|
"You get America out of Iraq and
Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism."
- Cindy Sheehan
|
P I C T U R E
O F T H E D A Y
For
the first time, the Signs Team's most popular and discerning
essays have been compiled into book form and thematically
organized.
These books contain hard hitting exposés into
human nature, propaganda, psyop activities and insights
into the world events that shape our future and our
understanding of the world.
The six new books, available now at our bookstore,
are entitled:
- 911 Conspiracy
- The Human Condition
- The Media
- Religion
- The Work
- U.S. Freedom
Read
them today - before the book burning starts! |
August must be a troubled
time for Mr. Bush. He's got that madwoman Cindy Sheehan
on his doorstep, and his approval ratings for the war
on Iraq have tanked. The last time he was in the soup
like this, the first summer he took August off, he needed
September 11 to transform him from a bumbling frat prankster
into "the Commander-in-Chief". He must be hoping
that Karl Rove and the backroom boys can do it again.
Yet after four years of increasing paranoia and talk
of Homeland Security, not to forget last year's campaign
based upon "you're safer with George 'cause if John
Kerry's elected, al Qaeda will be attacking us at home",
it seems he can't stage another attack on "America"
without demonstrating that all the security measures in
the world aren't going to stop an attack if the culprits
are also the guards.
But before going too far in this reverie, a thought arises,
an old joke that goes back to the sixties: "LBJ told
us that if we voted for Goldwater, we'd have a war in
Vietnam. I voted for Goldwater anyway, and, sure enough,
we got into a war in Vietnam."
We know the president is so busy keeping the USA safe
from terrorism that he doesn't have the time to meet with
Cindy Sheehan. The corollary of this certifiable fact
is that if those darned terrorists do manage to strike
inside of Fortress USA, that'll be proof positive that
the president was stymied in his desire to make the USA
a terrorist free zone by those traitorous liberal scum
who refused to take the threat seriously, in spite of
Bush's spending of his hard-stolen, post-election, political
capital in a magnanimous effort to convince the extreme-leftist
liberals that Bush was right all along and that they should
adopt his neo-Christian, theocratic view of the benefits
of unleashing the Apocalypse.
And enough Americans may buy it to look the other way
when the 5 am visitors come calling with offers of long-term
vacations for those who haven't understood that the Commander-in-Chief
is divinely inspired.
Which makes Pat Robertson's labeling of Hugo Chavez a
"dictator" something of a joke, although a very
serious one, because for all of Robertson's "I've
been misunderstood" and "I apologise",
he never said he was sorry for painting the duly-elected,
and reconfirmed by referendum, president of Venezuela,
who was still abiding by his country's constitution as
of this afternoon, as a tyrant. But in the topsy-turvy
world of Bush-speak, democracy means ignoring the constitution
and rigging the elections and tyranny means allowing the
great unwashed some say in their governance. Bush has
long since thrown out the US Constitution as the basis
of the rule of government in the US, and the US is in
the process of writing another bogus constitution for
their splintered fiefdom that was once Iraq.
For many years we have been pointing to the crimes of
the neo-cons, both American and Israeli, in organising
the attacks of 9/11 in order to justify their agenda of
death and destruction and depopulation -- for that is
what it really is, and all this talk about going into
Iraq for oil doesn't get to the heart of the issue. "Peak
Oil" is the politically acceptable way to broach
the idea of culling the herd, of killing off 2/3rds of
the world's population so that the elite can have some
leg room to stomp on the few serfs they permit to continue
living on their land.
The madmen in power in the US and Israel were counting
on both the credulity and the incredulity of the American
people in the face of such an emormous crime: credulous
in believing the official story that such a massive attack
could be organised by a guy in a cave and brought off
with only box cutters, including taking out the entire
North American Air Defense system for the day; incredulous
towards all the evidence that points to the real culprits
being in the halls of power in Washington and Tel Aviv.
And four years later look at the mess we're in. We, and
others, have been predicting it for a long time, and if
our research is correct, you ain't seen nothin' yet!
Finally, the other "F" word is being whispered
aloud, even if softly and probably too late to do anything
about it. As we live in a non-linear world, we don't completely
discount the possibility that the situation could improve,
but in the words of Bob Dylan, it's not dark yet, but
it's getting there.
Which gives us the opportunity to leave you with this
joke we found at Guillemette:
How many members of the Bush government does it
take to change a lightbulb?
"Ten.
"1. One to deny that a light bulb needs to be
changed;
"2. One to attack the patriotism of anyone who
says the light bulb needs to be changed;
"3. One to blame Clinton for burning out the light
bulb;
"4. One to tell the nations of the world that
they are either for changing the light bulb or for eternal
darkness;
"5. One to give a billion dollar no-bid contract
to Halliburton for the new light bulb;
"6. One to arrange a photograph of Bush, dressed
as a janitor, standing on a step ladder under the banner
'Bulb Accomplished';
"7. One administration insider to resign and in
detail reveal how Bush was literally 'in the dark' the
whole time;
"8. One to viciously smear No. 7;
"9. One surrogate to campaign on TV and at rallies
on how George Bush has had a strong light-bulb-changing
policy all along;
"10. And finally, one to confuse Americans about
the difference between screwing a light bulb and screwing
the country."
|
US President George
W Bush has interrupted his summer holiday for the second
time this week to publicly defend his war on terror.
The US was engaged in a global war that affected the
safety and security of every US citizen, he said in Idaho.
America would not wait to be attacked again - like on
11 September - he said.
Mr Bush rejected calls by anti-war protesters for a withdrawal
from Iraq, and vowed that the US would "stay, fight
and win the war on terror".
"An
immediate withdrawal of our troops in Iraq or the broader
Middle East, as some have called for, would only embolden
the terrorists and create a staging ground to launch more
attacks against America and free nations,"
he told an audience that included families of servicemen
and women serving in Iraq.
Race on for Bush in Iraq
"We will complete the work in Afghanistan and Iraq,"
he said.
Mr Bush said terrorists had converged on Iraq from abroad,
but the US would not allow the Middle East to become a
safe haven for terrorists from which they could plan attacks
on democracies.
The Pentagon has announced that it is sending an extra
1,500 troops to Iraq to support security efforts during
upcoming elections.
The troops are expected to be deployed before a referendum
on a new constitution due in October and to stay for about
four months - including the period after general elections
envisaged in December.
"So long as I'm the President, we will stay,
we will fight and we will win the war on terror"
George W Bush
|
"These troops will join 180,000 Iraqi security forces
and 138,000 coalition forces in helping set the security
conditions for successful elections," the Pentagon
announcement said.
The new deployment is not significant strategically,
says the BBC's Adam Brookes in Washington.
But it is a sign that US troops are not about to begin
withdrawing, our correspondent says.
Signs of splits
Mr Bush's speech, another he gave on Monday and appearances
by senior administration officials in recent days have
all been aimed at batting away emerging challenges to
the way that Mr Bush is managing the war in Iraq, he says.
Opinion polls suggest more than 50% of Americans think
Iraq is going badly.
Most also believe some or all US troops should be withdrawn
from Iraq, according to the polls.
Meanwhile the US anti-war movement has been reinvigorated
by Cindy Sheehan, the mother of a US soldier killed in
Iraq.
Ms Sheehan's supporters have been camped outside the
president's ranch at Crawford, Texas.
And in a sign of splits emerging within Mr Bush's party,
a senior Republican senator, Chuck Hagel, has said publicly
that the war in Iraq is starting to look like that in
Vietnam. |
BEIJING, Aug. 25 --
Parents of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq plan to follow
President George W. Bush around the country in the coming
months after camping out at his Crawford ranch in Texas.
Anti-war groups kept the pressure on Bush this week
as he made speeches in Utah and Idaho, where he promised
that US forces would remain in Iraq to complete their
job to honour those who already died there.
Amid growing public skepticism on the Iraq war, US President
George W. Bush vowed on Wednesday to"stay on the
course" on the anti-terrorism war as long as he is
president.
"So long as I am president we will stay, we will
fight and we will win the war on terrorism," Bush
said in a speech in Nampa, Idaho, to members of the Idaho
National Guard and their families.
"We'll complete our work in Afghanistan and Iraq,"
Bush said in his speech in Idaho.
A majority of the Americans, however, doubt the country
will win the war in Iraq, according to a July 27 USA Today/CNN/Gallup
Poll.
It was also the first poll that showed
more than half of Americans - 51 per cent - believed the
Bush administration was deliberately misleading the public
when it asserted that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.
|
NEW YORK - Parents of soldiers
killed in Iraq plan to follow President George W. Bush
around the country in the coming months, hoping to generate
nationwide anti-war sentiment after camping out at his
Texas ranch.
Through much of August, Cindy Sheehan, who lost her
son in Iraq, has stationed herself with other protesters
outside Bush's Crawford ranch, garnering international
media coverage at a time when more than 1,800 U.S. military
have died in the Iraq conflict.
Sue Niederer, who with Sheehan and other families of
dead soldiers founded "Gold Star Families for Peace,"
on Wednesday vowed to pursue the president with her
anti-war message.
"We are going to be continuously
on Mr. Bush and make him understand we are not going
away. We are very, very steadfast in what we doing,"
said the 56-year-old housewife, real estate agent and
substitute teacher from Hopewell, New Jersey.
