|
"You get America out of Iraq and
Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism."
- Cindy Sheehan
|
P I C T U R E
O F T H E D A Y
Voie
Lactée
Copyright 2005 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
On the fourth
anniversary of the September 11th attacks, Laura Knight-Jadczyk
announces the availability of her latest book:
In the years since the 9/11 attacks, dozens of books
have sought to explore the truth behind the official
version of events that day - yet to date, none of
these publications has provided a satisfactory answer
as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately
responsible for carrying them out.
Taking a broad, millennia-long perspective, Laura
Knight-Jadczyk's 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth uncovers the true nature of
the ruling elite on our planet and presents new and
ground-breaking insights into just how the 9/11 attacks
played out.
9/11: The Ultimate
Truth makes a strong case for the idea that September
11, 2001 marked the moment when our planet entered
the final phase of a diabolical plan that has been
many, many years in the making. It is a plan developed
and nurtured by successive generations of ruthless
individuals who relentlessly exploit the negative
aspects of basic human nature to entrap humanity as
a whole in endless wars and suffering in order to
keep us confused and distracted to the reality of
the man behind the curtain.
Drawing on historical and genealogical sources, Knight-Jadczyk
eloquently links the 9/11 event to the modern-day
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. She also cites the clear
evidence that our planet undergoes periodic natural
cataclysms, a cycle that has arguably brought humanity
to the brink of destruction in the present day.
For its no nonsense style in cutting to the core
of the issue and its sheer audacity in refusing to
be swayed or distracted by the morass of disinformation
that has been employed by the Powers that Be to cover
their tracks, 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth can rightly claim to be THE
definitive book on 9/11 - and what that fateful day's
true implications are for the future of mankind.
Published by Red Pill Press
Scheduled for release on October 1,
2005, readers can pre-order the book today at our bookstore. |
The
ground-breaking and richly illustrated new book, Lost
Star of Myth and Time, marries modern astronomical
theory with ancient star lore to make a compelling case
for the profound influence on our planet of a companion
star to the sun. Author and theorist, Walter Cruttenden,
presents the evidence that this binary orbit relationship
may be the cause of a vast cycle causing the Dark and
Golden Ages common in the lore of ancient cultures.
Researching archaeological and astronomical data at
the unique think tank, the Binary
Research Institute, Cruttenden concludes that the
movement of the solar system plays a more important role
in life than people realize, and he challenges some preconceived
notions:
The phenomenon known as the precession of the equinox,
fabled as a marker of time by ancient peoples, is not
due to a local wobbling of the Earth as modern theory
portends, but to the solar system's gentle curve through
space.
This movement of the solar system occurs because the
Sun has a companion star; both stars orbit a common center
of gravity, as is typical of most double star systems.
The grand cycle–the time it takes to complete one
orbit––is called a "Great Year,"
a term coined by Plato.
Cruttenden explains the affect on earth with an analogy:
"Just as the spinning motion of the earth causes
the cycle of day and night, and just as the orbital motion
of the earth around the sun causes the cycle of the seasons,
so too does the binary motion cause a cycle of rising
and falling ages over long periods of time, due to increasing
and decreasing electromagnet effects generated by our
sun and other nearby stars."
While the findings in Lost Star are controversial, astronomers
now agree that most stars are likely part of a binary
or multiple star system. Dr. Richard
A. Muller, professor of physics at UC Berkeley and research
physicist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, is
an early proponent of a companion star to our sun; he
prefers a 26 million year orbit period. Cruttenden
uses 24,000 years and says the change in angular direction
can be seen in the precession of the equinox.
Lost Star of Myth and Time expands on the author's award-winning
PBS documentary film "The Great Year," narrated
by actor James Earl Jones. The book brings intriguing
new evidence to the theory of our binary companion star
and an age old mystery - the precession of the equinox.
|
New
Orleans provides us with a reliable template for judging
what the Bush administration will do in the event of a
massive "casualty-producing" terrorist attack.
However depressing, this is useful information.
Special military units will be deployed to the affected
areas to patrol the streets in heavily-armored vehicles;
conducting house-to-house searches according to their
own discretion.
The cities will be placed under martial law; invoking
shoot to kill orders for anyone either looting or out
of doors after the designated curfew.
Heavily-armed mercenaries and paramilitaries will be
used on various assignments that require secrecy or additional
security. We assume they will be used to protect dignitaries,
perform harsh and illegal interrogations, intimidate dissidents,
and subvert efforts by the media to provide accurate information
from the region.
A massive media campaign will be mounted to create a
narrative of an "involved and compassionate government"
providing security to their people in times of crisis.
Is this a fair description of what is taking place in
New Orleans?
There's little doubt that the Bush administration capitalized
on the hurricane to activate its strategy to militarize
the city. There's ample evidence that they had extensive
knowledge of the magnitude of the disaster, and yet, chose
to do nothing. In fact, for more than 3 days they prevented
food, water or medicine from entering the stricken city.
Here are just a few of the headlines that illustrate this
point, although there are numerous others:
"FEMA won't accept Amtrak's help in evacuations.''
"FEMA turns away experienced firefighters.''
"FEMA turns back Wal-Mart supply trucks.''
"FEMA prevents Coast Guard from delivering diesel
fuel.''
"Homeland Security won't let Red Cross deliver food.''
"FEMA bars morticians from entering New Orleans.''
"FEMA blocks 500-boat citizen flotilla from delivering
aid.''
"FEMA fails to utilize Navy ship with 600-bed hospital
on board.''
"FEMA to Chicago: Send just one truck.''
"FEMA turns away generators.''
"FEMA first responders urged not to respond.''
The administration's criminal negligence in the deaths
of hundreds if not thousands of New Orleans occupants
is not in doubt, nor is their predictable response in
countering the bad press. Michael Brown said it best when
he noted that he wanted "to convey a positive image
of disaster operations to government officials, community
organizers, and the general public."
Brown's "positive image" of the catastrophe
has been left to the usual Bush media-operatives, who
have deftly shifted the national dialogue away from "criminal
negligence" to the more benign-sounding "government
unresponsiveness" or "failure of leadership."
Neither of these have anything to do with the facts as
we now understand them. Many of the people who died in
the disaster were murdered by their government just as
surely as if Bush had personally held their heads under
water himself.
Now, the city is a fully-militarized war-zone no different
than Baghdad or Kabul. Already, reports are coming in
of doors being kicked down by armed soldiers and terrified
residents being shunted off to special detention camps
in hand cuffs.
We should not expect a different scenario
when America's major cities come under terrorist attack
sometime in the not-to-distant future.
A great deal has been written about the ethnic-cleansing
operation of New Orleans poor and black, that has paved
the way for America's flagship corporations to set up
shop in the Big Easy.
What more can I add to the volumes that have been transcribed
about this global project? Americans
have been warned that they would be treated no differently
than anyone else, and that the masters of new world order
claim no regional loyalties. New Orleans merely adds an
exclamation point to what everyone should already know.
It should be instructive to die-hard supporters of the
commander-in-chief that the military deployment was accompanied
by orders for all residents to "surrender all legally-registered
firearms" to the authorities. I can only imagine
the fidgeting at the next NRA meeting when the membership
conducts an open forum on the governments' plan to disarm
the nation in the event of a terrorist attack. I am reminded
of George Washington's sage advice:
"A free people ought not only to be armed and
disciplined but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition
to maintain independence from any who might attempt to
abuse them, which would include their own government".
Or, Thomas Jefferson:
"The constitutions of most of our states assert
that all power is inherent in the people. That it is their
right and duty to be at all times, armed."
That, of course, was before the reign of George 2 and
the hasty rescinding of the Bill of Rights. Did gun-lovers
really believe they would be spared Bush's terrible swift
sword?
The "disarming" of America is a similar ruse
to the WMD-scare that was used to invade Iraq. The New
American Century is predicated on the belief that only
the overlords will have weapons. A careful comparison
of Haiti to Iraq provides an interesting contrast in the
benefits of self-defense.
