As many of you know,
Signs of the Times is not supported by major funding like
many other news sites, and is not affiliated with any
government, political group, corporation, or news agency.
SOTT is financed by any donations we receive as well as
money out of our own pockets. The benefit of this setup
is that we do not have any sponsors that might introduce
unwanted bias into our work. The
obvious and major drawback is that we do not have the
funding to do all the things we would like to do for our
readers.
Almost one year ago, SOTT created the P3nt4gon Str!ke presentation, which has now been viewed by
well over 300,000,000 people worldwide, and is available
in nine different languages. Recently, we wrote and produced
the song You
Lied, performed by Away
With the Fairys. We also recorded our first ever podcast,
beginning a project which we had been trying to get off
the ground for over a year.
A
SOTT editor poses next to his computer
To produce the Signs page, we work very long days (often
upwards of 14-16 hours) without pay. We do it because
we love it, and because our readers often write to tell
us how they have benefited from our work. In order to
continue expanding our work and deepen our analysis and
understanding of our world, we need to enlarge our library.
There are many books we would like to have that we cannot
afford. With our increasing use of sound files and our
future projects that include video, we have and will continue
to incur higher bandwidth costs. As well, the Signs page
and related projects are created on several computers
which are each upwards of five years old. They are very
slow, increasingly unreliable, and won't support regular
podcasts and videos.
Unfortunately, we do not have the financial means to
purchase the books we need, much less new equipment. Current
donations only support our basic needs and living expenses.
In order to continue producing the Signs page, the podcast,
Flash presentations, and expand our operations further,
we need your support.
At the moment, we are preparing six Signs of the
Times Commentary books. These books are collections
of SOTT commentary grouped according to theme. They will
be available for sale soon, and any proceeds will go towards
helping to cover our increasing operating costs.
Our target, based on estimated costs for all the necessary
materials, upgrades, and operating costs for the coming
year is 28,000 euros.
--
Here's How You Can Help Signs of the Times --
Any donation you
can make will help us to continue to produce and improve
the Signs page.
If you donate 50 euros
(approximately US$60; click
here for current exchange rate), you will be a Bronze
Supporter.
Bronze
Supporters will receive a complementary
copy of the 911 Conspiracy Signs
Commentary book.
If you donate 100
euros, you will be a Silver
Supporter.
Silver
Supporters will receive a complementary copy
of 911 Conspiracy, US Freedom, and The
Media.
Donations
of 175 euros will qualify you as a Gold
Supporter.
Gold
Supporters will receive the entire set of
six commentary books: 911 Conspiracy, The
Human Condition, The Media, Religion,
US Freedom, and The Work.
Donations of 250 euros will
qualify you as a Platinum Supporter.
Platinum
Supporters will receive the entire set of
six commentary books: 911 Conspiracy, The
Human Condition, The Media, Religion,
US Freedom, and The Work. In addition,
they will receive one other book of their choice free
from our bookstore.
We have more projects like our podcast in
the works - but we need your
help to make them a reality!
Thank
you in advance from the editors and the rest of the team
at Signs of the Times!
Special courts sitting
in secret for pre-trial hearings in terror cases are
being considered by the Home Office.
Judges would look at whether there was enough evidence
against suspects for cases to proceed.
On Friday, Tony Blair said the government was looking
into a new court procedure allowing pre-trial hearings,
as he unveiled new terror measures.
Labour home affairs committee chairman John Denham
has called the government's anti-terror plans "half-baked".
The Home Office said details of how terror cases would
be tried were still being worked out, but
confirmed a move to judge-only courts was under active
consideration.
Phone-taps?
Sources told BBC News that one possibility was a model
similar to the Special Immigrations Appeals Tribunal,
which sits in secret and keeps the details of charges
from those facing them.
Defendants are represented by special advocates, who
have access to the evidence but do not brief their 'clients'
on the details.
The Home Office has said there is no truth in newspaper
reports that the courts would be able to use phone-tap
evidence, which is currently inadmissible.
Liberal Democrat President Simon Hughes suggested there
"may be a case" for security-vetted judges
to undertake special work.
But he doubted a major extension of the time suspects
were held, which some experts believe may result from
the plans, could be justified.
'Botched'
Conservative spokesman Edward Garnier urged the government
to "calm down and think these things through"
and to consult other parties on the detailed proposals.
Ian Macdonald QC, who resigned last year as a barrister
in special terror cases, said he thought the secret
courts proposal might be botched.
"It will in fact be a method of extending detention
of suspects for more than two weeks," he said.
Unveiling a raft of counter-terror proposals on Friday,
Mr Blair said British hospitality had been abused but
people should know the "rules of the game are changing".
He also announced plans to extend powers to deport
or exclude foreigners who encourage terrorism, perhaps
through changing human rights laws.
'Half-baked'
There could also be new powers to close mosques and
automatic refusal of asylum to anyone with anything
to do with terrorism.
Police and lawyers are also meeting this week to discuss
the possibility of charging some outspoken Islamist
radicals with treason.
The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats have accused
the government of confusion by continuing to announce
new measures in response to the 7 July attacks.
Senior Labour MP Mr Denham said the ministers had initially
produced a considered response to the London attacks,
but that it now looked like they were acting in a knee-jerk
fashion.
"I think they have got
to get a grip on it very, very quickly, stop floating
half-baked ideas and get back a proper cross-party consensus
on the serious measures that have to be taken."
A Downing Street spokeswoman said Tony Blair had made
it clear how he wants to proceed.
Comment: At
what point do we seriously begin to consider the clear
parallels between what is currently happening in the
UK and the US and events in Germany leading up to WWII?
Using the excuse of a trumped up threat from dangerous
groups that were, the NAzis claimed, seeking to sow
discord in Germany society, the Nazis slowly imposed
totalitarian rule on the German people. Today, Bush
and Blair are using the equally bogus claim that "Islamic
extremists" want to destroy Western civilisation
and freedom to justify the imposition of a third Reich-sytle
regimes in Britain and America, where any and all previously-held
social freedoms must give way to the need to protect
the people from those that our leaders claim want to
take away those freedoms. Coincidentally, this "protection"
involves the removal of those same social freedoms by
our leaders who claim their goal is to protect them.
It's a mind-job for sure, and Bush and Blair are betting
on their subjects' inability to figure it out.
So tell us; how bad does it have to get before we all
begin to stand up and point out the big, stinking dead
elephant in the room? Remember, as it was in the case
of Nazi Germany, the takeover of a previously Democratic
country by a fascist cabal from within occurs in the
absence of general awareness that anything untoward
is happening. Precious few German citizens were able
to admit to themselves the truth that was staring them
in the face, being blinded by the government lies and
propaganda that bombarded them daily. Those that did
realise were surely only able to do so as a result of
careful consideration of the facts, while at the same
time dismissing any idealistic notions about what their
government SHOULD be or what it would or would not do.
LONDON (Reuters) -
A British court on Monday remanded
in custody a suspected Islamist radical arrested on
a U.S. extradition warrant which accuses him of trying
to set up a militant training camp in the state of Oregon.
Haroon Rashid Aswad, a 30-year-old British citizen,
was arrested at Northolt military airbase in northwest
London on Sunday after being deported from Zambia.
Dressed in a long black robe, Aswad appeared at Belmarsh
high-security courtroom in east London.
He stood behind a glass screen, flanked by police officers
with bulletproof vests, and spoke only to confirm his
identity and that he understood the charges against
him.
"He denies any suggestion
he's a terrorist or has engaged in any terrorist activity,"
his lawyer Hussein Zahir told reporters.
A judge ordered Aswad to appear in court again on Thursday
for the start of extradition proceedings against him.
The U.S. warrant accuses Aswad of
plotting with others between October 1999 and April
2000 to train and equip people to fight in Afghanistan.
He was arrested on July 20 in Zambia.
Initial media reports linked him to
the July 7 London suicide bombings that killed more
than 50 people, but British police say he was not thought
to be involved in those attacks.
Comment: So,
eh..where exactly is the crime in training people to
fight in Afghanistan during 1999 and 2000? Wasn't that
the period of time when the evil Taleban were in power?
Is this man perhaps then an Afghan freedom fighter?
Should it not have been the remit of the "greatest
Democracy on earth" to aid such people in their
efforts?
But of course, we forget.
At that time, the evil Taleban were being wooed by
the US state department at luxury dinners in Texas and
Washington in an attempt to get their permission for
the laying of a Unocal oil pipeline through their country.
When they refused the terms offered to them by the Bushes,
9/11 coincidentally came along and, hey presto, the
Taleban were converted into Islamic terrorists.
In fact, the Taleban really did (and still do) fit
the profile of "terrorists", but then the
US government was well aware of that fact, having trained
and funded them in the late 70's and early 80's, first
against the Fledgling Afghan Democracy headed by Nur
Mohammad Taraki of the PDPA, and then later against
the Russians.
NEW YORK (Reuters)
- Scientists released a harmless
gas in the streets and subways of New York on Monday
in a drill to see how to respond to a chemical or biological
attack.
The exercise came as the city, already on high alert
since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade
Center, raised security following bombings on the London
mass transit system last month.
Peter Bengtson, spokesman for the Urban Dispersion
Program which is funded by the U.S. Department for Homeland
Security, said it was the first of six test days between
now and August 26 when the gas would be released at
different locations and times of day to see how it spreads
in various conditions.
He said the distinctive skyscraper canyons of Manhattan
and the variety of buildings made it difficult to predict
how the wind would carry a gas released either in an
attack or by accident. "The air flows are not intuitive,"
he said.
"These models are to aid and improve training
for emergency responders ... so they can determine where
and how the winds flow and determine where to evacuate
people and where to tell people to take shelter,"
Bengtson said.
Bengtson said the gas drill was one of the most complex
ever conducted as the releases would be not just outdoors
but in the subway and in a building.