Niederer, whose 24-year-old son Seth Dvorin died in
Iskandariya, Iraq, on February 3, 2004, said she and
others plan to travel to wherever Bush will be speaking.
Anti-war groups kept the pressure on the president
this week as he made speeches in Utah and Idaho, where
he promised that U.S. troops would remain in Iraq to
complete their job to honor those who already died there
-- a logic Niederer disputed.
"You are dishonoring the soldiers, you are not
honoring them," she said of Bush's speech.
"Given the reasons for why we
went into this war, why have their deaths not been in
vain?" she asked, referring to Bush's now disproved
pre-war assertion in 2003 that Iraq might have stockpiles
of weapons of mass destruction.
Sheehan, the Vacaville, California, mother whose son
Casey was killed in combat in Iraq, has become the center
of the anti-war effort by camping out near Bush's ranch
and demanding to meet face-to-face with the president.
She plans to speak in Brunswick, Maine, in September
and in Brooklyn, New York, in October.
After Bush ends his Crawford stay at the end of August,
the anti-war families are also
considering crisscrossing America in buses in hopes
of building a national protest movement similar to that
seen during the Vietnam War, when public sentiment against
the war contributed to the eventual U.S. withdrawal.
"This is Vietnam No. 2. As we
are seeing in the polls, the American people are beginning
to realize this war was created on lies, deceit and
deception," Niederer said.
A majority of the U.S. public doubts the United States
will win the war in Iraq and believes the Bush administration
deliberately misled Americans over Iraq's weapons capabilities,
according to a July 27 USA Today/CNN/Gallup Poll.
It was the first poll to find that more than half of
Americans -- 51 percent -- believed the administration
was deliberately misleading when it asserted that Iraq
had weapons of mass destruction.
But creating a Vietnam-style nationwide protest against
the Iraq conflict will be near impossible without a
draft to focus dissent, said Stanford University Political
Science Professor and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
Morris Fiorina.
"If you had a draft, you would
affect everybody and break beyond the usual protesters,"
Fiorina said. |
NAMPA, United States - US President
George W. Bush contrasted a military mother whose five
sons and husband have served in Iraq with anti-war protestors
he said risked emboldening terrorists.
"There are few things in life
more difficult than seeing a loved one go off to war.
Here, in Idaho, a mom named Tammy Pruett ... knows that
feeling six times over," the president said in
a speech to citizen soldiers here.
His salute to Pruett was a clear response to anti-war
protestor Cindy Sheehan, who has besieged the president
at his Texas ranch and demanded a meeting with him to
discuss the death of her soldier son in Iraq.
Bush, who was to meet with relatives
of troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan after his
speech, has increasingly criticized Sheehan as unrepresentative
of most military families he meets.
Bush said Pruett has four sons serving in the Idaho
National Guard in Iraq, and that her husband and another
son came home from Iraq in 2004 after helping to train
firefighters in the city of Mosul.
The president quoted her as saying "'I know that
if something happens to one of the boys, they would
leave this world doing what they believe, what they
believe is right for our country. And I guess you couldn't
ask for a better way of life than giving it for something
you believe in.'"
"America lives in freedom
because of families like the Pruetts," said
Bush, who faced slumping approval ratings and polls
showing that a majority of the US public thinks the
war in Iraq was a mistake.
Democratic Senator Edward Kennedy said in reaction
to Bush's speech, that more than "photo-ops and
spin" are needed to win the Iraq war.
"(Bush) needs to realize what most Americans now
understand that staying the course is not an option."
Bush, who was to return to his ranch
later in the day, also repeated his attack on anti-war
protestors as dangerous isolationists, and said they
advocated policies that would embolden terrorists.
"An immediate withdrawal of our troops in Iraq
or the broader Middle East, as some have called for,
would only embolden the terrorists and create a staging
ground to launch more attacks against America and free
nations," he told an audience mostly made up of
Idaho National Guard members.
"So long as I'm the president, we will stay, we
will fight, and we will win the war on terror,"
said Bush, who announced that global campaign after
the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
It was not clear how many protestors, if any, want
the United States to retreat from the Middle East entirely.
Bush also urged Americans to be patient as Iraqis vie
to draft a new constitution.
"The establishment of a democratic constitution
will be a landmark event in the history of Iraq and
the history of the history of the Middle East. It will
bring us closer to a day when Iraq is a nation that
can govern itself, sustain itself, and defend itself,"
Bush said.
He compared the process to the difficult meetings in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1787 that resulted in
the US Constitution.
"Producing
a constitution is a difficult process. It involves a
lot of debate and compromise. We know that from our
own history," Bush said.
"Iraqis are now at the beginning of a long process,
and like our founders, they're grappling with difficult
issues, such as the role of the federal government,"
he said.
"They're arguing about the proper place of religion
in the life of their nation. And like our founders,
they will come up with a system that respects the traditions
of their country and guarantees the rights of all their
citizens," Bush said.
"But what's important is that
the Iraqis are resolving these issues through debate
and discussion, not at the barrel of a gun."
The process earlier got a boost when the Kurdish parliament
accepted the draft constitution. That move is expected
to pave the way for Iraq's 275-member parliament to
approve the draft Thursday, because Kurds and the majority
Shiites together hold about 210 seats.
In Baghdad meanwhile discussions continued to persuade
Sunni Arabs to accept the draft.
Bush's speech came shortly after Sheehan said she was
resuming her vigil outside the president's ranch near
tiny Crawford, Texas. She has met once before with Bush
shortly after her son Casey was killed in Iraq in 2004.
"I'm coming back to Crawford for my son. As long
as the president, who sent him to die in a senseless
war, is in Crawford, that is where I belong," Sheehan
wrote in an essay published on the website The Huffington
Post. [...]
As fresh violence raged across Iraq
Wednesday, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld ordered
1,500 more US troops to the country to beef up security
for the planned elections. |
DENVER - Despite camping
out next to George W Bush's Texas ranch for two weeks,
Cindy Sheehan has been unable to get a meeting with the
president for an explanation of why her 24-year-old son
had to die in action. So, here is some of the story from
one who was there.
Like Army Specialist Casey Sheehan, I was in Baghdad's
Sadr City on April 4, 2004. I was there as an unembedded
journalist (not attached to a military unit). Unlike Casey
Sheehan, I came out alive.
I had traveled to Sadr City to cover the Bush administration's
attack on the movement of Shi'ite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.
It didn't matter that the cleric had millions of followers
or that he was the scion of an important political family
with a history of standing up to tyranny. (His father
was killed by Saddam Hussein's regime for fomenting revolution
in 1999. His uncle, Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Baqir al-Sadr,
was killed for leading an insurrection against Saddam's
Ba'ath rule in 1980.)
It didn't matter that Sadr's forces
were providing food aid to the poor or organizing traffic
patrol and garbage duty in an atmosphere with no basic
services. The problem for Bush and his Iraq administrator,
L Paul Bremer, was that Sadr was against the US occupation.
So he had to be dealt with. First his newspaper
was closed. (See The Shi'ite voice that will be heard,
Asia Times Online, April 8, 2004)Then his top advisor
was arrested. Then Bremer announced an unnamed judge was
demanding that Sadr be arrested on charges of murder.
"He's effectively attempting to establish his authority
in place of the legitimate Iraqi government," Bremer
told reporters. "We will not tolerate that."
That was the last straw. Until April 4, 2004 Muqtada
had urged his followers to protest peacefully against
the occupation. But the US assault led him to urge his
followers to "terrorize the enemy". In the first
48 hours of fighting, Sadr's followers seized police stations
and government buildings across the country, including
the governor's office in Basra.
At least 75 Iraqis and 10 US servicemen were killed,
among them Army Specialist Casey Sheehan. As an unembedded
journalist, I saw only the Iraqi casualties (the US casualties
being taken away to military hospitals). My translator
Waseem and I weaved through roads closed by US tanks until
we arrived at Sadr City's al-Ubaidi Hospital.
There, I interviewed 15-year-old Ali
Hussein. He lay in the hospital, a US bullet lodged in
his gut. He was barely able to lift his head, but he wanted
to say a few words to the Western reporter: "I was
standing in my doorway and I was shot," he said.
"I don't have anything to say to the Americans. It's
just between them and God."
A few miles away at Baghdad's Mustansuriye University,
hundreds of students marched through the center of campus.
They chanted, "The dead want a brave people so we
won't follow the law of Bremer."
"We will act according to the situation that we
face," said Wassam Mehdi Hussein, head of the Islamic
Union of Iraqi Students, standing by Muqtada's declaration
of jihad against the occupation. "We will use any
means peaceful and violent."
Another Mustansuriye student, Ali Mohammed,
noted the violence started when the US military closed
Sadr's newspaper and arrested his top advisor. "We
don't want to fight the Americans," he told me. "We
are very grateful to them. They are very dear to us because
they released us from Saddam. But at the same time we
want them to do something for humanity.
"A lot of people are suffering
from hunger and sitting at home having no work. These
things make the situation bad and then we turn to explosions.
We want to respect them and we want them to respect us."
A year on, such respect still isn't forthcoming - even
to US citizens like Cindy Sheehan, who deserve to know
the truth of why their sons have been killed in Iraq.
