As many of you know,
Signs of the Times is not supported by major funding like
many other news sites, and is not affiliated with any
government, political group, corporation, or news agency.
SOTT is financed by any donations we receive as well as
money out of our own pockets. The benefit of this setup
is that we do not have any sponsors that might introduce
unwanted bias into our work. The
obvious and major drawback is that we do not have the
funding to do all the things we would like to do for our
readers.
Almost one year ago, SOTT created the P3nt4gon Str!ke presentation, which has now been viewed by
well over 300,000,000 people worldwide, and is available
in nine different languages. Recently, we wrote and produced
the song You
Lied, performed by Away
With the Fairys. We also recorded our first ever podcast,
beginning a project which we had been trying to get off
the ground for over a year.
A
SOTT editor poses next to his computer
To produce the Signs page, we work very long days (often
upwards of 14-16 hours) without pay. We do it because
we love it, and because our readers often write to tell
us how they have benefited from our work. In order to
continue expanding our work and deepen our analysis and
understanding of our world, we need to enlarge our library.
There are many books we would like to have that we cannot
afford. With our increasing use of sound files and our
future projects that include video, we have and will continue
to incur higher bandwidth costs. As well, the Signs page
and related projects are created on several computers
which are each upwards of five years old. They are very
slow, increasingly unreliable, and won't support regular
podcasts and videos.
Unfortunately, we do not have the financial means to
purchase the books we need, much less new equipment. Current
donations only support our basic needs and living expenses.
In order to continue producing the Signs page, the podcast,
Flash presentations, and expand our operations further,
we need your support.
At the moment, we are preparing six Signs of the
Times Commentary books. These books are collections
of SOTT commentary grouped according to theme. They will
be available for sale soon, and any proceeds will go towards
helping to cover our increasing operating costs.
Our target, based on estimated costs for all the necessary
materials, upgrades, and operating costs for the coming
year is 28,000 euros.
--
Here's How You Can Help Signs of the Times --
Any donation you
can make will help us to continue to produce and improve
the Signs page.
If you donate 50 euros
(approximately US$60; click
here for current exchange rate), you will be a Bronze
Supporter.
Bronze
Supporters will receive a complementary
copy of the 911 Conspiracy Signs
Commentary book.
If you donate 100
euros, you will be a Silver
Supporter.
Silver
Supporters will receive a complementary copy
of 911 Conspiracy, US Freedom, and The
Media.
Donations
of 175 euros will qualify you as a Gold
Supporter.
Gold
Supporters will receive the entire set of
six commentary books: 911 Conspiracy, The
Human Condition, The Media, Religion,
US Freedom, and The Work.
Donations of 250 euros will
qualify you as a Platinum Supporter.
Platinum
Supporters will receive the entire set of
six commentary books: 911 Conspiracy, The
Human Condition, The Media, Religion,
US Freedom, and The Work. In addition,
they will receive one other book of their choice free
from our bookstore.
We have more projects like our podcast in
the works - but we need your
help to make them a reality!
Thank
you in advance from the editors and the rest of the team
at Signs of the Times!
Scientists say they
have been able to monitor people's thoughts via scans
of their brains.
Teams at University College London and University of
California in LA could tell what images people were looking
at or what sounds they were listening to.
The US team say their study proves brain scans do relate
to brain cell electrical activity.
The UK team say such research might help paralysed people
communicate, using a "thought-reading" computer.
In their Current Biology study, funded by the Wellcome
Trust, people were shown two different images at the
same time - a red stripy pattern in front of the right
eye and a blue stripy pattern in front of the left.
The volunteers wore special goggles which meant each
eye saw only what was put in front of it.
In that situation, the brain then switches awareness
between both images, sometimes seeing one image and sometimes
the other.
While people's attention switched between the two images,
the researchers used fMRI (functional Magnetic Resonance
Imaging) brain scanning to monitor activity in the visual
cortex.
It was found that focusing on the red or the blue patterns
led to specific, and noticeably different, patterns of
brain activity.
The fMRI scans could reliably be used to predict which
of the images the volunteer was looking at, the researchers
found.
Thought-provoking?
The US study, published in Science, took the
same theory and applied it to a more everyday example.
They used electrodes placed inside the
skull to monitor the responses of brain cells in the auditory
cortex of two surgical patients as they watched a clip
of "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly".
They used this data to accurately predict
the fMRI signals from the brains of another 11 healthy
patients who watched the clip while lying in a scanner.
Professor Itzhak Fried, the neurosurgeon
who led the research, said: "We were able to tell
one part of a scene from another, and we could tell one
type of sound from another."
Dr John-Dylan Haynes of the UCL Institute of Neurology,
who led the research, told the BBC News website: "What
we need to do now is create something like speech-recognition
software, and look at which parts of the brain are specifically
active in a person."
He said the study's findings proved
the principle that fMRI scans could "read thoughts",
but he said it was a very long way from creating a machine
which could read anyone's mind.
But Dr Haynes said: "We could tell
from a very limited subset of possible things the person
is possibly seeing."
"One day, someone will come up with a machine in
a baseball cap.
"Then it really could be helpful in everyday applications."
He added: "Our study represents an important but
very early stage step towards eventually building a machine
that can track a person's consciousness on a second-by-second
basis.
"These findings could be used to help develop or
improve devices that help paralyzed people communicate
through measurements of their brain activity.
But he stressed: "We are still a long way off from
developing a universal mind-reading machine."
Dr Fried said: "It has been known that different
areas of the temporal lobe are activated by faces, or
houses.
"This UCL finding means it is not necessary to use
strikingly different stimuli to tell what is activating
areas of the brain."
Comment:
The first thought that comes to mind in reading this article
is that if this is what is being made public, then they
are probably much further along in the military and intelligence
applications of this technology. We are well aware that
much research is condiucted in above top secret programmes
that are never made public. Floating a story such as this
serves as a form of disinformation because it allows the
average citizen to be made aware that such research is
underway but boxes in their awareness because"we
are still a long way off from developing a universal mind-reading
machine".
The second thought is that they are admitting that at
the present time "We could tell from a very limited
subset of possible things the person is possibly seeing."
Let's look at this admission.
If one were attempting to control an individual for a
certain task or within a limited range of ideas, then
being able to read "from a very limited subset of
possible things" is all you would need.
In the study, subjects were shown scenes from Sergio
Leone's epic masterpiece The Good, the Bad, and the
Ugly, an interesting choice of film from the point
of view that Leone eschewed the simple dichotomy of good/bad
and added a third term, "the Ugly". The Third
Force? Having established the reaction of one subject
to the scenes, the researchers were able to predict the
fMRI signals from others, not difficult in a mechanical
world of mechanical beings. But if they could do this
for a spaghetti western, couldn't they also do this for
a scene of a jetliner crashing into a tall office building?
Of course, reading reactions is one thing. Sending a
message the other way is something else.
According to declassified financial records and the
testimony of retired C.I.A. officers, the C.I.A. had
by 1961 developed implant devices for dogs, making it
possible for their handlers to guide them through various
courses by remote control. During this same time frame
they also developed techniques for disrupting bodily
functions with radio waves. By the mid-1960's they had
successfully developed and field-tested nonaural voice
communications with both radio and micro waves; and
by 1977 they had developed and field-tested a rudimentary
form of electromechanical "mind reading."
But despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, they
have steadfastly maintained that they failed entirely
in their quest to control the human mind. [Cited in
Mass
Mind Control by Laura Knight-Jadczyk]
Richard Dolan writes in his well-documented book UFOs
and the National Security State:
The most noteworthy feature of the American national
security state during the late 1960s was its covert
pervasiveness throughout American society. First, Hoover's
FBI. In 1968, the bureau initiated a COINTEL program
[...]
Next to the bureau, the military intelligence services
became the most important component of the domestic
intelligence scene. Army intelligence had nearly unlimited
funds, extensive manpower, specialized personnel, deep
planning and training resources, and the most sophisticated
communications and data processing capability. [...]
The army's intelligence surveillance did not focus
on tactical and reconnaissance data, but on political
and ideological intelligence within the United States.
(This was wholly illegal.) [...]
Then there was the CIA. By the late 1960s, there were
more spies than diplomats in the State Department, or
employees in the Department of Labor. [...] When the
Weather Underground, a radical splinter of the SDS,
had an "acid test" to detect agents provocateurs,
they had no idea that the CIA had been tripping on LSD
throughout the 1950s, creating a special caste of "enlightened
agents" for precisely these occasions. [Based on this,
we wonder about "agents provocateur" in the New Age
and UFO community who are "specially trained?"]
The agency continued its work on mind control. Following
the work of Dr. Jose Delgado [experiments in] Electrical
Stimulation of the Brain [were conducted.] This involves
implanting electrodes into the brain and body, with
the result that the subject's memory, impulses, and
feelings could all be controlled. Moreover, ESB could
evoke hallucinations, as well as fear and pleasure.
"It could literally manipulate the human will at will,"
[said Dr. Rober Keefe, a neurosurgeon at Tulane University.]
In 1968, George Estabrooks, another spook scientist,
spoke indiscreetly to a reporter for the Providence
Evening Bulletin. "The key to creating an effective
spy or assassin, rests in creating
a multiple personality with the aid of hypnosis,"
a procedure which he described as "child's play."
By early 1969, teams within the CIA were running a
number of bizarre experiments in mind control under
the name Operation Often. In addition to the normal
assortment of chemists, biologists, and conventional
scientists, the operation employed
psychics and experts in demonology.
Over at the NSA, all one can say with certainty is
that its budget dwarfed all others within the intelligence
community.
So mind control is not just something from the movies.
It works on many levels, from the control of the media
in shaping acceptable beliefs and defining what is "unthinkable",
to more active technology that can beam thoughts and sounds
into people's heads.
Looking at the sorry state of people's awareness in the
United States today, we wonder how much of this is being
used to keep the population docile and convinced that
it can do nothing in the face of two stolen presidential
elections, the 9/11 hoax and its subsequent neo-con expansionist
agenda, and imminent economic collapse and flu epidemic?
Because let's get one thing straight: the people in power
will stop at nothing to implement their plans. For decades,
billions of dollars have been funneled into secret projects,
many of which are staffed, or were, by scientists who
were brought over from the "defeated" Nazi Germany,
people whose scruples and moral character were apparent
from the nature of the regime under which they honed their
skills. If in the early sixties, these people were able
to control dogs through implants, given the advance in
technological sophistication in the intervening years,
can we even imagine what they might be able to do today?
We look at the US today and we see a citizenry that largely
accepts its fate. Politics is reduced to voting for two
look-alike parties every few years, two parties beholden
to corporate interests. There is no labour movement that
can sound the call to take to the streets and show one's
opposition to the Bush Reich politics. There is no organised
opposition on any level. You might even go so far as to
suggest that the US population has lost the ability to
think. Certainly, it is a skill
that is no longer taught in the US public school system.
Compare the situation in the USA to that in France. The
French just defeated the proposal to approve the proposed
European Constitution. When the government makes plans
to cut social services, the workers go to the streets.
When the government makes plans to change the educational
system to bring it more in line with the "needs of
business", the students go into the streets. While
there are historical and cultural reasons that might explain
this difference, we do not think that it is enough. We
think that the US population as a whole may well be subjected
to certain forms of "mind control". For more
on how this might work, we refer you to Laura's article
Something
Wicked This Way Comes, as well as her book The
Secret History of the World.
Whether the forms of mind control, or thought control,
are limited to the control of the mass media, or whether
they extend to include the technological means discussed
above, the solution for individuals is the same: knowledge
and awareness. If you know yourself, you can sense when
a thought is not your own. Have you ever thought something,
been surprised that you would think such a thing, and
then wondered where that came
from? It may simply be the effect of hearing the idea
repeated around you: after hearing your colleagues at
work making rascist remarks about Arabs, you might find
yourself having the same thought the next time you see
a news report on "Islamic terrorists". But if
you are conscious of your thoughts, you can catch yourself.
You can reject it, see that it is not "your"
thought, and discard it.
This is the basis of that quality that Americans value
so highly in the abstract while appearing incapable of
putting into practice: independent thinking.
But it is never too late. All it takes is a moment of
awareness, that flash of conscience that throws reality
into relief. Seize that feeling, grab it and hold onto
it dearly. Take that light and shine it on all of your
thoughts and ideas, your preconceptions and assumptions.
Begin to look down the rabbit hole and start the quest
to make your mind your own.
The dollar closed at 0.8099 euros
last week, down 1.3% from last week's close of 0.8208
euros. That puts the euro at 1.2348 dollars compared
to 1.2184 dollars the previous Friday. Oil closed at
62.31 dollars a barrel on Friday, a record weekly close,
and up 2.4% from the close of $60.83 a barrel the previous
Friday. Looking at oil in euros, a barrel of oil would
cost 50.46 euros, up from 49.93 euros a week earlier.
Gold closed at 442.90 dollars an ounce, up 1.6% from
$435.80 on the previous Friday. Gold in euros would
be 358.68 euros an ounce, up 0.3% from 357.68 on the
previous Friday. The gold/oil ratio closed at 7.11 down
0.7% from 7.16 last week, meaning the price of oil rose
faster than the price of gold. In the U.S. stock market
last week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at
10,561.14 down 0.8% from last week's close of 10,640.91.
The NASDAQ closed at 2.178.92, down 0.3% from last week's
close of 2184.83. The yield on the ten-year U.S. Treasury
Bond was 4.39%, up ten basis points from the previous
Friday's close of 4.29% continuing a steady climb in
long-term U.S. interest rates.
