100,000 California 12th
graders - or about 20% of this year's senior
class - have failed the state's graduation exam,
potentially jeopardizing their chances of earning
diplomas, according to the most definitive report
on the mandatory test, released Friday.
Students in the class of 2006, the first group to
face the graduation requirement, must pass both the
English and math sections of the test by June
The exit exam - which has come under
criticism by some educators, legislators and civil
rights advocates - is geared to an eighth-grade level
in math and to ninth- and 10th-grade levels in English.
But the report by the Virginia-based Human Resources
Research Organization showed that tens of thousands
of students, particularly those in special education
and others who speak English as a second language,
may fail the test by the end of their senior year despite
remedial classes, after-school tutoring and other academic
help.
Teachers, according to the report, said that many
students arrive unprepared and unmotivated for their
high school courses and that their grades often reflect
poor attendance and low parental involvement.
The group reviewed the test results as part of a report
ordered by the Legislature when it instituted the exit
exam several years ago.
Among its findings: 63% of African Americans and 68%
of Latinos in the class of 2006 have passed both parts
of the exam.
By comparison, 89% of Asians and 90% of whites have
passed. The report recommended that the state keep
the exam but consider several alternatives for students
who can't pass.
"Clearly, we need to have some options for these
students," said Lauress L. Wise, the firm's president,
in a telephone interview with reporters.
The state, for example, could allow seniors to submit
portfolios of work that demonstrate mastery of English
and math, the report's authors suggested.
The report also proposed that schools allow students
to spend an extra year in high school or earn diplomas
by completing special summer school programs in lieu
of the exam.
Additionally, the state could establish
alternate diplomas or graduation certificates for students
who pass part of the exit exam, the group said.
But California's superintendent of public instruction,
Jack O'Connell, said he opposes any change that would
diminish the worth of a high school diploma.
"It's important to keep one core principle front
and center: awarding a student a diploma without the
skills and knowledge to back it up does the student
a disservice," said O'Connell, who added that
his staff would study the options outlined in the report.
The exit exam was originally slated for students in
the class of 2004. But disappointing passing rates
prompted state education officials to push the requirement
back two years. The state also shortened the test from
three days to two.
Students get several opportunities
to pass the exam in high school, and they have to correctly
answer only a little more than half of the questions
to succeed.
Even so, the exam has come under legal attack by disability
rights advocates who fear the effect on special education
students; just 35% of such students have passed both
parts of the exam so far. [...]
Opponents of the exam said that it
penalizes minority students and those in low-income
communities whose overcrowded schools often lack experienced
teachers and other necessary resources.
"It's
unfair to give this test because of the unequal school
system we have," said Edgar Sanchez, who teaches
U.S. history at Washington Preparatory High School
in South Los Angeles. "Every day I see students
go through conditions of overcrowding. Sometimes
students don't have a desk to sit at." [...] |
Friday was the last day of the
third quarter of 2005, so let's review the numbers
for the quarter and for the year.
The U.S. dollar closed at 0.8319 euros, up 0.2%
from 0.8306 for the week, down 1.0% from 0.8400 for
the quarter and up 12.6% from 0.7390 for the year.
Oil closed at $66.24 a barrel, up 3.2% from $64.19
last week and up 12.7% from $58.75 at the end of
Q2 and up 52.5% from $43.45 for the year. Oil in
euros was 55.11 euros a barrel, up 3.4% compared
to 53.31 a week ago and up 11.7% from 49.34 at the
end of the second quarter and and up 71.7% from 32.09
at the beginning of the year. Gold closed at 472.20
dollars an ounce on Friday, up 1.0% from $467.40
a week earlier and up 10.0% from $429.30 for the
quarter and up 8.0% from $437.10 for the year. In
euros, gold closed at 392.66 euros an ounce, up 1.1%
from 388.21 last week and up 8.9% from 360.51 for
the quarter and up 21.8% from 322.32 for the year.
The gold/oil ratio closed at 7.13 barrels of oil
per ounce of gold, down 8.3% from 7.28 last week
and down 2.4% from 7.31 for the quarter and down
down 41.1% from 10.06 for the year. In the U.S. stock
market, the Dow closed at 10,568.70, up 1.4% from
10,419.59 last week and up 2.6% from 10,303.44 at
the end of the second quarter and down 3.5% for the
year so far from 10,783 on December 31, 2004. The
NASDAQ closed at 2151.69 on Friday, up 1.6% from
2,116.84 on the previous Friday and up 4.6% from
2057.37 at the end of Q2 and down 1.1% from 2175
at the beginning of the year. The yield on the ten-year
U.S. Treasury note closed at 4.33 percent, up from
4.25 the week before, up from 4.04 at the end of
the second quarter and 4.22 on Dec. 31, 2004.
Here are some charts showing trends for 2005:
The big story for the year so far is the rise in the
price of oil and gold. Oil rose 53% in dollar
terms and a whopping 72% in euros. The euro lost ground
against the dollar so far this year, falling 12.6%,
something I did not predict at the beginning of the
year. This in spite of the fact that the United
States is in the process of losing two wars, wars which
were financed by borrowing money from foreign central
banks. Some of this loss in value for the euro
may end up being attributed to the rise in the price
of oil, which must be purchased in dollars, but some
may be due to the fact that European voters have wisely
rejected neoliberal prescriptions for their societies,
causing consternation among the elite. If the euro
lost, however, that did not mean that the dollar gained,
since the dollar lost 8% of its value compared to gold. The
euro lost 22% of its value compared to gold.
The United States was able to keep its economy from
crashing during the third quarter of 2005, in spite
of the ongoing disasters in Iraq and Afghanistan and
the embarrassing fiasco in New Orleans. At the
end of the previous quarter I wrote the following:
Stephen
Roach of Morgan Stanley is now saying that
the bubble-like asset inflation economy of the
United States could go on for a while longer,
making the ultimate reckoning even worse:
I suspect the US interest rate climate is likely
to remain surprisingly benign and, therefore,
supportive of yet another wave of debt-intensive
asset inflation. As a result, the housing
and bond bubbles could well continue to expand,
allowing asset-dependent American consumers to
keep on spending. US economic growth, in
that climate, may well remain surprisingly firm
-- even in the face of $60 oil. All this
would be a textbook example of another period
of "bad growth" -- the last thing an
unbalanced US and global economy needs. Likely
by-products of another spate of bad growth include
more debt, further reductions in income-based
saving, and an ever-widening current account
deficit. Eventually, the balance-of-payments
constraint will take over -- triggering a renewed
weakening of the dollar and a sharp back-up in
real interest rates. But the emphasis,
in this case, is on the word "eventually."