It isn't for lack of trying that Sheehan isn't getting
answers from Bush.
She has stubbornly maintained her vigil outside Bush's
ranch in Crawford, Texas, demanding a meeting with the
president. Since no weapons of mass destruction - which
Bush used as grounds to go into Iraq - have been found
there, she thinks Bush owes her an explanation.
Her protest has become a lightning rod for antiwar sentiment,
with more than 1,000 vigils organized across the US this
week in support of her demand.
Bush has largely ignored Sheehan's protest.
When asked last week about Sheehan's demand for a meeting,
Bush refused to answer directly: "And so, you know,
listen, I sympathize with Mrs Sheehan. She feels strongly
about her - about her position. And I am - she has every
right in the world to say what she believes. This is America."
Meanwhile, Associated Press reported that Bush was to
spend two hours on Wednesday with families of soldiers
killed in Iraq, but the meeting wasn't to include Cindy
Sheehan. Bush said Tuesday he understood her anguish,
but he also challenged her, saying the California woman's
demands for an immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq
was not embraced by many military families and represented
a view contrary to the national interest, AP reported.
|
NEW YORK The
American Legion, which has 2.7 million members, has declared
war on antiwar protestors, and the media could be next.
Speaking at its national convention in Honolulu, the group's
national commander called for an end to all “public
protests” and “media events” against
the war, even though they are protected by the Bill of
Rights.
"The American Legion will stand against anyone and
any group that would demoralize our troops, or worse,
endanger their lives by encouraging terrorists to continue
their cowardly attacks against freedom-loving peoples,"
Thomas Cadmus, national commander, told delegates at the
group's national convention in Honolulu.
The delegates voted to use whatever means
necessary to "ensure the united backing of the American
people to support our troops and the global war on terrorism."
In his speech, Cadmus declared: "It would be tragic
if the freedoms our veterans fought so valiantly to protect
would be used against their successors today as they battle
terrorists bent on our destruction.”
He explained, "No one respects the
right to protest more than one who has fought for it,
but we hope that Americans will present their views in
correspondence to their elected officials rather than
by public media events guaranteed to be picked up and
used as tools of encouragement by our enemies." This
might suggest to some, however, that American freedoms
are worth dying for but not exercising.
Without mentioning any current protestor, such as Cindy
Sheehan, by name, Cadmus recalled: "For many of us,
the visions of Jane Fonda glibly spouting anti-American
messages with the North Vietnamese and protestors denouncing
our own forces four decades ago is forever etched in our
memories. We must never let that happen again….
"We had hoped that the lessons learned
from the Vietnam War would be clear to our fellow citizens.
Public protests against the war here at home while our
young men and women are in harm's way on the other side
of the globe only provide aid and comfort to our enemies."
Resolution 3, which was passed unanimously by 4,000 delegates
to the annual event, states: "The American Legion
fully supports the president of the United States, the
United States Congress and the men, women and leadership
of our armed forces as they are engaged in the global
war on terrorism and the troops who are engaged in protecting
our values and way of life."
Cadmus advised: "Let's not repeat the mistakes of
our past. I urge all Americans to rally around our armed
forces and remember our fellow Americans who were viciously
murdered on Sept. 11, 2001." |
From Left
I on the News, I was referred to Billmon,
who referred to a passage in an article
in the Washington Post:
"Negotiators here described American officials
as playing a major role in the draft. U.S. Ambassador
Zalmay Khalilzad shuttled among Iraqi leaders, pushing
late Monday for the inclusion of Sunnis in talks, negotiators
said. U.S. Embassy staff members worked from a Kurdish
party headquarters to help type up the draft and translate
changes from English to Arabic for Iraqi lawmakers,
negotiators said."
A major role indeed. The U. S. Embassy is working from
Kurdish party headquarters to translate changes from English
to Arabic for Iraqi lawmakers. So the Americans are writing
the constitution in English, and then helpfully sending
out - symbolically from Kurdish party headquarters - the
drafts translated so the Iraqi lawmakers can see what
the U. S. has planned for their constitution. By controlling
the language in which the document is drafted, the Americans
can control the terms of the debate, and ensure that the
various factions can never come to a meeting of the minds
in the kind of compromises that might lead to a workable
document. Yet the spin on all this is how embarrassing
it is for the Bush Administration that the constitution
contains all these Shi'ite-influenced references to the
dominance of Islam in the laws of the new state. Isn't
it obvious that all this religion is being planted by
the Americans in order to ensure that the Sunnis and religious
moderates won't be able to live with the constitution
imposed on them, thus leading to the break-up of Iraq
and the formation of the new Shi'ite Empire? |
U.S. right-wing religious
broadcaster Pat Robertson apologized Wednesday for calling
for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.
The apology -- from the Christian Broadcasting Network
in Virgina Beach, Va, -- came only hours after Robertson
denied saying Chavez should be killed.
Robertson's apology is on the Christian Broadcasting
Network web site.
"Is it right to call for assassination? No, and
I apologize for that statement. I
spoke in frustration that we should accommodate the man
who thinks the U.S. is out to kill him."
Chavez, whose country is the world's fifth-largest oil
exporter, has emerged as one of the most outspoken critics
of President Bush.
He accuses the United States of conspiring to topple
his government and possibly backing plots to assassinate
him. U.S. officials have called the accusations ridiculous.
On Monday's telecast of his show "The 700 Club,"
Robertson had said of Chavez: "... if he thinks we're
trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought
to go ahead and do it. It's a whole lot cheaper than starting
a war, and I don't think any oil shipments will stop."
On Wednesday, Robertson initially denied having called
for Chavez to be killed and said The Associated Press
had misinterpreted his remarks.
On Tuesday, the State Department called Robertson's remarks
inappropriate. |
You know, when I was
growing up as a Catholic, I was given many differing views
of Jesus Christ. Virtually all of them were speculative,
of course, and as I grew older, I became aware that most
of them were based on the teacher's particular political
and cultural persuasion. The Pallotinian nuns that taught
me in the first and second grades were always telling
us horror stories about the communists in the Soviet Union
and China and had us pray for the souls of their children
every morning. The Jesuits I knew in high school provided
me and my fellow catechism students with a different view
of Jesus. Indeed, for most of these men Jesus was a revolutionary.
How much of his revolution was spiritual and how much
was social depended on their level of social and political
involvement. Being a very political person, I saw Jesus
as a revolutionary communist with a small "c."
Of course, there were a number of men with Roman collars
at the time who were taking this perception and turning
it into the basis for a social movement in many parts
of the world, especially in Latin America. Many of them
were Jesuits.
It is this tradition that Hugo Chavez of Venezuela recalls
in his speeches and social programs. It is also this tradition,
known today as liberation theology that the late pope
John Paul II attacked within months of his appointment
in 1978. John Paul II's opposition to this perception
of Jesus and his works were also part of the reason for
the demotion of the Jesuit order as the pope's protectors
and the ascension of the right wing Catholic organization
Opus Dei into that role. The new pope is even less sympathetic
to this train of thought. The underlying reason for this
vehement opposition to liberation theology among the Catholic
hierarchy stems from its alliances with nonreligious leftists
and its attacks on the Church's role as part of the oppressive
structure in the world of the peasantry. Nowhere is this
role greater than it is in Latin America.
Ever since Chavez began his popular upheaval in Venezuela
he has been under attack by the Catholic hierarchy in
that country. In fact, members of Opus Dei were involved
in the failed coup of 2000 and have been instrumental
in the CIA-funded opposition movement since the coup,
just as they were intimately involved in the murderous
CIA-sponsored coup in September 1973 in Chile. Last month,
Bishop Baltazar Porras, president of the Venezuelan bishops'
conference, said proponents of radical liberation theology
are using it to weaken and divide the Church. "This
is part of a plan to debilitate the Church," Porras
told The Associated Press in an interview last week. He
cited a recent forum in which the Church was accused of
turning her back on the poor, where Chavez garners most
of his political support. "This is a new program
led by a group of theologians like the ones in the times
of the Sandinista rule in Nicaragua with the same arguments,"
said Porras. "The argument is fundamentally anti-Catholic,
anti-hierarchy." (Catholic World New, 8/15/2005)
It is quite interesting to note Porras equating being
anti-hierarchy with being anti-Catholic. I wonder how
the Jesus who threw the moneychangers out of the temple
and challenged the Scribes and the Pharisees would feel
about that equation.
Now, in addition to having the Catholic hierarchy opposed
to him, Mr. Chavez has incurred the wrath of some in the
evangelical community. Given the generally political conservatism
of much of this community, this is not surprising. What
is surprising, however, is the vehemence of this wrath.
Pat Robertson, former US presidential candidate and head
of the multimillion-dollar Christian Broadcast Network,
called for Chavez's assassination in a broadcast Monday
night. Calling assassination " a whole lot cheaper
than starting a war" Robertson went on to say that
if Chavez were killed by US covert operatives he didn't
"think any oil shipments will stop."