Around 100 scientists and 50 assistants are working
on the project and have set up more than 200 sampling
instruments on rooftops, the sides of buildings and
other sites. Two detector boxes were seen hanging from
a lamp-post in Times Square.
Bengtson said two gases were being used in the drills,
sulfur hexafluoride and perfluorocarbon, which are both
odorless and colorless. The scientists planned to release
the gases three times during each of the test days.
Comment: Given
that on the morning of 9/11 the US government was conducting
a simulated terror attack in New York City, we should
view this drill as prediction of future events rather
than a mere precautionary test measure.
PARIS, Aug 8 (AFP)
- A confidential report by France's
intelligence service that was finalised days before the
7 July London bombings pointed to the threat of an Al-Qaeda
attack on Britain, the French daily Le Figaro said Monday.
The conservative daily said the
report by the DCRG intelligence agency also highlighted
the need to closely observe France's Pakistani community
with a view to preventing an attack on French soil.
An official at the interior ministry confirmed the existence
of the report, but cautioned it was "a very technical
study on the Pakistani community in France".
He said it was not aimed at lecturing Britain on what
might happen on its own soil.
Le Figaro said the report, which focused on France's
Pakistani community, was completed just before the July
7 attacks on London in which 56 people were killed, including
the four suicide bombers.
According to the report quoted by Le Figaro, "the
United Kingdom remains under the threat of plans decided
at the highest level of al-Qaeda".
"These (plans) would be put into practice by operatives,
with support of Jihadists within the large Pakistani community
in Britain," it said.
"France is not immune from this
kind of violent group", the report said, adding "observation
of the Pakistani community" was essential to prevent
any acts of violence on French territory.
Comment: Indeed,
observation of the Pakistani ISI is even more essential
to protect against further "terror attacks",
given that then Pakistani ISI chief had wired $100,000
dollars to alleged chief hijacker, Mohammed Atta, and
just happened to be having breakfast with Senator Bob
Graham on the morning of 9-11. French intelligence seems
to be well aware of the status of Pakistan's ISI as the
'middle man' between "Islamic terrorists" (read
hired hit men) and their CIA (and possibly Mossad) paymasters.
The report pointed to "the multiplication of passages
through France by Pakistani activists from south Asia
or London and the setting up of underground or official
representations of the main extremist groups".
In particular it named the Lashkar-e-Taiba, an organisation
which is linked to Al-Qaeda, adding that several hundred
Pakistanis living in France "have chosen the path
of terrorism and salafism to express their hatred of the
West." Salafism is one of the most radical expressions
of Islam.
Le Figaro said that in April 2005 France had refused
entry to a Pakistani Islamic senator who was a member
of a Pakistani parliamentary delegation in Europe "because
of his membership of an Islamist group linked to the Taliban".
The hardline Islamic Taliban, which had ties with al-Qaeda,
ruled Afghanistan until it was ousted in a US-led campaign
in late 2001.
Another Islamist senator managed to stay in France in
November 2004, even though he had been banned from French
soil, the report said.
After he left, police arrested the people who had helped
him stay in France, Le Figaro said.
The report said that the refusal to deliver visas had
unleashed strong criticisms against France from "Pakistani
extremists".
Comment:
Obviously, there are divisions within the French elite
over how to proceed. Elements such as Sarkozy want an
open alliance with Zionism. Others do not. We assume that
this division extends into the French alphabet soup agencies
as well. The Atlanticists in France have been working
for a closer relationship with Washington since WWII.
Fortunately, the strong Gaullist current in France has
been able to maintain a semblance of independence.
By Steve Coll and Susan B.
Glasser
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, August 7, 2005; Page A01
In
the snow-draped mountains near Jalalabad in November
2001, as the Taliban collapsed and al Qaeda lost its
Afghan sanctuary, Osama bin Laden biographer Hamid Mir
watched "every second al Qaeda member carrying
a laptop computer along with a Kalashnikov" as
they prepared to scatter into hiding and exile. On
the screens were photographs of Sept. 11 hijacker Mohamed
Atta.
Nearly four years later, al
Qaeda has become the first guerrilla movement in history
to migrate from physical space to cyberspace.With laptops and DVDs, in secret
hideouts and at neighborhood Internet cafes, young code-writing
jihadists have sought to replicate the training, communication,
planning and preaching facilities they lost in Afghanistan
with countless new locations on the Internet.
Al Qaeda suicide bombers and ambush units in Iraq routinely
depend on the Web for training and tactical support,
relying on the Internet's anonymity and flexibility
to operate with near impunity in cyberspace. In Qatar,
Egypt and Europe, cells affiliated with al Qaeda that
have recently carried out or seriously planned bombings
have relied heavily on the Internet.
Such cases have led Western intelligence agencies and
outside terrorism specialists to conclude that the
"global jihad movement," sometimes
led by al Qaeda fugitives but increasingly made up of
diverse "groups and ad hoc cells," has
become a "Web-directed" phenomenon, as a presentation
for U.S. government terrorism analysts by longtime State
Department expert Dennis Pluchinsky put it.Hampered
by the nature of the Internet itself, the government
has proven ineffective at blocking or even hindering
significantly this vast online presence.
Among other things, al Qaeda and its offshoots are
building a massive and dynamic online library of training
materials -- some supported by experts who answer questions
on message boards or in chat rooms -- covering such
varied subjects as how to mix ricin poison, how to make
a bomb from commercial chemicals, how to pose as a fisherman
and sneak through Syria into Iraq, how to shoot at a
U.S. soldier, and how to navigate by the stars while
running through a night-shrouded desert. These materials
are cascading across the Web in Arabic, Urdu, Pashto
and other first languages of jihadist volunteers.
The Saudi Arabian branch of al Qaeda launched an online
magazine in 2004 that exhorted potential recruits to
use the Internet: "Oh Mujahid brother, in order
to join the great training camps you don't have to travel
to other lands," declared the inaugural issue of
Muaskar al-Battar, or Camp of the Sword. "Alone,
in your home or with a group of your brothers, you too
can begin to execute the training program."
"Biological Weapons" was the stark title
of a 15-page Arabic language document posted two months
ago on the Web site of al Qaeda fugitive leader Mustafa
Setmariam Nasar, one of the jihadist movement's most
important propagandists, often referred to by the nom
de guerre Abu Musab Suri. His document described "how
the pneumonic plague could be made into a biological
weapon," if a small supply of the virus could be
acquired, according to a translation by Rebecca Givner-Forbes,
an analyst at the Terrorism Research Center, an Arlington
firm with U.S. government clients. Nasar's guide drew
on U.S. and Japanese biological weapons programs from
the World War II era and showed "how to inject
carrier animals, like rats, with the virus and how to
extract microbes from infected blood . . . and how to
dry them so that they can be used with an aerosol delivery
system."
Jihadists seek to overcome in cyberspace specific obstacles
they face from armies and police forces in the physical
world. In planning attacks, radical operatives are often
at risk when they congregate at a mosque or cross a
border with false documents. They are safer working
on the Web. Al Qaeda and its
offshoots "have understood that both time and space
have in many ways been conquered by the Internet,"
said John Arquilla, a professor at the Naval Postgraduate
School who coined the term "netwar" more than
a decade ago.
Al Qaeda's innovation on the Web "erodes the ability
of our security services to hit them when they're most
vulnerable, when they're moving," said Michael
Scheuer, former chief of the CIA unit that tracked bin
Laden. "It used to be they had to go to Sudan,
they had to go to Yemen, they had to go to Afghanistan
to train," he added. Now, even when such travel
is necessary, an al Qaeda operative "no longer
has to carry anything that's incriminating. He doesn't
need his schematics, he doesn't need his blueprints,
he doesn't need formulas." Everything is posted
on the Web or "can be sent ahead by encrypted Internet,
and it gets lost in the billions of messages that are
out there."
The number of active jihadist-related
Web sites has metastasized since Sept. 11, 2001. When
Gabriel Weimann, a professor at the University of Haifa
in Israel, began tracking terrorist-related Web sites
eight years ago, he found 12; today, he tracks more
than 4,500. Hundreds of them celebrate al Qaeda or its
ideas, he said.
"They are all linked indirectly through association
of belief, belonging to some community. The Internet
is the network that connects them all," Weimann
said. "You can see the virtual community come alive."
Apart from its ideology and clandestine nature, the
jihadist cyberworld is little different in structure
from digital communities of role-playing gamers, eBay
coin collectors or disease sufferers. Through continuous
online contact, such communities bind dispersed individuals
with intense beliefs who might never have met one another
in the past. Along with radical jihad, the Internet
also has enabled the flow of powerful ideas and inspiration
in many other directions, such as encouraging democratic
movements and creating vast new commercial markets.
[...]
Comment: The
web has become the only widely accessible source for
real news in recent years. With the controlled media
in those nations whose leaders support the war on terror
- especially the major US news outlets - the masses
read whatever their leaders want them to read. The internet
is still relatively free and open, and with a little
digging and fact-checking, one can learn volumes about
the lies spread by our leaders.
Recently, we have seen a lot of talk about "al-Qaeda
on the web". As we remarked previously, how many
of us have actually seen these alleged terrorist web
sites? The answer is most likely none of us,
because we would all be too afraid to be associated
with the "terrorists" who are detained indefinitely
and rendered to countries like Egypt to be tortured.
Contrast these alleged sites with alternative news
sites like Signs
of the Times, where the reader is provided with
information and news articles that can open the door
into further research and verification. The reader has
the possibility to discover the truth about Bush and
Blair's current crusade, or at the very least to verify
that we aren't just making things up. The same cannot
be said for the supposed terrorist web presence that
has received so much press in recent weeks. You really
have to hand it to the powers that be: not only are
people afraid of the idea of evil terrorists using the
internet to plan attacks, but they are afraid of even
attempting to verify that such terrorists exist or that
they are in fact on the internet!
