|
"You get America out of Iraq and
Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism."
- Cindy Sheehan
|
P I C T U R E
O F T H E D A Y
Storm
Copyright 2005 Pierre-Paul Feyte
Gold closed at a price not seen
in 17 years on Friday: $462.90 an ounce, up 2.1% from
the previous week's close of $453.40. The U.S. dollar
closed at 0.8174 euros, up 1.4% from last week's close
of 0.8058 euros. That put the euro at 1.2234 dollars
compared to 1.2410 a week ago. The price of gold, then
went up even more in euros, closing at 378.37 euros
an ounce, up 3.6% from 365.35 a week earlier. Oil closed
at 63.00 dollars a barrel, down 1.7% from $64.08 at
the previous week's close. Oil in euros would
be 51.50 euros a barrel, down only 0.3% from 51.64
the week before. The gold/oil ratio closed at 7.35
on Friday, up 3.8% from 7.08 the previous week. In
the U.S. stock market, the Dow closed at 10,641.94,
down 0.3% from10,678.56 a week earlier. The NASDAQ
closed at 2160.35 for the week, down 0.7% from 2,175.51.
The yield on the ten-year U.S. Treasury note closed
at 4.27%, up 15 basis points from 4.12 a week earlier
and up 24 basis points over the last two weeks on clear
inflation fears.
Ominously, gold has reached a 17-year high on inflation
fears (a euphemism, perhaps for "fear of a complete
currency collapse"). Also influencing
the price of gold was the clarity with which the
weakness of the U.S. government was exposed with
Katrina and the Iraq War.
Gold
settles at new 17-year peak
U.S. benchmark gold futures closed at a 17-year
high on Friday as robust demand for bullion and jitters
over inflation and the U.S. economy stoked a buying
spree in the precious commodity for a second straight
day.
December delivery gold on the New York Mercantile
Exchange's COMEX division climbed $4 to end at $463.30
an ounce. The session high at $464 was the loftiest
level for a most-active futures contract in New York
gold since June 1988.
Gold's rally this week has added $10, or 2.3 percent,
to the December gold contract.
Prices extended gains after first hitting a 17-year
peak on Thursday as money from investment funds and
independent traders continued to flow into the market,
traders and analysts said.
"The inflation signals are getting to be stronger
and stronger and that's what is attracting the buying," said
Frank Aburto, a broker at Rosenthal-Collins Group
in New York. "And it is not over yet."
Gold, seen as a classic hedge against inflation
and economic uncertainty, has benefited from record
crude oil and gasoline prices and doubts about
U.S. economic strength and the dollar, especially
after the destruction wrought by Hurricane Katrina
along the U.S. Gulf Coast.
Higher energy costs, already hitting U.S. citizens
hard, will hit even harder when the cold weather hits.
Economically, Katrina came at a time so precarious
that it may push the U.S. economy over the edge. As
Jeff Berg put it:
[H]ad Katrina passed through say at the end of
Clinton's term she very likely would have been
a storm the status quo would have weathered . But
coming as she does when America's balance sheet
is in such a precarious position* is sure to pique
the interest of those very influential members
of the elite that concern themselves with such
mundane matters as how things get paid for. When
this is added to the administration's culpability
in weakening New Orleans defenses, and America's
ability to come to the aid of its own citizens
in times of a national emergency, it is very likely
to shake the faith of even the most devout members
of the BAU parties. (BAU: business as usual)
*This analysis assumes that America is particularly
vulnerable at this time because its debt-to-asset
and debt-to-GDP ratios as well as its national
debt, the percentage of its national debt that
is foreign held, its budgetary deficit and capital
accounts deficit are all at their highest levels
in American history. Furthermore they are also
higher than the levels experienced by countries
that have subsequently crashed such as Argentina
in 2001, Russia in 1991 and America in 1929.
Here's a succinct explanation of why the economy will
crash sooner rather than later by two short sellers,
Lee Mikles and Mark Miller interviewed in Barrons (quoted in
James Wolcott's blog:
Barron's asks: "Why do you think we are at
an inflection point?
"Mikles: Bottom line, the consumer is broke
and he doesn't know it yet. But he is about
to find out. All the buckets that propelled
consumer spending are empty now, whether it is
the increase in mortgage debt, the increase in
consumer debt or the reduction in the savings rate.
No one statistic will tip the scale at the end
of the day. But one very obvious and very curious
statistic is that we have dipped into a negative
savings rate for the first time. That is not only
unsustainable, it is sustainable only for a few
months. That's important to note because it tells
you consumers are borrowing money to make debt
payments. The U.S. consumer has become payment
driven. He is driven not by the aggregate amount
of debt he possesses but by the amount of the payment.
And now the consumer has not only taken his savings
rate to nothing, it has turned negative.
"Miller: Every month there is some increase
in consumer borrowing that has to occur just for
the consumer to stay level. The consumer is treating
his balance sheet much the way the government is
treating theirs, but, of course, the consumer can't
create currency like the government can. The point
is the consumer cannot continue to borrow to make
his debt-service payments for very long. How did
we get here? We got here because of the huge differential
between wage growth and what we spend and what we
consume.
"Q: What about the argument that consumers
may not be saving but the appreciation they have
seen on their houses is a form of savings?
"Mikles: The consumer doesn't know he is
broke because his house hasn't stopped going up
yet. It hasn't starting going down, it just hasn't
stopped going up. Once it stops going up, the
consumer will immediately -- and I mean a matter
of months -- find out that he is, in fact, broke."
The point that every United States citizen should
take to heart, though, is that the people in charge
at the moment do not care about any of this. They
see Katrina as a stroke of luck economically and a
political difficulty that can be survived. Why?
Here's the "Voice of the White House:"
First, all of the poor blacks (and other unproductive
and non-spending individuals) will be forced out
of their sodden homes because of ‘health
reasons.' Then, if fires don't level whole poor
neighborhoods, FEMA will order these buildings
raised to the ground as 'unhealthy" and 'uninhabitable.'
The owners, or residents, will have been dispersed
throughout the country but will be duly notified
by a proper advert placed in an obscure official
New Orleans legal paper that the houses are being
torn down and that the owners will be liable for
the costs of destruction. Naturally, these people
will not read the legal notices and their houses
will be smashed flat and the remains put into trucks
and used for landfill somewhere else.
Following this, liens will be placed on the property
for the costs of tearing down the homes and again,
the owners will not be aware of this and will not pay.
The vacant lots will then be siezed by the authorities
for non-payment and put up for sale. And a cartel, already
formed, will purchase these vacant lots for five
cents on the dollar and after this, the government
will proudly announce that
"new, affordable, housing will be built for
the citizens of New Orleans."
Bids will be let, contests held for the designing
of attractive buildings and much hype will follow
with, no doubt, a smirking President telling the
world, and potential voters, that he and his people
are indeed showing rare compassion and concern for
the dispossessed. Of course, 'affordable housing'
does not mean cheap housing and the new homes,
built out of government (read taxpayer) money will
be sold, or leased, through another government agency,
to affluent members of the middle class, businesses
and others. In one stroke, undesirable welfare blacks
will be chased off of valuable lands and the many
friends of the current Administration will become
further enriched.
As far as the helpless and exploited exportees are
concerned, the President will thank, on behalf of
the American people, all those wonderful communities
who now house and clothe the dispossessed and newly-homeless of
New Orleans and, most especially, pay for their food
and living out of local, and not Federal, funds.
And of course, the levees will quickly be rebuilt,
by Republican-friendly and well-paid contractors,
and New Orleans, like the phoenix, will be reborn from
the shit-filled mud, commerce will blossom and
thanks to FEMA and the President, the Administration
will be much richer on a personal basis.
Here
is Al Martin :
Governor Blanco of Louisiana, and Mayor Nagin
of New Orleans are playing the good cop against
Bush's bad cop. They kept saying – Where
is the cavalry and when are they coming?
Why? Because they stand to profit the most from
casinos. They're going to be receiving the preponderance
of bribes that are paid out locally. Payback money,
etc. So this is a good bargaining chip for them.
Then the road will be clear for New Orleans to
become the new Vegas, the Vegas of the Gulf.
How convenient. A hurricane displaces a Black BOVOB
[Burned-Out Victims of Bushonomics] population,
that now gets dispersed because this is a population
that has nothing -- no skills, nothing, and that
has always relied on government assistance programs.
And yet you notice how reticent the government,
particularly FEMA and OEM, have been about mentioning
the facilities where these people are going.
…They are going to FEMA-controlled facilities
in Texas, Oklahoma and other states where they
will be detained for at least five months. This
plan to disperse 200,000 or more people across
the nation will keep them under federal control
in discreet facilities. Notice how reticent the
federal government has been in even publicly announcing
where the facilities are located that these people
are going to be housed in.
Former KGB General Yevgeni Primakov warned us of
the establishment of American Gulags, when he said
that it requires only an incident and the political
will to establish them.
Could these then be the new plantations that everybody
can look forward to? If you are a BOVOB, this is the
new plantation. And it doesn't distinguish between
Black, White or Latino. There is no color barrier.
If you have been declared seditious, which means anti-Bush
and you are an economically unproductive citizen, your
credit rating is below a certain level, and you don't
have a job, or whatever, then it's the CILF for you.
These are the new improved Civilian Inmate Labor Facilities,
the New Plantation or the American Gulag.
And if you think that this means Hillary, forget
it. She doesn't have a prayer. They're not going to
let go. Because everybody in this country is now concerned
about hanging on to what they got. Even if that means
that there's got to be 3 million or 30 million or who
knows how many millions of BOVOBs put discreetly out
of sight on federal lands in controlled facilities
-- so no one has to see them or be interested in them
or have them in your face.
Bushonomics, after all, creates victims
-- victims of its own economics. And ultimately
you have to have someplace to put these
people.
As long as we have a new imperial senate, we might
as well have a new slave caste. With the top 1%
of the population now controlling 70% of the nation's
private wealth, at some point you have to have
facilities to put the victims.
Bushonomics is a trickle-up form of economics. Eventually
everything will trickle up from the bottom 10 or 20%,
so there is nothing left to trickle up from them. And
then, what do you do with these people?
You can't generate enough new jobs in
the economy, particularly unskilled or
semi-skilled labor jobs. When you combine
this with the Bushonian job exportation
program to seek higher productivity in
the economy, you're creating, effectively,
a new slave caste here. Ultimately you
have to have the ability to house them,
to control them and to get something productive
out of them without damaging an already
fragile economy, which incidentally was
made fragile by your very own economic
policies.
How do you make these people pay for themselves
and be productive, without damaging the economy?
You can't put them into the economy and take away
jobs from loyal citizens. Ultimately you have got
to put them in work camps.
On Friday, Sept 9, Tom DeLay's most recent pronouncement
with regards to Hurricane Katrina in an interview
with a CNBC reporter, when asked -- Who ultimately
would be in charge of distributing the $51.4 billion
in Hurricane Katrina aid voted by the Senate today,
Tom DeLay admitted that he didn't have a clue as
to who would be in charge of it, but that certainly
some of it would be wasted.
Readers should be reminded of the fraud in the
Iraq War slash fund headed by Paul Bremer. He got
away with a reported $9 billion with no accountability.
Now we don't know how much it is going to be absconded
with, but even DeLay came out and said that some
would be wasted.
Earlier last week, the GAO came out with its final
audit on the federal spending on the four hurricanes'
relief in Florida last year. The federal government
had spent $5.5 billion in federal relief monies
in Florida, of which, the GAO points out, $3.9
billion cannot be accounted for.