The deployment of mercenaries to the
region should be of particular concern to Americans. Currently,
more than 40,000 National Guardsman from Louisiana and
Mississippi are serving in Iraq. It would have been quite
simple to return them to their home states to meet the
needs of the tragedy. Instead, the Bush administration
chose to use exorbitantly-paid mercenaries.
Why? Is it because pacification on a large scale cannot
be accomplished without a well-paid, elite-corps of corporate-warriors
who are free to carry out orders with complete impunity?
Are mercenaries imperative for neutralizing resistance,
or is there another motive; perhaps, covert or illegal
operations directed against American citizens that require
additional secrecy?
In any event, paid killers should never be used on American
soil.
New Orleans is looking more and more like a dress rehearsal
for an ambitious cross-country strategy. It is unlikely
that any plan for militarizing the country will evolve
at a "snail's pace" of one city at a time. The
administration would have to take advantage of massive
"casualty-producing" events occurring in many
strategically important cities at the same time. (Coordinated
terrorist attacks?) This would provide the necessary cover
for the same scenario we see presently unfolding in New
Orleans.
It's worth thinking about. |
WASHINGTON - President Bush said
Tuesday that "I take responsibility" for failures
in dealing with Hurricane Katrina and said the disaster
raised broader questions about the government's ability
to respond to natural disasters as well as terror attacks.
"Katrina exposed serious problems in our response
capability at all levels of government," Bush said
at joint White House news conference with the president
of Iraq.
"To the extent the federal government
didn't fully do its job right, I take responsibility,"
Bush said.
The president was asked whether people should be worried
about the government's ability to handle another terrorist
attack given failures in responding to Katrina.
"Are we capable of dealing with a severe attack?
That's a very important question and it's in the national
interest that we find out what went on so we can better
respond," Bush replied.
He said he wanted to know both what went wrong and
what went right.
As for blunders in the federal response, "I'm
not going to defend the process going in," Bush
said. "I am going to defend the people saving lives."
He praised relief workers at all levels. "I want
people in America to understand how hard people worked
to save lives down there," he said.
Bush spoke after R. David Paulison, the new acting
director of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency, pledged to intensify
efforts to find more permanent housing for the tens
of thousands of Hurricane Katrina survivors now in shelters.
It was the closest Bush has come to publicly finding
fault with any federal officials involved in the hurricane
response, which has been widely criticized as disjointed
and slow. Some federal officials have sought to fault
state and local officials for being unprepared to cope
with the disaster.
Bush planned to address the nation
Thursday evening from Louisiana, where he will be monitoring
recovery efforts, the White House announced earlier
Tuesday.
Paulison, in his first public comments since taking
the job on Monday, told reporters: "We're going
to get those people out of the shelters, and we're going
to move and get them the help they need."
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff introduced
Paulison as the Bush administration tried to deflect
criticism for the sluggish initial federal response
to the hurricane and its disastrous aftermath.
Chertoff said that while cleanup, relief and reconstruction
from Katrina is now the government's top priority, the
administration would not let down its guard on other
potential dangers.
"The world is not going to stop moving because
we are very focused on Katrina," Chertoff said.
Paulison, named to the post on Monday, said he was
busy "getting brought up to speed."
He replaced Michael Brown, who resigned on Monday,
three days after being removed from being the top onsite
federal official in charge of the government's response.
Paulison said Bush called him Monday night and "thanked
me for coming on board."
Bush promised that he would have "the full support
of the federal government," Paulison said.
Chertoff said the relief operation had entered a new
phase.
Initially, he said, the most important priority was
evacuating people, getting them to safety, providing
food, water and medical care.
"And then ultimately at the end of the day, we
have to reconstitute the communities that have been
devastated," Chertoff added.
He said the federal government would
look increasingly to state and local officials for guidance
on rebuilding the devastated communities along the Gulf
Coast.
"The federal government can't drive permanent
solutions down the throats of state and local officials,"
Chertoff said. "I don't think anyone should envision
a situation in which they're going to take a back seat.
They're going to take a front seat," he said.
Chertoff said that teams of federal auditors were being
dispatched to the stricken areas to make sure that billions
of dollars worth of government contracts were being
properly spent. "We want to get aid to people who
need it quickly, but we also don't want to lose sight
of the importance of preserving the integrity of the
process and our responsibility as stewards of the public
money," Chertoff said.
"We're going to cut through red tape," he
said, "but we're not going to cut through laws
and rules that govern ethics."
Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said
that some military aircraft and other equipment may
be able to move out of the Gulf Coast soon.
"We've got to the point where most if not all
of the search and rescue is completed," said Rumsfeld,
who is attending a
NATO meeting in Berlin. "Some helicopters can undoubtedly
be moved out over the period ahead."
He also said there is a very large surplus of hospital
beds in the region, so those could also be decreased.
The USS Comfort hospital ship arrived near the Mississippi
coast late last week. Rumsfeld added that nothing will
be moved out of the area without the authorization of
the two states' governors, the military leaders there
and the president.
Elsewhere, workers with the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention aren't finding many sick people, even
though the specter of diseases has alarmed relief and
rescue figures. Instead, between 40 and 50 percent of
patients seeking emergency care have injuries. The CDC
has counted 148 injuries in just the last two days,
Carol Rubin, an agency hurricane relief specialist,
said by telephone from the government's new public health
headquarters in New Orleans' Kindred Hospital.
While she couldn't provide a breakdown, Rubin said
chain saw injuries and carbon monoxide exposure from
generators are among them. Those are particularly worrisome
because they're likely to become more common as additional
hurricane survivors re-enter the city in coming days,
she said.
The message: Those injuries are preventable, if people
take proper precautions, Rubin stressed. |
WASHINGTON - A spate of bills to
cut federal red tape and otherwise make it easier to
get aid to victims of Hurricane Katrina has hit a slow
patch as lawmakers wrestle over how to shape their response.
Congress zipped through bills providing $62 billion
in emergency aid to hurricane victims but the broader
legislative response is a work in progress.
Included in this second phase are proposals to provide
Medicaid health benefits to those made homeless by Katrina,
lift work rules for welfare recipients, and implement
tax changes to help hurricane victims and charitable
donors. More comprehensive bills are to follow.
Republicans are starting to voice
complaints that Democrats are seeking to seize upon
the tragedy to pass more ambitious legislation than
they otherwise could expect to achieve in the GOP-dominated
Congress.
"In some instances, (Democrats are) trying to
up the ante and use this crisis to accomplish goals
that maybe they wouldn't have otherwise been able to
accomplish without a natural disaster,"
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley,
R-Iowa, said. Grassley is at the center of the storm
as he negotiates over taxes, welfare and Medicaid.
For example, a House-passed bill to temporarily ease
rules requiring that welfare recipients work 30 hours
a week for their benefits and extend the welfare program
is still pending before the Senate, despite a big push
by Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., to clear it
for President Bush's signature. Democrats are pressing
for a more generous approach.
For their part, outgunned House Democrats have settled
on a far-reaching Katrina response plan, including housing
vouchers, increases in unemployment insurance payments
and full Medicaid coverage for hurricane victims.
Grassley has formally introduced a bipartisan tax break
plan costing up to $7 billion that would let hurricane
victims tap their retirement accounts, assist businesses
and encourage charitable donations. A House plan is
still taking shape. [...]
On Wednesday, Congress was to begin investigating the
government's readiness and response to Katrina at a
Senate
Homeland Security Committee hearing. Committee Chairwoman
Susan Collins, R-Maine, said the inquiry would investigate
the sluggish response at all levels of government.
"It's going to be an in-depth, extensive review,"
Collins said.
Democrats continue to
press for an independent, bipartisan panel modeled after
the Sept. 11 Commission and they say
congressional inquiries should not be controlled by
Republicans. [...] |
Overlooked in many
news reports about the unfolding storm disaster in the
southern United States, especially in the City of New
Orleans, in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina, is a potentially
dramatic pollution issue related to a
toxic landfill that sits under the flood waters right
in the city's downtown, according to map overlays of the
flooded area. The situation could exacerbate the
already dire threat to human health and the environment
from the flood waters.
