|
"You get America out of Iraq and
Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism."
- Cindy Sheehan
|
P I C T U R E
O F T H E D A Y
©2005 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
Iranian FM says information shows
Britain is seeking to create insecurity in Islamic
republic.
TEHRAN - Iran said Thursday it has proof that Britain
was involved in a double bomb attack last week that
killed six people and injured more than 100 in the
restive southwestern city of Ahvaz.
"Information obtained by the
concerned organs show that Britain is the main accused
in the recent events," Foreign Minister Manouchehr
Mottaki told state television.
"The information
shows that Britain is seeking to create insecurity
in our country by interfering in our internal affairs," he
added, warning that the consequences "could
be worrying for the British."
The British embassy in Tehran immediately denied the
allegations.
"We reiterate our total rejection of these accusations,
as well as our condemnation of these terrorist attacks," a
senior British diplomat said.
"We have made it clear to the Iranian authorities
that the British government and British forces in Iraq
stand ready to assist in preventing attacks of this
kind."
On Saturday, a double bomb attack
killed six people and injured more than 100 in Ahvaz,
the capital of the oil-rich Khuzestan province, and
on Tuesday police said they had defused a large bomb
planted under a bridge in the city.
Several Iranian officials, including President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, have already said that Britain was a suspect
- but had generally stopped short of claiming they
possessed evidence directly implicating Britain.
Ahvaz, dominated by ethnic minority
Arabs, has been hit by a wave of unrest this year,
including riots in April and a series of car bombings
prior to Iran's presidential election in June.
The Iranian allegations come in the wake of similar
allegations made by Britain concerning Iran's alleged
interference in Iraq.
British Prime Minister Tony Blair and other senior
officials have said there is evidence of an Iranian
connection to a series of deadly attacks on British
troops in southern Iraq. [...] |
There is a saying
of sorts that "if you are going to do something,
do it well", and given the serious consequences,
nowhere is that more true than when you plan to engage
in criminal activity. Today in Basra, Southern Iraq,
two members of the British SAS (Special Ops) were caught,
'in flagrante' as it were, dressed in full "Arab
garb", driving a car full of explosives and shooting
and killing two official Iraqi policemen.
This fact, finally reported by the mainstream press,
goes to the very heart of and proves accurate much
of what we have been saying on the Signs of the Times
page for several years.
The following are facts, indisputable by all but the
most self-deluded:
Number 1:
The US and British invasion of Iraq was NOT for the
purpose of bringing
"freedom and democracy" to the Iraqi people,
but rather for the purpose of securing Iraq's oil resources
for the US and British governments and expanding their
control over the greater Middle East.
Number 2:
Both the Bush and Blair governments deliberately fabricated
evidence (lied) about the threat the Saddam posed to
the west and his links to the mythical 'al-Qaeda' in
order to justify their invasion.
Number 3:
Dressed as Arabs, British (and CIA and Israeli) 'special
forces' have been carrying out fake "insurgent" attacks,
including 'car suicide bombings' against Iraqi policemen
and Iraqi civilians (both Sunni and Shia) for the past
two years. Evidence would suggest that these tactics
are designed to provide continued justification for
a US and British military presence in Iraq and to ultimately
embroil the country in a civil war that will lead to
the breakup of Iraq into more manageable statelets,
much to the joy of the Israeli right and their long-held
desire for the establishment of biblical 'greater Israel'
Coming not long after the botched London bombings
carried out by British MI5 where an eyewitness
reported that the floor of one of the trains had
been blown inwards (how can a bomb in a backpack or
on a "suicide bomber" INSIDE the train ever
produce such an effect), more than anything else today's
event in Basra highlights the desperation that is driving
the policy-makers in the British government.
British intelligence would do well to think twice
about carrying out any more 'false flag' operations
until they can achieve the 'professionalism' of the
Israeli Mossad - they always make it look convincing
and rarely suffer the ignominy of being caught in the
act and having the faces of their erstwhile "terrorists" plastered
across the pages of the mainstream media.
|
The
REAL face of "Islamic Terror" - Two
SAS agents caught carrying out a false flag
terror attack in Basra, Iraq September 20th
2005.
|
Official:
British troops freed in jailbreak
CNN
2005/09/20
BAGHDAD, Iraq -- A British armored vehicle escorted
by a tank crashed into a detention center Monday
in Basra and rescued two undercover
troops held by police, an Iraqi Interior Ministry
official told CNN.
British Defense Ministry Secretary John Reid confirmed
two British military personnel were "released," but
he gave no details on how they were freed.
In a statement released in London, Reid did not
say why the two had been taken into custody. But
the Iraqi official, who spoke to CNN on condition
of anonymity, said their arrests stemmed from an
incident earlier in the day.