It looks like Roach was right. But it also looks like
the "eventually" is here, with interest rates
rising and the dollar weakening (against gold).
Why is gold rising so sharply now? No paper
currency looks good at the moment. Take the Yen, for
example:
Japan's
National Debt Hits US$ 7.1 Trillion
Japan's government debt, already the highest in
the industrialized world, rose 1.7 per cent to a
record high of 795.8 trillion yen ($7.1 trillion
US) at the end of June, according to a report released
by the Finance Ministry.
The latest figure marked an increase of 14.3 trillion
yen from the end of March, the ministry said Thursday.
The amount is equivalent to about 6.24 million yen
($55,900) for every Japanese.
Japan has relied on government bond issues to make
up for falling tax revenues, turning into one of
the world's most indebted countries.
Japan's public debt burden is almost 160 per cent
of its GDP and already the highest in the industrialized
world.
As Kevin at Cryptogon put
it:
How does this show stay up on a day to day basis?
HOW!? Japan is keeping the U.S. afloat by buying
up U.S. debt. But who's buying Japanese debt to
the tune of 7.1 trillion?
Don't get caught without a chair when the music
stops playing.
And the euro is in bad shape as well. Marshall
Auerback has this to say concerning the German
election and the recent increases in the price of
gold:
Political fragmentation induced by economic malaise
and high unemployment has finally tipped the euro
zone's largest economy into a full-blown political
crisis. Although gold has long been viewed
as the correlative of a weaker dollar, we have
always felt that its long term viability as a genuine
safe haven alternative rested on a broadening loss
of confidence in paper currencies in general. To
the extent that Germany's current political stalemate
creates further long term doubts about the future
viability of the euro zone, it helps to underpin
the gold price in euro terms.
Let us be clear: there is no imminent prospect
of the European Monetary Union imploding. But
the euro zone economies have continued to grow very
slowly, probably not much more than 1% a year. Unemployment
in Germany is 10% and is almost as high in the rest
of much of Europe. France, Germany and Italy are
all running significantly higher deficits than the
original Stability pact authorized and they have
a mockery of the agreement's legitimacy as a consequence. And
the increased doubts about the euro's long term viability
are creating a highly propitious psychological backdrop
for bullion.
...For all of the talk of Chancellor Schröder's
unexpected success in converting an anticipated landslide
defeat into a Parliamentary cliffhanger, the reality
is that both major parties performed abysmally, as
smaller parties ate into their traditional constituencies.
In fact, this election marked the first time since
1949 that the SPD and CDU failed to garner more than
70 per cent of the votes collectively. The
result appears to reflect the disillusionment of
the German electorate with the tired and overused
idea of "reform," correctly understanding
that there is not much if anything in it for them
the way it was presented by either of the two major
parties. As such the outcome represented a
repudiation of Germany's political class. It amounted
to a declaration by the voters that the solutions
on offer for Germany's problems and the ideas on
offer for Germany's future were unacceptable.
At some point the German
electorate could well put two and two together
and realize that it is this very political class
which junked the D-mark, and legislated away arguably
the most successful experiment in post-war monetary
management without even the hint of a referendum. This
is a problem for Germany's leadership and for the
other member states, because the single currency
project has over-promised and under-delivered. Indeed,
the manner in which Germany's post-war monetary
institutions and currency were casually discarded
is symptomatic of the profoundly undemocratic nature
of the European Union itself. Its concept
of democracy amounts to the will of the collective
trampling down individual national interests -
a collective without even a language in common,
which also explains why the French and Dutch voters
in the roundly rejected referenda on the European
Constitution held earlier this year. Denied similar
opportunities to express their views on the constitution
and the single currency before it, Germany's voters
have taken the only route open to them and rejected
their leadership.
What does this mean for the euro and gold? Criticism
of the single currency project has long been
a taboo topic in Germany, although this is no longer
the case in other euro zone countries. The
issue of euro withdrawal has been broached in Italy,
of all countries. Ironic, because Rome has
effectively had a free ride in the euro zone's integrated
bond markets for years, obtaining Germanic levels
of interest rates (as a consequence of Germany's
historic record of fiscal prudence), despite maintaining
historically retaining profligate levels of public
sector expenditure and debt to GDP ratios well in
excess of most of the other founding member states
in the monetary union.
But were Italy to withdraw ultimately from the euro
zone, this would expose other countries to Italian
competition, especially as this would almost certainly
be accompanied by a significant devaluation of the
newly restored Lira. Other countries with a
dominant manufacturing base, such as Germany, would
almost certainly come under pressure and the whole
system could, in these circumstances come under threat. Where
would investors turn at that juncture? The
resultant financial chaos could be considerable,
given the lack of a "plan B" in the event
that monetary union came under threat.
To a limited degree, the markets
already intuit this. It is noteworthy
that the start of gold's most recent rise has been
coincident with the French and Dutch referendum results
on the EU constitution last spring. Germany's
political crisis has provided yet another blow to
confidence in the euro zone and whilst the euro may
be under no imminent threat of dissolution, its manifold
structural weaknesses are becoming increasingly evident
to the markets. Gold's rise is a politically
incorrect reminder that the euro zone rests on the
tenuous foundations of bureaucratic legerdemain,
with no economic, cultural or political anchorage
to sustain it longer term.
The fundamental problems of the dollar have been well-documented,
with snowballing deficits reaching the point where
even Alan Greenspan says, of a Republican government,
that the deficits are "out of control." After
last week, with the indictment of U.S. House Majority
leader Tom DeLay for political money laundering, the
ongoing investigations into DeLay's close associate,
Jack Abramoff for a whole range of gangster-like activity,
including murder of a former business partner, the
SEC investigation into Senate Majority Leader Bill
Frist for massive inside trading, and the mysterious
drop in the stock price of Diebold, you have the real
possibility of a complete falling away of any confidence
by the U.S. population in the government, now seen
more in terms of an organized
crime takeover.
Since the rest of the world has already lost confidence
in U.S. political leadership, the only reason the dollar
has any value is pure fear.