Of course, for those who keep
their religion close to their heart or use it only when
necessary to cynically convince the public of the rightness
of their actions, the comments regarding oil must strike
a chord. After all, that's the underlying reason for Washington's
(and the old guard in Venezuela) opposition to Chavez
in the first place. Not only does he using Venezuelan
oil revenues to help the perennially poor in Venezuela,
he is also selling it to Cuba at cut rates and making
deals with China, much to the chagrin of Washington. Chavez
and his supporters understand this. In addition, they
also understand the Jesus who inspired Father Gutierrez
and his liberation theology. That was the Jesus who said:
"It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of
a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of
heaven."
Unfortunately, if Mr. Robertson and many others in Washington,
Caracas and the Vatican have their way, Hugo Chavez may
get his chance to enter that kingdom well before they
do. Although I still like to think that if there is a
heaven, Mr. Robertson and his ilk will be denied admission. |
Chávez
taunts US with oil offer
Venezuelan president hits back at assassination remarks
with offer of cheap petroleum for poor Americans |
Duncan Campbell
Thursday August 25, 2005
The Guardian |
President
Hugo Chávez of Venezuela hit back vigorously at
calls by an ally of President George Bush for his assassination
by offering cheap petrol to the poor of the US at a time
of soaring fuel prices.
In a typically robust response to remarks by the US televangelist
Pat Robertson, Mr Chávez compared his detractors
to the "rather mad dogs with rabies" from Cervantes'
Don Quixote, and unveiled his plans to use Venezuela's
energy reserves as a political tool.
"We want to sell gasoline and heating
fuel directly to poor communities in the United States,"
he said.
Mr Robertson's remarks have threatened to inflame tension
between the US and one of its main oil suppliers.
Yesterday the religious broadcaster apologised for his
remarks.
"Is it right to call for assassination? No, and
I apologise for that statement. I spoke in frustration
that we should accommodate the man who thinks the US is
out to kill him," he said.
In a TV broadcast on Monday, he said: "If he thinks
we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really
ought to go ahead and do it."
Yesterday Mr Robertson initially said his comments had
been misinterpreted, but went on to add that kidnapping
Mr Chávez might be a better idea.
"I said our special forces could take him out. Take
him out could be a number of things, including kidnapping."
The Bush administration tried to distance
itself from Mr Robertson's views without
upsetting the large Christian fundamentalist wing
which the veteran evangelist represents.
A State Department spokesman said assassination was not
part of government policy. "He's a private citizen,"
Donald Rumsfeld, the defence secretary, said of Mr Robertson.
"Private citizens say all kinds of things all the
time."
But Mr Robertson's remarks are seen as an embarrassment
at a time when the US is calling for a united front against
terror.
Democrats have challenged the Bush administration to
be more outspoken in its response to Mr Robertson's remarks
on the Christian Broadcasting Network.
Venezuela's ambassador to the US, Bernardo Alvarez, said:
"Mr Robertson has been one of this president's staunchest
allies. His statement demands the strongest condemnation
by the White House."
The Venezuelan government is asking for assurances from
the US government that Mr Chávez will be adequately
protected when he visits New York for a special session
of the UN next month.
Venezuela's vice-president, José Vicente Rangel,
said the possibility of legal action against Mr Robertson
for incitement to murder should also be considered.
Venezuela, the world's fifth largest crude exporter,
supplies 1.3m barrels of oil a day to the US. It remains
unclear how poor Americans might benefit from the cheap
petrol offer, but Mr Chávez has set up arrangements
with other countries for swapping services in exchange
for oil. Cuban doctors are working in the poorer areas
of Venezuela in exchange for cheap oil going to Cuba.
Jamaica yesterday became the first Caribbean
country to reach an agreement with Venezuela for oil at
below-market terms. The Petrocaribe initiative is a plan
to offer oil at flexible rates to 13 Caribbean countries.
Jamaica will pay $40 a barrel, against a market rate of
more than $60.
Mr Chávez said oil importers
such as the US could expect no respite from the oil market,
predicting the price of a barrel would reach $100 by 2012. |
There is something
not only rotten but seemingly deranged in the state of
mind of Republican leaders. I would call Pat Robertson
a Republican leader. He did well in a few Republican primaries
back in 1988 until scandal hit the whole Evangelical enterprise,
which Mr. Robertson assumed was a Bush Sr./Lee Atwater
conspiracy. It seemed convenient, he thought, that the
scandal hit just as he was hitting his stride.
Reverend Pat made peace and perhaps
a pact with the powers that be and currently has a direct
line to the White House. He, with Jerry Falwell, claims
to have helped make the double-barrel-two term Bush presidency
possible. On Monday the iconic
American Christian using the language of gangsters endorsed
the assassination of Hugo Chavez so we could save 200
billion dollars. The assumption was that the only two
alternatives to dealing with an elected leader who is
critical of the military industrial complex running our
country is to "take him out" or to wage a war.
He presents the options and then chooses the less expensive
one.
One does pause to wonder if he is not
a loose cannon but that the direct line to the White House
runs both ways. If in fact Venezuela and Iran are considering
an oil embargo against the US, this may not be a random
Christian perspective from the baby- faced aw-shucks father
figure for the consumers of sign-on-the-dotted-line religion.
Could this be a request from the top? Either Mr. Robertson
is truly out of his mind or he is "useful,"
a word that Rumsfeld loves to use. When asked about the
comment Rumsfeld referred to Robertson as a "private
citizen" and rather than condemn the comment he said,
"private citizens say all kinds of things all the
time. Next question."
How would this endorsement of assassination from the
giddy Evangelical be "useful" and to whom would
it be useful? Does a holy Christian man rattling a saber
make any sense to the essential logic of Christ? On the
subject of sabers, rattling or penetrating, Christ said,
if you live by the sword you die by the sword.
But here is the most amazing, confounding
thing Christ said - Love your enemy. This phrase means
nothing to the most boisterous Christians like Pat Robertson.
To them, this phrase is invisible. In their minds, it
is a soft, silly lapse in the Savior's prescription for
the salvation of the world. The Passion of Christ was
a bloody canvas for paranoid sadism. The prime actors
against Jesus, the alleged center of Pat Robertson's universe,
were soldiers taking orders from the likes of Mr. Robertson.
Pat Robertson sees an assassin and an army as legitimate
functionaries in realizing his view of a safe and decent
world.
We can certainly paraphrase the question standing before
the president in Crawford: "What noble cause did
my son die for?" What noble cause will be served
by Pat Robertson's Fatwa?
In December 2000 the incoming administration declared
Hugo Chavez a threat because he was selling oil to Cuba.
And now, if Venezuela is going to block the sale of their
nationalized oil to the U.S. what does that mean to a
Christian leader? Does he have investments he's worried
about? Does he believe Venezuela will be a conduit for
terrorism and communism and anti-Christian principles?
Does he want to make that case or would he prefer that
his government "off" an elected leader who just
happens to urge OPEC convert officially the standard of
buying oil from the dollar to the Euro?
Hugo Chavez speaks at length to his people over the TV
- and he reads to them. One of his favorite authors to
read to his people is Walt Whitman. At the Youth Conference
in Caracas earlier this month he called the people of
the U.S. “brothers” to Venezuela. He embraced
the traditions of Walt Whitman and Dr. Martin Luther King
Jr. and gave them as examples of the progressive history
of the U.S. Walt Whitman understood spirit and America.
Pat Robertson contradicts both.
One would think the FCC, under some aspect of the Patriot
Act might revoke Robertson's license to broadcast. If
he's out of his mind they might - if he's in the loop
- they won't. Stay tuned. |
A
senior US military officer yesterday predicted that al-Qaida
fighters in Iraq will move to the "vast ungoverned
spaces" of the Horn of Africa once conditions in
the country get too tough for them.
The warning came from Major General Douglas Lute, director
of operations at the US' central command. "There
will come a time when Zarqawi will face too much resistance
in Iraq and will move on," he predicted, referring
to the head of al-Qaida in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi,
the Jordanian-born Islamist who has claimed responsibility
for numerous attacks, kidnappings and beheadings.
Looking ahead to a time when he said
Iraq would be "stabilised", Gen Lute predicted
that Zarqawi would take the "path of least resistance"
and leave for such countries as Sudan, Ethiopia and Somalia.
But before that, he suggested, Zarqawi would make a show
of force in the run-up to the Iraqi constitutional referendum
and subsequent elections. "He has to go down fighting,"
he said.
Gen Lute said 90% of what he called the "enemy"
in Iraq was domestic. There was only a "slither"
of foreign fighters "sponsored from outside".
He declined to put a figure on his estimate. Earlier
this year, the London-based International Institute for
Strategic Studies said there were between 12,000 and 20,000
hardcore insurgents in Iraq.
In Iraq yesterday, insurgents armed with rocket-propelled
grenades and assault rifles attacked police checkpoints
in western Baghdad in some of the heaviest street fighting
in the capital for months.
Explosions shook the Hay al-Jamia district and at least
six police vehicles were set ablaze as about 40 insurgents,
some with faces masked, launched a daylight assault, witnesses
told Reuters. A police source said 13 people had been
killed and 31 wounded.
Last night 21 Iraqi MPs and three senior government officials
allied with the Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr refused to
carry out their duties after fighting broke out between
rival Shia militias. At least eight people were killed
and dozens wounded in street battles in Najaf and Baghdad
between members of the pro-government Badr organisation
and supporters of Sadr.