The official said two unknown
gunmen in full Arabic dress began firing on civilians
in central Basra, wounding several, including a
traffic police officer. There were no fatalities,
the official said.
The two gunmen fled the scene but
were captured and taken in for questioning, admitting
they were British marines carrying out a "special
security task," the official said.
British troops launched the rescue about three hours
after Iraqi authorities informed British commanders
the men were being held at the police department's
major crime unit, the official said.
Iraqi police said members of Iraq's Mehdi Army militia
engaged the British forces around the facility, burning
one personnel carrier and an armored vehicle.
Video showed dozens of Iraqis surrounding British
armored vehicles and tossing gasoline bombs, rocks
and other debris at them.
With one vehicle engulfed in flames,
a soldier opened the hatch and bailed out as rocks
were thrown at him. Another photograph showed a British
soldier on fire on top of a tank.
"Many of those present were clearly prepared
well in advance to cause trouble, and we believe
that the majority of Iraq people would deplore this
violence," Reid said. [...]
Iraqi security officials on
Monday variously accused the two Britons they detained
of shooting at Iraqi forces or trying to plant
explosives. Photographs of the two men in
custody showed them in civilian clothes.
When British officials apparently
sought to secure their release, riots erupted. Iraqi
police cars circulated downtown, calling through
loudspeakers for the public to help stop British
forces from releasing the two. Heavy gunfire broke
out and fighting raged for hours, as crowds swarmed
British forces and set at least one armored vehicle
on fire.
Witnesses said they saw Basra
police exchanging fire with British forces. Sadr's
Mahdi Army militia joined in the fighting late in
the day, witnesses said. A British military spokesman,
Darren Moss, denied that British troops were fighting
Basra police.
Iraqi police detained two British
soldiers in civilian clothes in the southern city
Basra for firing on a police station on Monday,
police said.
"Two persons wearing Arab
uniforms opened fire at a police station in Basra.
A police patrol followed the attackers and captured
them to discover they were two British soldiers," an
Interior Ministry source told Xinhua.
The two
soldiers were using a civilian car packed with
explosives, the source said. He added that
the two were being interrogated in the police headquarters
of Basra.
The British forces informed the
Iraqi authorities that the two soldiers were performing
an official duty, the source said. British military
authorities said they could not confirm the incident
but investigations were underway.
|
Flashback: Who's
Blowing Up Iraq?
New evidence that bombs are being planted by British
Commandos |
By Mike Whitney
09/20/05 |
"The Iraqi security officials on Monday variously
accused two Britons they detained of shooting at
Iraqi forces or TRYING TO PLANT EXPLOSIVES." - Washington
Post, Ellen Knickmeyer, 9-20-05; "British Smash
into Jail to Free Two Detained Soldiers"
In more than two years since
the United States initiated hostilities against
Iraq, there has never
been a positive identification of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
Never.
That doesn't mean that he doesn't exist; it simply
suggests that prudent people will challenge the official
version until his whereabouts and significance in the
conflict can be verified.
At present, much of the rationale for maintaining
the occupation depends on this elusive and, perhaps,
illusory figure. It's odd how Al-Zarqawi appears at
the precise coordinates of America's bombing-raids,
and then, miraculously vanishes unscathed from the
scene of the wreckage. This
would be a remarkable feat for anyone, but especially
for someone who only has one leg.
Al-Zarqawi may simply be a fantasy
dreamed up by Pentagon planners to put a threatening
face on the Iraqi resistance. The Defense
Dept has been aggressive in its effort to shape information
in a way that serves the overall objectives of the
occupation. The primary aim of the Pentagon's "Strategic
Information" program is to distort the truth
in a way that controls the storyline created by the
media. Al-Zarqawi fits perfectly within this paradigm
of intentional deception.
The manipulation of information factors heavily in
the steady increase of Iraqi casualties, too. Although
the military refuses "to do body counts";
many people take considerable interest in the daily
death toll.
Last week, over 200 civilians were killed in seemingly
random acts of violence purportedly caused by al-Zarqawi.
But, were they?
Were these massive attacks the work of al-Zarqawi
as the western media reports or some other "more
shadowy" force?
One member of the Iraqi National Assembly. Fatah al-Sheikh,
stated, "It seems that the American forces are
trying to escalate the situation in order to make the
Iraqi people suffer.. There is a huge campaign for
the agents of the foreign occupation to enter and plant
hatred between the sons of the Iraqi people, and spread
rumors in order to scare the one from the other. The
occupiers are trying to start religious incitement
and if it does not happen, then they will try to start
an internal Shiite incitement."
Al-Sheikh's feelings are shared by a great many Iraqis.