It seems that the whole point is to associate the internet
and groups who communicate via the internet with terrorism
in an effort to get an iron grip on the remaining bits
and pieces of the media that remain relatively free.
Censorship of the web will be accepted with open arms
if it is couched in terms of "fighting the evil
terrorists". Just as the Bush Reich's recent moves
on the Patriot Act and the use of US troops inside the
"homeland" met with little resistance despite
Bush's rock-bottom ranking in the polls. We do not expect
much of an uproar when the internet is effectively locked
down.
If the Bush gang follows its standard operating procedure,
the entire internet will not be shut down; rather, heavy
censorship will be employed to maintain the illusion
of the "free internet". Why else would the
US want to retain such tight control of the internet's
DNS servers?
CHICAGO - The president-elect of
the nation's largest lawyers group on Monday said some
of the federal government's investigative powers included
in the anti-terrorism Patriot Act are a threat to constitutional
rights.
Michael Greco criticized aspects of the act, passed
to bolster security after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks,
at the American Bar Association convention, where U.S.
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales urged the U.S. Congress
to renew it.
"We support the (Bush)
administration in its efforts to secure the nation but
we have taken policy positions, four or five of them,
where we think due process has not been followed,"
Greco said in an interview with Reuters.
He criticized exceptions the law makes to the constitution's
privacy protections that give law enforcement the power
to search a home without the homeowner's knowledge and
without a judge-approved search warrant.
"The ABA position is that some
of these provisions are so invasive of individual liberties
that there has to be a sunset provision. They're offensive,
I think, to democracy," Greco said.
Members of a conference committee in Congress seeking
to reconcile competing versions of the law's renewal
are debating whether to include a four-year or 10-year
"sunset" clause that would allow some of those
provisions to expire.
In his address, Gonzales insisted the
Patriot Act was essential to fighting terrorism and
accused critics of clouding the debate with "a
litany of misstatements and half-truths."
Comment: Well,
that's original: "We're not fascists. Our critics
are all liars!" Unfortunately for Mr. Gonzales,
his critics present all sorts of interesting facts about
the provisions of the Patriot Act, while Alberto himself
has nothing but hot air and insults to defend himself.
"We are fighting terrorism with the tools and
techniques provided for in the Patriot Act, tools that
have long been available to fight crime," he said.
"We are doing this in a manner that protects individual
rights and liberties.
"We are not interested in the reading habits of
ordinary citizens (and) we are subject to the oversight
of federal judges," Gonzales said, citing an oft-ridiculed
provision that gives law enforcement powers to review
library records and bookstore sales.
Although delegates to the group's
annual convention did not single out President Bush,
several resolutions appeared aimed at administration
stances.
The group, which represents more than
400,000 attorneys, judges and law students, passed by
unanimous voice vote a resolution calling for respect
for judges.
Bush, for instance, has complained
in the past about "activist judges" whose
rulings have allowed gays to marry and otherwise angered
conservatives. An outcry led by House Majority
Leader Tom DeLay also followed judicial rulings in the
right-to-die case involving Terri Schiavo, the brain-dead
Florida woman whose former husband ultimately succeeded
in having her feeding tube removed.
ABA delegates this week were expected to approve a
halt to a perceived erosion of attorney-client privilege
and a federal shield law for reporters seeking to protect
their sources.
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. - President Bush
on Monday signed sweeping legislation that provides
billions of dollars in tax subsidies to energy companies,
yet does little quickly to ease gas prices or lower
America's reliance on foreign oil.
"This bill is not going to solve our energy challenges
overnight," Bush said just before signing the bill
into law. "It's going to take years of focused
efforts to alleviate those problems."
Bush traveled here from his ranch in Crawford, Texas,
to sign the 1,724-page bill, which was passed, with
bipartisan support, to end a yearlong standoff in Congress
over national energy policy.
The bill-signing ceremony at Sandia National Laboratories
in Albuquerque begins a week of events meant to highlight
recently passed legislation and underscore economic
and national security issues. In coming days, Bush meets
at his Texas ranch with his defense and economic advisers
and travels to Illinois to sign a highway bill.
Supporters of the energy bill say that in the long
run, the new law will refocus the nation's energy priorities
and promote cleaner and alternative sources of energy.
Bush has said he believes the nation must find new ways,
besides fossil fuels, to power the economy.
"This economy is moving, and
what this energy bill does is that it recognizes that
we need more affordable and reliability sources of energy,"
Bush said. "This bill launches an energy strategy
for the 21st century and I've really been looking forward
to signing it."
But even the bill's sponsors acknowledged
the legislation will have little, if any impact, on
today's energy prices or less dependence on oil imports.
Crude-oil prices rallied to a new high above $63 a
barrel on Monday, reflecting market fears over the U.S.
embassy closure in Saudi Arabia due to security threats
and concerns that shutdowns of U.S. oil refineries would
reduce supply.
When he arrived, Bush took a tour of the Energy Department's
national solar thermal test facility, which was built
in 1976 in response to the oil embargo and energy crisis.
Bush walked in a field of mirrored solar panels, wearing
shirt sleeves and sunglasses to ward off the bright
midday sun.
New Mexico is home to Republican Sen. Pete Domenici,
a driving force in getting the measure passed. Domenici,
who chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee,
said the bill is not for today or tomorrow, but is a
"bill for the future."
"It means less dependence on foreign oil,"
he said. "When we expand ethanol and the other
things in this bill, we will grow less dependent, not
all the way, but less dependent."
New Mexico Sen. Jeff Bingaman, the top Democrat on
Energy Committee, praised the passage of the bill but
said more must be done to tap the potential of renewable
energy, address global warming and use less oil from
overseas.
The bill did not "markedly
reduce these imports," Bingaman said in a statement.
"We need to build a consensus around effective
steps to use less oil in our transportation sector,
which is the basic cause of our increasing reliance
on oil imports."
The measure funnels billions of dollars
to energy companies, including tax breaks and loan guarantees
for new nuclear power plants, clean coal technology
and wind energy.
But for the first time, utilities
will be required to comply with federal reliability
standards for its electricity grid, instead of self-regulation.
That is intended to reduce the chance of a repeat
of a power blackout, such as the one that struck the
Midwest and Northeast in the summer of 2003.
For consumers, the bill would provide tax credits for
buying hybrid gasoline-electric cars and making energy-conservation
improvements in new and existing homes. Also, beginning
in 2007, the measure extends daylight-saving time by
one month to save energy.
"If you're in the market for a car, this bill
will help you save up to $3,500 on a fuel-efficient
hybrid or clean-diesel vehicle," Bush said.
The bill's price tag - $12.3
billion over 10 years - is twice what the White House
had first proposed. It does not include Bush's
desire to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to
oil exploration. Drilling advocates, however, have a
backup plan that is expected to unfold in mid-September.
Domenici said he will include a provision
authorizing Arctic drilling as part of a budget procedure
that is not subject to filibuster. A similar maneuver
is being planned in the House, although the final strategy
is being worked out.
Critics of the energy bill are speaking out while Bush
is in New Mexico. The League of Conservation Voters,
The Wilderness Society, the New Mexico Wilderness Alliance,
USAPIRG and others plan to highlight what else is not
in the energy bill.
Martha Marks of Santa Fe, N.M., president of the National
Republicans for Environmental Protection, said the 10-year-old
grass-roots organization was disappointed in the final
version passed by Congress.
"It really gives a short shrift
to conservation and it still continues to subsidize
the well-established oil and gas industries that really
don't need subsidizing especially when (crude) oil is
$60 a barrel," she said.
"The American suburban juggernaut can be described
succinctly as the greatest misallocation of resources
in the history of the world. The mortgages, bonds,
real estate investment trusts and derivative financial
instruments associated with this tragic enterprise
must make the judicious goggle with wonder and nausea."
How true this is.
The era of cheap credit, legalized counterfeiting,
and the constant attempts to get people to take on ever
increasing amounts of debt in order to finance the American
"dream", is resulting in a classic misallocation
of resources that can be observed in the over expansion
of real estate related construction. I can see symptoms
of the raging credit disease as I drive down the old
2 lane road, which became a 4 lane highway only a few
years ago.
Some visual symptoms:
1. A housing boom has gripped the area. Everyone is
going to get rich building "spec" houses and
selling them for a tremendous profit.
2. The giant home improvement chain store(Loew's) is
building a huge new store/warehouse only 12 miles from
their existing store. This new store is going to be
even bigger than their existing big box store which
is only 12 miles away. This is a direct response to
the overheated construction market and the homeowner
use of loan refinancing to expand their current house
by adding on to it.
There are also 3 or 4 other building supply warehouse
stores in the area. (Home Depot, etc).
3. Auto and truck dealers are expanding their lots
and are building new sales offices, etc. This is a side
effect of the home loan refinancing boom.
4. Real estate offices now permeate the landscape.
Many of these are not the old one or two level offices
but are now 4 level high complexes, stuffed with newly
licensed brokers who are all going to get rich selling
homes.
5. A Wal-Mart cashier, about 22-25 years old, just
got her real estate license and looks forward to making
a career in real estate.
6. Loan and lending offices have sprung up like weeds,
advertising loans for every occasion. The standard highway
advertising billboard urges people to refinance their
homes and enjoy the cash windfall.
A picture of a loan officer holding a big flower basket
of dollars out to passing drivers was erected recently.
"Get yourself some green!", the sign says.
7. Local political officials, hand in hand with the
local Chamber of Commerce and churches, applaud all
of this as a new golden era for the people.
The motto seems to be:
Eternal growth = prosperity = moral superiority.
U.S. flags are plastered over much of the landscape.
In the minds of these people, the proof of American
moral superiority is provided by the "booming"
economy.
According to these folks, the American way of life
represents a divine display of superior economic success
combined with superior morality.
Naturally, they feel the clearest proof of this is found
in themselves.
See what happens when you worship the one true God!