Gen Lute said in London yesterday that the dependency
of Iraqi security forces on foreign, notably US, troops
had to be broken. "Ultimately, the solution has got
to be a local solution, not one imposed from outside."
But he refused to be drawn on a timetable
for a reduction in US forces - now about 138,000 - in
Iraq. He said only that if the training of Iraqi forces
continued at its present rate by this time next year the
US would be "in a position to make adjustments".
He said the US would not "leave a vacuum" in
Iraq and would continue to deploy 10-man "coalition
assistant teams" to provide air support, artillery
and medical evacuation for Iraqi forces. The
US suffered from an intelligence gap, however, and had
to rely on Iraqis to tell the difference, for example,
between people from different Arab countries, and between
Iraqi Sunnis, Shias and Kurds.
Britain will be under heavy pressure to cut back its
forces in southern Iraq, now numbering about 9,000, before
it takes over control of Nato forces in Afghanistan in
April next year. Britain will command Nato's allied rapid
reaction force, to be based in southern Afghanistan. Nato
will later set up another headquarters to the east of
the country.
"Then all of Afghanistan will be under the Nato
flag," Gen Lute said.
Britain has also taken on the responsibility for eradicating
the country's opium poppy crop. Gen Lute said US forces
would work alongside the British only when they were available.
There were historic restrictions on the role of the US
in law enforcement activities, he said, adding that there
was no hard intelligence linking the narcotics trade with
"extremists". But he also said there was evidence
that the Taliban were still recruiting supporters. |
The US is expected to pull significant
numbers of troops out of Iraq in the next 12 months
in spite of the continuing violence, according to the
general responsible for near-term planning in the country.
Maj Gen Douglas Lute, director of operations at US
Central Command, yesterday said the reductions were
part of a push by Gen John Abizaid, commander of all
US troops in the region, to put the burden of defending
Iraq on Iraqi forces.
He denied the withdrawal was motivated by political
pressure from Washington.
He said: "We believe at some point, in order to
break this dependence on the . . . coalition, you simply
have to back off and let the Iraqis step forward."
"You have to undercut the perception
of occupation in Iraq. It's very difficult to do that
when you have 150,000-plus, largely western, foreign
troops occupying the country."
While he cautioned that any troop reduction would be
conditional on continued political progress and ongoing
improvement in Iraqi force training, he said Centcom
planners believed "the political process will play
out, that we will see a constitution, that we will see,
by some political machinations, the Sunnis brought into
the process and we will proceed to national elections
in December".
"If we see that and if we see progress on the
second front, which is continued progress with the Iraqi
security force next year, this time we'll be in the
position to make some adjustments in our force structure."
Last week, Gen Peter Schoomaker, US army chief of staff,
said his office was planning for the possibility that
troop levels could be maintained until 2009. But Maj
Gen Lute said such a worst-case scenario was unlikely.
"I will tell you this, as the operation officer
of Centcom, if a year from now I've got to call on all
those army troops that Gen Schoomaker is prepared to
provide, I won't feel real good about myself,"
he said. Gen George Casey, commander
of allied forces in Iraq, made similar comments last
month on reductions that could come by early next year
but they were quickly played down by the White House.
Pentagon plans for 'long war' on terror
The US hopes to pacify Iraq and then
take on al-Qaeda and its affiliates in an offensive
from the Horn of Africa to Afghanistan's borders.
George W. Bush, the US president, has said no decisions
have been made on troop levels in 2006. "I think
they were rumours. I think they're speculation,"
he said at his ranch in Crawford, Texas, this month
after meeting his national security team.
Yesterday, the president again insisted: "We
will stay, we will fight and we will win the war on
terror. An immediate withdrawal from Iraq or
the greater Middle East would only embolden the terrorists."
Scott McClellan, the White House spokesman, insisted
that Mr Bush and his top generals remained united on
the issue. "Any suggestion
that there is disagreement between the President and
our military commanders in Iraq is absurd," he
said.
"We are
all on the same page when it comes to our strategy
of standing up Iraqi forces so we can stand down our
forces. We have always said troop levels will be determined
by our commanders, based on conditions on the ground."
But Maj Gen Lute's comments the first
to detail extensively the reasons behind such a reduction
give credence to reports that Gen Abizaid hopes to hand
over to Iraqi forces within the next year large parts
of the 14 Iraqi provinces that have remained relatively
peaceful.
Maj Gen Lute, who is responsible for the Centcom's
plans over the next 12-18 months, said military officials
expected troop reductions to occur most rapidly outside
the Sunni Triangle. |
VIENNA, Aug. 24 (Xinhuanet)
-- A new case of mad cow disease was found in the southwestern
Austrian city of Graz, bringing to threethe total reported
cases of mad cow disease in the country, the health and
food security bureau said on Wednesday.
The 60-month-old infected cow was imported from Slovenia
and sent to a slaughter house in Graz, the Austrian news
agency quotedthe bureau as saying.
Local sanitary authorities discovered and confirmed
the infection during a routine inspection, it said.
The infected cow had not entered the food chain and
thus would not pose a threat to public health, the Ministry
for Health and Women's Issues said in a statement.
Mad cow disease, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy
(BSE), is caused by abnormal or misfolded prion proteins
in an animal's brain.
Austria's first mad cow disease case was discovered
four years ago and a second case was reported in June
this year. |
A senior UN representative
last night threatened to cite the British government for
violation of human rights over its planned deportations
of alleged terrorist sympathisers.
Manfred Novak, the UN human rights commission's special
investigator on torture, told the Guardian he is seeking
permission through the Foreign Office to visit Britain
to discuss the issue with the home secretary, Charles
Clarke.
In a statement on Tuesday night, Prof Novak said that
the government's intention to return radical preachers
to their countries of origin, even though some of those
countries have a track record of human rights abuses,
"reflects a tendency in Europe to circumvent the
international obligation not to deport anybody if there
is a serious risk that he or she might be subjected to
torture".
His intervention came as Mr Clarke, in response to the
London bombings, yesterday introduced a list of "unacceptable
behaviour" which would allowing him to deport or
exclude foreign citizens for glorifying or encouraging
terrorism. Mr Clarke said the first exclusions and deportations
would take place within the "next few days".
He rejected the UN criticism. He said "the human
rights of those people who were blown up on the tube in
London on July 7 are, to be quite frank, more important
than the human rights of the people who committed those
acts."
He added: "I wish the UN would
look at human rights in the round, rather than simply
focusing all the time on the terrorist."
But Prof Novak refused to accept
the rebuke. "The UN is strongly concerned about terrorism
and counter-terrorism. But there are certain standards
that have to be observed in the context of counter-terrorism,"
he said last night. "We in the western democratic
countries, in the fight against terrorism, should not
step over these limits by violating international law."
[...] |
WASHINGTON - Only weeks from a
summit on UN reforms, the United States has called for
a drastic renegotiation of the draft agreement and wants
to scrap many of its key provisions, The Washington
Post said.
A total of 750 amendments contained in a confidential
36-page document obtained by the Post have been presented
this week to selected envoys by the new US Ambassador
to the UN John Bolton, the newspaper said.
In them, the US government proposes
to eliminate new pledges on foreign aid to poor nations,
scrap provisions calling for action to halt climate
change and urging greater progress by nuclear powers
in dismantling their nuclear arms.
The US proposals also call for tougher
action against terrorism, promoting human rights and
democracy and halting the spread of the world's deadliest
weapons, the daily said.
Jean Ping, the current president of the UN General
Assembly, is trying to fine-tune a draft on the UN reform
package in time for the summit, scheduled for September
14-16, ahead of the UN General Assembly session.
The US amendments call for striking
any mention of the 2000 Millennium Development Goals,
in which UN members set goals over the next 15 years
to reduce poverty, preventable diseases and other scourges
of the world's poor.
In their stead, the US wants to underscore
the importance of the 2002 Monterrey (Mexico) Consensus,
that focused on free-market reforms and required governments
to improve accountability in exchange for aid and debt
relief, the Post said.
The proposals also underscore US efforts
to impose greater oversight of UN spending and to eliminate
any reference to the International Criminal Court.
The US administration also opposes
language that urges the five permanent members of the
UN Security Council not to cast vetoes on resolutions
to halt genocide, war crimes or ethnic cleansing, the
daily added.
The proposals, The Washington Post said, face strong
resistance from poorer countries who want the UN to
focus more on alleviating poverty and scale back US
propensity to intervene in small countries that abuse
human rights.
US and UN diplomats told the daily that Bolton has
indicated in face-to-face meetings with foreign delegates
that he is prepared to pursue other negotiating options
if the current process proves cumbersome.
Bolton has suggested replacing the entire document
with a brief statement, or splitting the document up
by themes so nations could choose the ones to support,
the diplomats said.
"We are looking at very, very difficult negotiations
in the days ahead," Pakistan's UN ambassador Munir
Akram was quoted as saying by the daily.
The United States has "strong positions, and many
of us do have very strongly held positions. That's the
nature of the game. My only regret is we didn't get
into the negotiations early enough," added the
ambassador. |
SINGAPORE - Oil surged to a record
$68 a barrel on Thursday, hounded by supply concerns
due to a growing threat to oil facilities from an Atlantic
storm and a large fall in U.S. gasoline stocks.