While the sharp drop in the dollar and U.S. stocks
and the sharp increase in the price of gold and oil
would seem to be ominous signs for the U.S. economy,
the media was taking it in stride, at least, attributing
the fall in stocks to the strong U.S. employment report
for July and the rise in oil to a lack of refining capacity:
Oil climbed within pennies of its all-time high on
Friday as U.S. refinery outages hampered efforts to
meet strong demand in the world's biggest consumer.
U.S. light sweet crude settled up 93 cents at $62.31
a barrel - the highest settlement on record - after
climbing as high as $62.45, which was 5 cents shy
of the all-time record set just Wednesday.
London Brent crude gained 95 cents to $61.07 a barrel.
"It's no secret that refineries
are the problem. There wouldn't be a problem if there
was any slack in the system," said Tony Nunan,
a manager at Mitsubishi Corp.'s international energy
business in Tokyo.
A half-dozen refineries in the United
States have been forced into unplanned shutdowns since
late July and some have had to delay planned restarts,
leaving the market on edge after U.S. gasoline stocks
fell a sharp 4 million barrels last week.
Gasoline inventories have fallen into the lower half
of their seasonal average, while demand is running
1.1 percent stronger than last year with a month left
in the summer season.
U.S. supplies of distillates, which include heating
oil, rose 1.5 million barrels last week to stand almost
3 percent higher than a year ago, but even stronger
demand growth for these fuels coupled with refinery
trip-ups could dent supplies before winter.
"Demand is so high and capacity is so low, we
can go from comfortable to uncomfortable inventories
within a month," Nunan said.
Adding to concerns was news of a
pipe bomb attack at PDVSA's Maracaibo headquarters
in Venezuela, the world's No. 5 oil exporter. PDVSA
said the three pipe bombs that exploded caused no
damage or injuries.
Additional disruptions could come from an unusually
active Atlantic hurricane season, which has already
produced eight named storms and could culminate in
as many as 21 tropical storms and 11 hurricanes, U.S.
government weather forecasters have said.
OPEC PUMPS MORE
Prices have rallied more than 40 percent this year
despite OPEC pumping at its highest rate in more than
25 years, with traders fearing the cartel's thinned
cushion of spare production capacity may be insufficient
to compensate for any unexpected outages.
Total OPEC production rose 290,000 bpd to 30.24 million
bpd in July, the highest since December 1979, as Iraq
boosted exports and the United Arab Emirates restored
output at oilfields after maintenance, a Reuters survey
showed.
OPEC is due to meet next month to discuss its output
policy, where some members favor suspending quotas
to allow a production free-for-all, Nigeria's top
oil official Edmund Daukoru said on Thursday.
Most members, aside from Saudi Arabia, are already
pumping flat out.
Daukoru said OPEC might decide to keep production
quotas unchanged or raise them, but would not cut
output.
What was that about a pipe bomb attack in Venezuela?
Who would order an attack on the headquarters of Venezuela's
national oil company except CIA backed rebels? Why were
the refineries shut down in the United States? Why isn't
Saudi Arabia pumping "flat out" like the article
says the rest of OPEC countries are? Could it be that
the United States wants high oil prices? High oil prices
certainly have helped Bush-connected oil sector corporations.
Something to keep in mind when listening to the Peak
Oil chorus.
The consensus about the July U.S. jobs report which
showed a rise of 207,000 jobs was that it showed the
U.S. economy is growing at a healthy rate and that it
will lead the U.S. Federal Reserve Board to keep raising
interest rates.
U.S. job growth picked up last month as employers
added 207,000 workers to their payrolls, a healthy
gain that led Wall Street to increase bets on rate
hikes from the Federal Reserve.
The unemployment rate held steady
at the 5 percent reached in June, the lowest level
since September 2001, the Labor Department said on
Friday.
"This is a crystal clear indication that the
labor markets are very healthy and it reinforces the
notion that the economy is growing in a healthy, sustainable
way," said Dana Johnson, chief economist at Comerica
in Detroit.
The Fed, which has raised the benchmark overnight
lending rate at each of its last nine meetings, is
widely expected to bump it up another quarter-percentage
point to 3.5 percent when officials gather on Tuesday.
"The Fed is going to keep chugging along,"
said Robert MacIntosh, chief economist at Eaton Vance
Management in Boston.
Financial markets see the rate hitting 4 percent
by year end, although the jobs report had some betting
it could move even higher.
The payrolls gain, spurred on by service-sector hiring,
was stronger than expected by economists who had looked
for an increase of 183,000 with the jobless rate steady.
Prices for U.S. government bonds fell sharply on
the data, pushing yields higher, the dollar strengthened
and stock prices fell as markets braced for further
Fed interest rate increases.
The Bush administration hailed the report as a sign
of the economy's vigor. "This shows that the
fundamentals of our economy are strong and that we
are continuing on a positive path of growth and prosperity,"
U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow said in a statement.
While some economists thought the report might be
skewed by Hurricane Dennis, which battered the Florida
panhandle in mid-July, the department said the storm
appeared to have no discernible impact on the figures.
A net upward revision of 42,000 to the combined job
count for May and June contributed to the report's
solid tenor. U.S. employers added 166,000 workers
in June and 126,000 in May.
The pickup in job growth last month pushed this year's
average monthly payroll gain to 191,000, a pace economists
see as strong enough to slowly tighten the labor market.
The factory sector, which shed 4,000 workers last
month, was one of the only weak spots. However, the
Labor Department noted that an 11,000-job drop in
auto manufacturing reflected larger-than-normal temporary
plant shutdowns for retooling.
STRONG ECONOMY = HIGHER RATES
The report was the latest in a string of strong data
and the last significant piece of economic news before
Fed policy-makers meet next week.
Average hourly earnings shot up six cents, or 0.4
percent, in July -- the biggest rise in a year. However,
earnings are up just 2.7 percent over the past 12
months, suggesting wages have yet to become a big
inflationary concern.
"As far as the Fed is concerned, payrolls growth
is probably just about right -- not too hot and not
too cold," Paul Ashworth of Capital Economics
told clients in a research note.
Job growth was tepid at construction
firms, which brought on just 7,000 new workers, but
was strong on the service side of the economy.
Retailers added 50,000 workers,
the biggest gain in that sector since April 2000.
The strong retail hiring in part reflected job growth
at automobile dealers coping with a surge of shoppers
enticed by special incentives.
Professional and business service firms, education
and health service employers and the leisure and hospitality
industry all exhibited robust hiring.
In another spot of bright economic news, the independent
Economic Cycle Research Institute said on Friday its
leading index of the U.S. economy rose to a 12-week
last week. ECRI said the index suggested prospects
for U.S. economic growth were improving gradually.
The long-term interest rates which have been rising
steadily lately have started to affect the mortgage
rates which have also risen lately. If the United States
economy were a closed system, these interest rate hikes
would be nothing to worry about, but given the unpegging
of the Chinese Yuan from the dollar, which will add
considerable upward pressure on U.S. interest rates,
this is bad news which could lead to the bursting of
the housing bubble, thereby bringing down the world
economy. Notice in the above article that the rise in
the construction sector was very small, only 7,000 jobs.
Notice also that the strongest sector was retailing
- people spending money they shouldn't on new cars,
having been lured by incentives for 2005 models that
have hurt profits for auto companies while calling into
question the sales for 2006 models which will be introduced
soon.
30-year benchmark rises to 5.82
percent, Freddie Mac reports
The Associated Press
Updated: 1:21 p.m. ET Aug. 4, 2005
WASHINGTON - Mortgage rates continued their upward
climb this week, with rates on 30-year mortgages rising
to their highest point since the middle of April.
In its weekly survey, mortgage giant Freddie Mac
reported Thursday that rates on 30-year, fixed-rate
mortgages rose to a nationwide average of 5.82 percent,
up from 5.77 percent last week.
It marked the fifth week in a row
that rates on 30-year mortgages went up. This week's
increase left rates on 30-year mortgages at their
highest since they averaged 5.91 percent for the week
ending April 14.
Yet rates on 30-year mortgages are still considered
good and have stayed below 6 percent for all but two
weeks this year. That has helped to propel home sales
to record levels in June.
Rates on 15-year, fixed-rate mortgages, a popular
choice for refinancing a home mortgage, averaged 5.38
percent this week, compared with 5.34 percent last
week. This week's rate also was the highest since
the middle of April.
"Long-term mortgage rates will more than likely
rise over the next few months, albeit modestly compared
to shorter-term rates," predicted Frank Nothaft,
Freddie Mac's chief economist.
Given all this supposedly great economic news in the
United States, why do polls show that most people think
the economy is in bad shape? The following wire service
article provides a clue:
ST. LOUIS (Reuters) - Laid off from an auto factory
assembly line two weeks before Christmas, Gary Asnell
is still jobless and doesn't care to hear about the
virtues of retraining as he struggles to keep a roof
over his family's head.
"They say it's a great opportunity to go back
to school. But I've got to juggle to find a job to
pay the bills, make the house payments and feed the
children," said Asnell, a 44-year-old father
of three.
In the face of rabid global competition
and outsourcing of work to cheap-labor countries like
China, nearly three million American manufacturing
jobs have been lost since 2000.
Those at the sharp end of this process now often
face serious pay cuts or retraining to qualify for
jobs in industries that have vacancies which may still
not pay as much as they were making before.
In the heart of the U.S. Midwest,
St. Louis, Missouri was an archetypal factory town.
Twenty five years ago, 40 percent of all of its high-paying
jobs were in manufacturing, according to a March study
by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
But in the last 10 years, it has
lost 63,000 manufacturing jobs. Today, the industry
provides just 3 percent of all job vacancies, a recent
Job Openings Survey from the University of Missouri
found, while health care, social assistance and the
hospitality industry deliver 60 percent.
Getting a well-paid position in any of these areas
could easily demand a trip back to the classroom.
Even for the young, the process is tough.
Jessica Fitter was lucky. Just 22 years old, she
worked at the same plant as Asnell. She is now taking
a two-year accounting course and expresses optimism
about her future.
Yet even once she graduates, Fitter said the pay
will only just match what she made before, at least
until she gains more experience. Meanwhile, the loss
of income has been hard.
"Our budget took a big hit. We have to move,
we can't afford our place anymore," she said.
Her partner was laid off with her and is now making
much less building houses.
They were among 237 workers cut at Lear Corp. in
St. Louis when the company, which makes seats for
Ford and Lincoln SUVs, halved the assembly line shifts
last Dec. 17 as Ford slashed demand from a nearby
plant. As it happens, Ford Motor Co. is in the process
of shedding another 900 St. Louis workers.
Everyone who lost their job at Lear was offered the
chance to retrain. But this option does not appeal
to everyone.
"The curriculum, you need to do it, you just
don't have it anymore," said Asnell. "I
had the prerequisites 15-20 years ago, but I don't
now."
With his schooling a distant memory and bills to
pay right now, Asnell knows his well-paid union job
has vanished and the work that remains will pay barely
half as much.
"We were up to $19 an hour
(at Lear), but most of the jobs now pay $7-$8 an hour.
Ten bucks is considered the upper limit and if you
make $12 you're on top of the world," he said.
Of the 8,000 entry-level jobs identified in the University
of Missouri study, 45 percent paid less than $8 an
hour and the next 25 percent paid less than $15 an
hour.
Even if he wanted to take a lower-paid
job, Asnell finds that prospective employers don't
want to take the chance of hiring. He said they usually
look at how much he earned before, inform him that
he wouldn't be happy making less and close the interview.
NATIONAL CRISIS
Officials from President Bush on down somberly acknowledge
the process of globalization is sometimes painful
and demands a national effort to improve education
and skill development.
But among people dealing directly
with the fallout of this upheaval in the U.S. industrial
base, the truth for older workers is that their standards
of living may never recover.
At the state level, dedicated teams are working hard
to ease the transition back to work and can claim
some success.
"It really is walking someone through a grieving
process," said Donald Holt, executive director
in the St. Charles County, Missouri career center,
where many of the state's job losses from the and
auto industry have fallen.
His staff offer all manner of support for displaced
workers and will also pay for retraining up to a point.
Yet even with jobs available in the St. Louis area,
high demands for math and English literacy means that
workers who left school several decades ago often
have problems.
"It's an issue and we have to deal with it.
You run into it with your older clients... who went
in (to the factory) aged 18 and stayed for years.
It is very hard for them to go into just about any
occupation now without computer skills," Holt
said.
Any new job in modern manufacturing demands some
level of math and computing skills that many older
workers just do not possess. Not that there are many
manufacturing jobs out there.
Well-paid opportunities exist, particularly in health
care, but they demand a solid grasp of math, physics
and biology.
"In Kansas City, we had a pilot who went into
radiology -- we paid for the retraining -- and he's
started at $24 an hour. That's compared with $20 an
hour as a pilot," said Don Rahm, a work force
development specialist with the Missouri Department
of Economic Development.
Still for those who see little prospect
of making such a transition, there is a powerful sense
of abandonment and anger at a culture that has chewed
them up and spat them out.
"How much money do you
have to make to make you happy?" demanded Asnell.
"Sure, I understand how our economy works, but
how many people do you have to crush for your company
to be happy with what it is making?"
And, lest you think that these displaced workers don't
know as much as the experts, here is an expert with
his eye on the big picture:
Max Fraad Wolff is a Doctoral Candidate in Economics
at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
August 4, 2005
As second quarter numbers
are digested and expectations are ratcheted up, selective
focus reigns supreme. The Peoples Bank of China (PBoC)
decision to delink exclusively from the US Dollar,
and the most recent profit and personal income numbers
have gone unexamined and largely unpriced.
Despite all this, our dominant three indexes have
all underperformed our sub-accurate leading inflation
measures. That must be why so many are so confident
in their up revised prognostication. Just in case
major macro events still interest you, I have cobbled
together some thoughts on epic making recent developments
that are particularly hard to spot through rose colored
glasses and froth.