So -- if the Bushonian fraction holds true, approximately
$37 billion of this $51 billion would be defrauded.
That's why Dick Cheney was smiling when they showed
him in New Orleans. They were interviewing him and
he was saying how awful it is, and he had a team of
6 guys from Halliburton with him.
Among other things, Fascism is economic suicide. Everything
of value goes to the war machine (and to enrich the
circle of insiders) and eventually gets consumed in
a great conflagration. Fascism is the political embodiment
of the Entropic Principle or of Freud's Death Drive,
the rejection of creativity and change and the ultimate
desire for obliteration, for stillness, for non-existence.
Just look at some pictures of Germany or Japan in late
1945 and 1946.
The French philosopher Gilles Deleuze and radical
psychiatrist Felix Guattari write of the "paradox
of fascism,"
…the way in which fascism differs from
totalitarianism. For totalitarianism is a State
affair… Even in the case of a military dictatorship,
it is a State army, not a war machine, that takes
power and elevates the State to the totalitarian
stage. Totalitarianism is quintessentially conservative.
Fascism, on the other hand, involves a war machine.
When fascism builds itself a totalitarian State,
it is not in the sense of a State army taking power,
but of a war machine taking over the State. A bizarre
remark by Virilio puts us on the trail: in fascism,
the State is far less totalitarian then it is suicidal. There
is in fascism a realized nihilism. Unlike the totalitarian
State which does its utmost to seal all possible
lines of flight, fascism is constructed on an intense
line of flight, which it transforms into a line
of pure destruction and abolition…
Suicide is presented not as a punishment but as
the crowning glory of the death of others. One can
always say that is is just a matter of foggy talk
and ideology, nothing but ideology. But that is not
true. The insufficiency of economic and political
definitions of fascism does not simply imply a need
to tack on vague, so-called ideological determinations.
We prefer to follow Faye's inquiry into the precise
formation of Nazi statements, which are just as much
in evidence in politics and economics as in the most
absurd of conversations. They always contain the "stupid
and repugnant" cry, Long live death!,
even at the economic level, where the arms expansion
replaces growth in consumption and where investment
veers from the means of production toward the means
of pure destruction… A war machine
that no longer had war as its object and would
rather annihilate its own servants than stop the
destruction. (Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, A
Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia,
Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1987,
pp. 230-1)
Deleuze and Guattari here quote a passage from Paul
Virilio that shows how little chance we have to avoid
the final end with any sort of normal political opposition
to the Bush regime arising from disgust at its reaction
to the disaster:
"It was in the horror of daily life and
its environment that Hitler finally found his
surest means of governing, the legitimation of
his policies and military strategy; and it
lasted right up to the end, for the ruins
and horrors and crimes and chaos to total war,
far from discharging the repulsive nature of
its power, normally only increase its scope. Telegram
71 is the normal outcome: If the war is lost,
may the nation perish. Here Hitler decides
to join forces with his enemies in order to complete
the destruction of his own people, by obliterating
the last remaining resources of its life-support
system, civil reserves of every kind (potable
water, fuel, provisions, etc.)." (from Paul
Virilio, L'insécurité
du territoire, ch.1)
The sick feeling people in the U.S. and around the
world feel now watching the "horror of daily life" in
New Orleans on their television screens comes from
the deep feeling that we will all be experiencing this
soon, and that with each degradation the grip of those
in power will grow stronger.
And Fascism is now being welcomed by the populace in
the United States as a solution to the problems that
it itself has caused, when the media and public were
relieved when the U.S. military occupied a U.S. city. The
sick, slavish fawning over military leaders is another
feature of Fascism. Here is Bill Van Auken:
US media
hails martial law general in New Orleans
By Bill Van Auken
13 September 2005
The abject failure of American capitalist society
in face of the human tragedy in New Orleans, and
the disaster's exposure of the stark social polarization
in the US, have proven deeply unsettling for the
ruling elite and the more comfortable sections of
the upper middle class.
In search of reassurance, the media has latched
onto an unlikely hero—the US Army general who
is overseeing what amounts to martial law in New
Orleans, directing thousands of heavily armed troops
in this largely deserted American city littered with
floating corpses.
The media is systematically promoting Lt. Gen.
Russel Honore. He is portrayed as the antidote
to the miserable incompetence and negligence exhibited
by every level of government in the first four
days following the hurricane, when the poor, the
elderly, the sick and infant children were left
literally to die in the streets without aid.
Anyone who has lived in countries which have a history
of military coups (e.g., Latin America, Pakistan, etc.)
know that initially, military takeovers of government
are welcomed. The military is seen as "able
to get things done" and as less susceptible to
corruption than the civilian government. That
is why the display of incompetence by FEMA was deliberate,
in my view.
Honore was first hailed by New Orleans' Democratic
Mayor Ray Nagin as "one John Wayne dude," a
characterization that the television networks,
followed by the print media, gleefully echoed.
Now he is the subject of lengthy panegyrics in
the press, extolled as the city's savior. Among
the sickest and most fawning of these tributes
was a piece published Monday in the "Style" section
of the Washington Post.
"There's the swagger, and that ever-present
stogie," it reads. "There's the height
and heft of his physique. And that barking voice
with its font of perhaps impolitic obscenities...
not to mention his penchant for not suffering fools,
as is the prerogative of a three-star general."
No cliché is spared in extolling the martial
law commander. He doesn't speak, he "barks." He
doesn't walk, he "strides." He is, the Post reporter
tells us, "a soldier's soldier, the man you
want in the trenches with you, the kind of man
who'll cover your back."
The tone of the article, written by Post reporter
Lynne Duke, is that of a lovesick schoolgirl, lacking
a shred of objectivity, much less critical skepticism. Duke's
colleagues working the story in New Orleans may
have a somewhat more jaundiced view of the general,
having been subjected to harassment and restrictions
at the hands of the military.
Honore's "barking" has not infrequently
been directed at anyone questioning the government's
role in New Orleans. A prominent target of his "impolitic
obscenities" has been reporters asking why relief
did not come sooner.
…As head of the military's Task Force Katrina,
Honore played a principal role in engineering an
intervention that delayed any significant aid to
the tens of thousands of people left without water,
food, shelter or medical assistance during those
first horrific four days.
His agenda was that of the Pentagon, which ordered
the city sealed—no relief in, no evacuees
out—until the military could intervene with
overwhelming force to impose law and order and
defend private property. He acted on the basis
of plans and doctrines designed not for relief
of human suffering, but suppression of civil unrest.
The result was many more needless deaths. All this
is conveniently forgotten in the media's lionizing
of the "take-charge" general.
…[A] piece entitled "‘Man of Action'
What City Needed," released Sunday by the Associated
Press, was even more explicit. "To troops, he's
the ‘Ragin' Cajun,' an affable but demanding
general barking orders to resuscitate a drowning
city," the article declared. "To his country,
he's an icon of leadership in a land hungry for a
leader after a hurricane exposed the nation's vulnerability
to disasters."
The content of these articles is both ridiculous
and ominous. It would seem that those who seek
to shape public opinion in America are promoting
the idea that the country's immense problems—and
its "hunger for a leader"—may be
answered by the rise of a military man on horseback.
There is an objective basis and a profound political
logic behind such conceptions. The "vulnerability
to disasters" of which the AP speaks is the
product of more than a quarter century of attacks
on social programs in general, and civilian disaster
relief capabilities in particular.
Meanwhile, spending on the military has been
exempted by Democrats and Republicans alike in
their attacks on "big government," leaving
the Pentagon the only agency with the resources
to mount a response to an event like Katrina. FEMA
(Federal Emergency Relief Agency), which is ostensibly
in charge of such operations, proved itself utterly
unprepared and ineffectual, in the end serving
primarily as a stalking horse for the military,
diverting and blocking aid until there were sufficient "boots
on the ground."
While FEMA had made no serious preparations for
responding to the catastrophe, the Pentagon had
a well-rehearsed strategy and the troops to implement
it. In tandem with the growth of militarism abroad
and the attacks on democratic rights at home, the
US military has made extensive preparations for
the takeover of American cities and the imposition
of martial law throughout the country.
It is not merely a matter of turning to the military
out of expediency, however. There are deep concerns
within America's financial oligarchy about the country's
political stability. The gulf separating the super-rich
at the top of the economic ladder—who control
both major parties—and the great majority of
American working people has become so great as to
render any form of democracy unworkable.
The storm that hit New Orleans brought this social
chasm starkly into the open and, with it, the potential
for social upheavals. The greatest fear within the
American establishment is that out of this deepening
crisis there will emerge a mass political challenge
to the profit system. These are the conditions in
which a martial law general is being offered as an "icon
of leadership."
The shameless promotion of General Honore must serve
as a political warning. There is no significant section
of the US ruling elite that is committed to the defense
of democratic rights and the maintenance of democratic
forms of rule. To defend its vast wealth and power
against the social demands of the majority, the American
plutocracy is prepared to resort to the methods of
police-military dictatorship.
In other ominous news, Delta and Northwest airlines
filed for bankruptcy in order to get out of pension
and health insurance payments to their retirees, clearly
demonstrating the
end game of deregulation:
The bankruptcy filings, with their brutal implications
for tens of thousands of workers, are themselves
the culmination of a process of unrestrained
profiteering and self-enrichment that was set
in motion by the deregulation of the US airline
industry in 1978. Nearly thirty years later,
it is abundantly clear that what was billed as
encouraging competition and unleashing the dynamic
impetus of the "free market"
was a means of plundering the assets of the airlines
for the benefit of the financial elite.
Hundreds of thousands of jobs have been destroyed,
wages and benefits have been repeatedly slashed,
and now the pensions and health provisions of retired
workers are being wiped out, while a small fraternity
of corporate CEOs gorge themselves with multi-million-dollar
salaries and bonuses.
Since deregulation was initiated—under the
Democratic administration of Jimmy Carter—major
airlines have disappeared entirely, such as Braniff,
Pan American, Trans World Airlines and Eastern. The
removal of government regulation has encouraged,
not efficiency, but irrationality and chaos in the
organization of routes and the setting of fares.
Passengers, especially the vast majority who cannot
afford the exorbitant price of first class tickets,
are now handled little better than cattle, crammed
into overcrowded cabins and, on most flights, denied
a meal.
The airlines themselves have become milch cows
for CEOs who enrich themselves at the expense of
their own companies. Northwest Chairman Gary Wilson,
for example, the largest single shareholder, has
been dumping his own stock hand over fist. The Wall
Street Journal reported June 13 that, according
to Securities and Exchange Commission filings,
Wilson cut his stake to 1.75 million shares from
4.34 million between March 31 and the first week
in June.
Al Checchi, a former co-chairman who worked with
Wilson to acquire Northwest in 1989, sold $26.4
million worth of Northwest stock between January
and June, according to the Minneapolis Star
Tribune.
These top executives and company insiders dumped
their stock knowing that in so doing they were worsening
the financial position of the company and making
bankruptcy filing all the more likely. While they
were protecting their own fortunes, they were demanding
ever more draconian sacrifices from their employees.
The living standards of workers, the comfort and
safety of passengers and the general public interest
have all been subordinated to the naked drive for
profit, and unscrupulous asset-strippers and speculators
such as Frank Lorenzo and Carl Icahn have risen to
the heights of corporate power.