They can see that everything the US has done, from
the of forming a government made up predominantly of
Shi'ites and Kurds, to creating a constitution that
allows the breaking up to the country (federalism),
to using the Peshmerga and Badr militia in their attacks
on Sunni cities, to building an Interior Ministry entirely
comprised of Shi'ites, suggests that the Pentagon's
strategy is to fuel the sectarian divisions that will
lead to civil war. Al-Zarqawi
is an integral facet of this broader plan. Rumsfeld
has cast the Jordanian as the agent-provocateur; the
driving force behind religious partition and antagonism.
But, al-Zarqawi has nothing to gain
by killing innocent civilians, and everything to lose.
If he does actually operate in Iraq, he needs logistical
supporting all his movements; including help with safe-houses,
assistants, and the assurance of invisibility in the
community. ("The ocean in which he swims")
These would disappear instantly if he recklessly killed
and maimed innocent women and children.
Last week the Imam of Baghdad's al-Kazimeya mosque,
Jawad al-Kalesi said, that "al-Zarqawi is dead
but Washington continues to use him as a bogeyman to
justify a prolonged military occupation... He's simply
an invention by the occupiers to divide the people." Al-Kalesi
added that al-Zarqawi was killed in the beginning of
the war in the Kurdish north and that "His family
in Jordan even held a ceremony after his death." (AFP)
Most Iraqis probably agree with al-Kalesi, but that
hasn't deterred the Pentagon from continuing with the
charade. This is understandable given that al-Zarqawi
is the last tattered justification for the initial
invasion. It's doubtful that the Pentagon will ditch
their final threadbare apology for the war. But the
reality is vastly different from the spin coming from
the military. In fact, foreign
fighters play a very small role in Iraq with or without
al-Zarqawi. As the Center for Strategic and International
Studies
(CSIS) revealed this week in their report, "Analysts
and government officials in the US and Iraq overstated
the size of the foreign element in the Iraqi insurgency..
Iraqi fighters made up less than 10% of the armed
groups' ranks, perhaps, even half of that." The
report poignantly notes that most of the foreign
fighters were not previously militants at all, but
were motivated by, "revulsion at the idea of
an Arab land being occupied by a non-Arab country."
The report concludes that the invasion of Iraq has
added thousands of "fresh recruits to Osama bin
Laden's network;" a fact that is no longer in
dispute among those who have studied the data on the
topic.
The al-Zarqawi phantasm is a particularly weak-link
in the Pentagon's muddled narrative. The facts neither
support the allegations of his participation nor prove
that foreigners are a major contributor to the ongoing
violence. Instead, the information
points to a Defense establishment that cannot be trusted
in anything it says and that may be directly involved
in the terrorist-bombings that have killed countless
thousands of Iraqi civilians.
Regrettably, that is prospect
that can't be ignored. After
all, no one else benefits from the slaughter.
(Note: Since this article was written, the Washington
Post has added to our suspicions. In an Ellen Knickmeyer
article "British Smash into Iraqi Jail to free
2 detained Soldiers" 9-20-05, Knickmeyer chronicles
the fighting between British forces and Iraqi police
who were detaining 2 British commandos. "THE IRAQI
SECURITY OFFICIALS ON MONDAY VARIOUSLY ACCUSED THE
TWO BRITONS THEY DETAINED OF SHOOTING AT IRAQI FORCES
or TRYING TO PLANT EXPLOSIVES."
Is this why the British army was ordered to "burst
through the walls of an Iraqi jail Monday in the southern
city of Basra" followed by "British armored
vehicles backed by helicopter gun-ships" ending
in "hours of gun battles and rioting in Basra's
streets"? (Washington Post)
Reuters reported that "half a dozen armored vehicles
had smashed into the jail" and the provincial
governor, Mohammed Walli, told news agencies that the
British assault was "barbaric, savage and irresponsible."
So, why were the British so afraid
to go through the normal channels to get their men
released?
Could it be that the two commandos
were "trying to plant explosives" as the
article suggests?
An interview on Syrian TV last night also alleges
that the British commandos "were planting explosives
in one of the Basra streets".
"Al-Munajjid] In fact, Nidal, this incident
gave answers to questions and suspicions that were
lacking evidence about the participation of the occupation
in some armed operations in Iraq. Many analysts and
observers here had suspicions that the occupation was
involved in some armed operations against civilians
and places of worship and in the killing of scientists.
But those were only suspicions that lacked proof. The
proof came today through the arrest of the two British
soldiers while they were planting explosives in one
of the Basra streets. This proves, according to observers,
that the occupation is not far from many operations
that seek to sow sedition and maintain disorder, as
this would give the occupation the justification to
stay in Iraq for a longer period.