Personal income data, reported by the Bureau of Economic
Analysis (BEA) on August 02, 2005 was terrifying.
No, I don't mean that we have valiantly reached a
national savings rate of 0%, although that is truly
frightening. I mean that what everyone thinks of as
personal income went up .2% not .5% in June. Wage
and Salary disbursements went up a whopping .2% and
supplemental income went up an astonishing .3%. Ouch!
Where did the feds get that .5% headline number? Proprietors'
income with inventory valuation and capital compensation
adjustment was up a strong 2.0% in June. Proprietor's
income grew at 400% its three year average rate while
wage and salary income grew at 50% its anemic three
year growth rate. Buckle up American Business the
public is flush. Well, perhaps the next best thing,
they spent like they were. Perennially undeterred
by affordability, America went shopping for expensive
durable goods. June spending on these expensive items
came in just under 300% of its three year average
growth rate. I guess folks are bullish given housing's
great returns. Adjusted rental income was down 5.5%.
Now that the usual reports of beating expectations
are in for better than three quarters of the S&P500
we can do some taking of stock. Yes, most firms (60%)
beat expectations as they now do every quarter. Although
earnings growth was strong in the second quarter,
profit growth rates are decelerating and are expected
to continue to slow for the rest of this year.
No one is talking about an
ominous but interesting series of recent reports and
polls on Brand America. Business for Diplomatic Action,
a consortium of concerned business leaders, has been
raising concern and warning about a global turning
away. Several recent polls reveal a growing hostility
toward the US and this seems to be beginning to affect
the perception of our businesses. The Anholt-GMI National
Brands Index shows declining regard for the US outside
simply our foreign policy. Most recently the US ranked
11th for overall perception thanks to low opinions
of our culture and populace. A recent poll of 1004
Americans conducted by Foreign Affairs and Public
Agenda discovered that a clear majority of Americans
have become worried about the way America and her
citizens are perceived around the world. Will earnings
estimates remain immune to such sentiments?
Last but not least, the prestige and position of
the US dollar declined last month. The much anticipated
and quantitatively anti-climactic revaluation of the
Yuan slipped into the past tense on July 21, 2005.
While a modest 2.1% revaluation against the dollar
failed to impress many, the real story is China's
delinking, rapidly followed by Malaysia's decision
to follow suit. Although China's move was much trumpeted
as beneficial and a sign of our influence, I beg to
differ. China is almost as influential an importer
of raw materials as it is an exporter of finished
goods. I see no reason brutal internal competition
and the mortal need to grow exports may not result
in the pass through of import cost savings to lower
export prices. Where is that discussion? China and
other nations must now change the composition of their
currency reserves. They and Malaysia clearly need
to reallocate reserves away from the dollar. Who else
will follow? In addition, following on the rancorous
dispute- with much political involvement in both nations-
over Unocal, China's desire for contested global assets
and acquisition currency will only grow. What does
that portend?
In short, with just shy of
the 70% of 2005 in the history books, the consensus
is that all is well and getting better. Will this
subjective view soon be subject to revision?
Wolf has put his finger on the crucial issue: subjectivity
versus objectivity. People, cultures, and empires come
to grief if they remain in the grip of subjective thinking.
One symptom of this is the focus on oneself and the
ignoring of others. Subjective thinking can also lead
to wishful thinking, where bad news is discounted and
power leads one to conclude that things are the way
one wants them to be. The Thomas Friedman-type globalization
cheerleading is a good example. James Howard Kunstler
points out that 21st century globalization depends on
peace and cheap energy. Steel and cars are very heavy.
Transporting them halfway across the world used to cost
more than it did to produce the goods. According to
Kunstler, taking either leg of globalization away would
eliminate it:
Cheap energy and relative peace
helped create a false doctrine
James Howard Kunstler
Thursday August 4, 2005
The big yammer these days in the United States is
to the effect that globalisation is here to stay:
it's wonderful, get used to it. The chief cheerleader
for this point of view is Thomas Friedman, columnist
for the New York Times and author of The World Is
Flat. The seemingly unanimous
embrace of this idea in the power circles of America
is a marvelous illustration of the madness of crowds,
for nothing could be further from the truth than the
idea that globalisation is now a permanent fixture
of the human condition.
Today's transient global economic
relations are a product of very special transient
circumstances, namely relative world peace and absolutely
reliable supplies of cheap energy. Subtract either
of these elements from the equation and you will see
globalisation evaporate so quickly it will suck the
air out of your lungs. It is significant that none
of the cheerleaders for globalisation takes this equation
into account. In fact, the American power elite is
sleepwalking into a crisis so severe that the blowback
may put both major political parties out of business.
The world saw an earlier phase of robust global trade
run from the 1870s to a dead stop in 1914. This was
the boom period of railroad construction and the advent
of the ocean-going steamship. The great powers had
existed in relative peace since Napoleon's last stand.
The Crimean war was a minor episode that took place
in backwaters of Eurasia, and the Franco-Prussian
war was a comic opera that lasted less than a year
- most of it the static siege of Paris. The American
civil war hardly affected the rest of the world.
This first phase of globalisation then took off under
coal-and-steam power. There was no shortage of fuel,
the colonial boundaries were stable, and the pipeline
of raw materials from them to the factories of western
Europe ran smoothly. The rise of a middle class running
the many stages of the production process provided
markets for all the new production. Innovations in
finance gave legitimacy to all kinds of tradable paper.
Life was very good for Europe and America, notwithstanding
a few sharp cyclical depressions and recoveries. Trade
boomed between the great powers. The belle époque
represented the high tide of hopeful expectations.
In America, it was called the progressive era. The
20th century looked golden.
It all fell apart in 1914. Historians
are still baffled about what really brought on the
first world war. What did France or Britain really
care about Austrian archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir
to the throne of a country already in deep eclipse?
There were no active contests over territory at the
time, not even in the Asian or African colonies. And
yet the diplomatic failures of that fateful summer
led to the great slaughter of the trenches, the death
of a substantial portion of the younger generation,
and a virtual nervous breakdown of authority in politics
and culture. It would take a depression, fascism,
and a second world war to resolve these issues and
a new round of globalisation did not ramp up again
until the mid-1960s.
It may be significant that the first
collapse of globalisation occurred as the coal economy
was transitioning into an oil economy, with deep geo-political
implications for who had oil (America) and those who
might seek to control the other major region closest
to Europe that possessed it (then the Caspian, since
Arabian oil was as yet undiscovered). The first world
war was settled by those nations (Britain and France)
that were friendly with the greatest producer of oil
most readily accessed. Germany was the loser and again
in the reprise for its poor access to oil. Japan suffered
similarly.
We are now due for another folding up of the periodic
global trade fair as the industrial nations enter
the tumultuous era beyond the global oil production
peak, which I have named the long emergency. The economic
distortions and perversities that have built up in
the current era are not hard to see, though our leaders
dread to acknowledge them. The dirty secret of the
US economy for at least a decade now is that it has
come to be based on the ceaseless elaboration of a
car-dependent suburban infrastructure - McHousing
estates, eight-lane highways, big-box chain stores,
hamburger stands - that has no future as a living
arrangement in an oil-short future.
The American suburban juggernaut
can be described succinctly as the greatest misallocation
of resources in the history of the world. The mortgages,
bonds, real estate investment trusts and derivative
financial instruments associated with this tragic
enterprise must make the judicious goggle with wonder
and nausea.
Add to this grim economic picture a far-flung military
contest, already under way, really, for control of
the world's remaining oil, and the scene grows darker.
Two-thirds of that oil is in the possession of people
who resent the west (America in particular), many
of whom have vowed to destroy it. Both America and
Britain have felt the sting of freelance asymmetrical
war-makers not associated with a particular state
but with a transnational religious cause that uses
potent small arms and explosives to unravel western
societies and confound their defences.
China, a supposed beneficiary of globalisation, will
be as desperate for oil as all the other players,
and perhaps more ruthless in seeking control of the
supplies, some of which they can walk to. Of course,
it is hard to imagine the continuation of American
chain stores' manufacturing supply lines with China,
given the potential for friction. Even on its own
terms, China faces issues of environmental havoc,
population overshoot, and political turmoil - orders
of magnitude greater than anything known in Europe
or America.
Viewed through this lens,
the sunset of the current phase of globalisation seems
dreadfully close to the horizon. The American public
has enjoyed the fiesta, but the blue-light special
orgy of easy motoring, limitless air-conditioning,
and super-cheap products made by factory slaves far
far away is about to close down. Globalisation is
finished. The world is about to become a larger place
again.
By GILLIAN WONG
Associated Press
Mon Aug 8, 1:07 AM ET
SINGAPORE - Crude futures rose
to a new high of $62.69 in Asian trading Monday as the
U.S. government announced the closure of its embassy
and consulates in Saudi Arabia due to security threats
and on continued concerns that earlier shutdowns of
U.S. oil refineries would reduce supply.
Midmorning in Singapore, light, sweet crude for September
delivery on the New York Mercantile Exchange rose as
high as $62.69 in Asian electronic trading before slipping
back to $62.51. On Friday, crude settled at U$62.31
a barrel, a record close for crude since Nymex trading
began in 1983.
That's 42 percent higher than a year
ago, though crude prices would have to surpass $90 to
reach the inflation-adjusted high set in 1980.
Gasoline edged up slightly to $1.8415 a gallon while
heating oil rose marginally to $1.7390 a gallon.
The market was on edge as traders
closely monitored geopolitical developments in Saudi
Arabia following Sunday's announcement of a security
threat against U.S. government buildings. A week
ago, the death of the country's king also rocked markets,
even though many analysts believe there will be little
long-term change in the oil policies of Saudi Arabia,
the world's biggest petroleum producer.
The planned closure Monday and Tuesday of the U.S.
Embassy in Riyadh and consulates in Jiddah and Dhahran
was "in response to a threat against U.S. government
buildings" in the kingdom, the embassy said, adding
it would also limit nonofficial travel of its mission
personnel.
In a statement, it urged Americans residing in the
world's largest oil producing and exporting country
to keep "a high level of vigilance," but did
not elaborate on the nature of the threat.
Hours after the announcement,
a Saudi Interior Ministry spokesman, Maj. Gen. Mansour
al-Turki, said his government had no information about
a possible threat. [...]
Former Foreign Secretary Robin
Cook, who quit government over the Iraq war, has collapsed
on a Scottish mountainside.
Thereafter he was flown by coastguard helicopter to
Raigmore Hospital in Inverness, where he died on Saturday
evening, police said.
However, the idea is already
being mooted that he was, like Dr
David Kelly, 'taken out'
by covert assassination.
Robin Cook had quit as Commons leader in March 2003,
in protest over the war in Iraq. He
had been one of the most outspoken and prominent critics
of Blair's stance on Iraq.
The Scottish MP, who lived in Edinburgh, was a keen
walker and cyclist and until now his health was said
to have been in good health.
Mr Cook, who first became an MP for Edinburgh Central
in 1974, was appointed the shadow health secretary in
1989 and became the shadow trade and industry secretary
in 1992.
In 1997 he became foreign secretary,
a position he held until 2001 when he was replaced by
Jack Straw after openly oppossing Blair's stance on
Iraq.
He had been an outspoken critic of the government's
foreign policy from the backbench and speculation is
growing that he was seen as an impediment to further
moves in the "War on Terror", in particular
an expansion of the war into Iran or Syria.
A post mortem examination is expected
to be carried out to determine the cause of the death
of former Foreign Secretary Robin Cook.
Mr Cook, 59, collapsed while on a walking holiday with
wife Gaynor in northern Scotland on Saturday and was
pronounced dead after being airlifted to hospital some
90 minutes later.
It is thought that the Livingston
MP may have collapsed with a heart attack and then injured
himself as he fell.
"ICH" -- "I am utterly
against the punishing of innocent people for the crimes
of the guilty, whether it is done on the underground
of London or the streets of Falluja by George Bush's
air force". George Galloway MP
George Galloway is quite a guy.
His trip to the Middle East is causing a ruckus back
in London, where his criticism of Bush and Blair is
appearing like a spread-sheet on the front-page of the
tabloids.
Congrats, George; those two deserve a good lambasting.
Yesterday he fired-off another barrage, landing a direct
hit on Prime Minister Milquetoast and his Texas-twin.
He said, "There's far more
blood on the hands of George Bush and Tony Blair than
there is on the hands of the murderers who killed those
people in London."
Ka-boom! Right on target.
Galloway was stellar; praising the Iraqi resistance
as "martyrs" and telling them that they "are
not just defending Iraq, but defending the whole world
against American hegemony."
Bulls-eye.
Galloway's comments drew attention to the young men
who are swarming to Iraq to fight what he calls the
"foreign invaders". They're normally disparaged
by the pro-war crowd in the press like Tom Friedman
who calls them a "jihadist death-cult"
What rubbish. Friedman should skip
the name-calling and try to figure out who these guys
really are. Men don't simply throw away their lives
for no reason. It is the injustice of the American occupation
that has the swollen the ranks of the Iraqi resistance.
Galloway knows that and so does Friedman when he's
not shoveling manure into the "paper of record".
Imagine, for a moment, that the US
was invaded by an army from Saudi Arabia for the transparent
purpose of securing America's great natural wealth.
And, imagine that tens of thousands of American people
were killed in that invasion, entire cities were leveled
as reprisal for resisting, and scores of Americans were
tortured and humiliated in the most despicable manner.
What type of man would risk his own
life to travel to the United States to fight for the
liberation of the American people from Saudi oppression?
A terrorist or a martyr?
Forget the media hype about suicide bombers targeting
innocent Iraqis. Communiqués from the resistance
have repeatedly refuted those claims saying they do
not attack Iraqi civilians, only the occupiers and their
collaborators in the Iraqi security services.