The Agriculture Street Landfill (ASL) is situated on
a 95-acre site in New Orleans, Orleans Parish, Louisiana.
The ASL is a federally registered Superfund site, and
is on the National Priorities List of highly contaminated
sites requiring cleanup and containment. A few years ago
the site, which sits underneath and beside houses and
a school, was fenced and covered with clean soil. However,
three feet or more of flood waters could potentially cause
the landfill's toxic contents – the result of decades
of municipal and industrial waste dumping – to leach
out.
Houses and buildings that were constructed
in later years directly atop parts of the landfill. Residents
report unusual cancers and health problems and have lobbied
for years to be relocated away from the old contaminated
site, which contains not only municipal garbage, but buried
industrial wastes such as what would be produced by service
stations and dry cleaners, manufacturers or burning. The
site was routinely sprayed with DDT in the 1940s and 50s
and, in 1962, 300,000 cubic yards of excess fill were
removed from ASL because of ongoing subsurface fires.
(The site was nicknamed "Dante's Inferno" because
of the fires.)
The ASL can be thought of a sort of Love Canal for New
Orleans -– and now it sits under water.
The ASL site is three miles south of Lake Pontchartrain
and about 2.5 north-northeast of the city's central business
district (roughly halfway between the old French Quarter
and the shore of Lake Pontchartrain).
Disturbingly, the site is also very close to the Industrial
Canal Levee, a section of which collapsed and allowed
flood waters to pour in, almost directly in the direction
of the ASL site.
Government reports describe ASL as being "bounded
on the north by Higgins Boulevard and south and west by
Southern Railroads right-of-ways. The eastern boundary
of the landfill extends from the cul-de-sac at the southern
end of Clouet Street, near the railroad tracks to Higgins
Boulevard between Press and Montegut Streets."
Locate that site on a map (see
websites below), and then overlay published maps of New
Orleans flooding, and one finds the old toxic landfill
is situated right in the middle of a huge area of three-foot
flooding. That industrial area is almost continuously
connected with water to the downtown and northern areas
of the city. It's not outlandish to consider the possibility
that toxic waste from the landfill may mix with floodwaters
and spread far beyond the old landfill site.
Although the humanitarian rescue operation must take
precedence at the current time, authorities and the public
must not overlook this pollution situation, which in both
the near and long-term may be dangerous to human health
and the environment. We must hope that emergency responders
will investigate this site as soon as possible and take
steps to mitigate potential off-site migration of hazardous
materials. It may be that sandbag walls are required here,
as well as on the broken levees.
This magazine will update the situation as more information
becomes available.
Story prepared by Guy Crittenden, editor. Contact 705-445-0361
or gcrittenden@solidwastemag.com (See useful websites
below.)
Useful websites:
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/agriculturestreet/asl_p3.html
This website offers the Appendix to the government Public
Health Assessment and further technical details about
the site, plus a small map at the end.
http://www.umich.edu/~snre492/Jones/agstreet.htm
Environmental Justice Case Study website offers a detailed
description of the Agriculture Street Landfill, and the
history of pollution problems and residents seeking to
relocate:
http://www.nbc17.com/hurricanes/4887230/detail.html
NBC-17.com website offers interactive map of New Orleans
flooded areas. (Look near top of blue sidebar at right
beside main story for "Interactive: New Orleans'
Damage.")
http://maps.google.com
Google map of New Orleans can be pulled up at this website.
Enter "Higgins Blvd., New Orleans" to get the
approximate location of the landfill, then compare this
with the NBC-17 map. (Note: you can zoom in and out, and
toggle around this Google map, and also hit "satellite"
in the upper right to switch from map view to a satellite
view of the terrain.)
|
At a speech to the
Heritage Foundation yesterday, Laura Bush disclosed more
about the White House's unorthodox information-gathering
methods. Speaking about the good that has come from Katrina's
aftermath, she said, "Maybe the media hasn't shown
us that much, but we've read about it and we do know about
it." Of course -- they subscribe to the same relentlessly
optimistic paper -- The Bullshit Express -- as the Chertoff
household. "Gulf Evacuees Say Group Showers the Least
Humilating Experience Yet" was the headline the day
after it told them "New Orleans Dodged the Bullet."
And later, special guest columnist Barbara Bush observed
many evacuees "were underprivileged anyway, so this
-- this is working very well for them." Yes, the
Bullshit Express has been a font of stellar coverage,
almost as good as their Alternate Universe Pultizer Prize-winning
series, "Iraq in 2003: Mission Accomplished." |
LONDON - A handful of demonstrators
gathered outside oil depots in Britain on Wednesday
to protest against high fuel costs as France pledged
to get tough with oil companies that failed to trim
prices fast enough.
Fears of a repeat of protests that all but brought
Britain to a standstill five years ago proved unfounded,
as lorry drivers carried on working and the police ensured
tankers delivered fuel from refineries and depots as
usual.
"People are turning up and the police turning
them away," protest leader Andrew Spence told Reuters
from outside Shell's Jarrow fuel distribution center
before dawn.
Anger over high fuel prices
in Europe has been growing since a surge in crude oil
prices ramped the cost of petrol at filling stations.
Governments have put pressure on oil companies
to trim the cost of fuel.
French Finance Minister Thierry Breton said on Wednesday
that firms could do more to help people cope with surging
prices and that he would meet large oil companies on
Friday to discuss how they could help customers.
"As soon as there is a fall in prices, I want
this fall to be passed on immediately and that's exactly
what I want to discuss with them, so that they don't
keep the drop for themselves instead of returning it
to consumers," Breton said.
Crude oil prices hit a record of more than $70 a barrel
two weeks ago after more than half of U.S. oil production
in the Gulf of Mexico was shut down by Hurricane Katrina.
Prices have since subsided to $63 a barrel.
Breton's calls echoed similar pleas this week by French
President Jacques Chirac and Prime Minister Dominique
de Villepin and came two days after Austria's finance
minister asked oil companies there to trim prices.
LOCAL MEASURES
In Austria, oil majors BP and Shell lowered petrol
and diesel prices the day after the government call
but said the move was to match declines in world prices,
not a result of political pressure.
A BP spokesman in France also responded to Chirac's
pressure for further cuts by saying pump prices are
ruled by moves on international markets and that high
taxes eat away at profits.
But governments, whose taxation of motor fuels often
accounts for about 70 percent of the pump price, were
determined to put the focus on oil firms and oil-producing
countries.
British Finance Minister Gordon Brown called on the
Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)
on Tuesday to pump more oil although most OPEC members
are already operating close to full capacity.
Only Saudi Arabia has significant spare capacity but
its crude is not suitable for refiners to process into
transport fuels and the closure of U.S. refineries by
Katrina means OPEC is struggling to find buyers for
more supplies on world markets.
European Union governments have agreed not to offer
blanket reductions in fuel taxes to ease political pressure
and have instead focused on localized palliative measures.
France announced tax breaks of 30 million euros a day
for farmers after minor protests in the north by farmers
on bicycles and truckers driving along motorways at
snail's pace.
The Irish Road Haulage Association was awaiting talks
on Thursday with the Irish government to seek a rebate
scheme and Irish taxi drivers sought permission to add
50 euro cents to their fares to offset fuel costs.
BRITISH PROTESTS
Britain, itself an oil producer, has been particularly
prone to protests as motorists pay more for their fuel
than elsewhere in Europe because its fuel taxes are
higher.
The cost of a liter of petrol climbed above 1 pound
in some areas last week after world prices rose. The
government takes three quarters of every pound spent
on fuel in tax.
British protesters demonstrating on Wednesday want
the government to cut taxes, but Britain has ruled that
out.
But the absence of major protests on Wednesday did
not stop panicked British drivers, still scarred from
the turmoil caused by blockades in 2000, from lining
up outside filling stations.
"We're in a process now of replenishing.
We had coming up on a week's worth of buying in one
day," said Chris Hunt, director general of the
UK Petroleum Industry Association.