With the present moment being so precarious, the near
term future looks frightening. Contrary to the
initial reports, Hurricane Rita has seriously damaged
the U.S oil refining and shipping infrastructure, an
infrastructure already insufficient to meet demand. Here
is what one industry insider (anonymous) was quoted
as saying on Urban
Survival:
OK, it's bad. There are dozens
of rigs and platforms damaged, missing or sunk.
Katrina put the whammy on production platforms,
and Rita slammed the drilling rigs...Some of the
rigs are upside down, others are twisted and destroyed,
still others are just plain gone...either sunk
or drifting.
As I have been telling anyone willing
to listen, there really is no such thing as Peak
Oil, as far as I can tell. The real problem is a
complete lack of infrastructure for moving and refining
oil and gas, as well as a serious shortage of drilling
rigs, tankers and refineries. The situation was close
to dire before the storms. It is critical now.
Over the past couple of decades, there has been
little investment in tankers, new drilling rigs and
refineries. As a consequence, we may be running out
of gasoline while drowning in oil. This is the cause
of the disconnect recently between pump price and
barrel cost. All the storage areas are full of oil,
the problem is there is no scalable means to refine
it and/or ship it. Even starting this minute, the
supply can not be increased by even one percent for
the next three to five years.
Should the next storm hit shipping, I can almost
guarantee the pump lines we recently saw in Houston
will be nationwide. I am fairly sure that we will
see them by Christmas, as it is. A cold winter will
virtually ensure radical price hikes in natural gas,
electricity and heating oil.
While this may sound alarmist, I assure you that
I am taking the best information from offshore interests,
as well as what I know about the industry into account.
The outcome will most likely not be pleasant, and
the time frame for the unpleasantness to start is
about one month, maybe slightly more. When you hear
Bush taking steps to limit gasoline usage in the
White House and encouraging people to conserve, you
can bet that he knows what's coming.
...These are just prudent suggestions. I see no
reason to panic about the situation. It will progress
quickly, but those who are looking for the signs
will know when things start to go down hill. Until
you have spent days looking for a gas station, or
gone grocery shopping when nothing was on the shelves,
or gone five days without electricity during a heat
wave, you can not appreciate the situation.
...To summarize, the GOM (Gulf
of Mexico) oil and gas industry has been hit pretty
hard. ALL oil and 80% of natural gas production is
shut in. Four refineries are seriously damaged, needing
about a month or more to repair. Dozens of rigs and
platforms are sunk, missing or damaged. There is
currently about a month's supply of refined petroleum
products in storage, and they are decreasing rapidly.
Your readers would do well to consider prudent preparations
for a severe disruption in energy by year's end.
|
The controversial leader of the
Respect Party George Galloway this week provoked a
fresh wave of condemnation after he launched a stinging
attack on Zionism and Israel during a radio interview
in America.
The MP, who this year won the Bethnal Green and
Bow Parliamentary seat in a bitter contest with Labour’s
Oona King, was denounced by community leaders and
political peers for his comments which suggested Zionists
had effectively engineered anti-semitism.
During the show, broadcast on stations across the
US and online Galloway declared that, “Israel
and dirty tricks have a long history,” denouncing
it as a “little settler state on the Mediterranean” whose
purpose was to “act as an advanced guard in the
Arab world.”
Responding to interviewer Alex Jones’ claims
that Zionists funded Hitler because “they said
he’s going be good, he’s going to persecute
Jews and he likes our plan of Palestine”, Galloway
stated, “This is the thing
about Zionism. It has nothing to do with Jewishness. Some
of the biggest Zionists in the world are not Jews….
These people have used Jewish people.”
He added: “They created the
conditions in the Arab countries and in some European
countries to stampede Jewish people out of the countries
that they had been living in for many hundreds of years
and stampede them into the Zionist state.”
Labour Liverpool Riverside MP Louise Ellman, who has
been derided by Galloway as “Israel’s MP
on Merseyside,” said: “I
think this is just another demonstration of George
Galloway’s total hostility towards Jewish national
identity and self-determination.”
Eric Moonman, President of the Zionist Federation,
added to the condemnation, accusing Galloway of “manipulating
many of the facts”.
He continued: “He has created a relatively new
bogey for him, which is the non-Jewish Zionist. I
think in short that one must never overestimate the
power of his words but we must not underestimate the
way in which he can influence groups of people who
are somewhat naive about the Middle East and Zionism. It’s
depressing that the Jewish people and friends of Zionism
are having to justify themselves and argue their corner.”
Stan Urman, Director of Justice for Jews from Arab
Countries, a group which represents the 856,000 of
Jewish refugees from Arab countries, dismissed Galloway’s
claims. He said: “How
does one explain pogroms in 1912 and 1932 well before
the establishment of the State of Israel? They were
part of an orchestrated campaign by Arab governments
to use their Jewish population as a weapon in their
struggle against the creation of the State of Israel.
His comments do not stand the test of historical fact.”
While Downing Street said it had “no intention
of validating these well-known views of George Galloway
with any comment, ” Galloway himself told the
Jewish News: “I stand
by all those comments. Everything I have said there
is fact and there are shelves full of books to prove
it. I believe that Zionism has exploited the Jewish
people as much as the Palestinian people and has turned
the people of Einstein and Epstein into one apparently
represented by Sharon and Netanyahu.” |
AN astonishing claim that M16
recruited Muslim extremists in Britain for terror training
abroad has been made by Oldham MP and former cabinet
minister Michael Meacher.
Mr Meacher also suggest that a British Muslim held
under sentenced of death in Pakistan for beheading
a US journalist is being kept alive because he was
a British double agent.
The Oldham West and Royton MP makes these sensational
claims in an article for Asian News' sister paper,
The Guardian.
The former Environment Secretary claims that Britain's
'overseas' security organisation, M16, set about recruiting
UK Muslims directing them to support US efforts to
overthrow communist governments in Afghanistan and
Yugoslavia. He highlights a Delhi-based research foundation
that estimates anything up to 200 UK Muslims could
have undergone training in overseas terrorist camps
under the protection of the Pakistani secret service,
the ISI, who were backing the armed Islamic insurrection
against the Afghan communist regime and its Soviet
backers.
He writes: "During an interview on Fox TV this
summer, the former US federal prosecutor John Loftus
reported that the British intelligence had used the
al-Muhajiroun group..to recruit Islamist militants
with British passports for the war against the Serbs
in Kosovo."
