|
"You get America out of Iraq and
Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism."
- Cindy Sheehan
|
P I C T U R E
O F T H E D A Y
Copyright
2005 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
Foooosh!
That's how fast witnesses said a glowing meteor
streaked across Florida skies Thursday before disappearing.
From Fort Lauderdale to Cape Canaveral people called
the National Weather Service reporting the bright
orange orb.
"We think it was a meteor that was falling
through the sky and burning up," said Barry
Baxter, a weather service meteorologist.
"We don't know if it was over the ocean or
land. [People] just said it was over the sky, like
a fireball ... with a smoke tail behind it."
That's how Bob Cooper, 48, of Dania Beach, described
it, a flaming ball without the smoke tail. He was
in the back yard throwing a Frisbee to Bill, his
golden retriever, when something caught his attention.
"All of a sudden this thing shot from my right," said
Cooper, describing the "thing" about the
size of a baseball. "And it was super fast,
so you know it was in a hurry."
A 911 caller reported a plane crash about 7 p.m.
at the old Harris Ranch on Southeast River Lane,
Martin County officials said. But air traffic controllers
at Miami International Airport told Martin County
authorities it was a meteor.
It was unclear what direction the glowing glob traveled
or the size. Baxter said NASA would determine both.
"If it was determined by NASA not to be a piece
of re-entering space debris, then it was most likely
a sporadic fireball," said Jack Horkheimer,
planetarium director at the Miami Museum of Science.
"It has all the determiners of a fireball."
Fireballs are extremely bright meteors about the
size of a baseball or basketball that slam into the
earth's atmosphere at high speeds, he said.
They are common, but often go unreported because
most of the planet is uninhabited; water covers 70
percent.
"They are nothing to worry about -- a wonderful
phenomenon of nature," Horkheimer said. |
"I'd be willing to bet that
if you had the weather maps of the Atlantic Ocean on
those days, you'd find no wave-generating storm off Africa," wrote
Gene Floersch of Melbourne Beach. He was referring to
a suggested cause of the mysterious huge waves we've
been writing about.
They suddenly invaded the beach
north of Fort Lauderdale on a clear, sunny, wind-free
day in early March 1962 and frightened onlookers. One,
Mary Swanson, now an Indialantic resident, said she'd
moved to Arizona soon after the event and never knew
what caused it.
She hoped our readers could tell
her. We've been reporting their responses, which mostly
blame the waves on far-off storms, as distant as Africa.
"Any storm powerful enough to send waves clear
across the Atlantic would have affected the whole Florida
coastline . . . and would also have first devastated
the Bahama Islands," Gene said.
However, he added, "there
was a more recent incident of 'mystery waves' that
did hit Daytona Beach on an evening when the sea was
flat, swamping beach-parked cars and scaring a lot
of tourists at the boardwalk. Officials claimed these
waves were generated by a 'sand slide' out on the continental
shelf, but there was no geological activity registered
by seismic sensors along the east coast.
"Some weeks later a local
news channel ran a report about the operators of
a shrimp boat off the coast witnessing a huge splash
in the distance and then almost being swamped by
massive swells.
"I believe the waves
in both cases were caused by meteor impacts at sea.
I also believe that safety officials play down these
incidents, feeding the public any excuse but the
truth.
"Why? Because we have no defense or warning
systems to deal with meteor impacts. Our government
justifies spending billions of tax dollars on missile
defense systems, and yet a missile attack is less of
a threat than the debris flying around in local space.
The reality is that even if an imminent impact were
predicted, there is nothing we could do about it." |
A top UN
public health expert warned yesterday that a new
flu pandemic is expected at any time and could kill
anywhere between five million and 150 million people – depending
on action taken now to control the bird flu epidemic
sweeping through Asia.
Dr David Nabarro of the World Health Organisation called
on governments to take immediate steps to address the
threat at a news conference following his appointment
as the new UN co-ordinator for avian and human influenza.
“We expect the next influenza pandemic to come at any
time now, and it’s likely to be caused by a mutant
of the virus that is currently causing bird flu in Asia,” he
said.
The H5N1 strain of bird flu has swept through poultry
populations in Asia since 2003, infecting humans and
killing at least 65 people, mostly poultry workers, and
resulting in the deaths of tens of millions of birds.
The virus does not pass from person to person easily
but experts believe this could change if the virus mutates.
Nabarro said with the almost certainty of another flu
pandemic soon, and experts saying there is a high likelihood
of the H5N1 virus mutating, it would be “extremely
wrong” to ignore the serious possibility of a global
outbreak.
“The avian flu epidemic has to be controlled if
we are to prevent a human influenza pandemic,” Nabarro
said.
The 1918 flu pandemic killed more than 40 million people,
and there were subsequent pandemics in 1957 and 1968
which had lower death rates but caused great disruption,
he said. [...] |
The US is protecting
the "Osama bin Laden of Latin America", the
Venezuelan president said today.
Hugo Chavez made his remarks after a US judge ruled
against deporting a Cuban militant who blew up a
passenger jet in 1976.
Luis Posada Carriles - who is wanted
in Venezuela for the bombing - this week told an extradition
hearing that he faced torture if he was returned to
the country.
An immigration judge in El Paso, Texas, upheld the
claims, ruling that 77-year-old Mr Carriles could not
be extradited.
Mr Chavez said the decision not to
extradite Mr Carriles allowed the Bush administration
to protect one of Latin America's most notorious terrorists.
"The United States is protecting
the Osama bin Laden of Latin America," he said,
accusing the US president, George Bush, of "double
standards" in the fight against terror.
Earlier this month, Mr Bush told a
UN summit that "terrorists must know that, wherever
they go, they cannot escape justice".
Mr Carriles, a Cuban who also holds Venezuelan citizenship,
is accused of masterminding the bombing of the Cuban
passenger jet in 1976. He has denied any involvement
in the attack, but has admitted to working against
the Cuban president, Fidel Castro.
All 73 people on board the Cubana Airlines plane were
killed when it exploded after takeoff from Barbados.
Mr Carriles escaped from a Venezuelan
prison in 1985 while awaiting retrial after a military
court acquitted him of the bombing. He has worked as
CIA operative, and was in the US military for a year
during the early 80s.
In May, he was arrested in Miami for being in the
US illegally. The Venezuelan authorities then asked
for his extradition to stand trial for the bombing.
Mr Carriles says he could not return to Venezuela
because he would be tortured, and also alleges that
Mr Castro attempted to have him assassinated in 1990
because of his former position in the Venezuelan security
forces.
Venezuela has always denied that Mr Carriles would
be tortured if he was returned. The country's constitution
prohibits torture, and Venezuelan officials insist
his rights would be respected. |
An imam slated
to be sworn in Friday as the second Muslim chaplain
in Fire Department history said he questioned whether
19 hijackers were responsible for the Sept. 11 terror
attacks, and suggested a broader conspiracy may have
brought down the Twin Towers and killed more than 2,700
people.
In a telephone interview Thursday, Imam Intikab
Habib, 30, a native of Guyana who studied Islam in
Saudi Arabia, said he doubted the United States government's
official story blaming 19 hijackers associated with
al-Quaida and Osama bin Laden.
"I as an individual don't know who did the attacks," said
Habib, 30, a soft-spoken man who immigrated to New
York in July 2000 after spending six years in Saudi
Arabia getting a degree in Islamic theology and law. "There
are so many conflicting reports about it. I don't believe
it was 19 ... hijackers who did those attacks."
Asked to elaborate on his reasons for doubting that
story, he talked about video and news reports widely
disseminated in the Muslim community.
"I've heard professionals say
that nowhere ever in history did a steel building come
down with fire alone," he said. "It takes
two or three weeks to demolish a building like that.
But it was pulled down in a couple of hours. Was it
19 hijackers who brought it down, or was it a conspiracy?"
Questioned about who he believed was responsible for
the attacks, Habib said he didn't know. He said, however,
that he did not expect to raise his doubts with rank-and-file
firefighters -- nor did he share them two weeks ago
when he participated in several Sept. 11 memorials
on behalf of the Fire Department.
"My position as a chaplain is that whoever did
it, it's a tragic incident," he said. "I
feel sorrow for the families who lost loved ones and
for the firefighters who died in it. Whoever did it,
it was a very wrong thing. It's always wrong to take
an innocent human life."
A spokesman for the Fire Department, Frank Gribbon,
said that Habib was recommended by the department's
Islamic Society and was hired "based on his credentials
as a religious person. We don't ask new employees about
their political views before we hire them."
Stephen Cassidy, president of the Uniformed Firefighters
Association, could not be reached for comment.
Habib's remarks about the attacks came in response
to questions about whether he thought firefighters
would accept a chaplain who had been educated in Saudi
Arabia.
He said he did not expect that to be an issue because "I
come from a country where you're accustomed to living
with people of different ethnic, religious and racial
backgrounds."
When pressed further about whether the hijackers'
backgrounds -- 15 of whom were Saudi -- might make
his training an issue for still-grieving firefighters,
he went on to express his own doubts about the hijacker
story.
Habib was one of several imams recommended for the
chaplain's job by the Islamic Society for the Fire
Department, as a result of his work teaching junior
high students at Al-Ihsan Academy in Ozone Park, a
private Islamic school, where he worked for about five
years.
"He's a good man," said
Hakim Braxton, president of the Islamic Society. "Any
statements he's made, he's responsible for ... But
I would ask that the citizens of this city give him
a chance and judge him on his actions."
Braxton also stressed that neither
he nor anyone in the Islamic Society would agree with
anyone who tried to justify the terror attack in any
way. "I lost friends, family, co-workers," he
said.
Braxton described Habib as a "humble,
grounded and family man, which is a good thing in this
job, because he's trying to help everyone and he's
representing a very diverse community."
Habib himself said he saw his role as ministering
to every member of the Fire Department, not just to
Muslims.
"Being a chaplain in the Fire Department, I serve
the whole Fire Department," he said. |
Most people -- or certainly many
people, especially in the U.S. -- believe the complete
structural failure and total collapse of the World
Trade Center towers was caused by the combustion of
large quantities of jet fuel, dispersed and ignited
after "hijacked" jets crashed into each tower
on Sept. 11, 2001. That is the scenario promulgated
to the far corners of the globe by official U.S. government
sources.
Interestingly, jet fuel -- somewhat similar to common
kerosene and not much different than charcoal lighter
fluid -- burns at roughly 875 degrees. Whether a little
or a lot of fuel is burned, it still burns at roughly
the same temperature. Now: Think about all the kerosene
burning in all those kerosene heaters (and lanterns),
constructed primarily of thin, low-grade, steel sheet
metal. Think about all those kerosene heaters burning
merrily away, with temperatures perhaps approaching 875
degrees at the hottest. Think about how parts of all
those kerosene heaters would then turn into bubbling
pools of melted steel before the horrified eyes of countless
poor souls who had no idea the fuel used in their heaters
would actually "MELT" the heaters themselves.
Of course, this does NOT happen -- which gives us a pretty
good idea that what had been sold far and wide by the
U.S. government and innumerable media outlets as the "cause" of
the trade center towers' collapse is in fact absolute
fiction and fantasy, without the slightest shred of scientific
fact or collaborative evidence and testimony to support
such monstrous and utter nonsense. Hardened steel such
as that used in the WTC beams and girders needs temperatures
of approximately TWENTY-EIGHT HUNDRED (2,800) degrees
to actually melt, and temperatures approaching 2,000
degrees to turn bright red and soften,
The official version of the collapse of the WTC towers
is -- again -- that burning jet fuel eventually melted
or liquefied the massive and seriously hard steel beams
of the WTC tower(s), to the point where the beams all
gave way, unilaterally and simultaneously throughout
both the gigantic structures and causing their total
and nearly instantaneous collapse. Well, if such doesn't
happen with kerosene heaters, you can bet it doesn't
happen to huge steel-beamed buildings -- and indeed it
never has; especially when the fires which supposedly "caused" such
total structural failure had in fact long since largely
burned themselves out.
In fact, nearly a year after the monumental and treacherous
catastrophe which struck lower Manhattan on Sept. 11,
2001, an audio tape of firefighter communications was
finally released -- which proves that the actual conditions
at and near the point of impact in the north WTC tower
only moments before the building's collapse were totally
inconsistent with the conditions which had to have existed
for the official version to be even minimally correct.
Firefighters who had reached the eightieth floor of the
north tower reported they were eyewitnesses to fact much
of the fire caused by burning jet fuel had by then largely
burned out, although some burning and smoldering areas
still remained. Not once did firefighters on site at " ground
zero" of ground zero indicate the slightest concern
that fires were still burning at an intensity which threatened
their own or others' safety -- certainly not that conditions
were so severe that the very integrity of the entire
structure itself was threatened! On the contrary: they
indicated that conditions were controllable: that they
planned to conduct survivors safely out of the building,
and to then bring in equipment and personnel to extinguish
any remaining burning/smoldering areas.
And what, exactly, does all this mean? It means that
the total structural failure of the two massive, superbly-engineered/designed
edifices known as the WTC towers did NOT result from
jet fuel flash-fires burning at under 900 degrees Fahrenheit
-- when steel used in WTC construction needed temperatures
over THREE TIMES HIGHER to actually "MELT."
And THIS means that the towers were in fact toppled by
use of BOMBS or similar methods.
