|
"You get America out of Iraq and
Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism."
- Cindy Sheehan
|
P I C T U R E
O F T H E D A Y
Éclair
et clair de Lune, La Romieu, Gers, 17 août 2005 à
00:34
Copyright 2005 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
On the fourth
anniversary of the September 11th attacks, Laura Knight-Jadczyk
announces the availability of her latest book:
In the years since the 9/11 attacks, dozens of books
have sought to explore the truth behind the official
version of events that day - yet to date, none of
these publications has provided a satisfactory answer
as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately
responsible for carrying them out.
Taking a broad, millennia-long perspective, Laura
Knight-Jadczyk's 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth uncovers the true nature of
the ruling elite on our planet and presents new and
ground-breaking insights into just how the 9/11 attacks
played out.
9/11: The Ultimate
Truth makes a strong case for the idea that September
11, 2001 marked the moment when our planet entered
the final phase of a diabolical plan that has been
many, many years in the making. It is a plan developed
and nurtured by successive generations of ruthless
individuals who relentlessly exploit the negative
aspects of basic human nature to entrap humanity as
a whole in endless wars and suffering in order to
keep us confused and distracted to the reality of
the man behind the curtain.
Drawing on historical and genealogical sources, Knight-Jadczyk
eloquently links the 9/11 event to the modern-day
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. She also cites the clear
evidence that our planet undergoes periodic natural
cataclysms, a cycle that has arguably brought humanity
to the brink of destruction in the present day.
For its no nonsense style in cutting to the core
of the issue and its sheer audacity in refusing to
be swayed or distracted by the morass of disinformation
that has been employed by the Powers that Be to cover
their tracks, 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth can rightly claim to be THE
definitive book on 9/11 - and what that fateful day's
true implications are for the future of mankind.
Published by Red Pill Press
Scheduled for release on October 1,
2005, readers can pre-order the book today at our bookstore. |
Now
They Tell Us |
By Dan Froomkin
Special to washingtonpost.com
Monday, September 12, 2005; 1:33 PM |
Amid a slew of stories
this weekend about the embattled presidency and the blundering
government response to the drowning of New Orleans, some
journalists who are long-time observers of the White House
are suddenly sharing scathing observations about President
Bush that may be new to many of their readers.
Is Bush the commanding, decisive, jovial president you've
been hearing about for years in so much of the mainstream
press?
Maybe not so much.
Judging from the blistering analyses
in Time, Newsweek, and elsewhere these past few days,
it turns out that Bush is in fact fidgety, cold and snappish
in private. He yells at those who dare give him bad news
and is therefore not surprisingly surrounded by an echo
chamber of terrified sycophants. He is slow to comprehend
concepts that don't emerge from his gut. He is uncomprehending
of the speeches that he is given to read. And oh yes,
one of his most significant legacies -- the immense post-Sept.
11 reorganization of the federal government which created
the Homeland Security Department -- has failed a big test.
Maybe it's Bush's sinking poll numbers -- he is, after
all, undeniably an unpopular president now. Maybe it's
the way that the federal response to the flood has cut
so deeply against Bush's most compelling claim to greatness:
His resoluteness when it comes to protecting Americans.
But for whatever reason, critical observations and insights
that for so long have been zealously guarded by mainstream
journalists, and only doled out in teaspoons if at all,
now seem to be flooding into the public sphere.
An emperor-has-no-clothes moment seems upon us.
Read All About It
The two seminal reads are from Newsweek and Time.
Evan
Thomas's story in Newsweek is headlined: "How
Bush Blew It."
"It's a standing joke among the president's top
aides: who gets to deliver the bad news? Warm and hearty
in public, Bush can be cold and snappish in private, and
aides sometimes cringe before the displeasure of the president
of the United States," Thomas writes.
In this sort of environment, Bush apparently didn't fathom
the extent of the catastrophe in the Gulf Coast for more
than three days after the levees of New Orleans were breached.
"The reality, say several aides who did not wish
to be quoted because it might displease the president,
did not really sink in until Thursday night. Some White
House staffers were watching the evening news and thought
the president needed to see the horrific reports coming
out of New Orleans. Counselor Bartlett made up a DVD of
the newscasts so Bush could see them in their entirety
as he flew down to the Gulf Coast the next morning on
Air Force One.
"How this could be -- how the president
of the United States could have even less 'situational
awareness,' as they say in the military, than the average
American about the worst natural disaster in a century
-- is one of the more perplexing and troubling chapters
in a story that, despite moments of heroism and acts of
great generosity, ranks as a national disgrace."
Among Thomas's disclosures: "Bush
can be petulant about dissent; he equates disagreement
with disloyalty. After five years in office, he is surrounded
largely by people who agree with him. . . .
"Late last week, Bush was, by some
accounts, down and angry. But another Bush aide described
the atmosphere inside the White House as 'strangely surreal
and almost detached.' At one meeting described by this
insider, officials were oddly self-congratulatory, perhaps
in an effort to buck each other up. Life inside a bunker
can be strange, especially in defeat."
Mike
Allen writes in Time: "Longtime Bush watchers
say they are not shocked that he missed his moment --
one of his most trusted confidants calls him 'a better
third- and fourth-quarter player,' who focuses and delivers
when he sees the stakes. What surprised them was that
he still appeared to be stutter-stepping in the second
week of the crisis, struggling to make up for past lapses
instead of taking control with a grand gesture. Just as
Katrina exposed the lurking problems of race and poverty,
it also revealed the limitations of Bush's rigid, top-down
approach to the presidency. . . .
"Bush's bubble has grown more hermetic
in the second term, they say, with fewer people willing
or able to bring him bad news -- or tell him when he's
wrong. Bush has never been adroit about this. A youngish
aide who is a Bush favorite described the perils of correcting
the boss. 'The first time I told him he was wrong, he
started yelling at me,' the aide recalled about a session
during the first term. 'Then I showed him where he was
wrong, and he said, "All right. I understand. Good
job." He patted me on the shoulder. I went and had
dry heaves in the bathroom.' . . .
"The result is a kind of echo chamber
in which good news can prevail over bad -- even when there
is a surfeit of evidence to the contrary. For example,
a source tells Time that four days after Katrina struck,
Bush himself briefed his father and former President Clinton
in a way that left too rosy an impression of the progress
made. 'It bore no resemblance to what was actually happening,'
said someone familiar with the presentation."
Allen has an exclusive look at the administration's "three-part
comeback plan."
Part one: "Spend freely, and worry about the tab
and the consequences later."
Part two: "Don't look back."
Part three: "Develop a new set of goals to announce
after Katrina fades. Advisers are proceeding with plans
to gin up base-conservative voters for next year's congressional
midterm elections with a platform that probably will be
focused around tax reform."
Allen also has this tidbit: "And as if the West
Wing were suddenly snakebit, his franchise player, senior
adviser and deputy chief of staff, Karl Rove, was on the
disabled list for part of last week, working from home
after being briefly hospitalized with painful kidney stones."
And remember the storyline of the CEO president who cut
red tape and streamlined government?
John
Dickerson writes in Slate how the much-celebrated
creation of the Homeland Security Department, the embodiment
of Bush's management style, is suddenly an epic tale of
failure.
"They built an enormous agency
from scratch, vowing to create the kind of shiny, swiftly
clicking apparatus they envisioned for the government
as a whole. Judging by the DHS response to Katrina, we
can breathe a sigh of relief that they didn't expand their
bureaucracy vendetta further."
Dickerson describes an interview in which White House
Chief of Staff Andrew Card, who masterminded the reorganization,
"described the process of creation with delight:
He leaned off the sofa and grinned as he spoke, giddy
at having been able to pedal so quickly past the usual
government roadblocks. The defenders of the bureaucracy
were so virulent, he had to put together a small team
and they took their blueprints and drafting tools into
the secure bunker underneath the White House."
Dickerson concludes: "We now know the solution has
failed. In the coming months we'll have a chance to learn
just how, and in how many different ways, that bureaucracy-free,
executive-authority-channeling machine sprang its wires,
and whether the architects share the blame with the operators."
Poll Watch
Howard
Fineman writes for Newsweek: "Katrina's winds
have unspun the spin of the Bush machine, particularly
the crucial idea that he is a commanding commander in
chief. In the Newsweek Poll, only 17 percent of Americans
say that he deserves the most blame for the botched early
response to Katrina. But, for the first time, less than
a majority -- 49 percent -- say he has 'strong leadership
qualities,' down from 63 percent last year. That weakness,
in turn, dragged down his job-approval rating -- now at
38 percent, his lowest ever -- as well as voters' sense
of where the country is headed. By a 66-28 margin, they
say they are 'dissatisfied,' by far the gloomiest view
in the Bush years, and among the worst in recent decades."
Marcus
Mabry has more from the Newsweek poll. "[M]ost
Americans, 52 percent, say they do not trust the president
'to make the right decisions during a domestic crisis'
(45 percent do). The numbers are exactly the same when
the subject is trust of the president to make the right
decisions during an international crisis. . . .
"The president and the GOP's greatest hope may be,
ironically, how deeply divided the nation remains, even
after national tragedy. The president's Republican base,
in particular, remains extremely loyal. For instance,
53 percent of Democrats say the federal government did
a poor job in getting help to people in New Orleans after
Katrina. But just 19 percent of Republicans feel that
way. In fact, almost half of Republicans (48 percent)
either believes the federal government did a good job
(37 percent) or an excellent job (11 percent) helping
those stuck in New Orleans."
A new Time
poll finds Bush at an all time low 42 percent approval
rating, with 52 percent disapproving.
Time's poll is the second one recently to chart a significant
drop in presidential approval among Republicans. (See
Friday's
column about Bush losing his base.)
Accord to Time, since January, Republican approval has
dropped from 91 percent to 81 percent; Democratic approval
from 25 to 13; and indpendent approval from 46 to 36.
And 61 percent of those polled favor paying for hurricane
relief by cutting back spending in Iraq.
The Breakdown
Anna
Mulrine writes in U.S. News: "Who screwed up?
"The president's spinners dubbed it the blame game,
but given the loss of life, the staggering incompetence
at nearly every level of government, and the increasingly
dire economic implications for the nation, much more than
the usual political one-upmanship is in the offing."
Susan
B. Glasser and Michael Grunwald write in The Washington
Post: "As the floodwaters recede and the dead are
counted, what went wrong during a terrible week that would
render a modern American metropolis of nearly half a million
people uninhabitable and set off the largest exodus of
people since the Civil War, is starting to become clear.
Federal, state and local officials failed to heed forecasts
of disaster from hurricane experts. Evacuation plans,
never practical, were scrapped entirely for New Orleans's
poorest and least able. And once floodwaters rose, as
had been long predicted, the rescue teams, medical personnel
and emergency power necessary to fight back were nowhere
to be found."
Eric
Lipton, Christopher Drew, Scott Shane and David Rohde
all write in the New York Times that " an initial
examination of Hurricane Katrina's aftermath demonstrates
the extent to which the federal government failed to fulfill
the pledge it made after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to
face domestic threats as a unified, seamless force.
"Instead, the crisis in New Orleans deepened because
of a virtual standoff between hesitant federal officials
and besieged authorities in Louisiana, interviews with
dozens of officials show. . . .
"Richard A. Falkenrath, a former homeland security
adviser in the Bush White House, said the chief federal
failure was not anticipating that the city and state would
be so compromised. He said the response exposed 'false
advertising' about how the government has been transformed
four years after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks."
The Los
Angeles Times reports: "Ultimately, the National
Response Plan says the president is in charge during a
national emergency, but it leaves it up to the White House
to decide how to fulfill that duty. 'The president leads
the nation in responding effectively and ensuring the
necessary resources are applied quickly and efficiently,'
the plan says."
And here's a telling anecdote from the LA Times: "On
Friday, Sept. 2, four days after the storm, Bush headed
for the disaster area on a presidential trip designed
to show leadership and concern.
"At a meeting that morning, one aide said, the president
expressed anger about the convention center. Say that
in public, one aide reportedly urged. So Bush went out
to the Rose Garden and grimly acknowledged for the first
time that all was not well. 'The results are not acceptable,'
he said.