U.S. light crude was up 18 cents at $67.50 a barrel
by 0747 GMT, pausing after hitting $68
in early trade, the highest since U.S. crude futures
started trade in 1983. London Brent crude was
up 34 cents to $66.35.
Dealers are concerned about a thin stock cushion after
a rash of disruptions and tensions in oil-producing
countries cut crude output and propelled prices to a
series of record peaks.
Gasoline stockpiles in the United
States, the world's top oil consumer, beat forecasts
to register a slide of 3.2 million barrels in the week
to Aug. 19, widening the supply gap from a year ago,
the government Energy Administration Agency said.
Stocks of the auto fuel have contracted for eight straight
weeks, led by higher demand as the peak driving season
has almost two weeks to run its course.
Compounding the fears, a tropical storm is swirling
toward Florida, threatening U.S. oil and gas production
facilities in the Gulf of Mexico.
"The market is really starting
to get unhinged," said John Brady at ABN AMRO in
New York. "The majority can be attributed
to the storm, and some geopolitical concerns as well."
Tropical storm Katrina, which formed in the Bahamas
on Wednesday, was moving on a path that would likely
cut across southern Florida and into the Gulf of Mexico
later this week, the U.S. National Hurricane Center
said.
The storm was expected to hit the Miami area by Friday
as a weak hurricane moving slowly across the state into
the Gulf.
Market participants fear the storm may threaten oil
and gas producing areas in the central and eastern Gulf
of Mexico, where the United States derives between 20
and 25 percent of domestic crude and natural gas production.
The unusually active Atlantic
hurricane season has produced 11 named storms and could
culminate in as many as 21 tropical storms and 11 hurricanes,
forecasters have said.
SUPPLY WOES LINGER
Refinery snags have also skewed risks to the upside
as the oil industry struggles to keep pace with demand
growth, which has thus far proven remarkably resilient
amid soaring costs.
"There is very strong demand and we don't see
that demand receding," the International Monetary
Fund's chief Rodrigo Rato. said in a teleconference
on Thursday. "Prices are not going back to the
levels seen at the beginning of 2004."
Adding to the list was Shell
Oil Co.'s 153,000 barrel-per-day (bpd) refinery in Martinez,
California, which suffered
a malfunction in a production unit on Tuesday.
Tesoro Corp. said a 70,000-bpd gasoline-producing
unit at its 168,000-bpd Golden Eagle refinery in Martinez,
California, was shut on Wednesday following a fire.
And Huntsman Corp. declared
a force majeure on Wednesday on a large part of its
production of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), a
gasoline octane-booster, from its refinery in Port Neches,
Texas. Trade sources said the force majeure would
last for 45 days.
Output in Ecuador, which mostly supplies
crude to California, is still down to around 80 percent
of its 530,000-bpd level after attacks on oil infrastructure
last week.
Protesters, who have choked off oil exports, are threatening
a hunger strike to pressure the government on their
demands, dealing a blow to settlement talks.
The market also watched for disruption in Nigeria,
where some fuel stations shut down ahead of an expected
60 percent hike in fuel prices.
Previous government attempts to raise prices have led
to crippling general strikes in the world's 8th largest
oil exporter. |
WASHINGTON - Getting President
Bush from here to there consumes an enormous amount
of fuel, whether he's aboard Air Force One, riding in
a helicopter or on the ground in a heavily armored limousine.
The bill gets steeper every day as the
White House is rocked by the same energy prices as regular
drivers. Taxpayers still
foot the bill.
Almost every vehicle Bush uses is custom-made to add
security and communications capabilities, and the heavier
weight of these guzzlers further drives up gas and jet
fuel costs.
The White House declines to discuss travel costs related
to the presidential entourage, and did not respond to
a request for the overall effect of higher fuel prices
on its budget.
It is not Bush's choice to be ferried around in a less
than fuel- efficient manner. Those arrangements are
dictated by tradition and the Secret Service, whose
mission is to protect him.
But Bush is one of the nation's most-traveled
presidents.
He has visited 46 countries, some of them several times,
during his presidency. He has been to all states except
Vermont and Rhode Island.
So far this year, he has made 73 domestic and foreign
trips, including crisscrossing the country on a 60-day,
60-city tour to promote his Social Security plan. He
was on the road Wednesday, speaking to a military audience
in Idaho, before returning to his Texas ranch to resume
his summer vacation.
About the only vehicle Bush has much say in is the
2001 white Ford F250 pickup he keeps on his ranch. At
the nationwide gasoline average of $2.61 a gallon, it
would cost at least $75 to fill the Ford's tank. The
1999 four-wheel-drive model gets 13 miles per gallon
in the city, 17 on the highway, according to an Energy
Department Web site, http://www.fueleconomy.gov.
But much as he seems to relish any chance to get behind
the wheel, Bush actually drives the pickup very little,
confined as he is to only occasional visits to his ranch
and to remaining on its 1,600 acres when he's driving
himself.
Elsewhere, whether in Washington, Des Moines or Tbilisi,
Bush is driven in a large motorcade. The typical presidential
caravan has well over a dozen vehicles, including Bush's
limousine and an identical limo put in as a decoy.
The motorcade generally doesn't cruise placidly at
fuel-efficient speeds, but rather hurries along its
route as fast as possible. It also often idles outside
while Bush is at an event, burning up fuel but ready
to depart at a moment's notice.
The president's limos alone consume lots of gas.
Starting with his inaugural in January, Bush began
tooling around in new 2006 Cadillac DTS limos.
The full-sized luxury sedan version, available to the
general public, has an 18-gallon tank that would cost
about $47 to fill at that $2.61- a-gallon rate. (White
House vehicles are fueled at a special, dedicated facility
and the price paid per gallon there is not released.)
Cadillac spokesman Kevin Smith said the Cadillac DTS
sedan gets 18 mpg in the city, 27 on the highway.
The vehicle Bush uses is a much different animal -
with different gas mileage. An outside company customizes
the DTS for presidential use by "stretching"
it to limo length, adding bulletproof glass, heavy armor
and other bells and whistles - all making it significantly
heavier and less fuel-efficient, Smith said.
The same thing for the Chevrolet Suburbans that are
sometimes used as limo substitutes. The mass-marketed
2005 K1500 Suburban would cost nearly $81 to fill up
with its large 31-gallon tank. It gets 15 mpg in the
city, 19 on the highway, according to http://www.fueleconomy.gov
. But it's not clear exactly which trim model of Suburban
Bush uses, and his are custom-fitted with extra gear
that would reduce the gas mileage.
In the air, Bush most often flies on a Boeing 747-200B
laden with, among other things, an anti-missile system.
Like gas for cars, fuel costs
for the largest plane in the Air Force One fleet have
gone up dramatically - from $3,974 an hour in fiscal
2004 to $6,029 per hour now, according to the Air Force.
John Armbrust, publisher of Jet Fuel Report, said Air
Force One is no different from its commercial counterparts
in that respect.
"It's an expensive proposition to fly these planes,
whether its Air Force One or a regular 747," he
said.
Reducing his appearances outside the White House and
making other gestures toward fuel conservation could
help cut down on costs.
But some suggest that could do more harm for national
morale and Bush's image than good for the financial
bottom line.
Remember Jimmy Carter donning a sweater and asking
Americans facing an energy crisis to turn down their
thermostats? Or giving the speech about the nation's
"crisis of confidence" that led to his permanent
association with "malaise?" Carter's critics
turned both utterances into emblems that contributed
to his political undoing. |
BEIJING - China on Thursday accused
a high-profile dissident exiled to the United States
of plotting to sabotage upcoming celebrations marking
the 50th anniversary of the setting up the northwestern
autonomous region of Xinjiang.
Wang Lequan, the Communist Party secretary of the restive
region, said Rebiya Kadeer, a minority Muslim Uighur
businesswoman freed in March after years in jail, had
also evaded taxes, committed fraud and ran up huge debts.
"She said that once abroad she would never do
anything to damage state interests," Wang said
of Kadeer at a news conference. "But as soon as
she went over the border, she broke her promises."
While abroad, she had conspired with
separatists and religious extremists "about how
to plan terror attacks and jeopardize our 50th anniversary,"
he added.
The anniversary falls on China's National Day, October
1.
Wang, who sits on the politburo, making him one of
China's 24 most powerful leaders, did not elaborate,
but said Chinese authorities had reliable evidence of
the plot.
Kadeer was jailed in 1999 on charges of providing state
secrets abroad and released on medical parole. She was
not immediately available for comment.
The U.S.-based rights watchdog Human Rights Watch said
in May police had raided Kadeer's trading business in
Xinjiang, tried to arrest one of her sons and beaten
up and detained two of her associates.
Beijing keeps a tight grip on restive Xinjiang, which
borders
Afghanistan, Pakistan, three former Soviet Central Asia
republics, Russia and Mongolia.
Xinjiang, which means "New Frontier," a name
given during the Manchu Qing Dynasty, is considered
offensive by many advocates of independence.
Uighur militants, whom Beijing calls terrorists or
separatists, have been struggling for decades to make
the region an independent state called East Turkestan.
"No country would allow this, so we must take
tough measures," Wang said.
