As many of you know,
Signs of the Times is not supported by major funding like
many other news sites, and is not affiliated with any
government, political group, corporation, or news agency.
SOTT is financed by any donations we receive as well as
money out of our own pockets. The benefit of this setup
is that we do not have any sponsors that might introduce
unwanted bias into our work. The
obvious and major drawback is that we do not have the
funding to do all the things we would like to do for our
readers.
Almost one year ago, SOTT created the P3nt4gon Str!ke presentation, which has now been viewed by
well over 300,000,000 people worldwide, and is available
in nine different languages. Recently, we wrote and produced
the song You
Lied, performed by Away
With the Fairys. We also recorded our first ever podcast,
beginning a project which we had been trying to get off
the ground for over a year.
A
SOTT editor poses next to his computer
To produce the Signs page, we work very long days (often
upwards of 14-16 hours) without pay. We do it because
we love it, and because our readers often write to tell
us how they have benefited from our work. In order to
continue expanding our work and deepen our analysis and
understanding of our world, we need to enlarge our library.
There are many books we would like to have that we cannot
afford. With our increasing use of sound files and our
future projects that include video, we have and will continue
to incur higher bandwidth costs. As well, the Signs page
and related projects are created on several computers
which are each upwards of five years old. They are very
slow, increasingly unreliable, and won't support regular
podcasts and videos.
Unfortunately, we do not have the financial means to
purchase the books we need, much less new equipment. Current
donations only support our basic needs and living expenses.
In order to continue producing the Signs page, the podcast,
Flash presentations, and expand our operations further,
we need your support.
At the moment, we are preparing six Signs of the
Times Commentary books. These books are collections
of SOTT commentary grouped according to theme. They will
be available for sale soon, and any proceeds will go towards
helping to cover our increasing operating costs.
Our target, based on estimated costs for all the necessary
materials, upgrades, and operating costs for the coming
year is 28,000 euros.
--
Here's How You Can Help Signs of the Times --
Any donation you
can make will help us to continue to produce and improve
the Signs page.
If you donate 50 euros
(approximately US$60; click
here for current exchange rate), you will be a Bronze
Supporter.
Bronze
Supporters will receive a complementary
copy of the 911 Conspiracy Signs
Commentary book.
If you donate 100
euros, you will be a Silver
Supporter.
Silver
Supporters will receive a complementary copy
of 911 Conspiracy, US Freedom, and The
Media.
Donations
of 175 euros will qualify you as a Gold
Supporter.
Gold
Supporters will receive the entire set of
six commentary books: 911 Conspiracy, The
Human Condition, The Media, Religion,
US Freedom, and The Work.
Donations of 250 euros will
qualify you as a Platinum Supporter.
Platinum
Supporters will receive the entire set of
six commentary books: 911 Conspiracy, The
Human Condition, The Media, Religion,
US Freedom, and The Work. In addition,
they will receive one other book of their choice free
from our bookstore.
We have more projects like our podcast in
the works - but we need your
help to make them a reality!
Thank
you in advance from the editors and the rest of the team
at Signs of the Times!
In part one of this three part interview, Laura discusses
the reasons why she left the United States, the changing
face of the US and the real reasons behind the so-called
"War on Terror". Laura also discusses
the choices an individual can make to act on the truth
of what is happening in the world.
Below are some of the articles cited so that you
can read the material yourselves.
Next show we'll be continuing the discussion with
Laura as she delves into the
most dangerous idea in the world also known as
Hyperdimensional Realities.
If you have any questions for the Signs Team,
write us at:
[...] Armageddon is
seen by Christian fundamentalists as "nuclear and
imminent", waiting only for proper orchestration
from American political leaders. The Zionists, naturally,
do NOT include Armageddon in their messianic aspirations.
This conflict of interests at a higher level is exposed
in Gorenberg's book.
Gorenberg's book was written before 9-11 and, in this
sense, was extremely prescient. The reader who wishes
to understand what is at the root of the current conflict
that threatens to engulf our planet will find his history
of those 35 disputed acres of the Temple Mount to be crucial.
Gorenberg makes clear what is at the root of the volatile
relationships between Arabs, Jews and Christians in Israel.
He pays special attention to carefully documenting and
analyzing the actions and beliefs of fundamentalist groups
in all three religions.