However, most of this mind-numbing reality is in fact
a sham.
This particular form of "economic growth"
is not true wealth creation. It's financed by a fundamentally
dishonest system that creates phony money, drops it
on the population in the form of E-Z loans, which in
turn drives up the prices of selected assets. More and
more resources are funneled into the maw of this "growth",
as the perception of getting something for nothing becomes
imprinted on the people.
The equations that emerge from this experiment in dishonesty
are:
debt = prosperity - asset inflation = wealth creation.
As long as prices of the inflating assets are fueled
by an ever increasing creation of debt, everything is
fine. I suspect that when the saturation point for debt
is reached, and when public confidence in the scheme
starts to waver, the "boom" that's going on
here is going to produce a "bust" of epic
proportions. The loan defaults alone could be enough
to suck this area into an economic black hole.
Not only are these people going to owe more on their
houses than they're worth, there won't be many buyers
for those homes.
When the house price spiral reverses, the vast majority
of people here will be flat broke, busted.
They have been set up like bowling
pins, believing all the lies about the "superior"
American economy.
CHICAGO - Delphi Corp. on Monday
posted a second-quarter loss on production cuts by major
customer General Motors Corp. and said it may have to
file for bankruptcy if it cannot reduce high wage and
benefit costs.
The largest U.S. auto parts supplier,
whose shares fell nearly 14 percent, said it expects
continued year-over-year declines in North American
vehicle production this quarter, hurting revenue and
margins.
"Clearly Delphi is under pressure here, and their
threat (of bankruptcy) is a real threat," said
Tim Ghriskey, chief investment officer for Solaris Asset
Management. "Their first order of business is to
try to renegotiate some of those (union) deals and terms
to ensure the viability of the U.S. business."
Delphi reported a net loss of $338
million, or 60 cents per share, compared with year-earlier
net income of $143 million, or 25 cents per share.
Excluding $49 million of restructuring charges, Delphi
reported a loss of 52 cents per share, missing by a
penny the forecast from analysts polled by Reuters Estimates.
Revenue fell to $7 billion from $7.5 billion. An
18 percent decline in sales to GM more than offset growth
of 6 percent in other revenue to about $3.6 billion,
Delphi said.
Besides lower production from GM, high commodity costs
and increasing costs for pension and health care benefits
contributed to the quarterly loss, Delphi said. The
company's non-GM business outside the United States
performed well.
Delphi, which has struggled to become
profitable since GM spun it off in 1999, is in talks
with the world's largest automaker and the United Auto
Workers union about cutting high U.S. wage and benefit
costs to try to avoid bankruptcy.
The company wants the right
to close underperforming plants and cut about 4,000
inactive union workers, although the discussions include
the entire U.S. work force, acting Chief Financial
Officer John Sheehan told Reuters.
"We are not able to fix, sell or close a facility
without the agreement of the union," Sheehan said.
"We want to be able to take the actions that a
management team needs to take in response to a changing
industry environment."
GM LEGACY
Delphi has sufficient liquidity to finance its operations
during the period of its discussions with the unions
and GM, Sheehan said.
Delphi said it would consider
a Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization of U.S. operations
if it cannot cut wages and benefits.In
a quarterly regulatory filing, the company said a change
in U.S. bankruptcy law should reduce the flexibility
of corporations that file for bankruptcy protection
after Oct. 17.
Troy, Michigan-based Delphi inherited union contracts
from GM requiring it to pay wages at the much higher
automaker level, putting it at a competitive disadvantage
against other parts companies.
The company has about 48,690 U.S. employees, including
34,000 unionized hourly workers. The UAW represents
about 24,800 of the union workers. [...]
Shares of Delphi were down 68 cents, or 13.7 percent,
at $4.28 in morning New York Stock Exchange trade. Through
Friday, the stock was off 45 percent for 2005,
while the Standard & Poor's 500 index was up about
1.2 percent.
Notice also that the strongest
sector was retailing - people spending money they
shouldn't on new cars, having been lured by incentives
for 2005 models that have hurt profits for auto companies
while calling into question the sales for 2006 models
which will be introduced soon.
The sale of new cars is used as proof that the US economy
is still growing, yet the two biggest suppliers to the
two big auto manufacturers in the US, GM and Ford, are
currently in severe financial difficulty...
Delphi, Visteon Blame Second-Quarter Losses on Labor Costs
and Production Cuts
By Dee-Ann Durbin, AP Auto
Writer
Monday August 8, 4:52 pm ET
DETROIT -- The nation's biggest
auto-parts suppliers reported second-quarter losses
Monday, citing high labor costs and production cuts
by ailing domestic automakers. Delphi Corp. said it's
considering bankruptcy, but Visteon Corp.'s outlook
is brighter as it approaches a major restructuring next
month. [...]
Delphi, which was spun off from General Motors Corp.
in 1999, said it's trying to work out a restructuring
plan with GM and the United Auto Workers union, but
bankruptcy is an option if those talks fail. [...]
No. 2 U.S. supplier Visteon said it expects to report
a second-quarter loss of $1.2 billion after writing
down the value of assets being transferred to former
parent Ford Motor Co. The company,
based near Detroit in Van Buren Township, is sending
24 unprofitable facilities back to Ford in a restructuring
deal expected to conclude Sept. 30. [...]
Both companies said production cuts at GM and Ford
hurt their bottom line. GM slashed production by 11
percent between January and June and plans a 9 percent
cut in the third quarter, while Ford cut production
by 7 percent in the first half and plans a 2 percent
cut in the third quarter. Ford
accounts for 64 percent of Visteon's business, while
GM makes up half of Delphi's sales.
Delphi and Visteon also blamed their losses on high
labor costs set by the automakers before the spin-offs.
The number of UAW-covered hourly
employees at Visteon will drop from 17,400 to 5,000
once the restructuring is completed, but Delphi remains
saddled with high labor costs until 2007, when GM renegotiates
its contract with the UAW, which represents about 25,000
Delphi hourly workers.
Miller said Delphi is paying $130,000 per hourly worker
in annual wages and benefits. In the second quarter,
he said, Delphi spent more than $100 million for idled
hourly workers who are still entitled to some pay.
"We can no longer wait to address this issue,"
Delphi's acting chief financial officer John Sheehan
said. "Our business outside of the U.S. is going
very well, and non-GM business is growing. This high
U.S. legacy cost structure is overtaking the good side
of our company."
GM spokeswoman Toni Simonetti said GM is reviewing
Delphi's proposed restructuring plan, which would require
some financial assistance from GM. Miller
wouldn't say how much Delphi is seeking from GM, which
lost $286 million in the second quarter.
"We will review the proposal that they submitted
to us and will make a determination of what, if any,
participation in their restructuring would be in the
best interest of GM and our shareholders," Simonetti
said. [...]
Himanshu Patel, an analyst with J.P. Morgan Securities
Inc., said in a note to investors that Delphi's comments
could be construed as a veiled threat to GM and the
UAW.
"This is fairly explicit language," he said.
But Patel believes the chances of a bankruptcy aren't
high because it is in the best interest of GM and the
UAW to work out a deal. If Delphi
declares bankruptcy, GM would be forced to absorb some
of Delphi's pension costs and would likely have to pay
higher prices for parts. UAW retirees also would likely
see a major reduction in their benefits, Patel said.
[...]
Comment: 12,400
UAW employees at Visteon are in big trouble, and and
a similar process is likely to unfold at Delphi before
the changes in bankruptcy laws take effect in October
of this year. In the end, the losers will be the hourly
employees - i.e. the average American taxpayer. Note
also the comment about how if Delphi declares bankruptcy,
UAW retirees would likely see major reductions in their
benefits. We have already seen this very problem strike
the airline industry. Obviously, despite all the upbeat
talk from Bush and the Neocons, all is not
well with the US economy...
LONDON, Aug. 9 (Xinhuanet)
-- Warnings of a possible terrorist
attack in Saudi Arabia coupled with concerns about Iran's
resumption of its nuclear program helped push crude prices
to nominal records, with analysts fearing the per
barrel price could soon breach 65-US dollar mark, the
Financial Times reported Tuesday.
Crude futures in New York on
Monday approached 64-dollar a barrel and US gasoline futures
reached highs as an already-tight market reacted to warnings
from the United States, Britain and Australia of potential
attacks in Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest oil producer.
Britain talked of "credible reports"
that terrorists were in the "final stages of planning
attacks" in the kingdom, a warning that was echoed
by the Australian government and came as the United States
closed its missions in Saudi Arabia, also citing a terrorist
threat.
Comment: Oil prices
are going up because of "credible reports" and
"warnings" from those always reliable intelligence
agencies of the US, Britain, and Australia. And we are
completely sincere when we say these agencies are reliable:
you can't believe anything they say. How much more reliable
could they be?
So here we see one of the ways that
the financial markets are manipulated: through the "leaking"
of warnings and "credible reports". In the aftermath,
the markets do their predictable dance, and someone out
there is making big bucks.
The futures market has been driven higher by one of
the worst sequences of refinery stoppages in years.
Prices were also lifted by Iran's resumption of nuclear
activities at a uranium conversion plant in Isfahan --
a move that brings Tehran closer to threatened United
Nations sanctions.
The International Atomic Energy Agency will hold an
emergency meeting of its board of governors on Tuesday
to discuss Iran's decision.
Oil traders fear Iran's resumption of its nuclear program
could prompt the European Union to back US calls for sanctions
against the second-biggest oil producer in the Organisation
of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.
Meanwhile, lack of spare capacity means
refineries could face difficulties meeting global oil
demand this winter.
The International Energy Agency, the industrial countries'
energy watchdog, has forecast that oil consumption will
reach 85.9-million barrels a day in the fourth quarter,
up from the current 83.7 million.
Comment:
Rising oil prices should make Mike Ruppert rejoice. He
thinks it should go up to $180 a barrel. Dick Cheney would
probably love to see that price, too.
