In our
latest podcast, (left to right) editors Henry See,
Scott Ogrin, and Joe Quinn chat with three guests,
from Mexico, Canada, and Australia, about the influence
of the USA on their countries.
Topics include the effects of the North American Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA) which is being offered as the
neo-liberal model for the rest of the world to follow,
Australian PM John Howard's new "anti-terror" laws,
the recent exposure of British SAS false flag operations
in Iraq, and the possible effects of Hurricane Rita.
If you have any questions for the Signs Team or would
like to suggest a topic for future Podcast discussion,
you can write us at:
If your only source
of the news was Fox, CNN, or the major networks, you'd
think that the people who stayed in New Orleans, whether
huddled up at the Superdome, the Convention Center, or
in their homes, were so devoid of initiative that they
simply sat on their bums waiting for the government to
come in and save them: exactly the image of the poor
that the media and the elite wish you to have. You know,
the welfare bums who have chosen to be lazy and not get
a job, preferring government handouts to the menial work
for minimum wage that gives your life value and promotes
self-esteem; the sort of people who will capitalise on
a disaster by looting in order to get all those gadgets
and goodies they aren't willing to earn themselves.
We have collected today some of the stories that have
appeared that show a different view of the survivors,
stories of people banding together and cooperating,
sharing resources and skills, in order to make it through
the aftermath of Katrina.
Peter Berkowitz is
a staff attorney at a Massachusetts prison. He was traveling
in New Orleans with his wife Bruni & son Ernesto
when the hurricane hit. They were there because Ernesto
was planning to start his freshman year at Loyola of
New Orleans. What follows is his letter to his 80-something
mother. It was forwarded to the PEACE-LIST at Syracuse
University by Carole Resnick <CaroleRes@msn.com>
on Wednesday, September 14, 2005.
95 5
Dear Mom:
This is pretty much what happened to us as far as I
can remember it. Some of it is probably off because we
lost track of time and days and nights blended. I'm still
feeling very angry and sad. Watching the news outrages
me. I see "Dr. Phil" opining on why people
didn't evacuate New Orleans. He says they didn't believe
there would be a hurricane, or they didn't want to leave,
etc. Well there was no way to leave. We had no way out.
People with families and no resources had no way out.
There were no buses coming for people, or shelters to
take people to. Just announcements to leave. So naturally,
the poorest, sickest, etc. were left behind. No one,
as far as I could see, wanted to be there or elected
to be there. No one really allowed them to get out!
Anyway, we began hearing hurricane news on the television.
By Saturday, we were hearing insanely frightening news
of a direct category 5 hurricane hit and projections
of massive flooding and deaths of up to 30,000 people.
Despite being through several hurricanes, this seemed
worse than imaginable. We were pretty scared. Bruni and
I had tickets out for Sunday, 828 at 2 pm so we weren't
worried. I called all the airlines and finally got Ernesto
a ticket to Chicago for 1 pm the next day.
Sunday morning we sent Ernesto back to school to get
his things. I called to check on my reservation and was
told the flight was cancelled. Bruni and I had no way
out. Ernesto's flight was never cancelled, but there
were no taxis, buses, etc., or any way to get to the
airport.
So we bought some wine and canned goods and waited out
the storm in the hotel. With all the dire predictions,
it was pretty nerve-wracking to wait. I don't remember
the storm too well. The winds picked up at night and
really roared during the day Monday morning. The electricity
went, but we had water. We watched the hurricane from
our room and from the lobby of our hotel. The two restaurants
attached to the hotel made coffee and sandwiches for
the guests. The bar was opened. Everyone cooperated,
so it was not nearly as bad as predicted. Being in the
city, the hotel was pretty well protected by other buildings.
It was not nearly as bad (or impressive) as the hurricanes
we passed in Cupey.
So everything was fine and we were just waiting for
the next day to see when the airport would open and when
we could get out. It was quite a relief.
Tuesday morning at about 8 am, the hotel people knocked
on our door to say we were evacuating the hotel immediately
for their sister hotel the Saint Marie. The wanted to
get all the guests together for protection from looters
at nighttime, because the Saint Marie had a generator,
and because it was 5 stories high, and there was lots
of talk of floods of up to 20 feet. So we left for the
Saint Marie, two blocks away. When we got there, we were
herded into the ballroom and told to stay there. As I
kept inquiring about our room, I was finally told there
were no rooms, that we could stay in the ballroom if
we wanted as the flood waters poured in, or we could
go to the official evacuation center at the Convention
Center. We were effectively kicked out of the hotel.
So we left with about 15 other guests and walked through
the streets, about 10 blocks to the Convention Center.
Water was clearly coming down the streets from the direction
of Lake Ponchartrain, and the flood news was terrible.
At the front door, the workers there told us to go around
to the side. At the side, we were informed that the Convention
Center was not an evacuation center, and that no one
was permitted inside.
There was no one else there except for our group. Our
concern at the moment was not to be caught up in the
flood. Behind the Convention Center ran the "Riverwalk",
a Mall and outside walkway along the Mississippi. Right
on the side of the Convention Center was an escalator
that ran up to a maybe 100 foot long covered walkway
that led into the Mall. The walkway was about thirty
feet high. We decided that it was the best place for
now to ride out the flood.
So we all went up and put down our bags. Ernesto and
I walked to the mall entrance, but the doors were locked.
We thought maybe moving into the mall might be better
and safer. At the very corner of the front windows to
the entrance to the Mall, we found a window shattered
on the bottom by the storm. I broke the rest of the window
out so we could walk in. The Mall was full of shops and
food and drink kiosks. We showed it to the other people
with us. Since it was hot inside the Mall and the people
were still afraid of getting in trouble for "trespassing",
they elected to camp outside.
We decided to stay all together as a group. Since we
had no food or water and no way to get any, we went into
the Mall and began "looting", gathering food
and water for our survival.
At this point, there was no communication with anyone.
No one knew what was happening. There were no police.
There was nothing other than news of terrible floods.
Everyone was on their own.
So now, with some food and water, we sat down to wait.
The entrance to the Riverwalk had part of the roof still
intact, so we were able to wait in the shade.
Shortly after, we noticed a man with
a rifle and duffel bag walk up to the door to the Mall.
We see him try the door and find it locked. Then he simply
smashed out the door with the butt of his rifle and walked
in. We, of course, decided to not enter again until he
left. Maybe half an hour later, he marched past us and
was gone. His duffel seemed a bit fuller.
We went in again and explored more, located where the
food was, found stores on a lower floor, etc. Some
time passed, and then the person with the rifle returns
again. This time we notice he is a cop, and he is with
four other cops, and they all have arms and duffel bags.
And their only purpose is to get whatever they can.
That really opened up the Mall for us. We gathered food,
drinks, and explored the stores. Some other tourists
appeared and joined us. We took chairs and tables out
of the mall. The police had "opened up"
Footlocker and other stores, so there were shoes and
clothes available for the taking. I wandered through
looking for bedding and ways to set up camp. I took the
covers off of some kiosks to use as a bed. Bruni found
some semi-cushioned furniture and we took cushions. One
day we found pillows in a store.
Our group grew as new people came looking for ways to
get out of the expected flooding. At some point, I started
to walk back to our hotel to find out if we could stay
there. On the way, I ran into an employee of the hotel
and her family who had also been kicked out of the hotel.
They came up and joined us as well.
The first night, there were about thirty of us up on
the bridge. The next day, some others arrived. I think
the second day, Wednesday, might be when the Convention
Center opened, because one family decided to move down
there. I think it was one of the families of the hotel
employees. They had been enjoying the provisions of the
Mall with us. Once they moved down to the Convention
Center, word spread, and there was a steady stream of
people coming up and sacking the Mall. People came out
with everything, as did we. More stores were broken into,
and people came out with bags and bags of goods. And
it spread and spread. We went in systematically all day
long taking out food and provisions.
During all of this, there were no police around. There
were no authorities around. There was no food. There
was no water. There was no information, other than the
hysteria and rumors from the radio. No one knew how long
we'd be there. No one knew when the floods would reach
us. The news indicates that the airport is under ten
feet of water, that the main shelter, the Superdome,
has lost part of its roof and is flooding, that there
is killing, and looting, and who knows what else. Everything
is rumor. No one knows anything. If
you see a cop, they are on their own. They are also homeless,
and if they talk to you, it is to say you are on your
own.
By Wednesday, the streets were filled with people who
are at the Convention Center. There are thousands of
people in the streets. No one has food or water. It is
hot and miserable. It was maybe Wednesday or Thursday
that some people on the street began yelling about dead
bodies, and tossed a body wrapped in a sheet on the side
of the Convention Center just below us. A little later
a wheelchair with a dead woman appears there as well.
Again, everything is rumor. People are saying that the
dead woman in the wheelchair was bludgeoned to death
in the Convention Center. At the same time, hordes of
people are coming up the steps past us and into the Mall.
They are breaking into all the stores, smashing cash
registers, etc. There is desperation all around. And
anger. And violence.