"The panic buying tends to be a blip. Once you've
filled your tank you can't fill it up again." |
PARIS - Some 300 foreign tourists,
French customers and employees were evacuated from one
of the top hotels in Paris on Wednesday after an anonymous
caller made a bogus bomb warning, police said.
The Hôtel Lutetia, an elegant establishment in
the upmarket 6th district in the centre of the city,
was ordered emptied after the hotel's switchboard received
the call.
A careful search by officers turned up no suspicious
device. |
Who
are the Real Terrorists? |
by Dr. MAHATHIR MOHAMAD
Former Prime Minister of Malaysia
[Speech delivered on Friday, 9 September 2005 at the Human
Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam - www.suhakam.org.my)
"Malaysian Human Rights Day 2005 Conference: Human
Rights and Globalization" in Le Meridien, Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia.] |
(AdeebPress.com) -
I would like to thank Suhakam for this honor to address
you on a subject that you have more knowledge and experience
than I do.
You are concerned with Human Rights or Hak Asasi Manusia.
And it is only right that as a civilized society and nation
we should all be concerned with human rights in our country
and in fact in the world.
But human rights should be upheld because
they can contribute to a better quality of life. To kill
100,000 people because you suspect that the human rights
of a few have been denied seems to be a contradiction.
Yet the fanaticism of the champions of human rights have
led to more people being deprived from their rights and
many their lives than the number saved. It seems to me
that we have lost our sense of proportion.
With civilizational advances it is only right that the
human community try to distinguish itself more and more
from those of the other creatures created by God which
are unable to think, to reason and to overcome the influence
of basic desires and feelings. Submission to the strong
and the powerful was right in the animal world and in
primitive human societies. But the
more advance the society the greater should be the capacity
to think, to recognize and evaluate between right and
wrong and to choose between these based on higher reasoning
power and not just basic feelings and desires.
The world today is, in the sense
of the ability to make right choices, still very primitive.
For example those who claim to be the most civilized still
believe that the misfortune which befall them as a result
of the actions by their enemies are wrong but the misfortune
that they inflict on their enemies are right. This is
seen from the concern and anger over the death of 1,700
U.S. soldiers in Iraq but the death of a hundred times
more of Iraqis as a result of the military invasion and
occupation of Iraq and the civil war precipitated by the
imposition of democratic elections are not even mentioned.
There is no tally of Iraqi deaths but every single death
of a U.S. soldier is reported to the world. These
are soldiers who must expect to be killed. But the Iraqis
who die because of U.S. action or the civil war in Iraq
that the U.S. has precipitated are innocent civilians
who under the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein would be
alive.
You and I read reports of the death of Iraqis with equanimity
as if it is right and just. You and I do not react with
anger and horror over this injustice, this abuse of the
rights of the Iraqis to live, to be free from terror including
state-initiated-terror.
Prior to the invasion of Iraq on false pretences, 500,000
infants died because sanctions deprived them of medicine
and food. Asked by the press, Madeleine Albright, the
U.S. Secretary of State, whether she thought the price
was not too high for stopping Saddam Hussein's dictatorship,
she said it was difficult but the price (death of 500,000
children) was worth it.
At the time this was happening where
were the people who are concerned with human rights? Did
they expose the abuses of Britain and America? Did they
protest against their own Governments? No. It is because
they, the enemy are killed. That is acceptable. But their
own people must not be killed. To kill them is to commit
acts of terror.
Yet what is an act of terror. Isn't it
any act that terrifies people? Are not the people terrified
at the idea of being bombed and killed? Those who are
to be killed by exploding bombs know they would have their
bodies torn from their heads and limbs. Some will die
instantly no doubt.
But many would not. They would feel their
limbs being torn from their bodies, their guts spilled
on the ground through their torned abdomen. They would
wait in terrible pain for help which may not come. And
they would again experience the terror, expecting the
next bomb or rocket. And those who survive would know
the terror of what would, what could happen to them personally
when the bombers come again, tomorrow, the day after,
the weak or month after. They would know that they could
be next to have their heads torn off from their bodies,
their limbs too.
They would know that they would die violently
or they would survive in horrible pain, minus arms, minus
legs, maimed forever. And yet the bombings would go on.
In Iraq for ten years between the Gulf War and the Iraq
invasion, the people lived in terrible fear. They were
terrorized. Have they any rights? Did the people of the
world care?
The British and American bomber pilots came, unopposed,
safe and cosy in their state-of-the-art aircrafts, pressing
buttons to drop bombs, to kill and maim real people who
were their targets, just targets. And these murderers,
for that is what they are, would go back to celebrate
"Mission Accomplished".
Who are the terrorists? The people below
who were bombed or the bombers? Whose rights have been
snatched away?
I relate this because there are not just double standards
where human rights are concerned, there are multiple standards.
Rightly we should be concerned whether prisoners and detained
foreign workers in this country are treated well or not.
We should be concerned whether everyone can exercise his
right to vote or not, whether the food given to detainees
are wholesome or not, indeed whether detention without
trial is a violation of human rights or not.
But the people whose hands are soaked in the blood of
the innocents -- the blood of the Iraqis, the Afghans,
the Panamanians, the Nicaraguans, the Chileans, the Ecuadorians;
the people who assassinated the Presidents of Panama,
Chile, Ecuador; the people who ignored international law
and mounted military attacks, invading and killing hundreds
of Panamanian in order to arrest Noriega and to try him
not under Panamanian laws but under their own country's
law -- have these people a right to question human rights
in our country, to make a list and grade the human rights
record of the countries of the world yearly, these people
with blood-soaked hands?
They have not questioned the blatant
abuses of human rights in countries which are friendly
to them. In fact they provide the means for these countries
to indulge in human rights abuses.
Israel is provided with weapons, helicopter
gun ships, bullets coated with depleted uranium to wage
war against people whose only way to retaliate is by committing
suicide bombing. The Israeli soldiers were well-protected
with body armor, operated from armored tanks and armored
bull-dozers, to rocket and bomb the Palestinians and demolish
their houses while the occupants were still inside.
Israel has nuclear weapons but it was
provided with bombers to bomb so-called nuclear research
facilities in other countries. And as with American and
British actions, the Israeli bombs and rockets tore up
the living Palestinians, Iraqis and soon Syrians and Iranians,
without the slightest consideration that the people they
killed have rights, have human rights to their lives,
to security and peace.
Then there are other friends of these terrorist nations
who abuse the rights of their own people, deny them even
the simplest democratic rights, jailing and executing
their people without fair trial but are not criticized
or condemned.
But when countries are not friendly with
these great powers, their governments claim they have
a right to expend money to subvert the Government, to
support the NGOs to overthrow the Government, to ensure
only candidates willing to submit to them win. Already
we are seeing elections in which candidates wanting to
stay independent being rejected while only those ready
to submit to these powers being allowed to contest and
to win.
There was a time when nations pledged not to interfere
in the internal affairs of other countries. As a result
many authoritarian regimes emerged which committed terrible
atrocities. Cambodia and Pol Pot is a case in mind. Because
of the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs
of countries, 2 million Cambodians died horrible deaths.
There is a case for interference. But who determines
when there is a case? Is this right to be given to a particular
super power? If so can we be assured the super power would
act in the best interest of the country concerned, in
order to uphold human rights?
Saddam Hussein was tried by the media and found guilty
of oppressing his people. But that was not the excuse
for invading Iraq. The excuse was that Iraq threatened
the world with Weapons of Mass Destruction. Specifically,
Britain was supposed to be threatened with WMD capable
of hitting it within 15 minutes of the order being given
by Saddam.
As we all know it was a lie. Every agency tasked with
verifying the accusation that Saddam had weapons of mass
destruction could not prove it. Even the intelligence
agencies of the U.S. and Britain said that there was no
weapon of mass destruction that Saddam could threaten
the U.S. or Britain or the world with. And today after
months of thorough search without Saddam and his people
getting in the way, no WMD has been found.
Yet the U.S. and UK took it upon themselves to invade
Iraq in order to remove an allegedly authoritarian Government.
The result of the invasion is that
many more people have been killed and injured than Saddam
was ever accused of. Worse still, the powers which are
supposed to save the Iraqi people have broken international
laws on human rights, by detaining Iraqis and others and
torturing them at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and elsewhere.