Who're we going to believe; the Pentagon?
Galloway nailed it when he said, "These poor Iraqis,
ragged people with their sandals, with their Kalashnikovs,
with the lightest most basic weapons-are writing the
names of their cities and towns in the stars, with 145
military operations every day which has made the country
ungovernable."
Game; Set; Match.
Galloway can expect to be roundly throttled for his
remarks, but the truth is out and can't be undone. The
Iraqi resistance is the frontlines in the war against
American global domination. They're doing the fighting
in the trenches while Americans continue to stumble
around in their perpetual state of amnesia.
Can't Americans see their civil
liberties being methodically savaged by Bush's rubber-stamp
Congress? Will it take a decree of martial law to wake
them up to this "gathering threat" emerging
from the Bush White House? We should applaud
Galloway's willingness to state the obvious; that the
men who have taken up arms in Iraq are engaged in a
life-or-death struggle against a neo-liberal cancer
that is menacing the entire world.
Those who doubt what I say should consider Blair's
news conference yesterday, where he rattled-off a whole
new list of repressive measures to be directed at Muslims.
Mimicking his Crawford mentor,
Blair has decided that he has the right to unilaterally
make law from his perch at 10 Downing St. without the
consent of Parliament. The fatuous PM now claims the
power to close down mosques, deport, clerics and shut
down web sites where the views don't meet the dubious
standards of the state. Additionally, Israeli trained
police-units have been deployed on London's streets
with orders to "shoot to kill" terror suspects
(or fleeing Brazilians) if there is a perceived risk
to public safety.
Who gave this unctuous, lying politician the right
to declare martial law on Muslims?
Who gave this foppish phony the license to issue Nazi-type
edicts that eviscerate basic civil liberties?
The British people would be foolish to let the wildly-unpopular
Blair get away with this monumental power-grab.
85% of the British people already
agree that the London bombings were the direct result
of Blair's involvement in Iraq. Similarly, every
terrorist-expert on the planet; including analysts at
M15, the CIA, and the Israeli Mossad, have supported
that very same conclusion. So, why should the victims
of Blair's bungled aggression be the same one's who
are collectively punished?
Comment: Let's
stop and think about this for a minute. 85% of the British
people believe that the London bombings were the direct
result of Blair's involvement in Iraq as Bush's lapdog.
MI5, the CIA, and the Mossad all agree with this assessment.
Given that the train bombings in Madrid had all the
"fingerprints" of Mossad, and that the CIA
has been rendering prisoners to countries that practice
torture since 1995, why should we listen to them at
all? Aren't such agencies a huge part of the problem
in the so-called War on Terror?
It makes one wonder just how much
of a roll MI5 might have played in the London bombings.
The London bombings were sloppy compared to the 9/11
attacks. If 9/11 was a false-flag operation carried
out primarily by the Mossad, MI5 could certainly have
crafted the London bombings at the particular time that
Blair needed a boost to pass his new fascist laws. Then,
after the attacks, they come out in support of the 85%
that think the bombings were acts committed by Arab
terrorists, of course. They don't want anyone pointing
the finger their way...
It's Blair who should be manacled and led away to the
stocks, not the Muslims who already are suffering the
blowback from his apocryphal war on terror.
No one in their right mind believes
that Blair conjured up these new restrictions. His job
is to simply recite his lines for the teleprompter and
make sure his eye-shadow and silk-shirt are in order.
It's the big-money elites behind Blair that have their
sights on personal liberty, just as they do in America
and Australia. (Australia's Howard is trying to enact
similar legislation right now) These are the 3 stooges
of the international corporate-banking cabal; the tawdry
courtesans of the global parasite-class.
Just listen to Zbigniew Brzezinski, founder of the
Trilateral Commission, former board-member of the Council
on Foreign Relations, former Co-Chair of the Bush National
Security Task Force, and all-around foot-soldier for
American elites. Brzezinski is comfortably lodged at
the very center of an elite cadre of nutcases who have
been pushing for the New World Order (One world government)
for over 20 years. His comments reflect the prevailing
views of the main actors in the Bush-Blair-Howard governments.
"It is also a fact that America is too democratic
at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use
of America's power, especially its capacity for military
intimidation. Never before has a populist democracy
attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of
power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except
in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the
public's sense of domestic well-being. The economic
self-denial (that is, defense spending) and the human
sacrifice (casualties, even among professional soldiers)
required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic
instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization."
("The Grand Chessboard; p.35)
"Too democratic"?
"Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization."?
Brzezinski hates democracy every bit as much as the
men who back Blair. They've concluded that they can
pretty well dispose of personal liberty in a few years
by taking advantage terrorist attacks, exploiting public
hysteria, and crafting a media narrative that supports
the crushing of individual freedom.That's
why we should take these new anti-Islam laws for what
they really are; a forerunner to the repressive measures
that will be applied to everyone without discrimination
in the very near future.
Can anyone seriously doubt this after seeing the pattern
of the last 5 years?
That's why we need guys like Galloway
who'll stand up and take a few hardy swings at the scoundrels
in power. His words put a little steel in everyone's
spine; and we're going to need it, too. There's plenty
of bad road ahead.
Comment: There
are a number of people in the US and Britain
who are standing up to the Bush and Blair regimes, but
their numbers are pitifully small. It seems that the
fear tactics and stories of torture have worked well
to shut up the rest of the population...
CRAWFORD, Texas - The angry mother
of a fallen U.S. soldier staged a protest near President
Bush's ranch Saturday, demanding an accounting from
Bush of how he has conducted the war in
Iraq.
Supported by more than 50 demonstrators who chanted,
"W. killed her son!" Cindy Sheehan told reporters:
"I want to ask the president, 'Why did you kill
my son? What did my son die for?'" Sheehan,
48, didn't get to see Bush, but did talk about 45 minutes
with national security adviser Steve Hadley and deputy
White House chief of staff Joe Hagin, who went out to
hear her concerns.
Appreciative of their attention, yet undaunted, Sheehan
said she planned to continue her roadside vigil, except
for a few breaks, until she gets to talk to Bush. Her
son, Casey, 24, was killed in Sadr City, Iraq, on April
4, 2004. He was an Army specialist, a Humvee mechanic.
"They (the advisers) said we
are in Iraq because they believed
Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, that
the world's a better place with Saddam gone and that
we're making the world a safer place with what we're
doing over there," Sheehan said in a telephone
interview after the meeting.
"They were very respectful. They
were nice men. I told them Iraq was not a threat to
the United States and that now people are dead for nothing.
I told them I wouldn't leave until I talked to George
Bush."
She said Hagin told her, "I want to assure you
that he (Bush) really does care."
"And I said if he does care, why
doesn't he come out and talk to me."
Sheehan arrived in Crawford aboard a bus painted red,
white and blue and emblazoned with the words, "Impeachment
Tour." Sheehan, from Vacaville, Calif., had been
attending a Veterans for Peace convention in Dallas.
The bus, trailed by about 20 cars of protesters and
reporters, drove at about 15 mph toward Bush's ranch.
After several miles, they parked the vehicles and began
to march, in stifling heat, farther down the narrow
country road.
Flanked by miles of pasture, Sheehan spoke with reporters
while clutching two photographs, one of her son in uniform,
and the other, a baby picture, when he was seven months
old.
She said she decided to come to Crawford a few days
ago after Bush said that fallen U.S. troops had died
for a noble cause and that the mission must be completed.
"I want to ask the president,
'Why did you kill my son? What did my son die for?"
she said, her voice cracking with emotion. "Last
week, you said my son died for a noble cause' and I
want to ask him what that noble cause is?"
White House spokesman Trent Duffy said response that
Bush also wants the troops to return home safely.
"Many of the hundreds of families the president
has met with know their loved one died for a noble cause
and that the best way to honor their sacrifice is to
complete the mission," Duffy said.
"It is a message the president has heard time
and again from those he has met with and comforted.
Like all Americans, he wants the troops home as soon
as possible."
The group marched about a half-mile before local law
enforcement officials stopped them at a bend in the
road, still four to five miles from the ranch's entrance.
Capt. Kenneth Vanek of the McLennan
County Sheriff's Office said the group was stopped because
some marchers ignored instructions to walk in the ditch
beside the road, not on the road.
"If they won't cooperate, we won't," Vanek
said.
Comment: Somehow,
we doubt that Sheehan will get her meeting with Bush
- especially considering the US president's recent low
popularity ratings.
It’s no longer Zionized Left vs. Armageddon Right
— the new political Feather of Truth is honesty
By John Kaminski
skylax@comcast.net
I am a citizen of the world first, and of this
country at a later and more convenient hour.
— Henry David Thoreau
"We are each one of us responsible for every
war because of the aggressiveness of our own lives,
because of our nationalism, our selfishness, our gods,
our prejudices, our ideals, all of which divide us.
And only when we realise, not intellectually but actually,
as actually as we would recognise that we are hungry
or in pain, that you and I are responsible for all this
existing chaos, for all the misery throughout the entire
world because we have contributed to it in our daily
lives and are part of this monstrous society with its
wars, divisions, its ugliness, brutality and greed —
only then will we act.
— Jiddu Krishnamurti
Nobody predicted this one — not Orwell, not Huxley,
not H.G. Wells.
I couldn’t believe the words that appeared on my
screen in an e-mail:
Overthrow
all the governments
all at once
International criminal syndicate
has taken control of world’s money;
honest citizens must prevent
them from destroying the world;
Lennon was right:
all borders are bogus.
Is there any reason
we can’t have an honest world?
What a radical idea! Isn’t that what decent people
want? But is that the world we have? We have massive numbers
of dead people turning up in strange and suspicious mortality
categories. Shall I tell you Americans some of the causes
of death inflicted by your sons and daughters on innocent
children in Iraq, or will you turn your face away and
return silently to your polite political dogma and the
cringing ugliness of your own suppressed private nightmares?
Hmm?
We haven’t had enough radicals. America was founded
by radicals (though some were surreptitious scoundrels,
too). Jefferson, even Adams, Madison and Franklin were
radicals, and we Americans would definitely not have the
good deal we have without the intrepid efforts of these
intelligent men.
Franklin, you remember Franklin, the guy with the kite.
“A republic,” he said, “if you can keep
it.”
And Jefferson, perhaps you recall, said:
"Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments
long established, should not be changed for light and
transient causes; and, accordingly, all experience [has]
shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer while
evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing
the forms to which they are accustomed. But, when a
long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably
the same object, evinces a design to reduce [the people]
under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their
duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new
guards for their future security."
In our lifetimes and in fact ever since World War I,
we’ve seen precious few hints of radicalism: left
wing radicals like Abbie Hoffman in the ’60s challenged
perceptions and changed them enough to stop a war; right
wing radical Gordon Kahl had his hands cut off by federal
agents; way out radicals like David Koresh got to watch
his babies burn because he said the new messiah was from
Iran; and, of course, Eugene Debs was the most successful
socialist radical in American history; he got 6 percent
of the vote in a presidential election (1912) and actually
raised the hourly pay rate for many Americans before he
wound up in jail.
Do you ever wonder who exactly it was who brought the
hammer down on these radicals? Or why what they said elicited
such disproportionate punishment?
Today I guess you could say radicals include Kathy Kelly,
the Voices for Peace lady doing time for insisting on
assisting victims of America’s Iraq genocide, and
some of the honorable soldiers like Kevin Benderman who
chose jail over crimes against humanity. Also are the
Roman Catholic nuns who doing three-year vacations in
a Colorado prison.
But the most tragic radicals were all the black people
who have been crushed in the dust over two centuries of
our bloodthirsty European Protestant genocidal history.
Quit blaming Jews and Catholics. Take a long look at the
White Anglo Saxon Protestants who pay attention to their
church once a week, smile at their neighbors, and then
build a gigantic empire on the unpaid backs of black cottonpickers.
Of course this came after those refined White Europeans
utilized every method possible to exterminate the hapless
red man first, and later got rich selling drugs to the
Chinese.
In my lifetime, a young articulate black man named Fred
Hampton sticks in my mind. A charismatic and sincere community
organizer as a teen, Fred was gunned down in a fusillade
of bullets from murderous COINTELPRO cops — while
lying in bed with no weapon. Of course in the newspapers
the next day we learned our brave cops removed a dangerous
radical from our streets. Another martyr to bogus American
justice is Native American inspiration Leonard Peltier,
jailed in Leavenworth for more than 30 years now for a
crime he didn’t commit.
Given the brief glimpse of the abbreviated political
trajectory of Fred Hampton I have to think he would have
made a wonderful president someday. Same could be said
of Leonard. These remarks make America’s nasty white
supremacists squirm. Good.
For all you effete intellectual snobs (Spiro Agnew’s
famous phrase), the radical to beat all was the cantankerous
French Situationist Guy Debord, who argued that we were
trapped in our own abstractions and had lost all meaningful
contact with the world around us, before one sad day he
put a bullet in his own head because no one could hear
what he was saying.
“Imagine there’s no countries,” John
Lennon sang shortly before he was taken out by a Bush
family religious program mind-trained assassin with six
shots to the back of the head, mmm yes, Mossad style.
Can you say Hinckley Dinckley? Oh no, that was Chapman.
Same school, though. Did I ever tell you about the time
Hinckley’s brother had dinner with Bush? Another
time, perhaps ....
“All you need is love,” Lennon prominently
sang. Now how can you argue with that, even as you contemplate
that a lot of this good will was generated as a social
experiment by (even then) Zionized social scientists in
a place called the Tavistock Institute in London, where
a bomb went off the other day, incidentally. Isn’t
that interesting?