"But the president appeared uncomfortable even with
that much self-criticism. A few hours later, in Biloxi,
he softened the message. . . .
" 'I am satisfied with the [federal] response,'
Bush said. 'I'm not satisfied with all the results. .
. . I'm certainly not denigrating the efforts of anybody.
But the results can be better.'
"And Bush, who instinctively defends any aide who
has been criticized in the media, made a point of praising
FEMA chief Brown.
" 'Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job,' he said."
Time
magazine concludes: "Leaders were afraid to actually
lead, reluctant to cost businesses money, break jurisdictional
rules or spawn lawsuits. They were afraid, in other words,
of ending up in an article just like this one."
Advancing Republican Goals
Edmund
L. Andrews writes in the New York Times: "Republican
leaders in Congress and some White House officials see
opportunities in Hurricane Katrina to advance longstanding
conservative goals like giving students vouchers to pay
for private schools, paying churches to help with temporary
housing and scaling back business regulation."
Jonathan
Weisman and Amy Goldstein write in The Washington
Post: "After the political
tidal wave of 1994 swept conservatives into control of
Congress, Republicans doggedly tried -- and repeatedly
failed -- to repeal a Depression-era law that requires
federal contractors to pay workers the prevailing wages
in their communities. Eleven days after the deluge of
Hurricane Katrina, President Bush banished the requirement,
at least temporarily, with the stroke of his pen. . .
.
"In another gain for the administration, a $51.8
billion relief bill that Congress passed on Thursday included
a significant change to federal contracting regulations.
Holders of government-issued credit cards will be allowed
to spend up to $250,000 on Katrina-related contracts and
purchases, without requiring them to seek competitive
bids or to patronize small businesses or companies owned
by minorities and women. Before Thursday, only purchases
of up to $2,500 in normal circumstances or $15,000 in
emergencies were exempt."
The Spoils of Disaster
Yochi
J. Dreazen writes in the Wall Street Journal (subscription
required): "The Bush administration is importing
many of the contracting practices blamed for spending
abuses in Iraq as it begins the largest and costliest
rebuilding effort in U.S. history.
"The first large-scale contracts related to Hurricane
Katrina, as in Iraq, were awarded without competitive
bidding, and using so-called cost-plus provisions that
guarantee contractors a certain profit regardless of how
much they spend."
Reuters
reports: "Companies with ties
to the Bush White House and the former head of FEMA are
clinching some of the administration's first disaster
relief and reconstruction contracts in the aftermath of
Hurricane Katrina.
"At least two major corporate
clients of lobbyist Joe Allbaugh, President George W.
Bush's former campaign manager and a former head of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency, have already been
tapped to start recovery work along the battered Gulf
Coast."
Bush's Trip
Bush is wrapping up a two-day "fact finding"
trip to the Gulf Coast today. I'll have more about it
tomorrow.
The big question: Will Bush risk an encounter with any
angry storm victims?
As Elisabeth
Bumiller writes in the New York Times: "One prominent
African-American supporter of Mr. Bush who is close to
Karl Rove, the White House political chief, said the president
did not go into the heart of New Orleans and meet with
black victims on his first trip there, last Friday, because
he knew that White House officials were 'scared to death'
of the reaction.
" 'If I'm Karl, do I want the visual of black people
hollering at the president as if we're living in Rwanda?'
said the supporter, who spoke only anonymously because
he did not want to antagonize Mr. Rove."
One quick note from pool reporter Mark Silva of the Chicago
Tribune: While Bush spent last night aboard the USS Iwo
Jima, "poolers were assigned to bunks aboard luxury
Prevost touring buses. Men in one, women in another. The
men's bus is fresh off The Anger Management Tour, which
had featured Fifty Cent and Eminem."
Brownie Watch
David
E. Sanger writes in the New York Times about just
how it happened that White House spokesman Scott McClellan
was still praising the work of Michael D. Brown, the head
of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, hours after
Brown's removal from day-to-day management of the hurricane
was pretty much a done deal.
Sanger writes that "how the White House moved, in
a matter of days, from the president's praise of a man
he nicknamed 'Brownie' to a rare public reassignment explains
much about fears within the administration that its delayed
response to the disaster could do lasting damage to both
Mr. Bush's power and his legacy. But more important to
some members of the administration, it dented the administration's
aura of competence. . . .
"Mr. Bush, his aides acknowledge, is loath to fire
members of his administration or to take public actions
that are tantamount to an admission of a major mistake.
But the hurricane was different, they say: the delayed
response was playing out every day on television, and
Mr. Brown, fairly or unfairly, seemed unaware of crucial
events, particularly the scenes of chaos and death in
the New Orleans convention center."
Race and Poverty
Michael
A. Fletcher writes in The Washington Post: "Hurricane
Katrina has thrust the twin issues of race and poverty
at President Bush, who faces steep challenges in dealing
with both because of a domestic agenda that envisions
deep cuts in long-standing anti-poverty programs and relationships
with many black leaders frayed by years of mutual suspicion."
Bumiller
writes in the New York Times: "From the political
perspective of the White House, Hurricane Katrina destroyed
more than an enormous swath of the Gulf Coast. The storm
also appears to have damaged the carefully laid plans
of Karl Rove, President Bush's political adviser, to make
inroads among black voters and expand the reach of the
Republican Party for decades to come. . . .
"But behind the scenes in the West Wing, there has
been anxiety and scrambling -- after an initial misunderstanding,
some of the president's advocates say, of the racial dimension
to the crisis."
What the President Meant to Say
At another contentious briefing
on Friday, McClellan addressed Bush's infamous declaration
on a live television interview Thursday that "I don't
think anybody anticipated the breach of the levees."
"What the President was referring to is that you
had Hurricane Katrina hit, and then it passed New Orleans.
And if you'll remember, all the media reports, or a number
of media reports at that time, that Monday -- even all
the way to the Tuesday papers, were talking to people
and saying that New Orleans had dodged a bullet. So I
think that's what the President is referring to, is that
people weren't anticipating those levees, after the hurricane
had passed New Orleans, breaching. Many people weren't.
And you can go back and look at the news coverage at that
time."
Internet Humor
Robin
Abcarian writes in the Los Angeles Times: "In
the picture
, residents of New Orleans make their way through waist-deep
water as President Bush stands next to his father, grinning
and displaying a striped bass that he's just caught. 'Bush's
vacation' is the caption of the photographic gag that
has made its way around the Internet this week.
"In another
doctored photo , the president strums a guitar and
appears to be serenading a weeping African American woman
holding a baby in front of the Louisiana Superdome.
"Perverse though it might seem, the juxtaposition
of Hurricane Katrina's human costs with the perceived
sluggishness of the federal government's response has
proved to be a boon for political humorists -- particularly
those operating in cyberspace, where dissemination is
instantaneous." |
The Nation -- Finally,
we have discovered the roots of George W. Bush's "compassionate
conservatism."
On the heels of the president's "What, me worry?"
response to the death, destruction and dislocation that
followed upon Hurricane Katrina comes the news of his
mother's Labor Day visit with hurricane evacuees at the
Astrodome in Houston.
Commenting on the facilities that have been set up for
the evacuees -- cots crammed side-by-side in a huge stadium
where the lights never go out and the sound of sobbing
children never completely ceases -- former First Lady
Barbara Bush concluded that the poor people of New Orleans
had lucked out.
"Everyone is so overwhelmed by the hospitality.
And so many of the people in the
arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway, so
this, this is working very well for them,"
Mrs. Bush told American Public Media's "Marketplace"
program, before returning to her multi-million dollar
Houston home.
On the tape of the interview, Mrs. Bush
chuckles audibly as she observes just how great things
are going for families that are separated from loved ones,
people who have been forced to abandon their homes and
the only community where they have ever lived, and parents
who are explaining to children that their pets, their
toys and in some cases their friends may be lost forever.
Perhaps the former first lady was amusing herself with
the notion that evacuees without bread could eat cake.
At the very least, she was expressing a measure of empathy
commensurate with that evidenced by her son during his
fly-ins for disaster-zone photo opportunities.
On Friday, when even Republican lawmakers were giving
the federal government an "F" for its response
to the crisis, President Bush heaped praise on embattled
Federal Emergency Management Agency chief Michael Brown.
As thousands of victims of the hurricane continued to
plead for food, water, shelter, medical care and a way
out of the nightmare to which federal neglect had consigned
them, Brown cheerily announced that "people are getting
the help they need."
Barbara Bush's son put his arm around the addled FEMA
functionary and declared, "Brownie, you're doing
a heck of a job."
Like mother, like son.
Even when a hurricane hits, the apple does not fall far
from the tree. |
The last couple of
weeks we’ve been learning some truly awful, unbearable
lessons. But one of the lessons has been perversely prosaic:
PR only goes so far. Not only have we been parsing anew
the limits of public relations, but the limits of people
who have become perilously, mindlessly dependent on PR
in place of action. Their leadership limits, their moral
limits.
When George Bush made his first, belated stop in New
Orleans, touching down at the city’s airport, he
actually viewed his visit as an appropriate occasion for
a little light comedy. Here’s the official White
House transcript: “I believe that the great city
of New Orleans will rise again and be a greater city of
New Orleans. (Applause.) I believe the town where I used
to come, from Houston, Texas, to enjoy myself -- occasionally
too much (Laughter.) -- will be that very same town, that
it will be a better place to come to. That’s what
I believe. I believe the great state of Louisiana will
get its feet back and become a vital contributor to the
country.”
It was, of course, just the latest highlight in his career
as chief marketing officer for the Rove/Cheney/Rumsfeld
neo-con agenda. It’s a job that entails always sticking
to a breezy, upbeat storyline.
It’s no surprise that Bush took this PR-trumps-action
tack for Katrina. For much of his five years in office,
he’s seen that putting a faux-cheerful, faux-hopeful
spin on even the worst calamities (see also: the war in
Iraq) meant that a cheerful, hopeful spin would automatically
float to the top of the memepool, at least momentarily.
If he kept repeating these faux-cheerful, faux-hopeful
things ad nauseum, he’d have a great shot of at
least partially obscuring all the actual rotting nastiness
lurking below the surface.
Of course, the problem post-Katrina
is that, unlike Iraq -- where journalists are no longer
in the thick of things (with most abandoning the idea
of embedded reporting) -- New Orleans had real journalists
showing us the reality behind the rhetoric. And
enough of them were sufficiently appalled at the government
inaction that they basically ended up begging the feds,
on the air, to come to the rescue. (Of course, that didn’t
stop FEMA from issuing an absurd directive last week that
journalists avoid showing dead bodies during the recovery
process. Anybody who’d seen Oprah Winfrey’s
Sept. 6 show, which offered devastating close-ups of victims’
bodies being left to rot, will feel outrage at the agency’s
hapless, belated attempt at covering up just how murderous
its glacial response was.)
On the very day the levees were about to give way in
New Orleans, the buzz in medialand was about a Miami Herald
article linked on Jim Romenesko’s media site. Romenesko
summed it up thusly: “Is journalism in danger of
losing its young idealists to PR? Edward Wasserman says
young people want to do something ‘active’
-- to make things happen instead of reacting to events
the way they do in newsrooms. ‘Students come back
from summer PR internships with exciting tales of scanning
the next day’s papers for stories they helped bring
about,’ he wrote."
That’s where our heads have
been in this country, and that’s where the president’s
head is: PR is considered action, while actual action
is an afterthought. Which is why Bush was able
to publicly say to FEMA Director Michael Brown, with a
straight face, “Brownie, you’re doing a heck
of a job.” Whereas Bush & Co. have mostly been
able to explain away troop shortages and strategic errors
in Iraq (by simply denying shortages and errors), the
troop shortages in New Orleans -- and the calamitous lack
of federal strategy and response -- could not be dismissed
by the president’s cheerful quips.
Still, all he knew to do was keep up the PR talk, as
if leadership were made up solely of spin as opposed to,
say, actually leading. And so he continued with the PR-ification
of life post-Katrina, uttering this gem from Mobile, Ala.:
“Out of the rubbles (sic)
of Trent Lott’s house -- he’s lost his entire
house -- there’s going to be a fantastic house.
And I’m looking forward to sitting on the porch.”