[Zaghbur] Ziyad al-Munajjaid in Baghdad, thank you
very much. Copyright Syrian Arab TV and BBC Monitoring,
2005"
And then there was this on Al-Jazeera TV, Doha, 9-19-05:
Interview with Fattah al-Shaykh, member of the National
Assembly and deputy for Basra.
"The sons of Basra caught two non-Iraqis, who
seem to be Britons and were in a car of the Cressida
type. It was a booby-trapped car laden with ammunition
and was meant to explode in the centre of the city
of Basra in the popular market. However, the sons of
the city of Basra arrested them. They [the two non-Iraqis]
then fired at the people there and killed some of them.
The two arrested persons are now at the Intelligence
Department in Basra, and they were held by the National
Guard force, but the British occupation forces are
still surrounding this department in an attempt to
absolve them of the crime."
Copyright Al Jazeera TV and BBC Monitoring, 2005 (Thanks
to Michel Chossudovsky at Global Research for the quotes
from Al Jazeera and Syrian TV)
Does this solve the al-Zarqawi mystery? Are
the bombs that are killing so many Iraqi civilians
are being planted by British and American Intelligence?
We'll have to see if this damning story can be corroborated
by other sources. |
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the terrorist
leader believed to be responsible for the abduction
of Kenneth Bigley, is 'more myth
than man', according to American military intelligence
agents in Iraq.
Several sources said the importance of Zarqawi,
blamed for many of the most spectacular acts of violence
in Iraq, has been exaggerated
by flawed intelligence and the Bush administration's
desire to find "a villain" for the post-invasion
mayhem.
US military intelligence agents in Iraq have revealed
a series of botched and often tawdry dealings with
unreliable sources who, in the words of one source, "told
us what we wanted to hear".
"We were basically paying up
to $10,000 a time to opportunists, criminals and chancers
who passed off fiction and supposition about Zarqawi
as cast-iron fact, making him out as the linchpin of
just about every attack in Iraq," the agent said.
"Back home this stuff was gratefully
received and formed the basis of policy decisions.
We needed a villain, someone identifiable for the public
to latch on to, and we got one." [...] |
Media mogul Rupert Murdoch is
selling himself as a lunch date for $25,000 on the
internet site eBay to raise
money for a Jerusalem technology college.
The chairman of News Corporation has posted an advert
on the site setting a starting price of $25,000.
The winning bidder will be treated to lunch with four
friends at the company's New York headquarters.
Mr Murdoch has long-established
links with the Israeli hi-tech industry, the
UK's Guardian newspaper reports.
News Corp's satellite TV anti-piracy division NDS
has a large presence in the country, the newspaper
says.
"The winning bidder and
four friends will have the unique opportunity to
dine with their host, Mr Murdoch and know that 100%
of their winning bid will benefit the world class
academic institution, the Jerusalem College of Technology," the
eBay posting said.
The online auction begins on 3 November and will last
for a week.
News Corp owns media companies around the world, including
Fox news and the New York Post newspaper in the US,
and the Sun and the Times newspapers in the UK. |
Many people on the internet are
watching the killings of US military personnel in western
Iraq's border region, and are taking note of how the
killings only benefit the Israeli program to take the
war into Syria. This article is a very good primer
on how this is happening.
However, many naive and well-intentioned folks say
that it is insane to believe that Israel would kill
US military personnel.
After all, these folks believe the Zionist propaganda
about how Israel is a best friend of the United States.
For these people, the best thing
to do is to look back in time and study the historical
record of Israel's attack on the USS Liberty, to realize
that Israel has no qualms about killing US military
personnel.
USS Liberty Massacre
On June 8, 1967, Israel attacked the USS Liberty in
international waters. The Israelis killed 34 sailors
and injured 172 more in a particularly heinous attack
that involved intense aerial strafing, torpedo boats,
and napalm from Israeli jets.
Miraculously, the Israelis did not sink the Liberty,
and the Israeli treachery has been exposed.
Israel's objective with the Liberty attack, had it
went off successfully for Tel Aviv, was to blame the
attack on Egypt, so that the United States would jump
into the Six Day War on the side of the Israelis.
For further study on how the killings of US troops
in western Iraq point to an Israeli intelligence false-flag
provocation program, designed to enrage the United
States to attack Syria, one should study the articles
linked below.
http://judicial-inc.biz/Israel_in_Iraq.htm
http://judicial-inc.biz/Snipers_ambush.htm
http://judicial-inc.biz/Mercs_ambush_marines.htm
http://judicial-inc.biz/Marine_female_ambush_1.htm |
Senior US military officials launched
an investigation today into claims that US soldiers
desecrated the bodies of Taliban fighters in Afghanistan
as part of a propaganda campaign.