And THIS means that a stupendously far-reaching conspiracy
and cover-up -- involving the highest levels of US government
-- lies behind the 9-11 "attacks on America".
by Robert Anderson
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/09/nyregion/09TOWE.
html?ex=1059105600&en=3a84112d9c0719b9&ei=5070
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/09/nyregion/09TOWE.
html?ex=1059105600&en=3a84112d9c0719b9&ei=5070
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/09/nyregion/09TAPE.
html?ex=1059105600&en=dc9c7f7df4341393&ei=5070
-- 'Nowhere on the tape is there any indication that
firefighters had the slightest indication that the tower
had become unstable or that it could fall.' --
-- ' "Just two hose lines to attack two isolated
pockets of fire. "We should be able to knock it
down with two lines," he tells the firefighters
of Ladder Company 15 who were following him up the stairs
of the doomed tower.' --
Fire Department Tape Reveals No Awareness of Imminent
Doom
By KEVIN FLYNN and JIM DWYER
The voices, captured on a tape of Fire Department radio
transmissions, betray no fear. The words are matter-of-fact.
Two hose lines are needed, Chief Orio Palmer says from
an upper floor of the badly damaged south tower at the
World Trade Center.
Lt. Joseph G. Leavey is heard responding: "Orio,
we're on 78, but we're in the B stairway. Trapped in
here. We got to put some fire out to get to you."
Ladder 15 had finally found the fire after an arduous
climb to the 78th floor, according to the tape. They
were in the B stairwell. On the other side of the fire
were hundreds of people, blocked from fleeing by smoke
and flame on the stairs. Chief Palmer was facing similar
fires in the A stairwell, across the floor.
"We're gonna knock down some fire here in the B
Stair," Lieutenant Leavey is heard telling one of
his firefighters. "We'll meet up with you. You get
over to the A Stair and help out Chief Palmer."
The time was 9:56 a.m. The firefighters had just arrived
at a place where, 54 minutes earlier, many people had
been waiting for elevators when the second plane came
crashing through the building. Now Chief Palmer and Ladder
15 were surrounded by the wounded whom they hoped to
evacuate.
Like the cockpit voice recorder from a downed jetliner,
this tape, discovered in an adjacent building several
weeks after Sept. 11, is providing a glimpse into unseen
corners of the tragedy and the resolute advance of firefighters
as they encountered the largest catastrophe of their
lives.
The 78-minute tape, which was found in a room at 5 World
Trade Center where radio transmissions were monitored,
is the only known audiotape of firefighters at the scene.
In recent months, officials of the Port Authority of
New York and New Jersey, which maintained the recording
system, have allowed fire officials and family members
to listen to it. It was not publicly released, however,
until this week. The release came after federal prosecutors,
responding to a court motion by The New York Times, said
that making it public would not interfere with the prosecution
of terrorists.
Officials from the Port Authority and the Fire Department
are still debating what the tape tells them about the
breakdowns in radio communication that day. There are
several long stretches of silence on the tape. Transmissions
from only a few of the companies that operated in the
south tower are recorded. A few additional snippets of
conversation can be heard from firefighters in the north
tower, where radios using the same frequency were also
monitored.
But sections of the tape provide vivid images of the
firefighters: the breathless voice of Chief Palmer, a
marathon runner, after dashing up dozens of flights;
the assurances from firefighters to him that they are
coming on his heels; the effort to create a medical staging
area for the wounded on the 40th floor.
At several points in the tape, fire commanders can be
heard speaking with urgency. A commander alerts a colleague
that he needs more companies to handle what he is facing
in the south tower. The chiefs discuss the need to get
more elevators into service, to carry firefighters up
and to transport the injured back down.
But nowhere on the tape is there any indication that
firefighters had the slightest indication that the tower
had become unstable or that it could fall.
"Chief, I'm going to stop on 44," Stephen Belson,
an aide to Chief Palmer, tells him at 9:25 as he ascends.
"Take your time," the chief responds.
A half-hour later, the tape reveals, firefighters from
Ladder 15 had loaded 10 injured people into an elevator
and begun a descent to the lobby. Down below, fire commanders
were waiting, hoping to use that elevator, the only working
one in the building, to ferry additional firefighters
back up to the heavily damaged floors. But suddenly the
elevator stopped, according to the tape.
"You're going to have to get a different elevator," a
firefighter from Ladder 15 says over the radio. "We're
chopping through the wall to get out."
A few seconds later, at 9:58 a.m., Chief Palmer tries
to raise someone from the ladder company. "Battalion
7 to Ladder 15," he calls.
But the tape remains silent.
For well over a year, the Port Authority of New York
and New Jersey refused to release the audiotape of firefighters'
communications from the World Trade Center during the
September 11 attacks. In early November 2002, the tape
was released to the New York Times, then to other unspecified "news
outlets" (according to the Associated Press). To
my knowledge, the NYT is the only outlet to post excerpts
from the tape; no one has yet posted the entire thing.
Below are transcripts of all portions that have been
released. You can listen to them at the NYT's site by
going to this page. In the right hand column is a box
labeled "Multimedia." Inside it, click on "Interactive
Feature: The Tale of the Tape."
[read "9/11 Tape Raised Added Questions on Radio
Failures" and "Fire Department Tape Reveals
No Awareness of Imminent Doom"]
9:25 a.m.
Ladder 15: "Go ahead, Irons."
Ladder 15 Irons: "Just got a report from the director
of Morgan Stanley. Seventy-eight seems to have taken
the brunt of this stuff, there's a lot of bodies, they
say the stairway is clear all the way up, though."
Ladder 15: "Alright, ten-four Scott. What, what
floor are you on?"
Ladder 15 Irons: "Forty-eight right now."
Ladder 15: "Alright, we're coming up behind you."
9:31 a.m.
Battalion Seven Aide: "Battalion Seven, you want
me to relay?"
Ladder 15: "Yeah, Steve tell Chief Palmer they got
reports that there's more planes in the area, we may
have to back down here."
Battalion Seven Aide: "Ten-four."
"Seven Alpha to Seven."
Battalion Seven: "Steve. Seven to Seven Alpha."
Ladder 15: "Fifteen to 15 Roof."
"Fifteen Roof."
Ladder 15: "We got reports of another incoming plane.
We may have to take cover. Stay in the stairwell."
Ladder 15 Roof: "Ten-four."
Ladder 15: "Fifteen to 15 Roof. That plane's ours.
I repeat. It's ours. What floor are you on, Scotty?"
Ladder 15 Roof: "Fifty-four."
Ladder 15: "Alright. Keep making your way up. We're
behind you."
Ladder 15 Roof: "Ten-four."
9:37 a.m.
Ladder 15 Lieutenant: "Tommy, listen carefully.
I'm sending all the injured down to you on 40. You're
going to have to get'em down to the elevator. There's
about 10 to 15 people coming down to you."
Ladder 15 Firefighter: "Okay."
Ladder 15 Lieutenant: "Ten civilians coming down.
Fifteen to OV."
Ladder 15 Firefighter: "Got that, I'm on 40 right
now, Lieu."
9:39 a.m.
Ladder 15 Lieutenant: "Alright Tommy, when you take
people down to the lobby, try to get an EMS crew back."
Ladder 15 Firefighter: "Definitely."
9:43 a.m.
Battalion Seven Chief: "Battalion Seven to Ladder
15 Roof, what's your progress?"
Ladder 15 Roof: "Sixty-three, Battalion."
Battalion Seven Chief: "Ten-four."
Battaltion Nine Chief: "Battalion Nine to Battalion
Seven."
Battalion Seven Chief: "Go ahead Battaltion Nine."
Battalion Nine Chief: "Orio, I couldn't find a bank
to bring you up any highter. I'm on the 40th floor, what
can I do for you?"
Battalion Seven Chief: "We're going to have to hoof
it. I'm on 69 now, but we need a higher bank, kay."
Battalion Nine Chief: "What stairway you in Orio?"
Battalion Seven Chief: "The center of the building,
boy, boy."
"Tac One to Tac One Alpha."
Battalion Seven Chief: "Battalion Seven to Ladder
15 Roof, what floor?"
Battalion Nine Chief: "Battalion Nine to Battalion
Seven."
Battalion Seven Chief: "...Battalion Nine."
Battalion Nine Chief: "Orio, I'm going to try and
get a couple of CFRD engines on the 40th floor so send
any victims down here, I'll start up a staging area."
Battalion Seven Chief: "...find a fireman service
elevator close to 40, if we get some more cars in that
bank, we'll be alright."
9:48 a.m.
Ladder 15: "Battalion Fifteen to Battalion Seven."
Battalion Seven: "Go Ladder 15."
Ladder 15: "What do you got up there, Chief?"
Battalion Seven Chief: "I'm still in boy stair 74th
floor. No smoke or fire problems, walls are breached,
so be careful."
Ladder 15: "Yeah Ten-Four, I saw that on 68. Alright,
we're on 71 we're coming up behind you."
Battalion Seven Chief: "Ten-four. Six more to go."
Ladder 15: "Let me know when you see more fire."
Battalion Seven Chief: "I found a marshall on 75."
9:49 a.m.
Ladder 15: "Fifteen to 15 OV. Fifteen to 15 OV.
"Fifteen OV."
Ladder 15: "Tommy, have you made it back down to
the lobbby yet?"
Ladder 15 OV: "The elevator's screwed up."
Ladder 15: "You can't move it?"
Ladder 15 OV: "I don't want to get stuck in the
shaft."
9:50 a.m.
Ladder 15: "Alright Tommy. It's imperative that
you go down to the lobby command post and get some people
up to 40. We got injured people up here on 70. If you
make it to the lobby command post see if they can somehow
get elevators past the 40th floor. We got people injured
all the way up here."
Battalion Seven Aide: "Battaltion Seven Alpha to
Seven."
Battalion Seven Chief: "Go Steve."
Battalion Seven Aide: "Yeah Chief, I'm on 55, I
got to rest. I'll try to get up there as soon as possible."
Battalion Seven Chief: "Ten-four."
9:50 a.m.
"Anybody see the highway one car? Highway one car
we need it for an escort to the hospital for a fireman."
Battalion Seven Chief: "Battalion Seven to Ladder
15."
"15 Irons."
Ladder 15: "Fifteen to 15 Roof and Irons."
Battalion Six Chief: "Battalion Six to command post."
9:52 a.m.
Battalion Seven Chief: "Battalion Seven to Battalion
Seven Alpha."
"Freddie, come on over. Freddie, come on over by
us."
Battalion Seven Chief: "Battalion Seven ... Ladder
15, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should
be able to knock it down with two lines. Radio that,
78th floor numerous 10-45 Code Ones."
Ladder 15: "What stair are you in, Orio?"
Battalion Seven Aide: "Seven Alpha to lobby command
post."
Ladder Fifteen: "Fifteen to Battalion Seven."
Battalion Seven Chief: "... Ladder 15."
Ladder 15: "Chief, what stair you in?"
Battalion Seven Chief: "South stairway Adam, South
Tower."
Ladder 15: "Floor 78?"
Battalion Seven Chief: "Ten-four, numerous civilians,
we gonna need two engines up here."
Ladder 15: "Alright ten-four, we're on our way."
9:52 a.m.
Battalion Seven Aide: "Seven Alpha for Battalion
Seven."
Battalion Seven Chief: "South tower, Steve, south
tower, tell them...Tower one. Battalion Seven to Ladder
15.
"Fifteen."
Battalion Seven Chief: "I'm going to need two of
your firefighters Adam stairway to knock down two fires.
We have a house line stretched we could use some water
on it, knock it down, kay."
Ladder 15: "Alright ten-four, we're coming up the
stairs. We're on 77 now in the B stair, I'll be right
to you."
Ladder 15 Roof: "Fifteen Roof to 15. We're on 71.
We're coming right up."
9:57 a.m.
"Division 3 ... lobby command, to the Fieldcom command
post."
Battalion Seven Chief: "Operations Tower One to
floor above Battalion Nine."
Battalion Nine Chief: "Battalion Nine to command
post."
Battalion Seven Operations Tower One: "Battalion
Seven Operations Tower One to Battalion Nine, need you
on floor above 79. We have access stairs going up to
79, kay."
Battalion Nine: "Alright, I'm on my way up Orio."
Ladder 15 OV: "Fifteen OV to Fifteen."
Ladder 15: "Go ahead Fifteen OV, Battalion Seven
Operations Tower One."
Ladder 15 OV: "Stuck in the elevator, in the elevator
shaft, you're going to have to get a difference elevator.
We're chopping through the wall to get out."
Battalion Seven Chief: "Radio lobby command with
that Tower One."
9:58 a.m.
Battalion Seven Chief: "Battalion Seven to Ladder
15."
(END OF TAPE)
Experts charge official obstruction/cover-up in WTC collapse
probe; say threats received, KEY evidence destroyed New
York Times
-- 'In calling for a new investigation, some structural
engineers have said that one serious mistake has already
been made in the chaotic aftermath of the collapses:
the decision to rapidly recycle the steel columns, beams
and trusses that held up the buildings. That may have
cost investigators some of their most direct physical
evidence with which to try to piece together an answer.'
-- NY Times
-- '"I find the speed with which potentially important
evidence has been removed and recycled to be appalling" --
Dr. Frederick W. Mowrer; fire protection engineering
department, University of Maryland and WTC collapse probe
member quoted in NY Times - The New York Times December
25, 2001
THE TOWERS
Experts Urging Broader Inquiry in Towers' Fall By JAMES
GLANZ and ERIC LIPTON
Saying that the current investigation into how and why
the twin towers fell on Sept. 11 is inadequate, some
of the nation's leading structural engineers and fire-safety
experts are calling for a new, independent and better-financed
inquiry that could produce the kinds of conclusions vital
for skyscrapers and future buildings nationwide.