Sure, as Nicholas D. Kristof noted in The New York Times,
the deeper scandals are New Orleans’ grinding poverty,
and the fact that nationally “the number of poor
people has now risen 17% under Mr. Bush,” after
having declined sharply under Clinton Administration.
But from the Bush P.O.V., there’s a simple solution
for that hateful reality: Sell ‘em something else.
Here’s the pitch: close your eyes and imagine Lott,
in an SUV, driving to the nearest Home Depot to pick up
some TimberTech all-weather composite decking. It’ll
be grey. With white railings. That’d be nice, wouldn’t
it? Wouldn’t you, too, like to sit on a porch like
that? |
NEW ORLEANS, United States - President
George W. Bush went into storm-wrecked New Orleans for
the first time, as the heavily-criticised head of the
federal agency overseeing disaster relief quit.
Two weeks after Hurricane Katrina turned the city into
a festering swamp, the gruesome job of recovering bodies
gathered pace and the confirmed death toll rose above
500.
Seeking to counter criticism of his
handling of the disaster, Bush toured parts of the flooded
city in the back of a military truck and from the air
in a helicopter.
Bush had previously flown over New Orleans but not
seen the devastation from the ground. He later went
to a suburb that was badly hit by the August 29 storm
and to visit Gulfport in Mississippi.
The mounting criticism has seen Bush's approval ratings
slump to their worst levels since he took office in
January 2001.
And yielding to intense pressure over criticism of
the Federal Emergency Management Agency's slow response
to Katrina, agency chief Michael
Brown quit, US media reported.
Bush appeared not to know about the resignation. "I
can't comment on something that you may know more about
than I do," he told reporters while visiting the
disaster zone.
But critics were delighted.
"Michael Brown's departure from
FEMA is long overdue, and his resignation is the right
thing for the country and for the people of the Gulf
Coast states," said Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic
leader in the Senate.
Brown had been called back to Washington on Friday
and replaced as the pointman on the ground by Coast
Guard Vice Admiral Thad Allen. Bush had stood up for
under-fire Brown in the immediate aftermath of the disaster
telling him: "Brownie, you're doing a heck of a
job."
But it was Brown's replacement who on Monday briefed
Bush and local and military officials about efforts
to find temporary housing for survivors.
Bush has refused to identify any specific failures
in Washington's response to Katrina but flatly dismissed
critics who have noted that most of those unable to
flee the city were black.
"The storm didn't discriminate, and neither will
the recovery effort," he said, also rejecting reported
comments by National Guard Lieutenant General Steven
Blum that a day of response time was "arguably"
lost due to deployments in Iraq.
"It is preposterous to claim that the engagement
in Iraq meant there wasn't enough troops here. It's
pure and simple," he added. "We've got plenty
of troops to do both."
On the ground, more pumps came online and other signs
emerged of attempts to bring life back to New Orleans.
Passes to cross a security cordon around the city were
to be issued to help small businesses hoping to reopen.
Owners of small shops, restaurants, hotels, gasoline
stations and supermarkets were to be allowed to visit
their properties to assess damage, said Louisiana state
police spokesman Johnnie Brown.
The city Louis Armstrong International Airport, which
has handled only humanitarian and military flights since
Katrina struck, was gearing up to reopen to commercial
flights on Tuesday.
Despite the progress, the city's infrastructure
is wrecked, and reconstruction will take many years
and cost billions of dollars.
Many districts, especially in east New Orleans, remain
under deep brown floodwaters up to two metres (six-feet)
deep and covered with a floating sludge of trash and
debris.
Teams fished out bloated corpses from the stinking,
trash-strewn mess, and urged residents who have not
done so to leave for safe shelter, although they were
not using force to apply an order to quit town.
In dry streets, skeletal dogs roamed for food, sometimes
gnawing at the carcasses of dead pets. An
animal rescue official said she had seen dogs eating
human cadavers on one highway exit ramp.
The confirmed death toll was certain to rise, although
officials have said they are confident that it will
be less than the 10,000 dead estimated last week for
New Orleans alone.
But the number of evacuees forced to seek refuge in
homeless shelters was down significantly, the Department
of
Homeland Security said, with the number of people displaced
by Katrina now 141,000, down from 208,000.
To help the effort, Louisiana, Mississippi
and Alabama were crafting a multi-billion-dollar economic
recovery bill aimed at luring business back to the disaster
zone, including tax incentives and a huge bond issue,
a Louisiana official said.
A fresh storm -- this time poised off the US east coast
-- continued to worry weather-watchers.
With winds receding on Monday morning, Ophelia was
downgraded from a hurricane to a tropical storm. But
the center said the storm could pick up force on Tuesday
and become a category one hurricane again. |
Michael Brown, the embattled head
of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, approved
payments in excess of $31 million in taxpayer money
to thousands of Florida residents who were unaffected
by Hurricane Frances and three other hurricanes last
year in an effort to help President Bush win a majority
of votes in that state during his reelection campaign,
according to published reports.
"Some Homeland Security sources said FEMA's efforts
to distribute funds quickly after Frances and three
other hurricanes that hit the key political battleground
state of Florida in a six-week period last fall were
undertaken with a keen awareness of the looming presidential
elections," according to a May 19 Washington Post
story.
Homeland Security sources told the
Post that after the hurricanes that Brown "and
his allies [recommended] him to succeed Tom Ridge as
Homeland Security secretary because of their claim that
he helped deliver Florida to President Bush by efficiently
responding to the Florida hurricanes."
The South Florida Sun-Sentinel uncovered emails from
Florida Gov. Jeb Bush that confirmed those allegations
and directly implicated Brown as playing politics at
the expense of hurricane victims.
"As the second hurricane in less than a month
bore down on Florida last fall, a federal [FEMA] consultant
predicted a "huge mess" that could reflect
poorly on President Bush and suggested that his re-election
staff be brought in to minimize any political liability,
records show," the Sentinel reported in a March
23 story.
"Two weeks later, a Florida official summarizing
the hurricane response wrote that the Federal Emergency
Management Agency was handing out housing assistance
"to everyone who needs it without asking for much
information of any kind."
The records the Sentinel obtained were contained in
hundreds of pages of Gov. Jeb Bush's storm-related e-mails
the paper received from the governor's office under
the threat of a lawsuit.
The explosive charges of mismanagement of disaster
relief funds made against Brown and FEMA were confirmed
earlier this year following a four-month investigation
by Richard Skinner, the Department of Homeland Security's
inspector general. Skinner looked into media reports
alleging that residents of Miami-Dade were receiving
windfall payments from FEMA to cover losses from Hurricane
Frances they never incurred.
Hurricane Frances hit Hutchinson Island, Fla., about
100 miles north of Dade County, on Sept. 5. Miami-Dade
officials described damage there from heavy rain and
winds of up to 45 mph as ''minimal,'' according to the
Post.
Indeed. A May 14 story in thSun-Sentinel
said: "Miami-Dade County residents collected Hurricane
Frances aid for belongings they didn't own, temporary
housing they never requested and cars worth far less
than the government paid, according to a federal audit
that questions millions in storm payouts."
Responding to those allegations, Brown held a news
conference Jan. 11 blaming the overpayments on a "computer
glitch" and said the disbursements were far less
than the $31 million that was cited in news reports
and involved 3,500 people. Moreover, to silence his
critics who said that Hurricane Frances barely touched
down in Miami-Dade, Brown cited a report by the National
Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to prove that
there were legitimate hurricane conditions there and
as a result that a bulk of the payments was legitimate.
But according to the Sun-Sentinel, NOAA had refuted
the weather maps Brown claimed to have obtained from
them. That report prompted Congressman Robert Wexler
to send off a scathing letter to President Bush calling
for Brown's resignation.
Bush rebuffed Wexler. However, the DHS' inspector general
launched a probe to determine how widespread the problems
were involving overpayments to Miami-Dade residents.
In May, the inspector general released his report. What
he found was damning.
"The review found waste and poor controls in every
level of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's assistance
program and challenges the designation of Miami-Dade
as a disaster area when the county "did not incur
any hurricane force winds, tornados or other adverse
weather conditions that would cause widespread damage."
In identifying one of the overpayments, the inspector
general's report said FEMA paid $10 million to replace
hundreds of household items even though only a bed was
reported to be damaged, the inspector general's report
said.
"Millions of individuals and households became
eligible to apply for [money], straining FEMA's limited
inspection resources to verify damages and making the
program more susceptible to potential fraud, waste and
abuse," the report states.
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, chairwoman of the Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs committee, said during
a committee hearing in May that Brown "approved
massive payouts to replace thousands of televisions,
air conditioners, beds and other furniture, as well
as a number of cars, without receipts, or proof of ownership
or damage, and based solely on verbal statements by
the residents, sometimes made in fleeting encounters
at fast-food restaurants."
"It was a pay first, ask questions later approach,''
Collins said. ''The inspector general's report identifies
a number of significant control weaknesses that create
a potential for widespread fraud, erroneous payments
and wasteful practices.''
But the most interesting charge against
Brown is that he helped speed up payments in Florida
and purposely bypassed FEMA's lengthy reviews process
for distributing funds in order to help Bush secure
votes in the state during last year's presidential election.
Bob Hunter, director of insurance for the Consumer
Federation of America, who was a top federal flood insurance
official in the 1970s and 1980s and a Texas insurance
commissioner in the 1990s, told the Post "that
in the vast majority of hurricanes, other than those
in Florida in 2004, complaints are rife that FEMA has
vastly underpaid hurricane victims. The Frances overpayments
are questionable given the timing of the election and
Florida's importance as a battleground state."
FEMA consultant Glenn Garcelon actions certainly lends
credibility to questions raised by Hunter.
On Sept. 2, 2004, Garcelon, wrote a three-page memo
titled "Hurricane Frances -- Thoughts and Suggestions."
"The Republican National Convention
was winding down, and President Bush had only a slight
lead in the polls against Democrat John Kerry,"
the Sentinel reported in its March 23 story. "Winning
Florida was key to the president's re-election. FEMA
should pay careful attention to how it is portrayed
by the public," Garcelon wrote in the memo, conveying
"the team effort theme at every opportunity"
alongside state and local officials, the insurance and
construction industries, and relief agencies such as
the Red Cross."
Gov. Bush received the memo Sept. 30,
2004 shortly before a swell of payments made its way
to residents in Miami-Dade who did not sustain damage
as a result of Hurricane Frances.
A couple of weeks before Gov. Bush received the memo
from Garcelon, Orlando J. Cabrera, executive director
of the Florida Housing Finance Corp. and a member of
the governor's Hurricane Housing Work Group, said in
a different memo to Gov. Bush that FEMA was allocating
short-term rental assistance to "everyone who needs
it, without asking for much information of any kind,"
the Sentinel reported.
In addition, "standard housing assistance,"
of up to $25,600, Cabrera wrote, is "liberally
provided without significant scrutiny of the request
made during the initial months; scrutiny increases remarkably
and the package is far more stringent after an unspecified
time."
The DHS audit report found that, under Brown, FEMA
erroneously distributed to Miami-Dade residents:
$8.2 million in rental assistance to 4,308 applicants
in the county who "did not indicate a need for
shelter" when they registered for help. In 60
cases reviewed by auditors, inspectors deemed homes
unsafe without explanation, and applicants never moved
out.
$720,403 to 228 people for belongings based on their
word alone.
$192,592 for generators, air purifiers, wet/dry
vacuum cleaners, chainsaws and other items without
proof that they were needed to deal with the hurricane.
Three applicants got generators for their homes, plus
rental assistance from FEMA to live somewhere else.
$15,743 for three funerals without sufficient documentation
that the deaths were due to the hurricane.
$46,464 to 64 residents for temporary housing even
though they had homeowners insurance. FEMA funds cannot
be used when costs are covered by insurance.
$17,424 in rental assistance to 24 people who reported
that their homes were not damaged.
$97,500 for 15 automobiles with a "blue book"
value of $56,140. In general, the report states that
FEMA approved claims for damaged vehicles without
properly verifying that the losses were caused by
the storm.