At the news conference, Xinjiang
governor Ismail Tiliwaldi said: "Terrorists
are now hated and detested in Xinjiang. They are like
rats run on to the street and everyone is screaming
'smash them!"' |
Leading figures from the arts
and media in Europe have joined forces to appeal to
Washington for the release of Judith Miller, the veteran
New York Times reporter who yesterday marked her 50th
day in prison for refusing to testify in the inquiry
into the leaking of the identity of the CIA operative
Valerie Plame.
"At a time when the most
extremist ideas are gaining ground, and when growing
numbers of reporters are being killed or taken hostage,
arresting a journalist in a democratic country is more
than a crime: it's a miscarriage of justice,"
the group said. Its 27 members include the Spanish film
director, Pedro Almódovar, the German literary
Nobel laureate, Gunther Grass, and the former chief
BBC reporter, Kate Adie.
Ms Miller was sent to a federal prison in the Virginia
suburbs outside Washington DC on 6 July for refusing
to reveal her sources in the case of Ms Plame, whose
identity as a CIA agent was revealed to American journalists
in 2003, apparently in violation of federal law.
No working member of the US
press in recent history has spent more time behind bars
than Ms Miller. She has already overtaken William
Farr, a reporter for the Los Angeles Herald-Examiner,
who was jailed in 1972 for 46 days for not revealing
sources in a criminal case.
Democrats said Ms Plame's name was leaked by the White
House in retaliation against her husband, ambassador
Joseph Wilson, who wrote an article in The New York
Times accusing the Bush team of overstating the evidence
regarding Saddam Hussein's possession of weapons of
mass destruction.
After a special prosecutor was appointed to investigate
the leak, Ms Miller and other US journalists were required
to testify to a grand jury about what they had been
told and by whom. Ms Miller and Matthew Cooper of Time
magazine refused. The latter finally agreed.
Friends and supporters say Ms Miller remains certain
she made the right decision to stand up for the right
of reporters to protect their sources. So she is likely
to stay in jail at least until the grand jury completes
its work on the case, which will probably be some time
in October.
Mr Cooper said Karl Rove, the senior adviser to President
George Bush, told him about Ms Plame and her job. Mr
Rove had told the grand jury he had had no such knowledge.
The furore - which triggered calls from many Democrats
for President Bush to fire Mr Rove - has subsided over
recent weeks. Even the plight of Ms Miller seems to
have been briefly forgotten by the wider press.
But that may quickly change when Mr Bush returns to
Washington from his summer break in Texas. The special
prosecutor, US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, could still
issue criminal charges in September or October.
If any are directed at members of the White House,
the scandal could quickly turn damaging for President
Bush. Mr Fitzgerald has already extended his investigation
beyond its original remit, to discover who leaked Ms
Plame's name and whether laws were broken. He is now
also looking into whether officials at the White House
lied to the grand jury and tried to cover up what was
said to reporters.
Ms Miller has supporters and critics. Last week, the
former presidential candidate and Republican Bob Dole
lamented her incarceration and voiced support for a
new federal law protecting reporters from legal consequence
for protecting sources.
Sympathy for Ms Miller has been
tempered in other quarters because of news articles
she wrote before the Iraq war supporting the administration's
claims that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.
|
PARIS - Sounding convinced that
Lance Armstrong is guilty of doping, the director of
the Tour de France said "we were all fooled"
and the seven-time champion owes an explanation for
"proven scientific facts" from a newspaper
report alleging he cheated to win cycling's most prestigious
event.
Jean-Marie Leblanc's comments appeared in the French
sports daily L'Equipe on Wednesday, a day after the
newspaper reported that six urine samples provided by
Armstrong during the '99 Tour tested positive for the
red blood cell-booster EPO.
"For the first time - and these are no longer
rumors, or insinuations, these are proven scientific
facts - someone has shown me that in 1999, Armstrong
had a banned substance called EPO in his body,"
Leblanc said.
"The ball is now in his court. Why, how, by whom?
He owes explanations to us and to everyone who follows
the tour. Today, what L'Equipe revealed shows me that
I was fooled. We were all fooled."
In a statement on his Web site on Tuesday, Armstrong
denied ever taking performance enhancing drugs and dismissed
the article as "tabloid journalism." A representative
for Armstrong said Wednesday that the cyclist was at
the Discovery Channel headquarters in Silver Spring,
Md., and would not have further comment on Leblanc's
statements.
It was the first time since doping whispers began to
swirl around Armstrong that Leblanc spoke critically
of him. Leblanc has expressed admiration for Armstrong
- while acknowledging that the Texan's methodical training
regimen took some of the European-style romance out
of the Tour.
While Leblanc seemed convinced of
Armstrong's guilt, fellow cyclists came to his defense.
"Armstrong always told me that he never used doping
products," five- time winner Eddy Merckx told Le
Monde newspaper. "Choosing between a journalist
and Lance's word, I trust Armstrong."
L'Equipe is owned by the Amaury Group whose subsidiary,
Amaury Sport Organization, organizes the Tour de France
and other sporting events. The paper has often raised
questions about whether Armstrong has ever used performance
enhancing drugs. On Tuesday, the banner headline of
its four-page report was "The Armstrong Lie."
EPO, formally known as erythropoietin,
was on the list of banned substances at the time Armstrong
won the first of his seven Tours, but there was no effective
test then to detect it.
The allegations took six years to surface because EPO
tests on the 1999 samples were carried out only last
year - when scientists at the national doping test lab
outside Paris opened them up again for research to perfect
EPO screening, with the blessing of the World Anti-Doping
Agency.
Another five-time Tour champion, Miguel Indurain, said
he couldn't understand why scientists would use samples
from the '99 Tour for their tests. [...]
L'Equipe's investigation was based on the second set
of two samples used in doping tests. The first set were
used up in 1999 for analysis at the time. Without
that first set of samples, any disciplinary action against
Armstrong would be impossible, French Sports Minister
Jean-Francois Lamour said.
Lamour said he had doubts about L'Equipe's report because
he had not seen the originals of some of the documents
that appeared in the paper.
"I do not confirm it," he told RTL radio.
But he added: "If what L'Equipe says is true, I
can tell you that it's a serious blow for cycling."
The International Cycling Union did not begin using
a urine test for EPO until 2001. For years, it had been
impossible to detect the drug, which builds endurance
by boosting the production of oxygen-rich red blood
cells.
Jacques de Ceaurriz, the head of France's anti-doping
laboratory, which developed the EPO urine test, told
Europe-1 radio that at least
15 urine samples from the 1999 Tour had tested positive
for EPO. The year before, there were more than 40 positive
samples, he said - reflecting how widespread the drug
was when riders thought they could not be caught. [...] |
Australian scientists
have discovered that meteors leave behind massive clouds
of dust.
The findings, published in the journal Nature, show the
grains of dust left behind are up to 100 times larger
than originally thought.
Researchers from the Australian Antarctic Division based
in Kingston, Tasmania, studied a large meteor that exploded
into the atmosphere in September 2004.
Meteors typically break up into blazing trails or shooting
stars that disappear.
But scientists now believe these are actually clouds
of dust and the grains are bigger than expected.
Researcher Andrew Klekociuk says the findings show the
September 2004 meteor had a mass of 1,000 tonnes.
"It's the first time we've been able to measure
the properties of dust from a large meteor entering the
atmosphere," he said.
"The particles we saw are pretty small by normal
standards - about one thousandth of a millimetre - but
that's 10 to 100 times larger than people normally expect
to see from the disintegration of a large meteoroid."
The grains eventually rain down from the atmosphere over
several weeks.
The study sugests that meteor dust may play a hidden
role in earth's climate.
Previous research has shown that particles spewed out
by volcanoes can play a crucial role in affecting weather.
Their relatively large size helps them to reflect the
sun's rays, thus creating a local cooling effect, and
also provides a nucleus for attracting atmospheric moisture
- meaning they encourage clouds to form.
The larger-than-expected size of the particles left behind
by meteors prompts the researchers to suggest they may
also affect the weather.
In addition, large particles tend to linger longest in
the atmosphere, sometimes taking months to reach the planet's
surface.
|
When a meteor the
size of a small house exploded with the force of an atomic
bomb high above the remote Antarctic coast last year there
was no one to witness the fireball or hear the sonic booms.
The nearest people in Antarctica were 900 kilometres
away, too distant to observe what would have appeared
like a second sun streaking across the cold afternoon
sky.
"Only the penguins would have seen it," said
Andrew Klekociuk, of the Australian Antarctic Division
in Hobart.
But in a stroke of extraordinary good luck, seven hours
later, the dust cloud from the explosion passed directly
over Davis Station, where Dr Klekociuk's colleague, Joseph
Zagari, happened to be working through the night.
His instruments already trained heavenwards, Mr Zagari
captured the first scientific measurements ever made of
meteor dust in the atmosphere, although at the time he
did not know what the mystery cloud was. An analysis of
the results, published today in the journal Nature, reveal
that the tiny meteor dust particles were about 1000 times
bigger than expected.
Dr Klekociuk said the study had important implications
for models of climate change. The particles were found
to be about a thousandth of a millimetre across, rather
than nanometre sized. This was large enough to reflect
sunlight and to encourage water droplets to form clouds.
Meteor dust had been assumed to have little impact on
climate, but now "requires further investigation",
he said.