Jewish messianists and Christian millennialists both
believe that building the Third Temple on the site where
both Solomon's and Herod's temples are alleged to have
stood is essential for their respective prophetic scenarios
to take place (never mind that they seem to both be using
each other and each believe that the other is just a dumb
tool), while the Muslim believers fear that efforts to
destroy Al-Aqsa mosque to make way for the Third Temple
will prevent fulfillment of the prophecy about Islam's
Meccan shrine migrating to Jerusalem at the end of time.
Gorenberg calls Temple Mount "a sacred blasting
cap".
The problem is, of course, as I show in Who Wrote the
Bible, there probably never was a FIRST "Temple of
Solomon," and the Old Testament is NOT a true "history
of the Jews." So, the problem is: if Islam is predicated
on two "manufactured" religions, what does that
say about the faith of the Islamic fundamentalists?
The fact is: There is an alliance between America and
Israel in the war on Islam. They are both determined to
establish Israeli control over Jerusalem and rebuild the
Temple where the Dome of the Rock now stands and the Palestinians
are in the way. [...]
[...] Could it ever
be an evolutionarily stable strategy for people to be
innately unselfish?
On the whole, a capacity to cheat, to compete and to
lie has proven to be a stupendously successful adaptation.
Thus the idea that selection pressure could ever cause
saintliness to spread in a society looks implausible in
practice. It doesn't seem feasible to outcompete genes
which promote competitiveness. "Nice guys" get
eaten or outbred. Happy people who are unaware get eaten
or outbred. Happiness and niceness today is vanishingly
rare, and the misery and suffering of those who are able
to truly feel, who are empathic toward other human beings,
who have a conscience, is all too common. And the psychopathic
manipulations are designed to make psychopaths of us all.
Nevertheless, a predisposition to, conscience, ethics,
can prevail if and when it is also able to implement the
deepest level of altruism: making the object of its empathy
the higher ideal of enhancing free will in the abstract
sense, for the sake of others, including our descendants.
In short, our "self-interest" ought to be vested
in collectively ensuring that all others are happy and
well-disposed too; and in ensuring that children we bring
into the world have the option of being constitutionally
happy and benevolent toward one another.
This means that if psychopathy threatens the well-being
of the group future, then it can be only be dealt with
by refusing to allow the self to be dominated by it on
an individual, personal basis. Preserving free will for
the self in the practical sense, ultimately preserves
free will for others. Protection of our own rights AS
the rights of others, underwrites the free will position
and potential for happiness of all. If mutant psychopaths
pose a potential danger then true empathy, true ethics,
true conscience, dictates using prophylactic therapy against
psychopaths.
And so it is that identifying the psychopath, ceasing
our interaction with them, cutting them off from our society,
making ourselves unavailable to them as "food"
or objects to be conned and used, is the single most effective
strategy that we can play.
It seems certain from the evidence that a positive transformation
of human nature isn't going to come about through a great
spiritual awakening, socio-economic reforms, or a spontaneous
desire among the peoples of the world to be nice to each
other. But it's quite possible that, in the long run,
the psychopathic program of suffering will lose out because
misery is not a stable strategy. In a state of increasing
misery, victims will seek to escape it; and this seeking
will ultimately lead them to inquire into the true state
of their misery, and that may lead to a society of intelligent
people who will have the collective capacity to do so.
[...] Now, let me repeat
the crucial point here: Ideas about conspiracy are not
delusions or paranoia. From a historical point of view,
the ONLY reality is that of conspiracy. Our "freedom"
is to large extent an illusion. Secrecy, wealth and independence
add up to power. ...Deception is the key element of warfare,
(the tool of power elites), and when winning is all that
matters, the conventional morality held by ordinary people
becomes an impediment. In other words, creating religions
to deceive people is standard procedure from the most
primitive "witch doctor" who scares the tribe
so that he can stay in power, right on up to the controls
exerted by George Bush in the name of Christianity, and
undoubtedly beyond, in the realms of hyperdimensions.
[Note: We speak of organized religions here, not about
the very idea of God-Creator and the Mysteries of the
Soul and Mind. If anything, we think that the evidence
shows Creation to be far more grand and glorious than
the organized religions even admit, and that the Cosmos
is not reducible to the simplistic "god theories"
of human beings.]