Senator Charles E. Schumer and Senator Hillary Rodham
Clinton, both of New York, have joined the call for a
wider look into the collapses. In an interview on Friday,
Mr. Schumer said he supported a new investigation "not
so much to find blame" for the collapse of the buildings
under extraordinary circumstances, "but rather so
that we can prepare better for the future."
"It could affect building practices," he said. "It
could affect evacuation practices. We live in a new world
and everything has to be recalibrated."
Experts critical of the current effort, including some
of those people who are actually conducting it, cite
the lack of meaningful financial support and poor coordination
with the agencies cleaning up the disaster site. They
point out that the current team of 20 or so investigators
has no subpoena power and little staff support and has
even been unable to obtain basic information like detailed
blueprints of the buildings that collapsed.
While agreeing that any building hit by a jetliner would
suffer potentially devastating damage, experts want to
examine whether the twin towers may have had hidden vulnerabilities
that contributed to their collapse.
The lightweight steel trusses that supported the tower's
individual floors, the connections between the trusses
and the buildings' vertical structural columns, as well
as possible flaws in the fireproofing have been drawing
scrutiny from fire safety consultants and engineers in
recent weeks.
"Two buildings came down," said Joseph F. Russo,
director of the Center for Fire Safety Engineering at
Polytechnic University in Brooklyn, referring to the
twin towers. "That suggests some degree of predictability."
"And if it was predictable," Mr. Russo said, "was
it preventable?"
Family members of some victims have added their voices
to the calls for a wider investigation.
The exact scope of an expanded inquiry has not been defined.
But the central desire is to learn any lessons that might
be hidden in the rubble and to pinpoint the exact sequence
and cause of the collapse, regardless of whether it was
inevitable from the moment the planes struck, members
of the investigative team and others said.
In calling for a new investigation, some structural engineers
have said that one serious mistake has already been made
in the chaotic aftermath of the collapses: the decision
to rapidly recycle the steel columns, beams and trusses
that held up the buildings. That may have cost investigators
some of their most direct physical evidence with which
to try to piece together an answer.
Officials in the mayor's office declined to reply to
written and oral requests for comment over a three- day
period about who decided to recycle the steel and the
concern that the decision might be handicapping the investigation.
"The city considered it reasonable to have recovered
structural steel recycled," said Matthew G. Monahan,
a spokesman for the city's Department of Design and Construction,
which is in charge of debris removal at the site.
"Hindsight is always 20-20, but this was a calamity
like no other," said Mr. Monahan, who was designated
by the mayor's office to respond to questions about the
investigation. "And I'm not trying to backpedal
from the decision."
Interviews with a handful of members of the team, which
includes some of the nation's most respected engineers,
also uncovered complaints that they had at various times
been shackled with bureaucratic restrictions that prevented
them from interviewing witnesses, examining the disaster
site and requesting crucial information like recorded
distress calls to the police and fire departments.
The investigation, organized immediately after Sept.
11 by the American Society of Civil Engineers, the field's
leading professional organization, has been financed
and administered by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency. A mismatch between the federal agency and senior
engineers accustomed to bypassing protocol in favor of
quick answers has been identified as a clear point of
friction.
"This is almost the dream team of engineers in the
country working on this, and our hands are tied," said
one team member who asked not to be identified. Members
have been threatened with dismissal for speaking to the
press.
"FEMA is controlling everything," the team
member said. "It sounds funny, but just give us
the money and let us do it, and get the politics out
of it."
A spokesman for FEMA, John Czwartacki, said the agency's
primary mission was to help victims, emergency workers
and to speed the city's recovery, and added, "We
are not an investigative agency."
But given the assignment to examine the structural failures
at the World Trade Center, the agency has so far spent
roughly $100,000 and Mr. Czwartacki said that more financing
could be expected after the group produced what he called
an "interim document" in the spring.
"I've heard the calls for the N.T.S.B.-style investigation," Mr.
Czwartacki said, referring to appeals by engineers and
some families of trade center victim for an exhaustive
examination like those done by the National Transportation
Safety Board when a plane crashes. "I don't think
this study will do it for them."
Mr. Czwartacki added that it was premature to comment
on whether team members were receiving necessary information
because the study has not been completed. Regardless
of what any investigation might find, it is unclear how
many civilian lives would have been saved if the buildings
had not collapsed, because so many died on the burning
upper floors.
Despite the universe of unknowns, the calls for more
extensive investigations of various kinds are coming
from engineers, fire experts and professional organizations
in New York and across the nation.
"What some of us are calling for is a probe or reassessment," said
Loring A. Wyllie Jr., a member of the National Academy
of Engineering and chairman emeritus and senior principal
at Degenkolb Engineers in San Francisco. Mr. Wyllie,
who has investigated many building collapses after earthquakes,
said the work would involve "a critique of our building
practices" in search of greater safety after Sept.
11.
He added that intensive studies of building failures
in disasters like the Northridge earthquake near Los
Angeles in 1994 had led to important structural advances.
Calling an intensive new investigation "absolutely
necessary," Mr. Russo, of Polytechnic University
in Brooklyn, said the expense could be justified by the
payoff of better safety in high-rises of the future.
Other experts take a still wider view, favoring a study
that would look at the implications of the collapses
-- a nearby, 47-story building, 7 World Trade Center,
also fell on Sept. 11 after burning for most of the day
-- for fire codes, building standards and engineering
practices across the board.
National organizations charged with addressing building
and fire safety issues have sent letters urging the federal
government to invest as much as $15 million a year to
study the vulnerability of buildings to terrorist attacks
and possible changes to fire and safety standards.
"There is an urgent and critical need to determine
the lessons to be learned from these events," reads
a letter from the American Society of Civil Engineers,
dated Nov. 15.
In other disasters, FEMA, the Army Corps of Engineers
and other federal agencies have played a more central
role in making decisions about cleanup and investigations.
But from the start, they found that New York had a degree
of engineering and construction expertise unlike any
they had encountered.
"They wanted to do a lot of things on their own," said
Charles Hess, who is in charge of civil emergency management
for the Army Corps. "Which they're very capable
of doing."
But during a recovery effort that received worldwide
praise, the city made one decision that has been endlessly
second-guessed. To deal with nearly 300,000 tons of crumpled
steel, the city quickly decided to ship it to scrap recyclers.
Dr. Frederick W. Mowrer, an associate professor in the
fire protection engineering department at the University
of Maryland, said he believed the decision could ultimately
compromise any investigation of the collapses. "I
find the speed with which potentially important evidence
has been removed and recycled to be appalling," Dr.
Mowrer said.
But Mr. Monahan, the City Department of Design and Construction
spokesman, pointed out that members of the investigation
team were eventually allowed to visit the site and inspect
steel at the scrapyards and continue doing so.
Some experts have suggested that the only way to definitively
determine the sequence and cause of the collapse is to
recover large amounts of steel from the areas near where
the planes struck, and possibly reassemble sections of
the towers.
Others say such a reconstruction of an entire section
might be impractical, but also expressed discomfort with
the impediments they said they have faced in their investigation.
For example, three months after the disaster, Ronald
Hamburger, an expert in structural analysis at A.B.S.
Consulting in Oakland, Calif., and a director of the
National Council of Structural Engineers Associations,
said he had not even been given access to basic blueprints
describing where the steel and other structural elements
had been when the World Trade Center was whole.
"I'd like to be able to have a set of the drawings
for all of the affected buildings," Mr. Hamburger
said. "I don't have that."
http://www.ecologynews.com/cuenews43updates3.html
"Why are "America's Mayor" and FEMA obstructing
the investigation of the WTC disaster? Why have they
worked so hard to destroy the evidence? Why are they
threatening the investigators and preventing them from
talking to the media? If you read between the lines of
the cautiously-worded NY Times article below and factor
in the material at http://baltech.org/lederman/bush-conspiracy-11-23-01.html
You'll see yet another huge government cover-up unfolding.
"Not mentioned in the Times article below but previously
reported on by the Times and other NYC media is that
allegedly Mafia-connected demolition companies who were
contracted by the Giuliani administration for the clean-up
stole thousands of tons of the steel beams from the WTC
disaster site. Did they really need to take such a risk
to sell the steel as scrap or were they doing exactly
what they'd been ordered to do? Also see NY TIMES 12/20/2001 "City
Had Been Warned of Fuel Tank at 7 World Trade Center" for
info on how 6,000 gallons of fuel illegally stored in
the building to supply Giuliani's supposedly bomb-proof "bunker" was
directly responsible for the collapse of WTC building
#7.
Burning Jet Fuel 'NOT ENOUGH' to Have Crumbled WTC:
Investigators//NYDailyNews
-- 'A growing number of fire protection engineers have
theorized that "the structural damage from the planes
and the explosive ignition of jet fuel in themselves
were not enough to bring down the towers," the editorial
stated.' --
Firefighter Mag Raps 9/11 Probe By Joe Calderone NY Daily
News Chief of Investigations
A respected firefighting trade magazine with ties to
the city Fire Department is calling for a "full-throttle,
fully resourced" investigation into the collapse
of the World Trade Center.
A signed editorial in the January issue of Fire Engineering
magazine says the current investigation is "a half-baked
farce."
The piece by Bill Manning, editor of the 125-year-old
monthly that frequently publishes technical studies of
major fires, also says the steel from the site should
be preserved so investigators can examine what caused
the collapse.
"Did they throw away the locked doors from the Triangle
Shirtwaist fire? Did they throw away the gas can used
at the Happy Land social club fire? ... That's what they're
doing at the World Trade Center," the editorial
says. "The destruction and removal of evidence must
stop immediately."
Fire Engineering counted FDNY Deputy Chief Raymond Downey,
the department's chief structural expert, among its senior
advisers. Downey was killed in the Sept. 11 attack. John
Jay College's fire engineering expert, Prof. Glenn Corbett,
serves as the magazine's technical editor.
A group of engineers from the American Society of Civil
Engineers, with backing from the Federal Emergency Management
Agency, has been studying some aspects of the collapse.
But Manning and others say that probe has not looked
at all aspects of the disaster and has had limited access
to documents and other evidence.
A growing number of fire protection engineers have theorized
that "the structural damage from the planes and
the explosive ignition of jet fuel in themselves were
not enough to bring down the towers," the editorial
stated.
A FEMA spokesman, John Czwartacki, said agency officials
had not yet seen the editorial and declined to comment.
Norida Torriente, a spokeswoman for the American Society
of Civil Engineers, described her group's study as a "beginning" and "not
a definitive work."
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has joined a group of relatives
of firefighters who died in the attack in calling for
a blue-ribbon panel to study the collapse.
"We have to learn from incidents through investigation
to determine what types of codes should be in place and
what are the best practices for high-rise construction," Manning
told the Daily News. "The World Trade Center is
not the only lightweight, core construction high-rise
in the U.S. It's a typical method of construction."
http://www.rense.com/general18/firefighter.htm - - -
- NY TIMES December 25, 2001 THE TOWERS
Experts Urging Broader Inquiry in Towers' Fall
...In calling for a new investigation, some structural
engineers have said that one serious mistake has already
been made in the chaotic aftermath of the collapses:
the decision to rapidly recycle the steel columns, beams
and trusses that held up the buildings. That may have
cost investigators some of their most direct physical
evidence with which to try to piece together an answer.
Officials in the mayor's office declined to reply to
written and oral requests for comment over a three-day
period about who decided to recycle the steel and the
concern that the decision might be handicapping the investigation...
Interviews with a handful of members of the team, which
includes some of the nation's most respected engineers,
also uncovered complaints that they had at various times
been shackled with bureaucratic restrictions that prevented
them from interviewing witnesses, examining the disaster
site and requesting crucial information like recorded
distress calls to the police and fire departments...
"This is almost the dream team of engineers in the
country working on this, and our hands are tied," said
one team member who asked not to be identified. Members
have been threatened with dismissal for speaking to the
press. "FEMA is controlling everything," the
team member said...
Dr. Frederick W. Mowrer, an associate professor in the
fire protection engineering department at the University
of Maryland, said he believed the decision could ultimately
compromise any investigation of the collapses. "I
find the speed with which potentially important evidence
has been removed and recycled to be appalling," Dr.
Mowrer said. |
You would not want to be George
W. Bush right now.
Not that you ever would anyhow, but especially not
now. Indeed, there are indications that not even
George W. Bush wants to be George W. Bush right now.
That second term in office, the one that just a year
or two ago seemed so precious that he was willing to
launch a war just to obtain it, now feels like a life
sentence. Plans for four years spending political capital
now look a lot more like endless months of capital
punishment.
The Bush Administration has nowhere to go but down,
and that is precisely where it is headed. Poll data
show that even members of his solid-to-the-point-of-twelve-step-eligibility
base are now deserting him as his job approval ratings
plunge like so much Enron stock, lately crashing southward
through the forty percent threshold. With almost his
entire second term still in front of him, Bush is poised
to set new records for presidential unpopularity. That
scraping noise you hear? It's the sound of sheepish
voters creeping out to the garage late at night, furtively
removing "Bush-Cheney 2004" bumperstickers
from the back of their SUVs when no one is looking.
Meanwhile, as the scales fall from the eyes of the
hoi polloi, even the one constituency which could plausibly
make the claim that Bush has been good for America
(read: their wallets), is speaking the unspeakable
as well. Robert Novak, of all
people, wrote a column last week chronicling his experience
watching rich Republicans at an Aspen retreat bash
the idiocy of Bush administration policies on Iraq,
Hurricane Katrina, stem-cell research and more. Perhaps
these folks realized when they saw Trent Lott's house
go under that Mother Nature doesn't care whether you're
rich and well-connected any more than does al Qaeda.