So can we accept that these big powers alone have a right
to determine when to interfere in the internal affairs
of other countries to protect human rights?
Malaysia is concerned about human rights within its borders.
It does not need the interference of foreign powers before
it sets up Suhakam, a body dedicated to overseeing and
ensuring that there are no abuses of human rights within
its borders.
People in Malaysia seem to be quite happy. They can work
and do business and make as much money as they like. There
is no restriction on the freedom to move about, to go
abroad even.
They have political parties which they are free to join,
whether these are pro-Government or anti-Government. They
can read newspapers which support or oppose the Government.
While the local electronic media is supportive of the
Government, no one is prevented from watching or listening
to foreign broadcasts which are mostly critical of the
Government. Foreign newspapers and magazines are freely
available. In fact many foreign papers, like the Herald
Tribune and Asian Wall Street Journal are printed in Malaysia
and are freely available to Malaysians. Then there is
the Internet which no one seems able to stop even if libelous
lies are screened.
Periodically, without fail there would be elections in
Malaysia. Anyone and everyone can participate in these
elections. The campaigns by both sides are vigorous and
hard-hitting. And the results show quite clearly that
despite accusations against the Government of undemocratic
practices, many opposition candidates would win. In fact
several states were lost to the opposition parties. Not
one of the winning opposition candidates has been charged
in court and found guilty of some minor breaches of the
election procedure and prevented from taking his seat
in Parliament as happens in a certain country.
But all these notwithstanding, Malaysia is accused of
having a totalitarian Government during the 22 years of
my Premiership. That I had released detainees on assumption
of office as Prime Minister and I had used the [Internal
Security Act] ISA sparingly does not mitigate against
the accusation that I was a dictator, an abuser of human
rights.
And not using the ISA, not detaining a person without
trial would not help either. And so when a former DPM
[Anwar Ibrahim] was charged in courts, defended by 9 lawyers
and found guilty through due process, all that was said
was that there was a conspiracy, the court was influenced
and manipulated and the trial was a sham. So you are damned
if you use the ISA, and you are damned if you don't use
the ISA.
In the eyes of these self-appointed judges
of human behavior worldwide, you can never be right no
matter what you do, if you are not liked by them. If you
are liked by them a court decision in your favor, even
on laughable grounds would be right.
Those are the people who now seem to appropriate to themselves
the right to lay down the ground rules for human rights
and who have appointed themselves as the overseers of
human rights credentials of the world.
And now these same people have come
up with what they call globalization. In the first place
who has the right to propose and interpret globalization?
It is certain that globalization was not conceived by
the poor countries. It was conceived, interpreted and
initiated by the rich.
The globalized world is to be without
borders. But if countries have no borders surely the first
thing that should happen is that people would be able
to move from one country to another without any conditions,
without papers and passports. The poor people in the poor
countries should be able to migrate to the rich countries
where there are jobs and opportunities.
But it has been made clear that globalization,
borderlessness are not for people but for capital, for
currency traders, for corporations, for banks, for NGOs
concerned over so-called human rights abuses, over lack
of democracy, etc. The flow is as you can see only in
one direction. The border crossing will be done by the
rich so as to be able to benefit their business, banks,
currency traders, their NGOs, for human rights and for
democracy.
There will be no flows in the opposite direction, from
the poor countries to the rich, the flow of poor people
in search of jobs, the NGOs concerned with human rights
abuses in the rich and powerful countries where the media
self-censors to promote certain parties, where dubious
voting results are validated by tame courts. There will
be no flow of colored people to white countries. If they
succeed they would be apprehended and sent to isolated
islands in the middle of the ocean or if they manage to
land they would be accommodated behind razorwire fence.
Is it all very democratic and caring for the rights of
man?
If we care to look back we will
recognize globalization for what it is. It is really
not a new idea at all. Globalization of trade took place
when the ethnic Europeans found the sea passages to the
West and to the East. They wanted trade but they came
as armed merchantmen with guns and invaded, conquered
and colonized their trading partners.
If the indigenous people were weak, they would just be
liquidated, shot on sight, their land taken and new ethnic
European countries set up. Otherwise, they would be made
a part of empires where the sun never sets, their resources
exploited and their people treated with disdain.
The map of the world today shows the effect of globalization,
as interpreted by the ethnic Europeans in history. There
was no U.S., Canada, Australia, Latin America, New Zealand
until the Europeans discovered the sea passages and started
global trade.
Before the Europeans there were Arab,
Indian, Chinese and Turkic traders. There was no conquest
or colonization when these people sailed the seas to trade.
Only when the Europeans carried out world trade were countries
invaded, human rights abused, genocide committed, empires
built and new ethnic European nations created on land
belonging to others.
These are historical facts. Would today's globalization
not result in weak countries being colonized again, new
empires created and the world totally hegemonized. Would
today's globalization not result in human rights abuses?
In today's world 20% of the people own 80% of the wealth.
Almost 2 billion people live on 1 US Dollar a day. They
don't have enough food or clothing or a proper roof over
their heads. In winter many of these people would freeze
to death. The people of the powerful countries are concerned
about our abuses of human rights. But shouldn't we be
concerned over the uneven distribution of wealth which
deprived 2 billion people of their rights to a decent
living, deprived by the avarice of those people who seem
so concerned about us and the unintended occasional lapses
that has resulted in abuse of human rights in our country?
We should condemn human rights abuses
in our country but we must be wary of the people who want
to destabilize us because we are too independent and we
have largely succeeded in giving our people a good life,
and despite all the criticism we are more democratic than
most of the friends of the powerful nations of the world.
The globalization of concern for
the poor and the oppressed is sheer hypocrisy.
If these people who appear to be concerned are faced with
the situation that we in Malaysia have to face sometimes,
their reactions and responses are much worse than us.
At Guantanamo detention camp the detainees, some of whom
are not even remotely connected with terrorism, are tortured
and humiliated. At Abu Gharib the most senior officers
actually sanctioned the inhuman treatment of the detainees.
When forced by world opinion to take action against those
responsible for these reprehensible acts, the culprits
were either found not guilty or given light sentences.
They were tried by their own courts under their own laws.
Their victims were not represented. The countries where
the crimes were committed were denied jurisdiction. Altogether
the whole process was so much eye-wash. Yet these are
the countries and the people who claim that Malaysian
courts are manipulated by the Government, that abuses
of rights are rampant in Malaysia. And Malaysian NGOs,
media and others lapped it up.
We must fight against abuses of human rights. We must
fight for human rights. But we must not take away the
rights of others, the rights of the majority. We must
not kill them, invade and destroy their countries in the
name of human rights. Just as many wrong things are done
in the name of Islam and also other religions, worse things
are being done in the name of democracy and human rights.
We must have a proper perspective of things. Two wrongs
do not make one right. Remember the community have rights
too, not just the individual or the minority.
We have gained political independence but for many the
minds are still colonized. |
KUALA LUMPUR: Three
European diplomats walked out of the conference hall during
Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's speech when he criticised US
and British policies on Iraq.
His comments that the American and British-led invasion
of Iraq was based on lies that the country possessed weapons
of mass destruction did not go down well with British
High Commissioner Bruce Cleghorn, Hungarian ambassador
Tamas Toth and Dutch deputy ambassador Luc Schillings,
who got up and left.
The former prime minister was speaking at a conference
on human rights organised by the Human Rights Commission
of Malaysia (Suhakam) which was attended by about 350
participants.
"The British and American bomber pilots came, unopposed,
safe and cosy in their state-of-the-art aircraft, pressing
buttons to drop bombs, to kill and maim real people who
were their targets, just targets.
"And these murderers, for that is what they are,
would go back to celebrate mission accomplished,"
Dr Mahathir said.
At a press conference later, when asked
what he thought of the diplomats walking out, he said:
"Well! I am sorry. As much as they have the right
to criticise me, they should give me the right to criticise
them.
"But if you don't want to hear
my criticisms of them, then you are denying my right to
speak up."