Our group is about 50. We are mostly tourists from the
US, Australia, England etc. There are also several families
from New Orleans who were flooded out who have joined
us. Two of the people are nurses. The bathrooms in the
mall have overflowed. There has been no water since Tuesday
night. Food is rotting. Everything smells, as do we.
But we are organized. We have set up buckets behind broken
pieces of zinc roofing as bathrooms. We have sodas and
water stacked up in our kitchen. While there is still
ice in the Mall, we have some hams buried there. We have
umbrellas and trash cans and trash bags ... even disposable
gloves to help avoid disease. We also have dead bodies,
dead rats, and shit and stink all around. And we have
no idea how long we are here for.
Our group is mostly white and
from Middle America. They decide that the blacks (the
Convention Center is 99% black obviously) are planning
to murder us to get attention and help). There is mass
hysteria in the group, and racism is rampant. People
don't know where to flee. Rumors are everywhere about
murder, rape, etc. There are shots during the
night Thursday or Friday. At 2 am, there is a huge
explosion across the river, and a huge fire. Smoke
pours in from fires in every direction.
There is some nasty racism in our group.
One day, when the hysteria is greatest, a black man stands
up and says, "Why do you think these people want
to kill you? They are surviving just the same as you.
Struggling just the same. Just as desperate as you. They
don't care anything about you. They are concentrating
on surviving, etc."
That calmed people a bit and made them feel particularly
foolish.
At the same time, more and more families
from the Convention Center were moving up to the walkway
with us. Our group grew to about 80. Each morning, people
began to bag the garbage. Others swept the walkway. Some
set out breakfast for everybody. Two women who were home
care workers for the elderly emptied and cleaned the
shit buckets. A group would go into the Mall and forage
for provisions. Then we would sit all day and wait.
I think on Friday the helicopters
began to arrive dropping water and MRE rations in the
parking lot in front of us. It was the first and only
food and water ever to arrive -- three days after the
hurricane. And it was just tossed from the helicopter
for people to run after and gather. The old and the
sick had nothing. Again, no one knew what was
happening. Fires were burning all around. Everyone
was desperate and frightened. Everyone was just trying
to survive. And everyone, other than us tourists, was
there because they had been completely wiped out --
had lost their homes and every possession and had young
kids and elderly parents to feed.
As the helicopters arrived, we also ran down and gathered
what we could. We began to survive on the army rations.
Ernesto and I became friendly with the man who had given
the speech chastising our group. He invited me to go
with him to the Convention Center and distribute whatever
Army rations we could pick up from the next helicopter
to the disabled there, since they had no way to get rations.
We gathered about 30 meals off of the next drop.
The drops were scandalous -- throwing
food and water out of a hovering helicopter -- people
scrambling for food to survive. Reduced to animals foraging
-- when the copters could have landed, imposed order
with guards, and distributed food with some respect and
humanity.
Anyway, we walked through the Convention Center distributing
food. The Center takes up about eight city blocks. There
must have been 25,000 people camped out there without
provisions, without bathrooms, without water or electricity
... with no means of survival. Families with little kids.
Old people. People in wheelchairs. There was no medicine.
No nurses or doctors. There was filth and garbage everywhere.
Some people asked for food, and we gave it. Others said
they were fine and had eaten. Some pointed out others
who needed food. Like our group,
they were doing their best to survive, and sharing whatever
they had. We kept walking. The crowds went on and on.
People with nothing. Every one of them had lost everything.
Abandoned. Not knowing how they would eat, how they would
survive. It was the most disgraceful, sad, infuriating
thing I had ever seen in my life. Poor people discarded
like garbage because they were poor people.
Everybody was waiting for the promised buses to evacuate
us. Every day there were rumors of buses. Every day we
waited and watched. Nothing ever came. Every day there
was more filth. More people fainting from dehydration.
Children were getting sick. Disease was becoming a bigger
worry.
Our community on the walkway was interesting.
One day a reporter came by and asked me if we had a "mayor" ...
we didn't. Everyone worked. Everyone joined in. Everyone
did the job that made them most comfortable. And everything
functioned. And as people joined us, they automatically
joined in the work. There were differences, but everyone
worked. When there was talk about leaving or looking
for ways out, it was discussed collectively. There was
always a sense of staying together and getting out as
a group. There was also nastiness, and racism, and comments
about "the people down there" in the Convention
Center. We intervened with a lot with people in our group
who were blaming all the "people down there" for
the violence. We intervened when reporters started to
come and were told that "the people down there"
were looting and killing. We told them that they were
doing just what we were doing -- doing what was necessary
to survive in desperate circumstances.
I don't know what else to say. We were anxious all the
time. The nights were the worst ... partly because nights
are generally more frightening, but also because there
were often shots or explosions. There was always a surprise,
and it was always bad news. It seemed like it would never
get better. We just waited and scavenged. We worried
that things would get more violent as they got more desperate.
We also made incredible friends and saw amazing acts
of kindness.
One morning, we woke and packed at 3 am because of a
rumor that the buses were coming early in the morning.
We waited and hoped. No buses came. We cleaned up camp
and sat down to wait again, hoping to get through another
day without tragedy.
It was Friday or Saturday that we heard
the news that Bush was coming to view the disaster. That
was when I first thought we would be getting out. I knew
that New Orleans was another stage, and that the president
wasn't going to show up unless the troops were coming
and the mess was going to be cleaned up. Here was a chance
to improve his ratings. Here was a place where an appearance
without an immediate success would be a political disaster.
Here was another excellent political stage. And of course
we looked down the next day at noon and there were the
troops. And a perimeter was set up. And piles of water
and food were set up in the parking area. And that was
the beginning of the evacuation. By the next day, the
buses arrived. I think we finally left at around 4 pm
on Saturday.
Once the troops arrived, the general anxiety level went
down. Now it was just a question of getting out. Fires
were burning. When the wind shifted it was hard to breathe,
but we knew if no other disaster hit, we would get out
soon. As always, they told us the buses were coming.
We didn't believe it for a minute. The
National Guard told us we had to vacate the walkway and
go down onto the street to await the buses. Of course
we refused. We told them we had a community here that
was self sufficient. There was no need for us to be on
the street and in the sun for nothing. That here, we
were supplying food, medical services, etc to ourselves
and to anyone who had a need. By this time, we had about
five or six elderly and incapacitated people in our group.
They had been left behind by a hospital when they evacuated.
They were with a nurse who had been abandoned with them.
We pointed out that our sick could not go down. We had
another nurse in our group who was very well-spoken,
and helped convince the National Guard that we had to
stay for reasons of the health of the children and the
elderly. So we stuck together and stayed on the walkway.
Nobody left until we finally saw the buses, and were
assured that everyone would get out. And then we marched
out together as a group, with much of the group still
intact.
In convincing the National Guard to let us stay, one
of the more hateful and delusional of our group argued
to the Guard that we should be left on the walkway because
of "racial tensions". This was the same woman
who had been telling everyone who would listen that the
blacks would slaughter us to gain media attention so
they would be evacuated. Anyway, between all the arguments,
we were allowed to stay. And it also resulted in one
of the most shameful moments of our stay. When the meals
were distributed in the parking lot, several distribution
lines were formed. We were given a separate line. Our
line was escorted to and from the food by Guardsmen.
No one from our group was ever able to walk alone. As
always, it is the racist hysterical argument that prevails.
It was better not to get food then to pass through that
disgrace.
We were amazed when we walked down to the corner where
the bus was supposed to be that there was actually a
bus. It took an hour to get out of the city. The driver
did not know where we were going. As usual, we knew nothing.
At some point, the cop leading the line of evacuating
buses informed us that we were going to Fort Chafee,
Arkansas. All we wanted was an airport, but there was
no way off a moving bus. Later, we were told we were
going to Fort Smith, Arkansas, even farther away. We
demanded to be let off. The cop told us that we would
stop to eat in Shreveport, Louisiana and we could get
off there. Of course the bus didn't stop. It did stop
just across the Texas border, where a group of people
had voluntarily set up tables to distribute food and
help to the refugees.
We grabbed our bags and decided to find a ride into
Shreveport. There was no good reason for us to go to
Fort Smith. Ernesto found a volunteer to take us to a
motel by the airport. Our first priority was to bathe
by this point. An airplane was next. Of course no motels
were available. So we decided to spend the night at the
airport. Another man offered to take us. As we were getting
in his car, he also offered us a shower at his house.
We took him up on it and headed off. We showered, chatted,
etc. I made plane reservations for 7 am the next morning.
They invited us to stay and sleep for the hour and a
half that remained of the night. They gave us food and
little presents, a tee-shirt from their local high school
baseball team, etc. They were kind, concerned, and really
wanted to help and do the right thing. As we talked it
was also clear that they were religious conservatives,
racist, homophobic, etc. East Texas ... kindness and
hatefulness on the same plate.
Anyway, we're home. We're still angry
and anxious. Writing all this makes me relive it. Reading
it makes Bruni cry. What we saw was just too raw. Poor
people abandoned because they were poor. Poor people
treated as trash. Poor people being branded as looters
and thieves for trying to survive. Our own country treating
us just as we treat the Iraqis, Palestinians, and every
other country that we exploit or invade. How can we ever
deny class warfare?