Jason Leopold is the author of the explosive memoir,
News Junkie, to be released in the spring of 2006 by
Process/Feral House Books. Visit Leopold's website at
www.jasonleopold.com for updates. |
NEW ORLEANS - The bodies of more
than 40 mostly elderly patients were found in a flooded-out
hospital in the biggest known cluster of corpses to
be discovered so far in hurricane-ravaged New Orleans.
The exact circumstances under which they died were
unclear, with at least one hospital official saying
Monday that some of the patients had died before the
storm, while the others succumbed to causes unrelated
to Katrina.
The announcement, which could raise Louisiana's death
toll to nearly 280, came as President Bush got his first
up-close look at the destruction, and business owners
were let back in to assess the damage and begin the
slow process of starting over.
Meanwhile, encouraging signs of recovery were all around:
Nearly two-thirds of southeastern Louisiana's water
treatment plants were up and running. Louis Armstrong
New Orleans International Airport planned to open to
limited passenger service Tuesday. A plane carrying
equipment to rebuild the city's mobile phone networks
took off from Sweden. And 41 of 174 permanent pumps
were in operation, on pace to help drain this still
half-flooded city by Oct. 8.
In Washington, Federal Emergency
Management Agency director Mike Brown announced he was
resigning "in the best interest of the agency and
best interest of the president."
Brown has been vilified for the government's slow and
unfocused response to a disaster that is already being
called the nation's costliest hurricane ever.
The bodies were found Sunday at the 317-bed Memorial
Medical Center, but the exact number was unclear. Bob
Johannesen, a spokesman for the state Department of
Health and Hospitals, said 45 patients had been found;
hospital assistant administrator David Goodson said
there were 44, plus three on the grounds.
Also unclear was exactly how the patients
died.
Goodson said patients died while waiting to be evacuated
over the four days after the hurricane hit, as temperatures
inside the hospital reached 106 degrees.
"I would suggest that that had a lot to do with"
the deaths, he said of the heat.
Family members and nurses were "literally standing
over the patients, fanning them," he said.
Steven Campanini, a spokesman for the hospital's owner,
Tenet Healthcare Corp., said some of the patients were
dead in the hospital's morgue before the storm arrived,
and none of the deaths resulted from lack of food, water
or electricity to power medical equipment. Campanini
said many of the patients were seriously ill before
Katrina hit.
Police Chief Eddie Compass declined to answer any questions,
including whether officers received any calls for help
from those inside the hospital after it was evacuated.
Dr. Jeffrey Kochan, a Philadelphia radiologist volunteering
in New Orleans, said he spoke with members of the team
that recovered the bodies from the hospital in the city's
Uptown section. He said they told him they found 36
corpses floating on the first floor.
"These guys were just venting. They need to talk,"
he said. "They're seeing things no human being
should have to see."
Bush, in his third visit to New Orleans since the storm,
made his first foray to the streets Monday and toured
the city for 45 minutes aboard the back of a truck,
forcing him at times to duck to avoid low-hanging electrical
wires and branches. [...]
Insurance experts have doubled to at least $40 billion
their estimate of insured losses caused by Katrina.
Risk Management Solutions Inc.
of Newark, Calif., put the total economic damage at
more than $125 billion. [...]
"The really positive thing
long-term is, the core of our infrastructure of the
$5 billion to $8 billion tourism industry remained intact,"
Perry said. "As odd as it may sound right now,
we are optimistic that this recovery is not only going
to happen, its going to happen well and we're going
to have a great city going again."
The discovery at Memorial Medical Center was not the
first where workers have recovered a group of bodies
from a health care facility.
Saturday, a recovery team found eight bodies inside
Bethany Home, an assisted-living center near City Park.
On Monday, mortuary workers removed human remains from
Lafon Nursing Home of the Holy Family, but authorities
would not disclose the exact number of victims.
One side of the entrance to Lafon was spray-painted
with the date "9-2" and the words "59
live" and "16 dead," while the other
side was spray-painted with the date "9-9"
and the notation "14 dead."
Inside the nursing home, the pale-brown water mark
on the first floor was about 2 1/2 feet up the wall.
On the second floor, spray-paint markings indicated
where some bodies had been found: one under a hallway
bulletin board, one in a community room, two beside
an elevator.
Individual rooms were filled with personal belongings
- pictures of friends, personal cards, flowers. In one
room was a neatly folded copy of The Times-Picayune
with the headline, "Katrina Takes Aim." |
Toxic chemicals in the New Orleans
flood waters will make the city unsafe for full human
habitation for a decade, a US government official has
told The Independent on Sunday. And, he added, the Bush
administration is covering up the danger.
In an exclusive interview, Hugh Kaufman, an expert
on toxic waste and responses to environmental disasters
at the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), said
the way the polluted water was being pumped out was
increasing the danger to health.
The pollution was far worse than had been admitted,
he said, because his agency was failing to take enough
samples and was refusing to make public the results
of those it had analysed. "Inept political hacks"
running the clean-up will imperil the health of low-income
migrant workers by getting them to do the work.
His intervention came as President Bush's approval
ratings fell below 40 per cent for the first time. Yesterday,
Britain's Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, turned
the screw by criticising the US President's opposition
to the Kyoto protocol on global warming. He compared
New Orleans to island nations such as the Maldives,
which are threatened by rising sea levels. Other
US sources spelt out the extent of the danger from one
of America's most polluted industrial areas, known locally
as "Cancer Alley". The 66 chemical plants,
refineries and petroleum storage depots churn out 600m
lb of toxic waste each year. Other dangerous substances
are in site storage tanks or at the port of New Orleans.
No one knows how much pollution has escaped through
damaged plants and leaking pipes into the "toxic
gumbo" now drowning the city. Mr Kaufman says no
one is trying to find out.
Few people are better qualified to judge the extent
of the problem. Mr Kaufman, who has been with the EPA
since it was founded 35 years ago, helped to set up
its hazardous waste programme. After serving as chief
investigator to the EPA's ombudsman, he is now senior
policy analyst in its Office of Solid Wastes and Emergency
Response. He said the clean-up
needed to be "the most massive public works exercise
ever done", adding: "It will take 10 years
to get everything up and running and safe."
Mr Kaufman claimed the Bush administration was playing
down the need for a clean-up: the EPA has not been included
in the core White House group tackling the crisis. "Its
budget has been cut and inept political hacks have been
put in key positions," Mr Kaufman said. "All
the money for emergency response has gone to buy guns
and cowboys - which don't do anything when a hurricane
hits. We were less prepared for this than we would have
been on 10 September 2001."
He said the water being pumped out
of the city was not being tested for pollution and would
damage Lake Pontchartrain and the Mississippi river,
and endanger people using it downstream. |
The
chances of the Earth being hit by a comet from beyond
Pluto - a la Armageddon - are much lower than previously
thought, according to new research by an ANU astronomer.
Using computer simulations and data
from an American military telescope, Dr Paul Francis,
from the ANU Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics
at Mt Stromlo, has found there are seven times fewer comets
in our solar system than previously thought.
'I calculate that small comets,
capable of destroying a city, only hit the Earth once
every 40 million years or so," Dr Francis
said. "Big continent-busting
comets, as shown in the movies Armageddon and Deep Impact,
are rarer still, only hitting once every 150 million years
or so. So I don't loose sleep over it, but you're still
more likely to be killed by a comet than to win the jackpot
at Lotto."
Previous estimates of the number of comets were based
on the work of amateur astronomers, who for hundreds of
years have been scanning the skies, looking for new comets.
Previously, it was believed that these amateur astronomers
were only spotting three per cent of the comets passing
close to the Earth: the rest were thought to be missed
because they were in the wrong part of the sky or were
too faint.
But Dr Francis found that the amateurs were doing better
than anyone had realised - they were actually spotting
20 per cent of comets. There are therefore far fewer undiscovered
comets.
"The new data allowed us to count the number of
faint and far-away comets that the amateurs had missed.
And we found that they were pretty rare," Dr Francis
said.
These results apply to comets coming from beyond the
orbit of Pluto, which is where most comets live. The Earth
is still at risk of being hit by asteroids, and by so-called
short-period comets - ones that come past repeatedly,
like Halley's comet.
"But asteroids and short-period comets come past
again and again, so if we're clever enough we can find
them all and predict which, if any, will hit the Earth,"
said Dr Francis. "If we find
one on a collision course with the Earth, we would normally
have hundreds of years warning in which to do something
about it, like deflecting the asteroid.
"The comets coming from beyond Pluto,
so called long-period comets, are nastier, as they are
totally unpredictable, and if we see one on a collision
course we'd have at best one or two years warning - not
long enough to do anything."
Dr Francis' research has been accepted for publication
in the Astrophysical Journal. It was based on computer
simulations, published data from the Lincoln Near Earth
Asteroid Research Project at White Sands Missile Range
in New Mexico, and on data from amateur astronomers around
the world.
Further Information
Background material on Dr Francis' research
http://www.mso.anu.edu.au/~pfrancis/comets/
|
PORTLAND, Oregon (Reuters)
- A large, slow-growing volcanic
bulge in Western Oregon is attracting the attention of
seismologists who say that the rising ground could be
the beginnings of a volcano or simply magma shifting underground.
Scientists said that the 100 square-mile (260 sq-km)
bulge, first discovered by satellite, poses no immediate
threat to nearby residents.
"It is perfectly safe for
anyone over there," said Michael Lisowski,
geophysicist at the United States Geological Survey's
Cascades Volcano Observatory in Vancouver, Washington.
The bulge is rising at a rate of about 1.4 inches per
year, according to a report issued by the U.S. Geological
Survey.
The bulge is located in a sparsely populated area 3 miles
southwest of South Sister, a mountain 25 miles west of
Bend, Oregon.
Lisowski said the unnamed bulge was created because of
a big cavity, estimated to be about 4.5 miles below the
surface, that is filling with fluid.
The fluid is likely magma, but could also be water. It
was described in the report as a lake 1 mile across and
65 feet deep.
The bulge is a bare patch of land with no residents,
and anyone in the area would not be able to see, feel
or smell anything, seismologists said.
South Sister is one of three volcanic peaks called The
Three Sisters, which are part of the Cascade mountain
range. The range includes four of the 18 most active volcanoes
in the United States, according to the U.S. Geological
Survey.
The South Sister probably erupted last time about 2,000
years ago, seismologists said.
Further north, the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens
killed 57 people, destroyed at least 230 square miles
of forest and spewed ash for hundreds of miles.
Mount St. Helens has rumbled back to life recently, spitting
lava, rocks and ash, but has not had another big eruption.
A lava dome is growing in the huge crater
created in Mount St. Helens, but that event appears to
be unrelated to the South Sister bulge, seismologists
said.
"Growth of the new lava dome inside the crater of
Mount St. Helens continues, accompanied by low rates of
seismicity, low emissions of steam and volcanic gases,
and minor production of ash," the U.S. Geological
Survey said in a daily report.
Scientists said they would continue to monitor the bulge,
most likely over a number of years.
"We haven't seen anything like this in the Cascade
range," Lisowski says, "although we have only
been looking in the last 20 years." |
Astronomers have witnessed
the most distant cosmic explosion on record: a gamma-ray
burst that has come from the edge of the visible Universe.
Gamma-ray bursts are intense flares of high-energy radiation
that appear without warning from across the cosmos.
They can release as much energy in a few minutes as our
Sun will emit in its expected 10-billion-year lifetime.
The blast was observed by the Swift space telescope and
by a number of ground-based observatories.
The latest, record gamma-ray burst was
detected on 4 September, 2005, and lasted about three
minutes. It probably marked the death of a massive star
as it collapsed into a black hole.
It has a so-called redshift of 6.29, which translates
to a distance of about 13 billion light-years from Earth.
Used by astronomers to measure cosmic distances, redshift
refers to the extent to which light is shifted towards
the red part of the electromagnetic spectrum during its
long journey across the Universe. The greater the distance,
the higher the redshift.
Record distance
"This burst smashes the old distance record by 500
million light-years," said Dr Daniel Reichart, of
the University of North Carolina, US, who has been leading
the measurement of its distance.
Professor Keith Mason, chief executive of the UK's Particle
Physics and Astronomy Research Council (PParc), which
helped fund Swift, commented: "This is an amazing
result that will enable us to find out more about stars
from near the beginning of time."