Although no-one directly saw the fireball on September
3, 2004, the team later found out the meteor was detected
by US defence satellites at an altitude of about 75 kilometres.
This revealed the precise time and position the meteor
exploded.
The sonic booms were also detected as far away as Germany
by monitors set up to detect nuclear explosions in breach
of the test ban treaty.
If the explosion of the meteor - one of the largest in
a decade - was typical, then meteor dust could also be
responsible for many of the particles found in ice cores
which scientists had assumed were from volcanoes or small
meteors because of their size. |
GENEVA -- Pharmaceutical
company Roche Holding AG is donating 3 million treatment
courses of a bird flu drug to a reserve stock managed
by the World Health Organization, the U.N. agency said
Wednesday.
The antiviral oseltamivir, known commercially as Tamiflu,
is the only treatment proven to be effective in humans
against bird flu. WHO would use the reserve stock of the
drug to respond quickly to any emerging influenza pandemic
if stocks held by national governments were not enough.
"If a flu pandemic were to emerge, these drugs could
be flown quickly to the center of a potential pandemic,"
said WHO chief Dr. Lee Jong-wook. "We urge other
countries to help us build up the international stockpile."
Tamiflu could help reduce illness and death and could
potentially contain an emerging pandemic virus or slow
its spread when combined with other measures, WHO said.
The health agency is currently monitoring bird flu outbreaks
in parts of Asia, Russia and Kazakhstan and has warned
that it could evolve into a global influenza pandemic
if the virus mutates into a form that can transmit easily
between people.
The longer the H5N1 bird flu strain circulates, the greater
the risk that the virus will mutate into a form that can
be spread between people and trigger a pandemic, WHO said.
If that happens, slowing the pandemic's spread would critical
to allowing medical authorities time to produce vaccines
against the virus and introduce other emergency measures.
Antivirals, used intensively in an area where a pandemic
is emerging and combined with other measures such as quarantine
and isolation, could help delay the spread of a virus,
according to the health agency.
WHO said Roche will keep 3 million treatment courses,
or 30 million capsules, in reserve for up to five years.
The first million treatment courses will be ready early
next year, with the remaining 2 million ready before mid-2006.
WHO is urging countries to step up preparations as experts
predict an influenza pandemic will occur, although the
timing and severity is uncertain. |
RIPPLES of fat are
spreading ever wider across America’s waistline,
according to a report that suggests obesity rates rose
last year in all but one of the nation’s 50 states.
A survey published by Trust in America’s
Health indicated that almost one in four adults is clinically
obese and almost two thirds are overweight.
Mississippi is the fattest state, while six more from
the southeast are in the heftiest dozen. The state exhibiting
the largest increase in obesity last year was Alabama,
while only Oregon bucked the trend by holding steady at
21 per cent.
The trust, a non-profit organisation that promotes health
education, highlighted figures showing that 7 per cent
of US adults have diabetes and called for more government
action to tackle an obesity epidemic that it says is endangering
lives.
It is costing the country $39 billion (£21.6 billion)
in extra healthcare costs — and billions in lost
production.
There is a similar problem in Britain, where about one
adult in five is obese but, as ever, it is bigger in America.
In recent months carmakers are reported
to have been adapting designs to take account of the ever-growing
American belly, with the Honda Accord sold in the US two
inches wider than the same model in Europe and Japan.
Airlines are ditching magazines, seats
and even lifejackets to compensate for the increased fuel
costs of carrying their passengers’ extra pounds.
Meanwhile, US military strategists are
worrying about America’s long-term security because
so many potential recruits are too fat to fight.
The fast-food and soft-drink industry, which is estimated
to spend $11.2 billion a year on advertising, is beginning
to feel the heat. Seventeen states have recently passed
legislation aimed at tackling childhood obesity. Super
Size Me, a documentary film in which Morgan Spurlock became
fat and ill by eating only at McDonald’s for a month,
was widely seen as having helped to shame the restaurant
chain into offering healthier options last year.
Yesterday, a Harvard health report suggested that fast-food
retailers were deliberately targeting children by clustering
outlets around schools, while earlier this month Bill
Clinton joined a campaign to improve America’s eating
habits. The former President said a lifetime of eating
junk food had caused his “brush with death”
last year.
Recalling his quadruple heart bypass surgery, Mr Clinton
said: “I realised that one more time I’ve
been given another chance and I wanted to make the most
of it. The bottom line is we’ve got too many kids
overweight and they’re walking timebombs.”
But the junk-food industry is fighting
back against bans on the sale of drinks and snacks at
schools. In June, Jodi Rell, the Governor of Connecticut,
vetoed a statewide ban on unhealthy food in schools after
being pounded by $250,000 of industry lobbying.
Sales of soft drinks in schools totalled
about $700 million last year, with companies such as Coca-Cola
and Pepsi keen to target consumers when they are young
and establishing brand loyalties.
The National Restaurant Association, backed by a clutch
of senior Republican senators, held a press conference
this summer at which its president, Steven Anderson, said
that food establishments “should
not be blamed for issues of personal responsibility and
freedom of choice”.
Legislation is also opposed by the libertarian
Right in America, where organisations such as the Cato
Institute are outraged at the prospect of the Government
telling citizens how — or what — they should
eat.
FAT OF THE LAND
# 25 million people visit McDonald’s restaurants
each day in the US
# Southwest Airlines charges “customers of size”
the price of two seats
# In October 2002 Virgin Atlantic paid £13,000
to a Swansea woman squashed by an obese passenger
# Passengers’ weight gain caused US airlines to
burn 350 million more gallons of fuel in 2000 than in
1990 |
A strong earthquake
occurred at 10:15:35 (UTC) on Wednesday, August 24, 2005.
The magnitude 6.2 event has been located in NEAR THE EAST
COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN. (This event has been reviewed
by a seismologist.)
|
A light earthquake occurred at
19:59:01 (UTC) on Wednesday, August 24, 2005. The magnitude
4.6 event has been located OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU,
JAPAN. |
A moderate earthquake occurred
at 17:07:46 (UTC) on Wednesday, August 24, 2005. The
magnitude 5.1 event has been located in NORTHERN EAST
PACIFIC RISE [off the west coast of Mexico]. |
A light earthquake occurred at
02:27:44 (UTC) on Thursday, August 25, 2005. The magnitude
4.2 event has been located in NORTHERN CALIFORNIA [12
km (7 miles) SSW (198°) from Ferndale, CA.] The
hypocentral depth was estimated to be 27 km (17 miles).
|
HOT SPRINGS, N.C. --
If you thought you felt the earth move Wednesday night,
you were right.
An earthquake struck the western Carolinas and northeast
Georgia just after 11 p.m.
According to the United States Geological Survey, the
quake's epicenter was about 2 miles from Hot Springs,
N.C., which is about 25 miles north-northwest of Asheville.
Preliminary reports indicate the quake took place about
3 miles below the ground and reached a magnitude of 3.8.
The area where the quake occurred has been previously
identified by the USGS as having a higher potential for
earthquakes than much of the surrounding region.
People across the Upstate and as far south as Augusta
reported rattling dishes and glasses, and many said they
could feel the tremor coming as it approached.
Others closer to the epicenter described the event as
being like a bomb hitting their home.
The quake's duration was reported to be anywhere between
7 and 20 seconds.
No damage has been reported to emergency agencies so
far. |
MATAGORDA CO., TX - Miles and miles
of dead fish are turning up in Texas waters and it's
hitting Matagorda especially hard.
From the sky, a sea of white is covering the mouth
of the Colorado River. Upon closer look, you'll see
dead fish – millions of them.
"Unbelievable if you haven't seen it before,"
said Matagorda County Commissioner George Deshotel.
The stunning images of devastation
run for miles. It's one of the largest fish kills people
in the town of Matagorda have seen in years.
Ronnie Dodd runs a spring bridge and watched dozens
of fish die from his perch.
"The flounder were trying to get to the side of
the edge of the bank and trying to come up and get air,"
he told us.
Surprisingly, this is a natural event
caused by stagnant water and little wind, rain, or flow.
"Millions of these menhaden come in from the Gulf
into the Colorado River and because of low tidal action
and low wind action, there's nothing to replenish the
oxygen in the water," said Deshotel.
Texas Parks and Wildlife is closely monitoring the
situation.
"It'll run its course, and when it's done, it's
done," said Bill Balboa with Texas Parks and Wildlife.
"It may happen again, but it happens all up and
down the coast."
But for now, Matagoda is the worst place...a place
with a community that depends on the fish that are quickly
dying.
The fish began dying a few days ago. If the menhaden
keep coming in and the conditions don't change, more
can die. And that's not good news for the local economy.
Back in 1995, there was a similar
situation. Then, 60 million fish turned up dead.
If you see dead fish, shrimp or crabs, contact the Texas
Parks and Wildlife Department's 24-hour hotline. That
number is 512-389-4848. |
Serbian authorities
are investigating reports of a real-life Superman after
people claimed to have seen a cloaked figure flying over
their houses.
Hundreds of residents in Ljubovija described seeing a
cloaked person flying above buildings "as if he had
an invisible engine on his back" and changing directions
while in mid-air, local daily Blic reported.
One local said: "It was like something out of Superman
or Batman. No one has any rational explanation for what
we all saw."
Police in the town have refused to comment. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|