Australian investigative news programme
Dateline broadcast a film which appeared to show
US soldiers burning the bodies of two fighters and
using their charred and smoking corpses as a taunt
to nearby Islamic militants.
The programme, which aired last night,
depicted what was described as a US psychological operations
team broadcasting over a loudspeaker toward a village
thought to be harbouring Taliban fighters and sympathisers.
According to a transcript of the program, the soldiers
faced the bodies towards Mecca in a deliberately provocative
move and set them on fire. One said: "Wow,
look at the blood coming out of the mouth on that one,
fucking straight death metal."
A message was then broadcast over a loudspeaker in
the local dialect which, according to the freelance
cameraman, Stephen Dupont, embedded with the 173rd
Airborne Brigade, said: "Attention,
Taliban, you are all cowardly dogs. You allowed your
fighters to be laid down facing west and burned. You
are too scared to come down and retrieve their bodies.
This just proves you are the lady boys we always believed
you to be."
The cremation of bodies is not part of Islamic tradition,
which calls for remains to be washed, prayed over,
wrapped in white cloth and buried within 24 hours.
Mr Dupont said the burnings happened on October 1 outside
the southern village of Gonbaz, near the former Taliban
stronghold of Kandahar.
"This alleged action is repugnant to our common
values," Major General Jason Kamiya said in a
statement from the US base in Bagram, Afghanistan. "This
command takes all allegations of misconduct or inappropriate
behaviour seriously and has directed an investigation
into circumstances surrounding this allegation."
Afghanistan's government demanded that those responsible
be punished and senior Islamic clerics warned that
anti-US demonstrations were likely to break out.
"This is against Islam. Afghans will be shocked
by this news. It is so humiliating," said Faiz
Mohammed, a Muslim leader. "There are very, very
dangerous consequences from this. People will be very
angry."
The US military said its army criminal investigation
division had opened an investigation into alleged misconduct
that included "the burning of dead enemy combatant
bodies under inappropriate circumstances".
General Mohammed Zahir Azimi, a spokesman for the
Afghan defence ministry, said those responsible must
be punished.
The footage did not show the messages being broadcast,
though it did show some military vehicles fitted with
loudspeakers and playing loud music.
Mr Dupont said the soldiers who burned the bodies
said they did so for hygiene reasons. However, Mr Dupont
said the incendiary messages later broadcast by the
US army psychological operations unit indicated they
were aware that the cremation would be perceived as
a desecration.
"They used that as a psychological warfare, I
guess you'd call it. They used the fact that the Taliban
were burned facing west [toward Mecca]," he told
SBS. "They deliberately wanted to incite that
much anger from the Taliban so the Taliban could attack
them ... That's the only way they can find them."
The SBS report suggested the deliberate burning of
bodies could violate the Geneva conventions governing
the treatment of enemy remains in wartime. Under the
conventions, soldiers must ensure that the "dead
are honourably interred, if possible according to the
rites of the religion to which they belonged".
The rules also state that bodies should not be cremated "except
for imperative reasons of hygiene or for motives based
on the religion of the deceased". |
A judge in Spain
has issued an international arrest warrant for three
U.S. soldiers in the shelling of a hotel in Baghdad
that killed a Spanish journalist.
High court Judge Santiago Pedraz issued the warrant
on Wednesday for Sgt. Shawn Gibson, Capt. Philip
Wolford and Lt.-Col. Philip de Camp, then of the
U.S. 3rd Infantry.
Jose Couso, of the Spanish television network Telecinco,
died on April 8, 2003, after a U.S. tank fired on the
Hotel Palestine, where many foreign journalists were
staying during the U.S. invasion of Iraq.
The shelling – which took place
a day before the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime – also
killed a Ukrainian cameraman working for Reuters and
seriously injured three other journalists.
It was captured in TV footage and sparked worldwide
controversy, as some critics – particularly in
the Arab world – accused the United States of
deliberately targeting journalists to try to intimidate
them.
On the same day, U.S. bombs hit the
Baghdad office of the Arab satellite news channel Al-Jazeera,
killing a correspondent.
A U.S. investigation has cleared
the men of any wrongdoing, saying that the soldiers
believed they were returning fire in both incidents.
Journalists at the Palestine Hotel
have said that no one was firing from the building
and the TV footage didn't record any gunfire.
The judge said he issued the warrants because the
United States refused to co-operate with the investigation,
ignoring repeated requests to take statements from
the suspects or let Spanish authorities interview them.
The arrest warrants will be submitted to the international
policing organization Interpol. |
The Guardian's Iraq correspondent,
Rory Carroll, was last night missing after being kidnapped
by gunmen in Baghdad. Carroll, 33, an experienced foreign
correspondent, had been conducting an interview in
the city with a victim of Saddam Hussein's regime.