By studying objects at this distance, astronomers are
looking into the Universe's early times. The burst comes
from an era soon after stars and galaxies first formed,
about one billion years after the Big Bang.
Dr Nial Tanvir, of the University of Hertfordshire, UK,
who is an investigator on the Swift mission, said the
telescope could yet spot more distant bursts hailing from
even earlier stages in the Universe's evolution.
"I think you could see them just a few hundred million
years after the Big Bang. We don't know whether there
were any stars at that time, but we should be able to
see them at that distance if there were," he told
the BBC News website. [...] |
The former head of
Israeli forces in the Gaza Strip has told how he dodged
arrest on war crimes charges after receiving a tip-off
at Heathrow.
Major General Doron Almog is accused of breaching international
laws during Israel's occupation of the Gaza Strip.
He said he had flown straight home after the Israeli
military attache had warned him not to leave his El Al
jet.
Lawyers acting for the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights
said a UK court had issued a warrant for his arrest.
Solicitors Hickman and Rose said the 54-year-old had
been due to be arrested on suspicion of committing a breach
of the Fourth Geneva Convention 1949, which is a criminal
offence in the UK under the Geneva Conventions Act 1957.
Senior District Judge Timothy Workman had given the police
authority to detain Maj Gen Almog during a hearing at
Bow Street Magistrates' Court in central London, the law
firm added.
The warrant relates to the bulldozing
of more than 50 houses in the Rafah refugee camp in the
Gaza Strip, when Maj Gen Almog was head of Israel's Southern
Command.
It was seen as retaliation for an assault
by Islamic militants on an Israeli Army post that left
four soldiers dead.
Also under Maj Gen Almog's command, Israel
dropped a one-ton bomb on a Hamas leader's home, killing
the man, an assistant and 14 civilians, nine of them children.
Maj Gen Almog said he had arrived at Heathrow for a three-day
visit to raise money for a centre in Israel for brain-damaged
children.
"We were about to get off the plane, then one of
the stewards came up to me and said the pilot asked that
I disembark last," he told Israeli Army Radio.
"After some time, the chief steward said the Israeli
military attache was on his way and wanted to speak to
me.
"I phoned him and he told me not to get off the
plane."
He and his wife had remained on the plane and flown back
to Israel on its return, Maj Gen Almog added.
Any Israeli officer could now be arrested
in Britain simply for having performed their duty, he
said.
"They could do this tomorrow to
any officer who has served in the Israeli army over the
past five years and has fought the hard fight against
terror."
But former legal adviser to the Israeli Foreign Ministry
Robbie Sable said it was unlikely Maj Gen Almog would
have been arrested.
"Courts in organised countries do not act on malicious
litigation and this was definitely malicious litigation,"
he added.
The Israeli Foreign Ministry said it was taking the incident
seriously and seeking clarification from British authorities.
Officials at the British Embassy in Tel Aviv refused
to comment. |
Scotland
Yard was urged yesterday to launch a criminal investigation
into officials at the Israeli embassy in London who helped
a retired Israeli general wanted in Britain for war crimes
to escape arrest. Doron Almog arrived on Sunday
at Heathrow for a private visit to the UK. Unknown to
him, a British court had issued a warrant for his arrest
for war crimes on Saturday and detectives were waiting
at the airport.
Mr Almog told the Guardian yesterday that, as he prepared
to leave the plane, he was advised to wait by the cabin
crew. Israel's military attache in London then arrived
on the plane to inform him that he faced arrest. Mr Almog
stayed on the El Al plane until it flew back to Israel.
The 53-year-old former general told the Guardian: "I
don't know how he [the military attache] found out but
I am glad he did. It was also fortunate that I was flying
with El Al as they are loyal. I don't know what would
have happened if I had been on a British Airways flight."
The war crimes arrest warrant was issued
over allegations that Mr Almog ordered the destruction
of 59 civilian homes in Gaza, in breach of the Geneva
convention. Yesterday a lawyer representing the alleged
Palestinian victims demanded that police investigate the
actions of Israeli diplomats in aiding Mr Almog's hasty
departure. Daniel Machover said Israeli officials had
been involved in "calculated interference" in
thwarting British justice. "There needs to be a criminal
investigation of the actions taken by Israeli embassy
staff. They are not located here to assist Israelis to
evade British justice," he said.
Mr Machover also called for a police
inquiry into how the information was leaked to the Israeli
embassy and how the Israeli diplomat got through various
layers of security at Heathrow to board the plane and
warn Mr Almog.
Amnesty International criticised British police yesterday
for failing to execute the warrant. "He could have
been arrested; under UK law there is no reason for not
arresting him once he's on UK soil," the human rights
group said. Mr Almog was due to visit Jewish communities
in Birmingham, Leicester and London to raise money for
a centre for disabled children. His son Eran, 20, is severely
disabled.
He said that neither he nor his country had any case
to answer for the deaths of innocent Palestinians in their
battle against militants. "As a soldier and a general
I have never committed a crime. Many times I have saved
Palestinian lives by risking my life and the lives of
my soldiers," he said. The actions of the army in
Gaza were to prevent terrorist attacks against Israel,
he said. Mr Almog was head of Israel's southern command
during the second intifada between 2000 and 2003.
He said he had no intention of returning to Britain to
defend himself in court. "This is not about me versus
the British legal system, it is against the state of Israel,"
he said. Scotland Yard refused to answer any questions,
including why detectives failed to board the plane to
arrest Mr Almog, whether there was any investigation into
the role of Israeli diplomats in helping him evade capture
at the airport.
"We are not prepared to discuss at this stage anything
to do with this episode," said a spokesman for Scotland
Yard. |
Last week the Haaretz
headline screamed: "Doctors: Arafat died of AIDS
or poisoning". AIDS appeared in first place.
For dozens of years, the Israeli media has conducted,
with government inspiration, a concentrated campaign against
the Palestinian leader (with the sole exception of Haolam
Hazeh, the news magazine I edited). Millions of words
of hatred and demonization were poured on him, more than
on any other person of his generation. If somebody thought
that this would end after his death, he was mistaken.
This article, signed by Avi Isasharof and Amos Harel,
is a direct continuation of this smear campaign.
The key word is, of course, "Aids". Throughout
the long article there is no trace of proof for this allegation.
The reporters quote "sources in the Israeli security
establishment". They also quote Israeli doctors "who
heard from French doctors" - an original method for
medical diagnosis. A respected Israeli professor even
found conclusive proof: it was not published that Arafat
had undergone an Aids test. True, a Tunisian medical team
did test him in Ramallah and the result was negative,
but who would believe Arabs?
Haaretz knows, of course, how to protect itself. Somewhere
in the article, far away from the sensational headline,
there appear the nine words: "The possibility that
Arafat had Aids is not high". So Haaretz is alright.
In army parlance, its ass is covered. By comparison, the
New York Times, which published a similar story on the
same day, treated the Aids allegation with contempt.
There is a very simple proof for the spuriousness of
the allegation: if it had even the most tenuous basis
in fact, the huge propaganda apparatus of the Israeli
government and the Jewish establishment throughout the
world would have trumpeted it from the rooftops, instead
of waiting for 10 months. But, as matter of fact, there
is no evidence whatsoever. More than that, the writers
themselves are compelled to admit that Arafat's symptoms
are completely incompatible with the picture of Aids.
So what did he die of?
Since taking part in his tumultuous funeral in Ramallah,
I have abstained from giving my opinion on the cause of
his death. I am not a doctor, and my dozens of years as
editor of an investigative news magazine have taught me
not to voice allegations which I am unable to prove in
court.
But, since now all dikes have been breached, I am prepared
to say what is on my mind: from the first moment, I was
sure that Arafat had been poisoned.
Most of the doctors interviewed by Haaretz testified
that the symptoms point towards poisoning, and, in fact,
are incompatible with any other cause. The report of the
French doctors, who treated Arafat during the last two
weeks of his life, states that no known cause for his
death was discovered. True, the tests did not find any
traces of poison in his body - but the tests were conducted
only for the usual poisons. It is no secret that many
intelligence services in the world have developed poisons
that cannot be detected at all, or whose traces disappear
in a very short time.
Some years ago, Israeli agents poisoned the Hamas chief
Khaled Mash'al with a slight prick in a main street of
Amman. His life was saved only because King Hussein demanded
that Israel immediately provide the antidote. (As a further
indemnity, Binyamin Netanyahu agreed to the release from
prison of another Hamas chief, Sheik Ahmed Yassin, who
was assassinated several years after his return to Gaza
by more conventional means - an airborne missile.)
In the absence of symptoms of any known disease, and
since clear indications of poisoning were present, the
highest probability is that Yasser Arafat was indeed poisoned
while having dinner four hours before the first symptoms
appeared.
I can testify that the security arrangements around the
Ra'is were very lax. At each of my dozens of meetings
with him in different countries I was always amazed at
the ease with which a potential assassin could have done
his job. Protection was always casual, especially compared
to the way Israeli Prime Ministers are guarded. He often
had his meals in the company of strangers, he embraced
his visitors. Associates report that he frequently accepted
sweets from strangers and also took medicines from visitors,
swallowing them on the spot. After surviving dozens of
assassination attempts, and even an airplane accident,
he had come to adopt a fatalistic attitude, "it's
all in the hands of Allah". I think that in his heart
of hearts he really believed that Allah would preserve
him until the completion of his historic mission.
If he was poisoned - by whom was he poisoned?
First suspicion falls, of course, on the Israeli security
establishment. Indeed, Ariel Sharon declared on several
occasions that he intended to kill him. The subject came
up in cabinet meetings. Twice during the last years my
friends and I were so convinced that this was imminent,
that we went to the Mukata'ah in Ramallah to serve as
a "human shield" for him. We were convinced
that the murder of Arafat would cause much harm to Israel.
In one of his interviews, Sharon stated that our presence
there had prevented his liquidation.
Truth is that Sharon abstained from killing Arafat mostly
because the Americans forbade it. They were afraid that
the murder would arouse a huge storm in the Arab world
and exacerbate anti-American terrorism. But this interdiction
may have applied only to an overt act.
The Mash'al affair proves that the Israeli intelligence
services have the means to poison people without leaving
any trace. The poisoning was discovered only because the
perpetrators were caught in flagrante.
However, a probability, high as it may be, is not proof.
At the moment, there is no proof that Arafat was indeed
poisoned by the Israeli services.
But if not the Israelis, who? The US intelligence services
also have the necessary capabilities. President Bush never
hid his hatred for Arafat, an obstinate leader who did
not submit to his dictates. He was quick to embrace Mahmoud
Abbas. Even now, American emissaries who visit the Mukata'ah
pointedly abstain from putting wreaths on the grave of
the Ra'is in the courtyard.
But American interests, too, do not constitute proof.
One can think of several other suspects, even in the Arab
world.
Did Arafat's death benefit Sharon?
On the face of it, no. As long as Arafat was alive, American
support for Israel was unlimited. But since his death,
President Bush has been going out of his way to support
his successor. The dismal American debacle in Iraq compels
Bush to look for achievements elsewhere in the "Broader
Middle East". He presents Mahmoud Abbas as a symbol
of the new winds blowing through the Arab and Muslim world
as a result of American policy. In order to convince the
Palestinian public to support Abbas, Bush is putting pressure
on Sharon of a new sort. Perhaps Sharon is secretly longing
for the good old days of Arafat, when life was simple
and an enemy dressed the part.
But a person who wants - as Sharon surely does - to break
the Palestinian people into pieces and prevent at any
cost the establishment of a viable State of Palestine,
can only be happy with the demise of Arafat, who united
the entire Palestinian people. He had the moral authority
to impose order, and he enforced it by empathy and force,
human wisdom and tricks, threats and seduction.
There are many people in Israel who hoped that without
him the Palestinian society would break apart, that anarchy
would destroy its very foundations, that armed factions
would kill each other and the national leadership. They
are certainly glad that Arafat is dead and pray for the
failure of Mahmoud Abbas.