You may be on Karl Rove's Rolodex, but now Bush is
taking you down and your yacht too, not just forgotten
kids from the ghetto who enlisted in the Army as the
only alternative to a life of poverty.
Even conservative columnists like David Brooks (though
not Novak) are writing articles nowadays accurately
describing the changed mood of the American public.
Where those powerful currents are heading is unclear,
but given the radical right experiment of the present
as their point of departure, there would seem to be
only two choices. We can either
go completely off the deep-end and finally constitute
the Fascist Republic of Cheney, or we can turn to the
left, toward some semblance of rational policymaking.
The latter seems far more likely, especially as America
increasingly regains its senses after a long bout of
temporary insanity. These are bad bits of news
for poor George, but worse yet is that they are only
the first signs of the coming apocalypse. The real
fun stuff is just around the corner. I'll
confess to more than a little schadenfreude as I contemplate
the ugly situation staring Republicans officeholders
in the face right now. They are tethered to a sinking
ship, and have only two lousy options to choose from
as November 2006 approaches. One is to stay the course
and drown. The other is to start renouncing Bush and
his policies, appear to voters as the complete hypocrites
and political whores many will prove to be, and then
still drown anyhow. Nobody could be more deserving
of such a fate, with the possible exception of Democrats
like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry who have been even
more hypocritical yet in facilitating many of the president's
disastrous policies.
Watching these GOP opportunists jump ship will certainly
be fun, but the greatest fun awaits the president himself.
Bush has now lost everything that once sustained him.
That includes 9/11, now safely in the rearview mirror
for most Americans. That includes his wartime rally-around-the-flag
free pass, as he has failed to capture America's real
enemy, while lying about bogus ones to justify an invasion
pinning our defense forces down in an endless quagmire.
That includes, post-Katrina, the ridiculous frame of
Bush as competent leader, and the former reality of
the press as frightened presidential waterboys.
And that's the good news for W. The bad news is all
the chickens coming home to roost. The economy is anemic
and fragile, and yet Bush has played the one card in
his deck ostensibly (but never really) intended to
remedy the country's economic woes. (Remember during
the 2000 campaign when times were flush and tax cuts
were the prescription? Remember in 2001 when the economy
was in a recession and tax cuts were still the prescription?). In
any case, Bush's one-note economic symphony has succeeded
in producing precisely the cacophony of disaster that
progressive commentators have predicted all along:
massive deficits, little or no economic boost, a hemorrhaging
of jobs overseas, and a vastly more polarized America
of rich, poor and a disappearing middle class. [...]
The other demons awaiting George W. Bush just around
the bend are multiple and grim. One of these days (right?),
Patrick Fitzgerald is actually going to move on the
Treasongate story, and signs suggest that multiple
heads will roll within the White House. The political
damage will be even worse than the legal, though, as
Bush's clean and patriotic image will be smashed beyond
repair, as no one will believe that he himself didn't
know all along who committed treason by outing an American
spy, and as he will likely lose the key magicians who
have kept him afloat for five years and more. Oh well.
W's loss will be Leavenworth's gain.
And there is more. The Jack Abramoff investigation
has now been tied to the White House. There are also
presumably an infinite number of other scandals waiting
to explode (can you say 'Halliburton'?) should
the Democrats capture either branch of Congress next
year, not least of which being those concerning
the Downing Street Memo revelations. Gas prices are
off the charts and home heating bills are supposed
to soar this winter. Jobs are disappearing, along with
pensions and healthcare coverage, inflation is likely
to rise, and voters are surly already.
But, of course, the biggest cross for Bush to bear
is the one he built for himself, and thus the most
richly deserved. In Iraq, simply put, there are no
good options. None for America, that is, but even fewer
for George W. Bush.
What can he do?
He can't win. America (or, more accurately, America's
oligarchy) is clearly losing the war as it is. It is
a fantasy to imagine that, at this late date, more
troops could pacify the resistance. But even if that
were so the political consequences to Bush, especially
given his promise of no draft on his watch, would be
devastating and rapid. American public opinion has
already turned decisively against the war. Imagine
if there were a draft and all the bumper-sticker patriots
across the land had to actually make a sacrifice for
their president's transparent lies. All hell would
break loose, and the Republican Party would be dead
for a generation. [...]
Thus does a new possible ending to the Bush administration
suddenly emerge as a real possibility. Previously,
I had assumed that our long national nightmare would
be over in one of three ways, either with Bush somehow
managing to finish his term, with him being impeached,
convicted and run out of Washington, or with him being
impeached, convicted and then refusing to leave, precipitating
a constitutional crisis and even, possibly, a civil
war. Now I see a fourth very real possibility.
It was all fun and games when everybody loved him.
When the guy who had failed at everything in life except
having the right last name all of a sudden was showing
those elitist snobs who was tops after all. When the
man with a Texas size inferiority complex got to be
adored by millions as if he were some kind of religious
icon.
But what if that all changes? What
if Diminutive George, just like LBJ before him, can't
leave the completely scripted bubble his staff manufactures,
just as such set-pieces become increasingly difficult
to sustain? What if the Peevish President can't escape
- even by going to Crawford or Camp David - the mothers
of dead children, the baby-killer taunts, the stinging-because-they're-so-accurate
chickenhawk accusations, the calls for his own daughters
to go to Iraq, the possibility that everyone was
right about him all along when they dismissed him
as the family clown? What if all of a sudden, it
sucks being president? Why bother, then?
It is clear now that one way the Bush administration
might end would be with the president's resignation,
in order for him to duck into more tranquil quarters.
Who knows, maybe he could spend his days getting tanked
in Crawford, not writing another book, or going into
exile, perhaps in the south of France.
Of course, a pardon deal would have to be prearranged
with Cheney, if they haven't convicted him yet, or
with Hastert if they have. And, equally certainly,
the resignation would be put down to "the president
wanting to spend more time with his family", or
some such ludicrous McClellanism, no more or less plausible
than the rest of his daily fare. But the truth would
be plain for all to see. The frat-boy party-time president
who condemns kids less than half his age to the hell
of futile battle in support of his lies would himself
be deserting as commander-in-chief when the fun part
ended. Kinda like he did last time he wore a uniform.
History, it would seem, all too rarely delivers justice.
The privileged few go out of this life richer than
they came into it, while the poor often leave even
poorer, not to mention sooner. Those
who commit unspeakable crimes sometimes become presidents
or prime ministers, while those who dare speak truthfully
of those deeds are crushed owing to the threat posed
by their honesty. [...] |
A
sea of humanity descended upon the nation's capital
yesterday to voice its opposition to the invasion
and occupation of Iraq. My wife and I, along with
a sizable contingent from West Virginia, were among
the teeming throngs that flowed through the streets
of the District of Columbia like a raging river in
the aftermath of a storm.
The rally was about more than the shameful
events orchestrated by our government in the Middle
East, it was equally about U.S. imperialism on a
global scale. It was also about the Bush regime's
appalling lack of concern for the Gulf Coast's poor
- particularly the inhabitants of New Orleans. It
was about the complicity of Congress in the criminality
of what passes for government in America these days.
Demonstrations and acts of civil disobedience will
continue throughout the weekend.
The turnout was immense. Trying to estimate its size
from within was like standing in the midst of a forest
and trying to gage its extent. You have to wade through
the crowd and take contingency samples; or get above
it to gain an appreciation of its size and scale.
I spoke to a friend on a cell phone while marching
by the White House who was watching coverage of the
event on C-span. He informed me that C-span estimated
the size of the crowd at between two hundred thousand
to a quarter million. When I got home I looked at
coverage of the event on NBC and CBS which estimated
the turnout as about half that of C-span.
The major television networks will determine how most Americans
view of the event will be shaped. This is what interested
me--how coverage of the event would be presented to the
world. The manipulation of images and information is frequently
subtle but its effect on the public mind is often profound.
None of the networks even carried excerpts
from the many excellent speeches being given by the likes
of Cynthia McKinney, Cindy Sheehan, Jesse Jackson, Ralph
Nader and other social justice luminaries. Those speeches
- an important component of the rally - laid bare the callous
disregard the nation's power brokers have for life and habitat,
especially the poor; and particularly the black poor. By
choosing to omit them the corporate media once again failed
to provide viewers with the information they need to make
them free. They carefully steered the public mind away from
any harsh criticism of the Bush regime and its corporate
looters.
The major networks have consistently
underestimated the size of anti war protests. This has been
the case with every march on Washington that I have participated
in. By deliberately under estimating its size the
media gives the impression that opposition to U.S. militarism
and America's war on the poor and the working class is significantly
smaller than they really are.
CBS chose to highlight the three arrests that occurred
at the anti war rally on Saturday, rather than the
non violent protesters. The decision is disingenuous
in that it plants the seeds of thought in the public
mind that peaceful demonstrators are purveyors of
violence. This is in fact rarely the case. When violence
erupts in otherwise peaceful demonstrations it is
virtually always the police and FBI plants in the
crowd that causes the violence. Remember cointellpro?
It remains with us today.
Although I heard that there would
be small pro Bush, pro war, counter demonstrations occurring
simultaneously against the tide of the main event, I did
not see any of them. However, CBS chose to play up these
tiny, insignificant counter demonstrations by interviewing
Bush supporters but not the Bush detractors. This
is especially troubling because it gives the impression that
the counter demonstration, which was virtually invisible
to those of us in the streets, was much larger than it really
was. By deliberately under reporting the anti war turnout
and playing up the pro war side, reality was once again distorted
into unrecognizable, fantastic, miasmic forms in the public
mind.
The vast majority of American citizens have their
world view shaped by the corporate news media. Can
there by any doubt why the public mind is so distorted
- so disconnected from reality?
More totalitarian nations control the masses through
the use of brute force. We are seeing more and more
of that in the cities of America, as witnessed in
the streets of New Orleans recently. However, in
comparatively free societies propaganda is the weapon
of choice; and it is no less intimidating and effective
than brute force.
No one is more effectively enslaved by the power
brokers in government than those who wear the chains
of servitude but think they are free. Unfortunately,
the average American has no conception of how effectively
their perceptions are shaped and manipulated by the
media propaganda they unwittingly feed into their
unsuspecting minds.
Indeed, so superb are the propagandists who control
the flow of information in America that the average
American enthusiastically supports polices that are
detrimental to him. Thus we witness families that
espouse political and fiscal conservatism supporting
huge tax cuts for the wealthy, rampant corporate
welfare, and the writing of blank checks for endless
war waged against the world's working poor - and
they are themselves the cannon fodder for those wars.
We are witnessing a bizarre psychic phenomenon that
is the physical and spiritual equivalent of mass
hypnosis. We seem almost incapable of waking ourselves
up; or looking away from the shining pendant that
swings before our glazed, vacuous eyes. Better not
drink the kool aid.
Charles Sullivan is a furniture maker, photographer,
and free lance writer living in geopolitical West Virginia.
He welcomes your comments at earthdog@highstream.net. Only
the civil need respond. |
CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) - The
United States is not planning to invade Venezuela,
the U.S. ambassador to Venezuela said Thursday, disputing
claims by President Hugo Chavez.
Chavez has said his government has documents showing
Washington has a "Plan Balboa'' to invade his
oil-producing countrywide aircraft carriers and planes.
He said Venezuela is preparing to repel any attack.
"No 'Plan Balboa' exists,'' Ambassador William
Brownfield said.
Brownfield told reporters that Spain, not the United
States, had included Venezuela in a simulated military
exercise titled "Operation Balboa'' more than
four years ago.
Relations between Washington and Caracas have been
tense in recent months. Chavez has accused the United
States of meddling, while Washington has criticized
Chavez's decision to buy 100,000 Russian-made Kalashnikov
assault rifles.
Chavez, an ally of Cuban President Fidel Castro, has
accused the governments of President Bush and former
Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar of playing
roles in a short-lived coup against him in 2002. Both
governments denied it.
Differences between Venezuela and the United States
were exacerbated this week when a U.S. immigration
judge ruled against the deportation of a Cuban militant
wanted in Venezuela for a 1976 airliner bombing.
The judge in El Paso, Texas, cited conventions against
sending a person to a country where he could face torture
- a claim made by 77-year-old Luis Posada Carriles
that Venezuela has strongly denies.
Chavez said during a visit to Brazil on Thursday that
the U.S. ruling allows the Bush administration to protect
one of Latin America's most notorious terrorists. He
called Posada "the (Osama) bin Laden of Latin
America - a torturer, an assassin.''
Brownfield denied that the U.S. government
had a hand in Monday's court ruling, saying "it's
the U.S. courts that decide.'' |
WASHINGTON - John Roberts, President
George W. Bush's choice for Chief Justice of the Supreme
Court, won Senate approval and was sworn in to a post
in which he will shape American life for years to come.
Roberts, 50, a conservative Catholic appellate
judge, was approved as the 17th Chief Justice by
78 votes to 22, then sworn in later in the day by
the longest-serving Supreme Court Justice John Paul
Stevens at a White House ceremony.
"I, John Roberts, do solemnly swear that I will
support and defend the constitution of the United States
... ," Roberts said, his hand on a bible held
by his wife, Jane, as seven chief justices and the
wives of two late members of the high court looked
on.
The youngest chief justice for 200 years, Roberts
took office with many Bush supporters hoping he will
emulate conservative predecessor William Rehnquist,
who died of thyroid cancer earlier this month.