Mike Ruppert wrote that Dick Cheney was behind 9/11,
then he played Pied Piper to lead a portion of the 9/11
skeptics movement to Peak Oil. We don't know if Cheney
has given Ruppert the key to Hamlinburtin yet, but we
imagine it'll come. And Ruppert will have earned it.
The Bush administration
and its Neocons have shot themselves in the foot big
time if they thought they could use Iraq to reduce US
dependence on Saudi Arabia. If you want to understand
the problem, look at it this way. The world produces
about 80 million barrels of petroleum every day. But
only a fraction of that is exported, since producing
countries use a lot of it at home.
Rather than being marginalized, Saudi Arabia has entered
a new economic golden age. This was not what the Neocons
were going for.
Of course, a lot of the problem is at home. The United
States is an oil hog. Sorry to be blunt. But these were
the top oil consuming countries in 2004, below. The
United States gobbles up a fourth of all the petroleum
produced every year, even though it only has about 5
percent of the world's population.
2004 Top Petroleum Consumers:
1. United States 20.5
2. China 6.5
3. Japan 5.4
4. Germany 2.6
5. Russia 2.6
6. India 2.3
7. Canada 2.3
8. Brazil 2.2
9. South Korea 2.1
10. France 2.0
Some of the consumers have their own sources of petroleum,
so the top importers is a slightly different list:
1. United States 11.8
2. Japan 5.3
3. China 2.9
4. Germany 2.5
5. South Korea 2.1
6. France 2.0
7. Italy 1.7
8. Spain 1.6
9. India 1.5
10. Taiwan 1.0
So, since we like to drive rather than take the train,
and since we don't really care about things like gas
mileage or efficient use of energy, where are we going
to get all the petroleum, since we produce less than
half of what we use?
Meet the biggest oil exporters. You can think about
them as your friends or your suppliers (in another context).
In short, they are people you have put yourself in the
position of desperately needing. The US doesn't necessarily
get petroleum directly from these countries. But since
there is just one, world-wide, petroleum market, that
doesn't matter. We still depend indirectly on what they
produce.
2004 top petroleum exporters (millions of barrels a
day):
Saudi Arabia is actually producing 9 million barrels
a day, of the 80 million total in the world, or 11 percent.
It has a small population and doesn't use much itself,
so it can export almost all of it. (Russia produces
about as much as Saudi Arabia, but uses much more).
Since the Bush administration mismanaged Iraq into
chaos, it is producing far below its capacity. Cheney
thought it would be doing 3 million barrels a day by
now, but it is only managing half that, because of sabotage.
If it was calm and invested billions in overhauls, it
could maybe produce 5 million barrels a day five years
out. Maybe 20 years out it could match what Saudi Arabia
and Russia do today. But since its population is growing
quickly and it will want to industrialize, it will probably
use a lot of its petroleum in-country.
That is, there is no prospect in my lifetime of Saudi
Arabia being less than indispensable to the United States
in the global energy market.
If you don't like the dependency, here are your present
options:
Put in wind generators like crazy. They're just about
competitive at the current $60 a barrel price, and would
help national security. They also make a lot of noise
(or at least give off vibrations) and are annoying,
and if you put them in the wrong place they'll kill
a lot of birds.
Put in nuclear power plants. They don't produce greenhouse
gases and are economically viable (especially if you
factor in the cost of global warming otherwise, and
of national security). They also sometimes melt down
and they produce a byproduct that can be used to make
very big bombs, and their waste is toxic and lasts thousands
of years.
Go to solar panels , as Germany and Japan are doing,
and now California. On the surface, solar is more expensive
than fossil fuels (at the moment, ten times more expensive).
Few are going to volunteer to pay a $1000 for something
they can get for $100. But if you factor in the costs
of global warming, who knows? Also the production of
photovoltaic cells involves the use of some pretty toxic
materials, which will become a pollution issue eventually.
Conserve. You could probably cut US consumption to
13 million barrels a day if you made the right laws,
about gas efficiency, insulation of buildings, etc.
There would be a cost, but in the medium run you'd save
your money and be less dependent.
That's about it as far as I can see. Hydrogen is a
dream twenty years off at least. [Update: See below
about a possibility Israeli scientists have come up
with that may shorten the wait.] Oil is still about
the cheapest way to power modern life, and in economics
cheapness trumps. For all the noise about alternative
energy, only 6.4 percent of US energy was provided by
them last year; it may rise to 6.7 this year. The energy
bill passed by Congress does almost nothing to help,
and probably hurts.
Despite Americans' talk about not liking to be dependent
on the Saudis, their actual policies (and certainly
those of the Bush administration) are calculated to
increase the dependency, not lessen it.
Remember that the next time you complain about those
spreading Wahhabi-influenced madrasahs. You might as
well complain about cows while eating ice cream.
BEIJING, Aug. 9 --
China would not adjust the yuan's exchange rate any further
in the next three to six months while it assessed the
impact of last month's 2.1 percent revaluation, a senior
economist said.
“Policymakers will observe the effects of the
revaluation on the economy and the degree to which it
is digested. This is an adjustment period,” said
Ba Shusong, a vice director with the State Council's Development
Research Center.
“Exchange rate reform will affect trade, employment,
farm products, and the overall economy. Companies and
financial institutions all need time to adjust,”
Ba said in a weekend interview with the Shanghai Securities
News.
The Development Research Center advises the State Council,
China's Cabinet, on economic policy.
Ba said the long-awaited revaluation, which also scrapped
the yuan's peg to the dollar in favor of an exchange rate
managed with reference to a currency basket, would make
it easier for the central bank to fight speculators betting
on further appreciation.
“Under the floating exchange rate system, the
initiative to take on speculators is in the hands of the
central bank, while under the fixed exchange rate system,
the initiative is actually in the hands of speculative
capital,” Ba said.
The modest size of the revaluation had not given speculators
much of a profit, while the new managed float system introduced
uncertainty by allowing the yuan to move up or down, Ba
said.
The revaluation would help bring about an overall balance
in China's trade account, but would have only a very small
effect on China's huge surplus with the United States,
Ba said.
By DAVID BAUDER
AP Television Writer
Mon Aug 8,11:47 AM ET
NEW YORK - Peter Jennings, the
urbane, Canadian-born broadcaster who delivered the
news to Americans each night in five separate decades,
died Sunday. He was 67.
Jennings, who announced in April that he had lung cancer,
died at his New York home, ABC News President David
Westin said late Sunday.
"Peter has been our colleague, our friend, and
our leader in so many ways. None of us will be the same
without him," Westin said.
With Tom Brokaw and Dan Rather,
Jennings was part of a triumvirate that dominated network
news for more than two decades, through the birth of
cable news and the Internet. His smooth delivery
and years of international reporting experience made
him particularly popular among urban dwellers. [...]
Jennings was the face of ABC News whenever a big story
broke. He logged more than 60 hours on the air during
the week of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, offering
a soothing sense of continuity during a troubled time.
[...]
Jennings' announcement four months ago that the longtime
smoker would begin treatment for lung cancer came as
a shock.
"I will continue to do the broadcast," he
said, his voice husky, in a taped message that night.
"On good days, my voice will not always be like
this."
But although Jennings occasionally came to the office
between chemotherapy treatments, he never again appeared
on the air. [...]
Jennings returned to the evening news a decade after
his unceremonious departure. In 1978, ABC renamed its
broadcast "World News Tonight," and instituted
a three-person anchor team: Frank Reynolds based in
Washington, Max Robinson from Chicago and Jennings,
by then ABC's chief foreign correspondent, from London.
Following Reynolds' death from cancer,
ABC abandoned the multi-anchor format and Jennings became
sole anchor on Sept. 5, 1983. Brokaw became solo anchor
at NBC just days later. Rather had taken the CBS anchor
job in 1981.
Starting in 1986, Jennings began a decade on top of
the ratings. His international experience served him
well explaining stories like the collapse of European
communism, the first Gulf War and the terrorist bombing
of an airplane over Lockerbie, Scotland. He took pride
that "World News Tonight," as its name suggested,
took a more worldly view than its rivals. Fans responded
to his smart, controlled style. [...]
With Americans looking more inward in the mid to late-1990s,
NBC's Tom Brokaw surpassed Jennings in the ratings.
ABC was still a close No. 2, however. When
Brokaw stepped down in December 2004, followed shortly
by Rather, ABC began an advertising campaign stressing
Jennings' experience - an ironic twist given how his
ABC News career began.
But ABC was
never able to learn whether Jennings could take advantage
of his role as an elder statesman; his cancer diagnosis
came only a month after Rather left the anchor chair.
[...]
Jennings also
led a documentary team at ABC News, which struck a chord
in 2000 with the high-rated spiritual special "The
Search for Jesus." [...]
Comment: Jennings
also did a recent special
on the UFO phenomenon. It is a bit curious that
one month after the "Rather Scandal" and the
departure of Tom Brokaw from NBC, the one remaining
"superanchor" who did not intend to step down
is diagnosed with lung cancer...
Last Updated Mon, 08 Aug 2005
14:04:28 EDT
CBC Arts
After running a negative
review of John Irving's latest novel, Until I Find You,
the Washington Post has issued an apology.
The paper says reviewer Marianne Wiggins failed to disclose
a previous relationship with the author of The World According
to Garp, The Cider House Rules and A Prayer for Owen Meany.
Wiggins, a fellow novelist and a U.S. National Book Award
finalist, isn't the only one who panned Irving's latest.
For instance, the reviewer for the New York Times
called Until I Find You "hideously overstuffed"
and said it "feels as though it had been written
on automatic pilot."
On July 10, the Washington Post published the
review of the Irving novel in which Wiggins called the
824-page work a "mass of lazy, unrefined writing."
"The story reads as if Irving woke from a recurring
nightmare and started dictating compulsively," she
wrote.