What has always interested me about the 9/11 skeptics
movement is the almost complete absence of political dogma
among its participants. I mean, there are people from
all over the political spectrum: the Trap Rock Peace Center
to the American Patriot Friends Network. That’s
good market coverage, my friend.
But in the exact middle of the American heart in this
incredible poison: a totally locked down establishment
media monster regurgitating the twisted and clumsy lies
of sociopathic misanthropes who are butchering and poisoning
half the world while hiding behind flags and bibles. No.
I take that back. They’ve already destroyed both
of them, too.
Yes, our president, the one who OKs overnight visits
from a well-known homosexual prostitute and then puts
him in the press corps to throw gopher ball questions
at him, yes, that president, says he gets his orders from
God!
This is the best news I’ve heard about religion
in years. It tells you all exactly what religion is. Remember:
the best Bible passage is Deuteronomy 28:56-58. Look it
up. It says everything.
Thanks to George Bush and Tom Brokaw. And Charles F******
Krauthammer (the perfect Jewish name). American politics
has evolved to Howdy Doody meets Bride of Chucky, and
the most astounding thing is — obviously we can’t
seem to figure it out — is that the American people
have ACCEPTED IT!!!
They’ve accepted the destruction of the Constitution,
the routine use of torture, the total falsification of
elections, and the needless mass murders of hundreds of
thousands of South Asians in the past two years alone.
So needless to say, I’ve looked for signs of hope
that there were still actual human beings on this planet,
and certainly have found that and more in both the 9/11
skeptics movement, and especially in the wonderful people
I’ve met on the Internet, many of whom are much
smarter than me and just as concerned about the apparently
imminent destruction of most of the things we hold dear.
But the most amazing thing I have found is that virtually
all of the people rising up and being willing to consider
the frightening reality that 9/11 was an operation executed
by our government ...
... wanna buy an Arab terrorist? They’re for sale,
you know, and the CIA uses a lot of them; you occasionally
see their case files on TV for a few weeks; then a new
one is chosen as this week’s excuse for continuing
the carnage by our multi-trillion dollar war machine ....
... the most amazing thing is that all these people,
upset about government lies and needless killing, ARE
FROM THE MIDDLE OF THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM. Most are not
really political at all.
And their issues are not about godless communists or
soulless capitalists. Their issues are not about foreign
intrigues or Washington sexcapades. Their issue is about
living a good life and not having their money stolen by
criminal demagogues posing as sanctimonious philosophers.
Their issue is honesty.
The middle of the American political spectrum, totally
ignored by the corporate spin machine under the assumption
that “to go along to get along” is the political
philosophy of choice for most of its listeners, is becoming
radicalized over the issue of honesty. Under the media’s
very noses. That’s delicious.
Look under that rock in the middle of the road. Why it’s
Bill Moyers, sonafagun, and he’s saying the president
should be in jail. Naw, I must not have heard that right.
Mothers with sons dead in Iraq are at the center of this
community cyclone. They are surrounded by many millions
of thoughtful Americans who question why President Bush
didn’t permit a thoroughly and openly professional
investigation — just what they’d do for any
routine airplane crash in which people were killed —
on September 11, 2001.
Who question why the evidence was carted away unexamined,
and why New York firemen were told to clam up, or they
would lose their jobs.
Who question why the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq seem
to have been planned BEFORE 9/11 — yet later explained
away as being conducted BECAUSE of 9/11.
Who question why their sons and daughters conducted the
most horribly demented sexual experiments on their Iraqi
prisoners, including little boys, some of whom were raped
and killed. Did you see where Donald Rumsfeld testified
before Congress that the new pictures from Abu Ghraib
prison, where U.S. troops torture Iraqi captives with
electrical wires in their anuses, were simply too terrible
to look at, and we should just forget the whole thing?
Who question why Donald Rumsfeld created his own terror
squads to go into Iraq and foment violence, in order,
he said, to identify who the REAL TERRORISTS really are.
The imbedded press, of course, forgot to keep of track
of what they were doing. How many American adolescents
have been killed by Rumsfeld’s special fomenting
squads, trying to draw those rascally terrorists out of
their hideouts? That’s exactly how the Fallujah
massacre began.
Who question why Fallujah, the most hellacious and despicable
war crime of the new century, was allowed to happen, and
then the American people were prevented from seeing it
or from hearing about it. We got to see Michael Jackson
instead.
The people asking the right questions are ordinary people,
with no particular political persuasion except live and
let live.
I’ve been waiting for a long time for someone to
come along and produce what I call (and the phrase is
an important one to remember, in this age of spin) a COHERENT
MEME about 9/11, which is the key to really understanding
America’s role in the devolution of society and
its plundering of the planet.
A coherent meme.
And wouldn’t you know, two average citizens —
one a retired Bush administration official, for God’s
sake; and the other, a shy professor of theology at an
obscure West Coast college — were, amid the American
public’s terrified silence during 2002 and the following
years, able to logically and dispassionately ferret out
the significant facts from among the panicky shrieks and
emotional invective of the first wave of 9/11 skeptics,
and state clearly and unambiguously to the general public
that — well, I hope this isn’t the first time
you’ve heard this, because it surely will not be
the last — 9/11 was an inside job.
Same story with 7/7 and all those terror bombings in
between.
What is the coherent meme in all this, you ask?
Well, let’s listen to what these two unprepossessing
men, both accomplished professionals recognized in their
fields with what you might say are national reputations,
or at least as respectable high-achievers in their jobs,
actually had to say.
They are Morgan Reynolds and David Ray Griffin.
Reynolds is so Republican he was chief economist in the
Bush the Lamer’s first term. But we should never
make the mistake of thinking everybody in the government
is a money grubbing perv — even though the topmost
leaders all may be that, and worse. Listen to Reynolds
....
It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific
debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin
towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the
collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy
based on such erroneous engineering analysis will not
likely prove to be sound. Revised engineering and construction
practices, for example, based on the belief that the
twin towers collapsed through airplane damage and subsequent
fires is premature, to say the least.
More importantly, momentous political and social consequences
would follow if impartial observers concluded that professionals
imploded the WTC. If demolition destroyed three steel
skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then
the case for an "inside job" and a government
attack on America would be compelling. Meanwhile, the
job of scientists, engineers and impartial researchers
everywhere is to get the scientific and engineering
analysis of 9/11 right, "though heaven should fall."
Unfortunately, getting it right in today’s "security
state" demands daring because explosives and structural
experts have been intimidated in their analyses of the
collapses of 9/11.
So what is the coherent meme that ordinary people can
whisper to their neighbors that was stated unequivocally
by this retired professor from Texas A&M? This radical!
Erroneous engineering analysis. Experts intimidated.
Planes and fires couldn’t have knocked down the
towers. Likely conclusion? Inside job.
Maybe the paranoid and corrupt U.S. government should
begin targeting respectable white-haired college professors
instead of innocent Muslim men, because Griffin, another
retired professor (from Claremont School of Theology)
has done more damage to the criminal syndicate in Washington
than any Islamic enthusiast could ever hope to do.
Griffin’s book ....
The New Pearl Harbor reported evidence that
at least six of the alleged hijackers are still alive.
David Harrison of the Telegraph interviewed two of the
men who supposedly died on Flight 93, which crashed in
Pennsylvania, one of whom said that he "had never
even heard of Pennsylvania," let alone died there.
The Associated Press reported that Waleed al-Shehri, supposedly
on Flight 11, contacted the U.S. embassy in Morocco about
two weeks after 9/11. The 9/11 Commission Report, nevertheless,
suggested that al-Shehri was responsible for stabbing
one of the flight attendants shortly before Flight 11
crashed into the North Tower.
The New Pearl Harbor cited reports that although
Mohamed Atta, the supposed ringleader, had been portrayed
as a devout Muslim ready to meet his maker, he actually
loved alcohol, pork, and lap dances. Zelikow’s commission,
however, said that Atta had become "fanatically"
religious. They also claimed that they could find no credible
explanation as to why Atta and the other hijackers went
to Las Vegas. The mainstream press has let the Commission
get away with these obvious contradictions ....
Another big question created by the official story is
how the hijackers, by crashing planes into the Twin Towers,
caused them and Building 7 to collapse. One problem is
that Building 7 was not struck by an airplane, and steel-frame
buildings had never before been caused to collapse by
fire alone, even when the fires had been much bigger,
hotter, and longer-lasting. The Commission avoided this
problem by simply not mentioning this fact or even, incredibly,
that Building 7 collapsed.
The 9/11 Commission Report failed to mention that WTC7
collapsed. Hmm.
Another problem, which I mentioned earlier, is that the
collapses had all the standard features of controlled
demolitions. For example, all three buildings came down
at virtually free-fall speed. The Commission even alluded
to this feature, saying that the "South Tower collapsed
in 10 seconds." But it never explained how fire plus
the impact of an airplane could have produced such a collapse.
Controlled demolition was also suggested by the fact
that the collapses were total, with the 110-story Twin
Towers collapsing into a pile of rubble only a few stories
high. The core of each tower had consisted of 47 massive
steel columns, which extended from the basements through
the roofs. Even if we ignore all the other problems in
the official "pancake" theory of the collapses,
those massive steel columns should have still been sticking
up a thousand feet in the air. Zelikow’s commission
handled this problem with the audacious claim that "[t]he
interior core of the buildings was a hollow steel shaft."
The Commission said the WTC cores were hollow. Hmm.
Another example: Breaking those massive steel columns
would have required very powerful explosives. Many survivors
of the towers have reported hearing and feeling explosions.
But the 9/11 Commission failed to mention any of these
reports. William Rodriguez told the 9/11 Commission behind
closed doors about feeling and hearing a huge explosion
in the sub-basement of the North Tower, then rescuing
people from its effects, but neither his name nor any
of his testimony is found in Zelikow’s final report
In any case, as these illustrations show, the 9/11 Commission,
which had the opportunity to rebut the prima facie case
against the Bush administration, failed to do so. This
means that the publication of The 9/11 Commission Report
needs to be recognized as a decisive event, because it
was the moment at which the prima facie case against the
Bush administration became a conclusive case.
What we need now is a press that will let the American
people in on this development---which is most important,
given the fact that the official story about 9/11 has
provided the pretext for virtually every other horrible
thing this administration has done.
Do I hear a coherent meme?
The government and corporate media are covering up the
truth. The so-called hijackers remain unidentified and
unconfirmed. The Commission didn’t conduct a real
investigation. Why do you think that was?
Hmm. Reynolds and Griffin. Old guys. Members of the establishment.
These guys are radicals, and you know why? They’re
trying to tell you the truth, and most of you refuse to
hear it. You’re so enamored of your so-called security,
and so terrified of losing your meager income, that you
will permit all manner of depravity and false witness.
You will go to sleep at night counting your money, but
you won’t count the innocent dead bodies who have
been murdered in your name. That’s about the size
of it.
Except for one more quintessential, sterling example
of radical. Of people we should emulate.
Cindy Sheehan. Whose son Casey died in Iraq. Who has
been at the forefront of trying to alert the American
people that her son died for a lie, for a whole series
of lies, and people are still dying for these lies.
Once she was just an ordinary mom. Then Bush’s
lies took her son away, along with the lives of some 10,000
Americans and 140,000 Iraqi women and children in only
two years. Plus ruining countless other lives. That’s
Dubya’s legacy, along with a host of other barbaric
and inhumane deeds, including the theft of trillions of
dollars stolen from you and me and funneled to his corrupt
corporate cronies. (It really is an effective formula
for radicalizing the middle class.)
At this moment as I write, Cindy Sheehan is standing
by the side of the road in Crawford, Texas, demanding
to speak to President Bush. I just saw her on CNN, interviewed
by Wolf Blitzer, CNN’s Israeli anchorman.
She told Blitzer about the first meeting she had with
Bush, when the jovial president came into the room telling
jokes and then consoling Cindy for the loss of “her
loved one.”
“He didn’t even know my son’s name,”
Cindy told the squirming Blitzer. “And I’m
here until he comes out and talks to me.” Sheehan
told CNN that Bush’s “misguided policy”
is going to cost a lot more mothers their sons unless
the war is stopped now.
The call has gone out around the world for ordinary people,
musicians, and the news media to converge on Crawford
to hear Cindy’s story and witness Bush’s response.
For more information check out http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=7418
and check the other stories on that delightful site while
you’re there.
So ... now you know that Homeland Security should be
concentrating on suppressing American mothers who have
lost their sons to lies in Iraq.
White-haired college professors and ordinary middle-class
mothers .... these are the new radicals. Will Bush and
his criminal sycophants come up with a new policy to make
corporate America safe from them, because they are the
real threat to the people in power?
Ah, the new America. Imprisoned minds exploited by unscrupulous
killers. But the middle class radicals are emerging. And
their single overriding issue is honesty.
So I looked at that bizarre e-mail again ...
Overthrow
all the governments
all at once
International criminal syndicate
has taken control of world’s money;
honest citizens must prevent
them from destroying the world;
Lennon was right:
all borders are bogus.
Is there any reason
we can’t have an honest world?
... and suddenly it didn’t seem so radical to me
anymore.
Oh, I know, it’s presumptuous of me to speak for
people in other nations of the world, yammering Yankee
dog that I am. And for sure Americans seem to be unable
to clean up their own act, their unstoppable murder machine
sweeping around the world.
But Bush, repulsive and without redeeming social value
as he is, is still only a symptom. The real disease is
systemic.
And until that truth is addressed, Cindy will be left
crying on the side of the road, principled white-haired
grandfathers and grandmothers will become the new targets
of persecution, and young boys and girls will keep dying
needlessly.
Unless, of course, we take the advice of that strange
e-mail, and stop this self-destructive foolishness right
now.
Any chance you can honestly respond, or are you too scared?