"I view the vote this morning as confirmation
of what is, for me, a bedrock principle, that judging
is different from politics," said Roberts.
Attention will now shift to Bush's imminent announcement
on a replacement for retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor,
a pick which could prove more controversial, as she
is viewed as a crucial swing vote on the court.
Among the audience at Roberts' swearing in were White
House counsel Harriet Miers and Alberto Gonzales, the
Hispanic US Attorney General -- both of whom have been
mentioned as possible nominees.
Bush praised Roberts as a man of modesty, integrity
and rare intellect.
He said Roberts, the first new member of the Supreme
Court since 1994, had a deep reverence for the constitution,
placing his lifetime appointment in the context of
more than 200 years of political continuity in the
United States.
"When a president chooses a Supreme Court justice,
he is placing in human hands, the full authority and
majesty of the law," Bush said, before Roberts
was sworn in below a crystal chandelier in the White
House's ornate East Room.
"I submitted to the Senate a nominee of integrity,
deep humility, and uncommon talent."
Many Democrats said Roberts' reputation
as a brilliant and fair-minded jurist, who as a lawyer
argued many cases before the Supreme Court, overrode
their concerns about his conservative leanings.
Democrats who voted against him said they feared
Roberts might turn out to be more conservative than
he appeared, and could help overturn decades of hard-fought
gains in civil rights and women's issues.
"Try as I might, I cannot find the evidence
to conclude that John Roberts understands the real
world impact of court decisions on civil rights and
equal rights in this country," said Democratic
Senator Ted Kennedy before the vote.
Democrats, split down the middle on the nomination
and throughout weeks of hearings and internal debate,
mustered only modest opposition to Roberts.
Democratic senator Chuck Schumer, who led the charge
in the Senate against Roberts, said he hoped the new
chief justice rules fairly and looks out for the "little
guy ... that he will be a lawyer's lawyer without an
ideological agenda."
Bush is under intense pressure from
conservatives to make a historic pick to replace O'Connor
that would shift the court to the right.
White House spokesman Scott McClellan said Thursday
that the president was working from a very short list
of possible candidates, after consulting around 70
senators on his pick, and could make an announcement
at any time.
Liberal and conservative interest groups were gearing
up for the new fight against a backdrop of a fiercely
partisan political climate.
"If ever there was a time that cried out for
consensus, the time is now," said Schumer.
"If the president nominates a consensus nominee,
he will be embraced -- the president will be embraced
and the nominee will be embraced -- with open arms
by people on this side of the aisle," he said. |
The White House has slowed the
announcement of President Bush's next pick for the
Supreme Court to bask - at least for a few days - in
John Roberts' confirmation. Women and minorities remain
atop what is said to be a narrowing list of candidates.
Bush initially was expected to name his second
nominee to the nation's highest court soon after
Roberts was sworn in as chief justice on Thursday. White
House advisers now say the announcement probably
won't come until next week.
Advocacy groups on the right are expecting Bush to
name a rock-solid conservative to replace retiring
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.
Liberal groups are making a last-minute push for
a moderate conservative. Senate Democrats, meanwhile,
say if the president sends up any of the nominees they
filibustered - including federal appellate judges Priscilla
Owen, Janice Rogers Brown, William Pryor and Hispanic
lawyer Miguel Estrada - they will fight to the bitter
end.
And Bush's own "short list"?
"It's not that long," was all White House
press secretary Scott McClellan would give up in the
way of hints on Thursday.
Outside observers suggest the list has been narrowed
to about five or six candidates, federal appellate
judges and perhaps a few people who have never worn
a judicial robe. [...]
Bush has
a record of nominating individuals with conservative
judicial philosophies for federal appeals court judgeships.
And, despite opposition from Senate Democrats, many
of Bush's conservative nominees eventually were confirmed,
notes Wendy Long, counsel for the Judicial Confirmation
Network, which is backing Bush's picks. [...]
"I'm hoping and expecting the
president will stay on track as he has been in the
past five years because it's succeeding now better
than it ever has before," Long said. "Why
in heaven's name would you reverse course?"
Gearing up for what Judiciary Committee Chairman
Arlen Specter said will probably be a more contentious
confirmation process, the conservative Progress for
America debuted a new television ad on Wednesday calling
for fair treatment of the next nominee.
"Urge the Senate to continue putting partisan
politics aside, hold fair hearings and give the next
nominee a fair up or down vote," said the ad,
which cost $275,000 to air for a week on two cable
networks. [...] |
The Federal Communications Commission
thinks you have the right to use software on your computer
only if the FBI approves.
No, really. In an obscure "policy" document
released around 9 p.m. ET last Friday, the FCC announced
this remarkable decision.
According to the three-page
document, to preserve the openness that characterizes
today's Internet, "consumers are entitled to
run applications and use services of their choice,
subject to the needs of law enforcement." Read
the last seven words again.
The FCC didn't offer much in the way of clarification.
But the clearest reading of the pronouncement is that
some unelected bureaucrats at the commission have decreeed
that Americans don't have the right to use software
such as Skype or PGPfone if it doesn't support mandatory
backdoors for wiretapping. (That interpretation was
confirmed by an FCC spokesman on Monday, who asked
not to be identified by name. Also, the announcement
came at the same time as the FCC posted its wiretapping
rules for Internet telephony.)
Nowhere does the commission say how it jibes this
official pronouncement with, say, the First Amendment's
right to speak freely, not to mention the limited powers
granted the federal government by the U.S. Constitution.
What's also worth noting is that the FCC's pronunciamento
almost tracks the language of the 1996 Telecommunications
Act. Almost.
But where federal law states that it is the policy
of the United States to preserve a free market for
Internet services "unfettered by federal or state
regulation," the bureaucrats have adroitly interpreted
that to mean precisely the opposite of Congress said.
Ain't that clever? |
GENEVA, Switzerland (AP) -- The
United States refuses to relinquish its role as the
Internet's principal traffic policeman, rejecting calls
in a United Nations meeting for a U.N. body to take
over, a top U.S. official said.
But while the United States stuck to its position,
other negotiators said there was a growing sense
that a compromise had to be reached and that no single
country ought to be the ultimate authority over such
a vital part of the global economy.
"We will not agree to the U.N.
taking over the management of the Internet," said
Ambassador David Gross, the U.S. coordinator for international
communications and information policy at the State
Department. "Some countries want that. We think
that's unacceptable."
Speaking Thursday on the sidelines of the last preparatory
meeting before November's World Summit on the Information
Society in Tunisia, Gross said that progress was being
made on several issues, but not on the question of
Internet governance.
The stalemate over who should serve as the principal
traffic cops for Internet routing and addressing could
derail the summit -- which aims to ensure a fair sharing
of the Internet for the benefit of the whole world. |
GENEVA, Switzerland (SOTT) --
The United States refuses to relinquish its role as
the world's policeman, rejecting calls in a United
Nations meeting for a U.N. body to take over, a top
U.S. official said.
But while the United States stuck to its position,
other negotiators said there was a growing sense
that a compromise had to be reached and that no single
country ought to be the ultimate authority over the
entire globe.
"We will not agree to the U.N.
taking over the management of the world," said
Ambassador David Gross, the U.S. coordinator for international
communications and world governance policy at the State
Department. "Some countries want that. We think
that's unacceptable."
Speaking Thursday on the sidelines of the last preparatory
meeting before November's World Summit on Global governance
in Tunisia, Gross said that progress was being made
on several issues, but not on the question of world
governance.
The stalemate over who should serve as the principal
world cops could derail the summit -- which aims to
ensure a fair sharing of the world for the benefit
of the whole world. |
ROME -- An Internet newscast called
the Voice of the Caliphate was broadcast yesterday,
purporting to be a production of Al Qaeda.
The broadcast featured an anchorman
who wore a ski mask and an ammunition belt.
The anchorman, who said the report would appear once
a week, presented news about the Gaza Strip and Iraq,
and expressed happiness about the recent hurricanes
in the United States. A copy
of the Koran was at his right hand, and a rifle affixed
to a tripod was pointed at the camera.
The origins of the broadcast
could not be verified. If the program was indeed
an Al Qaeda production, it would mark a change in
the group's use of the Internet to spread its messages. Direct
dissemination would avoid editing or censorship by
television networks, many of which usually air only
excerpts of the group's statements, and avoid showing
gruesome images of killings.
The broadcast was first reported from Dubai by Adnkronos,
an Italian news agency. The 16-minute production was
available on Italian newspaper websites.
The lead segment recounted Israel's withdrawal from
the Gaza Strip, which the narrator proclaimed a ''great
victory," while showing the Palestinian Authority
president, Mahmoud Abbas, walking and talking among
celebrating compatriots.
That was followed by a repetition of a pledge on Sept.
14 by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of Al Qaeda
in Iraq, to wage war on Iraq's Shi'ite Muslims, who
now lead a government coalition.
An image of Zarqawi, a Jordanian-born Sunni Muslim,
remained on the screen for about half of the broadcast.
The masked announcer also reported
that a group called the Islamic Army in Iraq had
claimed to have launched rockets armed with chemicals
at US forces in Baghdad. A video clip showed five
rockets fired in succession from behind a sand berm,
as an off-screen voice yelled ''God is great" in
Arabic. The Islamic
Army asserted responsibility last year for the beheading
of Enzo Baldoni, an Italian journalist kidnapped
in Iraq.
A commercial break of sorts followed. It previewed
a movie, ''Total Jihad."
The ad was in English, suggesting that the target
audience might be Muslims living in Britain and the
United States.
The final segment was about Hurricane Katrina. ''The
whole Muslim world was filled with joy" at the
disaster, the anchorman said, noting that President
Bush was ''completely humiliated by his obvious incapacity
to face the wrath of God, who battered New Orleans,
city of homosexuals." Hurricane Ophelia's brush
with North Carolina was also mentioned.
Caliphate refers to the 7th- and
8th-century Islamic empire that stretched from the
Middle East to the Atlantic, an achievement that bin
Laden has said Muslims should reestablish.
According to credits following the broadcast, it was
produced by the Global Islamic Media Front. |
BAGHDAD - Hopes grew Friday that
two French journalists kidnapped two weeks ago in Iraq
would be released by their Islamist captors.
"They are out of danger as was declared yesterday
by Sheikh Hareth al-Dhari, their release could just
be a matter of time," said Sheikh Abdel Salam
al-Kubeisi, an influential cleric on the Committee
of Muslim Scholars.
Kubeisi's organisation has privileged contacts with
the Sunni militant groups operating in Iraq. One expert
on the militants said the two Frenchmen were being
held in the Sunni insurgent stronghold of Fallujah,
west of Baghdad, and suggested that recent US strikes
on the town risked complicating the negotiations.
Another source with close links to the insurgency
told AFP on condition of anonymity that journalists
Georges Malbrunot and Christian Chesnot were still
in the hands of the Islamic Army in Iraq and being
detained in the Baghdad region.
But French diplomatic sources in Baghdad said Friday
afternoon they had no fresh information on the whereabouts
of the two reporters and expressed irritation at the "completely
groundless" speculation on their fates of recent
days.
The pair abducted August 20 on the perilous road between
Baghdad and Najaf are
"alive, in good health and being well treated" but
still captive, one diplomat said, on condition of anonymity.
"There is hope and a great chance of a happy
outcome. When will this happen? No one can tell. Maybe
today, tomorrow or the day after that, but the situation
in Iraq is such that it could not take much to scupper
the whole process."
The Islamic Army in Iraq follows the strict Wahabist
school of Islam and has already claimed responsibility
for several abductions and executions in Iraq, including
the killing of Italian reporter Enzo Baldoni last week.
The militant group thought to be based mainly in Fallujah
has demanded Paris lift a controversial ban on headscarves
in state schools to secure the release of the hostages.
But the law came into effect regardless on Thursday
as the French school year began. The ultimatum from
the captors was the first time kidnappers here had
made demands external to Iraq.
However the targeting
of a country which vigorously opposed last year's
US-led invasion apparently backfired as France
managed to muster broad international support for
its efforts to free the journalists and united
the vast majority of Muslim institutions behind
its cause.
Messages of support
continued to flow in Friday, with Shiite radical
leader Moqtada Sadr calling for the reporters'
release in recognition of France's anti-war stance
through a sermon read by one of his aides.
Another member of Sadr's
organisation accused America of masterminding the
kidnappings during a vitriolic sermon in Baghdad.
"We have concrete
information confirming that it is the Americans
who are behind the abduction. The aim is to turn
the people and government of France against us," Sheikh
Nasser al-Assadi told worshippers at al-Hikma mosque
in Sadr City.
Hardline Sunni cleric Sheikh Mahdi Al-Sumaidaie urged
the kidnappers to spare the pair and lavishly praised
France in his Friday sermon, applauding the country's
opposition to the US-led invasion of Iraq and hailing
French media coverage.
Abdullah Zekri, who represented the Paris Mosque in
a delegation which travelled to Baghdad for talks on
Thursday, cited "fear of the Americans"
and pressure from some groups wishing to involve France
in the conflict as the main reasons delaying the release.
The delegation of the French Council for the Muslim
Faith had travelled to Iraq to issue a fresh appeal
for the journalists' freedom.
Though it did not reveal its sources, members of the
delegation had voiced optimism that Malbrunot and Chesnot
could be released very soon following a meeting with
the Committee of Muslim Scholars.
The delegation left Iraq on Thursday night and was
Friday back in the Jordanian capital with French Foreign
Minister Michel Barnier awaiting new developments.