Secrecy about the true nature of our reality, and the
true foolishness of these religions, stems from a pervasive
and fundamental element of life in our world, that those
who are at the top of the heap will always take whatever
steps are necessary to maintain the status quo.
And maintaining the "status quo" via religion
is one of the main objectives of the Power Elite.
And how do they do that?
By "official culture."
And official religious culture, understood this way,
from the perspective of elite groups wishing to maintain
the status quo of their power, means only one thing: COINTELPRO.
Here we do not mean the specific FBI program, but the
concept of the program, and the likelihood that this has
been the mode of controlling human beings for possibly
millennia.
Remember: those who are at the top of the heap will always
take whatever steps are necessary to maintain the status
quo.
And maintaining the "status quo" via the clever
manipulation of people via religion is one of the main
objectives of the Power Elite.
And so it was that we gradually became aware of the fact
that our approach of evaluating our reality in what amount
to Scientific Gnostic terms, which suggests that this
world we experience, our normally sensed space-time, is
"embedded" in a fifith dimension (and here I
use the term as mathematicians use it, NOT as it is used
by the so-called "New Age") that is REAL, and
our reality may very well be the "battlefield"
of denizens of hyperdimensional space-time, is considered
to be as dangerous as the ideas of the Gnostics and the
Cathars who held similar ideas. That is to say human beings
appear to be the "playing pieces" in vast and
complex Secret Games of the Gods, and our actions or lack
of action may represent the moves and maneuvers of said
denizens of hyperdimensional space who, it seems, most
desperately do NOT want us to unite in our awareness of
their existence, and who exert great effort to confuse
and obfuscate humanity to that end. Because certainly,
if we really discover the proof of their existence, and
their games, we will stop playing.
[...] We learn that
the work on such weapons was begun in Nazi Germany. The
victims of these weapons were largely Jews. When Larson
published his paper in 1970, "the military's private
circles it was old news." Which means it had been
discussed for a long time by the US military, most likely
with the Nazis brought into the US after World War II
via Operation Paperclip. Tests were carried out as far
back as 1951 on Blacks working at the Mechanicsburg, PA
Naval Supply Depot. For more information on tests carried
out by the US government against its own citizens, refer
to our timeline.
An early form of ethnic specific weapon were the malororants,
developed to control crowds (of people dissenting against
the Bush Reich, perhaps?).
Influenza - "a
human respiratory infection of undetermined cause"
according to Webster's dictionary. Most people have at
some stage in their lives felt its effects, and while
the normal human virus is not lethal to humans there exists
the possibility that lethal "mutated" strains
can develop.
Each winter the flu virus makes its expected appearance,
commonly known as the "Flu season". The standard
government response is to commission the large pharmaceutical
companies to manufacture vast amounts of a vaccine.
The vaccine is essentially a dose containing several,
either dead, or alive but weakened, flu virus strains
(among other things as we shall see). When introduced
into the body these supposedly immunise us against those
particular strains. However the vaccine does not cover
all the possible Flu virus strains and if the predominant
flu virus in any given season is not contained in the
vaccine then naturally no protection will be afforded
by the vaccine. Interestingly, this was the case this
2003/4 season, yet it did not stop the government from
urging the public to "get immunised!"
While initially being recommended for the elderly and
young, now it is advised that everyone who wants to avoid
the flu should receive the shot. The question is, how
much do you trust your government, and how much of that
trust is warranted. As we shall see, there is cause to
be highly suspicious of government advice.
Tony Blair is outlining plans to extend powers to deport or exclude foreigners
who encourage terrorism.
The UK can already exclude or deport those who pose a threat to security.
On Thursday al-Qaeda's number two threatened new attacks on London
and blamed the prime minister for the 7 July bombings, which killed
56.
Ayman al-Zawahri also threatened the US were broadcast on an Arabic
news channel. President George Bush said his policy remained the same.
'Indirect incitement'
Mr Blair's news conference on Friday will be his final media grilling
before he departs for his summer holiday.
It will provide a chance for an update on the latest terror situation
and other issues.
London has been nicknamed "Londonistan" - centre for militant
Islam - by some critics who believe the UK has been too liberal towards
radical clerics.
Mr Blair is expected to reveal the precise details of the planned new
powers.