Remember the coherent memes. It’s up to you now.
As
I said almost two years ago, arrest the president
now, and along with him his hellish herd of homicidal
harlots. You clearly see what the future holds if we don’t.
John Kaminski is a writer who lives
on the Gulf Coast of Florida whose Internet essays are
seen on hundreds of websites around the world. They have
been collected into two anthologies, “America’s
Autopsy Report” and “The Perfect Enemy.”
In addition, he has written “The Day America Died:
Why You Shouldn’t Believe the Official Story of
What Happened on September 11, 2001,” which explains
why the government’s version of that tragic day
is a lie. Due out soon are a third collection of essays,
titled “Recipe for Extinction,” and a new
chapbook on belief systems, titled “The Prison of
God.” For more information and announcement of release
dates, keep track of http://www.johnkaminski.com/
WASHINGTON - US President George
W. Bush took a political beating this weekend after
a second opinion poll, taken after a spike in US casualties
in Iraq, showed a sharp drop in public support for his
Iraq policy.
The survey by Newsweek magazine indicated
only 34 percent of Americans approved of the way Bush
was handling the situation in Iraq while 61 percent
expressed their disapproval.
The findings, made public Saturday,
represented the president's lowest rating on Iraq ever,
which thus far has hovered above the 40-percent mark.
They echoed a sampling conducted this past week by
Ipsos-Public Affairs for the Associated Press, which
indicated that just 38 percent of respondents approved
of what Bush is doing in Iraq while 59 percent disapproved
of the policies and two percent had mixed feelings about
them.
At least 38 US military personnel have died in Iraq
in the last 10 days -- in one of the deadliest outbreaks
of insurgent violence since the March 2003 US-led invasion
of the country.
Iraqi insurgents mounted one of their most spectacular
attacks on Wednesday when a powerful roadside bomb blew
up a US armored personnel carrier near the northwest
town of Haditha, killing 14 marines on board.
As of Saturday, the overall death toll for the US military
in Iraq stood at 1,823, according to the Pentagon tally.
The count did not include two US soldiers killed later
in the day in a bomb attack near Samarra.
Bush moved on Wednesday to cushion
an anticipated backlash against his policies as he assured
in a speech in Grapevine, Texas, that his administration
had "a strategy for success" in Iraq.
"And the families can know that we will honor
their loved one's sacrifice by completing the mission,
by laying the foundations for peace for generations
to come," the president said.
The Newsweek survey showed the plea
may have fallen on deaf ears.
Reflecting a gloomy mood setting in in the country,
half of those polled said the United States was losing
ground in its efforts to establish security and democracy
in Iraq. Only 40 percent had the opposite point of view.
The previously rock-solid commitment to maintaining
a US military presence in the country for as long as
it would be necessary to establish a stable and democratic
government there also appears to have been shaken.
Just 26 percent of those polled now
said they supported keeping large numbers of US military
personnel in Iraq for as long as it takes to achieve
US goals.
Thirty-eight percent argued they would support keeping
troops there less than a year while 13 percent were
willing to maintain that commitment for up to two years,
according to the survey.
As much as 12 percent said troops should be brought
home now.
Even prominent supporters of the president
are now expressing concern how the mounting US death
toll in Iraq will affect next year's congressional elections.
"When you wake up in the morning
and lose 14 marines, people say, 'What's going on?'"
Newt Gingrich, a former speaker of the House of Representatives
and now a prominent Republican ideologue told The New
York Times. "This is a very complicated equation."
Overall, a 51-percent majority now disapproves of the
way Bush is handling his job as president, up from 48
percent registered in the March, the Newsweek survey
showed.
The president's job disapproval rating in the Ipsos-Public
Affairs poll was even higher -- 55 percent.
The Newsweek poll of 1,004 adults conducted on August
2-4 had a margin of error is plus or minus four percentage
points. The margin of error for the Ipsos-Public Affairs
survey conducted August 1-3 was 3.1 percent.
Comment: Note
that the real concern of lawmakers is not that the American
people are unhappy with Bush's crusade, but rather that
congressional elections are coming up next year. Bush's
handlers will no doubt pull some strings here and there
and kick the propaganda machine up a notch, and all
will be well. Worst case, a "terrorist attack"
or "close call" should work wonders for the
Bush Reich...
By DEBORAH HASTINGS
AP National Writer
Sun Aug 7,12:17 PM ET
WASHINGTON - In the world as Bunnatine
Greenhouse sees it, people do the right thing. They
stand up for the greater good and they speak up when
things go wrong. She believes God has a purpose for
each life and she prays every day for that purpose to
be made evident. These days she is praying her heart
out, because she is in a great deal of trouble.
Bunnatine "Bunny" Greenhouse is the Principal
Assistant Responsible for Contracting ("PARC"
in the alphabet soup of military acronyms) in the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers. Lest the title fool, she is
responsible for awarding billions upon billions in taxpayers'
money to private companies hired to resurrect war-torn
Iraq and to feed, clothe, shelter and do the laundry
of American troops stationed there.
She has rained a mighty storm upon herself for standing
up, before members of Congress and live on C-SPAN to
proclaim things are just not right in this staggeringly
profitable business.
She has asked many questions: Why
is Halliburton - a giant Texas firm that holds more
than 50 percent of all rebuilding efforts in Iraq -
getting billions in contracts without competitive bidding?
Do the durations of those contracts make sense? Have
there been violations of federal laws regulating how
the government can spend its money?
Halliburton denies any wrongdoing. "These false
allegations have been recycled in the media ad nauseam,"
the company said in response to a list of e-mailed questions
from The Associated Press.
Now Bunny Greenhouse may lose her job
- and her reputation, which she spent a lifetime building.
She is a black woman in a world of mostly white men;
a 60-year-old workaholic who abides neither fools nor
frauds. But she is out of her element in this fight,
her former boss said.
"What Bunny is caught up in is politics of the
highest damn order," said retired Gen. Joe Ballard,
who hired Greenhouse and headed the Corps until 2000.
"This is real hardball they're playing here. Bunny
is a procurement officer, she's not a politician. She's
not trained to do this."
Greenhouse has known for a long time that her days
may be numbered. Her needling of contracts awarded to
Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown & Root (KBR)
predated the war in Iraq, beginning with costs she said
were spiraling "out of control" from a 2000
Bosnia contract to service U.S. troops. From 1995 to
2000, Halliburton's CEO was Dick Cheney, who left to
run for vice president. He maintains his former company
has not received preferential treatment from the government.
Since then, she had questioned both
the amounts and the reasons for giving KBR tremendous
contracts in the buildup to invading Iraq. At first
she was ignored, she said. Then she was cut out of the
decision-making process.
Last October 6, she was summoned to the office of her
boss. Major Gen. Robert Griffin, the Corps' deputy commander,
was demoting her, he told her, taking away her Senior
Executive Service status and sending her to midlevel
management. Not unlike being cast out of the office
of bank president into the cubicle of branch manager.
Griffin declined to be interviewed by the AP.
Her performance was poor, said a letter
he presented. This was a surprise. Her previous job
evaluations had been exemplary, she said. The basic
theme was that she was "difficult," and "nobody
likes you," she said.
If she didn't want the new position,
she could always retire with full benefits, the letter
noted.
Over my dead body, said Greenhouse.
"I took an oath of office. I took those words
that I was going to protect the interests of my government
and my country. So help me God," she says. "And
nobody. Has the right. To take away my privilege. To
serve my government. Nobody."
She has hired lawyer Michael Kohn, who successfully
represented Linda Tripp in her claim that the Pentagon
leaked personal information after she secretly taped
Monica Lewinsky's confessions of a sexual affair with
President Bill Clinton.
Two weeks after Greenhouse's trip to the woodshed,
Kohn wrote an 11-page letter to the acting Secretary
of the Army, requesting an independent investigation
of "improper action that favored KBR's interests."
He also asked that his client be protected against
retaliation under whistleblower statutes.
Then he reminded the Army secretary of Federal Acquisition
Requirement 3.101: "Government business shall be
conducted in a manner above reproach ... with complete
impartiality and with preferential treatment for none."
The status of an independent investigation by the Defense
Department is unclear. "As a matter of policy,
we do not comment on open and ongoing investigations,"
said Pentagon spokeswoman Lt. Col. Rose-Ann Lynch.
Halliburton is also under federal investigation for
alleged favoritism by the Bush administration.
FBI agents questioned Greenhouse for
nine hours last November about that probe. In March,
a former employee was indicted for taking bribes while
working for KBR in Iraq.
Company spokeswoman Melissa Norcross said KBR has "delivered
vital services for U.S. troops and the Iraqi people
at a fair and reasonable cost, given the circumstances."
Meanwhile, Greenhouse has been placed under a 3-month
performance review ending in September.
When Gen. Ballard hired her in 1997
she was overqualified - three master's degrees and more
than 20 years of contracting experience in private industry,
the Army and the Pentagon.
"She is probably the most professional person
I've ever met, " Ballard said. "And she plays
it straight. That created problems for her after I left."
Ballard used her, he said, to help him revolutionize
the Corps - by ending the old-boys practice of awarding
contracts to a favored few, and by imposing private
industry standards on a mammoth, 230-year-old government
agency with 35,000 workers. He felt the Corps, which
had overseen everything from building hydroelectric
dams to the Soo Locks to the Manhattan Project, needed
a hard boot into the new age of contracting.
"The Corps is a tough organization. And I'll tell
you, it's not easy to be a woman in this organization,
and a black one at that," said Ballard, who was
the first black leader of the Corps.
He is not optimistic about her future.
"I think you can put a fork in
it," he said. "Her career is done."
At Corps headquarters, few speak to her, she said,
and her bosses write down what she says at departmental
meetings.
Sometimes, as she walks down a hall,
someone will mutter, "Go for it, Bunny," or
"Give 'em hell," she said. "They pass
by saying this while they're looking straight ahead,"
she recounted, and chuckled.
In a city where politics is everything, including blood
sport, she refuses to play. Right down to her clothes.
Bunny Greenhouse does not subscribe to the Capitol
chic of a dowdy
Janet Reno jacket and skirt or a boxy Hillary Clinton
suit with buttons the size of quarters. On a sweltering
summer day, seated in her lawyer's Georgetown office,
Greenhouse wears a vibrant pink-and-black shirt, tight-fitting
trousers with creases that could cut butter, and a blazer
with a shredded-fabric flower.
Her bag - overflowing with files, papers, pens, wallet,
cell phone - rivals the weight of a bound copy of the
federal budget.
Underestimate her at your peril.
"I have never gone along to get along. And I'm
willing to suffer the consequences," she said.
Her contracting staff was sharply reduced,
she said, and her superiors have gone behind her back,
most notably in issuing an emergency waiver - on a day
she was out of the office - that allowed KBR to ignore
requests from Department of Defense auditors who issued
a draft report in 2003 concluding KBR overcharged the
government $61 million for fuel in Iraq.
"They knew I would never have signed it,"
she said.
The Army Corps of Engineers declined to comment on
Greenhouse's complaints. "It's a personnel matter,"
said Corps spokeswoman Carol Sanders. "We're not
going to go point-by-point with Ms. Greenhouse's accusations.
"They want me out," Greenhouse said.
In her job, Greenhouse is mandated by Congress to get
the best quality at the cheapest price from the most
qualified supplier. Over her objections, KBR was awarded
three multibillion-dollar war-related contracts, two
of them without competitive bidding.
Together, they are worth as much as $20 billion - the
entire cost of the Manhattan Project, adjusted to today's
dollars.
Greenhouse's most strenuous complaints were over the
Restore Iraqi Oil contract, estimated at $7 billion,
originally planned to handle oil field fires that might
be started by Saddam Hussein's troops. When that failed
to happen, it morphed into an agreement to repair oil
fields and import fuel for civilians and soldiers.
The contract was given to KBR in March 2003. In Greenhouse's
view, that process violated federal regulations concerning
fair and open bidding. Halliburton denies that.
A month before KBR got the contract - and three weeks
before the U.S. invaded Iraq - she had demanded KBR
officials be ejected from a Pentagon meeting attended
by high-ranking officials from the Corps and the Defense
Department. "They should not have been there,"
she said. "We were discussing the terms of the
contract."
Later, she would tell Democratic members of Congress:
"The abuse related to contracts awarded to KBR
represents the most blatant and improper contract abuse
I have ever witnessed during the course of my professional
career."
At the Corps, Greenhouse said she was told KBR was
the only qualified firm.
With the country on the brink of war, she reluctantly
signed the RIO contract. But next to her signature,
she boldly wrote an objection to the only thing she
felt she could challenge - the contract's length, five
years. One year would have been more than fair, she
said. After that, it should have been put out for bid
among contractors with top security clearances.
"I caution that extending this sole source contract
beyond a one-year period could convey an invalid perception
that there is not strong intent for a limited competition,"
she penned in neat cursive.
In June, she was asked to testify before the Democratic
Policy Committee - formed by Democrats who said their
efforts to get the Republican-controlled Congress to
investigate alleged war profiteering had been repeatedly
denied.
She was joined by a former Halliburton employee who
said KBR fed spoiled food to American troops and charged
the government for thousands of meals it never served.
Halliburton would not specifically address the former
employee's claims. Norcross said taking care of troops
is "our priority."
"I thought she was very courageous to come forward
and blow the whistle," Rep. Henry Waxman of California
said of Greenhouse. "The administration ran around
her and ignored her. We owe her a debt of gratitude."
And if she is forced out?
"I would find that outrageous," Waxman replied.
"They should be promoting her."
Greenhouse is a registered independent. Her husband,
Aloyisus Greenhouse, is retired after a long Army career
as a senior procurement officer. They have three grown
children.