The other thing that struck me were
the contradictions in people ... how the kindest people
in our group who gave aid and compassion individually
to blacks and whites, rich and poor, also painted all
those people at the Convention Center with the same brush
-- animals, looters, ignorants.
And it is no wonder when all the papers
write and all the news reports is looting and violence
-- as if there was no need or reason to "loot".
Sure, there were some violent people there. There are
everywhere. But this handful gets turned into "those
people", and everyone gets branded. So no compassion
is needed for the poor. After all, "they brought
it on themselves ... they wouldn't let the government
help, even though the government tried so hard".
And that becomes what this country believes. And then
of course the government can "morally"
do nothing for the poor -- which is what it intended
in the first place.
That's all I have for now. After you read this, give
me a call and we can talk.
September 14, 2005
By JORDAN FLAHERTY
CounterPunch
What actually happened
in New Orleans these past two weeks? We need to sort
through the rumors and distortions. Perhaps we need our
version of South Africa's Truth And Reconciliation Commission.
Some way to sort through the many narratives and find
a truth, and to find justice.
I spent yesterday inside the city
of New Orleans, speaking to a few of the last holdouts
in the 9th ward/ bywater neighborhood. Their stories
paint a very different picture from what we've heard
in the media. Instead of stories of gangs of criminals
and police and soldiers keeping order, there were stories
of collective action, everyone looking out for each
other, communal responses.
The first few nights there was a large,
free community barbecue at a neighborhood bar called
The Country Club. People brought food and cooked and
cooked and drank and went swimming (yes, there's a pool
in the bar).
Emily Harris and Richie Kay, from Desire Street, traveled
out on their boat and brought supplies and gave rides.
They have been doing this almost every day since the
hurricane struck. They estimate that they have rescued
at least a hundred people. Emily doesn't want to leave.
She is a carpenter and builder, and says, "I want
to stay and rebuild. I love New Orleans"
Emily describes a community working together in the
first days after the hurricane. She also describes a
scene of abandonment and disappointment.
"A lot of people came to the high ground at St.
Claude Avenue. They really thought someone would come
and rescue them, and they waited all day for something
- a boat, a helicopter, anything. There were helicopters
in the sky, but none coming down"
So people started walking as a mass uptown to Canal
Street. Along the way, youths would break into grocery
stores, take the food and distribute it evenly among
houses in the community.
"Then they reached Canal Street, and saw that there
was still no one that wanted to rescue them. That's when
people broke into the stores on Canal Street"
I asked Okra, in his house off of Piety
Street, what the biggest problem has been. He said, "It's
been the police - they've lost the last restraints on
their behavior they had, and gotten a license to go wild.
They can do anything they want. I saw one cop beat a
guy so hard that he almost took his ear off. And this
was someone just trying to walk home"
Walking through the streets, I witnessed hundreds of
soldiers patrolling the streets. Everyone I spoke to
said that soldiers were coming to their house at least
once a day, trying to convince them to leave, bringing
stories of disease and quarantine and violence. I didn't
see or speak to any soldiers involved in any clean up
or rebuilding.
There are surely reasons to leave - I would not be living
in the city at this point. I'm too attached to electricity
and phone lines. But I can attest that those holdouts
I spoke to are doing fine. They have enough food and
water and have been very careful to avoid exposing themselves
to the many health risks in the city.
I saw more city busses rolling through poor areas of
town than I ever saw pre-hurricane. Unfortunately, these
buses were filled with patrols of soldiers. What if the
massive effort placed into patrolling this city and chasing
everyone out were placed into beginning the rebuilding
process?
Some neighborhoods are underwater still, and the water
has turned into a sticky sludge of sewage and death that
turns the stomach and breaks my heart. However, some
neighborhoods are barely damaged at all, and if a large-scale
effort were put into bringing back electricity and clearing
the streets of debris, people could begin to move back
in now.
Certainly some people do not want to move back, but
many of us do. We want to rebuild our city that we love.
The People's Hurricane Fund - a grassroots, community
based group made up of New Orleans community organizers
and allies from around the US - has already made one
of their first demands a "right of return for the
displaced of New Orleans.
In the last week, I've traveled between Houston, Baton
Rouge, Covington, Jackson and New Orleans and spoken
to many of my former friends and neighbors. We feel shell
shocked. It used to be we would see each other in a coffee
shop or a bar or on the street and talk and find out
what we're doing. Those of us who were working for social
justice felt a community. We could share stories, combine
efforts, and we never felt alone. Now we're alone and
dispersed and we miss our homes and our communities and
we still don't know where so many of our loved ones even
are.
It may be months before we start to get a clear picture
of what happened in New Orleans. As people are dispersed
around the US reconstructing that story becomes even
harder than reconstructing the city. Certain
sites, like the Convention Center and Superdome, have
become legendary, but despite the thousands of people
who were there, it still is hard to find out exactly
what did happen.
According to a report that's been circulated,
Denise Young, one of those trapped in the convention
center told family members,
"yes, there were young men with guns there, but
they organized the crowd. They went to Canal Street and
looted,' and brought back food and water for the old
people and the babies, because nobody had eaten in days.
When the police rolled down windows and yelled out the
buses are coming,' the young men with guns organized
the crowd in order: old people in front, women and children
next, men in the back,just so that when the buses came,
there would be priorities of who got out first" But
the buses never came. "Lots of people being dropped
off, nobody being picked up. Cops passing by, speeding
off. We thought we were being left to die"
Larry Bradshaw and Lorrie Beth Slonsky, paramedics from
Service Employees International Union Local 790 reported
on their experience downtown, after leaving a hotel they
were staying at for a convention. "We walked to
the police command center at Harrah's on Canal Street
and were told ...that we were on our own, and no they
did not have water to give us. We now numbered several
hundred. We held a mass meeting to decide a course of
action. We agreed to camp outside the police command
post. We would be plainly visible to the media and would
constitute a highly visible embarrassment to the City
officials. The police told us that we could not stay.
Regardless, we began to settle in and set up camp. In
short order, the police commander came across the street
to address our group. He told us he had a solution: we
should walk to the Pontchartrain Expressway and cross
the greater New Orleans Bridge where the police had buses
lined up to take us out of the City...
"We organized ourselves and the 200 of us set off
for the bridge with great excitement and hope. ...As
we approached the bridge, armed Gretna sheriffs formed
a line across the foot of the bridge. Before we were
close enough to speak, they began firing their weapons
over our heads. This sent the crowd fleeing in various
directions...
"Our small group retreated back down Highway 90
to seek shelter from the rain under an overpass. We debated
our options and in the end decided to build an encampment
in the middle of the Ponchartrain Expressway on the center
divide, between the O'Keefe and Tchoupitoulas exits.
We reasoned we would be visible to everyone, we would
have some security being on an elevated freeway and we
could wait and watch for the arrival of the yet to be
seen buses.
"All day long, we saw other families, individuals
and groups make the same trip up the incline in an attempt
to cross the bridge, only to be turned away. Some chased
away with gunfire, others simply told no, others to be
verbally berated and humiliated. Thousands of New Orleanians
were prevented and prohibited from self-evacuating the
City on foot. Meanwhile, the only two City shelters sank
further into squalor and disrepair. The only way across
the bridge was by vehicle. We saw workers stealing trucks,
buses, moving vans, semi-trucks and any car that could
be hot wired. All were packed with people trying to escape
the misery New Orleans had become"
Media reports of armed gangs focused
on black youth, but New Orleans community activist, Black
Panther, and former Green Party candidate for City Council
Malik Rahim reported from the West Bank of New Orleans, "There
are gangs of white vigilantes near here riding around
in pickup trucks, all of them armed" I also heard
similar reports from two of my neighbors - a white gay
couple - who i visited on Esplanade Avenue.
The reconstruction of New Orleans starts now. We need
to reconstruct the truth, we need to reconstruct families,
who are still separated, we need to reconstruct the lives
and community of the people of New Orleans, and, finally,
we need to reconstruct the city.
Since I moved to New Orleans, I've been inspired and
educated by the grassroots community organizing that
is an integral part of the life of the city. It is this
community infrastructure that is needed to step forward
and fight for restructuring with justice.
In 1970, when hundreds of New Orleans police came to
kick the Black Panthers out of the Desire Housing Projects,
the entire community stood between the police and the
Panthers, and the police were forced to retreat.
The grassroots infrastructure of New Orleans is the
infrastructure of secondlines and Black Mardi Gras: true
community support. The Social Aid and Pleasure Clubs
organize New Orleans' legendary secondline parades -
roving street parties that happen almost every weekend.
These societies were formed to provide insurance to the
Black community because Black people could not buy insurance
legally, and to this day the "social aid is as important
as the pleasure.
The only way that New Orleans will be
reconstructed as even a shadow of its former self is
if the people of New Orleans have direct control over
that reconstruction. But, our community dislocation is
only increasing. Every day, we are spread out further.
People leave Houston for Oregon and Chicago. We are losing
contact with each other, losing our community that has
nurtured us.