Home Secretary Charles Clarke has already said he wants to extend his
existing powers to cover those who "seek to provoke others to terrorist
acts".
Mr Clarke said he wanted to be able to exclude an individual from the
UK if their presence is deemed "not conducive to the public interest".
There would be consultation before the final list of "unacceptable
behaviours" was decided upon, he said.
Anyone wanting to enter the UK would then be checked against this list
- and if they are on it they may be refused permission to enter the
country.
'Mood shift'
Mr Clarke also said he planned a new offence of "indirect incitement
to terrorism" to add to the current offence of direct incitement.
Metropolitan Police chief Sir Ian Blair argued it would have been better
to bring in the new measures at an earlier date but said he was glad
action was being taken now.
"One of the difficulties has been this idea about
how can we deport people to places where they may suffer oppression,"
he told GMTV.
"Well, I think the public mood is shifting.
I'm sorry, but this is England, Britain, and we don't want this fomenting
of terrorism to go on."[...]
Comment: According to Police
Chief Blair, the effect of the London bombings has been to make the
British people immune to human rights abuses, specifically the deportation
of potentially innocent people to countries where they will probably
be tortured. In a broader sense, it signifies the inoculation of the
British public to the continued crimes of their leaders. Mission accomplished?
On a separate point: we see here that Al-Zawahri has made it explicitly
clear that the the London bombings were carried out in retaliation for
the British participation in the aggressive war against the Iraqi people,
yet Tony Blair has refuted this allegation, saying that the goal of
the terrorists is terrorism for its own sake and the destruction of
"freedom and civilisation". So who are we to believe? Is it
possible that Blair does indeed know the real reasons for the London
bombings and who the real perpetrators are?
If we are to believe Blair, where is the sense in the "terrorists"
making a false claim about the reasons for their attacks? Can anyone
imagine the IRA claiming that their 30 year war was for anything other
than the withdrawal of British interference in Northern Ireland? Any
organised military group that ever waged a campaign against the forces
of a nation state have always had a goal that was understandable and
potentially achievable, at least to a significant portion of the public.
Yet we are now being asked to believe that the "Islamic terrorists"
have no real identifiable or realistically achievable goal, other than
to wipe out freedom and civilisation. Exactly who do they expect to
support them in such a fantastical endeavor? What portion of humanity
would espouse the eradication of basic freedom and civilisation that
every human being benefits from?
These are the proposed points of Government
action listed by Prime Minister Tony Blair during today's news conference:
1. The Government is launching a consultation on new grounds for excluding
and deporting people from the UK.
It is prepared to amend the Human Rights Act in respect
of interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights if legal
obstacles arise.
A list will be drawn up of extremist websites, bookshops and centres,
involvement with which would prompt the Home Secretary to consider the
deportation of any foreign national.
2. There will be new anti-terror legislation in the autumn, including
an offence of condoning or glorifying terrorism which would apply anywhere,
not just in the UK.
3. Anyone participating in terrorism or who has anything to do with
it will automatically be refused asylum.
4. Existing powers to strip people of their British or dual nationality
if they act against the interests of this country, could, after consultation,
be extended to apply to naturalised citizens involved in extremism,
as well as being made made simpler and more effective.
5. The Government will also consult on setting a maximum time limit
for all future extradition cases involving terrorism.
6. Ministers will examine possible ways of extending the period of
time terrorist suspects can be held before they are charged and are
examining a new court procedure which would allow a pre-trial process.
7. For those who are British nationals and cannot be deported, the
use of control orders will be extended with any breach resulting in
imprisonment.
8. Court capacity will be expanded if necessary to deal with "
this and other related issues". The Lord Chancellor will increase
the number of special judges hearing such cases.
9. The radical Hizb ut Tahrir and Al Muhajiroun groups will be banned.
The Government will also look at widening the grounds for banning groups,
putting forward proposals in new legislation.
10. Ministers will "review the threshold" for people who
become British citizens.
Current requirements to "swear allegiance" to the country,
participate in a citizenship ceremony and have an adequate grasp of
the language would be looked at "to see if this is adequate".
A commission would be set up with Muslim leaders to ensure there was
" better integration" with parts of the community which were
" presently inadequately integrated".