Bunny grew up in the segregated South, where her parents
taught her and her siblings to be proud and hardworking.
Her brother is Elvin Hayes, the Hall of Fame basketball
player. She followed her husband's military postings,
moving and moving and then moving again. In each place
she found her own way, and her own job.
Her husband watches what is happening to her and tries
to bite his lip.
"Bunny has a lot of faith. She
really believes that someone will stand up and say,
'This is wrong.' But I don't think a person exists like
that in the Department of Defense."
But in her world, Bunny Greenhouse's faith still beams.
"I simply believe that we have callings and purposes
in this life. I walk through this life for a purpose.
I wake up every day for a purpose. And every day I say,
'Here I am. Send me.' "
Comment: It's
too bad there aren't more people like Bunny Greenhouse
in the halls of power...
NEW YORK - It was bound to happen
sooner or later, and in what newspapers in Kentucky
are calling a first, one American has killed another
in a dispute over the Iraq war.
It happened at Floyd County flea market on Thursday,
when two friends, who were firearms vendors there, drew
guns after quarreling about the war. Douglas
Moore, 65, of Martin, who backs the war, shot and killed
Harold Wayne Smith, 56, of Manchester, who opposed it,
according to investigators.
Moore was released without being charged after he convinced
police he had acted in self-defense. A grand jury may
yet hear evidence in the case.
Commonwealth's Attorney Brent Turner said the episode
might mark the first death in the U.S. due to a dispute
over the war.
One witness, Sam Hamman of Prestonsburg, told the Lexington
Herald-Leader, "Harold was talking about the 14
people that were killed in Iraq the other day and Doug
said that just as many people were killed on the highways
here."
This quickly escalated into an argument, then to a
scuffle, and finally both men drew pistols outside a
snack shed. The dead man was apparently just a little
slower in firing. Witnesses said he stood for about
five seconds before toppling on the walkway.
In a telephone interview with the Lexington paper yesterday,
Moore said police had told him not to discuss his feelings
about the Iraq war.
"I'm sorry this has happened," Moore, a retired
railroad worker, said. "But then what's done can't
be undone." Moore told the Lexington reporter he
thinks Smith and his family knew him well enough "to
know what my thoughts are, his family does, because
me and Harold was friends. That's all I'll say."
The daughter of the dead man said the two men were
friends and had discussed Iraq before. She said her
father "had different opinions than everybody.
He felt it was wrong that all of these young people
were losing their lives over what was going on. It was
just a political disagreement, like a whole lot of people
have."
Comment: Well,
it's happened: the pro-Bush and anti-Bush crowds have
started shooting at each other. While the American populace
is busy arguing with and shooting at each other, Bush
and the gang will just slither onward with their plans.
By Bradley Graham
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, August 8, 2005; A01
COLORADO SPRINGS -- The U.S. military
has devised its first-ever war plans for guarding against
and responding to terrorist attacks in the United States,
envisioning 15 potential crisis scenarios and anticipating
several simultaneous strikes around the country, according
to officers who drafted the plans.
The classified plans, developed here at Northern Command
headquarters, outline a variety of possible roles for
quick-reaction forces estimated
at as many as 3,000 ground troops per attack,
a number that could easily grow depending on the extent
of the damage and the abilities of civilian response
teams.
The possible scenarios range from "low
end," relatively modest crowd-control missions
to "high-end," full-scale disaster management
after catastrophic attacks such as the release of a
deadly biological agent or the explosion of a radiological
device, several officers said.
Some of the worst-case scenarios involve three attacks
at the same time, in keeping with a Pentagon directive
earlier this year ordering Northcom, as the command
is called, to plan for multiple simultaneous attacks.
The war plans represent a historic shift for the Pentagon,
which has been reluctant to become involved in domestic
operations and is legally constrained from engaging
in law enforcement. Indeed, defense
officials continue to stress that they intend for the
troops to play largely a supporting role in homeland
emergencies, bolstering police, firefighters and other
civilian response groups.
But the new plans provide for what
several senior officers acknowledged is the likelihood
that the military will have to take charge in some situations,
especially when dealing with mass-casualty attacks that
could quickly overwhelm civilian resources.
"In my estimation, [in the event of] a biological,
a chemical or nuclear attack in any of the 50 states,
the Department of Defense is best positioned -- of the
various eight federal agencies that would be involved
-- to take the lead," said Adm. Timothy J. Keating,
the head of Northcom, which coordinates military involvement
in homeland security operations.
The plans present the Pentagon
with a clearer idea of the kinds and numbers of troops
and the training that may be required to build a more
credible homeland defense force. They come at
a time when senior Pentagon officials are engaged in
an internal, year-long review of force levels and weapons
systems, attempting to balance the heightened requirements
of homeland defense against the heavy demands of overseas
deployments in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.
Keating expressed confidence that existing military
assets are sufficient to meet homeland security needs.
Maj. Gen. Richard J. Rowe, Northcom's chief operations
officer, agreed, but he added that "stress points"
in some military capabilities probably would result
if troops were called on to deal with multiple homeland
attacks.
Debate and Analysis
Several people on the staff here and at the Pentagon
said in interviews that the debate and analysis within
the U.S. government regarding the extent of the homeland
threat and the resources necessary to guard against
it remain far from resolved.
The command's plans consist of two main documents.
One, designated CONPLAN 2002 and consisting of more
than 1,000 pages, is said to be a sort of umbrella document
that draws together previously issued orders for homeland
missions and covers air, sea and land operations. It
addresses not only post-attack responses but also prevention
and deterrence actions aimed at intercepting threats
before they reach the United States.
The other, identified as CONPLAN 0500, deals specifically
with managing the consequences of attacks represented
by the 15 scenarios.
CONPLAN 2002 has passed a review by the Pentagon's
Joint Staff and is due to go soon to Defense Secretary
Donald H. Rumsfeld and top aides for further study and
approval, the officers said. CONPLAN 0500 is still undergoing
final drafting here. (CONPLAN stands for "concept
plan" and tends to be an abbreviated version of
an OPLAN, or "operations plan," which specifies
forces and timelines for movement into a combat zone.)
The plans, like much else about Northcom, mark a new
venture by a U.S. military establishment still trying
to find its comfort level with the idea of a greater
homeland defense role after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Military officers and civilian Pentagon policymakers
say they recognize, on one hand, that the armed forces
have much to offer not only in numbers of troops but
also in experience managing crises and responding to
emergencies. On the other hand, they worry that too
much involvement in homeland missions would diminish
the military's ability to deal with threats abroad.
The Pentagon's new homeland defense strategy, issued
in June, emphasized in boldface type that "domestic
security is primarily a civilian law enforcement function."
Still, it noted the possibility
that ground troops might be sent into action on U.S.
soil to counter security threats and deal with major
emergencies.
"For the Pentagon to acknowledge that it would
have to respond to catastrophic attack and needs a plan
was a big step," said James Carafano, who follows
homeland security issues for the Heritage Foundation,
a conservative Washington think tank.
William M. Arkin, a defense specialist who has reported
on Northcom's war planning, said the evolution of the
Pentagon's thinking reflects the recognition of an obvious
gap in civilian resources.
Since Northcom's inception in
October 2002, its headquarters staff has grown to about
640 members, making it larger than the Southern Command,
which oversees operations in Latin America, but smaller
than the regional commands for Europe, the Middle East
and the Pacific.A brief
tour late last month of Northcom's operations center
at Peterson Air Force Base found officers monitoring
not only aircraft and ship traffic around the United
States but also the Discovery space shuttle mission,
the National Scout Jamboree in Virginia, several border
surveillance operations and a few forest firefighting
efforts.
'Dual-Use' Approach
Pentagon authorities have rejected the idea of creating
large standing units dedicated to homeland missions.
Instead, they favor a "dual-use" approach,
drawing on a common pool of troops trained both for
homeland and overseas assignments.
Particular reliance is being placed
on the National Guard, which is expanding a network
of 22-member civil support teams to all states and forming
about a dozen 120-member regional response units. Congress
last year also gave the Guard expanded authority under
Title 32 of the U.S. Code to perform such homeland missions
as securing power plants and other critical facilities.
But the Northcom commander can quickly call on active-duty
forces as well. On top of previous powers to send fighter
jets into the air, Keating earlier this year gained
the authority to dispatch Navy and Coast Guard ships
to deal with suspected threats off U.S. coasts. He also
has immediate access to four active-duty Army battalions
based around the country, officers here said.
Nonetheless, when it comes to ground
forces possibly taking a lead role in homeland operations,
senior Northcom officers remain reluctant to discuss
specifics. Keating said such situations, if they arise,
probably would be temporary, with lead responsibility
passing back to civilian authorities.
Military exercises code-named Vital Archer, which involve
troops in lead roles, are shrouded in secrecy. By contrast,
other homeland exercises featuring troops in supporting
roles are widely publicized.
Legal Questions
Civil liberties groups have warned that the military's
expanded involvement in homeland defense could bump
up against the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which restricts
the use of troops in domestic law enforcement. But Pentagon
authorities have told Congress they see no need to change
the law.
According to military lawyers
here, the dispatch of ground troops would most likely
be justified on the basis of the president's authority
under Article 2 of the Constitution to serve as commander
in chief and protect the nation. The Posse Comitatus
Act exempts actions authorized by the Constitution.
"That would be the place we would start from"
in making the legal case, said Col. John Gereski, a
senior Northcom lawyer.
But Gereski also said he knew of no
court test of this legal argument, and Keating left
the door open to seeking an amendment of the Posse Comitatus
Act.
One potentially tricky area, the admiral said, involves
National Guard officers who are put in command of task
forces that include active-duty as well as Guard units
-- an approach first used last year at the Group of
Eight summit in Georgia. Guard
troops, acting under state control, are exempt from
Posse Comitatus prohibitions.
"It could be a challenge for the commander who's
a Guardsman, if we end up in a fairly complex, dynamic
scenario," Keating said. He
cited a potential situation in which Guard units might
begin rounding up people while regular forces could
not.
The command's sensitivity to
legal issues, Gereski said, is reflected in the unusually
large number of lawyers on staff here -- 14 compared
with 10 or fewer at other commands. One lawyer
serves full time at the command's Combined Intelligence
and Fusion Center, which joins military analysts with
law enforcement and counterintelligence specialists
from such civilian agencies as the FBI, the CIA and
the Secret Service.
A senior supervisor at the facility said the staff
there does no intelligence collection, only analysis.
He also said the military operates
under long-standing rules intended to protect civilian
liberties. The rules, for instance, block military access
to intelligence information on political dissent or
purely criminal activity.
Even so, the center's lawyer is called
on periodically to rule on the appropriateness of some
kinds of information-sharing. Asked how frequently such
cases arise, the supervisor recalled two in the previous
10 days, but he declined to provide specifics.
Comment: Note
the comment that the current planning is for military
intervention for everything from a catastrophic attack
on US soil all the way down to basic crowd control.
In other words, the military will have an increasing
roll in civilian law enforcement. All that will be required
is Bush's approval, and the troops will be deployed.
US borders are being tightened as the populace is scared
into avoiding travel outside the country. The Patriot
Act has been renewed for ten years. Now Bush will have
the power to deploy the military on US soil whenever
he wishes.
And all of this is occurring even as Bush's popularity
among the American people plummets...
Last Updated Mon, 08 Aug 2005
06:32:18 EDT
CBC News
One of Canada's top
generals predicts Canadian troops will likely have to
stay in Afghanistan for at least a generation to help
that country break out of "a cycle of warlords and
tribalism."
The remarks came from Maj.-Gen. Andrew Leslie to the
Couchiching Summer Conference on Sunday in Orillia, Ont.,
north of Toronto.
"Afghanistan is a 20-year venture,"
Leslie said.
But, he said, the commitment is a necessary one.
'Worth fighting for'
"There are things worth fighting for. There are
things worth dying for. There are things worth killing
for," Leslie said, in remarks reported in Monday's
Toronto Star newspaper.
Still, he warned that Canadians should be prepared for
a long mission, that could cost lives.
"Every time you kill an angry young
man overseas, you're creating 15 more who will come after
you," he said.
Leslie's remarks echo comments made earlier this summer
by Chief of Defence Staff Gen. Rick Hillier.
He, too, warned that Canadians should prepare for military
casualties.
By sending troops to Afghanistan, Canada is actually
protecting itself, at least in the long run, he said in
July.
As many as 1,250 Canadian soldiers will be serving in
the country by February 2006.
About 250 Canadian soldiers will be sent to the volatile
Kandahar region this month. Some have already begun patrolling
the streets of Kandahar, getting to know the Afghan city
before taking on their new mission in the southern provinces.
American officials have warned of al-Qaeda attacks in
the region.
By Donville Myrie
Awareness Alert! article
phi-spiral.com
There used to be "happiness"
in the world.
While acknowledging the stark
subjectivity of this statement, a practical understanding
could be gained from the fact that most people remember
a time when the future did NOT seem so clear. Optimism
for a 'good' future was the underpinning of one's waking
consciousness in the accepted world of socio-economical
struggles, no matter what side of the coin you stood.
Over one-hundred years of steady technological progress
has led to numerous economic opportunities, creating in-roads
that touch the lives of every human being alive today.
As seductive as it's addictive, it inspired dreams of
new possibilities, and promised new achievements for the
individual unheard of by their predecessors.
The 'American Dream' of picket fences, two car garages,
tree-lined neighborhoods, and 2.5 children, does not seem
so entirely attainable anymore. The 'Pursuit of Happiness'
as has become understood by most of the world's population
as an inalienable right, has degenerated somehow into
a strangely perplexing, futile mental exercise. Something
profound is happening; ..there seems to be a new element
introduced into the equation - an anomalous weed has taken
root in the garden. The collective psyche of the average
human being seem to be suffering from something akin to
a traumatic criminal assault. A crime so heinous and unimaginable,
that almost everyone is still reeling from its resulting
dementia.