Already, the usual forces of corporate restructuring
are lining up. Halliburton's Kellogg Brown & Root
subsidiary has begun work on a $500 million US Navy contract
for emergency repairs at Gulf Coast naval and marine
facilities damaged by Hurricane Katrina. Blackwell Security
- the folks that brought you Abu Ghraib - are patrolling
the streets of our city.
The Wall Street Journal reported
that the rich white elite is already planning their
vision of New Orleans' reconstruction, from the super-rich
gated compounds of Audubon Place Uptown, where they
have set up a heliport and brought in a heavily-armed
Israeli security company."The
new city must be something very different, one of these
city leaders was quoted as saying, "with better
services and fewer poor people. Those who want to see
this city rebuilt want to see it done in a completely
different way: demographically, geographically and
politically"
While the world's attention is focused on New Orleans,
in a time when its clear to most of the world that the
federal government's greed and heartlessness has caused
this tragedy, we have an opportunity to make a case for
a people's restructuring, rather than a Halliburton restructuring.
The people of New Orleans have the
will. Today, I met up with Andrea Garland, a community
activist with Get Your Act On who is planning a bold
direct action; she and several of her friends are moving
back in to their homes. They have generators and supplies,
and they invite anyone who is willing to fight for New
Orleans to move back in with them. Malik Rahim, in New
Orleans' West Bank, is refusing to leave and is inviting
others to join him. Community organizer Shana Sassoon,
exiled in Houston, is planning a community mapping project
to map out where our diaspora is being sent, to aid in
our coming back together. Abram Himmelstein and Rachel
Breulin of The Neighborhood Story Project are beginning
the long task of documenting oral histories of our exile.
Please join us in this fight. This is not just about
New Orleans. This is about community and collaboration
versus corporate profiteering. The struggle for New Orleans
lives on.
Jordan Flaherty is a union organizer and an editor of
Left Turn Magazine (www.leftturn.org). He is not planning
on moving out of New Orleans. He can be reached at: anticapitalist@hotmail.com
Pacific News Service, First-person
narrative, Nick Glassman, Sep 07, 2005
Editor's Note: A Bay
Area man goes to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina
and finds a war zone of floating bodies, armed and angry
survivors and threatening policemen.
I just returned this past weekend from my first trip
to Louisiana since Katrina. It's beyond what you can
imagine -- it's hell on Earth.
I flew into Baton Rouge, which sits about 80 miles northwest
of New Orleans, and the city is destroyed, but not by
the storm. There are hundreds of thousands of refugees
from New Orleans in Baton Rouge. People are camping on
the side of the roads, in their cars if they have them,
and all over the LSU campus. The first thing you notice
is how outraged everyone is.
The people of Baton Rouge don't want us here, and you
can't blame them. There seems to be no plan for the New
Orleaneans once they are dropped off in Baton Rouge,
and locals are confused, horrified or worse. They know
this is potentially a permanent situation, or at least
the way it will be for the next several months. It's
safe to say they're as scared as the homeless and exhausted
refugees that litter their streets.
We rented four houses in Houma, La., which is about
50 miles south of Baton Rouge or about 30 miles west
of New Orleans. We spent the weekend moving our family
there, then our friends, and then people we met who had
no other options. When I left, we had perhaps 40 people
and another 20 on the way. It's an amazing thing to see
-- your best friends, family and everyone in between
huddled on floorboards, makeshift beds and sleeping bags.
It's truly like a nuclear bomb hit our city, and we are
doing everything we can just to keep everyone housed,
fed and with clean water.
I decide to go into New Orleans as there are far too
many people from our home unaccounted for. It's Saturday,
September 3.
There is no way to get into the city. The roads that
are open are being used to bring people out, and no traffic
is headed in. I drive a rental car 30 miles on backroads
that I guess won't be flooded. I make it about half way
until can no longer get into the city by car. With a
backpack loaded with as much water as I can carry, two
packs of breakfast bars, three canisters of bug spray,
and an extra pair of shoes, I start walking.
First, there's the climate. It's almost 90 degrees,
and the humidity and the still water have made the swamp
come alive with bugs. The mosquito swarms and other bugs
make sound like a blizzard. I have to wear long-sleeve
shirts and pants, and I'm drenched with sweat.
The first group of people I meet are very friendly.
I trade my ipod for a kid's dirt bike so I can make better
time, and they give me extra water. They try to warn
me it isn't safe to head into the city. They warn me
about what neighborhoods to avoid, and that above everything
else, it was critical to stay away from the police. They'll
force you to leave by putting you on a bus destined for
who knows where, and if you resist, they'll arrest you.
It's the first time I sense that the police and government
are seen as enemies by Katrina survivors. At first, I
simply consider that shortsighted, but over the next
two days, I start to understand why they think that way.
I get to the outskirts of the city by about 2 p.m. --
an upscale neighborhood called Metaire, where most of
the money of New Orleans lives. To get that far already
involved about half a mile of swimming. Everything is
destroyed. The area isn't just underwater, it's more
that the swamps have risen over New Orleans. There are
snakes and alligators everywhere, and the more you see,
the more you realize the city isn't going to be livable
for who knows how long.
Then there are the bodies. I first start seeing them
as I cross from Metaire into what is called Midcity,
the neighborhood you drive through to get to Jazz Fest
and the fairgrounds. Until now, I've only seen a few
dead bodies in my entire life. Some have been pushed
against dry spots by, I presume, rescue workers. Others
are just floating in the water. There are houses with
red marks on them, meaning there's someone dead inside.
The most horrifying part of all is what happens when
a body is floating in the water for two or three days.
It's barely recognizable as a person. When you see one,
it's riddled with mosquitoes and who knows what else.
The city is not at all empty as the news says it is.
I find hundreds if not thousands of people in all the
different neighborhoods, and they have no intention of
leaving. First and foremost, they have nowhere to go.
Many people don't want to leave. They don't trust they'll
ever be let back in, and they certainly aren't going
to allow their homes to be pillaged by people crafty
enough not to get kicked out. Finally, they just don't
believe the argument that the city will be unsafe and
infested with disease.
They're armed and angry. They have already survived
five straight days of no food and no water, and they
don't believe those who haven't gotten them food or water
are going to find a place for them to live.
I grew up in the 9th Ward, one of the lowest income
areas in the city and the site of the first levee break.
To get to my childhood home, I would have to dive underwater
just to get to the roof. I go to the second house we
lived in. Its roof has been torn off and there's a body
floating not 50 feet away from the front porch. I wish
I can say my friends' houses fared better. Most were
either completely submerged in 10 to 15 feet of water
or just not standing anymore. I find three people I know,
and they set off for Houma that afternoon.
People are furious. They feel they've been abandoned.
You have to understand, there's no power anywhere. The
rescue crews are going through New Orleans proper but
not all the neighborhoods where people live. Most people
don't even think there's a rescue effort underway at
all. It becomes clear to me the one thing people need
is communication; without it fear takes over. There's
nothing more important to restoring order than giving
the leaders an ability to get messages to everyone.
I know everyone has heard about people firing on helicopters.
I'm certainly not saying it is right, but after being
there, I understand. For five days, helicopters are flying
overhead, but none of them are dropping water or food
down for anyone. They fly by using load speakers saying
that anyone found looting or stealing will be arrested,
and those are the helicopters that are followed by gunshots,
from what I see.
The only government group anyone has seen are the police
with sawed-off shotguns threatening to arrest everyone
who is walking around on the streets.
Everyone is fearful for his future, and fear leads people
to do amazing, extraordinary things. It's a state of
war. People don't even know who they're fighting, but
they know they're at war. Twice, I bike away at full
speed from people that come at me. Before I leave the
city, my cash, backpack loaded with food and change of
clothes and my camera are stolen. The final time, two
people robbed me of my water. They didn't even ask for
cash or my watch, just my water. It is desperation, and
the last thing I could ever feel is anger.
I'll never forget this weekend. I'll probably spend
years wishing I could. You just can't describe what it's
like to see the hometown that you love, that's a part
of everything you are, littered with floating dead bodies,
and to see "your people" firing guns at strangers
and hating everyone and everything. It's one of the worst
things I've ever felt or seen. It's a war being fought
against no one.
Hurricanes
can trigger swarms of weak earthquakes and even set
the Earth vibrating, according to the first study of
such effects.
When Hurricane Charley slammed into
Florida in August 2004, physicist Randall Peters
of Mercer University in Macon, Georgia, had a seismometer
ready to monitor any vibrations in the Earth's crust.
He did so for over 36 hours as Charley travelled
briefly over Florida, then slid back out into the
Atlantic.
As the hurricane reached land, the seismometer
recorded a series of "micro-tremors" from
the Earth's crust. This happened again as the storm
moved back out to sea. Then, as Charley grazed the
continental shelf on its way out, it caused a sharp
seismic spike. "I suspect the storm triggered
a subterranean landslide," says Peters.
More surprisingly,
the storm also caused the Earth to vibrate. The
planet's surface in the vicinity of the hurricane
started moving up and down at several frequencies
ranging from 0.9 to 3 millihertz. Such
low-frequency vibrations have been detected following
large earthquakes, but
this is the first time a storm has been found to
be the cause.