With the latest bankruptcy filings, the final act
in the drama is unfolding, as the airline industry
undergoes a further consolidation, resulting in a
few mega-airlines which will cut all unprofitable
routes, close down hubs and ratchet up ticket prices
to previously unheard of levels.
The bankruptcy of Northwest and Delta is one more
expression of the failure of the profit system. The
same fundamental tendencies of social dysfunction
and decay that have found an appalling expression
in the needless destruction of lives and communities
from Hurricane Katrina take another socially destructive
form in the chaos and collapse of the airline industry.
In what cannot have been a surprise, but is being
presented as one, U.S. consumer
confidence fell to the lowest level since
the last Bush recession in 1992, a fall that will help
to make the economic collapse more likely, a matter
of months if not weeks away. |
MEMPHIS, Tenn. -- A university
student from Egypt was ordered held without bond after
prosecutors said they found a pilot's uniform, chart
of Memphis International Airport and a DVD titled "How
an Airline Captain Should Look and Act" in his
apartment.
The FBI is investigating whether Mahmoud Maawad, 29,
had any connection to terrorists. He is awaiting trial
on charges of wire fraud and fraudulent use of a Social
Security number.
Maawad, who is in the United States illegally, told
the judge during a hearing Thursday that he is studying
science and economics at the University of Memphis.
"My school is everything. I stay in this country
for seven years; I stay for the school," he said.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Steve Parker said Thursday
that the airport-related items were found during a
Sept. 9 search.
"The specific facts and circumstances are scary," Parker
said.
U.S. Magistrate Judge S. Thomas Anderson ruled that
Maawad be held without bond.
"It is hard for the court to understand why he
has a large concentration of those (aviation) items,
and nothing else to indicate Mr. Maawad plans to stay
in the community," Anderson said.
Maawad had ordered $3,000 in aviation materials, including
DVDs titled "Ups and Downs of Takeoffs and Landings," "Airplane
Talk," "Mental Math for Pilots" and "Mastering
GPS Flying," FBI agent Thad Gulczynski testified.
The company reported Maawad to authorities
when he didn't pay for $2,500 of merchandise it had
delivered, Gulczynski said. |
WASHINGTON
- Former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein used a secret
mail network to try to stoke a rebellion against US-led
forces in the time between his downfall in April 2003
and his capture in December that year.
Often switching locations in an attempt to avoid
his enemies, Saddam "fired off frequent letters
filled with instructions for his subordinates," the
weekly news magazine Time says in its issue to appear
Monday, quoting "current and former" intelligence
officials.
Some letters "were pathetic," it says.
"In one, he explained guerrilla tradecraft to
his inner circle, how to keep in touch with one another,
how to establish new contacts, how to remain clandestine.
"Of course, the people doing the actual fighting
needed no such advice, and decisions about whom to
attack, when and where were made by the (insurgency)
cells," which were supplied with money, arms and
logistical support by Saddam's minions, it says.
On the other hand, Saddam did make a strategic decision
that changed the course of the insurgency, which has
since widened beyond its original Baathist core to
include religious extremists, nationalists and individuals
angered by the US occupation.
"In early autumn (of 2003), he sent a letter
to associates, ordering them to change the target focus
from coalition to Iraqi collaborators, that is, to
attack Iraqi police stations," the report says.
Saddam is to go on trial next month before the Iraqi
Special Tribunal over a 1982 massacre in a Shiite village
north of Baghdad following an attempt on his life there.
The sources interviewed by Time were gloomy about
the war and critical of President George W. Bush's
preparations for the aftermath of the conflict.
"The officers believe it's a war fought with
insufficient resources and a war that almost all of
them now believe is not winnable militarily," Time
says. |
From 4 October 2005, the United States government
requires all visitors to provide a US destination
address prior to their departure.
If you are travelling to the US from this date, please
note the following:
- The address you provide must include a zip
code.
- If you are providing a hotel address, it must
include the hotel name, street name, city and
state; a zip code is also preferred.
- If you are joining a cruise ship, provide the
vessel and cruise names, and the US city of embarkation.
- If you are in transit, provide your final country
of destination, the carrier or vessel name, and number.
- If you are hiring a car, provide the intended
address of your first night in the US.
Please have this information with you during booking
or prior to your departure, as you will be asked to
provide your destination address in the US.
Travellers who are exempt from having to provide a
US destination address include US citizens and Legal
Permanent Residents (LPRs). However, LPRs must provide
their Alien Registration Number. |
WASHINGTON - A hunger strike
at the US military's prison camp at Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba, has unsettled senior commanders and produced
the most serious challenge yet to the military's effort
to manage hundreds of terrorism suspects.
Quoting unnamed lawyers and officials, The
New York Times newspaper said as many as 200 prisoners
-- more than a third of the camp's population --
have refused food in recent weeks to protest conditions
and prolonged confinement without trial.
While military officials put the number of those
participating at 105, they acknowledge that 20 of them,
whose health and survival are being threatened, are
being kept at the camp's hospital and fed through nasal
tubes and sometimes given fluids intravenously, the
report said.
The military authorities were so concerned about
ending a previous strike this summer that they allowed
the establishment of a six-member prisoners' grievance
committee, said the Times.
But the committee was quickly disbanded.
The reports quotes Major Jeffrey Weir, a spokesman
at the base, as saying the prisoners who are being
fed at the hospital are generally not strapped to their
beds or gurneys but are in handcuffs and leg restraints.
A 21st prisoner at the hospital is voluntarily accepting
liquid food, the report said.
Major Weir said the prisoners usually accept the
nasal tubes passively because they know they will be
restrained and fed forcibly if necessary, the paper
reported.
"We will not let them starve themselves to the
point of causing harm to themselves," The Times
quotes the major as saying. On at least one occasion,
he said, a prisoner was restrained and forcibly fed.
The paper said one law enforcement
official who has been fully briefed on the events said
senior military officials had grown increasingly worried
about their ability to control the situation.
A senior military official, also speaking on the
condition of anonymity, described the situation as
greatly troublesome for the camp's authorities and
said they had tried several
ways to end the hunger strike, without success,
The Times reported. |
WASHINGTON - Former US president
Bill Clinton sharply criticised George W. Bush for
the Iraq War and the handling of Hurricane Katrina,
and voiced alarm at the swelling US budget deficit.
Breaking with tradition under which US presidents
mute criticisms of their successors, Clinton
said the Bush administration had decided to invade
Iraq "virtually alone and before UN inspections
were completed, with no real urgency, no
evidence that there were weapons of mass destruction."
The Iraq war diverted US attention from the war on
terrorism "and undermined the support that we
might have had," Clinton said in an interview
with an ABC's "This Week" programme.
Clinton said there had been a "heroic but so
far unsuccessful" effort to put together a constitution
that would be universally supported in Iraq.
The US strategy of trying to develop the Iraqi military
and police so that they can cope without US support "I
think is the best strategy. The problem is we may not
have, in the short run, enough troops to do that," said
Clinton.
On Hurricane Katrina, Clinton faulted the authorities'
failure to evacuate New Orleans ahead of the storm's
strike on August 29.
People with cars were able to heed the evacuation
order, but many of those who were poor, disabled or
elderly were left behind.
"If we really wanted to do it right, we would
have had lots of buses lined up to take them out," Clinton.
He agreed that some responsibility
for this lay with the local and state authorities,
but pointed the finger, without naming him, at the
former director of the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA).
FEMA boss Michael Brown quit in response to criticism
of his handling of the Katrina disaster. He was viewed
as a political appointee with no experience of disaster
management or dealing with government officials.
"When James Lee Witt ran FEMA, because he had
been both a local official and a federal official,
he was always there early, and we always thought about
that," Clinton said, referring to FEMA's head
during his 1993-2001 presidency.
"But both of us came out of environments with
a disproportionate number of poor people."
On the US budget, Clinton
warned that the federal deficit may be coming untenable,
driven by foreign wars, the post-hurricane recovery
programme and tax cuts that benefitted just the richest
one percent of the US population, himself included.
"What Americans need to understand
is that ... every single day of the year, our government
goes into the market and borrows money from other countries
to finance Iraq, Afghanistan, Katrina, and our tax
cuts," he said.
"We have never done this before.
Never in the history of our republic have we ever financed
a conflict, military conflict, by borrowing money from
somewhere else."
Clinton added: "We depend on Japan, China, the
United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia, and Korea primarily to
basically loan us money every day of the year to cover
my tax cut and these conflicts and Katrina. I don't
think it makes any sense." |
KEY WEST, Fla. -- Hotel workers
secured pool chairs and umbrellas, tourists boarded
buses out of town and lines of vehicles snaked out
of the lower Florida Keys as Tropical Storm Rita churned
toward the exposed island chain.
Rita, which strengthened Sunday into a tropical
storm with sustained winds of 50 mph, was forecast
to be in the Straits of Florida between the Keys
and northern Cuba on Monday, possibly as a Category
1 hurricane, forecasters said.
The entire Keys was under a hurricane warning. Rainfall
totals of 6 to 15 inches were possible in the Keys,
with 3 to 5 inches possible across southern Florida.
Storm surges of 6 to 8 feet above normal tide levels
were predicted to batter the Keys.
Officials issued evacuation orders Sunday for visitors
- but not residents - from the Seven Mile Bridge near
Marathon to Key West, including the Dry Tortugas.
"We're happy to get out of here before the storm
comes," said Joan Taylor, 73, of Midland Park,
N.J., who was planning to fly out of Key West on Monday.
The stream of vehicles leaving the Keys on Sunday
included RVs, cars towing boats and thousands of motorcycle
riders who left an annual gathering a day early. U.S.
1, the lone highway in the Keys, was packed.
Gov. Jeb Bush declared a state of
emergency for Florida, which gives the state authority
to oversee evacuations and activate the National Guard,
among other powers.
Despite the evacuation order, however, some hotels
and restaurants in Key West remained open, and few
businesses were boarded up Sunday night.
In the Bahamas, which could be struck by Rita first,
few on Mayaguana Island bothered to board their windows
or stock up on emergency supplies as they normally
would for a hurricane, said Earnel Brown, manager of
the Baycaner Beach Resort.
"I don't expect that much trouble," Brown
said. "I don't think we're going to have that
much damage from it."
At 2 a.m. EDT, Rita was centered about 275 miles
east-southeast of Nassau, Bahamas, and about 545 miles
east-southeast of Key West. It was moving to the west-northwest
near 10 mph, according to the National Hurricane Center.
Long-range forecasts showed the
system moving into the Gulf of Mexico late in the week
as a hurricane, then possibly approaching Mexico or
Texas.
But forecasters warned those across the U.S. southern
coast that long-term predictions are subject to large
errors. That means that areas
ravaged by Katrina should be watching the storm.
Rita is the 17th named storm of the
Atlantic hurricane season. That makes this season the
fourth busiest since record keeping began in 1851 -
21 tropical storms formed in 1933, 19 developed in
1995 and 1887 and 18 formed in 1969, according to the
hurricane center.
Four hurricanes struck Florida last year, killing
dozens of people and causing $19 billion in insured
losses in Florida. Hurricane Dennis brushed by the
Keys in July, flooding some Key West streets, toppling
trees and knocking out power, before slamming the Florida
Panhandle.
Florida was also hit this year by Hurricane Katrina.
Eleven people died there.
Farther out in the Atlantic, Hurricane
Philippe formed late Sunday well east of the Lesser
Antilles. At 11 p.m., Philippe had maximum sustained
winds near 75 mph, and was centered about 390 miles
east of the Leeward Islands and was moving to the north-northwest
near 8 mph.