General optimism has been replaced by a pervasive and
nebulous din. An ever-present background radiation of
unsettlement, that contrasts sharply against all personal
enjoyments. Even the upbeat imagery of commercials, and
the mind numbing panacea of popular entertainment has
lost it's edge to completely hold our focus. Moreover,
even such tried and true spoon fed placebos as 'easy credit'
and over optimistic economic forecasts cannot overwrite
this awareness of a creeping shadow drawing near. What
in the world is this "thing", and what could've
caused its appearance? For those of us who're able to
think this deeply, these are logical and sensible questions.
However the answers should not be expected without preparation,
because they could be firmly entrenched in areas where
the light of imagination may not have shone.
The public mind as it is conditioned
to be, is a very fragile thing. Easily whipped into a
state of disorienting mass frenzy, its natural tendency
will be to frantically look for a point of focus to regain
its balance. It will look for rational explanations, and
will accept a solid lie if presented with an air of plausibility.
If blame is inserted at the optimal time after the shock
of a national tragedy for example, the mind will focus
and imprint on this idea. Even if evidence is not forthcoming,
this idea could be developed further into what would be
in effect, a phantom or bogeyman. It is important to know
that many of these occurrences are quite deliberate and
used throughout history to effect change. Random acts
of terror are usually not what they appear to be - random.
Targets are carefully chosen to maximize public horror
and outrage. The public mind has been carefully conditioned
by twisted truth and truncated histories, to believe that
'terroristic acts against humanity' is a crime committed
by radicals, and OTHER governments against OTHER peoples.
Conditioning prevents the public from ever conceptualizing
the resolve and lengths THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT would go
to institute a policy.
Before World War II, the burning
of the Reichstag in Nazi Germany is a good example,
and is said to be the defining incident which incited
the German population to embrace war. How would this historical
event seem to us now, if proof suddenly came to light
incriminating the NAZIS themselves of orchestrating this
fraud against its own people? Why would they do this you
ask? Maybe a clue was revealed after the war, from the
testimony of Nazi General, Herman Goering during his trial
at Nuremberg in 1946:
"Of course the people don't want
war... That is understood. But... it's always a simple
matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy,
a fascist dictatorship, a parliament, or a communist
dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always
be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy.
All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked,
and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger. It works the same in
any country."
Since 9/11, the Madrid bombings, and now the recent
carnage in London, our collective focus has been manipulated
to imagine a monster. A shadowy and vastly superior entity
of unlimited resolve, unimaginably hell bent on destroying
you, your family, and modern civilization. With tentacles
reaching under every bed, this monster is so huge... but
strangely cannot be seen; so infinitely wealthy... but
illogically finances in a manner that cannot be traced.
So omnipresent, it's offspring is spawned behind every
wall, and amidst all defenses against it. So smart is
this beast, it out thinks the combined intelligence of
the world's top analysts. Its lair can be located with
some effort by an astute reporter, but fades in the desert
like a lit candle held up to the sun when subjected to
the multi-trillion dollar gaze of the all powerful American
war machine.
Tangible evidence is never needed
because fear is not dependent on proof, so terror
from helplessness results and will remain the underlying
presence felt by everyone. This all consuming misdirected
terror of an imaginary phantom, is redirected to its "nothingness"
by the clever manipulations of the REAL MONSTERS themselves.
These are the works of truly nefarious and cowardly persons
in our leadership, being influenced and supported by other
dark forces with a specific agenda. An agenda requiring
the orchestration of the systematic disempowerment of
the world's peoples while it clandestinely installs it's
diabolical order. An order where the rules of civilized
behavior is turned upside down in favor of open conquest,
destruction, genocide, dehumanization, rape, and theft.
An order of treachery, created by swindling power from
the people by deceiving them into giving up their Rights,
thus placing 'public stewardship' firmly into the hands
of these cowardly few. This is in fact what is happening
in the United States and other Allied Nations as we speak.
Have you ever wondered how such an "invisible and
bloodless coup" can be accomplished? Through loopholes
and ambiguities built into law, designed to provide plausible
footholds to manipulative interests. What is now needed
is the proper crisis situation, and this is where Pschological
Operations has its forte. The utilization of deeply emotional
staged crisises provide the necessary diversionary measure
needed to fabricate plausible blame, of which public acceptance
is the 'Trojan Horse' for unleashing draconian laws.
The American Federal Emergency
Management Agency's (FEMA) laws, are designed in such
a way to allow the authorities to maximize aid to an afflicted
area. It does this by in effect, suspending Constitutional
Rights in the region afflicted by catastrophic disaster
so that ALL resources can be legally utilized to rapidly
return normalcy to the region. Sometimes it takes extreme
measures such as 'martial law' and the utilization of
the armed forces and such to accomplish this work. Constitutional
Rights are then returned to the region when its 'Federal
Emergency' status is lifted. Since September 11th, 2001,
a state of 'Federal Emergency' has been enacted over the
entire United States, and has not been lifted since. This
single act effectively turns the country into a national
security state, secretly disconnecting the government
from all obligations and binds to Constitutional Law.
It allows those in power to pursue their own interests
at the tremendous expense of the American People under
the guise of national security measures with inspiring
names like "Patriot Act" and "Homeland
Security", and cloaked in false pursuits of "Spreading
Democracy" and "Fighting Terrorism".
The blind acceptance of the message triggered by these
powerfully subjective patriotic phrases, increases the
palatability of our changing objective reality. A reality
of eroded rights, where Reporters cannot report the truth,
being different is equal to being a terrorist, being monitored
by the government for no reason is now standard practice,
five-year olds are being arrested like adults, books disappearing
from libraries, soldiers appearing in the streets, random
police searches, creation of 'free speech' zones for protesters,
torture being used as official policy, indefinite detention
with no legal counsel, children encouraged to spy on parents,
not to mention the straight out lying by the President
leading to illegal war leaving hundreds of thousands dead,
the deafening silence of non-opposition from other elected
officials, the unchallenged conflicts of interests allowing
officials in the Executive branch to personally profit
in their illegal war and so on.
You may ask; "Is it too late to do something? How
can I make a difference?" Taking a stand is the first
step to making a difference, and the most important step
to this position is the KNOWING that it is not contingent
on the opinions of others. This simple heretical stance
is firmly among the things feared the most by the ruling
classes. The fact of the matter is that most people have
not chosen. They only THINK they've made choices, responding
instead like mindless machines to hugely subjective image/idea
laden rhetoric disguised as truth, such as patriotic/nationalistic
speech, ideas suggesting close affinity with the Divine,
ideas of imminent domain or supreme right, ideas of racial/idealistic/religio
supremacy, and so on.
The power to effect change comes
down to the level of INDIVIDUAL choice. The ability for
the individual to see TRUTH, is arguably the most sublimely
liberating personal experience that is humanly possible,
so persuasion from the masses should be recognized and
guarded against. What needs to change is the individual's
perspective and inward response to the situation at hand.
On the one hand, the deception you see may seem so far
gone, so huge of an issue that nothing can be done. A
slightly different perspective may shed more light on
this personal issue.
Here are three ways of looking at it:
1. I accept everything that's happening as a normal,
unavoidable progression of life.
2. I see questionable things happening but I accept
this, for what is the use to try and fight it?
3. I CHOOSE the stance that the stronger must dominate
the weak, and what I see is just a manifestation of natural
law.
4. I CHOOSE to make a stand on the side of TRUTH based
on objective evidence, no matter what this is, and not
be manipulated into how to think or feel based on subjectivity.
I personally have chosen the fourth option because I
am fed up with being lied to. Everywhere I look, I see
people dying, starving, stolen from, and I KNOW that I'm
being lied to about it. I see our troops returning home
with horrible injuries and radiation poisoning from Depleted
Uranium ordinance, and on the other side I see an administration
so smug and confident in its lying, that it didn't even
bother to FAKE evidence to justify its murderous rampage.
I ask ALL of you to sincerely ask yourselves, when is
it going to be enough?
"The loss of liberty at home is to be charged
to the provisions against danger, real or imagined,
from abroad."
.."If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy."
..
Aug. 8 (Bloomberg) --
An earthquake with a magnitude of 5.6 shook Tokyo and
Yokohama at 1:06 a.m. today, the U.S. Geological Survey
said.
The quake registered a maximum of 4 on the seven-level
Japanese intensity scale in Yokohama and a level of 3
in Tokyo and parts of nearby Chiba prefecture, the Japan
Meteorological Agency said on its Web site.
The earthquake was centered about 40 kilometers (25 miles)
underground, near the east coast of Honshu, Japan's biggest
island, about 100 miles northeast of Tokyo, the U.S. organization
reported on its Web site.
A tremor that registers in the 4 range on the meteorological
agency's intensity scale rattles shelves and can topple
loose objects. It isn't strong enough to cause major damage
or casualties.
A
team of scientists and volunteers will descend on Colorado
Springs this month to search for evidence of a monster
asteroid they believe smashed into Mexico’s Yucatan
Peninsula about 65.5 million years ago.
Many scientists believe the asteroid caused an eruption
of ash that blanketed the planet and created an environmental
holocaust that wiped out most life on the planet, including
dinosaurs.
The ash, with its unique space dust, crystals and soot
from global fires, is said to have eventually compressed
into a layer of clay that circled the Earth and now lies
buried beneath 65 million years of sedimentary rock.
A team from the Denver Museum of Nature and Science says
it has found evidence of the clay and its asteroid ash
in Colorado Springs and the surrounding region. They hope
a three-day dig this month will produce more proof.
“We are studying all the rock underlying the city,”
said Kirk Johnson, chief curator of paleontology at the
Denver museum.
Scientists believe the asteroid was about six miles in
diameter — imagine a space rock the size of the
Air Force Academy grounds — moving at 20,000 mph.
When the asteroid hit, scientists believe,
the impact was catastrophic, superheating the Earth’s
atmosphere and incinerating all large forms of animal
life including dinosaurs, large mammals and 50 percent
of all insect and plant life.
“It really kind of wrecked the
planet,” Johnson said.
The asteroid’s impact left a crater upward of 100
miles wide — about the distance from Denver to Pueblo.
Scientists believe they have discovered the crater 200
miles west of Cancun beneath millions of years of sediment
on the tip of the Yucatan Peninsula and in the waters
of the Gulf of Mexico.
The impact also caused an eruption of ash and debris
that, according to theory, swept across the Earth, eventually
choking out sunlight, lowering the global temperature,
contributing to acid rain and other dramatic climatic
changes.
It’s only a theory; many scientists dismiss it
in favor of a theory that volcanic eruptions are to blame
for the cataclysmic loss of animal and plant life and
disruption of the global climate.
But Johnson believes it was an asteroid,
and he’s among a large number of scientists who
search the globe for the layer of clay with its unique
space dust, quartz crystals fractured by massive force
and soot from fires that resulted from the impact.
That’s what Johnson and a team of a dozen or so
scientists, students and volunteers will be searching
for in Colorado Springs.
The key is finding the layer laced with iridium, an extremely
rare metallic chemical element similar to platinum.
Two sources of iridium exist. It is found in the Earth’s
core, brought to the surface in eruptions of certain types
of volcanoes. And it is found in space rock, like meteors
and asteroids, and the cosmic dust that constantly showers
Earth’s atmosphere.
The theory is difficult to prove because, generally,
the layer of clay is buried deep below the Earth’s
surface.
Except in Colorado Springs and other places where the
Earth’s crust has been disturbed by uplift and erosion.
Here, the clay can be found at the surface or just below.
It’s often unearthed by construction of roads, buildings
and homes.
That’s because the uplift that created the Rocky
Mountains pushed layers of prehistoric rock to the surface,
especially in places such as Garden of the Gods and the
Pulpit Rock area of the Austin Bluffs Open Space.
The Springs’ topography gives scientists access
to rock as deep as the Pierre Shale formation, which dates
to 70 million years ago, and Fox Hills, a layer of ancient
beach deposits from a time when Colorado was covered by
an ocean.
Then comes the distinctive iridium-laced clay, which
is 65.5 million years old and separates the Cretaceous
period — the last age of dinosaurs — from
the Tertiary/Paleocene, when mammals became the dominant
species on Earth.
Above those layers are the Laramie and Dawson formations,
which are only about 55 million years old.
In recent years, Johnson’s team discovered the
clay in an outcropping east of Kiowa in Elbert County.
“We actually found the layer where the dinosaurs
went extinct,” said Beth Ellis, project manager
of Johnson’s team. “You could put your finger
on it. It was really cool.”
There have been specific discoveries in the Springs,
Ellis said.
For example, a student working on private property got
“within a few feet” of pinpointing the clay
layer at a site near the proposed Jimmy Camp Creek reservoir
northeast of the Colorado Springs Airport. The student
found rock from the thicker layers above and below the
thin clay layer. But more work is needed to unearth the
clay, Ellis said.
Previous expeditions to Colorado Springs have led scientists
back to the Pulpit Rock area, as well.
“It takes a couple years to get a good understanding
of an area,” Ellis said. “Then we go back
and look hard. That’s when it gets fun.”
The fun will start Aug. 28 when the team returns, Ellis
said. It will visit Pulpit Rock, a road construction site
near Garden of the Gods Road and, perhaps, the Jimmy Camp
Creek site.
Along the way, scientists expect to unearth other fossils,
like they did a few years ago when a prehistoric crocodile
skull was found.
“We’ve been doing work in Colorado Springs
since 1991,” Johnson said. “We amped that
work up in the late 1990s. It’s a really interesting
project. We’ve found some pretty interesting, cool
fossils there. We’re excited about it.”