Comment: For
many months we have been predicting that the American
economy will collapse before the end of 2005. Given
the available signs and evidence we are now of the
opinion that the current severe hurricane season, triggering
a major earthqake and volcano on the US mainland, may
well be the precursor to just such a collapse and it's
dire consequences for millions of American people.
In essence, the scenes at the end of last month in
New Orleans will soon be common throughout large areas
of the North American continent.
METTLER, Calif. - A series of
earthquakes ranging up to magnitude 4.9 shook an area
north of Los Angeles on Thursday. There were no immediate
reports of injuries or damage.
The temblors in the San Joaquin Valley about 70
miles northwest of Los Angeles began with a magnitude-4.0
jolt that was quickly followed by the 4.9 at 1:24
p.m., according to the U.S. Geological Survey in
Pasadena.
Seismologists recorded at least five aftershocks ranging
between magnitudes 3 and 3.7.
"The only things we're getting reported is that
some items toppled over on shelves, but we've gotten
no reports of damages or injuries," said Kern
County fire Capt. Doug Johnston.
Johnston said the area contains mostly dairies and
farmlands.
Comment: As
of this morning, another 3.6 magnitude quake has
hit the L.A. area.
Look at this map of one of the North American fault
lines:
Then re-read the article about hurricanes
causing earthquakes. Then imagine a massive subduction
quake in the pacific North West, and Mount Rainier blowing
its top for real this time. 500 foot Tsunami in
Puget Sound anyone?
There is a saying of sorts that "if
you are going to do something, do it well", and
given the serious consequences, nowhere is that more
true than when you plan to engage in criminal activity.
Today in Basra, Southern Iraq, two members of the British
SAS (Special Ops) were caught, 'in flagrante' as it
were, dressed in full "Arab garb", driving
a car full of explosives and shooting and killing two
official Iraqi policemen.
This fact, finally reported by the mainstream press,
goes to the very heart of and proves accurate much
of what we have been saying on the Signs of the Times
page for several years.
The following are facts, indisputable by all but the
most self-deluded:
Number 1:
The US and British invasion of Iraq was NOT for the
purpose of bringing
"freedom and democracy" to the Iraqi people,
but rather for the purpose of securing Iraq's oil resources
for the US and British governments and expanding their
control over the greater Middle East.
Number 2:
Both the Bush and Blair governments deliberately fabricated
evidence (lied) about the threat the Saddam posed to
the west and his links to the mythical 'al-Qaeda' in
order to justify their invasion.
Number 3:
Dressed as Arabs, British (and CIA and Israeli) 'special
forces' have been carrying out fake "insurgent" attacks,
including 'car suicide bombings' against Iraqi policemen
and Iraqi civilians (both Sunni and Shia) for the past
two years. Evidence would suggest that these tactics
are designed to provide continued justification for
a US and British military presence in Iraq and to ultimately
embroil the country in a civil war that will lead to
the breakup of Iraq into more manageable statelets,
much to the joy of the Israeli right and their long-held
desire for the establishment of biblical 'greater Israel'
Coming not long after the botched London bombings
carried out by British MI5 where an eyewitness
reported that the floor of one of the trains had
been blown inwards (how can a bomb in a backpack or
on a "suicide bomber" INSIDE the train ever
produce such an effect), more than anything else today's
event in Basra highlights the desperation that is driving
the policy-makers in the British government.
British intelligence would do well to think twice
about carrying out any more 'false flag' operations
until they can achieve the 'professionalism' of the
Israeli Mossad - they always make it look convincing
and rarely suffer the ignominy of being caught in the
act and having the faces of their erstwhile "terrorists" plastered
across the pages of the mainstream media.
The
REAL face of "Islamic Terror" - Two
SAS agents caught carrying out a false flag
terror attack in Basra, Iraq September 20th
2005.
BAGHDAD, Iraq -- A British armored vehicle escorted
by a tank crashed into a detention center Monday
in Basra and rescued two undercover
troops held by police, an Iraqi Interior Ministry
official told CNN.
British Defense Ministry Secretary John Reid confirmed
two British military personnel were "released," but
he gave no details on how they were freed.
In a statement released in London, Reid did not
say why the two had been taken into custody. But
the Iraqi official, who spoke to CNN on condition
of anonymity, said their arrests stemmed from an
incident earlier in the day.
The official said two unknown
gunmen in full Arabic dress began firing on civilians
in central Basra, wounding several, including a
traffic police officer. There were no fatalities,
the official said.
The two gunmen fled the scene but
were captured and taken in for questioning, admitting
they were British marines carrying out a "special
security task," the official said.
British troops launched the rescue about three hours
after Iraqi authorities informed British commanders
the men were being held at the police department's
major crime unit, the official said.
Iraqi police said members of Iraq's Mehdi Army militia
engaged the British forces around the facility, burning
one personnel carrier and an armored vehicle.
Video showed dozens of Iraqis surrounding British
armored vehicles and tossing gasoline bombs, rocks
and other debris at them.
With one vehicle engulfed in flames,
a soldier opened the hatch and bailed out as rocks
were thrown at him. Another photograph showed a British
soldier on fire on top of a tank.
"Many of those present were clearly prepared
well in advance to cause trouble, and we believe
that the majority of Iraq people would deplore this
violence," Reid said. [...]
Iraqi security officials on
Monday variously accused the two Britons they detained
of shooting at Iraqi forces or trying to plant
explosives. Photographs of the two men in
custody showed them in civilian clothes.
When British officials apparently
sought to secure their release, riots erupted. Iraqi
police cars circulated downtown, calling through
loudspeakers for the public to help stop British
forces from releasing the two. Heavy gunfire broke
out and fighting raged for hours, as crowds swarmed
British forces and set at least one armored vehicle
on fire.
Witnesses said they saw Basra
police exchanging fire with British forces. Sadr's
Mahdi Army militia joined in the fighting late in
the day, witnesses said. A British military spokesman,
Darren Moss, denied that British troops were fighting
Basra police.
Iraqi police detained two British
soldiers in civilian clothes in the southern city
Basra for firing on a police station on Monday,
police said.
"Two persons wearing Arab
uniforms opened fire at a police station in Basra.
A police patrol followed the attackers and captured
them to discover they were two British soldiers," an
Interior Ministry source told Xinhua.
The two
soldiers were using a civilian car packed with
explosives, the source said. He added that
the two were being interrogated in the police headquarters
of Basra.
The British forces informed the
Iraqi authorities that the two soldiers were performing
an official duty, the source said. British military
authorities said they could not confirm the incident
but investigations were underway.
Interestingly, on the same day
as this botched covert operation, the CIA and Mossad's
number two bogeyman, al-Zawahri, pipes up and reminds
the world that 'al-Qaeda' was responsible for the London
bombings. How very decent of him.
Al-Qaeda deputy Ayman al-Zawahri
said his terror network carried out the July 7 London
bombings in a statement broadcast on an Arab satellite
television station, marking the group's first direct
claim of responsibility for the attacks that killed
52 people.
The Egyptian-born militant also criticised the legitimacy
of Sunday's Afghanistan parliamentary elections and
condemned Pakistan -- the one-time ally of Afghanistan's
deposed Taliban regime -- for forging strong ties
with the United States.
"The blessed London attack was one which al-Qaeda
was honoured to launch against the British Crusader's
arrogance and against the American Crusader aggression
on the Islamic nation for 100 years," al-Zawahri
said in the tape aired on Monday on Qatar-based al-Jazeera
TV.
"In their final testament, the heroic brothers
in the London attacks ... provided great lessons to
the Islamic nation and Muslims in Pakistan to oppose
the infidels," said al-Zawahri, who wore a black
turban and white shirt and spoke to someone off-camera
who was interviewing him.
In another tape aired on September 2, al-Zawahri,
who is thought to be hiding along the rugged Afghan-Pakistani
border, issued a veiled claim of responsibility for
the attacks that also killed the four bombers.
"This blessed attack revealed the real hypocritical
face of the West," said the gray-bearded al-Zawahri in
his latest tape, which included English subtitles and
credits saying it was produced and translated by al-Sahab
Media Production House, a shadowy purported al-Qaeda
media organisation.
While there was no immediate
way to verify al-Zawahri's claim, the
coordinated attacks on three London underground stations
and a double-decker bus bore all the hallmarks of
the group that has claimed responsibility for numerous
bombings, including the September 11 2001 attacks.
Shortly after the London bombings, which were carried
out by four bombers including two of Pakistani descent, two
militant Islamic groups said they were responsible,
but both had made dubious claims in the past.
A spokesperson for London's metropolitan police had
no immediate comment on al-Zawahri's latest tape.
Comment: Of
course, we don't doubt that 'al-Qaeda' really was responsible
for the London bombings, but the crucial question as
always is: who and what IS 'al-Qaeda'...
Fascinating. No really, the ‘evolution’ of
state disinformation has probably never been better displayed
than in the case of the two (more than likely) SAS soldiers
who were ‘liberated’ after being arrested
by the Iraqi police on 19 September by a phalanx of tanks
and helicopter gunships that stormed the police station
where the two undercover soldiers were being held after
they allegedly failed to stop at an Iraqi police roadblock
and subsequently opened fire on the Iraqi police, killing
one and wounding another.