The now disbanded al-Muhajiroun group held meetings
in Manchester after 9/11 praising the courage of the
suicide bombers and claimed to be helping UK Muslims
to fight US troops in Afghanistan.
Mr Meacher also highlights the case of UK-born Muslim
Omar Saeed Sheikh, sentenced to death for the murder
of US journalist Daniel Pearl in 2002.
Mr Meacher writes that Sheikh has been allowed 32
appeals against his sentence, the last being adjourned "indefinitely".
He says the same Delhi foundation describes Sheikh
as a British agent.
Mr Meacher adds: "This is all the more remarkable
when this is the same Omar Sheikh who, at the behest
of General Mahmood Ahmed, head of the ISI, wired $100,000
to Mohammed Atta, the leading 9/11 hijacker, before
the New York attacks, as confirmed by Dennis Lomel,
director of FBI's financial crimes unit."
Mr Meacher’s argument is that the UK and US
security service do not want a proper investigation
into these links because it would expose how they encouraged
and helped to recruit Islamic 'warriors' when it suited
their purposes but that these same forces eventually
turned on the west, inflamed by what they saw as anti-Islamic
occupations and pro-Israeli international policies. |
Azahari bin Husin, said to be
the explosives “mastermind” behind the
Bali bombings this past weekend, has a very interesting
background. He is not your average rural madrassa religious
fanatic or “al-Qaeda” goat herder of the
sort captured in Afghanistan. Husin is a “former
university lecturer and gifted mathematician,” according
to the Sydney
Morning Herald. “He returned home to obtain
his degree, and at the end of the 1980s went to Reading
University in England, where he impressed his tutors
so much they persuaded him to stay on to complete a
doctorate.” Husin’s future was promising
as a lecturer at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia at Skudai
in the southern state of Johor—and then he suddenly
experienced a fanatical religious “epiphany” under
the sway of the late Abdullah Sungkar and Abu Bakar
Bashir, followers of the Darul Islam ideology and co-founders
of Pondok Ngruki and eventually Jemaah Islamiyah, an
Islamic separatist movement supposedly dedicated to
the establishment of a fundamentalist Islamic state
in Southeast Asia.
I say “supposedly” because there are
doubts (never mentioned in the western corporate
media) about the legitimacy of Jemaah Islamiyah,
as I noted in an earlier blog entry (subsequently
posted on the Muslim
Public Affairs Committee website).
According to Sayed
Abdullah, who operates an intelligence services
firm in Indonesia, “It is clear that the
CIA and the Mossad have infiltrated such organizations
[Jemaah Islamiyah, Hamas, and Hezbollah].” Abdullah
told Kazi Mahmood of IslamOnline the he believe
it “is obvious the CIA and the Mossad,
assisted by the Australian Special Action Police
(SAP) and the M15 of England, are all working
towards undermining Muslim organizations in an
attempt to weaken the Muslims globally.”
Abdullah believes the Bali bombing of 2002 was “an
operation clearly financed and assisted by the CIA
and Mossad, made use of Muslims to carry out the final
act…. Those Muslims were not innocent since
they took the bait handed over by the CIA and the Mossad
to bomb Bali and to avenge against the U.S. war on
the Muslims in Afghanistan.”
The Indonesian expert argued said that “to
achieve this, the CIA used one of its operatives,
Omar Al-Faruq, an Arab living in the U.S. who speaks
Arabic and knows a little about Islam and who was
sent to Indonesia to infiltrate the so called terrorist
groups.
He said that Al-Faruq initially infiltrated the
Laskar Jihad, a group of Muslim volunteers fighting
for the safeguard of the Maluku’s during the
conflict of the Island.
When the Laskar was winded down by its leader, Al-Faruq
was sent to join the Mujahideen Council of Indonesia
(MMI), created and headed by jailed Indonesian Islamic
leader Abu Bakar Basyir, added Sayed Abdullah.
“After he failed to be a member of the MMI
and failed to get to Basyir, he decided to work on
the followers of Basyir. It is then that he came
into contact with some of the Bali bombers and this
is how the whole Bali operation was conducted,” according
to the Indonesian intelligence expert.
He claimed that Australia, the U.S. and even Taiwan
knew that Bali was to be bombed but they did nothing
about it.
As noted in yesterday’s entry here, Omar Al-Faruq “was
assigned to infiltrate Islamic radical groups and recruit
local agents within these groups” for the CIA. “After
the CIA obtained complete data on this matter, they
then made Al-Faruq disappear. It’s common in
intelligence world,” former Indonesian State
Intelligence Coordinating Board chief A.C.
Manulang told Tempo Interactive in September, 2002.
Azahari bin Husin’s British connection should
be examined, especially in light of the revelations
that Haroon Rashid Aswat, the so-called mastermind
of the 7/7 London Bombings, worked for British Intelligence,
as noted by former Justice Department prosecutor and
terror expert John Loftus on, of all places, Fox News. Steve
Watson wrote for Infowars on August 2:
John Loftus went on to spell out that British
Intelligence and the US dept of Justice had protected
Haroon Rashid Aswat: “Back in 1999 he came
to America. The Justice Department wanted to indict
him in Seattle because him and his buddy were trying
to set up a terrorist training school in Oregon… we’ve
just learned that the headquarters of the US Justice
Department ordered the Seattle prosecutors not
to touch Aswat… apparently Aswat was working
for British intelligence…”
This information is startling and again highlights
how Al Qaeda exists as an organized body only where
the intelligence services have created, funded and
employed it. Loftus points out that several weeks
before the London Bombings, Aswat was again located
by the South African Intel agency but again allowed
to slip away, this time to London:
“He was a British intelligence plant. So all
of a sudden he disappears. He’s in South Africa.
We think he’s dead; we don’t know he’s
down there. Last month the South African Secret Service
come across the guy. He’s alive… the
Brits know that the CIA wants to get a hold of Haroon.
So what happens? He takes off again, goes right to
London. He isn’t arrested when he lands, he
isn’t arrested when he leaves… He’s
on the watch list. The only reason he could get away
with that was if he was working for British intelligence.
He was a wanted man.”
In similar fashion, Azahari bin Husin managed to elude
capture in late 2003. Indonesian security officials “say
Indonesian police were close to catching him in late
2003 in a swoop on Pekanbaru, capital of Sumatra’s
Riau province, and opposite Singapore,” explains
the Sydney Morning Herald. “Azahari was there,
but slipped through the dragnet unrecognized.” He
was able to do this because he is “[l]ong-haired
and lean-faced” and bears “little resemblance
to the one photograph police have of him.” Obviously,
Husin shares the same mercurial nature as Osama bin
Laden and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
It would seem the Brits and the United States have
greasy fingers when it comes to capturing potentially
dangerous Islamic fanatics and al-Qaeda operatives.