He had been preparing an article for today's paper
on the opening of the former dictator's trial yesterday.
Carroll, who was accompanied by two drivers and
a translator, was confronted by the gunmen as he
left the house where he had been carrying out the
interview. He and one of the drivers were bundled
into cars. The driver was released about 20 minutes
later.
Carroll has been in Iraq since January. He volunteered
for the assignment and his coverage
has been critical of the US-led coalition. Before
Iraq, he had been the paper's correspondent in Africa,
based in Johannesburg, since 2002. In the previous
three years he had been based in Rome, where he covered
the aftermath of the Kosovo war.
He was born in Dublin, attended university there and
worked for various Irish papers before moving to London.
He has an Irish passport. The Irish government was
last night in contact with its embassies throughout
the Middle East to try to secure help in finding him.
Alan Rusbridger, the Guardian's editor, said: "We're
deeply concerned at Rory's disappearance. He
is in Iraq as a professional journalist - and he's
a very good, straight journalist whose only concern
is to report fairly and truthfully about the country.
We urge those holding him to release him swiftly -
for the sake of his family and for the sake of anyone
who believes the world needs to be kept fully informed
about events in Iraq today." |
Arguments and scuffling as defiant
Saddam appears on mass murder charge
Combative and truculent, Iraq's former dictator,
Saddam Hussein, argued with the judge and scuffled
with security guards yesterday, when he went on trial
for mass murder in a Baghdad courtroom that was as
much a theatre as a forum for justice. Beamed across
the Middle East on television, the trial marked the
first criminal proceedings against an Arab leader
in modern times.
Echoing the defiance he showed when first charged
last year, Saddam refused to give his name when asked
to confirm his identity. "I am the president of
Iraq," he said. "You know me," he told
Judge Rizgar Mohammed Amin, a Kurd. When the session
opened, he stood and asked Amin: "Who are you?
I want to know who you are."
Denouncing the American invasion and making it clear
he was appealing to a world audience, he said: "I
do not respond to this so-called court, with all due
respect to its people, and I retain my constitutional
right as the president of Iraq." Brushing off
the judge's attempts to interrupt him, he declared: "Neither
do I recognise the body that has designated and authorised
you, nor the aggression, because all that has been
built on a false basis." Later he objected to
being referred to as "former" president.
Five black-robed judges sat in the specially-built
courtroom in the marble building that once served as
the National Command Headquarters of the Ba'ath party
in what is now the fortified Green Zone. Only the presiding
judge's face was seen on TV. His name had come out
in the media earlier.
The broadcast was subject to
a deliberate 30-minute delay to allow for control
over what went out and give the authorities the chance
to censor Saddam's comments. After the three-hour
hearing, the judge adjourned the trial until November
28, saying that around 30 or 40 witnesses had not
come to Baghdad for the trial. "They were too
scared to be public witnesses. We're going to work
on this issue for the next sessions," he told
Reuters. At the start of the hearing the judge called
the accused - Saddam and his seven co-defendants
- into the courtroom one by one. The ex-president
was the last to enter, looking gaunt. He motioned
to the escorts to slow down a little. After sitting,
he greeted his co-defendants.
The judge read the defendants their rights before
listing the charges, and told them that they face possible
execution if convicted. The charges
relate to the killings and executions of more than
140 Shia men from the village of Dujail, put to death
after a failed assassination attempt on Saddam in 1982.
The case was chosen on the grounds that it should be
easier to prove he ordered it than better-known atrocities
such as the gassing of thousands of Kurds in Halabja
in 1988. |
BEIJING (AP) - In
a rare face-to-face encounter with an American defense
secretary, a small group of Chinese officers held
a spirited and sometimes pointed debate Thursday
with Donald H. Rumsfeld over the two countries' clashing
views about the size and meaning of China's military
buildup.
Stressing a theme that he repeated throughout his
three-day visit to Beijing, Rumsfeld told students
and faculty at the Academy of Military Science that
the United States and other countries are concerned
not so much that China is expanding its military
but that it has been vague about why.
``China of course is expanding
its missile forces and enabling those forces to reach
many areas of the world well beyond the Pacific region,'' Rumsfeld
said in opening remarks before engaging in a give-and-take
session with several officers, including the head
of the military academy.
``Those advances in China's
strategic strike capability raise questions, particularly
when there's an imperfect understanding of such developments
on the part of others,'' Rumsfeld added. A
day earlier he visited the headquarters of China's
strategic missile forces - the first by a foreigner.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Kong Quan said
later, ``We have said on many occasions that China's
move to step up its defense capability is quite legitimate
and reasonable.''