11. There will be consultation on a new power to order the closure
of a place of worship used for "fomenting extremism".
Muslim leaders would be asked to help draw up a list of clerics, who
were not British citizens, who were "not suitable to preach",
to be excluded from the country.
12. Proposals to ensure the country's borders are to be brought forward
with a series of countries specifically designated for biometric visas
over the next year.
An international database is being drawn up by the Foreign Office and
Home Office to exclude people "whose activities or views pose a
threat to Britain's security". Any appeal will only be allowed
to take place outside the country.
Mr Blair added that if legislation could be made ready in time and
"the right consensus achieved" the Government was ready to
recall Parliament in September "at least to begin the debate over
the measures".
Comment: Read all of the above
measures and realise that all of this is being implemented in the complete
absence of ANY REAL terrorist threat. Which then begs the question:
Why?
An international organization
representing the heads of police departments across the world has issued
new guidelines recommending that officers who confront a suicide bomber
should shoot the suspect in the head, the Washington Post reported.
The recommendations by the International Association of Chiefs of Police
take a more aggressive posture than typical lethal-force guidelines for
police departments, the newspaper reported on its Web Site late Wednesday.
It said the guidelines were published July 8 - before the London police,
acting on a similar policy, on July 22 fatally shot a Brazilian electrician
in the head because they mistook him for a suicide bomber.
In the United States, the National Bomb Squad Commanders Advisory Board
is developing the first national guidelines for responding to suicide
bombers, the newspaper said.
Police in Israel and Britain, which have a long history
of dealing with terrorist attacks, have adopted a national policy of shooting
a suspected suicide bomber in the head to prevent detonation of a bomb.
The International Association of Chiefs of Police, responding to the
July 7 attacks on three London subways and a double-decker bus that killed
52 people, produced a training guide for dealing with suicide bombers
for its 20,000 members, the newspaper said.
The Post said the guidelines recommend that if an officer needs to use
lethal force to stop someone who fits a certain behavioral profile, the
officer should "aim for the head" to kill the person instantly
and prevent the setting off of a bomb.
The association's behavioral profile says a suicide
bombing suspect might exhibit "multiple anomalies," including
wearing a heavy coat or jacket in warm weather or carrying a briefcase,
duffle bag or backpack with protrusions or visible wires, the newspaper
said.
The profile also said suspects may display such characteristics
as nervousness, an unwillingness to make eye contact, excessive sweating,
or mumbling prayers or "pacing back and forth in front of a venue,"
the newspaper said.
The Post said the police chiefs' guidelines say an officer
does not have to wait until a suspected bomber makes a move in order to
use deadly force, but just needs to have a "reasonable basis"
to believe that the suspect can detonate a bomb.
Comment: So, what
is a "reasonable basis"? A nervous man wearing a heavy coat
on a warm day who is carrying a briefcase or backback and wearing sunglasses.
You have the profile, now load those guns and start shooting!
After decades of Freedom of Information Act requests, Robert B.
Stinnett has gathered the long-hidden evidence that shatters every
shibboleth of Pearl Harbor. It shows that not only was the attack
expected, it was deliberately provoked through an eight-step
program devised by the Navy. Whereas previous investigators have
claimed that our government did not crack Japan's military codes
before December 7, 1941, Stinnett offers cable after cable of
decryptions. He proves that a Japanese spy on the island
transmitted information — including a map of bombing targets
— beginning on August 21, and that government intelligence
knew all about it. He reveals that Admiral Kimmel was prevented
from conducting a routine training exercise at the eleventh hour
that would have uncovered the location of the oncoming Japanese
fleet. And contrary to previous claims, he shows that the Japanese
fleet did not maintain radio silence as it approached Hawaii. Its
many coded cables were intercepted and decoded by American
cryptographers in Stations on Hawaii and in Seattle.
The
evidence is overwhelming. At the highest levels — on FDR's
desk — America had ample warning of the pending attack. At
those same levels, it was understood that the isolationist American
public would not support a declaration of war unless we were
attacked first. The result was a plan to anger Japan, to keep the
loyal officers responsible for Pearl Harbor in the dark, and thus
to drag America into the greatest war of her existence.