The hurricane season started June 1 and ends Nov.
30. |
It has been one month and one week since I sat in
a ditch in Crawford, Tx. I can hardly believe it
when I think of it myself. So much has happened in
that time, and really, so little.
I got to Camp Casey III in Covington, La today, after
getting up at 3am to head for the airport. Now it is
3am the next day and we are driving in a car to try
and find a hotel to sleep anywhere around Jackson,
Miss. I was prepared to be shocked by what I saw in
Louisiana, but I guess one can never really fully prepare
for such devastation and tragedy. After living in a
country your entire life it is so difficult to see
such callous indifference on an immense scale. When
I reflect on how the mother of the imbecile who is
running our country said that the people who are in
the Astrodome are happy to be there, it angers me beyond
comparison. The people in LA who were displaced
have nice, if modest homes that are perfectly fine.
I wonder why the government made them leave at great
expense and uproot families who have been living in
their communities for generations.
After we arrived at Camp Casey III, we took the Veterans
for Peace "Impeachment Tour Bus" into New
Orleans after stopping at the distribution center to
pick up some supplies in Covington. The stench and
the destruction are unbelievable. I
saw some hurricane zones in the panhandle of Florida
last year that were pretty bad but that couldn't have
prepared me for this.
I saw in the paper that George Bush said the recovery
in the Gulf States would be "hard work." That's
what he said about sending troops to Iraq and looking
at the casualty reports everyday: "It's hard work." That
man has never known a day of hard work in his life. The
people on the ground in Covington scoffed at George's
little junket to Louisiana yesterday. He stayed
in the French Quarter and a Ward that weren't even
damaged a bit. The VFP took me to the city of Algiers
on the West Bank. The part of Algiers we went to was
very poor and black. The people of Algiers know what
hard work is.
Algiers had no flooding. All of the damage was from
winds. There are trees knocked over and shingles off
of roofs. There are signs blown over and there was
a dead body lying on the ground for 2 weeks before
someone finally came to get it. Even though Algiers
came through Katrina relatively unscathed, our federal
government tried to force (mostly successfully) the
people out of the community. Malik Rahim, a new friend
of ours and resident of Algiers, told us stories of
the days after the hurricane. The
government declared martial law, but there was no effective
police presence to enforce it. Malik said the lawlessness
was rampant. People were running out of food
and water and they were being forced to go to the Superdome.
They didn't want to go to the Superdome, because their
homes were pretty intact: they wanted to stay and have
food and water brought to them. A town of 76,000 people
dwindled down to 3,000. The die hards were rewarded
last Wednesday when the VFP rolled into town with food
and water. The Camp Casey III
people were the first ones to bring any relief to Algiers.
The people who were supposed to look after its citizens,
our government, failed them.
In Algiers, in the space of 2 short weeks, Malik and
his community has opened a clinic which also doubles
as a food and supply distribution center. We need more
help in Algiers. Malik and the other dozens of fine
volunteers are planning on opening 2 more clinics in
Algiers and Malik would dearly love someone to give
him a flat bottomed boat so he can go to the flood
drenched poor communities that still have not been
helped and bring them food, supplies, and medical attention.
Medical professionals are dearly needed. Malik has
also set up a communications center in an apartment
next to his house which is for the community to use.
The aid that is being given in Algiers is completely
driven by the needs of the community. They have a saying
in Algiers: Not Charity, Solidarity.
The citizens of Algiers desperately needed help and
hope before the hurricane. When I think of how many
other poor neighborhoods are being decimated and made
so desperate and hopeless by the failed policies of
the Bush administration, it makes me so angry. But
when I see what the people of Algiers are doing to
help themselves and the people of America are doing
to help them help themselves, it gives me hope. I
think Algiers can be a model for all of our communities.
One thing that truly troubled me about my visit to
Louisiana was the level of the military presence there.
I imagined before that if the military had to be used
in a CONUS (Continental US) operations that they would
be there to help the citizens: Clothe them, feed them,
shelter them, and protect them. But
what I saw was a city that is occupied. I saw soldiers
walking around in patrols of 7 with their weapons slung
on their backs. I wanted to ask one of them what it
would take for one of them to shoot me. Sand bags were
removed from private property to make machine gun nests.
The vast majority of people who were looting in New
Orleans were doing so to feed their families or to
get resources to get their families out of there. If
I had a store with an inventory of insured belongings,
and a tragedy happened, I would fling my doors open
and tell everyone to take what they need: it is only
stuff. When our fellow citizens
are told to "shoot to kill" other fellow
citizens because they want to stay alive, that is military
and governmental fascism gone out of control. What
I saw today in Algiers lifted up my spirits, but what
I also saw today in Algiers frightened me terribly.
The people who are running the clinic in Algiers gave
me a list of desperately needed supplies:
- Blood pressure medication---properly packaged.
- Allergy medication---properly packaged
- Vitamin B
- Pens, paper, sharpies, index cards
- Glucometers and test strips
- Full O2 tanks
- Power strips and extension cords
- Non-DEET insect repellent
- Mini bottles of Hand Sanitizer
- A copy machine is urgently needed
- People: Call: 512-297-1049
Send supplies to:
Fed Ex or UPS
Veterans for Peace Ch 116
C/O 645 Kimbro Dr.
Baton Rouge, La. 70808
Mark them: For the Medical Clinic in Algiers
The children in Algiers have also been out of school.
Malik would like to open a school and they need school
supplies and teachers.
I have a testimony from a doctor that came to Louisiana
to help that I will post tomorrow. The failure in every
level of our government is criminal negligence. Tens
of thousands of families in our country have been devastated
because of the incompetence and callousness of our
so-called leadership. America is stepping up to the
plate to help Americans. America stepped up to the
plate to hold George accountable for the abomination
in Iraq. One thing George has
taught us is that we are self-sufficient and we have
a country that is worth fighting for and we are not
going away.
I was told that Pat Boone was on a conservative radio
talk show in San Francisco (yes they do exist) with Melanie
Morgan (who has a vendetta against me) and he told the
listeners that after we "stole the supplies" from
the Red Cross, we gave them to the "enemies of America
who are like the people who want to fly airplanes into
our buildings." Boone
says that we were giving them to enemies of America,
because we were distributing the supplies from a Mosque.
First of all, accusing me of stealing is slander, I think,
and second of all: we were helping Americans. Just because
their government abandoned them, we shouldn't feed them
and give them medicine and supplies? I thought Pat Boone
was supposed to be a Christian man? Thirdly, isn't Freedom
of Religion one of our Constitutional guarantees?
It is a Christ-like principle to feed the hungry, clothe
the naked, and shelter the homeless. That's what is
happening in Algiers and other places in Louisiana...but
by the people of America, not the so-called "Christians" in
charge. If George Bush truly
listened to God and read the words of the Christ, Iraq
and the devastation in New Orleans would have never
happened.
I don't care if a human being is black, brown, white,
yellow or pink. I don't care if a human being is Christian,
Muslim, Jew, Buddhist, or pagan. I don't care what
flag a person salutes: if a human being is hungry,
then it is up to another human being to feed him/her. George
Bush needs to stop talking, admit the mistakes of his
all around failed administration, pull our troops out
of occupied New Orleans and Iraq, and excuse his self
from power. The only way
America will become more secure is if we have a new
administration that cares about Americans even if they
don't fall into the top two percent of the wealthiest. |
WASHINGTON - President Bush's
push to give the military a bigger role in responding
to major disasters like Hurricane Katrina could lead
to a loosening of legal limits on the use of federal
troops on U.S. soil.
Pentagon officials are reviewing
that possibility, and some in Congress agree it needs
to be considered.
Bush did not define the wider role he envisions for
the military. But in his speech to the nation from
New Orleans on Thursday, he alluded to the unmatched
ability of federal troops to provide supplies, equipment,
communications, transportation and other assets the
military lumps under the label of "logistics."
The president called the military "the
institution of our government most capable of massive
logistical operations on a moment's notice."
At question, however, is how far to push the military
role, which by law may not include actions that can
be defined as law enforcement - stopping traffic, searching
people, seizing property or making arrests. That prohibition
is spelled out in the Posse Comitatus Act of enacted
after the Civil War mainly to prevent federal troops
from supervising elections in former Confederate states.
Speaking on the Senate floor Thursday,
Sen. John Warner, R-Va., chairman of the Armed Services
Committee, said, "I believe the time has come
that we reflect on the Posse Comitatus Act." He
advocated giving the president and the secretary of
defense "correct standby authorities" to
manage disasters.
Presidents have long been reluctant to deploy U.S.
troops domestically, leery of the image of federal
troops patrolling in their own country or of embarrassing
state and local officials.
The active-duty elements that Bush did send to Louisiana
and Mississippi included some Army and Marine Corps
helicopters and their crews, plus Navy ships. The main
federal ground forces, led by troops of the 82nd Airborne
Division from Fort Bragg, N.C., arrived late Saturday,
five days after Katrina struck.
They helped with evacuations and performed search-and-rescue
missions in flooded portions of New Orleans but did
not join in law enforcement operations.
The federal troops were led by Lt. Gen. Russel Honore.
The governors commanded their National Guard soldiers,
sent from dozens of states.
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld is reviewing
a wide range of possible changes in the way the military
could be used in domestic emergencies, spokesman Lawrence
Di Rita said Friday. He said
these included possible changes in the relationship
between federal and state military authorities.
Under the existing relationship, a state's governor
is chiefly responsible for disaster preparedness and
response.
Governors can request assistance from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency. If federal armed forces
are brought in to help, they do so in support of FEMA,
through the U.S. Northern Command, which was established
in 2002 as part of a military reorganization after
the 9/11 attacks.
Di Rita said Rumsfeld has not made recommendations
to Bush, but among the issues he is examining is the
viability of the Posse Comitatus Act. Di
Rita called it one of the "very archaic laws" from
a different era in U.S. history that limits the Pentagon's
flexibility in responding to 21st century domestic
crises.
Another such law, Di Rita said, is the Civil War-era
Insurrection Act, which Bush could have invoked to
waive the law enforcement restrictions of the Posse
Comitatus Act. That would have enabled him to use either
National Guard soldiers or active-duty troops - or
both - to quell the looting and other lawlessness that
broke out in New Orleans.
The Insurrection Act lets the president call troops
into federal action inside the United States whenever "unlawful
obstructions, combinations or assemblages - or rebellion
against the authority of the United States - make it
impracticable to enforce the laws" in any state.
The political problem in Katrina was that Bush would
have had to impose federal command over the wishes
of two governors - Kathleen Blanco of Louisiana and
Haley Barbour of Mississippi - who made it clear they
wanted to retain state control.
The last time the Insurrection Act was invoked was
in 1992 when it was requested by California Gov. Pete
Wilson after the outbreak of race riots in Los Angeles.
President George H.W. Bush dispatched about 4,000 soldiers
and Marines.
Di Rita cautioned against expecting quick answers
to tough questions like whether Congress should define
when to trigger the president's authority to send federal
troops to take charge of an emergency, regardless of
whether a governor agreed.
"Is there a way to define a threshold, or an
anticipated threshold, above which a different set
of relationships would kick in?" Di Rita asked. "That's
a good question. It's only been two weeks, so don't
expect us to have the answers. But those are the kinds
of questions we need to be asking." |
NEW ORLEANS - The mayor of New
Orleans has set up an "extremely problematic" timeline
for allowing residents to return to the evacuated city,
which is still threatened by a weakened levee system,
a lack of drinkable water and heavily polluted floodwaters,
the head of the federal relief effort said Saturday.