Dr Mahathir added that there was no tally of Iraqi deaths
but every single death of an American was reported to
the world.
"These are soldiers who must expect to be killed.
But the Iraqis who died because of US action or the civil
war in Iraq that the US precipitated were innocent civilians
who under the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein would have
been alive.
"You and I read reports of the death of Iraqis with
equanimity as if it is right and just. You and I do not
react with anger and horror over this injustice, this
abuse of the rights of the Iraqis to live, to be free
from terror including state-initiated terror," he
said.
When Cleghorn was asked to comment on his walkout, he
issued a statement: "I was invited by Suhakam to
attend the opening of their Human Rights Day conference.
"I accepted out of respect for Suhakam and for Tun
Dr Mahathir.
"Unfortunately I found myself listening to abuse
and misrepresentation about my country. I therefore left."
Suhakam commissioner Prof Datuk Hamdan Adnan said the
walkout was "very, very distasteful."
"If they claim to subscribe to the
democratic process, why can't they listen?" he asked. |
At least 81 people
have been killed and more than 160 injured in a car bomb
attack in the mainly Shia Kadhimiya area of Baghdad, Iraqi
police say.
A suicide bomber reportedly targeted crowds of labourers
in a public square.
During the night, gunmen killed 17 people in the nearby
town of Taji after dragging them from their homes and
shooting them in the street outside.
The violence occurred as a final draft of the Iraqi constitution
was handed to the UN for printing and distribution.
After months of negotiations the draft is due to be distributed
to Iraqis before a referendum on it in mid-October.
The deputy speaker of Iraq's national assembly, Hussein
al-Shahristani, said the final version of the document
contained some changes, including a statement that Iraq
was committed to the charter of the Arab League and the
provision of two, rather than three, deputy prime ministers.
Labourers targeted
The car bomb attack in Baghdad was the deadliest in Iraq
for several weeks.
A suicide bomber drove his car at 0630 (0230 GMT) into
queues of labourers who had gathered on Baghdad's Oruba
Square, Iraqi police spokesman Maj Musa Abdel Kerim said.
The BBC's Richard Galpin in Baghdad says that every day
large numbers of construction workers gather in the square
in the north of the city, waiting to be picked up by their
employers.
According to some reports the attacker lured the workers
towards the vehicle before detonating the bomb, our correspondent
adds.
"We gathered and suddenly a car blew up and turned
the area into fire and dust and darkness," one of
the workers, a man named Hadi, told Reuters news agency.
The many wounded were taken to at least four different
hospitals. Officials have warned that many of them were
so severely wounded that they are unlikely to survive.
About two hours later a car bomb hit a US military convoy
in the east of the city, injuring two soldiers. Their
condition is not yet known. [...] |
The draft Iraqi constitution
deserves much more public discussion in America as well
as in Iraq. As an economist who analyzes democratic constitutional
structures, I'd like to offer a few comments.
In most of the text, the constitution seems to establish
a reasonably standard parliamentary system, with a unicameral
legislature, a Prime Minister who heads the cabinet, and
a weak ceremonial President. But there are two nonstandard
provisions in the constitution that deserve much more analysis:
the provision for creating regional governments (Articles
113-121), and the amendment in Article 135 that establishes
the Presidential Council.
The specific procedures for uniting provinces into larger
regions are left to be defined by an act of the legislature
in its first session. But the constitution encourages provinces
to merge themselves into such regions by offering guarantees
of greater constitutional autonomy to merged regional governments.
Carried to America, these regional-merger provisions would
allow the southern states, or the northern blue states,
to combine themselves into a great regional mega-state.
Near the end of the draft constitution, Article 135 abruptly
announces that the President previously described will be
replaced by a three-person Presidential Council, which must
be elected by a 2/3 majority of the legislature. Any legislation
that is not unanimously approved by the Presidential Council
will be effectively vetoed unless it gets 3/5 approval in
the legislature. This extraordinary provision, presented
at the end of the constitution almost as an afterthought,
seems designed to create deadlock in the central government,
perhaps to guarantee that the real business of government
will be done only at the regional level.
In 2002, the Iraqi authors of the "Final Report on the Transition
to Democracy in Iraq" argued persuasively that a successful
establishment of democracy in Iraq would require some form
of federalism. But I fear that the regional-government and
presidential-council provisions of this draft constitution
may be aimed at creating, not a federal balance of power
between central and local governments, but a system of effectively
unitary governments in the regions of Iraq.
When we evaluate the constitutional provisions for creating
regional governments, we should compare them to the alternative
of simply offering the same guarantees of constitutional
autonomy to the 18 existing provinces of Iraq. Compared
to such a provincial federalist system, it is hard to see
who would benefit from the creation of these larger regional
governments, except for the politicians who hope to lead
them.
Merging provinces into larger regions cannot increase the
ability of local governments to adapt to local conditions.
In the American federal system with its 50 states, the leaders
of southern and northern states already have the ability
to adapt their local administrative practices to their local
variations of our southern and northern subcultures. Merging
our state governments into larger regional mega-states could
only decrease local adaptability. But such mergers could
also seriously increase the possibility of secession. The
leader of a regional mega-state that included a large fraction
of America's population and resources would perceive more
benefits and fewer risks in contemplating secession from
the Union than any state governor would today.
In a well-designed federal system, the existence of small
autonomous local governments can improve the performance
of national democracy, because politicians in a federal
democracy can prove their credentials for national leadership
by serving successfully as leaders of autonomous local governments.
Americans have regularly found strong candidates for president
among our state governors. This effect of federalism on
national elections may be particularly important for new
democracies, where candidates with good reputations for
responsible democratic service are likely to be scarce.
For example, the PRI's long grip on national power in Mexico
was broken by an independent state governor.
From this perspective, an ideal federal system would grant
substantial autonomous power to local governments that are
relatively small but are just large enough that successful
management of a local government can demonstrate strong
qualifications for national leadership. Given provinces
that have this minimal size, the effects of merging provinces
would be to decrease the number of such independent local
leaders and to increase the chances of regional secession.
So the principal beneficiaries of such mergers would be
the politicians who expect to become leaders of the separate
regions. Roger
B. Myerson
W.C.Norby Professor of Economics
Department of Economics
University of Chicago
1126 East 59th Street Chicago, IL 60637
N.B. This
discussion is based on the Associated Press's English translation
of the draft Iraqi constitution, published by the New York
Times on August 28, 2005. |
FORT BLISS, Texas - An Army officer
and two more of his soldiers from a reserve unit have
been charged in a prisoner abuse investigation in Afghanistan,
the Army announced Tuesday.
Capt. Christopher M. Beiring, who led the Cincinnati-based
377th Military Police Company, was charged with dereliction
of duty and making a false official statement. He is
the first officer to be charged in the investigation.
Investigators claim Beiring did not properly train
or supervise soldiers under his command in legal uses
of force, according to documents released by the Army.
He also is accused of failing to take steps to correct
the soldiers' actions - as directed by his superior
and a legal adviser - after a detainee died at a detention
center at Bagram Airfield. In addition, Beiring allegedly
lied about training his soldiers received.
Also charged were Staff Sgt. Brian L. Doyle and Sgt.
Duane M. Grubb, both from the same reserve unit Beiring
commanded.
A Fort Bliss spokesman said Tuesday he did not know
whether the men had lawyers yet.
Doyle faces charges of dereliction of duty and maltreatment.
Investigators said he did not properly provide use-of-force
guidance to his soldiers and ordered two lower-ranking
soldiers to hit a detainee known as Habibullah, who
later died.
Grubb is accused of assault, maltreatment and making
a false official statement for allegedly hitting a detainee
known as Zarif Khan at least once in the leg and later
lying about it.
All three soldiers are expected to be brought to Fort
Bliss soon, a fort spokesman said Tuesday. Hearing dates
have not been scheduled.
Nine other enlisted soldiers have also faced charges
in the abuse cases, which primarily revolved around
two detainees who died at the detention center.
Habibullah, the first prisoner to die at the Bagram
detention center, was found in his cell just days after
being taken into U.S. custody in December 2002. A second
detainee, Dilawar, arrived at Bagram the day after Habibullah
died. Dilawar died about a week later.