Arafat assured me once that we would both see peace in
our lifetime. He was prevented from seeing the day. He
who caused this - whoever he is - has sinned not only
against the Palestinian people, but also against peace,
and therefore against Israel. |
A VIDEO claiming
that Melbourne will be the target of an al-Qaeda attack
reinforced the need for tough terrorism laws, according
to Prime Minister John Howard.
But he said the man featured
in the video had made similar threats before and not
delivered. He urged the people of Melbourne not
to be put off attending events such as the Commonwealth
Games.
The State Government yesterday urged Victorians to
remain calm after Melbourne and Los Angeles were named
on the video televised on ABC News in America at the
weekend as the next possible terrorist targets. Attorney-General
Philip Ruddock told Parliament that intelligence agencies
examining the video believed it was authentic, but he
said that did not mean its message was anything more
than rhetoric.
The masked speaker on the video is believed to be Adam
Gadahn, of southern California, who threatens attacks
on the two cities, "Allah willing," and warns
that the attackers will show no compassion.
"Yesterday, London and Madrid. Tomorrow, Los Angeles
and Melbourne," he says.
"We love peace, but peace on our terms."
Gadahn, who apparently converted to Islam at an Orange
County mosque as a teenager, was believed to have been
the young American who appeared in another threatening
tape about year ago.
Premier Steve Bracks said he was confident that Melbourne
was well equipped to deal with a potential attack -
if the video threat was genuine.
He also ruled out increasing security that had already
been planned for major events because the existing arrangements
were "second to none".
"This video is designed to instil
fear," he said. "That's what it's designed
to do, and of course, we would be playing into the hands
of the people who perpetrated this media exercise …
if all of a sudden, we said yes, we're fearful."
"The reality is we have very sound, secure, security
arrangements in place."
Federal Opposition Leader Kim Beazley said the Government
was wrong to rely on tougher laws when practical steps
were needed to stop terrorists launching an attack on
Melbourne by hijacking aircraft at regional airports.
In New York for the United Nations world summit, Mr
Howard said Australia had clearly been a terrorist target
long before the September 11, 2001, attacks. No
Government could credibly guarantee there would be no
terrorist attack.
"But we can commit ourselves, as we have done,
to do everything we can to strengthen our domestic capacity
to stop terrorist attacks occurring in the first place,"
he said.
Mr Howard said such threats were not going to stop
the Commonwealth Games.
"The best response to things
like this is to redouble our protective efforts, which
we are doing, but also to get on with life, which we
are also doing." |
SANTA ANA, Calif. - Two men pleaded
not guilty Monday to federal charges alleging they planned
terrorist attacks against military facilities, the Israeli
Consulate and other targets in the Los Angeles area.
Levar Haley Washington, 25, and Gregory Vernon Patterson,
21, were ordered held without bail after their pleas
in U.S. District Court.
"In the name of Allah, I plead not guilty,"
Washington said before U.S. Magistrate Judge Arthur
Nakazato.
Prosecutors contend the plot was orchestrated by Washington,
Patterson and Hammad Riaz Samana, 21, at the behest
of Kevin James, an inmate of the California State Prison,
Sacramento. James founded the radical group Jamiyyat
Ul-Islam Is-Saheeh, or JIS.
All four men face counts of conspiracy to wage war
against the U.S. government through terrorism, kill
armed service members and murder foreign officials,
among other charges, according to an indictment
All but Samana are American born and
Muslim converts.
Counterterrorism officials have said
they found no evidence directly connecting the group
to al-Qaida or other foreign terror networks.
Samana, a Pakistani national, pleaded not guilty to
federal charges last week. He was imprisoned for attempted
robbery in Los Angeles County, prosecutors said.
Washington, Patterson and Samana - who attended the
same Inglewood mosque - allegedly conducted surveillance
of military sites, synagogues, the Israeli Consulate
and El Al airline facilities in the Los Angeles area. |
The videotape of the suicide bomber
Mohammad Sidique Khan has switched the focus of the
London bombings away from the establishment view of
brainwashed, murderous individuals and highlighted a
starker political reality. While there can be no justification
for horrific killings of this kind, they need to be
understood against the ferment of the last decade radicalising
Muslim youth of Pakistani origin living in Europe.
During the Soviet occupation
of Afghanistan in the 1980s, the US funded large numbers
of jihadists through Pakistan's secret intelligence
service, the ISI. Later the US wanted to raise
another jihadi corps, again using proxies, to help Bosnian
Muslims fight to weaken the Serb government's hold on
Yugoslavia. Those they turned to included Pakistanis
in Britain.
According to a recent report by the Delhi-based Observer
Research Foundation, a contingent was also sent by the
Pakistani government, then led by Benazir Bhutto, at
the request of the Clinton administration. This contingent
was formed from the Harkat-ul-Ansar (HUA) terrorist
group and trained by the ISI. The report estimates that
about 200 Pakistani Muslims living in the UK went to
Pakistan, trained in HUA camps and joined the HUA's
contingent in Bosnia. Most significantly,
this was "with the full knowledge and complicity
of the British and American intelligence agencies".
As the 2002 Dutch government report
on Bosnia makes clear, the US provided a green light
to groups on the state department list of terrorist
organisations, including the Lebanese-based Hizbullah,
to operate in Bosnia - an episode that calls into question
the credibility of the subsequent "war on terror".
For nearly a decade the US helped Islamist insurgents
linked to Chechnya, Iran and Saudi Arabia destabilise
the former Yugoslavia. The insurgents were also allowed
to move further east to Kosovo. By the end of the fighting
in Bosnia there were tens of thousands of Islamist insurgents
in Bosnia, Croatia and Kosovo; many then moved west
to Austria, Germany and Switzerland.
Less well known is evidence of the British government's
relationship with a wider Islamist terrorist network.
During an interview on Fox TV this summer, the former
US federal prosecutor John Loftus reported that British
intelligence had used the al-Muhajiroun group in London
to recruit Islamist militants with British passports
for the war against the Serbs in Kosovo. Since July
Scotland Yard has been interested in an alleged member
of al-Muhajiroun, Haroon Rashid Aswat, who some sources
have suggested could have been behind the London bombings.
According to Loftus, Aswat was detained in Pakistan
after leaving Britain, but was released after 24 hours.
He was subsequently returned to Britain from Zambia,
but has been detained solely for extradition to the
US, not for questioning about the London bombings. Loftus
claimed that Aswat is a British-backed double agent,
pursued by the police but protected by MI6.
One British Muslim of Pakistani origin radicalised
by the civil war in Yugoslavia was LSE-educated Omar
Saeed Sheikh. He is now in jail in Pakistan under sentence
of death for the killing of the US journalist Daniel
Pearl in 2002 - although many (including Pearl's widow
and the US authorities) doubt that he committed the
murder. However, reports from Pakistan suggest that
Sheikh continues to be active from jail, keeping in
touch with friends and followers in Britain.
Sheikh was recruited as a student by Jaish-e-Muhammad
(Army of Muhammad), which operates a network in Britain.
It has actively recruited Britons from universities
and colleges since the early 1990s, and has boasted
of its numerous British Muslim volunteers. Investigations
in Pakistan have suggested that on his visits there
Shehzad Tanweer, one of the London suicide bombers,
contacted members of two outlawed local groups and trained
at two camps in Karachi and near Lahore. Indeed the
network of groups now being uncovered in Pakistan may
point to senior al-Qaida operatives having played a
part in selecting members of the bombers' cell. The
Observer Research Foundation has argued that there are
even "grounds to suspect that the [London] blasts
were orchestrated by Omar Sheikh from his jail in Pakistan".
Why then is Omar Sheikh not
being dealt with when he is already under sentence of
death? Astonishingly his appeal to a higher court against
the sentence was adjourned in July for the 32nd time
and has since been adjourned indefinitely. This
is all the more remarkable when this is the same Omar
Sheikh who, at the behest of General Mahmood Ahmed,
head of the ISI, wired $100,000 to Mohammed Atta, the
leading 9/11 hijacker, before the New York attacks,
as confirmed by Dennis Lormel, director of FBI's financial
crimes unit.
Yet neither Ahmed nor Omar appears to have been sought
for questioning by the US about 9/11. Indeed, the official
9/11 Commission Report of July 2004 sought to downplay
the role of Pakistan with the comment: "To date,
the US government has not been able to determine the
origin of the money used for the 9/11 attacks. Ultimately
the question is of little practical significance"
- a statement of breathtaking disingenuousness.
All this highlights the resistance to getting at the
truth about the 9/11 attacks and to an effective crackdown
on the forces fomenting terrorist bombings in the west,
including Britain. The extraordinary US forbearance
towards Omar Sheikh, its restraint towards the father
of Pakistan's atomic bomb, Dr AQ Khan, selling nuclear
secrets to Iran, Libya and North Korea, the huge US
military assistance to Pakistan and the US decision
last year to designate Pakistan as a major non-Nato
ally in south Asia all betoken a deeper strategic set
of goals as the real priority in its relationship with
Pakistan. These might be surmised as Pakistan providing
sizeable military contingents for Iraq to replace US
troops, or Pakistani troops replacing Nato forces in
Afghanistan. Or it could involve
the use of Pakistani military bases for US intervention
in Iran, or strengthening Pakistan as a base in relation
to India and China.
Whether the hunt for those behind the London bombers
can prevail against these powerful political forces
remains to be seen. Indeed it may depend on whether
Scotland Yard, in its attempts to uncover the truth,
can prevail over MI6, which is trying to cover its tracks
and in practice has every opportunity to operate beyond
the law under the cover of national security.
Michael Meacher is the Labour MP for Oldham West
and Royton; he was environment minister from 1997 to
2003. |
The U.S. has a long-standing (and
accelerating) policy of arming, training and aiding
some of the world's most repressive regimes.
As insecurity mounts from Najaf to New Orleans, more
weapons and high-tech military equipment are flowing
into some of the globe's most vulnerable and war-torn
regions.
The Congressional Research Service recently found that
global arms sales rose to $37 billion in 2004 -- the
highest level since 2000. U.S.
companies such as Lockheed Martin and Boeing rang up
$12.4 billion in weapons contracts -- more than one-third
of the total and more than twice what Russia -- the
second largest exporter -- sold. The Departments
of State, Commerce and Defense are all involved in different
aspects of approving licenses, managing logistics and
(in many cases) loaning or granting funds to nations
as they seek weapons from U.S. corporations.
The findings, published in the annual "Conventional
Weapons Transfers to Developing Nations" report,
were released against the backdrop of the global war
on terror in which many countries are increasing military
spending as insecurity rises. They also came in the
wake of rampant and irresponsible use of guns in the
hurricane-ravaged Southeast that hindered aid delivery,
increased tension and led to more misery and suffering.
The U.S. has a long-standing (and
accelerating) policy of arming, training and aiding
some of the world's most repressive regimes. Close
anti-terrorism allies include the authoritarian Uzbekistan
and the thinly veiled military dictatorship of Gen.
Pervez Musharraf in Pakistan. In the Philippines,
Colombia and elsewhere, U.S. weapons and military training
have been turned against civilians. From Indonesia to
the Sudan, U.S. geopolitical interests and access to
resources are trumping concerns about human rights,
ongoing conflict and the pressing need for development.
The U.S. transfers more weapons and military services
than any other country in the world. In the last decade,
the U.S. sold $177.5 billion in arms to foreign nations.
In 2003, the last year for which full data is available,
the Pentagon and State Department delivered or licensed
the delivery of $5.7 billion in weaponry to countries
which can ill afford advanced weaponry -- nations in
the developing world saddled with debt and struggling
with poverty.
Despite having some of the world's
strongest laws regulating the arms trade, almost half
of these weapons went to countries plagued with ongoing
conflict and governed by undemocratic regimes with poor
human rights records. In
2003, $2.7 billion in weaponry went to governments deemed
undemocratic by the U.S. State Department's Human Rights
Report, in the sense that citizens of those nations
"did not have a meaningful right to change their
government" in a peaceful manner. Another $97.4
million in weapons went to governments deemed by the
State Department to have "poor" human rights
records.