Coast Guard Vice Adm. Thad Allen said federal officials
have worked with Mayor Ray Nagin and support his
vision for repopulating the city, but he called Nagin's
idea to return up to 180,000 people to New Orleans
in the next week both "extremely ambitious" and "extremely
problematic."
"Our intention is to work with the mayor ...
in a very frank, open and unvarnished manner," Allen
told The Associated Press in an interview at Department
of Homeland Security headquarters in Baton Rouge.
Nagin has announced that the city's Algiers section,
the Garden District and the French Quarter would reopen
over the next week and a half, bringing back more than
one-third of the city's half-million inhabitants. All
the areas to be reopened were spared Katrina's flooding.
Electricity and clean water have been restored to some
sections.
Allen said a prime public health concern is the tap
water, which in most of the city remains unfit for
drinking and bathing. He said he was concerned about
the difficulties of communicating the risk of using
that water to people who return and might run out of
the bottled water they brought along.
"The water that's there is only good for firefighting
and flushing," he said.
Another concern, Allen said, was the risk of another
storm hitting the region, threatening an already delicate
levee system and possibly requiring residents to be
evacuated again.
"Something less than a Category 4 storm is going
to present significant issues that might require the
evacuation of the general population. You want to make
sure you have your arms around how you will do that," he
said.
Allen called on the mayor to be "mindful of
the risks" and said he would inform Nagin of his
concerns when they meet on Monday.
Allen was not the only official with doubts about
the mayor's plans.
The mayor's homeland security director, Terry Ebbert,
backed away from Nagin's promise on Friday, saying
only that the city would assess the situation in the
French Quarter from "day to day." Asked repeatedly
whether that meant it could open sooner or later than
Sept. 26, he declined to elaborate.
Ebbert said the city's recovery depends on getting
businesses reopened, but he said the repopulation of
the city was being done "in a progressive manner" to
ensure the safety and health of residents. A dusk-to-dawn
curfew was planned.
Meanwhile, some business owners were being allowed
back into the city Saturday to get a head start on
opening the rollicking bars, stores and restaurants
that keep the good times rolling in New Orleans.
Margaret Richmond stood watching, tears streaming
down her face, as members of the 82nd Airborne Division
used a crowbar to try to pry open the door of her looted
antiques shop on the edge of the city's upscale Garden
District.
The store, Decor Splendide, had been looted in the
chaotic days after Katrina struck. Antique jewelry,
a cement angel with one wing broken off and lamps were
lying scattered on the floor. Someone had wedged a
piece of metal in the door to jam it closed, hoping
to deter other looters.
"What they didn't steal they trashed," Richmond
said, gazing through a window of her shop, before the
soldiers were able to break open the door. "They
got what they could and ruined what they left."
Business owners, facing damage that could take months
to repair, said hopes for a quick recovery may be little
more than a political dream.
"I don't know why they
said people could come back and open their businesses," said
Richmond, whose insurance policy will cover the lost
merchandise. "You can't reopen this. And even
if you could, there are no customers here." [...]
These neighborhoods were the lucky ones. They never
flooded. Still, nearly three
weeks after Hurricane Katrina, about 40 percent of
the Big Easy was under water.
But that is down from 80 percent after the storm,
and engineers say water is dropping rapidly. While
water in some low-lying areas had been as deep as 20
feet, the deepest water in the city Friday was 5 feet,
exposing still more of the dead.
The death toll along the Gulf Coast
rose to 816, including 579 in Louisiana.
Security will be tight in the reopened neighborhoods,
with Nagin and others vowing never again to let New
Orleans slip into the lawlessness that gripped the
city in the days after the storm. This week, he warned
potential looters that soldiers carry M-16 rifles "and
they might have a few bazookas we're saving for spec
people." |
NEW YORK - British Prime Minister
Tony Blair has complained privately to media tycoon
Rupert Murdoch that the BBC's coverage of Hurricane
Katrina carried an anti-American bias, Murdoch said
at a conference here.
Murdoch, chairman of the media conglomerate News
Corporation, recounted a conversation with the British
leader at a panel discussion late Friday hosted by
former president Bill Clinton.
"Tony Blair -- perhaps I shouldn't repeat this
conversation -- told me yesterday that he was in Delhi
last week. And he turned on the BBC world service to
see what was happening in New Orleans," Murdoch
was quoted as saying in a transcript posted on the
Clinton Global Initiative website.
"And he said it was just full
of hate of America and gloating about our troubles.
And that was his government. Well, his government-owned
thing," he said of the publicly owned broadcaster.
Murdoch went on to say that anti-American
bias was prevalent throughout Europe.
"I think we've got to do a better job at answering
it. And there's a big job to do. But you're not going
to ever turn it around totally," said Murdoch,
one of three media magnates who spoke at Clinton's "Global
Initiative" forum on peace and development.
The former US president, who held his conference
to coincide with the United Nations summit in New York,
agreed that the BBC's coverage was lacking.
While the BBC's reports on the hurricane were factually
accurate, its presentation was "stacked up" to
criticize President George W Bush's handling of the
disaster, Clinton said.
"There is nothing factually inaccurate. But
... it was designed to be almost exclusively a hit
on the federal response, without showing what anybody
at any level was doing that was also miraculous, going
on simultaneously in a positive way," Clinton
said.
Blair's remarks, as reported by Murdoch, are sure
to aggravate the already difficult relations between
the prime minister's government and the BBC. [...]
A former BBC foreign correspondent
and MP, Martin Bell, defended the BBC's coverage of
the hurricane and alleged that Blair was trying to
curry favor with a powerful media owner who controls
important British newspapers.
"Tony Blair was telling Murdoch
what he wanted to hear because he needs Murdoch's support," Bell
was quoted as saying by British media.
The BBC said it had received no complaint from Downing
Street about its coverage.
Blair's office declined to comment. |
WASHINGTON - The leaders of the
House Intelligence Committee want CIA Director Porter
Goss to provide a public version of his agency's hard-hitting
report on the failures leading up to Sept. 11, 2001.
In a letter made public Friday, Intelligence Chairman
Peter Hoekstra, R-Mich., and the panel's top Democrat,
California Rep. Jane Harman, asked Goss to reveal
as much of the report from his inspector general
as possible.
"We believe the public has a right to know if
people should be held accountable for those failures
as a result of gross negligence or misconduct," Hoekstra
and Harman wrote on Sept. 6. "More importantly,
the public also should know what steps should be taken
in the future for the CIA to address the findings of
the report."
Spanning hundreds of pages, the report calls for disciplinary
reviews for former CIA Director George Tenet and current
and former officials who were involved in faulty intelligence
efforts before the attacks.
The report was sent to Congress last month. Limited
details have been provided by anonymous officials.
"The office of the inspector general developed
this report over two years. During that same time period,
much has been done at CIA and throughout the intelligence
community to improve and reform the way we do business," agency
spokeswoman Jennifer Millerwise Dyck said.
She would not comment further on whether the report
would be declassified.
Senate Intelligence Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kan.,
has also sent a letter to Goss requesting the report's
declassification. An aide declined to provide a copy
of the correspondence.
A spokeswoman for the Senate committee's top Democrat,
West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller, said he supports
Roberts' request.
Such bids for disclosure could
put Goss in a tight spot. As
a chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, he
helped lead a congressional inquiry into the attacks
and requested the inspector general's investigation. However,
a public report could attract more negative attention
to the agency, which has come under fire for 9/11
and the prewar intelligence on Iraq. |
UNITED NATIONS - Venezuela's
President Hugo Chavez used the United Nations on Thursday
to fire a broadside at the United States, saying the
world body should move out of New York over the war
in Iraq.
In a speech to the U.N. world summit, he also said
the United States had failed its own people in its
response to Hurricane Katrina, accused Washington
of fueling terrorism and faulted it for its doctrine
of pre-emptive military strikes.
"Today we know there were never
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq but despite that,
and going over the head of the United Nations, Iraq
was bombed and occupied. So the United Nations must
be pulled out of the United States," Chavez said.
The three-day New York summit was convened to mark
the United Nations' 60th birthday by laying out a plan
for multilateral action in the new century on terrorism,
human rights, development, peacebuilding and U.N. management
reform.
Chavez branded the plan "illegal" for failing
to respect anti-poverty goals set by a U.N. summit
in 2000 and said the United Nations instead needed
drastic overhaul.
"The United Nations has outlived its model. It's
not just a question of bringing about reform. The 21st
century requires profound changes," he said.
Among changes he advocated were expansion
of the 15-nation U.N. Security Council, which has global
authority over matters of international peace and security;
strengthening the role of the secretary-general, and
eliminating the council veto granted the United States,
China, Russia, Britain and France.
Chavez noted bitterly that U.S. television evangelist
Pat Robertson, a strong supporter of President George
W. Bush who called for Washington to assassinate him,
remained a free man. Robertson later apologized for
his remark.
"This is an international crime, terrorism," Chavez
said.
Ties between the United States and Venezuela, the
world's No. 5 oil exporter, have been cool since Chavez
came to power in 1998, ushering in social reforms and
forging close ties with communist Cuba. |
WASHINGTON - Venezuelan President
Hugo Chavez said Friday he has documentary evidence
that the United States plans to invade his country.
Chavez, interviewed on ABC's "Nightline," said
the plan is called "Balboa" and involves
aircraft carriers and planes. A transcript of the
interview was made available by "Nightline."
He said U.S. soldiers recently went
to Curacao, an island off Venezuela's northwest coast.
He described as a "lie" the official U.S.
explanation that they visited Curacao for rest and
recreation.
"They were doing movements. They
were doing maneuvers," Chavez said, speaking through
a translator.
He added: "We are coming up with the counter-Balboa
plan. That is to say if the government of the United
States attempts to commit the foolhardy enterprise
of attacking us, it would be embarked on a 100-year
war. We are prepared." [...]
To prove U.S. intentions to invade Venezuela, Chavez
offered to send "Nightline" host Ted Koppel
maps and other documentation.
"What I can't tell you is how
we got it, to protect the sources, how we got it through
military intelligence," he said.
In the event of a U.S. invasion, Chavez said the United
States can "just forget" about receiving
any more oil from his country. |
The speech by Venezuelan President
Hugo Chavez in United Nations General Assembly on Thursday
turned into an anti-American show.
Chavez, who defined the US as a "terrorist
state" in his speech, said Washington does not
respect the UN General Assembly resolutions and asked
the organization, therefore, to leave this country.
Venezuelan president reminded some suggested Jerusalem
as the new place for the UN headquarters; he received
high applause in the middle of his speech.
As the world leaders were asked to speak for five
minutes and when Chavez kept talking, the presiding
diplomat passed him a note that his time was up.
The Venezuelan leader threw the note
on the floor and said, "If Bush could speak for
20 minutes at Wednesday's opening session, so can I," and
spoke for 20 minutes. At the end, Chavez's remarks
got the loudest applause of the summit. |
Your Excellencies, friends, good afternoon:
The original purpose of
this meeting has been completely distorted. The
imposed center of debate has been a so-called reform
process that overshadows the most urgent issues,
what the peoples of the world claim with urgency:
the adoption of measures that deal with the real
problems that block and sabotage the efforts made
by our countries for real development and life.
Five years after the Millennium Summit, the harsh
reality is that the great majority of estimated goals
- which were very modest indeed - will not be met.