Pvt. Willie V. Brand, a reservist from the 377th MP
Company who was convicted of a host of charges related
to Dilawar's beating, was initially charged with the
detainee's death, but that charge was dropped. A
military jury spared Brand jail time, instead ordering
a reduction in rank and pay.
Four soldiers, including two military intelligence
interrogators from the 519th MI Battalion at Fort Bragg,
N.C., pleaded guilty to abuse charges. All but Sgt.
Selena M. Salcedo were sentenced to prison time and
given bad-conduct discharges.
Salcedo was reduced in rank
to specialist or corporal and fined $250 a month for
four months. A third interrogator, Sgt. Joshua
Claus, has announced his intention to plead guilty later
this month.
Two soldiers, MP reservist sergeants Darin Broady and
Christopher Greatorex, were acquitted last week of charges
that they beat Habibullah and later lied about it. |
Japan and the United States are
finalizing a new plan to relocate an air base on the
southern island chain of Okinawa that has long been
the target of local opposition, a newspaper reports.
The United States has already agreed to move the Futenma
Air Base out of the crowded urban center of Ginowan,
where residents complain it causes too much noise.
But the alternative location of building off the shore
of the quiet Okinawan fishing town of Heneko has also
faced protests, in part because environmentalists say
the area is a habitat for an endangered sea cow.
The Yomiuri Shimbun paper, quoting unnamed government
sources, said the two sides were close to agreement
to build the airplane facilities at existing Camp Schwab,
a major Marine base in the Okinawan city of Nago.
The plan could be carried out more quickly than the
original idea of the offshore base in Heneko, which
would take at least 12 years to build, meaning Japan
could take over Futenma sooner, the Yomiuri said.
It said the plan would be included in an interim report
on the realignment of US forces in Japan.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Hiroyuki Hosoda, the Japanese
government spokesman, denied an agreement has been reached,
saying: "We are not in a position to propose a
specific plan."
Defense Agency chief Yoshinori Ono said Tuesday that
a realignment plan would likely be ready in October
after being stalled for a month by Japan's snap general
election.
Okinawa, which accounts for less than
one percent of Japan's land mass, remains the base for
65 percent of the 40,500 US troops in the country, and
is next to the potential conflict area of the Taiwan
Strait.
Okinawa sees frequent protests against the US troops,
who are stationed in officially pacifist Japan by treaty,
blaming them for noise and crime.
Plans to shift troops out of Okinawa have made little
headway with few other communities willing to host them. |
Predictably, the mainstream
press featured screaming headlines of "blazing" synagogues
set by rabid Pals: "Synagogues burned as Israel Exits Gaza,"
appeared as a head on Yahoo's Main News Page, while this
lead
appeared from Reuters: "Jubilant Palestinians planted flags
on the rubble of Jewish settlements and set synagogues ablaze
on Monday as Israeli troops pulled out of the Gaza Strip
after 38 years of occupation." What a stroke of brilliance
to leave the empty synagogues behind. It should be all too
obvious to anyone with at least half of his/her functioning
brain cells that the Zionists calculated a few "blazing
synagogues" would result in groovy press for the retreating
Israelis and the usual dehumanisation of the Pals. The western
press never disappoints.
Unfortunately, one Palestinian was
killed. And Palestine Center for Human Rights, Gaza,
reports that six drowned at a Khan
Yunis Beach.
Laila El-Haddad writes in Raising
Yousuf that EU and PA officials reported "everything
has been destroyed [by colonists], uprooted, ripped out,
or looted."
She writes further, "Sabri Saidam, Minister of Telecommunications,
compared it to the Katrina disaster zone."
There is more. "An European official I spoke with said even
the greenhouses-for which the settlers were PAID something
like $40 million to keep, were dismantled-only the tarp
and wire was kept in tact, everything IN the greenhouses
was destroyed or taken back. " He told me some
settlers came back in and offered to 're-sell' the machinery
that kept the greenhouses going.Everything was taken out,
even light sockets. Trees were uprooted, electricity lines
were cut, and vegetation was not watered for 15 days leaving
a 'scorched earth.' The official also told me how he saw
so-called sewage treatment facilities: 'basically it was
one big septic tank-the sewage was dumped onto gaza dunes,
and filtered into the Coastal aquifer.'"
Imagine that. I guess that The Los Angeles Times must
have been too busy checking out the blazing synagogues that
no longer had their religious artifacts in them to bother
to include some concrete details about the colonists'
shenanigans. Their headline: "Gazans
Burn Synagogues in Israelis' Soldiers Wake."
The AP's
Ravi Nessman and Miriam Fam exert a bit of patience
and wait until the second paragraph to wax about the blazing
synagogues. In the ninth and tenth paragraphs they get around
to the dead Palestinians. No matter, though; this is the
way of the world as Hurricane Katrina so baldly shows; people
are expendable, property is paramount.
As Israeli "disengages" the corporate press engages in its
business as usual, offering little insight, serving up the
usual dehumanised Palestinians, and ignoring the fact that
Gaza remains a prison that no one may enter or leave without
extreme
difficulty. |
Plans to reform NHS
care outside of hospitals are being drawn up at a regional
forum based on those which help
shape health policy in the US.
The Department of Health consultation comes ahead of
a white paper next year and allows the public to pitch
ideas.
The first of four regional meetings is starting in Gateshead
with 100 people being paid to come up with ideas for GP,
pharmacy and sex health services.
Further forums will follow in London, Leicester, Plymouth
and Birmingham.
But patient representatives questioned the need to pay
people £75 a day to take part. [...]
The meetings are based on US-style "town hall"
meetings which have been run for the last 10 years by
a not-for-profit organisation called America
Speaks.
An online consultation is also starting to allow anyone
to contribute.
Simon Williams, director of policy at the Patients Association,
said reform of primary care was need to make it more "patient
focused".
But he said: "I am all for innovative ways of involving
the public, but do we really need to be paying money to
get people to have their say? Is this the best use of
money?" |
BEIJING, Sept. 14
(Xinhuanet) -- Zhong Nanshan, an
academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering and
a hero in fighting against SARS, warned that a large-scale
global-wide outbreak of flu is likely to happen at any
time given the current conditions.
"But we can't pin down a specific time for the
outbreak so far," Zhong was quoted as saying by Wednesday's
Information Time.
He said a global flu generally takes place every 20
to 50 years and now the time is more than 20 years after
the flu outbreak last time.
"It's bird flu that renders the current situation
so serious," said Zhong, fearing a mutated flu viruses
might present a more dangerous threat.
"To date, we still can't tell whether bird flu
viruses can join human flu viruses to create some viruses
that could live easier inside humans," he said.
"The case could be still more terrible if one contracts
both human and bird flu at the same time," he said.
"If there are some viruses that are able to jump
from human to human, I'm afraid that could pose a catastrophic
disaster for human beings."
He recommended people get inoculated against the flu
during the September-October period, the time immediately
before flu outbreak season.
The old, children, patients and medical workers, who
have proved to be particularly vulnerable to infection,
are strongly suggested to take inoculate bacterins as
earlier as possible, he said.
According to Zhong, flu viruses mutate almost every
year. This year, "the a type viruses would be H1N1
and H3N2 ones and the B type be Shanghai viruses."
Mutation means the antibodies created by bacterins taken
in the past may not ward off new flu strains, he said.
"Inoculation is the most effective way to prevent
flu contraction," he said. |
A researcher at Rochester
Institute of Technology is unraveling a mystery surrounding
Easter Island. William Basener, assistant professor of
mathematics, has created the first mathematical formula
to accurately model the island's monumental societal collapse.
Between 1200 and 1500 A.D., the small, remote island,
2,000 miles off the coast of Chile, was inhabited by over
10,000 people and had a relatively sophisticated and technologically
advanced society. During this time, inhabitants used large
boats for fishing and navigation, constructed numerous
buildings and built many of the large statues, known as
Tiki Gods, for which the island is now best known. However,
by the late 18th century, when European explorers first
discovered the island, the population had dropped to 2,000
and islanders were living in near primitive conditions,
with almost all elements of the previous society completely
wiped out.