The car they were travelling in was loaded with weapons
including allegedly, assault rifles, a light machine
gun, an anti-tank weapon, radio gear and a medical
kit (’standard’ SAS issue according to
the BBC). According to at least two reports, the car
they were traveling in (A Toyota Cressida) was “booby-trapped”.
Subsequent accounts vary according to the source but
according to the initial story broadcast on the BBC
(19/9/05), the two men wore traditional Arab dress
but then this changed to “civilian dress” (BBC
TV News).
As more information trickled out, a BBC story reported
that the men were freed after the police station had
been attacked by British tanks, a report that the British
government initially denied saying that “the
release of the soldiers had been negotiated” (BBC
Website 20/0/05).
Britain’s Ministry of Defence says the release
of the two soldiers had been negotiated and it did
not believe the prison had been stormed.
“We’ve heard nothing to suggest we stormed the
prison,” a ministry spokesman said.
“We understand there were negotiations.”
Lisa Glover, spokeswoman for the British embassy
in Baghdad, says three people have been wounded in
the operation to free the soldiers.
She did not give further details of how the soldiers
were freed.
Then the story changed yet again, only now the ‘official’ story,
dutifully reported by the British State Broadcasting
Company (BSBC), was that “negotiations broke
down” and that the two men were in the hands
of the Mehdi Army in another building, in which case,
why was the police station stormed?
Then yet another version was issued by the British
government only now the police station was indeed attacked
but only after “negotiations broke down”.
So were the two SAS men in the police station or not?
According to yet another BSBC report, after breaking
into the police station, the Brits discovered that
they had been moved to a Mehdi Army house for “interrogation”.
Yet subsequent accounts revealed that they had in fact,
been in the police station all along and, according
to a CNN report, were being questioned by an Iraqi
judge, not, as the British government alleged, by the ‘insurgents’.
By now, in a classic disinformation campaign, so many
stories were being circulated that sorting out the
truth from fiction was virtually impossible unless
one is prepared to dig and dig deep.
What is clear is that the two SAS “undercover
operatives” had been caught red-handed by the
British government’s alleged allies, the Iraqi
police, dressed as Arabs, replete with wigs and armed
to the teeth and in a car which according to one report,
was packed with explosives (the car by the way, has
been taken away by the British occupation forces).
The question the BSBC was not and still is not asking,
is what were they up to, creeping around dressed up
as Iraqis in what is meant to be a relatively peaceful
Basra?
Once more the BSBC answered the question, sort of,
courtesy yet another ‘official’ story,
one that was to emerge only after a very angry crowd
attacked two British armoured vehicles, setting at
least one on fire. The “mob”, as the BSBC
described them, were according to the report, angry
over the arrest of two Mehdi Army members, also on
19 September, and that it had nothing to with the freeing
of the two SAS. In reality of course, the ‘mob’ had
already been informed about the two SAS undercover
guys and were understandably upset.
So now, the two undercover SAS men were, it is imputed,
searching for ‘insurgents’ as part of a
counter-insurgency operation, which if true, what were
they doing dressed as Iraqis?
Were they on some kind of provocative operation? According
to one report, this is exactly what they were up to.
Fattah al-Shaykh, a member of the Iraqi National Assembly
told this account to al-Jazeera
If you really want to look for truth, then we should resort
to the Iraqi justice away from the British provocations against
the sons of Basra, particularly what happened today when
the sons of Basra caught two non-Iraqis, who seem to be Britons
and were in a car of the Cressida type. It was a booby-trapped
car laden with ammunition and was meant to explode in the
centre of the city of Basra in the popular market. However,
the sons of the city of Basra arrested them. They [the two
non-Iraqis] then fired at the people there and killed some
of them. The two arrested persons are now at the Intelligence
Department in Basra, and they were held by the National Guard
force, but the British occupation forces are still surrounding
this department in an attempt to absolve them of the crime.
And in yet another report from Syrian TV we read
[Al-Munajjid] In fact, Nidal, this incident gave answers
to questions and suspicions that were lacking evidence about
the participation of the occupation in some armed operations
in Iraq. Many analysts and observers here had suspicions
that the occupation was involved in some armed operations
against civilians and places of worship and in the killing
of scientists. But those were only suspicions that lacked
proof. The proof came today through the arrest of the two
British soldiers while they were planting explosives in one
of the Basra streets. This proves, according to observers,
that the occupation is not far from many operations that
seek to sow sedition and maintain disorder, as this would
give the occupation the justification to stay in Iraq for
a longer period.
When viewed in the context of all the stories that
have been circulating about the mythical ‘al-Zarqawi’ and
the alleged role of al-Queda, the events in Basra are
the first real evidence that we have of the role of
occupation forces in destabilising Iraq through the
use of agents provocateurs masquerading as ‘insurgents’.
And, as I have long alleged here, it is now almost
certain that ‘al-Zarqawi’ is probably long
dead. An AFP story tells us
[The] Imam of Baghdad’s al-Kazimeya mosque, Jawad
al-Kalesi said, that “al-Zarqawi is dead but Washington
continues to use him as a bogeyman to justify a prolonged
military occupation…He’s simply an invention
by the occupiers to divide the people.” Al-Kalesi added
that al-Zarqawi was killed in the beginning of the war in
the Kurdish north and that “His family in Jordan even
held a ceremony after his death.”
And indeed, last year, in a piece I wrote about ‘al-Zarqawi’,
I referred to a report about ‘al-Zarqawi’ being
killed when the US flattened the ‘base’ of
his group Ansar al-Islam in northern Iraq in early
2003, a report that actually originated with the US
government.
Yet the BSBC, along with the rest of the Western media
continues to put out endless reams of disinformation
about ‘al-Zarqawi’ and his connection to
the fictitious ‘al-Queda in Iraq’. Given
the long-held assertion by the West that goes back
to 2003, that Iraq was on the verge of ‘civil
war’, it’s instructive to note that as
the military situation of the occupation forces has
deteriorated, so too has the level of so-called al-Queda
operations increased, in a transparent attempt to divide
the Iraqi national resistance, thus the increasing
stories about impending civil war and the wave of ‘suicide’ bombings.
The exposure of the undercover SAS operations will
only add to the resolve of Iraqi resistance forces
to step up their campaign to expel the occupiers regardless
of what kind of blatant propaganda line the UK government
puts out.
It furthermore exposes the untenable position of the
Iraqi ‘government’ which is now being squeezed
by both sides, thus we get contradictory positions
from the Iraqi ‘government’, with one denying
that the SAS operatives had been handed over to ‘Shiite
militia’ and the other trying desperately to
tread an almost invisible line between condemning the
actions of the British government whilst blaming the
actions of the Iraqi police in Basra on ‘insurgents’ who
have ‘infiltrated’ the police force. Yet
it is a fact that at best, perhaps only 25% of the
Iraqi military can be relied upon to serve their colonial
masters.
Continuing to call them insurgents is itself an admission
that the majority of Iraqis are opposed to the occupation
and indeed, the bulk of the fighting is being carried
out by the Kurdish Peshmerga as Iraqi forces simply
cannot be relied on. It’s a classic situation
that the US and UK military top brass know only too
well having ‘been there and done that’ before.
Thus the occupiers become more desperate to destabilise
the situation and no doubt we’ll see more SAS
and US provocations revealed over the coming weeks
as the situation continues to deteriorate.
A Basra judge has issued an arrest
warrant for two British soldiers after an Iraqi civilian
was reportedly killed and a police officer injured.
The two servicemen - believed to be undercover SAS
officers - were detained after a confrontation on
Monday.
UK troops later freed the soldiers from Iraqi custody
after storming a police station in the southern Iraqi
city.
Defence Secretary John Reid said no warrant had been
received - and British personnel were immune from Iraqi
laws.
"The MoD has not received any arrest warrant
relating to any British personnel in Iraq," he
said.
"Iraqi law is very clear:
British personnel are immune from the Iraqi legal
process; they remain subject to British law."
Comment: "Iraqi
law" that was recently made by British and US
diplomats.
"Even if such a warrant was
issued, it would therefore be of no legal effect."
British forces spokesman Major Steve
Melbourne said the two men had immunity from prosecution
under an arrangement between the Iraqi government and
coalition forces.
It was widely believed that the
soldiers on an intelligence mission in the
city when they were challenged by Iraqi police officers,
our correspondent said.
UNITED NATIONS - Faced with a
rising death toll among its soldiers in Iraq, the United
States is trying to "buy" foreign troops
for a proposed 30,000-strong multinational force in
Baghdad.
"When they were seeking U.N. support for a
war on Iraq, they were twisting arms," one Asian
diplomat told IPS. "Now they are offering carrots
in exchange for our troops."
The inducements -- including weapons and increased
military aid -- have apparently been offered to at
least three countries whose troops Washington desperately
needs to bolster the fledgling multinational force
in Iraq and relieve the pressure on U.S. forces in
the war-ravaged country.
The administration of President George
W. Bush has intensified efforts to seek troops from
India, Pakistan and Turkey in order to bolster a
multinational force that now includes troops mostly
from former Soviet republics and Latin American nations.