In fact, they are simply recycling trusted intel operatives
(or their painstakingly engineered reputations).
Of course, considering “al-Qaeda” (appropriately
earning the moniker “al-CIA-duh”) is a
documented CIA-ISI-MI6 asset, the “escape” of
key “terrorists” such as Azahari bin Husin
is not only logical, it is mandatory if state-sponsored
terrorism is to be used as a form of psychological
warfare against unwitting populations in need of manipulation
(since most normal people recoil from the prospect
of forever war and need to be reminded of the specter
of terrorism). Since we have no evidence Bin Husin
actually exists—he was last seen prior to the
first Bali bombing—the corporate media, regurgitating
spook generated mythologies, is now free to turn the
former mathematician and university lecturer into a
world-class terrorist on par with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
Like Orwell’s Emmanuel Goldstein, Azahari bin
Husin lives on as an effective bogeyman, an effective
(if illusive) villain in a constellation of Islamic
villains, an evasive apparition one step ahead of the
law and thus forever a possible threat—or at
least a threat until our rulers decide they no longer
have use for him (as they apparently no longer have
use for Osama bin Laden now that nine eleven is established
folklore and the irrefutable foundation of the supposed
war on terrorism). |
WASHINGTON - The administration
of President George W. Bush broke the law as it resorted
to illegal "covert propaganda" in trying
to sell its key education initiative to the public,
US congressional investigators have found.
The finding, made public by the Government Accountability
Office on Friday, added to a plethora of big and
small ethics scandals besetting the administration
and its top Republican allies and putting them on
the defensive one year before congressional elections.
The investigation was ordered by Democratic Senators
Edward Kennedy and Frank Lautenberg earlier this year,
in the wake of reports the Education Department had
paid newspaper columnist and television commentator
Armstrong Williams thousands of dollars to help promote
the No Child Left Behind Law.
The 2002 bipartisan measure established new testing
requirements for public schools designed to ensure
that students achieve an acceptable level of proficiency
in reading and mathematics.
But the law came in for strong criticism from local
officials and teachers' unions, who argued it did not
provide sufficient funds to implement the reforms.
Under the deal, Williams produced
a series of radio and television shows as well as
wrote newspaper columns under his own name highlighting
what he saw as the benefits of the law.
But in doing so, he failed to disclose
the government paid him for these activities 186,000
dollars (150,000 euros) through Ketchum Inc., a public
relations firm, according to the GAO report.
"This qualifies as the production or distribution
of covert propaganda," said the investigative
arm of Congress. "In our view, the department
violated the publicity or propaganda prohibition when
it issued task orders... without requiring Ketchum
to ensure that Mr Williams disclosed to his audiences
his relationship with the department."
Newspaper syndicate Tribune Media Services canceled
Williams' column in January.
In addition, the department placed with the firm
a total of 21 orders for producing unattributed videos
showcasing the education initiative that were made
to look like normal television reports and were slated
for distribution to TV networks as bona fide news stories.
There is no word if any of these clips actually made
it to the air.
Congressional investigators pointed out that under
US law, "an agency must inform the viewing public
that the government is the source of the information
disseminated."
The report also suggested the administration
may have illegally shifted nearly 38,500 dollars within
its budget to pay for its propaganda campaign.
In statements that followed the GAO report, Senator
Kennedy and Lautenberg demanded the misused money be
returned to the government.
"The taxpayer funded propaganda coming from
the White House is another sign of the culture of corruption
that pervades the White House and Republican leadership," argued
Kennedy.
The finding comes as the Republican
establishment in Washington finds itself embroiled
in a series of scandals ranging from the indictment
of House majority leader Tom DeLay on charges related
to his fundraising activities to allegations of preferential
treatment of contractors helping victims of Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita.
Senate Republican Majority Leader Bill Frist is facing
an investigation into a questionable stock sale, while the
probe into the illegal disclosure of the name of CIA
operative Valerie Plame took a new twist Friday, after
it was revealed that Lewis "Scooter" Libby,
Vice President Richard Cheney's chief of staff, was
one of the sources of information about her.
Plame's name was leaked to the press in 2003 after
her husband publicly disputed Bush's claim that Iraq
sought to buy uranium ore from Niger as part of its
drive to build nuclear weapons. |
Choking
back tears, COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF star Donald Sutherland
warned this week: President Bush "will destroy
our lives!"
The star of the new ABC drama, which follows the first
woman President of the United States, lashed out at the
real White House during a dramatic sit down interview
with the BBC.
Sutherland ripped Bush and his administration for the
war and Hurricane Katrina fallout.
"They were inept. The were inadequate to the task,
and they lied," Sutherland charged.
"And they were insulting, and they were vindictive.
And they were heartless. They did not care. They do not
care. They do not care about Iraqi people. They do not
care about the families of dead soldiers. They only care
about profit."
At one point during the session, Sutherland
started crying: "We stolen our children's future... We
have children. We have children. How dare we take their legacy
from them. How dare we. It's shameful. What we are doing to
our world."
Sutherland went on rip Karl Rove's "methods and
means" against people like Cindy Sheehan.
"We're back to burning books in
Germany," Sutherland said of NBC's editing out of Kanye
West's comment on Bush during a hurricane relief telethon. |
Relief efforts to combat Hurricane
Katrina suffered near catastrophic failures due to
endemic corruption, divisions within the military and
troop shortages caused by the Iraq war, an official
American inquiry into the disaster has revealed.
The confidential report, which has been seen by
The Independent, details how funds for flood control
were diverted to other projects, desperately needed
National Guards were stuck in Iraq and how military
personnel had to "sneak off post" to help
with relief efforts because their commander had refused
permission.
The shortcomings in dealing with Katrina have rocked
George Bush's administration. Michael Brown, director
of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, has resigned
from his post and polls show that a majority of Americans
feel the President showed inadequate leadership.
The report was commissioned by the
Office of Secretary of Defence as an "independent
and critical review" of what went so wrong. In
a hard-hitting analysis, it says: "The US military
has long planned for war on two fronts. This is as
close as we have come to [that] reality since the Second
World War; the results have been disastrous."