Suspicious of FDR’s orders, Admiral Richardson was soon
relieved by Roosevelt
BY
CHARLOTTE THOMPSON ISERBYT
Times Record Contributor
[...] Lie No. 1. FDR and General George Marshall did not have
any advance warning of the Dec. 7 attack on Pearl
Harbor.
[...] Lie No. 2. The United States had not broken the Japanese
naval codes prior to the attack.
[...] Lie No. 3. The Japanese Navy never broke radio silence
from mid-November until Dec. 7 while their aircraft carrier armada
was heading east from Hitokappu Bay across the North Pacific to
Hawaii.
[...] Lie No. 4. Roosevelt and his close aides did not conspire
to goad Japan into a massive first strike against America, thus
forcing the United States to enter the war against the wishes of 88
percent of the American people.
After 16 painstaking years of uncovering documents through the
Freedom of Information Act [FOIA], respected journalist and
historian, Bob Stinnett, now charges that U.S. government leaders
at the highest level not only knew that a Japanese attack was
imminent, but that they had deliberately engaged in policies
intended to provoke the attack, something that many people have
been hesitant to even suggest in the past, and the purpose of this
plan was to draw a reluctant, peace-loving American public into the
war for good or ill (see “New Deal Nemesis: The ‘Old
Right’ Jeffersonians,” The Independent Review, Fall
1996). In fact, public opinion polls in the United States, and Bob
may be able to confirm this for me, have been estimated that at
least 80 percent of the public had been against the
conflict.
Could this be possible, and again, what lessons can we learn?
During World War I, the British journalist, Randolph Bourne coined
the phrase, “War is the health of the state.” The
Oxford University Press book, Crisis and Leviathan, by our senior
fellow, Robert Higgs (editor of The Independent Review) shows that
government power has primarily expanded in American history as a
series of discrete, major leaps. These leaps have occurred largely
at the time of real or imagined war crises as declared by political
leaders. Throughout history, wartime has always been presented by
rulers of any stripe to a public as a time when the normal rules of
civil society are inadequate and must be disbanded, so that
government officials can act without the inconvenient and limiting
restraints of the rule of law. Special government powers are then
marshaled in order to conscript, tax and control the public in
order to deal with the peril, real or imagined.
The
“funny” thing that happens, however, is that after each
crisis has passed, the special war powers accumulated by
governments, seldom, if ever, are reduced, but carry on as if the
conflict was still a reality. The result is a ratchet-type effect
in which real or imagined crises form the justification to continue
to expand statism, essentially sweeping away due process,
constitutional rights, and the rule of law itself.
Government-enforced cartels, corporate welfare, predatory tax
rates, government surveillance, and a similarly unlimited
assortment of regulations, shakedowns and assaults persist to cater
to people who directly benefit from the new powers that government
has been given.
The Free America Project
is a series of planned media releases, first CD's, then
videos and radio show features, centering around the current
Christo-Fascist takeover of the federal government of
the United States of America.
The corporate-owned media have failed this nation. Local
and network TV and radio newscasts, as well as local and
national newspapers, have not only failed to report any
information about this, but have acted as White House
press department, have openly covered up and misconstrued
incriminating stories and facts and even invented disinformation
to keep Ohio and America in the dark. For this reason
we must get the information out there ourselves. We must
"be the media".
Since logic & reason have failed us, we'll try reaching
into America’s conscience through its right brain
to get the message across. “Ohio in the Dark”
is the first CD in the series, centered around the fight
for democracy in Ohio and other states during and in the
months following the election. The next CD in the series
will be "Corporate War", a musical and poetic
look at corporate domination in America. Submit songs
and poetry for "Corporate War" and "Ohio
in the Dark" contact Gary Polvinale at Madog Music.
All CD's in this project will have cumulative releases
as new submissions are added to the existing tracks on
the CD's.
You might find it refreshing to hear music and poetry
that cuts through the White House propaganda dispensed
through the corporate-owned media cartel. Straight talk
never gets old. Woody Guthrie and Pete Seeger changed
the face of America with their music. So can we.
Comment:
Getting the word out on the realities of the Bush gang's
move to tyranny in the US can take many forms. This CD
is a good way to get out the word about the fixed elections
in 2004. With humour and biting wit, these musicians raise
serious issues in an entertaining way. Wise as serpents,
gentle as doves.
You an download the files and the jewel case insert from
the website.