The Indian government, which withdrew its offer of
17,000 troops under heavy domestic political pressure
in New Delhi, is being lobbied once again with an offer
of sophisticated military equipment.
The quid pro quo, according to diplomatic sources,
is approval of the proposed sale of the state-of-the-art
Arrow-2 missile defence system by Israel. Since the
100-million-dollar system includes U.S. components
and funding, Israel needs U.S. approval to close the
deal.
General Richard Myers, chairman of the
U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, is now in New Delhi to
try and convince the government of Prime Minister Atal
Bihari Vajpayee to change its stance on troops for
Iraq.
The London 'Financial Times' said Tuesday that the
Bush administration has also pledged to further relax
the sale of dual-use technology to India in return
for that country sending troops to Iraq.
France, Germany, India, Pakistan and several other
nations have declined to provide troops unless there
is a new U.N. resolution authorising the proposed multinational
peacekeeping force in Iraq.
But India could change its position, according
to Professor Stephen Cohen, director of the South Asia
programme at the Brookings Institution.
"For all we know, they are still
talking about terms under which India might come," he
said in an interview. "That's part of the bargaining
game that's going on."
Since the war on Iraq began Mar.19, 244 U.S. soldiers
have died -- 163 from hostile actions and 81 from accidents.
The rising death toll looms as a political liability
for Bush who faces re-election next year.
The 150,000 U.S. troops in Iraq are backed by 12,000
from Britain.
Among the key countries that have pledged troops for
the new multinational force are Spain, Poland, Japan
and Ukraine.
Washington is also expecting smaller units from Hungary,
Romania, Latvia, Estonia, Slovakia, Honduras, El Salvador,
the Dominican Republic, Mongolia, the Philippines and
Nicaragua. It has logistical support from Italy, Netherlands,
Norway, Portugal and South Korea.
The 'Washington Post' reported Tuesday that some of
the countries were providing troops only at a cost
to U.S. taxpayers.
The Bush administration has agreed to
pay 240 million dollars in support costs to the Polish
contingent of about 9,000 troops. The costs will cover
airlift transportation, meals, medical care and other
expenses.
The proposed Indian contingent of 17,000 troops would
have been the largest single foreign force, exceeding
the 12,000 troops from Britain, Washington's coalition
partner in the war against Iraq.
But the move to provide Indian troops
generated strong political and public opposition in
New Delhi, threatening a government that faces elections
next year.
India's neighbour and foe Pakistan has been offered
three billion dollars in U.S. aid over the next five
years, of which 1.5 billion dollars will be in military
aid.
And according to the Ankara-based 'Hurriyet' newspaper,
the United States has been lobbying the Turkish government
for about 10,000 troops for Iraq.
Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz told the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee on Tuesday the administration
was discussing troop deployments both by Pakistan and
Turkey.
"The Bush administration is doing
the right thing in looking for
additional help in Iraq, " says Natalie J. Goldring,
executive director of the Programme on Global Security
and Disarmament at the University of Maryland.
"But the U.S. government should be seeking that
help through the United Nations. Instead, U.S. political
and military leaders are once again trying to buy countries'
cooperation with weapons transfers and military aid," she
told IPS.
Goldring added that there is no evidence that providing
India with a missile defence system will decrease the
level of conflict in the unstable South Asian region.
"Quite the contrary. Past attempts by India or
Pakistan to gain military advantage have inevitably
been matched or countered by the other country, continuing
and often accelerating the already dangerous arms race
in that part of the world," she added.
At a press conference Wednesday, U.N. Secretary-General
Kofi Annan said that he believes the international
community is seeking to
"internationalise" the Iraqi operations under
a U.N. umbrella.
"It is important for them -- not just for Europe
or India, but also for the region. The Arab states
will feel more comfortable" to provide troops
under U.N. auspices, he added.
The United States has refused to seek approval for
a U.N. peacekeeping force because it may have to concede
some of its military authority to the United Nations.
Wolfowitz told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
that Washington would agree to a U.N. resolution only
if it did not curtail U.S. military authority.
In a recent speech at Fort Bragg,
a major U.S. military base, president Bush declared, "There
is no higher calling than service in our armed forces." It
seems fewer and fewer young Americans and their parents
agree with him. The U.S. military is finding it increasingly
difficult to sustain itself. This is despite what at
first sight should be fruitful conditions for military
recruitment: the events of Sept. 11 and the fears about
terrorism; the argument by the Bush administration
that the global war on terrorism must be fought in
Afghanistan and Iraq and other such faraway places,
or it will end up having to be fought at home; and
America's ongoing wars that bring to the screens daily
stories of heroic "warriors" liberating and
defending the innocent.
Troop Shortages
Newspapers describe the U.S. Army as "facing
one of the greatest recruiting challenges in its history." The
U.S. military is deeply worried. General Barry McCaffrey,
now a professor at the West Point, wrote in the Wall
Street Journal that the U.S. is in a "race against
time" in Iraq because of the strains on the military – the
military is "starting to unravel." He argues
that, "The U.S. Army and the Marines are too under-manned
and under-resourced to sustain this security policy
beyond next fall." The consequences are great.
For McCaffrey, the U.S. military in Iraq is "the
crown jewel of our national security guarantee to the
American people in the war on terror." This threatens
the future of the American wars in Iraq and Afghanistan,
and as McCaffrey puts it, "Failure would be a
disaster for U.S. foreign policy and economic interests
for the next 20 years."
Sending in more troops, the American solution year
after year in the Vietnam War, does not seem to be
an option. President Bush has said that he would send
more troops to Iraq if the military commanders in the
field asked for them. He claims that they have not
done so. But others suggest a more serious obstacle.
Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev.), the Senate minority leader,
has said that U.S. military commanders in Iraq have
told him that they need more troops but they know none
are available. Reed has said, "The conclusion
I reach is that they know the soldiers aren't there,
so why ask for something you know doesn't exist?"
A recent study by the RAND Corporation, a military
think-tank, "Stretched Thin: Army Forces for Sustained
Operations" found that the troop shortage in the
Army is so severe that it calls into question the Pentagon's
policy of being able to fight two major regional wars
at the same time while also having sufficient soldiers
for the war on terrorism and providing security in
America. A recent meeting of the National Governors'
Association, which brings together the governors of
the states, registered the governors' concern that
deployment of National Guard soldiers in Iraq was leaving
their states unable to deal with possible natural disasters
and other emergencies, with one governor exclaiming
that "we don't have personnel – whether
it is full time or part time – to take care of
all the needs and concerns of Americans."
Recruitment Problems
Little of this seems to resonate with the public.
So far this year, the U.S. Army is reported to be 40
percent short of its recruitment target. The Army has
failed to meet its monthly recruiting goals in each
of the preceding four months. In mid-July, the U.S.
military reported that the Army National Guard, which
makes up more than one-third of the U.S. soldiers in
Iraq, had missed its recruiting goal for the ninth
straight month. This was an understatement of the larger
trend. The Army National Guard has apparently missed
its recruiting targets for at least 17 of the last
18 months.
U.S. Army Chief of Staff General Peter Schoomaker
told the Senate "We've got enormous challenges" when
it comes to recruitment of new soldiers. The Army's
goal of 80,000 new recruits for this year "is
at serious risk," and next year "may be the
toughest recruiting environment ever." These recruiting
problems, he believes, are likely to stretch "well
into the future."
These problems are despite the enormous incentives
now being offered to join the military. There is a
joining bonus of $90,000 paid over three years, of
which $20,000 is in cash and $70,000 in benefits, along
with a canceling of the loans many a young American
must take to afford to go to college. There are reports
also that people almost 40 years old are now eligible
to join the military, and that the physical and intellectual
standards for recruits have been lowered.
The fall in recruitment is strongest in the African-American
community (12 percent of the U.S. population) and among
women. African-Americans made up almost a quarter of
Army recruits in 2000, now their numbers have fallen
to less than 14 percent. The number of women Army recruits
has dropped from 22 percent in 2000 to about 17 percent.
Women make up about 15 percent of the military in total.
The Military Path to Citizenship
About 7 percent of the U.S.
military are not citizens. There are about 30,000
foreign soldiers in the U.S. military from more than
100 countries; more than a third are Hispanic. To
encourage recruitment, in 2002 the Bush administration
made it easier for foreign-born U.S. troops to become
naturalized citizens. Now, any legal resident who
joins the military can immediately petition for citizenship
rather than wait the five years required for civilians
to start this process. They do not even have to pay
the several hundred dollar fee for this process.
As an added incentive, if a foreign-born soldier
who is a U.S. citizen dies in the line of duty, the
foreign-born members of his or her family can now
seek citizenship, even if they are not legal residents. It
is also possible for soldiers to be made citizens
after they have died in service and for their families
to then become eligible for citizenship.
Despite all this, the numbers of non-citizens joining
the military is falling fast. The number has fallen
by 20 percent since 2001. It is not slowing down, as
much of the decline came last year.