The document was compiled by Stephen Henthorne, a
former professor of the US Army's War College and an
adviser to the Pentagon who was a deputy-director in
the Louisiana relief efforts.
It charts how "corruption
and mismanagement within the New Orleans city government" had "diverted
money earmarked for improving flood protection to
other, more vote-getting, projects. Past mayors and
governors gambled that the long-expected Big Killer
hurricane would never happen. That bet was lost with
Hurricane Katrina."
The report concludes that although the US military
did a good job in carrying out emergency missions,
there were some serious shortcomings.
The report states that Brigadier General Michael D
Barbero, commander of the Joint Readiness Training
Centre at Fort Polk, Louisiana, refused permission
for special forces units who volunteered to join relief
efforts, to do so. General Barbero also refused to
release other troops.
"The same general did take in some families from
Hurricane Katrina, but only military families living
off the base," the report says. "He has done
a similar thing for military families displaced by
Hurricane Rita. However, he declined to share water
with the citizens of Leesville, who are out of water,
and his civil affairs staff have to sneak off post
in civilian clothes to help coordinate relief efforts." The
report says deployment in the Iraq war led to serious
problems. "Another major
factor in the delayed response to the hurricane aftermath
was that the bulk of the Louisiana and Mississippi
National Guard was deployed in Iraq."
"Even though all the states have 'compacts' with
each other, pledging to come to the aid of other states,
it takes time, money and effort to activate and deploy
National Guard troops from other states to fill in".
Mr Henthorne's report states: "The President
has indicated several times that he wants the US military
to take a more active role in disaster management and
humanitarian assistance."
"There are several reasons why that will not
happen easily. (1) Existing laws will not allow the
police powers the military will need to be effective.
(2) The military is not trained for such a mission
and (3) the 'warfighter insurgency' within the US military
does not want such a mission and will strongly resist
it. Not one civil affairs unit was deployed for either
hurricane."
The report concludes: "The
one thing this disaster has demonstrated [is] the
lack of coordinated, in-depth planning and training
on all levels of Government, for any/all types of
emergency contingencies. 9/11 was an exception because
the geographical area was small and contained, but
these two hurricanes have clearly demonstrated a
national response weakness ... Failure to plan, and
train properly has plagued US efforts in Afghanistan,
Iraq and now that failure has come home to roost
in the United States." |
The nation's energy chief says
it will take six months for U.S. energy production
and prices to return to pre-hurricane levels, and he
hints at energy shortages in the interim.
That's the most blunt and pessimistic estimate yet
of how long the energy disruptions caused by hurricanes
Katrina and Rita will affect the USA. But it could
help Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman sell Americans
on a conservation campaign he plans to detail Monday.
"How long before we return to normal? It's hard
to know, because we have not yet got an assessment" of
damage from Rita, Bodman said in an interview with
USA TODAY on Friday. He said it will be two to three
weeks before the assessment is done.
"We're going to go through
a very challenging time the next six months, is my
guess," Bodman said. "Most of us
have viewed energy availability as a kind of right
of citizenship," he said, and might have to
rethink that as refineries are restarted, pipelines
repaired and natural gas processing resumed. "Both
in terms of gasoline availability and (prices of)
natural gas and heating oil, we're going to have
some problems."
Hurricane Katrina swept the Gulf of Mexico and hit
shore near New Orleans on Aug. 29. Rita followed Sept.
24, hitting the Texas coast west of Katrina's landfall.
The two storms temporarily closed all Gulf oil operations
and most natural gas operations, according to the U.S.
Minerals Management Service.
Only 2% of Gulf oil production had
resumed by the weekend, MMS reported, and 21% of natural
gas production. The Gulf supplies 29% of U.S.-produced
oil and 19% of U.S.-sourced natural gas.
The nationwide average for unleaded regular gasoline
is $2.92, AAA said Sunday. That's up about 30 cents
from before Katrina hit.
Gasoline supplies are being supplemented by increased
shipments from overseas. But
natural gas, the heating fuel for most Americans, can't
easily be shipped. Industry and government forecasts
say that tight gas supplies could result in heating
bills nearly doubling.
Keeping prices down "could be challenging if
we get exceptionally cold weather," warns Paula
Reynolds, CEO of big gas supplier AGL Resources. That
could use up the cheaper gas that utilities have in
storage and require them to replace it with today's
high-price natural gas, passing the increase to users.
The government conservation plan will
ask Americans to turn off lights, change thermostat
settings, drive slower, insulate homes and take other
steps. |
WASHINGTON - US President George
W. Bush nominated White House counsel and longtime
loyalist Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court, a move
that may shape legal battles on divisive issues like
abortion for decades.
If confirmed by the US Senate, she would replace
retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the first woman
to serve on the nine-seat high court and often a
critical swing vote on volatile matters that divide
Americans.
Miers "has devoted her life to the rule of law
and the cause of justice. She will be an outstanding
addition to Supreme Court of the United States," the
president said with her at his side in the Oval Office
of the White House.
The court wields enormous influence over American
life as the final arbiter of the US Constitution and
ultimate court of appeal, and has ruled on issues like
abortion, the death penalty, and same-sex marriage.
Justices are named for life but can step down.
The nomination came as Bush grappled with some of
the poorest approval ratings of his presidency, battered
by soaring gas prices, the war in Iraq, and the widely
criticized response to killer Hurricane Katrina.
Miers, 60, has never served
as a judge, but has been a close aide to Bush ever
since he was governor of Texas. She would
join Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as the second woman
on the court and third in its history.
"If confirmed, I recognize that I will have
a tremendous responsibility to keep our judicial system
strong and to help ensure that the courts meet their
obligations to strictly apply the laws and the Constitution," she
said.
Her nomination came as newly confirmed US Chief Justice
John Roberts, Bush's pick to replace the late William
Rehnquist, formally took up his duties as the high
court opened a new session. [...]
"I believe the senators of both parties will
find that Harriet Miers' talent, experience and judicial
philosophy make her a superb choice to safeguard the
constitutional liberties and equality of all Americans," he
said.
"I ask the Senate to review her qualifications
thoroughly and fairly and to vote on her nomination
promptly," said the president.
Bush paid special tribute to Miers's groundbreaking
roles as the first woman hired at one of the top law
firms in Dallas, Texas; the first woman to become president
of that firm, and the first woman to be elected president
of the Dallas Bar Association.