Kong also said the two countries had ``agreed to step
up military exchanges and relations, especially on
military institution education and visits of warships.''
Later Thursday, Rumsfeld flew to Seoul, South Korea,
where he was attending an annual meeting of U.S. and
South Korean defense officials Friday to review their
alliance and its recent turbulence.
The Pentagon has begun pulling thousands of U.S. troops
out of South Korea, where it has maintained a contingent
of about 37,000 troops for decades - a legacy of the
Cold War amid concern that communist North Korea might
attempt to reunite the two Koreas by launching an all-out
attack.
Gen. Leon J. LaPorte, commander of U.S. forces in
Korea, told reporters Thursday evening that by the
end of this year 8,000 of the 12,500 troops designated
for withdrawal will have left South Korea.
A brigade of the 2nd Infantry Division, which is the
main U.S. Army combat force in Korea, has already moved
to Fort Carson, Colo., after serving a yearlong tour
in Iraq. LaPorte said there is no current intention
to reduce the American force beyond the 12,500 already
designated to go.
In an interview with American reporters traveling
with Rumsfeld, LaPorte said the South Korean government
wants to review the command arrangement for the combined
U.S.-South Korean military force that is under South
Korean control during peacetime but would switch to
U.S. control if war broke out.
``It is natural for a country, as it develops capabilities,
to want to become more predominant in their own national
security,'' LaPorte said. ``So this is a natural evolution.
We have supported the Republic of Korea for 50 years.
They have the 12th largest economy in the world. So
it's natural for them to say, `Listen, we appreciate
the support we received; we are now capable of doing
more things and taking a more predominant role.'''
In Beijing, Rumsfeld made a point on several occasions
of saying that China appears to be understating the
size of its defense budget, and that this has created
suspicions about its intentions.
During his give-and-take at the Academy
of Military Science, a Chinese officer challenged him
on this point, saying the defense budget had been rising
in part to make up for insufficient defense investments
in the past. The exchange was recounted for reporters
later by Lawrence Di Rita, Rumsfeld's spokesman, who
was present. Reporters were required to leave the room
shortly after the question-and-answer session began.
The Chinese officer asked Rumsfeld why he was bothered
by the budget increases, and Rumsfeld said he was not
worried, although he went on to complain that China
had been sending mixed signals about its interest in
improving relations with the United States, according
to Di Rita's account.
Rumsfeld accused China of teaming up with Russia to
pressure Uzbekistan into telling U.S. forces to leave
Uzbekistan last summer and of excluding the U.S. military
from a search-and-rescue exercise in Hong Kong.
Another Chinese officer challenged Rumsfeld on the
Uzbekistan matter, saying the Pentagon was at fault
for being insufficiently open about what its forces
were doing in Uzbekistan and how long they intended
to stay, according to Di Rita. Rumsfeld denied that
U.S. purposes there were unclear. |
KIEV, Oct. 19 (Xinhuanet) --
Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko said Wednesday
that gaining full membership in NATO accords with his
country's national interests and is an unswerving strategic
goal.
During a meeting between top Ukrainian and NATO
sec
urity officials, Yushchenko said NATO membership
would give his country substantial benefits, according
to the Ukrainian National Information Agency.
Yushchenko said Ukraine hopes to fully join NATO and
the European Union, which he claimed will guarantee
Europe's safety and stability.
Ukraine, a former Soviet republic, has been seeking
entry into the military alliance over the past years.
In 2002, the then President Leonid Kuchma first announced
the country's wish to join NATO. Yushchenko reiterated
the goal after taking office as president in early
2005.
NATO membership "is a powerful incentive for
the transformation of society, aimed at deepening democracy,
strengthening human rights and freedoms," Yushchenko
said at Wednesday's meeting, which was also participated
by NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer.
The alliance has repeatedly said Ukraine must first
reduce and modernize its bloated military, prove its
democratic credentials and fight corruption.
De Hoop Scheffer said NATO is ready to assist Ukraine "wherever
and whenever necessary" to implement the reforms."
"Reforms are essential, and they have to be done," he
said, adding that NATO's door will always be open to
Ukraine.
The NATO chief also said next year's parliamentary
vote in Ukraine, if free and fair, "would be considered
a milestone."
Some analysts predict that Ukraine could receive an
invitation to join the alliance during NATO's 2008
summit. |
Oct. 20 (Bloomberg) -- A
Virginia company admitted in state Supreme Court
in New York that it paid $440,000 in kickbacks to
Iraqi officials as part of the United Nations ``oil-for-food''
program.
Midway Trading, based in Reston, Virginia, pleaded
guilty to grand larceny charges and agreed to pay
a $250,000 fine, Manhattan District Attorney Robert
Morgenthau said today.