In an Editor's Note Sunday, the paper
said: "Had we known that Irving had dedicated one
of his earlier novels (A Son of the Circus) to Marianne
Wiggins' ex-husband, Salman Rushdie, and had we known
that Irving and Wiggins had socialized with each other
in the past, we would not have made the assignment. ...
We apologize to our readers for this misstep."
The paper also said it requires critics to disclose "any
contact, friendly or otherwise" with the author of
the book they are to review.
Irving had issued a complaint to the newspaper, noting
his personal relationship with Wiggins, who divorced his
longtime friend Rushdie in 1993 after a five-year marriage.
Comment:
Isn't it nice of the Washington Post to take
issues of conflict of interest so seriously. We have a
question, though. How many of the Post's reporters, columnists,
and editors socialise with the neocons, with Zionist lobbyists,
with heavy donors to either of the two corporatist US
political parties, or with members of the Bush administration?
The bizarre
report by Jim Miklaszewski of NBC news that US military
sources are saying Iran is the source of more sophisticated
bombs used by Sunni Arab guerrillas in Iraq seems so
unbelievable because it is. Poor Jim is the victim of
a high-level Department of Defense black psy-ops operation
(or perhaps such an operation has been supplied by a
sub-contractor). You wonder if it is Doug Feith's parting
gift to the American people-- laying the groundwork
for a war with Iran.
This is the give-away sentence:
' Intelligence officials believe the high-explosives
were shipped into Iraq by the Iranian Revolutionary
guard or the terrorist group Hezbollah, but are convinced
it could not have happened without the full consent
of the Iranian government.
Earlier in the article it was alleged that the supposedly
captured shipment came from northeastern Iran. Yet by
this later paragraph, the US military intelligence guys
can't tell whether it came from the west or the east,
or whether it came from Iran or Hizbullah. But if you
don't know whether something comes from Lebanon or Iran,
then you really don't know where it came from at all,
do you? Lebanon and Iran are not like each other. One
speaks Persian, the other Arabic. Why, they aren't even
close to one another.
Let's look at a map.
Do you notice how Hizbullah (Hezbollah), which is Shiite,
is in southern Lebanon, way over in the west of the
map, on the Mediterranean? Do you notice how northeastern
Iran (also Shiite) is way over to the east of the map,
near the Caspian sea? Do you notice how there isn't
any way to get from Lebanon to Iran except through Syria
and then Turkey? Do you notice how there isn't any way
to get from Lebanon to Iraq except via Syria or Syria-and-Jordan?
(You could fly, but if the Lebanese government is permitting
air transport of 500 pound bombs out of Beirut, we have
other problems than just some Iraqi arms smuggling).
Do you notice how there are 250,000 tons of missing
munitions in Iraq, such that it is not necessary for
the Baath military intelligence to import very many
from elsewhere?
Do you notice how the US military has not captured
any Lebanese Hizbullah in the company of Sunni guerrillas
in Iraq? Do you notice how only the Baathist ex-Minister
of the Interior, Falah al-Naqib, an appointee of CIA
asset Iyad Allawi, ever alleged that he had captured
Lebanese Hizbullah in Iraq? (Do you notice how Allawi's
Minister of Defense, Baathist Hazem Shaalan, charged
that Iran was Iraq's number one enemy when he was briefly
in power last year?)
Do you notice how there are two, count them, two, Iraqi
organizations called "Hezbollah" (which just
means "party of God") and how Americans frequently
are confused and think these are the Lebanese party,
which they are not?
Do you notice how the US military has not captured
any Iranians in the Sunni Arab provinces of Anbar, Salahuddin,
etc.? (Occasionally Iranian pilgrims have been captured
in Shiite areas, where they threw in with Shiite militants.)
Do you notice how the US military has captured lots
of Sunni Saudis, Jordanians, Egyptians, Sudanese, etc.?
Do you notice how the Sunni guerrillas talk
nasty about the Shiites and blow them up and slit
their throats? Do you notice how some people are depending
on you not to know that radical Shiites and extremist
Sunnis don't like each other?
Do you notice how the elected (Shiite) Iraqi government
that the guerrillas are trying to kill has excellent
relations with (Shiite) Iran?
Do you notice how the story of Iranian agents coming
in through Kurdistan looks a lot like the story the
FBI
had accused spy Larry Franklin feed AIPAC to see
if they would run off to the Israeli embassy with it?
Is it a counter-sting?
Be afraid when you begin to see US government agencies
themselves handing out this highly suspect sort of information
to major news networks. It means that the sting on the
American people has moved from the smoke-filled back
rooms to some higher operational level.
Or maybe trial balloons are being floated to see how
gullible we are.
PARIS, Aug 5 (AFP)
- The United States has "enormous scepticism"
over Europe's approach to Iran's nuclear programme, even
if it has publicly backed the efforts, a French diplomat
said Friday.
"I have to say that the United States has followed
our negotiations with enormous scepticism, thinking that
it will lead nowhere and that we are being duped by the
Iranians," said the diplomat, who was briefing journalists
on condition of anonymity Britain, France and Germany
welcomed US President George W Bush's reserved support
earlier this year of the EU initiative to have Iran drop
parts of its nuclear programme that could be used for
military purposes in exchange for trade and security cooperation
deals.
"That made our job easier and allowed us to show
the Iranians that we had not a backing of the Americans
but an understanding of the task," the diplomat said.
"That hasn't stopped the Americans continuing to
watch us with deep scepticism. We don't consult them as
such, but we are telling the Americans what direction
we're going in without providing details on all of our
positions," he said.
The officials was speaking after Britain, France and
Germany made a package of offers to Iran promising accords
in various areas if it agreed to limits that would guarantee
its nuclear programme could be used for exclusively civilian
ends.
Comment:
This approach also allows the US to keeps its hands clean
and remain free to find fault with any future agreement,
should agreement be reached.
By ROBERT BURNS
AP Military Writer
Mon Aug 8, 3:59 PM ET
WASHINGTON - Anticipating a new
burst of insurgent violence, the
Pentagon plans to expand the U.S. force in Iraq to improve
security for a planned October referendum and a December
election.
Although much public attention has
been focused recently on the prospect of reducing U.S.
forces next spring and summer, defense officials foresee
the likelihood of first increasing troop levels.
Lawrence Di Rita, spokesman for Defense Secretary Donald
H. Rumsfeld, noted Monday that troop levels were raised
last January during Iraq's first elections, and then
returned to the current level of about 138,000 several
weeks later.
"It's perfectly plausible to assume we'll do the
same thing for this election," he said, while stressing
that no decisions had been made.
Di Rita said he did not know how many extra troops
might be needed during the referendum and election period.
Other officials have said that once the election period
has passed and the troop total recedes to the 138,000
level, a further reduction in the range of 20,000 to
30,000 is possible next spring and summer. That
could change, however, if the insurgency intensifies
or an insufficient number of U.S.-trained Iraqi security
forces prove themselves battle ready.
Last January the U.S. troop level rose as high as 160,000.
This was accomplished mainly by overlapping some units
arriving in Iraq to begin a one-year tour with those
who were ending their yearlong tours. In
at least one case an Army brigade was kept a little
longer than its scheduled 12 months in Iraq, and Di
Rita said he could not rule out this happening again
this fall, although the intention is to avoid tours
longer than 12 months.
"The units that are there have been told to expect
that," he said. "It's possible that your planned
rotation dates back to the U.S. will be affected by
the need to keep a higher level for a longer period
of time. They understand that."
Di Rita said commanders may also ask for volunteers
to serve extended tours.
Another possibility is that some U.S.-based troops
will be sent to Iraq to augment the force during the
election period. One unit called upon most frequently
for that kind of duty is the 82nd Airborne Division,
which currently is deploying a battalion to Afghanistan
to bolster security in advance of Sept. 18 elections
there.
Di Rita said no elements of the 82nd had been alerted
to prepare for similar duty in Iraq this fall.
U.S. commanders predict a need for extra troops this
fall in Iraq because the insurgents have tended to intensify
their attacks when key political milestones approached.
If a draft constitution is ready by Aug. 15, as intended,
then a national referendum on that charter is to be
held Oct. 15, followed by December elections based on
the constitution. [...]
Among the Army units scheduled to
deploy to Iraq in coming months is the 101st Airborne
Division, which was part of the original invasion force
in 2003 and returned home early in 2004, as well as
the 4th Infantry Division, which arrived in Iraq shortly
after the fall of Baghdad in April 2003. Those two divisions
have since been reorganized and now have four combat
brigades each, rather than three each.
Russian soldiers have
been staying in Uzbekistan for more than a month preparing
to take charge of the Khanabad airbase after the U.S.
troops withdrawal, Nezavisimaya Gazeta daily reported.
As the editor-in-chief of an Uzbek news agency Fergana
Daniil Kislov told the paper, “several hundreds
of Russian servicemen — presumably spetsnaz troops
of airborne commandos — remain at a former geological
exploration airbase near the military installation, wear
civilian clothes and try not to get in touch with local
people without urgent need”.
However, Uzbek diplomats and Russian Defense Ministry
officials neither confirmed nor dismissed the report,
but a military source that wished to remain anonymous
said in an interview with the daily that Russian troops
will oversee the handover of Karshi-Khanabad airbase that
has been used by the U.S. since the beginning of the war
in Afghanistan to oust the Taliban regime, which was accused
of harboring al Qaeda.
“Americans expected they would
stay there forever, and were setting aside a lot of funds
for the base infrastructure. Our task is to make them
hand the aerodrome — the runway, communications
and watch facilities — over to Uzbekistan upkeep,”
the source said.
Sources in the Russian Defense Ministry
have also confirmed the reports. One of them said that
after the Shanghai Cooperation Organization demanded U.S.
troops withdrawal from the former Soviet republic, China
immediately expressed interest in the base. Thus, Russian
troops had to rush to the country in order not to lose
their chances of taking control of an area that used to
belong to the USSR. “Uzbeks did not mind,”
he pointed out.