As a high-powered trial lawyer,
Miers represented such firms as Microsoft and Walt
Disney.
The largest abortion rights group in the United States,
the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA),
immediately expressed concern about the nomination
and she must be clear about her position on abortion. |
PARIS, Oct 2 (AFP) - Widespread
disruption to business and travel is expected in France
on Tuesday, as left-wing parties join trade unions
in a call for strikes and protest marches against the
government of President Jacques Chirac.
Hundreds of thousands are predicted
at some 140 demonstrations across the country, as
protesters demand pay increases, investment in public
services, an end to privatisations, and the withdrawal
of a new jobs contract that makes it easier for employers
to hire and fire.
In Paris, where the biggest march is planned during
the afternoon, only around half of metro and bus services
will be running as normal, and a third of suburban
commuter trains, the state-owned transport companies
RATP and SNCF said.
Some 60 percent of TGV fast trains will be operating
across the country, and a lower proportion of local
trains. However international Eurostar and Thalys train
services to London and Brussels will not be affected.
Some disturbances are also expected to air travel,
especially on short-haul flights. Air France said long
distance routes should operate as per schedule. Many
motorways will be free of charge as toll staff stay
away.
Widespread work stoppages are likely in the public
sector, notably in national and local government, schools
and post offices, but unions said many private businesses
will also be hit as staff give vent to growing concerns
over job security and the cost of living.
The five union federations that called
the day of action were boosted by an opinion poll in
L'Humanité newspaper -- which is close to the
Communist party -- showing that 74 percent of the public
have sympathy with their cause.
Another survey in Le Journal du Dimanche newspaper
indicated that 57 percent have "confidence" in
the union movement -- an increase of eight points from
early last year.
The protests also received backing in a rare show
of unity from the main parties of the left and far-left,
which said in a statement that action was necessary "to
break with the reactionary and ultra-liberal logic
of the government".
The Socialist, Communist, Green and Communist Revolutionary
League parties demanded the abrogation of a new jobs
contract -- introduced recently by decree by Prime
Minister Dominique de Villepin -- as well as "measures
to stop large scale redundancies and corporate relocalisations,
and an end to bargain basement sell-offs of state companies."
The protests come at a sensitive time for de Villepin,
who has been rocked onto the back foot by a crisis
over the privatisation of the state-owned SNCM ferry
company which serves Corsica and north Africa from
ports on the Mediterranean coast.
Plans to sell off the heavily-indebted concern sparked
days of violence in Corsica, a near-blockade of the
island, and the shut-down of the country's largest
port of Marseille. Though action was taken this weekend
to re-open communications, the situation remains highly
volatile. |
A deadly bacteria listed among
bioterrorism agents was detected in the US capital
last month during a mass protest against the Iraq war,
a top health official said.
District of Columbia Health Director Doctor Gregg
Pane told WTOP Radio late Saturday that biological
agent monitors on the National Mall, an esplanade
in downtown Washington, gave positive readings for
a small amount of tularemia on September 24 and 25.
The sensors are operated by the Department of Homeland
Security, but officials were not notified of the potential
hazard until Friday, according to Pane.
"We've stepped up our surveillance and have notified
doctors in the area about what to look for," Pane
told the radio station.
He urged people who were at the Mall last weekend
and who have been experiencing symptoms of pneumonia
to immediately seek medical help, but added that there
was no evidence that anyone had been affected by the
bacteria.
First Lady Laura Bush was among those visiting the
affected area at the time.
Tularemia, which is caused by the bacterium francisella
tularensis, can occur naturally and is usually found
in animals, especially rodents, rabbits and hares,
according to federal health officials.
Symptoms include sudden fever, headaches, diarrhea,
joint pain, cough and progressive weakness.
But the disease can be fatal if it is not treated
with the right antibiotics, officials said.
Bacteria casing tularemia was very infectious, with
between 10 and 50 micro-organisms usually enough to
bring down an adult.
Although francisella tularensis could be isolated
and grown in a laboratory, manufacturing an effective
aerosol weapon would require considerable sophistication.
The Washington Post reported Sunday that national
security officials believe the bacteria was probably
not intentionally spread.
"There is no known nexus to terror or criminal
behavior. We believe this to be environmental," the
paper quoted Russ Knocke, spokesman for the Department
of Homeland Security, as saying.
But federal health officials remain on alert for outbreaks
of the disease far away from Washington because of
the numbers of visitors to the capital last weekend.
Thousands of opponents of the war in Iraq from all
around the country converged on the National Mall on
September 24.
Organizers put the number of participants at more
than 300,000, while police said, unofficially, the
protesters probably numbered a little over 100,000.
The same day the Mall hosted the 2005 National Book
Festival, a massive book signing extravaganza which
was hosted by First Lady Bush. |
DUBAI - Bird flu has broken the transmission
barrier and jumped from human to human, according to
the World Health Organisation.
Most cases have been bird to human but transmission
between people increases fears of a global pandemic.
The acknowledgement came on a day when the organisation
had to backtrack on the number of potential deaths
forecast from a bird flu pandemic created by widespread
human-to-human infection.
Dr David Nabarro said on Thursday, less than one
day into his new role as the UN coordinator for global
readiness against an outbreak, that measures taken
by the world today would determine whether bird flu
ended up killing five million or as many as 150 million
people.
The figure of 150 million deaths was quickly played
down by the WHO yesterday.
"There is obvious confusion,
and I think that has to be straightened out. I don't
think you will hear Dr Nabarro say the same sort of
thing again," WHO influenza spokesman Dick Thompson
told a news briefing.
The UN health agency said it has warned countries
to prepare for a death toll of up to 7.4 million.
The 1918-19 'Spanish flu' outbreak, the most lethal
flu pandemic so far recorded, claimed 50 million lives,
far more than the 15 million killed in the First World
War.
But the flu has jumped the barrier of human-to-human
transmission.
"There have been four, maybe
five cases of humans getting it from other humans," Thompson
told Gulf News from the organisation's Geneva headquarters.
"All of these have been in Asia. But it is important
to note that it was not passed on to more humans. The
chain ended at those four or five who caught it."
The world has coped with pandemics before, Thompson
said.
Seasonal flu normally kills up to 500,000 in any year. |
Israelis preparing to see out
the old year and welcome in the new with the sound
of shofar blowing Monday felt their country shaking
as a 4.3 scale earthquake struck the region.