The U.S. transferred weaponry to 18 of the 25 countries
involved in active conflicts in 2003, the last year
for which full Pentagon data is available. From Chad
to Ethiopia, from Algeria to India, transfers to conflict
nations through the two largest arms sales programs
totaled more than $1 billion. When poor human rights
records, serious patterns of abuse and histories of
conflict are all factored in, 20 of the top 25 U.S.
arms clients in the developing world in 2003 -- a full
80 percent -- were either undemocratic regimes or governments
with records of major human rights abuses.
That's unacceptable. It's time
that President Bush begin to honor his pledge to "end
tyranny in our world" as part of the war on terrorism
by overhauling U.S. weapons transfer policy.
Greater global security will follow.
Frida Berrigan is a Foreign Policy In Focus scholar
and a senior research associate with the Arms Trade
Resource Center, a project of the World Policy Institute.
This article originally appeared in the Star-Telegram. |
UNITED NATIONS (AP)
- Negotiators met into the early hours Tuesday to try
to reach agreement on a watered-down plan for reforming
the United Nations, having abandoned many of the sweeping
changes UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan recommended.
With some heads of state already in New York for Wednesday's
opening of a three-day UN summit, the diplomats were running
out of time for producing a substantive document for world
leaders to adopt.
Among those attending is Prime Minister Paul Martin,
who is expected to travel to New York before the 2005
World Summit officially begins Wednesday.
Mark Malloch Brown, the secretary-general's chief of
staff, said negotiations seemed more favourable than a
few days ago because "deadlines are starting to loosen
minds and positions."
"There's a threshold where we always knew we wouldn't
get the full loaf," he said. "We've got to start
counting slices. Half or more will do at this stage."
But Germany's UN Ambassador Gunter Pleuger said late
Monday that the divisions made it impossible to get "the
great reform" at this late date. Instead, he expected
either "a watered-down version" of the present
39-page text or "a shorter, more political text."
"It's tough going, sometimes rough going,"
said Pakistan's UN Ambassador Munir Akram.
Annan says the United Nations needs revamping if it is
to meet the challenges of the 21st century. He came out
with a list of recommendations in March that General Assembly
President Jean Ping turned into a draft summit document
in June. It has gone through numerous drafts.
The seven issues facing negotiators were terrorism; a
stronger Human Rights Council to replace the discredited
Human Rights Commission; a new Peacebuilding Commission
to help countries emerging from conflict; new responsibility
for governments to protect civilians from genocide and
war crimes; disarmament and nuclear weapons proliferation;
overhauling UN management; and the promotion of economic
development.
Annan also had urged the 191 UN member states to agree
on a plan to expand the powerful UN Security Council,
but the negotiations became so contentious the idea was
shelved last month.
Akram said the negotiators, ambassadors from 15 countries,
had agreed to language on terrorism, the Peacebuilding
Commission and on human rights. Negotiators were also
close to agreement on the responsibility to protect, but
still differed on management reforms, trade and climate
change, he said.
The Pakistani ambassador said he expected a larger group
of 32 countries to make a judgment Tuesday on whether
the entire text is sufficiently balanced to be presented
to all 191 UN members, "and then in the larger group
our hope is that nobody will pull it apart."
Many of the agreements were reached by leaving the most
contentious issues to further negotiations.
The latest language on the Human Rights Council, for
example, eliminates a two-thirds requirement for membership
and steps to consider making the council a permanent UN
organ.
Egyptian Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz said it was too early
to decide the council's status. "Let us give it a
chance to function, and then we will review it,"
he said.
His country favours a council that would be a subsidiary
body of the UN General Assembly.
Germany's Pleuger said that in hindsight, member states
underestimated the amount of preparatory work needed to
reach consensus.
The negotiating process also was thrown into disarray
when United States submitted hundreds of amendments a
few weeks ago, he said.
"We have reached a fork in the road," Annan
warned member states. "If you, the political leaders
of the world's nations, cannot reach agreement on the
way forward, history will take the decisions for you,
and the interests of your peoples may go by default."
|
BEIJING, Sept. 13
(Xinhuanet) -- Police in northern Ohio on Monday have
found 11 children locked in cages less than three-and-a-half
feet high inside a home, but the parents told authorities
they kept the kids in locked cages for their own protection.
The children, ages 1 to 14, were found locked
in nine cages built into the walls of the house near the
small US city of Wakeman in northern Ohio, according to
the Huron County Sheriff's Office. They had no blankets
or pillows, and the cages were rigged with alarms that
sounded if opened, said Lt. Randy Sommers.
The children told authorities they slept in the cages
- 40 inches high and 40 inches deep - at night. Doors
to some of the cages were blocked with heavy furniture.
Shortly after being found, the children were sent to
Fisher-Titus Medical Center in Norwalk, where they were
listed in good condition.
The children's parents, Mike and Sharon Gravelle, had
11 children in all, according to authorities.
The couple were reserved when deputies arrived at the
house to remove the children, Sommers said.
"The impression that we got was that they felt
it was OK," he said.
Investigators believe nine of the children slept in
the cages that were stacked two-high on the house's second
story. Two mattresses on a bedroom floor also showed signs
of recent use, Sommers said.
One of the boys said he'd slept in the cage for three
years, Sommers said.
Police said no charges had been filed against the parents.
"Basically, the parents thought they were providing
for the protection of the children from themselves and
from each other," said Sommers.
"They thought there was circumstances with these
children that warranted the cages at night," Sommers
added, but he would not go into details of what those
circumstances were. |
Charles Clarke said
today that hundreds of terror suspects were being closely
watched in Britain and there was "no doubt"
that the London bombers had links with foreign terrorists.
The home secretary said that the extent of those connections
- and whether they constitued a line of command - was
still being investigated.
Mr Clarke was answering questions from the home affairs
select committee of cross-party MPs about the July 7 suicide
bombings in London, which killed 52 innocent victims,
and the attempted attacks of July 21.
As the special session continues, the Metropolitan police
commissioner Sir Ian Blair is due to be questioned by
the committee this afternoon over the controversial "shoot-to-kill"
policy for dealing with suspected suicide bombers.
When asked about the link between British and foreign
terrorists, Mr Clarke replied: "There is no doubt
of a series of international relationships that were engaged
in. The extent to which there was some kind of command
and control we don't know at the moment, but we are trying
to find out precisely what that relationship is."
In particular, the video message left by one of the suicide
bombers, Mohammad Sidique Khan, was being closely analysed
for clues about where it was produced and by whom, and
how it was distributed, the home secretary said.
Mr Clarke was asked whether he stood by the prime minister's
statement earlier this year that hundreds of people were
plotting attacks in the country.
He said: "There are certainly hundreds of individuals
who we have been watching very closely and continue to
watch extremely closely.
"The word plotting is an interesting word. There
are certainly hundreds of people who we believe need to
be very closely surveyed because of the threat they offer."
He was also questioned over whether there had been any
intelligence failings before the attacks. Mr Clarke said
the government had intelligence, but no specific knowledge,
of the bombings.
"Intelligence is not knowledge," he said. "It
is an effort to understand the threats we face by a variety
of different techniques ... We didn't know, but we try
and acquire the best possible knowledge that we can."
Mr Clarke also revealed that Britain has strengthened
links with overseas intelligence organisations and security
resources at home had been increased since the July 7
attacks.
Sir Ian Blair faces questions over the "shoot-to-kill"
policy, but will not be forced to reveal details of the
fatal shooting of Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes because
the case is before the courts. |
LOS ANGELES, Sept.
12 (Xinhuanet) -- Officials in Los Angeles Monday urged
residents to remain calm in the wake of a widespread power
outage, just one day after a man believed to be affiliated
with al-Qaida vowed attacks against the city.
Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa asked residents to "remain
vigilant" and said there was no credible terrorist
threat against Los Angeles, despite the videotaped message
from an al-Qaida operative.
"We must remain vigilant," Villaraigosa said
at a news conference earlier in the afternoon. "There
have been no acts of terrorism committed by al-Qaida in
this country in the last four years, but we're all very
clear that it's within the realm of possibility."
Authorities discovered a videotaped message Sunday believed
to be from a former Southern California resident who is
now affiliated with al-Qaida.
"Yesterday, London and Madrid. Tomorrow, Los Angeles
and Melbourne, Allah willing," said the bespectacled
man identified as Adam Gadahn, who wore a black turban
and masked most of his face with a black scarf.
"And this time, don't count on us demonstrating
restraint or compassion," the man warned in the video.
In a separate development, city maintenance workers
accidentally cut a power line earlier in the day, sparking
a widespread electrical outage that affected half the
city, snarling traffic and trapping dozens of people in
elevators.
The power outage occurred soon after 12:30 p.m. local
time (0430 GMT), stalling businesses around the city and
prompting the closure of all of the city's public libraries.
Although there were no reports of any injuries associated
with the outage, the power was off long enough to clog
traffic at busy intersections suddenly left without traffic
control, police said.
A spokesman of the Los Angeles Fire Department said
firefighters responded to several dozen calls from stuck
elevators.
City utility officials and police quickly stressed that
the outage involved "no terrorism or foul play."
Mayor Villaraigosa said the outage was caused solely
by human error, though he recognized the timing of the
problem, after the videotape release and near the anniversary
of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, prompted some early concern.
The mayor said Los Angeles, the second biggest city
in the United States, remains a top terrorist target despite
the fact that there is no credible threat against it at
this time.
He said he and Los Angeles Police Department chief William
Bratton have requested more anti-terrorism funding from
state and federal officials.
Meanwhile, an official of the FBI's local office said
Monday that Los Angeles is safe for now, but urged residents
to be aware of their surroundings. |
WASHINGTON - Supreme Court nominee
John Roberts on Tuesday declined to discuss his views
on the landmark 1973 ruling on abortion but said the
concept of legal precedent is a "very important
consideration."
On the second day of his confirmation hearings, President
Bush's choice for the nation's 17th chief justice said
that as of 1992, when the Supreme Court ruled in Casey
v. Planned Parenthood, the high court has emphasized
the principles that had been settled for years.
"It's entitled to respect under those principles,"
Roberts said.
Moderate Republican Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania,
the Judiciary Committee chairman, immediately questioned
Roberts about the divisive issue of abortion.
"I think it is a jolt to the legal system when
you overturn precedent," Roberts said. "It
is not enough that you may think that a prior decision
was wrongly decided."
In his writings, Roberts has argued that the Roe v.
Wade decision by the high court had been wrongly decided.
The federal appeals judge declined to specifically
discuss the abortion rights case, saying that there
are abortion-related cases on the court's docket. The
next term begins Oct. 3. |
ILULISSAT, Greenland - The gargantuan
chunks of ice breaking off the Sermeq Kujalleq glacier
and thundering into an Arctic fjord make a spectacular
sight. But to Greenlanders it is also deeply worrisome.
The frequency and size of the icefalls are a powerful
reminder that the frozen sheet covering the world's
largest island is thinning - a glaring sign of global
warming, scientists say.
"In the past we could walk on the ice in the fjord
between the icebergs for a six-month period during the
winter, drill holes and fish," said Joern Kristensen,
a fisherman and one of the indigenous Inuit who are
most of Greenland's population of 56,000.
"We can only do that for a month or two now. It
has become more difficult to drive dog sleds because
the ice between the icebergs isn't solid anymore."
In 2002-2003, a six-mile-long stretch of the Sermeq
Kujalleq glacier broke off and drifted silently out
of the fjord near Ilulissat, Greenland's third largest
town, 155 miles north of the Arctic Circle.
Although Greenland, three times the
size of Texas, is the prime example, scientists say
the effects of climate change are noticeable throughout
the Arctic region, from the northward spread of spruce
beetles in Canada to melting permafrost in Alaska and
northern Russia.
Indigenous people, who for centuries have adapted their
lives to the cold, fear that even small and gradual
changes could have a profound impact.
"We can see a trend that the fall is getting longer
and wetter," said Lars-Anders Baer, a political
leader of Sweden's Sami, a once nomadic, reindeer-herding
people.
"If the climate gets warmer, it is probably bad
for the reindeer. New species (of plants) come in and
suffocate other plants that are the main food for the
reindeer," he said.
Rising temperatures are also a concern in the Yamalo-Nenets
region in Western Siberia, said Alexandr Navyukhov,
49. He is an ethnic Nenet, a group that lives mostly
off hunting, fishing and deer-breeding.