Khanabad used to be the second-largest airbase in the
Soviet Union, hosting strategic Tu-22MZ planes and Tu-95
heavy bombers during the invasion into Afghanistan.
Uzbekistan has imposed new limits on the U.S. use of
its Karshi-Khanabad air base, after Washington criticized
Uzbekistan’s bloody crackdown on anti-government
rioting in May that killed around 200 people according
to the official toll, though human rights activists say
up to 750 died.
Shortly afterwards the Shanghai Cooperation Organization,
a regional alliance led by China and Russia, called on
the U.S. to set a date for withdrawing forces from bases
in the former Soviet republics of Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan.
No official requests concerning base withdrawal, however,
have been voiced by the Uzbek government so far.
ROME (Reuters) - One
of the prime suspects in the failed July 21 bombings in
London told domestic and Italian investigators on Tuesday
that a bag packed with explosives and nails had been meant
to scare, not to kill.
Hamdi Issac was seized in Rome on July 29 after fleeing
London following the botched strike on the city's transport
system in which no one was hurt. The government charged
three fellow suspects in the attacks with attempted murder
on Monday.
Issac, also known as Osman Hussein, was questioned in
a Rome jail for three hours in the presence of British
investigators.
"He knew there were explosives, but it was just
to make noise, not to kill," Issac's lawyer, Antonietta
Sonnessa, told reporters after the questioning. "It
was just for show and was not intended to hurt anybody."
But Issac acknowledged that along with the explosives,
the rucksack he was carrying on the day of the attacks
also contained nails, she said.
The questioning was presided over by Rome magistrate
Domenico Miceli, who is due to hold an extradition hearing
on August 17. Sonnessa said five Britons were also present
during the interrogation.
Sonnessa has said Issac may be able to avoid extradition
due to proceedings against him in Italy, where he is suspected
of international terrorism and carrying false documents.
The July 21 attack came exactly two weeks after four
young British Muslim men killed themselves and 52 other
people with bombs on three underground trains and a bus
in London.
Italian police have said Issac is an Ethiopian national
who lived in Italy from 1991 to 1996 before moving to
Britain.
Comment:
How considerate of MI5 to only want to scare people.
By Sydney Morning Herald (Australia)
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 15:45:34 -0700
Environmentalists say Australia
is facing "the most serious genetic contamination
event" in its history, after the West Australian
government confirmed low levels of genetically modified
canola had been found in non-GM canola.
A spokeswoman for WA Agriculture Minister Kim Chance
said that tests had shown positive results of GM material
but samples had been sent overseas for further testing
and until more detailed results were confirmed no further
details could be released.
The latest test results come after GM material was
found during routine testing by the Australian Barley
Board in June of an export consignment of Victorian
canola seeds bound for Japan. About
0.01 per cent of the consignment contained the GM material.
It is believed the modification found in Victoria,
known as Topas 19/2 and developed by Bayer CropScience,
was also found in the WA sample tested.
Following Monday's announcement, Greenpeace Australia
campaigner Jeremy Tager said state governments must
now take immediate action to protect Australia's GM
free status.
"This is the most serious genetic
contamination event that Australia has ever faced and
the response from state governments in the coming days
will determine their commitment to upholding Australia's
(GM) free status," Mr Tager said.
"The WA and Victorian governments have instituted
rigorous testing.
"They are taking this issue extremely seriously
but the lack of any response from the NSW and South
Australian governments is disturbing.
"States that have not conducted testing, or taken
steps to determine if Topas is a problem in their agricultural
areas, are putting Australian farmers and our (GM) free
status at risk."
WA's Agriculture Minister Kim Chance said he would
like to see legislation put in place at a national level
to govern liability for GM contamination. [...]
Comment: GM
crops are like a virus. It seems they may be intended
to spread to non-GM fields around the world, forcing
all farmers to purchase their seeds each year from the
psychopathic corporations that engineer them. Think
about what would happen if certain crops became irreparably
contaminated with the GM variety across the globe, and
the corporation that produces them was, say, wiped off
the face of the earth by a natural disaster...
Leo Cendrowicz in Brussels
The Guardian
Tuesday August 9, 2005
The European commission yesterday
cleared imports of genetically modified maize produced
by the US biotechnology firm Monsanto for use as animal
feed.
The commission granted Monsanto a 10-year licence to
export the maize.
This is the third GM product to be approved by the
EU since the end of its six-year moratorium in April
last year, and it comes after a tortuous authorisation
process. EU governments and environmental activists
have consistently questioned the safety of the maize,
known as MON 863.
The maize was approved by the
commission in spite of opposition from more than half
of the EU's 25 governments.When
EU environment ministers were asked to vote on the maize
at a meeting in Luxembourg in June, 14 opposed, four
abstained, and only seven - including Britain - backed
the plans.
In September, EU health ministers
will vote on whether to clear the same maize for human
consumption. Environmental groups argue that
GM crops have not been proved to be safe for human consumption
and may contaminate other crops, but the commission
insisted the maize was subject to "a rigorous pre-market
risk assessment".
Comment: Given
the opposition in the EU to GM crops, and the fact that
those crops were nevertheless approved, we can only
conclude that GM crops are being forced on the population
against the wishes of the people and national governments.
The September vote will no doubt result in another approval
for human consumption. It is also interesting that as
smoking is banned in more and more EU countries due
to the "health risks", GM crops are being
mysteriously approved even though no one really knows
what long-term effects such engineered food products
will have on the health of the people.
By Jeff Franks, Reuters
Updated: 08/04/05 12:38 PM EDT
HOUSTON - Commander Eileen Collins
said astronauts on shuttle Discovery had seen widespread
environmental destruction on Earth and warned on Thursday
that greater care was needed to protect natural resources.
Her comments came as NASA pondered whether to send
astronauts out on an extra spacewalk to repair additional
heat-protection damage on the first shuttle mission
since the 2003 Columbia disaster.
Discovery is linked with the International Space Station
and orbiting 220 miles above the Earth.
"Sometimes you can see how there
is erosion, and you can see how there is deforestation.
It's very widespread in some parts of the world,"
Collins said in a conversation from space with Japanese
officials in Tokyo, including Prime Minister Junichiro
Koizumi.
"We would like to see, from the astronauts' point
of view, people take good care of the Earth and replace
the resources that have been used," said Collins,
who was standing with Japanese astronaut Soichi Noguchi
in front of a Japanese flag and holding a colorful fan.
Collins, flying her fourth shuttle mission, said the
view from space made clear that Earth's atmosphere must
be protected, too.
"The atmosphere almost looks like an eggshell
on an egg, it's so very thin," she said. "We
know that we don't have much air, we need to protect
what we have." [...]
CALGARY, Alberta, Aug.
8 (UPI) -- Meteor impacts are often regarded as killers
and the cause of mass extinctions on Earth, but researchers
say meteors might have helped early life.
Canadian geologists reported Monday there's a chance
the heavy bombardment of Earth by meteors during the planet's
youth actually spurred early life on our planet.
A study of the Haughton Impact Crater on Devon Island,
in the Canadian Arctic, has revealed some very life-friendly
features at ground zero, researchers said. Those include
hydrothermal systems, blasted rocks that are easier for
microbes to inhabit, plus a protected basin created by
the crater itself.
If the theory is correct, the scientists say impact craters
could represent some of the best sites to look for signs
of past or present life on Mars and other planets.
The study was presented Monday during a presentation
on the biological effects of impacts at Earth System Processes
2, a meeting co-convened by the Geological Society of
America and Geological Association of Canada in Calgary,
Alberta, Canada.
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug
9 (Bernama) -- A moderate earthquake measuring 5.4 on
the Richter scale occurred in the Nicobar Island, Indonesia
at 7.23pm Tuesday, according to a statement by the Malaysian
Meteorological Service.
The statement said the centre of the earthquake was located
232km from Banda Aceh and 913km Northwest of Kuala Lumpur,
at co-ordinates 7.5 North, 94.7 East.
The department said based on its location and magnitude,
the earthquake was not expected to generate a tsunami
that could affect the coasts of Malaysia.
Striking
observations of the effects of Hurricane Ivan –
which swept across the Atlantic in 2004 – reveals
the 100-foot wave which ended the movie The Perfect
Storm were no cinematic exaggeration. And new meteorological
predictions warn that 2005 may be a bumper year for
North Atlantic hurricanes.
Sensors resting at 60 and 90-metre depths in the Gulf
of Mexico, off Mississippi, US, measured one wave at
91 feet (28 metres) high and half a dozen waves higher
than 50 feet as Ivan passed directly over the waters.
Yet even those impressive measurements missed the peak
of the storm, says Bill Teague at the US Naval Research
Laboratory branch in Mississippi. At
the peak of the Category 4 storm, when sustained winds
roared at 140 miles per hour (225 km/hour), he estimates
waves reached 130 feet (40 metres).
Hurricane winds whip up high waves over the open ocean,
but their heights are notoriously hard to measure because
the rough seas inevitably rip the standard buoy instruments
loose from their moorings before the peak of the storm.
Barnacle-like sensors
Waves up to 80 feet (24 metres) high have hit offshore
oil rigs, but operators thought these were isolated
"rogue" waves. But Teague told New Scientist
the new measurements suggest that "what's been
called a rogue wave may be fairly common in intense
storms".
The group used novel sensors that stick like barnacles
to the sea floor – allowing them to survive Ivan’s
fury – to measure wave height by monitoring water
pressure. However, each of the six sensors monitored
wave height for only 512 seconds each eight hours, so
they missed the peak of the storm.
Meanwhile, the US National Weather
Service declared on 2 August that 2005’s hurricane
season would be “extremely active”.