It is not just those would be foot soldiers who are
staying away. Those with the most to defend are less
willing to do so. Army's Reserve Officers' Training
Corps, which trains and commissions more than 60 percent
of the new Army officers each year, has been facing
similar problems. It now has the fewest participants
in nearly a decade, with recruitment having fallen
by more than 16 percent over the past two years. In
a recent article in Harpers, Lewis Lapham pointed out
that there is a longer-term process at work here, noting
that almost half of the 1956 graduating class from
Princeton University went into the military (400 out
of a total of 900 students), but from the class of
2004, there were only nine students who joined out
of a class of 1,100.
The children of America's elite see no future for
themselves in the military. And there are some soldiers
who see this. The story is told of a U.S. Marine who
returned to California after a tour of duty in Iraq
and was invited to speak at a "gated community" in
Malibu as a war hero. He told his audience "I
am not a hero. … Guys like me are just a necessary
part of things. To maintain this way of life in a fine
community like this, you need psychos like us to go
and drop a bomb on somebody's house."
In its efforts to find out why there are now such
problems with recruitment, the Army called in the research
company Millward Brown to do a study. It found that
the resistance was due to popular objection to the
war in Iraq, the casualties, and media coverage of
the torture at Abu Ghraib. The study reportedly concluded
that, "Reasons for not considering military service
are increasingly based on objections to the Iraq situation
and aversion to the military."
In short, the Bush administration has failed to make
its case for the war in Iraq. Now, people see and read
about what really happens in war, and towns and cities
are facing the reality of the 1,900 or so American
military deaths and well over 14,000 wounded so far
in Iraq. A June 2005 Gallup poll found that in the
past five years the proportion of Americans who said
they would support their child's entering the military
has fallen from two-thirds to about half. This has
not all happened spontaneously. Across the U.S., there
is a growing campaign against military recruitment
that is bringing parents, teachers, and peace activists
to protect students from military recruiters.
Retention Also a Problem
It is not just recruitment. The military has been
having problems keeping its soldiers. Almost 30 percent
of new recruits leave within six months. Some of this
is at least due to the vast gap between the day-to-day
experiences of young people before they join up and
the life of a recruit during training. Stories talk
of recruits who "can't eat, they literally vomit
every time they put a spoon in their mouths, they're
having nightmares." Bonuses are being offered
to encourage soldiers to re-enlist once their service
is over. It is reported that re-enlistment bonuses
can be as high as $150,000, depending on the specialty
and length of re-enlistment.
Some reports suggest the Army has started to lower
its standards for soldier performance, and so reduce
losses. The Wall Street Journal has reported a military
memo directing commanders not to dismiss soldiers for
poor fitness, unsatisfactory performance, or even for
pregnancy, alcoholism, and drug abuse.
There are problems with desertion. The Pentagon has
admitted that more than 5,500 soldiers have deserted
since the start of the Iraq war. In comparison, 1,509
deserted in 1995. The cases that have become public
have said that they did so because they are opposed
to the war. A telephone hotline to help soldiers who
want to leave the military has reported that the number
of calls it is receiving is now double of what it was
in 2001 – the hotline answered 33,000 calls last
year.
A New Army of Mercenaries?
Max Boot, a prominent military commentator, named
among "the 500 most influential people in the
United States in the field of foreign policy," has
offered his solution for the problem of finding people
to fight America's wars. In a recent article, Boot
proposed that the path to a bigger American Army lay
in offering a new deal, "Defend America, Become
American." Boot has proposed that the U.S. should
look beyond just U.S. citizens and permanent, legal
residents for soldiers to fight in its military.
He has proposed a "Development, Relief, and Education
for Alien Minors Act," a DREAM Act, as he puts
it, that would offer legal status to the children of
illegal immigrants residing in the U.S. and eligibility
for citizenship if they can meet a number of conditions,
including graduating from high school, and if they
go to college or choose to serve in the military. A
bill to this effect was introduced in the U.S. Senate
but has not been voted on yet.
Even this may not be enough, though. Like many others
who argue that America should embrace fully and enthusiastically
its imperialism, Boot believes there is a need to dramatically
increase the size of the U.S. military, and military
spending will have to rise to pay for an Army able
to put and keep troops on the ground in faraway countries.
He has proposed that the U.S. should "offer citizenship
to anyone, anywhere on the planet, willing to serve
a set term in the U.S. military."
Boot asks, "Would foreigners sign up to fight
for Uncle Sam? I don't see why not, because so many
people are desperate to move here. Serving a few years
in the military would seem a small price to pay and
it would establish beyond a doubt that they are the
kind of motivated, hardworking immigrants we want." The
nightmare of war is offered as the prelude to the "American
dream."
Tony Allwein owed $19,000, so
it sounded like a good deal when a recruiter told him
the Army would pay off his student loans if he would
enlist. Allwein, who is stationed in Germany after
spending nearly a year in Iraq, has yet to see the
money, and it's unlikely he will. The problem is that
he had loans with private lenders, and the Army only
pays off government-backed loans...
...The recruiter who the family said gave Allwein
the bad advice retired three weeks ago and is being
INVESTIGATED BY THE ARMY, according to Army officials.
Spc. 1st Class Allwein's family says they're left
with the debt and anger. The 24-year-old's mother,
Kathy Allwein of Lebanon, has joined MILITARY FAMILIES
SPEAK OUT, a group that opposes the Iraq War and
has complained about improper recruiting practices...
...According to a letter from the Army to U.S. Rep.
Tim Holden, who is trying to help the family, there
is little chance the Army will reverse its decision.
Even if the recruiter is found at fault, "the
outcome of the investigation may not have any effect
on the decision," the letter said...
... Tony Allwein, who will be returning stateside
in August, put his life on the line as the rear gunner
on a convoy in Iraq, his mother said. "My
son, after serving his country honorably, GETS SMACKED
IN THE FACE," she said.
Actual death toll of US Military
in Iraq is in excess of 8,000, “far more realistic
than the government’s current official number
of 1,800-plus,” according to ‘Deep Throat’ data
researcher Brian Harring.
Dandelion Books has just signed a contract with
TBR News www.tbrnews.org/ to publish Prelude to Disaster:
The Harring Report – Complete Official DoD
Iraq & Afghanistan US Military Casualty List,
by TBR News (www.tbrnews.org/). It will be available
in September at www.dandelionbooks.net/ , www.amazon.com/
and other participating websites.
According to Brian Harring, a computer data specialist
who obtained this report for tbrnews.org, a popular
Internet news website, of the 158,000 US Military shipped
to Iraq, 34,000 have either deserted, were killed or
seriously wounded. DoD lists currently being quietly
circulated indicate almost 9,000 dead, over 23,000
seriously wounded and a large number of suicides, forced
hospitalization for ongoing drug usage and sales, murder
of Iraqi civilians and fellow soldiers, rapes and courts
martial.
Prelude to Disaster also includes Russian daily military
intelligence reports of the Iraqi War from March 17 – April
8, 2003. “These reports are certainly far more
informative and accurate than the heavily edited and
controlled material now appearing in the various branches
of the American media,” states TBR News. “We’ve
also included Russian intelligence analysis of ‘two
enormous mistakes made by the U.S. command during the
planning stages of this war that resulted in obvious
strategic failure.’”
“President Bush personally ordered that no pictures
be taken of the coffined and flag-draped dead under
any circumstances,” says Harring. “He claims
this is to comfort the bereaved relatives, but is designed
to keep the huge number of arriving bodies secret.
“Bush has never attended any kind of a memorial
service for his dead soldiers,” states Harring. “He
never will because he is terrified some parent might
curse him in front of the press, or, worse, attack
him.”
On the fourth
anniversary of the September 11th attacks, Laura Knight-Jadczyk
announces the availability of her latest book:
In the years since the 9/11 attacks, dozens of books
have sought to explore the truth behind the official
version of events that day - yet to date, none of
these publications has provided a satisfactory answer
as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately
responsible for carrying them out.
Taking a broad, millennia-long perspective, Laura
Knight-Jadczyk's 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth uncovers the true nature of
the ruling elite on our planet and presents new and
ground-breaking insights into just how the 9/11 attacks
played out.
9/11: The Ultimate
Truth makes a strong case for the idea that September
11, 2001 marked the moment when our planet entered
the final phase of a diabolical plan that has been
many, many years in the making. It is a plan developed
and nurtured by successive generations of ruthless
individuals who relentlessly exploit the negative
aspects of basic human nature to entrap humanity as
a whole in endless wars and suffering in order to
keep us confused and distracted to the reality of
the man behind the curtain.
Drawing on historical and genealogical sources, Knight-Jadczyk
eloquently links the 9/11 event to the modern-day
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. She also cites the clear
evidence that our planet undergoes periodic natural
cataclysms, a cycle that has arguably brought humanity
to the brink of destruction in the present day.
For its no nonsense style in cutting to the core
of the issue and its sheer audacity in refusing to
be swayed or distracted by the morass of disinformation
that has been employed by the Powers that Be to cover
their tracks, 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth can rightly claim to be THE
definitive book on 9/11 - and what that fateful day's
true implications are for the future of mankind.
Published by Red Pill Press
Scheduled for release on October 1,
2005, readers can pre-order the book today at our bookstore.