We pretended reducing by half the 842 million hungry
people by the year 2015. At the current rate that
goal will be achieved by the year 2215. Who in this
audience will be there to celebrate it? That is only
if the human race is able to survive the destruction
that threatens our natural environment.
We had claimed the aspiration of achieving universal
primary education by the year 2015. At the current
rate that goal will be reached after the year 2100.
Let us prepare, then, to celebrate it.
Friends of the world, this takes us to a sad conclusion:
The United Nations has exhausted its model, and it
is not all about reform. The XXI century claims deep
changes that will only be possible if a new organization
is founded. This UN does not work. We have to say
it. It is the truth. These transformations – the
ones Venezuela is referring to - have, according
to us, two phases: The immediate phase and the aspiration
phase, a utopia. The first is framed by the agreements
that were signed in the old system. We do not run
away from them. We even bring concrete proposals
in that model for the short term. But the dream of
an ever-lasting world peace, the dream of a world
not ashamed by hunger, disease, illiteracy, extreme
necessity, needs-apart from roots - to spread its
wings to fly. We need to spread our wings and fly.
We are aware of a frightening neoliberal globalization,
but there is also the reality of an interconnected
world that we have to face not as a problem but as
a challenge. We could, on the basis of national realities,
exchange knowledge, integrate markets, interconnect,
but at the same time we must understand that there
are problems that do not have a national solution:
radioactive clouds, world oil prices, diseases, warming
of the planet or the hole in the ozone layer. These
are not domestic problems. As we stride toward a
new United Nations model that includes all of us
when they talk about the people, we are bringing
four indispensable and urgent reform proposals to
this Assembly: the first; the expansion of the Security
Council in its permanent categories as well as the
non permanent categories, thus allowing new developed
and developing countries as new permanent and non
permanent categories.
The second; we need to assure the necessary improvement
of the work methodology in order to increase transparency,
not to diminish it.
The third; we need to immediately
suppress - we have said this repeatedly in Venezuela
for the past six years - the veto in the decisions
taken by the Security Council, that elitist trace
is incompatible with democracy, incompatible with
the principles of equality and democracy.
And the fourth; we need to strengthen the role of
the Secretary General; his/her political functions
regarding preventive diplomacy, that role must be consolidated.
The seriousness of all problems calls for deep transformations.
Mere reforms are not enough to recover that "we" all
the peoples of the world are waiting for. More than
just reforms we in Venezuela call for the foundation
of a new United Nations, or as the teacher of Simón
Bolívar, Simón Rodríguez said: "Either
we invent or we err."
At the Porto Alegre World Social Forum
last January different personalities asked for the United
Nations to move outside the United States if the repeated
violations to international rule of law continue. Today we
know that there were never any weapons of mass destruction
in Iraq. The people of the United States have always been
very rigorous in demanding the truth to their leaders; the
people of the world demand the same thing. There were never
any weapons of mass destruction; however, Iraq was bombed,
occupied and it is still occupied. All this happened over
the United Nations. That is why we propose this Assembly
that the United Nations should leave a country that does
not respect the resolutions taken by this same Assembly. Some
proposals have pointed out to Jerusalem as an international
city as an alternative. The proposal is generous enough to
propose an answer to the current conflict affecting Palestine.
Nonetheless, it may have some characteristics that could
make it very difficult to become a reality. That is why we
are bringing a proposal made by Simón Bolívar,
the great Liberator of the South, in 1815. Bolívar
proposed then the creation of an international city that
would host the idea of unity.
We believe it is time to think about the creation of
an international city with its own sovereignty, with
its own strength and morality to represent all nations
of the world. Such international city has to balance
five centuries of unbalance. The headquarters of the
United Nations must be in the South.
Ladies and gentlemen, we are facing an unprecedented
energy crisis in which an unstoppable increase of energy
is perilously reaching record highs, as well as the
incapacity of increase oil supply and the perspective
of a decline in the proven reserves of fuel worldwide.
Oil is starting to become exhausted.
For the year 2020 the daily demand for oil will be
120 million barrels. Such demand, even without counting
future increments - would consume in 20 years what
humanity has used up to now. This means that more carbon
dioxide will inevitably be increased, thus warming
our planet even more.
Hurricane Katrina has been a painful example of the
cost of ignoring such realities. The warming of the
oceans is the fundamental factor behind the demolishing
increase in the strength of the hurricanes we have
witnessed in the last years. Let this occasion be an
outlet to send our deepest condolences to the people
of the United States. Their people are brothers and
sisters of all of us in the Americas and the rest of
the world.
It is unpractical and unethical to
sacrifice the human race by appealing in an insane manner
the validity of a socioeconomic model that has a galloping
destructive capacity. It would be suicidal to spread it and
impose it as an infallible remedy for the evils which are
caused precisely by them.
Not too long ago the President of the
United States went to an Organization of American States'
meeting to propose Latin America and the Caribbean to increase
market-oriented policies, open market policies - that is
neoliberalism - when it is precisely the fundamental cause
of the great evils and the great tragedies currently suffered
by our people: The neoliberal capitalism, the Washington
Consensus. All this has generated is a high degree of misery,
inequality and infinite tragedy for all the peoples on his
continent.
What we need now more than ever Mr. President is a
new international order. Let us recall the United Nations
General assembly in its sixth extraordinary session
period in 1974, 31 years ago, where a new International
Economic Order action plan was adopted, as well as
the States Economic Rights and Duties Charter by an
overwhelming majority, 120 votes for the motion, 6
against and 10 abstentions. This was the period when
voting was possible at the United Nations. Now it is
impossible to vote. Now they approve documents such
as this one which I denounce on behalf of Venezuela
as null, void and illegitimate. This document was approved
violating the current laws of the United Nations. This
document is invalid! This document should be discussed;
the Venezuelan government will make it public. We cannot
accept an open and shameless dictatorship in the United
Nations. These matters should be discussed and that
is why I petition my colleagues, heads of states and
heads of governments, to discuss it.
I just came from a meeting with President Néstor
Kirchner and well, I was pulling this document out;
this document was handed out five minutes before -
and only in English - to our delegation. This document
was approved by a dictatorial hammer which I am here
denouncing as illegal, null, void and illegitimate.
Hear this, Mr. President: if we accept this, we are
indeed lost. Let us turn off the lights, close all
doors and windows! That would be unbelievable: us accepting
a dictatorship here in this hall.
Now more than ever - we were saying - we need to retake
ideas that were left on the road such as the proposal
approved at this Assembly in 1974 regarding a New Economic
International Order. Article 2 of that text confirms
the right of states to nationalizing the property and
natural resources that belonged to foreign investors.
It also proposed to create cartels of raw material
producers. In the Resolution 3021, May, 1974, the Assembly
expressed its will to work with utmost urgency in the
creation of a New Economic International Order based
on - listen carefully, please - "the equity, sovereign
equality, interdependence, common interest and cooperation
among all states regardless of their economic and social
systems, correcting the inequalities and repairing
the injustices among developed and developing countries,
thus assuring present and future generations, peace,
justice and a social and economic development that
grows at a sustainable rate."
The main goal of the New Economic International Order
was to modify the old economic order conceived at Breton
Woods.
We the people now claim - this is the case of Venezuela
- a new international economic order. But it is also
urgent a new international political order. Let us
not permit that a few countries try to reinterpret
the principles of International Law in order to impose
new doctrines such as "pre-emptive warfare." Oh
do they threaten us with that pre-emptive war! And
what about the "Responsibility to Protect" doctrine?
We need to ask ourselves: Who is going to protect us?
How are they going to protect us?
I believe one of the countries that
require protection is precisely the United States. That was
shown painfully with the tragedy caused by Hurricane Katrina;
they do not have a government that protects them from the
announced nature disasters, if we are going to talk about
protecting each other; these are very dangerous concepts
that shape imperialism, interventionism as they try to legalize
the violation of the national sovereignty. The full respect
towards the principles of International Law and the United
Nations Charter must be, Mr. President, the keystone for
international relations in today's world and the base for
the new order we are currently proposing.
It is urgent to fight, in an efficient manner, international
terrorism. Nonetheless, we must not use it as an excuse
to launch unjustified military aggressions which violate
international law. Such has been the doctrine following
September 11. Only a true and close cooperation and
the end of the double discourse that some countries
of the North apply regarding terrorism, could end this
terrible calamity.
In just seven years of Bolivarian
Revolution, the people of Venezuela can claim important social
and economic advances.
One million four hundred and six thousand
Venezuelans learned to read and write. We are 25 million
total. And the country will - in a few days - be declared
illiteracy-free territory. And three million Venezuelans,
who had always been excluded because of poverty, are now
part of primary, secondary and higher studies.
Seventeen million Venezuelans - almost
70% of the population - are receiving, and for the first
time, universal healthcare, including the medicine, and in
a few years, all Venezuelans will have free access to an
excellent healthcare service. More than a million seven hundred
tons of food are channeled to over 12 million people at subsidized
prices, almost half the population. One million gets them
completely free, as they are in a transition period. More
than 700 thousand new jobs have been created, thus reducing
unemployment by 9 points. All of this amid internal and external
aggressions, including a coup d'etat and an oil industry
shutdown organized by Washington. Regardless of the conspiracies,
the lies spread by powerful media outlets, and the permanent
threat of the empire and its allies, they even call for the
assassination of a president. The only country where a person
is able to call for the assassination of a head of state
is the United States. Such was the case of a Reverend called
Pat Robertson, very close to the White House: He called for
my assassination and he is a free person. That is international
terrorism!
We will fight for Venezuela, for Latin American integration
and the world. We reaffirm our infinite faith in humankind.
We are thirsty for peace and justice in order to survive
as a species. Simón Bolívar, founding
father of our country and guide of our revolution swore
to never allow his hands to be idle or his soul to
rest until he had broken the shackles which bound us
to the empire. Now is the time to not allow our hands
to be idle or our souls to rest until we save humanity.
Translated by Néstor Sánchez |
He resides in Lebanon, deported
from his adopted home in Germany. Though the
injustice of his arrest and deportation has been cleared
by a German Court, he continues to live in a forced
separation from his German wife. He once was a prosperous
businessman, today his resources are dwindling and
his health is deteriorating. His name is Fadi Madi. What
was his crime? He attempted to organize an open
conference in his adopted country, Germany, to discuss
the problems now facing the Muslim and Arab world.
Yes, the Thought Police are alive and well and
living throughout the world. The target du
jour is the Muslim-Islamic and Arab point of view. Examples
are wide-spread and growing of persecution and even
arrest for raising money for Islamic-based charities
that deal with the plight of displaced and occupied
Arab populations, writings that expose the injustice,
and most taboo of all – discussion involving
resistance tactics that attempt to secure a just
peace. Fadi Madi was captured within the oppressor's
drag-net as part of the so-called global war on terrorism. He
now fears for his life though he prides himself on
saving lives, not plotting to take them.
Yes, Fadi Madi is not alone in his dilemma. Not
too long ago I attended a supper of the New England
chapter of Sabeel, the organization of Ecumenical Liberation
Theology which boasts Catholic, Episcopalian, Presbyterian,
Congregationalist and a host of other main-stream religious
affiliations. Under discussion was their last
conference, held in Massachusetts, where they were
turned into Homeland Security for daring to discuss
the horrors associated with the Occupation of Palestine
and peaceful resistance tactics such as divestment
from Israel. In that instance no-one was arrested,
perhaps because conference attendees included WASPs
(White Anglo-Saxon Protestants) of prominence in their
communities. Yes, even in America where free
speech is a guarantee, intimidation tactics are rampant
and growing.