Originating just after 7 AM near the northern Jordan
Valley town of Bet She'an, the quake shook beds and
buildings, momentarily frightening people before
subsiding as quickly as it had begun.
According to the Geophysical Institute of Israel,
the tremor was felt in Nahariya, Haifa, Tel Aviv and
Rehovot. People in Jerusalem told Jerusalem Newswire they
had felt the quake too.
No injuries or damages were reported.
Israel’s location alongside the massive Syrian-African
rift means the country frequently experiences earthquakes
as two tectonic plates rub against one another. |
TAIPEI, Taiwan -- As typhoon Longwang approached
Taiwan, a moderate earthquake shook the island, prompting
some residents to flee their homes.
Nature's double-whammy left 36 people injured from
the storm, according to local media reports, but no
one was reported hurt by the quake, a magnitude 5.4
-- capable of moderate damage.
Longwang made landfall on Taiwan's eastern coast Sunday
at 5:50 a.m. (5:50 p.m. ET Saturday) with wind gusts
over 125 mph (201 kph) and heavy rains. Sustained winds
were clocked at about 83 mph. Longwang means dragon
king in Chinese.
The storm forced officials to shut down public transportation,
and it was expected to strengthen and possibly make
landfall a second time in mainland China after crossing
the Taiwan Strait.
Forecasters said up to 16 inches of rain had fallen
along the northern and central portions of the eastern
coast, especially in mountainous areas.
Some 187,909 homes were without power, the fire administration
told Reuters.
Before landfall, Longwang was a supertyphoon with
wind gusts over 150 mph.
Hurricanes are defined as typhoons when they develop
west of the international date line, an imaginary time-zone
border drawn north and south through the Pacific Ocean,
largely along the 180th meridian. |
MEXICO CITY, Oct. 1 (Xinhuanet)
-- The Santa Ana volcano, El Salvador's largest, erupted
on Saturday after being dormant for more than a century,
leaving at least two dead people and forcing more than
2,000 others to flee home.
The volcano, also known as the Ilamatepec volcano,
located 66 kilometers west of San Salvador, the capital
of El Salvador, started on Saturday morning to belch
out thick plumes of ashes, which reached more than
15 kilometers into the sky.
Soon after the volcano began casting hot rocks and
ash from itscrater,military emergency sirens blasted
to signal an immediate area evacuation of the hamlets
in the coffee growing area, where some 20,000 people
live.
Salvador's Interior Minister Rene Figueroa said that
two peoplewere killed as 200 residents fled the hamlet
of Palo Campana, which lies just two kilometers from
the crater.
The police said that at least seven people were injured
by red hot rocks hurled into the air by the eruption.
Officials with the National Emergency Committee said
2,250 people had been evacuated from the danger zone
by 1 p.m. local time (1900 GMT).
A red alert had been declared in a four kilometer
(2.5 mile) radius around the volcano while a lesser "yellow
alert" was issuedfor nearby areas.
The volcano, which is 2,381 meters above sea level,
last eruptedin 1904. |
GRANTVILLE, Kan. - A storm dumped
up to a foot of rain over parts of northeast Kansas
on Sunday, sparking flash flooding that left people
stranded in homes and cars, emergency officials said.
No serious injuries were reported, but emergency
crews used airboats to navigate fast-moving floodwaters
that damaged many homes.
About a foot of rain fell overnight in Jefferson County,
and up to 10 inches was reported in Jackson County.
Gov. Kathleen Sebelius declared an emergency in four
counties.
"The water in the creeks came up, and the homes
are surrounded," said Don Haynes, Jefferson County's
director of emergency services. "Who plans for
this kind of rain?"
Emergency officials did not have an estimate of how
many people had been rescued, but reports from several
officials indicated there were at least two dozen.
A voluntary evacuation order was issued for Rossville,
a town of 1,070 people in Shawnee county. Shelters
were being opened.
One of the rescued was Dennis Stanwix, 49, of Grantville.
An airboat picked up Stanwix, his wife, daughter and
daughter's friend Sunday morning. He said he was awakened
by his phone and when he looked out the window saw
nothing but water.
"I knew we were in big trouble," he said.
Ann and Will Roberts were sleeping in their small
house in Grantville when their 6-year-old daughter,
Danni, awoke them Sunday morning.
"The picnic table is floating," Ann Roberts
recalled the girl saying.
A nursing home in Leavenworth County was evacuated,
and the Kansas Highway Patrol rescued a man off his
car on a highway, Moser said. A mobile home also was
reported to have washed away in Jackson County, but
the home's resident escaped safely.
The rains closed nearly all roads in Jefferson County,
with as much as 3 feet of water reported on Kansas
24. But it was receding under sunny skies by noon,
said Gayle Bickel, chief of Township Fire District
No. 1. |
On the fourth
anniversary of the September 11th attacks, Laura Knight-Jadczyk
announces the availability of her latest book:
In the years since the 9/11 attacks, dozens of books
have sought to explore the truth behind the official
version of events that day - yet to date, none of
these publications has provided a satisfactory answer
as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately
responsible for carrying them out.
Taking a broad, millennia-long perspective, Laura
Knight-Jadczyk's 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth uncovers the true nature of
the ruling elite on our planet and presents new and
ground-breaking insights into just how the 9/11 attacks
played out.
9/11: The Ultimate
Truth makes a strong case for the idea that September
11, 2001 marked the moment when our planet entered
the final phase of a diabolical plan that has been
many, many years in the making. It is a plan developed
and nurtured by successive generations of ruthless
individuals who relentlessly exploit the negative
aspects of basic human nature to entrap humanity as
a whole in endless wars and suffering in order to
keep us confused and distracted to the reality of
the man behind the curtain.
Drawing on historical and genealogical sources, Knight-Jadczyk
eloquently links the 9/11 event to the modern-day
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. She also cites the clear
evidence that our planet undergoes periodic natural
cataclysms, a cycle that has arguably brought humanity
to the brink of destruction in the present day.
For its no nonsense style in cutting to the core
of the issue and its sheer audacity in refusing to
be swayed or distracted by the morass of disinformation
that has been employed by the Powers that Be to cover
their tracks, 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth can rightly claim to be THE
definitive book on 9/11 - and what that fateful day's
true implications are for the future of mankind.
Published by Red Pill Press
Scheduled for release in October
2005, readers can pre-order the book today at our bookstore. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|