"We are still in Amman waiting for news. We hope
it will all happen today,"
said Mohammed Beshari, who heads the French Federation
of French Muslims.
Meanwhile Iraqi President Ghazi al-Yawar, who was
due in Paris on Sunday to start a European tour, postponed
his visit in the light of the continuing hostage crisis. |
A French Muslim woman, who protested
in France against the law of banning the headscarf,
said that she does not want her veil to be tainted
with innocent blood.
The kidnapping of the two French colleagues, Christian
Chesnot and Georges Malbrunot, is a crime that defiles
the image of Islam and the Arabs; not only in France
but around the world. What is the meaning in this
horrid blackmail of innocent lives who did their
job with great loyalty and professionalism? Malbrunot
was covering the news of the Middle East and the
Palestinian issue with great balance, in addition
to recording the Israeli practices inside the Palestinian
territories, to portray the daily Israeli violations
of Palestinian rights to the public opinion in France.
As for Christian Chesnot, he too is a professional
who wrote a book on the Palestinian crisis under
the Israeli occupation. Do the kidnappers wish to
deprive the world of knowing the truth simply because
of some awful blackmail?
Blackmail is cowardly. It is a crime when used in
the name of Islam with a country such as France; Jacques
Chirac is the most fervent defender of real Islam,
the Arabs, and their issues.
France opposed the war on Iraq. France is
the most persistent country from the European Union
in demanding respect of the Palestinians' rights,
the necessity to dismantle the Israeli settlements,
and ending the Israeli occupation. France passed
the headscarf law only in public schools, because
the state is secular and respects all religions outside
the government's range. Moreover, France continuously
objected to sending troops or foreign forces to Iraq
because its president is aware of the tragedies of
occupation.
How can it be possible for these organizations, which
claim to be Islamic, to threaten killing innocent people
and silencing voices that report bitter realities in
an Arab world that has never sunk so low? How can it
be possible for the Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad Allawi
to criticize a country like France for its neutralism?
Does Mr. Allawi want to lure the French armies into
the swamp of the American armies and their allies,
in an Iraq which the American forces with its modernized
military arsenal and technologically advanced weapons
were not capable of securing stability; where innocent
people are kidnapped by gangs, and mafias whose mushrooming
was reinforced by the American occupation?
Using the lives of Georges Malbrunot and Christian
Chesnot has united the French because the French public
opinion refuses blackmail. However, God forbid, if
the two colleagues are murdered, it would greatly damage
the image of Islam and the French Muslims who are united
in their demand for the release of the two journalists.
What is required is the prompt release of Georges
Malbrunot and Christian Chesnot and putting an end
to their psychological torture, and sending them home
to their families and jobs. They are soldiers of freedom
and justice. Let the crime against them and against
all the detained journalists around the world be stopped
in the name of freedom and justice. |
AUSTRALIA - Selected visitors
and refugees arriving in Australia will have their
fingerprints taken and eyes scanned in a trial the
federal government says could help improve border security
and reduce identity fraud.
The trial of the biometric technology has been unveiled
by Immigration Minister Amanda Vanstone at Sydney
Airport.
Under the trial, refugees from Africa and some overseas
visitors will be selected for further checking including
having their fingerprints and facial information taken
and irises scanned.
Senator Vanstone said the trial,
which would be voluntary, would determine the technology's
effectiveness, with a view to rolling it out for
more travellers.
"We've started doing this work in a laboratory-type
setting in Canberra and now we're shifting to a live
setting to continue our trial," Senator Vanstone
told reporters.
"What the trials are doing is testing our capacity to
capture, store, retrieve and match a range of biometric data."
"This is an exercise in making sure that when
we do switch to the use of biometric (details) in a
live context ... that we will know what we're doing
and we'll be very good at it."
Senator Vanstone said the trial was not aimed at preventing
a situation such as that of Cornelia Rau, the German
born Australian resident who was wrongfully detained
as an illegal immigrant for 10 months.
But biometric details used as part
of a national identity card could reduce the chances
of similar bungles, she said.
Senator Vanstone also said Australia would join the
US in establishing a Regional Movement Alert List aimed
at catching the people who travel on fake, stolen or
otherwise invalid documents.
Visitors checking in for Australia-bound flights using
US travel documents would be matched against records
of lost, stolen or invalid papers. |
Brain-imaging techniques that
reveal when a person is lying are now reliable enough
to identify criminals, claim researchers.
Critics maintain that the technique will never be useful
for such investigations, arguing that, as with traditional
polygraph detectors, liars could learn to fool the tests.
And researchers in the field have previously admitted
that the approach needs more work. But neuroscientists
from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
in Philadelphia have now told Nature that they believe
their test is ready for real-life scenarios.
Daniel Langleben and his colleagues use functional magnetic
resonance imaging (fMRI) to track people's brains when
they lie and tell the truth. By analysing brain activity
during both scenarios, they have developed an algorithm
that can detect lies from truth with 99% accuracy.
Team member Ruben Gur points out that,
unlike the polygraph, fMRI does not rely on controllable
symptoms such as sweating or a fast heartbeat. Instead it
monitors the central nervous system. When someone lies, their
brain inhibits them from telling the truth, and this makes
the frontal lobes more active. "A lie is always more
complicated than the truth," says Gur. "You think
a bit more and fMRI picks that up."
In the latest study (C. Davatzikos et al. Neuroimage,
in the press) the team gave volunteers an envelope with
two cards and $20; subjects could keep the cash if they
lied convincingly in the tests. Once they were inside
the fMRI scanner, each person had to press a button to
indicate whether a card flashed on the screen matched
one of theirs. They were asked to be honest about having
one of the cards and to lie about having the other.
Langleben has previously warned that fMRI is a research
tool, not a way to spot liars. But the latest research
has changed his tune. "We can't say whether this
person will one day use a bomb," he says. "But
we can use fMRI to find concealed information. We can
ask: is X involved in terrorist organization Y?"
The main advance is being able to distinguish lies from
truthful statements in a given individual. Although previously
scientists could see how the brain lit up when people
lied, results were based on the averaged brain activity
of a group of people and did not look at individual fibs
for each person. "Now we can tell when an individual
lies on a specific question," says Gur. "This
is a major step forward."
Critics argue that lab experiments do not equate to real-life
situations. Getting a reward for concealing a lie is
not the same thing as losing your job or getting a criminal
conviction for being found out, which is a far more likely
consequence, says Jennifer Vendemia, an expert in lie-detection
research at the University of South Carolina, Columbia. "There
is nothing you can do in the lab that would mimic job
loss, the death penalty, or public humiliation."
But the biggest concerns about using fMRI to detect lies,
says Vendemia, are over ethical issues, such as whether
individuals have the right to keep their thoughts private.
Critics and researchers agree that more funding is needed
to standardize the method and iron out ethical concerns
before the approach is used routinely. The
team's next step is to expand its studies to include
women, people of different cultures, and psychopaths. |
TONY BLAIR denied that he was
creating a police state atmosphere in Britain after
pledging to give officers any extra summary powers
they needed to crack down on yobs.
Mr Blair argued that traditional law was failing
to protect the elderly from the fear of violence
and intimidation. The Prime
Minister also gave his strongest warning yet that “traditional
civil liberties” would not stand in the way
of new anti-terrorism laws.
Civil rights groups said that Mr Blair was eroding
several centuries of British legal practice because
of his impatience with the justice system. He is also
keen to find new ways to tackle antisocial behaviour
to include in a White Paper on his pet project of “respect” later
in the autumn.
Mr Blair denied that new summary powers already announced
for the police to deal with problems such as crack
houses could create a “police state”. Speaking
on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme, Mr Blair said: “When
you talk about the ‘midnight knock on the door’,
that is one way of looking at it. |
At least 85 people were killed
and more than 110 wounded today when three car bombs
exploded within minutes of each other in the mainly
Shi'ite central Iraqi town of Balad, police said.
Two pick-up trucks blew up in a central shopping
street at 6.30pm and 6.40pm local time, with a third
pick-up exploding in another neighbourhood 10 minutes
later, local police Lieutenant-Colonel Adel Abdallah
told AFP.
A fourth car bomb exploded an hour later in northern
Baghdad, targeting an army patrol, although no casualties
were immediately reported.
Abdallah said at least 85 people were killed and more
than 110 wounded in the blasts.
A doctor at Baghdad's Khadimiyah hospital said 40
ambulances were dispatched to Balad, but none had yet
returned.
A suicide car bombing in Balad, some 70 kilometres
north of the capital, in June killed 10 Iraqis while
another targeting Iraqi security forces in the town
in January killed 19.
While Ramadi is predominantly Shi'ite, its province
of Salaheddin is mainly Sunni, and the
triple bombing appeared to be the latest bid by Sunni
extremists to spark a sectarian war.
Earlier this month, Al-Qaeda's frontman in Iraq, Abu
Musab al-Zarqawi, declared "all-out war" on
the majority Shi'ite population.
Some 130 people, most of them Shi'ites, were killed
in car bombings in Baghdad on the day of the announcement.
At least nine people were killed in other violence
today in the country, including four policemen in two
separate attacks in Baghdad, and the mayor of Al-Khalis,
a town 80 kilometres north of the capital.
The US military said that five of its soldiers had
been killed in a bombing in the restive western town
of Ramadi yesterday, without providing further details.
[...]
In a further sign of the lawlessness
plaguing the country, the Anglican Church said the
entire lay leadership of its Baghdad church, including
three members of one family, were feared dead after
disappearing on the road back from Jordan.
"They are almost certainly dead," said the
Nicosia-based Reverend Clive Handford, president bishop
of the Episcopal Church of Jerusalem and the Middle
East.
Maher Dakel, the lay pastor, his wife, Mona, who led
women's activities, their son Yehiya, deputy lay pastor
Firas Raad, along with the church pianist and a driver
were last heard of on September 13 after they were
attacked on the road between Ramadi and Fallujah, west
of the capital, a notoriously dangerous area.
The upsurge in violence comes amid preparations for
the referendum and the trial of former president Saddam
Hussein, which Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari Thursday
insisted be kept on schedule for next month.
"Saddam's trial date is scheduled for October
19 and it is not possible to postpone this case which
has already been pending for too long," an official
statement quoted him as telling tribal sheikhs in Baghdad.
In Washington, the top US commander
in Iraq said that the insurgency may worsen even if
the constitution is approved.
General George Casey said plans to reduce US forces
over the next year will depend heavily on the outcome
of the political process and insurgents were expected
to pull out all stops to defeat it. [...]
"As we've looked at this, we've looked for the
constitution to be a national compact. The perception
now is that it's not," he said.
He also disclosed that only a single
Iraqi battalion is capable of independent operations.
The International Crisis Group think-tank earlier
this week warned that the rushed drafting of the constitution
has deepened sectarian rifts and was likely to fuel
the Sunni-led insurgency and hasten the country's violent
break-up. |
NEW YORK - Saying the United
States "does not surrender to blackmail," a
judge ruled Thursday that pictures of detainee abuse
at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government
claims that they could damage America's image.
U.S. District Judge Alvin
K. Hellerstein ordered the release of certain pictures in
a 50-page decision that said terrorists in Iraq
and Afghanistan have proven they "do not need
pretexts for their barbarism."
The ACLU has sought the release of 87 photographs
and four videotapes taken at the prison as part of
an October 2003 lawsuit demanding information on the
treatment of detainees in U.S. custody and the transfer
of prisoners to countries known to use torture. The
ACLU contends that prisoner abuse is systemic.
The judge said: "Our nation does not surrender
to blackmail, and fear of blackmail is not a legally
sufficient argument to prevent us from performing a
statutory command. Indeed, the freedoms that we champion
are as important to our success in Iraq and Afghanistan
as the guns and missiles with which our troops are
armed." |
Reuters has told
the US government that American forces' conduct towards
journalists in Iraq is "spiralling out of control" and
preventing full coverage of the war reaching the public.
The detention and accidental shootings
of journalists is limiting how journalists can operate,
wrote David Schlesinger, the Reuters global managing
editor, in a letter to Senator John Warner, head
of the armed services committee.
The Reuters news service chief referred
to "a long parade of disturbing incidents whereby
professional journalists have been killed, wrongfully
detained, and/or illegally abused by US forces in Iraq".
Mr Schlesinger urged the senator to raise the concerns
with Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who is due
to testify to the committee this Thursday.
He asked Mr Warner to demand that Mr Rumsfeld resolve
these issues "in a way that best balances the
legitimate security interests of the US forces in Iraq
and the equally legitimate rights of journalists in
conflict zones under international law".
At least 66 journalists and media workers, most of
them Iraqis, have been killed in the country since
March 2003.
US forces admitted killing three
Reuters journalists, most recently soundman Waleed
Khaled, who was shot by American soldiers on August
28 while on assignment in Baghdad. But the military
said the soldiers were justified in opening fire. Reuters
believes a fourth journalist working for the agency,
who died in Ramadi last year, was killed by a US sniper.
[...]
Earlier this week Reuters demanded the release of
a freelance Iraqi cameraman after a secret tribunal
ordered that he be detained indefinitely.
Samir Mohammed Noor, a freelance
cameraman working for Reuters, was arrested by Iraqi
troops at his home in the northern town of Tal Afar
four months ago.
A US military spokesman has told the
agency that a secret hearing held last week had found
him to be "an imperative threat to the coalition
forces and the security of Iraq".
The news agency has demanded that he be released or
given a chance to defend himself in open court.
The US network CBS has raised concerns over the arrest
of its cameraman, Abdul Amir Younes, who was arrested
in hospital in April after he was shot by US troops.