Last year I wrote an article that began, "Like
a carrier pigeon landing on my windowsill, Fadi Madi
suddenly appeared in my in-box bearing an urgent message
with the subject heading: ‘Struggle with Fadi
Madi.'" On September 14, 2005, I received
another email but this time it was from his wife, Rabia,
asking me to write a follow-up article.
The original message I received a year ago was addressed "TO
ALL MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS FREEDOM FIGHTERS - ANTI
WAR MOVMENTS - PEACE HUMANITY JUSTICE MOVMENTS." According
to the email, Fadi Madi had planned and advertised
an Arab-Islamic conference in Berlin (Germany) and
for this activity was arrested, detained, severely
beaten and sent back to his native country Lebanon,
despite his German citizenship based on his marriage
to a German wife. I had no knowledge of Fadi
Madi prior to the email and to this day have no idea
how he obtained my email address. But after conducting
a Google media search I was impressed by his credentials
as someone who had managed the release of several Japanese
captured by resistance forces in Iraq, and so I decided
to further publicize his plight.
It was clear that the title of his conference, "International
Movement against American and Zionist Globalization
and Supremacy" had triggered his downfall. I
also discovered an interesting article published
by The Daily Star out of Beirut. "The
Web site for the conference posts the declaration
of what it calls the Berlin Call 2004, describing
American and Israeli occupation of Arab land as terrorist
and barbaric," Cilina Nasser, the reporter for
the Daily Star reported. "We say a clear
and loud 'no' to colonialism, slavery, Zionism, racism,
imperialism and American hegemony," said the
Call. "We say a clear and loud 'yes' to the
liberation of all occupied territories and countries
struggling against the American-Zionist hegemony
and occupation," it stated. "Although
the statement mentions a call for establishing a ‘worldwide
popular resistance movement for freedom and independence
and for a just peace,' it does not specify the methods
of such a resistance and whether it supports a military
campaign to fulfill its goals," Nasser stated. "The
Call also aims at establishing an Islamic-European
dialogue to secure and strengthen the rights of Arab
and Muslim communities in Europe.
According to Fadi's German wife, Rabia, she recently
was made aware of my article as it appeared in the
online newspaper, Scoop NZ last October. In her
first email to me she wrote, "I am his wife, still
waiting, that he may come back after even our highest
court decided, that he didn't do anything wrong and
criminal and that he is no terrorist. But that
is not enough for politicians and what they (are) doing
at the moment is to refuse the Court appointment in
his case to come back. It was said, not before
2006."
Rabia wrote that "he is still sitting in Beirut
and waiting and cannot work or do anything. Still he
tries to raise his voice for the oppressed but he is
himself in bad condition now. With this he is
not alone in our western societies. Just in Germany
they are not following the law anymore. They are fighting
Muslims wherever they can. Close schools, send people
away who didn't do any wrong. But that is the old racism
in this country nothing more."
Rabia Madi is German by birth and converted to Islam
eight years ago. She married Fadi about five
years ago. "I was political active in my
young years until I realized that it is a dirty business," she
emailed me. She wrote that for many years she "lived
a typical life of successful businesswoman and spent
a lot of money, not thinking much about others."
Mrs. Madi was a real estate agent. It was from
this perspective that she came to realize that her
fellow Germans are not ready for foreigners and still
afraid of what they perceive to be strange things and
cultures. "It is very difficult to find a landlord
who accepts a colored person or foreign person from
Africa, Afro-Americans or people from Turkey.
Most people want only Germans in their flats," she
commented.
According to Rabia, "The racism in Germany as
well as anti-Semitism is very high." It
is her belief that racism in her country "is
more the fear of foreign culture." This
attitude makes her feel ashamed. But before
she converted to Islam, before she "came to know
from this side many different people from different
cultures I was the same. I didn't know much about others
and I didn't think at all about problems in Palestine
or elsewhere. I just didn't know," she wrote. "Now
I know that there are many different cultures, but
when you come to know a single person from any place
in this world, we all have the same ideas, little problems
or wishes as everyone in this world. We are not really that
different."
She went on to explain that in Germany there are
many people who have emigrated from Turkey to find
work, but they have no chance to truly integrate into
German society because even when it comes to finding
a home they are relegated to the worst flats which "no
German would take." But what is worse they
are forced to pay a lot of money for rent. As
a result ghettos developed. But as long as they lived
there without causing any trouble, "it was ok.
We say here ‘Ahmed my vegetable seller may stay,
the others can go home.' Rabia claims that typically
Germans have only accepted foreigners as workers. This
has held true even when it involved a professor from
the "Max Planck Institute or a manager from big
firm, it was the same. Even from states of European
Union, from Italy or Spain. Now at least that
has changed a bit, because no one wants to tell, that
he doesn't want any foreigner, even Europeans," she
wrote. "But still some people make advertisement,
that they only want German tenants, although that is
forbidden."
Rabia noted that when she first became a Muslim she
spoke openly about Islam and was engaged in activities
in the years 1998 to 2000. At that time she believed
that people were interested in hearing about the religion
and of people from other cultures and many participated
in multicultural events. It was possible to
wear a hijab and to walk freely on streets without
encountering people who responded to her with angry
looks. However, as has been said so many times, "after
9/11 it changed a lot. In the first weeks and
months after that, it was really dangerous to go as
a woman alone with hijab." Eventually things
got better. "But now people look angry at
you, they don't accept Muslims anymore." She
now wonders if the former openness was merely a pretense,
otherwise how could such a change occurred?
"It is frustrating to see, that all attempts
to start dialogue was just worth nothing. It
was only on the surface, that people seemed to change,
to learn about foreigners and to accept them," Rabia
stated. "What before was not possible to
say in public about foreigners, is now all possible,
if they are not Jewish. Judges who should be neutral
just tell you that they are against foreigners. I
had some policemen who had been looking for flats,
but only houses without foreigners there. This
would be incredible for other countries, but in Germany
it will never change I guess," she admitted. "It
is the same problem as we had before. We only thought
it has changed, but that is not true." Today
it is possible again to state clearly that you don't
like foreigners. Rabia believes this is due
to the media and the politicians who create fear of
foreigners. "But it is not only against
Muslims I would say. It is the same for Africans, for
Serbs, Croatians etc."
As
for her 44 year old husband, Fadi Madi, he was the
chairman of the trade company ULFIT, United Lebanese
Finance and International Trade and spent many
years working from Kuwait and later from the USA, first
in Michigan, then New York. He dealt with financial
interests of large trade companies in financing business
between companies and countries. His last projects
had been "in preparation between a government
and bank about a big area for hotels at the seaside
of that country, an electrician factory in Sudan and
a hospital in an African country." He had
tried to find a bank in Europe for the projects, but
they involved long term negotiations. "All
has stopped through that act from Germany," Fadi's
wife charged. "Also the trust is damaged of course,
because his clients don t know what is the truth."
Fadi had also worked from Switzerland, Sweden, Kuwait,
and France as well as the United States before he came
to Germany.
"He is Muslim, but very open minded and correct
with everyone," Rabia said in defense of her husband. "He
is straight in his opinion and not belonging to any
group. There had been offers from different groups
and states to work for them, but he never gave up his
responsibility for his own mind and actions. He
pays a high price for that, but he wouldn't change
that." Rabia believes that it was Fadi's independence
that positioned him to successfully negotiate for the
release of the Japanese held hostage in Iraq. "But
he never made big thing out of this," she wrote.
"Now to the case of my husband," Rabia
continued. "Fadi was living in NY as a financial
broker before we got married. He was a businessman. I
didn't want to live in the USA so he came to Germany." After
arriving in Germany he started his company but never
forgot his people in South Lebanon, the place of his
birth and wanted to help as much as he could while
remaining outside of Lebanon. After Israel left
South Lebanon he even was asked to run for parliament,
but it didn't work and he came back to Germany. He
was in business with Arab financial projects, for example
big projects to built infrastructure in African countries
or hospitals and those things. But after 9/11
it was not possible for him to work in this field,
because no one wanted to invest in Arab countries or
vise versa no Arab wanted to keep his money in UK or
USA. So it was quite a hard time, but he is one
who never complains and so he spent more time for the
struggle in Palestine and later in Iraq," Rabia
stated.
Fadi took part in many conferences and meetings around
the world and from this experience came up with a plan
to organize a "congress." The conference
was to have taken place last year in Germany, Rabia
wrote. He even believed that German politicians
would support him. Rabia admits that his thinking
was naive. The case against him developed from
a media attack on the conference orchestrated by the
Jewish Simon Wiesenthal Centre and their request to
Germany's Interior Minister to stop the congress, because "it
would only be a meeting of terrorists. There
had been some politicians and activists and well known
people who wanted to join," but the minister used
that politically, she claimed.
"They stopped him at the airport and didn't
allow him to enter Germany. They didn't allow him to
see a lawyer, who was waiting in airport and they treated
him bad. Fadi also has serious health problems
which were made worse by his detention. "He had
no witnesses to prove that all what he said afterwards
was like that, but we know, that the police in airport
treats foreigners very bad. We had even some cases
where people died there. He is a very straight
person, so he didn't accept to stop his activities
and political work and they expelled him," Rabia
stated. "My husband did all this not
as a Muslim, but as an activist for peace. He is Muslim
but not a fundamentalist." Rabia claims
that his fault is that he doesn't understand German
and he hadn't sufficiently realized that the mood in
Germany had changed and that Muslims and Arabs no longer
had "good cards" to play in such an atmosphere.
The day after Fadi was detained at the airport, German
officials prohibited the congress from opening, despite
the fact that the other organizers had already canceled
it. Some wanted to start a criminal investigation
against him. "But our highest court decided,
that his website didn't contain any criminal parts," furthermore
the attorney general was not permitted to start a criminal
investigation and was forbidden to search in his personal
things and papers. Although our highest court found
him innocent, he is still in Lebanon because the court,
who has to decide in foreigner affairs whether he may
come back" has informed them that a decision will
not be made this year. "The German law says clearly,
that he has the right to come to his wife," she
claimed. "But they just put the case away
to let him wait. We tried to get him in as an
urgent case because we need to live together and
because he needs medical treatment. The judge refused
that and told us that this even would make him think
not to let him in anymore because of his health, because
he only would use the social system. But we
are paying a lot of money for this social system and
it is our right to use it, as the judge will do himself."
"We have a lot of illegal police actions in
mosques every week now. Secretly police tell us that
it only done to show action and those mosques who fight
against in court still get the answer it was illegal,
but that doesn't help and media only report about the
actions not that it was wrong." Rabia also
claims that though he was exonerated by the highest
court, following the court decision, no statement has
been forthcoming that Fadi Madi is innocent, that he
did no wrong, and that he is not a terrorist.
As politicians score their political points no one
concerns themselves about the fate of innocent people
who are affected by the racism, Rabia complained. It
is not only hard for her to be separated from her husband, "he
cannot work or do anything from there. He cannot travel
to any European state." His personal life
has for all intents and purposes been stopped. Today
many foreigners have been sent out "without reasons
and asked to fight" against it from outside. "This
costs a lot of money and many lawyers say we cannot
take the case."