After recording seven tropical storms in the North Atlantic
in June and July, the agency predicts 11 to 14 more
storms will develop through to November – giving
a total of 18 to 21 during the season. A total of 9
to 11 are expected to reach hurricane strength. On average
there are 10 tropical storms and six hurricanes in the
season.
A “vastly larger”
number of people than thought may abuse cocaine, suggest
the results of a study measuring a breakdown product
of the illegal drug in an Italian river.
Levels of a cocaine residue excreted in human urine
were measured in the River Po, Italy’s largest
river. The river has a catchment basin for about five-million
people, with major cities like Turin and Milan situated
in the valley.
The equivalent of about 4 kilograms of cocaine flowed
in the river each day, say the researchers from Mario
Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan,
and the University of Insubria in Varese.
The analysis indicates that
at least 40,000 packets of the drug are snorted each
day – 80 times more than the official estimate
of just 15,000 doses taken per month by people living
in the area. If the study’s estimates are
true, a staggering $150 million in street value of cocaine
is dealt each year in the valley, say the researchers.
[...]
The high estimate of cocaine use is still likely to
be too low, believe the researchers. This is because
some of the cocaine and its metabolites are likely to
be lost or degraded before they had reached the sampling
sites.
The team thinks panicked traffickers hastily flushing
their goods down the toilet is “highly unlikely”
to contribute to their estimates, which are based on
multiple samplings. Any dumping of cocaine would be
picked up by a rise in the cocaine to benzoylecgonine
ratio.
Local trends [...]
HIDDEN files, cover-ups
and pressure on witnesses to "forget" the UFOs
they say they saw – these are the Queensland X-Files.
Australian UFO Research Centre investigator Dominic McNamara
has spent two years uncovering restricted files from the
Federal Government's top-secret national archives.
For the first time, The Sunday Mail is able to disclose
three sightings previously marked classified and deemed
to be a matter of national security.
Mr McNamara said there was little doubt the files –
detailing UFO sightings between 1950 and 1970 –
were deliberately hidden or made difficult to find.
"We are under the impression that some files are
yet to be found or they are in something deeper that we
are never going to get a look at," he said.
Mr McNamara said Queensland had a spate of sightings
for which there did not seem to be much explanation.
"It's a bit of a hot spot," he said.
"The bureaucratic solution is to contain it, especially
if your mandate is to be able to explain what goes on
in the sky.
"There were a number of sightings in that time,
where there was something really strange going on in Queensland.
"The best evidence we have are the witnesses who
have risked their social lives, their career and their
sanity to come forward at a time when it was extremely
difficult to do so and make a report."
The engineer said there was too much unexplained activity
to simply discount extra-terrestrial life.
He said sightings tended to peak around the time humans
extended their push into the skies, with events such as
rocket launches or nuclear bombs.
Mr McNamara said a lot of people thought he was "mad"
and compared his work as a UFO investigator to that of
TV character Fox Mulder of The X-Files.
"It's hard for people to consider that there's such
a thing as alien life, but it's harder to accept that
their can't be any," he said.
The sightings include:
UNIDENTIFIED AIRCRAFT
WITNESSED by Harold Jackwitz at Wulkuraka, west of Ipswich,
on July 14, 1958, at 1.45pm. The object was seen by 12
members of a construction gang employed at the partly
built electric shunting and marshalling yards.
Mr Jackwitz, of North Ipswich, described the object as
round, silent and cloud-like, giving off light reflection,
solid in construction, but emitting no sound or any obvious
means of propulsion.
When seen, it was to the northwest and apart from one
period where it appeared to hover, the direction remained
constant until visual contact was lost.
Bruce Stephens, of Auchenflower in Brisbane, who was
at the location, made observations of the phenomenon through
his theodolite for about eight minutes.
He drew a detailed sketch.
Interrogators reported, "the possibility of it being
an aircraft is most unlikely . . . the observers gave
straightforward information, showed no tendency to embellish
and their details were identical".
No RAAF or civil aircraft was airborne or operating within
these confines at the time.
UNUSUAL SIGHTING
ROLAND Roberts, witnessed a UFO at Daunia Station, via
Nebo, near Mackay, on June 24, 1965, at 6.45pm.
"Saucer shape with silver dome top and black underneath
. . . with lights around the side of it brilliant bluish
white," Mr Roberts wrote.
He included a sketch of his sighting. He described the
object moving from southwest until it vanished in a northeast
direction.
"It had a constant red jet tail or slip stream at
the rear the colour did not vary," the report read.
"Never seen anything move as fast as the object observed."
Mr Roberts was a grazier at his homestead when he saw
the object, which he said "would have been between
30 to 50 feet (9m to 15m) across, could see no legs or
landing gear under the object".
Mr McNamara said there was great interest in this sighting
because there was a boat which made a similar UFO report
in Darwin.
FLYING OBJECT
POLICE officer Leslie Gray saw a UFO from his address
at Kedron in Brisbane on November 12, 1966, at 7.55pm.
Mr Gray, then 36, said he was watching Russian satellites
from his back yard with his family when a slightly illuminated
boomerang-shaped object travelled overhead.
"I said to the children, come and look and try and
remember what you've seen because no one will ever believe
you," he told The Sunday Mail this week.
The sighting was confirmed by his then-wife Elva and
two children Robyn, then 13, and Stewart, then 5.
He described the object moving from the north to the
south before it disappeared about 30 degrees above the
horizon.
Mr Gray said lights in straight lines covered the object
and there was a faint glow outlining the whole object,
giving the impression of a brighter light above it.
"I thought no one's going to believe me, but I would
like to get it recorded," he said.
No aircraft were reported as being in the area.
"Being a policeman I knew that you don't ring the
police and talk about things like that, so I called a
friend in the air force," he said.
Mr Gray said he was interviewed soon after he reported
it, but "he was the most uninterested person I have
ever met and thought I was crazy," he said.
"I haven't heard a thing since."
Mr Gray said a newspaper article appeared soon after
about a banana-shaped object burnt into the ground in
Victoria.
Mrs Gray said it had been hard to convince others.
"People would brush you off, saying you've been
drinking, but we'll never forget it."
• All documents obtained from the National Archives
of Australia.
Australian UFO Research Network Sightings Hotline: 1800
772 288.
A photo of two peculiar dragon-shaped objects
taken from a plane flying over Tibet’s Himalayas
piqued many users’ interest when displayed on a
Chinese website. The photographer is an amateur.
On June 22, 2004, the photographer went to Tibet’s
Amdo region to attend the Qinghai-to-Xizang Railroad laying
ceremony, and then took a plane from Lhasa to fly back
inland. When flying over the Himalaya’s, he accidentally
caught these two "dragons" in a picture that
he took. He called these two objects "the Tibet dragons."
Looking at the photo, these two objects appear to have
the characteristics of crawling creatures: The bodies
seem to be covered by scales, the backs have spine-like
protuberances, and also they have gradually thinning rear
ends. Although the photo caught only a portion of the
entire scene, it was sufficient create the appearance
of two gigantic dragons flying in the clouds.
This photo, shown on some websites such as post.baidu.com
and other forums, aroused the website visitors’
curiosity. One person commented, “No wonder that
China is the homeland of the dragon! Nature is truly mysterious
and powerful, it can always produce spectacular sights
beyond people's expectations.”
“Is it really true? Is it possible there is an
ancient civilization that we don’t know about is
preserved in places that are sparsely populated?”
“It really looks like the dragons in fables, and
I really hope it is.”
Certainly, most website visitors hoped that someone could
confirm the authenticity of the dragons in the photo.
In Chinese fairy tales, the dragon is a kind of rare
heavenly creature. Fables say that it can conceal or reveal
itself. It ascends to heaven in the spring breeze and
dives and hides in deep water in the autumn wind. It can
promote clouds and bring about rain. It also became the
symbol of imperial authority later on; all emperors of
previous dynasties self-designated as dragons, utensils
were also decorated with dragons.
Culturally, the dragon is the Chinese ancestors' totem.
Nearly all races in China had fables and stories with
dragons as the main subject, such as dragon boat races,
the dragon lantern dance to celebrate holidays, sacrificial
offerings to the dragons to implore timely wind and rain
for good crops.
Whether this kind of creature really exists is still
an unsolved riddle. In the previous dynasties in China,
there had been many documents recording eyewitness accounts
of magical dragons. The most amazing events are the various
"falling dragons," dragons that suddenly fell
to the ground under peculiar circumstances, and were witnessed
by many. A relatively recent tale occurred in the puppet
Manchuria regime in August, 1944. A black dragon fell
to the ground at the Chen Family’s Weizi Village,
about 9.4 miles northwest of Zhaoyuan County, on the south
shore of the Mudan River (the old name of a section of
Songhua River) in Heilongjiang province. The black dragon
was on the verge of death. The eyewitness said that this
creature had a horn on its head, scales covering its body,
and had a strong fishy smell that attracted numerous flies.
The records from previous dynasties also mentioned the
connection between the emergence of these kinds of mysterious
creatures, “dragons,” and the transition of
dynasties on earth. The appearance of Tibet’s magical
dragon invites our curiosity and imagination.
LONDON - A lawyer in Cologne has
sprung to the defence of British holidaymakers fed up
with Germans using towels to bag all the best sun loungers
at European resorts.
"A British tourist would be quite within their
legal rights to ignore the reservation implied by the
towels if there is nobody there," Ralf Hocker,
34, told Monday's The Guardian newspaper.
In a book titled "The New Dictionary
of Popular Legal Errors" -- based on a study of
laws in Spain and Germany -- Hocker also says that bar-goers
who leave coats on chairs, and pedestrians who try to
claim parking spots for yet-to-arrive cars, are also
on shaky legal ground.
"The towel things is not such a big deal in Germany,
but I have to say that the stereotype is true -- German
people do reserve all the loungers," Hocker said,
upholding a timeless bit of British holiday folklore.
"It's also worth saying that it also infuriates
some German people."