CBS said it is concerned that he had
no legal representation at the hearing and has had
no chance to see the evidence against him. |
WASHINGTON - President George
W. Bush on Wednesday waived some defense export restrictions
on Libya to allow U.S. companies to participate in
destroying Tripoli's chemical weapons and to refurbish
eight transport planes.
It was another step in improving ties after Libya
decided in December 2003 to abandon its nuclear,
chemical and biological weapons programs.
In a memorandum to Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice, Bush said he was waiving some restrictions under
the U.S. Arms Export Control Act because it was in
the national security interest of the United States. The
law restricts defense exports to Libya because the
State Department has designated it a state sponsor
of terrorism.
Bush waived defense export restrictions "to
permit U.S. companies to possibly participate
in Libya's program to destroy its chemical weapons
stockpile," a White House national security council
spokesman said.
It also would allow for the refurbishment
of eight C-130H transport planes purchased by Libya
in the 1970s that never ended up in Tripoli's possession,
but have been held in storage in the United States,
the spokesman said.
"No decision on the disposition of the aircraft,
when refurbished, has been made," he said.
It was the latest move in improving ties between the
United States and Libya. Earlier
this year, the United States ended a restriction barring
Libyan diplomats in the United States from traveling
more than 25 miles from Washington and New York.
Last year, the United States ended its trade embargo
against Libya as a reward for giving up weapons of
mass destruction. |
The United States and its allies
must act to stop Iran's nuclear programs -- by force
if necessary -- because conventional diplomacy will
not work, three senior Israeli lawmakers from across
the political spectrum warned yesterday.
As a last resort, they said, Israel
itself would act unilaterally to prevent Iran from
acquiring nuclear arms.
Iran will not be deterred "by anything short
of a threat of force," said Arieh Eldad, a member
of Israel's right-wing National Union Party, part of
a delegation of Knesset members visiting Washington
this week.
"They won't be stopped unless they are convinced
their programs will be destroyed if they continue," he
said.
Yuval Steinitz, chairman of the Knesset Foreign Affairs
and Defense Committee, said the best hope was for the
United States and other major powers to make it clear
to Iranian leaders now there was "no chance they
will ever see the fruits of a nuclear program."
"Threats of sanctions and isolation alone will
not do it," said Mr. Steinitz.
Yosef Lapid, head of the centrist
opposition Shinui Party in the Knesset, added that
Israel "will not live under the threat of an Iranian
nuclear bomb."
"We feel we are obliged to warn
our friends that Israel should not be pushed into a
situation where we see no other solution but to act
unilaterally" against Iran, he said.
Mr. Steinitz, a member of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's
ruling Likud Party, stopped just short of a direct
threat to bomb suspect Iranian nuclear sites.
Mr. Steinitz said Israeli officials estimate that
Tehran is only two to three years away from developing
a nuclear bomb and that time was running out for the
world to act.
"We see an Iranian bomb as
a devastating, existential threat to Israel, to the
entire Middle East, to all Western interests in the
region," he said.
"Despite all the different circumstances, we
see similarities to what happened in the 1930s, when
people underestimated the real problem or focused on
other dangers. For us, either the world will tackle
Iran in advance or all of us will face the consequences." |
WASHINGTON - The Army is closing
the books on one of the leanest recruiting years since
it became an all-volunteer service three decades ago,
missing its enlistment target by the largest margin
since 1979 and raising questions about its plans for
growth.
Many in Congress believe the Army needs to get bigger
- perhaps by 50,000 soldiers over its current 1 million
- in order to meet its many overseas commitments,
including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Army
already is on a path to add 30,000 soldiers, but
even that will be hard to achieve if recruiters cannot
persuade more to join the service.
Officials insist the slump is not a crisis.
Michael O'Hanlon, a defense analyst at the Brookings
Institution think tank, said the recruiting shortfall
this year does not matter greatly - for now.
"The bad news is that any shortfall shows how
hard it would be to increase the Army's size by 50,000
or more as many of us think appropriate," O'Hanlon
said. "We appear to have waited too long to try."
The Army has not published official
figures yet, but it apparently finished the 12-month
counting period that ends Friday with about 73,000
recruits. Its goal was 80,000. A gap of 7,000 enlistees
would be the largest - in absolute number as well as
in percentage terms - since 1979, according to Army
records.
The Army National Guard and the Army
Reserve, which are smaller than the regular Army, had
even worse results.
The active-duty Army had not missed its target since
1999, when it was 6,290 recruits short; in 1998 it
fell short by 801, and in 1995 it was off by 33. Prior
to that the last shortfall was in 1979 when the Army
missed by 17,054 during a period when the Army was
much bigger and its recruiting goals were double today's.
Army officials knew at the outset that 2005 would
be a tough year to snag new recruits. By May it was
obvious that after four consecutive months of coming
up short there was little chance of meeting the full-year
goal.
A summertime surge of signups offered some hope the
slump may be ending. An Army spokesman, Lt. Col. Bryan
Hilferty, said that despite the difficulties, recruiters
were going full speed as the end of fiscal year 2005,
Sept. 30, arrived.
"We have met the active Army's monthly recruiting
goals since June, and we expect to meet it for September,
which sends us into fiscal year 2006 on a winning streak," Hilferty
said. He also noted that the Army has managed to meet
its re-enlistment goals, even among units that have
been deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
But there are compelling reasons to
think that Army recruiters are heading into a second
consecutive year of recruiting shortfalls.
The outlook is dimmed by several key factors, including:
- The daily reports of American deaths in Iraq
and the uncertain nature of the struggle against
the insurgency have put a damper on young people's
enthusiasm for joining the military, according
to opinion surveys.
- The Army has a smaller-then-usual reservoir of
enlistees as it begins the new recruiting year on
Saturday. This pool comes from what the Army calls
its delayed-entry program in which recruits commit
to join the Army on condition that they ship to boot
camp some months later.
Normally that pool is large enough at the start of
the recruiting year to fill one-quarter of the Army's
full-year need. But it has dwindled so low that the
Army is starting its new recruiting year with perhaps
only 5 percent "in the bank." The
official figure on delayed entry recruits has not been
released publicly, although Gen. Peter Schoomaker,
the Army chief of staff, has said it is the smallest
in history.
The factors working against the Army, Hilferty said,
are a strong national economy that offers young people
other choices, and "continued negative news from
the Middle East." To offset that the Army has
vastly increased the number of recruiters on the street,
offered bigger signup bonuses and boosted advertising.
Charles Moskos, a military sociologist at Northwestern
University in Evanston, Ill., said in an interview
that the Army would attract more recruits if it could
offer shorter enlistments than the current three-year
norm.
As it stands, the Army faces a tough challenge for
the foreseeable future.
"The future looks even grimmer.
Recruiting is going to get harder and harder," Moskos
said. |
MICHIGAN - Natural
gas prices this winter will be at least double -
and possibly triple - what they were last year in
Battle Creek, thanks to the thawing of a rate
freeze and recent hurricanes in the Gulf states.
State officials this week predicted 40 percent
increases for Michigan's natural gas customers because
of hurricane-related supply problems.
That projection comes as Battle Creek customers already
are seeing prices 14 percent above the state average
and nearly double what they were under a three-year
locked rate that expired March 31. Battle Creek's rates
are regulated by the city commission.
Residential bills for Semco customers in other parts
of Michigan, where the rates are regulated by the Michigan
Public Service Commission, are equal to the state average.
In April, local residential Semco
customers who benefited from the 2002 rate freeze of
$4.89 per dekatherm saw that number jump to $7 per
dekatherm. It since has skyrocketed to $9.32 in the
wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and is expected
to rise as high as $13.05 per dekatherm by winter.
"One fundamental issue we want people to understand
is that the cost of natural gas is passed through to
customers," said George Schreiber, Semco Energy's
president and chief executive officer. "We don't
make a dime on this."
And that's the good news. The bad
news is that officials agree that prices will continue
to increase for the foreseeable future.
"Indications are that, especially in the immediate
aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, natural gas
prices will continue to climb," said Timothy J.
Lubbers, Semco's director of marketing and corporate
communications.
Before winter gas bills start hitting Battle Creek
mail boxes, Semco is giving consumers a heads-up, alerting
them to higher prices in their October billing statements
and suggesting ways to keep costs down.
"We are encouraging customers to take steps
to minimize the impact of the projected gas cost increases
by enrolling in the budget payment plan and by conserving."
According to an MPSC report, hurricane-damaged natural
gas facilities along the Gulf of Mexico will continue
to struggle to get back to full strength, resulting
in a significant price increase.
"The commission is expecting average increases
for natural gas of at least 40 percent this winter,
assuming normal weather," MPSC spokeswoman Judy
Palnau said Tuesday. "What we're doing now is
gearing up to let people know about the alarming increase."
Semco officials agree with the commission's projected
estimate.
"That's not an unreasonable number," Lubbers
said, referring to the 40 percent figure. "It
could be higher or lower, though. We'll just have to
wait and see."
How does that figure translate to consumers' bottom
line?
Michigan residents who now pay an
average of $140 each winter month to heat their homes
with natural gas, for example, could end up paying
at least $56 more a month.
To combat those costs, Semco is encouraging customers
to take advantage of its flexible budget plan, which
regulates monthly billing statements based on an individual's
usage history and the projected cost of natural gas.
Customers should be aware, however,
that at the end of the 12-month billing period, if
the company's original estimate was low, they will
be responsible for paying the difference in one lump
sum.
"We are trying to monitor those costs regularly," Lubbers
said. "To avoid someone ending up with a $600
gas bill at the end ... customers should know that
the estimated monthly cost might be adjusted throughout
the year."
Semco also suggested that natural gas consumers winterize
their homes.
"Making their homes more energy efficient is
one way customers can counter the increasing cost of
natural gas this year," Lubbers said, explaining
that weather-stripping, closing vents in unused rooms
and dialing down the thermostat could make a big difference.
Schreiber said he doesn't expect natural gas costs
to decrease any time soon.
"I don't see any immediate
relief in sight," he said. "Two things
- very stringent environmental regulations and failed
environmental policy - have put us in this position."
"There is a huge increase
in demand for natural gas, but we can't increase
the supply because environmentalists have taken drilling
options off the table," he continued, referring
to drilling possibilities in Alaska's Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge and Lake Michigan.
Schreiber said that while he believes the price of
natural gas will remain high for some time, he hopes
the energy market is in the midst of a fundamental
shift.
"I think the market is finally
realizing the true cost of stringent environmental
policies that have been enforced," he said. "You'd
have to be crazy not to be for clean air and clean
water, but there's got to be a balance." |
Gov. Tim Pawlenty and some lawmakers
want to save Minnesotans money at the pump by repealing
a state law that sets a minimum gasoline price. However,
a new, one-of-a-kind study shows a repeal would send
prices higher.
Pawlenty sent letters to lawmakers this week seeking
their interest in a special session. Among the topics
to be considered would be repealing a section of
the Minnesota restraint of trade law that requires
retail gasoline stations to charge 8 cents per gallon
above the wholesale cost of the gas and all taxes.
A repeal would save consumers money and increase competition,
repeal supporters argue.
But three professors completed studies this year comparing,
for the first time, gas prices in states that have
minimum-price laws with prices in those that don't.
The studies examine monthly gas prices from 1983 through
2002 throughout the United States.
The states with minimum-price laws
like Minnesota's had lower gas prices than states without
the law, said Jimmy Peltier, a marketing professor
at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, who co-authored
the study that was released in a peer-reviewed economics
journal this year.
Another study coming out next month shows the states
with the law have fewer stations going out of business
than the national average, Peltier said.
"It's true it's counterintuitive,'' he said, "but
it's preservation of competition. All over the world,
it has been shown that the more competition, the lower
the price.''
This wasn't the first time this group had taken a
closer look at Minnesota gas prices. An earlier study
singled out Minnesota because it already had gone through
repealing and reinstating the minimum-price law. So
it was a natural test subject.
When Minnesota and Wisconsin had the minimum-price
laws before 1995, Wisconsin's gasoline was slightly
cheaper than Minnesota's. After Minnesota repealed,
the gap widened but then shrunk when the law was reinstated,
Peltier said.
While the studies were sponsored
by the Wisconsin gasoline station association, Peltier
said the sponsorship did not skew the results.
Minnesota had the minimum-price law for years before
its repeal in 1995. Sen. Steve Murphy, DFL-Red Wing,
led the charge to bring it back in 2001. He did it
because Wal-Mart wanted to sell gasoline at its stores
below its costs to lure customers into the store, Murphy
said.
"A lot of people are grousing right now because
the price of gas is so high,'' Murphy said. "But
it's not the minimum-price law that is doing it.''
State Sen. Chuck Wiger, DFL-North St. Paul, got a
bill passed in the Senate last spring to repeal the
law, but it failed in the house.
"The station owners were pretty upset,'' he said. "I
made the point that we don't regulate how much stores
charge for lawnmowers or snowblowers. There are other
tools for monopoly and price fixing that the attorney
general can use.''
Rep. Joyce Peppin, a Rogers Republican, said she couldn't
get the bill to repeal through the state House but
would like to try again either in a possible special
session or when the Legislature returns. It would help
not only consumers but also the state fleet, which
purchases more than 8 million gallons of fuel a year,
she said.
"(The minimum-price law) is anti-competitive,
and it hurts consumers,'' Peppin said.