Postscript:
Following his wife's emails, Fadi contacted me to
say that what happened to him at the Berlin and Frankfurt
airports has made him so wary he is afraid to step
outside in Beirut even to buy cigarettes. He
fears that the Israeli Mossad is after him and may
want to kill him. This fear is based on what
happened to him due to his defense of the Palestinian
and Iraqi people, he claims. He is still very
shaken by the incident and asks how in Europe and especially
in Germany he could have been made to endure such horrific
treatment.
Fadi asserts that they first took "my holy book
Koran from my hand and they put (it) under the feet
of the inhuman lady who issued the statement to send
me back to Lebanon… after (that) they did all
bad things to me on my way to Beirut to take off all
my clothes and keep me naked in 10-degree temperature
in a very cold room at the airport." According
to Fadi they treated him like an animal and forced
him to collect his clothes by his teeth. He was
told that he could return to Germany if he made the
statement that "there is no occupation in Iraq
and Palestine. Madi states that authorities at
the airport allowed agents from Mossad and the US Army
to investigate and hurt him "to drop me more then
6 times from the chair to the floor… I ask to
see or talk with any lawyer but they refuse even to
(let me) talk with my wife." |
PARIS, Sept 18 - The "misunderstanding" that
has clouded Franco-US relations for the past three
years is "behind us," the American ambassador
to Paris told a Sunday newspaper here.
"There was a misunderstanding with France and
the French," Craig Stapleton told Le Journal
du Dimanche in remarks published in French, adding
that he was "sure that all that is behind us."
"It is true that our two governments have economic
and political disagreements, but the coordination and
work done together have helped overcome the differences," he
told the weekly, noting the French offer of aid to
help victims of Hurricane Katrina.
France and the United States "have the same values
and the same interests," said the envoy, who took
up his post in July.
French President Jacques Chirac led international opposition
to the US-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003. |
Germany is facing weeks of political
uncertainty after Sunday's election failed to produce
a clear winner.
Coalition talks will begin later this month - but
neither of the main parties is enthusiastic about the
idea of uniting in a "grand coalition".
Angela Merkel's conservative Christian Democrats
(CDU) got 35.2%, only three seats more than their main
rivals.
Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder has refused to admit
defeat after his Social Democrats (SPD) got 34.3%.
Both he and Mrs Merkel say they have a mandate to
be chancellor.
Mrs Merkel urged the SPD on Monday to "accept
that they are not the strongest party" and enter
talks on forming a broad coalition under her leadership.
But SPD chairman Franz Muentefering insisted that
Mr Schroeder had won the voters' trust and called on
other parties - apart from the new Left - to build
a new SPD-led coalition.
Pre-election opinion polls had suggested that Mrs
Merkel would be the clear winner.
The BBC's William Horsley in Berlin says a CDU-SPD "grand
coalition" could lead to instability or gridlock
as the two sides differ sharply over how to revive
Germany's economic fortunes.
Economic gloom
Investors' dismay was reflected in the markets on
Monday, with Frankfurt's benchmark Dax index losing
2% in early trading, and the euro down more than 1%
against the US dollar.
The campaign was dominated by concerns about the sluggish
economy and high unemployment.
European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso
urged German leaders on Monday to "find as soon
as possible a stable solution for Germany", because "without
a dynamic Germany, Europe cannot recover".
Mrs Merkel voiced disappointment with the result,
but insisted she was still on course to become the
country's first woman chancellor.
Meanwhile, Mr Schroeder said he could not understand
how the CDU "stakes a claim to political leadership
from a disastrous election result".
Coalition options
The CDU's intended coalition partner, the pro-business
Free Democrats (FDP), did well with 9.8%, giving them
61 seats. But that is not enough to secure a joint
majority.
German political experts are poring over a host of
other possible coalitions.
The Left party, newly formed from disenchanted SPD
members and former communists, took 8.7% (54 seats),
and the Greens, Mr Schroeder's coalition partner, won
8.1% (51 seats).
Turnout was 77.7%.
Results from a final seat in the city of Dresden
will be decided on 2 October, although that will not
tip the balance of power.
Voting was delayed there because of the death of
a candidate.
There is speculation about a possible "traffic
light" coalition - never tried before - between
the SPD, Greens and the FDP.
FDP leader Guido Westerwelle ruled that out on Sunday,
but he could face pressure to reconsider.
Meanwhile, a new left-wing coalition of the SPD,
Greens and Left party looks unlikely, commentators
say.
A coalition deal must be reached before 18 October,
the deadline for the new parliament to sit and choose
a new chancellor.
If there is no deal, the only way out would be a
fresh election.
The CDU slumped from a 20-point lead in opinion polls
when Mr Schroeder called an early election about six
weeks ago.
Germany's President, Horst Koehler, will be called
on to assist in the painful business of putting a coalition
together. |
The idea of a large sea on Saturn's
moon Titan was all but ruled out after the Cassini
mission found no evidence early in its mission.
But a new
image shows what scientists think is a shoreline
with bays and channels feeding liquid into a possible
sea.
Scientists have long speculated that Titan might contain
liquid methane or other hydrocarbons. The chemistry
resembles prebiotic Earth, but Titan lacks liquid water.
Nonetheless, earlier this month another group of researchers
speculated that Titan might actually harbor
life today.
"This radar data is among the most telling evidence
so far for a shoreline," said Steve Wall, radar
deputy team leader from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
Pasadena, Calif.
The image, released Friday, shows a distinct division
between a bright and apparently rough region and and
dark and smooth area.
"This is the area where liquid or a wet surface
has most likely been present, now or in the recent
past," Wall said. "Titan probably has episodic
periods of rainfall or massive seepages of liquid from
the ground."
"We also see a network of channels that run across
the bright terrain, indicating that fluids, probably
liquid hydrocarbons, have flowed across this region," said
Dr. Ellen Stofan, Cassini associate radar team member
from Proxemy Research in Laytonsville, Md.
Combined with other radar images taken on previous
Cassini passes of Titan, scientists have identified
two distinct types of drainage features. One type is
long and deep, suggesting fluids flowing over long
distances. Another is in a denser network that suggests
rainfall.
"It looks as though fluid flowed in these channels,
cutting deeply into the icy crust of Titan," said
Larry Soderblom with the U.S. Geological Survey in
Flagstaff, Ariz. "Some of the channels extend
over 100 kilometers [60 miles]. Some of them may have
been fed by springs, while others are more complicated
networks that were likely filled by rainfall."
More imaging is planned on future passes by the icy
moon. |
New Delhi - Two months before
Janmashtami, a fireball from the sky fell on the farm
of Mubeen in Bhuka village in west Rajasthan.
Being a blind, Mubeen, son of Ramdhan Sindhi, could
not see the fireball, caused by a meteorite, but
the event on June 25 was witnessed by his family
- members who saw a flash of light and cracking sound.
The bright tail was seen from Jodhpur, 110 km north-east
from Bhuka.
Next day, the meteorite was retrieved from the fields
and handed over to police. A further search could not
find out any more fragments.
The story could have ended there had it not been for
two Jodhpur-based researchers, Dr K L Srivastava and
Dr J Swadia from J N V University, who also caught
a glimpse of the trail.
They contacted other planetary scientists to find
out answers of a puzzling phenomenon - why on earth
the meteorites prefer a small area in western Rajasthan
as starting from 1991, there were seven observed fall
of meteorites in the same zone.
"This looks to me as very
significant. Earlier I used to think that it is statistical
variation but every new meteorite centred around
Jodhpur, makes me think that there is something unusual," Dr
Narendra Bhandari, who has just retired from the
Physical Research Laboratory (PRL) in Ahmedabad after
shaping the scientific goals for India's moon mission
and analysed the meteorite events, told Deccan Herald.
The other six meteorites fell in the zone at Didwana
(August 12, 1991), Lohawat (October 30, 1994), Devri
Khera (October 30, 1994), Piplia Kalan (June 20, 1996),
Itawa Bhopji (May 30, 2000) and Bhawad (June 6, 2002).
Since only about 126 falls have been
observed all over India in the past two centuries,
this frequency of fall - one in every two years - in
a small area of Rajasthan is anomalously high. In comparison,
only eight falls have been reported from the rest of
India during the past 15 years,
A major difference on June 25 last
was that the meteorite was an iron meteorite with high
iron content, unlike the six previous meteorites which
were stony. |
Victorian authorities believe
a man built up at least 30,000 volts of static electricity
in his jacket simply by walking around the western
Victorian city of Warrnambool yesterday.
The man left a trail of scorch marks and molten
plastic behind him.
It was yesterday afternoon when Frank Clewer walked
into a Warrnambool business and got his first shock.
"It sounded almost like a firecracker or something
like that," he said.
"It was at the reception area. Within say, around
five minutes, the carpet started to erupt," he
said.
Burns the size of 10-cent pieces were left on the
carpet where Mr Clewer had been standing.
The Country Fire Authority evacuated the building
and those around it, fearing the power could cause
larger electrical problems.
But Mr Clewer's worries continued when he got back
in his car.
"I actually scorched a piece of plastic I had
on the floor of the car," he said.
Scientist Karl Kruszelnicki says it is likely the
electrical build-up was caused by a number of factors,
such as the synthetic clothes the man was wearing.
"This poor guy has built up static electricity
thanks to an unfortunate combination of insulating
clothes that he's wearing, static, synthetic clothes,
just walking along and he's just building up this static
charge everywhere," Dr Kruszelnicki said.
"I've read of it but I've never heard of it here
in Australia."
The CFA has Mr Clewer's jacket and says it is continuing
to give off voltage. |
A minor earthquake shook Santa Cruz County and also
was felt in Santa Clara County just after midnight
Sunday, according to U.S. Geological Survey spokeswoman
Stephanie Hanna.
The 3.1-magnitude earthquake was centered 6 miles
north of Boulder Creek, just 15 miles south of San
Jose City Hall.
An aftershock with a magnitude of 1.2 hit the area
at 4:56 a.m.
The earthquake occurred in an area that is hit frequently
by minor earthquakes and is in the San Andreas Fault
zone, Hanna said. |
On the fourth
anniversary of the September 11th attacks, Laura Knight-Jadczyk
announces the availability of her latest book:
In the years since the 9/11 attacks, dozens of books
have sought to explore the truth behind the official
version of events that day - yet to date, none of
these publications has provided a satisfactory answer
as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately
responsible for carrying them out.
Taking a broad, millennia-long perspective, Laura
Knight-Jadczyk's 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth uncovers the true nature of
the ruling elite on our planet and presents new and
ground-breaking insights into just how the 9/11 attacks
played out.
9/11: The Ultimate
Truth makes a strong case for the idea that September
11, 2001 marked the moment when our planet entered
the final phase of a diabolical plan that has been
many, many years in the making. It is a plan developed
and nurtured by successive generations of ruthless
individuals who relentlessly exploit the negative
aspects of basic human nature to entrap humanity as
a whole in endless wars and suffering in order to
keep us confused and distracted to the reality of
the man behind the curtain.
Drawing on historical and genealogical sources, Knight-Jadczyk
eloquently links the 9/11 event to the modern-day
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. She also cites the clear
evidence that our planet undergoes periodic natural
cataclysms, a cycle that has arguably brought humanity
to the brink of destruction in the present day.
For its no nonsense style in cutting to the core
of the issue and its sheer audacity in refusing to
be swayed or distracted by the morass of disinformation
that has been employed by the Powers that Be to cover
their tracks, 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth can rightly claim to be THE
definitive book on 9/11 - and what that fateful day's
true implications are for the future of mankind.
Published by Red Pill Press
Scheduled for release on October 1,
2005, readers can pre-order the book today at our bookstore. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|