"We now have bream in our river,
which we didn't have in the past because that fish is
typical of warmer regions," he said. "On the
one hand it may look like good news, but bream are predatory
fish that prey upon fish eggs, often of rare kinds of
fish."
Melting permafrost has damaged hundreds
of buildings, railway lines, airport runways and gas
pipelines in Russia, according to the 2004 Arctic Climate
Impact Assessment commissioned by the Arctic Council,
an intergovernmental body.
Research also shows that populations of turbot, Atlantic
cod and snow crab are no longer found in some parts
of the Bering Sea, an important fishing zone between
Alaska and Russia, and that flooding along the Lena
River, one of Siberia's biggest, has increased with
warming temperatures.
In Greenland, Anthon Utuaq, a 68-year-old retired hunter,
worries that a warmer climate will make it harder for
his son to continue the family trade.
"Maybe it will be difficult for him to find the
seals," Utuaq said, resting on a bench in the east
coast town of Kulusuk. "They will head north to
colder places if it gets warmer."
Arctic sea ice has decreased by about 8 percent, or
more than 380,000 square miles, over the past 30 years.
In Sisimiut, Greenland's second largest
town, lakes have doubled in size in the last decade.
"Greenland was perceived as this huge solid place
that would never melt," said Robert Corell of the
American Meteorological Society, a Boston-based scientific
organization. "The evidence is now so strong that
the scientific community is convinced that global warming
is the cause."
How much of it is natural and how much is caused by
humans burning fossil fuels is sharply debated. Greenland
itself endured sharp climate shifts long before fossil
fuels were an issue, and sustained Norse settlements
for 400 years until the 15th century.
"We know that temperatures have gone up and it's
partly caused by man. But let's hold our horses because
it's not everywhere that the ice is melting. In the
Antarctic, only 1 percent is melting," said Bjoern
Lomborg, a Danish researcher and prominent naysayer
on the magnitude of the global-warming threat.
What is clear is that the average ocean temperature
off Greenland's west coast has risen in recent years
- from 38.3 degrees Fahrenheit to 40.6 F - and glaciers
have begun to retreat, said Carl Egede Boeggild, a glaciologist
with the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland,
a government agency.
The Sermilik glacier in southern Greenland has retreated
nearly seven miles, and the Sermeq Kujalleq glacier
near Ilulissat is also shrinking, said Henrik Hoejmark
Thomsen of the geological survey.
In 1967, satellite imagery measured
it moving 4.3 miles per year. In 2003, the rate was
8.1 miles.
"What exactly happened, we don't know. But it
appears to be the effect of climate change," said
Hoejmark Thomsen.
In August, the National Science Foundation's Arctic
System Science Committee issued a report saying the
rate of ice melting in the Arctic is increasing and
within a century could for the first time lead to summertime
ice-free ocean conditions.
With warmer temperatures, some bacteria, plants and
animals could disappear, while others will thrive. Polar
bears and other animals that depend on sea ice to breed
and forage are at risk, scientists say, and some species
could face extinction in a few decades.
The thinning of the sea ice presents a danger to both
humans and polar bears, said Peter Ewins, director of
Arctic conservation for the World Wildlife Fund Canada.
"The polar bears need to be there to catch enough
seals to see them through the summer in open warm water
systems. Equally, the Inuit need to be out there on
the ice catching seals and are less and less able to
do that because the ice is more unstable, thinner,"
he said.
When NASA started taking satellite images of the Arctic
region in the late 1970s and computer technology improved,
scientists noted alarming patterns and theorized that
the culprit was gases emitted by industries and internal
combustion engines to create a "greenhouse effect"
of trapping heat in the atmosphere.
Inuit leaders are trying to draw attention to the impact
of climate change and pollution.
"When I was a child, the weather used to be more
stable. It worries me to see and hear all this,"
Greenland Premier Hans Enoksen said on the sidelines
of a meeting of environmental officials from 23 countries
in Ilulissat. The meeting ended
with statements of concern - and no action.
The Kyoto Protocol that took effect in February aims
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But
the 140 nations that have signed the pact don't include
the United States, which produces one-quarter of the
gases.
The Bush administration says
participation would severely damage the U.S. economy.
Many scientists say that position undermines the whole
planet and they point to Greenland as the leading edge
of what the globe could suffer.
"Greenland is the canary
in a mine shaft alerting us," said Corell,
the American meteorologist, standing on the edge of
the Sermeq Kujalleq glacier which he is studying. "In
the U.S., global warming is a tomorrow issue. ... For
us working here, it hits you like a ton of bricks when
you see it." |
Chinese Vice President Zeng Qinghong
was all smiles at the grand opening of the new Hong
Kong Disneyland offering the central government's official
blessing.
Against the fairytale backdrop of Sleeping Beauty's
Castle, the Communist Party official and guest of honor
stood Monday alongside Disney executives Michael Eisner
and Bob Iger to cut the red ribbon officially opening
the $3 billion theme park.
Also present at the ribbon-cutting was Hong Kong Chief
Executive Donald Tsang, representing the park's main
investor, the Hong Kong government. With a 57 percent
stake in Disneyland, the government is counting on the
park's magic to lure 5 million tourists to Hong Kong
within a year, and double that number by 2020.
The park is projected to earn $19 billion over 40 years.
If the Chinese like it, that is. Most of the tourists
are expected to come from mainland China, where people's
exposure to Disney films and characters has been limited.
The park incorporates feng shui principles into its
design and serves mostly Chinese food, in an effort
to please local temperament and tastes.
Monday's ceremony featured a lion dance accompanied
by Chinese drums and cymbals and speeches in three languages
-- Mandarin, English and Cantonese -- as well as Disney
characters and songs.
China's vice president seemed pleased. That could be
important to Iger, who takes over as Disney's CEO on
Sept. 30. If all goes well, Disney hopes to expand the
Hong Kong theme park, currently the world's smallest.
If all goes very well, there will be movies and merchandise
to sell in China, and discussions on opening another
theme park in Shanghai in a few years.
It could all lead to a dream come true ... but elsewhere
in Hong Kong, a more complex subplot was playing out.
Officiating at the Disneyland opening was the ostensible
reason for Zeng's three-day visit to Hong Kong, his
first since being appointed in 2003 to oversee the territory's
affairs. He took advantage of the opportunity, however,
to launch one of the central government's trademark
charm offensives at the ever-susceptible people of Hong
Kong.
Over the weekend, Zeng visited a popular racecourse,
inspected facilities for the 2008 Olympics equestrian
events to be held in Hong Kong, and had a friendly chat
with Jockey Club executives. He visited a nursing home
and had a friendly cup of tea with a local family in
their home, events that were broadcast on local TV stations.
In his shirtsleeves, Zeng appeared relaxed and smiling.
He made time to visit with local tycoons, financial
and business leaders, but declined to meet local legislators,
who had been hoping for their first genuine discussion
with a central government official.
In a style typical of Chinese leaders, he also seemed
to be doing most of the talking at his planned stops
around the city.
That was fine with the business leaders -- what he
had to say was music to their ears. Beijing would continue
to support them and offer them opportunities to be part
of China's ongoing economic boom.
But local legislators, particularly the democrats,
were disappointed. Despite saying he wanted to listen
to local views, Zeng kept them at a distance and avoided
any political dialogue with the city's elected representatives.
He invited all 60 legislators to join a dinner for
some 400 guests Sunday night, in what was seen as a
small, but positive, first step. It was the first time
democrats were included in an invitation from a top
Chinese leader.
In his banquet speech, Zeng called on the people of
Hong Kong to speed up the city's development and to
seek harmony and the common good with a generous mind.
Unfortunately, in an action Zeng may have viewed as
lacking generosity and disturbing harmony, the democrats
had already asked Tsang to deliver a letter to Zeng
calling on the central government to retract its decision
against universal suffrage for Hong Kong in 2007, review
its position on the June 4, 1989, crackdown in Tiananmen
Square and release detained Hong Kong journalist Ching
Cheong.
One lone voice refused to be silenced. Veteran protester-turned-legislator
Leung Kwok-hung, known as Long Hair for his uncut tresses,
shouted his demands on democracy and June 4 inside the
banquet hall, resulting in his speedy removal.
Just before Zeng's visit, Tsang had announced that
he had obtained permission for all 60 legislators to
visit the southern province of Guangdong later this
month on a fact-finding tour that would include meetings
with provincial leaders. This was a breakthrough, as
the invitation included democrats who had been denied
entry to mainland China since 1989 for their activities
opposing the crackdown on student demonstrators in Beijing.
Most democrats have decided it's best to politely accept
such carrots as the dinner and the Guangdong trip, to
build trust with Chinese officials at whatever level
they can, and look for opportunities for genuine exchanges
over time. By taking the opposite, confrontational approach,
Long Hair is testing the limits of official patience.
It remains to be seen whether he will still be included
in the mainland trip. As to whether the real concerns
of the democrats will be addressed by Chinese officials
anytime soon, that remains their hope.
It may prove as much of a fantasy as the Magic Kingdom.
On the other hand, the story of Beijing, Disney and
the Democrats, like a fairytale woven with trials and
tribulations, may -- eventually -- turn out to have
a happy ending. |
OTTAWA — Paul
Hellyer, onetime cabinet minister and a political chameleon
who went through Liberal and Tory colours before founding
two political parties of his own, has a new cause —
UFOs.
Hellyer is to be a featured speaker at a UFO conference
in Toronto later this month, and organizers are making
much of his credentials as a former defence minister in
the Pearson administration 40 years ago.
Skeptics are, well, skeptical.
The 82-year-old Hellyer says he believes not only that
UFOs are extraterrestrial visitors, but that some governments
— the United States at least — know all about
it and are covering up. He says he believes American scientists
have re-engineered alien wreckage from a supposed UFO
crash at Roswell, N.M. in 1947 to produce modern technical
marvels.
‘‘I believe that UFOs are real,’’
he said in a recent interview. ‘‘I’ll
talk about that a little bit and a bit about the fantastic
coverup of the United States government and also a little
bit of the fallout from the wreckage, by that I mean the
material discoveries we have made and how they’ve
been applied to our technology.’’
Hellyer was once a political star. He was first elected
to the Commons in 1949 at the age of 25, at that time
the youngest person ever to win a seat.
He went on to become a cabinet minister, ran for the
Liberal leadership against Pierre Trudeau, switched parties
to the Conservatives and ran for that party’s leadership,
too. He eventually founded two other political parties,
Action Canada in 1971 and the Canadian Action party in
1997.
He says his conviction that UFOs are real arose from
reading in recent years, not from anything gleaned from
secret archives during his time in office.
Organizers of the MUFON conference — the name is
an acronym for the Mutual UFO Network — see Hellyer’s
participation as giving legitimacy to the cause. The conference
is billed as ‘‘Canada’s first major
UFO symposium calling for complete government disclosure
concerning the reality of UFOs and the extraterrestrial
presence on Earth.’’
Victor Viggiani, a retired educator who is an organizer
of the event, calls him a featured speaker.
‘‘We’re depending on him to be a real
focal point. We’re using his sort of experiences
to demonstrate that national political figures can come
out and talk about this.’’
He says Hellyer has a simple point to make: ‘‘Let’s
start telling the truth about what we all know is really
happening in the skies and journalists start paying attention,
that’s basically going to be his message.’’
His participation is exasperating for David Gower, a
spokesman for Skeptics Canada, a group dedicated to rational
thinking and to debunking paranormal claims. Gower said
UFO enthusiasts have a quasi-religious fervour that often
makes them impervious to doubt.
‘‘There is a deep-seated need, a desire in
people, to feel that there’s something in control
somewhere, bigger than they are, something that can give
some kinds of answers.’’ |
For
the first time, the Signs Team's most popular and discerning
essays have been compiled into book form and thematically
organized.
These books contain hard hitting exposés into
human nature, propaganda, psyop activities and insights
into the world events that shape our future and our
understanding of the world.
The six new books, available now at our bookstore,
are entitled:
- 911 Conspiracy
- The Human Condition
- The Media
- Religion
- The Work
- U.S. Freedom
Read
them today - before the book burning starts! |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|