Wiger and Peppin point to an academically disputed
Federal Trade Commission letter to a Wisconsin State
Assembly member in 2003 in which the commission said
Wisconsin's minimum-price law was unnecessary because
other laws would protect consumers against predatory
pricing. The letter stated the law "most likely''
raises costs to consumers and "many vendors likely
avoid pro-competitive price-cutting altogether'' with
the law in place.
Murphy and Michael Noble, executive director of Minnesotans
for an Energy-Efficient Economy, said it is more important
to push the federal government to enact tougher fuel-efficiency
standards on all vehicles and to put more money into
alternative fuels such as ethanol and hydrogen. Murphy
said the Bush Administration should also go after the
oil companies for price gouging.
"Changing this law that's been on the books to
protect consumers from monopoly concentrations doesn't
seem like it addresses any of the energy problems that
face us,'' Noble said. "It's really unbelievable.'' |
JOHANNESBURG - Smog, soot and
an insatiable thirst for oil: that's one image of China.
But the Asian colossus is also seen leading the
way in the use of "green" energies as alternatives
to fossil fuels, the head of a leading environmental
watchdog said on Wednesday.
"China is already big in renewables. In 5 years
time we see them as a world leader in this department," Chistopher
Flavin, president of the U.S.-based Worldwatch Institute,
told Reuters on the sidelines of an energy conference
in Johannesburg.
"Already, 35 million homes in
China get their hot water from solar collectors. That
is more than the rest of the world combined," he
said.
Renewable energy is derived from sources that are
continually replaced, unlike fossil fuels of which
there is a finite supply. Most renewables are non-polluting.
"There are prospects for real take-offs in solar
and wind power in China, and not just hot water for
homes but in industry," said Flavin.
"State-owned industries and private companies
there are investing heavily in renewables," he
said.
Sky-high world oil prices have partly been attributed
to surging demand from China and the country's overall
record on the environment has many greens seeing red.
But Flavin said the rapid growth in oil imports and
related costs was making China look for alternatives.
[...]
He said that wind power had an annual average growth
rate of about 30 percent from 1994 to 2004, while solar
energy had seen yearly growth of close to 25 percent
over the same period.
He also said that the costs from
such energy sources were falling fast, noting that
wind power in 1980 cost 46 cents a kilowatt hour but
now cost less than 6 cents.
But he said that much of the oil industry was missing
the boat and the message it was sending was that: "Real
energy men don't do renewable energy." |
A drug taken by 15,000 children
in the UK has been found to increase the risk of suicidal
thoughts, the Government's medicines safety watchdog
says.
Strattera, which is manufactured by Lilly and is
used to treat attention deficit and hyperactive disorder
(ADHD), was licensed in the UK in July 2004.
Yesterday's warning was issued by the Medicines and
Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA), which said it
would re-examine the risks and benefits of the drug.
It follows the finding of an increased risk of suicide
in children and young people taking antidepressants
called Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors (SSRIs).
All SSRIs except Prozac were banned in children by
the MHRA in December 2003.
June Raine, the director of medicines post-licensing
at the MHRA, said: "We are advising healthcare
professionals that patients should be carefully monitored
for signs of depression, suicidal thoughts or suicidal
behaviour and referred for alternative treatment if
necessary. [...] |
LONDON (Reuters) - GlaxoSmithKline
may face prosecution for allegedly not informing
health authorities about suicide risks associated
with its antidepressant Seroxat, The Sunday Times
has reported.
Europe's largest drugmaker is already facing charges
by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer over the
use of the drug, sold in the United States as Paxil,
on children.
The Sunday Times said the Medicines and Healthcare
Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) had begun an investigation
because of fears that Glaxo held back important information
from clinical trials.
The information indicated that Seroxat may cause a
greater risk of suicide and "self-harm" if
given to depressed teenagers, the paper said. [...] |
A
senior executive with Britain's biggest drugs company
has admitted that most prescription medicines do not
work on most people who take them.
Allen Roses, worldwide vice-president of genetics
at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), said fewer than half of
the patients prescribed some of the most expensive
drugs actually derived any benefit from them.
It is an open secret within the drugs industry that
most of its products are ineffective in most patients
but this is the first time that such a senior drugs
boss has gone public. His comments come days after
it emerged that the NHS drugs bill has soared by nearly
50 per cent in three years, rising by £2.3bn
a year to an annual cost to the taxpayer of £7.2bn.
GSK announced last week that it had 20 or more new
drugs under development that could each earn the company
up to $1bn (£600m) a year.
Dr Roses, an academic geneticist from Duke University
in North Carolina, spoke at a recent scientific meeting
in London where he cited figures on how well different
classes of drugs work in real patients.
Drugs for Alzheimer's disease work in fewer than one
in three patients, whereas those for cancer are only
effective in a quarter of patients. Drugs for migraines,
for osteoporosis, and arthritis work in about half
the patients, Dr Roses said. Most drugs work in fewer
than one in two patients mainly because the recipients
carry genes that interfere in some way with the medicine,
he said.
"The vast majority of drugs - more than 90 per
cent - only work in 30 or 50 per cent of the people," Dr
Roses said. "I wouldn't say that most drugs don't
work. I would say that most drugs work in 30 to 50
per cent of people. Drugs out there on the market work,
but they don't work in everybody." [...] |
Pharmaceutical giants hire ghostwriters
to produce articles - then put doctors' names on them
Hundreds of articles in medical journals claiming
to be written by academics or doctors have been penned
by ghostwriters in the pay of drug companies, an
Observer inquiry reveals.
The journals, bibles of the profession, have huge
influence on which drugs doctors prescribe and the
treatment hospitals provide. But The Observer has uncovered
evidence that many articles written by so-called independent
academics may have been penned by writers working for
agencies which receive huge sums from drug companies
to plug their products.
Estimates suggest that almost half of all articles
published in journals are by ghostwriters. While doctors
who have put their names to the papers can be paid
handsomely for 'lending' their reputations, the ghostwriters
remain hidden. They, and the involvement of the pharmaceutical
firms, are rarely revealed. [...] |
Your brain never stops working.
But it does cease talking to itself when you lose consciousness,
a new study shows.
Scientists have long wondered what the brain does
and doesn't do during deep sleep. It remains active,
they know. So what's the difference between consciousness
and the lack of it?
When we're awake, different parts of the brain use
chemicals and nerve cells to communicate constantly
across the entire network, similar to the perpetual
flow of data between all the different computers, routers
and servers that make up the Internet.
In the deepest part of sleep, however, the various
nodes of your cranial Internet all lose their connections.
"The brain breaks down into little islands that
can't talk to one another," said study leader
Giulio Tononi of the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Tononi's team used a non-invasive procedure to activate
select parts of the brain. Subjects had electrodes
attached to their heads to monitor how each stimulation
triggered reactions elsewhere.
In the early morning, when subjects were dreaming,
signals careened around the noggin similarly to when
they were awake. But at night, during deeper sleep,
the picture was much different.
"During deep sleep early in the night," Tononi
said, "the response is short-lived and doesn't
propagate at all."
Consciousness has long mystified scientists. The new
finding suggests that it depends on the brain's ability
to integrate information, Tononi says.
The compartmentalization might also help the brain's
synapses, which make all the connections that give
us thought, to take a break, according to Tononi's
colleague, Marcello Massimini.
"This process would allow cortical circuits to
eliminate noisy synapses and renormalize in order to
be ready for the next day," Massimini told LiveScience.
The reduced activity might also help explain why performance
in various tasks improves after sleep, he said.
The machine used to conduct the experiments is new.
It generates a magnetic field to provide stimulation,
and Tononi's team expects this to be the first of many
similar studies that will help researchers better understand
the mind and specific disorders of the brain.
The study is detailed in the Sept. 30 issue of the
journal Science. |
IT
IS Britain's most popular transatlantic holiday destination,
attracting more than 1.5 million visitors a year with
its sun-drenched beaches, theme parks and wildlife.
But Florida's £30 billion tourism industry
is under threat from a campaign launched by a gun-control
group which warns visitors they could be killed.
A series of alarming adverts, to be placed in British
newspapers, warns potential tourists about a new law
allowing gun owners to shoot anyone they believe threatens
their safety.
It means thousands of British families who travel
to the Sunshine State are now caught up in the ongoing
political row over gun control in the United States.
The Florida law, supported by the National Rifle Association,
was approved by the state legislature in April.
The state's governor, Jeb Bush - whose brother is
the US president - described it as a "good, commonsense,
anti-crime issue".
Critics call it the "shoot first" law and
say it allows gun owners to shoot if they engage in
a simple argument in public. Supporters call it the "stand
your ground" law and say criminals will think
twice before attacking someone.
Previously, gun owners could only use their weapons
if they first attempted to withdraw and avoid a confrontation,
and were permitted to shoot threatening individuals
only inside their home or property.
Now they can use "deadly force" if they "reasonably
believe" that firing their gun is necessary to
prevent a crime or serious injury. The law also effectively
prevents civil legal action by victims of such shootings.
The Brady Campaign to Control Gun
Violence, based in Washington DC, has pledged to "educate" tourists
by placing adverts in US cities, and in key overseas
markets such as Britain.
"Warning: Florida residents can
use deadly force," says one of the adverts. Another
reads: "Thinking about a Florida vacation? Please
ensure your family is safe. In Florida, avoid disputes.
Use special caution in arguing with motorists on Florida
roads."
The Brady Campaign - named after Jim Brady, the spokesman
for Ronald Reagan who was paralysed by a gunshot during
the 1981 assassination attempt on the then-president
- promises to also run adverts in French, German and
Japanese newspapers. The campaign officers also plan
to hand out leaflets on roads leading into the state.
Peter Hamm, the communications director of the Brady
Campaign, said: "It's a particular risk faced
by travellers coming to Florida for a vacation because
they have no idea it's going to be the law of the land.
If they get into a road rage argument, the other person
may feel he has the right to use deadly force." [...] |
A minor earthquake centered on
northern Mississippi County apparently went unfelt
Thursday afternoon, officials said. Geologists with
the Center for Earthquake Research and Information
in Memphis recorded a temblor registering 2.2 in magnitude
at 2:42 p.m. about one mile east of Manila near the
Big Lake Wildlife Management Area.
A dispatcher at the Mississippi County sheriff’s
office said no one called about the quake. Thursday’s
tremor was the seventh of a magnitude 2 or greater
recorded in the area this year. Four earthquakes
registering 4.0 or greater have been reported since
February. |
A regional earthquake with a magnitude
of 4.4 occurred in the Northern Islands, while Anatahan's
volcano continued to show signs of reawakened activity.
In a joint report, the U.S. Geological Survey and the
Emergency Management Office said the regional quake was
located between Agrigan and Pagan. It occurred on Sept.
20, two days after a 4.7-intensity temblor occurred south-southwest
of Guam. [...]
The volcano first erupted on May 10, 2003 after
centuries of dormancy, with ash plume rising to an
altitude of over 30,000 feet and covering over 1
million square kilometers of airspace above the Pacific
Ocean.
|
Waves near Cuba, in deep Atlantic
build
Hurricane forecasters today are tracking two systems
that may build into tropical depressions over the
weekend.
One of the waves has been drifting near Cuba for several
days. The second system is in the deep Atlantic near
the Cape Verde Islands.
In a statement today, forecasters at the National
Hurricane Center said the large low pressure area located
over the northwestern Caribbean Sea has become better
organized - even though upper-level winds have become
less favorable.
"Shower and thunderstorm activity has increased
and this system still has the potential to become a
tropical depression during the next day or so as it
moves slowly west-northwestward," forecasters
said.
Heavy rainfall is forecast for Jamaica, the Cayman
Islands and portions of central and western Cuba over
the next couple of days.
Meanwhile, a low pressure center about 575 miles west-southwest
of the southwesternmost Cape Verde Islands has become
much better defined today.
"Thunderstorm activity has increased and become
better organized and upper-level winds are favorable
for a tropical depression to form later today or on
Saturday," forecasters said.
If sustained winds hit 39 mph or more, the next system
would be named Stan - the 18th tropical storm of the
2005 Atlantic season. |
On the fourth
anniversary of the September 11th attacks, Laura Knight-Jadczyk
announces the availability of her latest book:
In the years since the 9/11 attacks, dozens of books
have sought to explore the truth behind the official
version of events that day - yet to date, none of
these publications has provided a satisfactory answer
as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately
responsible for carrying them out.
Taking a broad, millennia-long perspective, Laura
Knight-Jadczyk's 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth uncovers the true nature of
the ruling elite on our planet and presents new and
ground-breaking insights into just how the 9/11 attacks
played out.
9/11: The Ultimate
Truth makes a strong case for the idea that September
11, 2001 marked the moment when our planet entered
the final phase of a diabolical plan that has been
many, many years in the making. It is a plan developed
and nurtured by successive generations of ruthless
individuals who relentlessly exploit the negative
aspects of basic human nature to entrap humanity as
a whole in endless wars and suffering in order to
keep us confused and distracted to the reality of
the man behind the curtain.
Drawing on historical and genealogical sources, Knight-Jadczyk
eloquently links the 9/11 event to the modern-day
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. She also cites the clear
evidence that our planet undergoes periodic natural
cataclysms, a cycle that has arguably brought humanity
to the brink of destruction in the present day.
For its no nonsense style in cutting to the core
of the issue and its sheer audacity in refusing to
be swayed or distracted by the morass of disinformation
that has been employed by the Powers that Be to cover
their tracks, 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth can rightly claim to be THE
definitive book on 9/11 - and what that fateful day's
true implications are for the future of mankind.
Published by Red Pill Press
Scheduled for release on October 1,
2005, readers can pre-order the book today at our bookstore. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|