"The reasons behind the Easter Island population
crash are complex but do stem from the fact that the inhabitants
eventually ran out of finite resources, including food
and building materials, causing a massive famine and the
collapse of their society," Basener says. "Unfortunately,
none of the current mathematical models used to study
population development predict this sort of growth and
quick decay in human communities."
Population scientists use differential equation models
to mimic the development of a society and predict how
that population will change over time. Since incidents
like Easter Island do not follow the normal progression
of most societies, entirely new equations were needed
to model the outcome. Computer simulations using Basener's
formula predict values very close to the actual archeological
findings on Easter Island. His team's results were recently
published in SIAM Journal of Applied Math.
Basener will next use his formula to analyze the collapse
of the Mayan and Viking populations. He also hopes to
modify his work to predict population changes in modern
day societies.
"It is my hope this research can be used to create
a better understanding of past societies," Basener
adds. "It will also eventually help scientists and
governments develop better population management skills
to avert future famines and population collapses."
Basener's research was done in collaboration with David
Ross, visiting professor of mathematics at the University
of Virginia, mathematicians Bernie Brooks, Mike Radin
and Tamas Wiandt and a group of RIT mathematics students.
|
NAGS HEAD, N.C. - Hurricane Ophelia
edged toward North Carolina early Wednesday, but many
in the storm's path shrugged at the threat of flooding
rain and wind even as officials urged them to evacuate.
The National Hurricane Center
upgraded the storm's status from a tropical storm to
a Category 1 hurricane Tuesday, saying maximum
sustained winds had reached 75 mph, with higher gusts.
Further strengthening was possible.
Unlike Hurricane Katrina, which made a head-on charge
at the Gulf Coast two weeks ago, Ophelia has meandered
since forming off the Florida coast last week. That
makes landfall predictions difficult - and makes it
harder for some to take the storm seriously.
"We're just having a grand time," said Diane
Komorowski, a tourist from Philadelphia, as she walked
through the choppy surf on the Outer Banks with her
husband.
"They keep saying, 'It's coming,' - yet every
day, it's great here," she said.
Some doubted that Ophelia could pack the same punch
as Katrina.
"If it was that bad, we would leave," said
Charlene Heroux, 46, a 30-year resident of Manteo.
At 5 a.m. EDT, Ophelia was centered about 70 miles
south of Wilmington and about 125 miles east-northeast
of Charleston, S.C., and was moving north at 5 mph.
The storm's effects were already being felt as heavy
rains fell on the coast near the border of the Carolinas.
A hurricane warning extended about 275 miles from the
South Santee River in South Carolina to Oregon Inlet
at Pamlico Sound in North Carolina, meaning hurricane
conditions were expected within 24 hours.
The storm was moving slowly, so heavy
rain could linger over land and cause serious flooding.
The hurricane center said up to 15 inches of rain was
possible in eastern North Carolina.
Early Wednesday, a bridge in Hanover County was closed
because of wind with gusts in the mid-40s. County spokesman
David Paynter said the latest forecasts suggested that
hurricane-force winds will only scrape the county's
coast because the center of the storm would pass 30
to 40 miles offshore.
State and local officials, determined not to be caught
off-guard after Katrina, blanketed the coast with a
mix of voluntary and mandatory evacuations, closing
schools and opening shelters. Nearly 100 people had
checked into a shelter in an elementary school near
downtown Wilmington on Tuesday night.
Bruce McIlvaine of Logan Township, N.J., was among
those who cleared out Tuesday, packing to leave Hatteras
Island before his vacation ended.
"I don't really want to mess with it," he
said. "You're on a spit of land a dozen miles into
the ocean."
Along the exposed Outer Banks, all residents and visitors
were ordered to evacuate Hatteras Island on Tuesday,
visitors had been ordered off Ocracoke Island and the
National Park Service closed the Cape Hatteras lighthouse
and the Wright Brothers National Memorial in Kill Devil
Hills.
Schools were closed in several coastal counties in
the Carolinas, while classes were canceled at the University
of North Carolina at Wilmington and East Carolina University
in Greenville, S.C.
A surfer was missing along the South Carolina coast,
with the search suspended because of rough seas.
North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley said coastal residents
should be prepared to go without power for two to three
days.
"The beaches we expect to take a real beating,"
Easley said. "The bottom line is we're definitely
going to get flooding, not just on the coast but in
low-lying areas as the rivers swell from the storm surge
itself."
Still, many people were taking a wait-and-see approach.
"We're levelheaded - we got common sense,"
said Nancy McKenzie, 57. She was shopping at a Nags
Head candy shop that sold plastic bags filled with saltwater
taffy and fudge for $4, with the label "Hurricane
Ophelia official survival kit."
Ophelia is the 15th named storm and seventh hurricane
in this year's busy Atlantic hurricane season, which
began June 1 and ends Nov. 30. |
KUALA LUMPUR, Sept
14 (Bernama) -- A moderate earthquake measuring 5.0 on
the richter scale occurred at 4.17 pm Wednesday in Nicobar
Island, 956km northeast of Penang, the Meteorological
Services Department said.
It said the earthquake occurred at 7.8 degrees North
and 92.0 degrees East of Nicobar Island.
Based on its location and magnitude, tremors may not
be felt in the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia and no
tsunami is expected, it added. |
A moderate earthquake occurred
at 14:32:57 (UTC) on Tuesday, September 13, 2005. The
magnitude 5.5 event has been located in the NICOBAR
ISLANDS, INDIA REGION. (This event has been reviewed
by a seismologist.) |
A moderate earthquake occurred
at 21:15:05 (UTC) on Monday, September 12, 2005. The
magnitude 5.7 event has been located in the FIJI REGION.
(This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.) |
PARIS - A fire in a Paris squat
overnight resulted in minor damage and no injuries to
the occupants, police said Wednesday, but it did draw
attention to a spate of previous blazes in the capital
that have taken a heavy toll on African immigrants.
The fire, whose origin was not yet determined, broke
out on the ground floor of an abandoned building in
the city's southeast 12th district. A couple and their
child who were illegally residing at the address were
not hurt.
Other more disastrous fires have hit the Paris area
recently.
Last month, separate blazes in two dilapidated buildings
killed 24 African immigrants, most of them children,
while another -- allegedly started by a gang of teenaged
girls -- killed 18 people, half of them of African origin,
in a suburban highrise. |
UK -- REPORTS of bright, orange
orbs over Louth have left experts baffled.
The balls of multi-coloured light were seen by residents
in St Bernard's Avenue around 10pm last Sunday.
Two weeks ago three similar sightings off the coast
of Trusthorpe were explained as being made by afterburners
from military aircraft on exercise.
But RAF bosses said this time there had been no fighter
jets around the Louth area at that time last Sunday.
Steve Whittleton, 34, from St Bernard's Avenue, said:
"I saw two UFOs - I'm certain of that.
"There were two massive orange balls right above
me, moving slowly.
"I wanted to rub my eyes but I did not want to
miss them. I told my wife, but she thought I was bonkers
but I know what I saw."
A spokesman at The Coastguard HQ in Great Yarmouth
said the strange lights seen over Trusthorpe, last week,
were nothing to be concerned about – and were
likely to have been made by military aircraft.
But an RAF spokesman said Sunday's
orange balls were a mystery. They said: "We don't
think there were any jets in the sky at the time. It's
very unusual."
The spokesman said Air Traffic Control had been closed
on Friday night, which meant private aircraft flights
were likely to have gone unrecorded. |
For
the first time, the Signs Team's most popular and discerning
essays have been compiled into book form and thematically
organized.
These books contain hard hitting exposés into
human nature, propaganda, psyop activities and insights
into the world events that shape our future and our
understanding of the world.
The six new books, available now at our bookstore,
are entitled:
- 911 Conspiracy
- The Human Condition
- The Media
- Religion
- The Work
- U.S. Freedom
Read
them today - before the book burning starts! |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|