``The oil-for-food program was set up as a way for
the Iraqi people to receive humanitarian goods and
not to line the pockets of the ruling party,'' Morgenthau
said.
Created by the U.N. Security Council as an exemption
to sanctions imposed on Iraq after its 1990 invasion
of Kuwait, the program allowed Iraq's former dictator,
Saddam Hussein, to sell $64 billion worth of oil from
1996 until the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. Hussein skimmed
more than $17 billion from the program through oil
smuggling and graft involving humanitarian goods, U.S.
congressional investigators said in November.
Morgenthau said Midway won the right in late 2000
to buy $42 million worth of oil from Iraq through Bulf
Oil, a Romanian company, as part of the oil-for-food
program. He said Midway funneled the bribes to Iraqi
government officials through a Bulf employee.
Prosecutors did not identify the Bulf employee who
sent the Midway bribes to Iraq or say which Iraqi officials
received the money.
`Saddam's Family'
``It's a reasonable assumption that it went to members
of Saddam's family,'' said Assistant District Attorney
Dan Castleman, who heads the investigations unit.
Former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker,
who headed an inquiry into the oil-for-food program,
told the U.N. Security Council in September that the
international body ``has been weakened'' by mismanagement
and corruption of the program.
Morgenthau said today that there was no evidence
of corruption on the part of U.N. officials relating
to the Midway transaction. Midway falsely represented
to U.N. officials that no bribes had been paid, he
said. |
Corrente was right on the money.
Yesterday’s conspiracy theory is today’s
news. Read on:
We
wrote then:
7. I suggest that Times management—Keller,
Sulzberger—was embedded in the disinformation
campaign run by the White House Iraq Group, that
Miller was their operative, and Libby was their
handler. Of course, their White House handler wouldn’t
have been crass enough to offer them money; the
access to power, and the promise of scoops, would
have been enough. The scoops were to come from
Chalabi. (It doesn’t matter whether the White
House still had faith in Chalabi; what matters
is that the Times did).
The Daily
News reports today (here via
The Amazin’ Froomkin:
WASHINGTON - It was called the White House Iraq
Group and its job was to make the case that Saddam
Hussein had nuclear and biochemical weapons.
Besides Rove and Libby, the group included senior
White House aides Karen Hughes, Mary Matalin, James
Wilkinson, Nicholas Calio, Condoleezza Rice and Stephen
Hadley. WHIG also was doing more than just public
relations, said a second former intel officer.
“They were funneling information to [New York
Times reporter] Judy Miller. Judy was a charter member”,
the source said.
So, among the 50
stories that WHIG planted in the runup to the
war, some were from Judy “Kneepads” Miller.
One dot connected.
Our remaining dots at the Times are Keller and Sulzberger.
And doesn’t this story put all Judy’s claims
that “I can do whatever I want,” and “running
amok,” and being in the “driver’s
seat” in a new light, doesn’t it?
Surely it’s obvious that when she says that,
she’s protecting Keller and Sulzberger? As well
as her ability to “eat lunch in this town” and
travel to conferences and pontificate on freedom of
the press?
The Plame story is a sideshow; it’s
the tape on the Watergate doors.
The real story is the WHIG: A massive domestic covert
operation, a disinformation campaign run directl from
the White House, to “fix the facts and the intelligence
around the policy” by planting stories in the
press to lead the country into war. |
Bill Bennett and Bob Bennett are
brothers.
Bill Bennett is the social conservative pundit.
Bob Bennett is the white-collar criminal defense lawyer.
Bob Bennett is the lawyer for New York Times' reporter
Judith Miller.
As you might recall -- and how could you forget? --
Bill Bennett took to the airwaves a couple of weeks
ago espoused that "you could abort every black
baby in this country, and your crime rate would go
down." He then quickly added, "That would
be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible
thing to do, but your crime rate would go down."
Of course, Bill Bennett was talking about street crime.
If he were to address the issue of
white collar and corporate crime -- the kind that his
brother Bob defends every day for a very nice living
-- then he might have said something like -- "you
could abort every white male destined to go to Harvard
Business School, and your crime rate would go down."
Now that would be impolite.
But the reality is that crimes committed
by the powerful -- both in government and in corporations
-- inflicts far more damage on society than all crime
committed by the powerless.
Let's take the crimes of Harvard Business School graduate
George Bush.
The President's cronies are being investigated for
leaking classified information to various reporters,
including to Judith Miller.
(By the way, we agree with Patrick Buchanan who was
on MSNBC's Hardball Show last night and observed that
Bush and Cheney's real success in the whole Judith
Miller/Valerie Plame episode was turning "the
New York Times, the newspaper of record in this country,
into a propaganda organ for the war party.")
Why not an investigation for war crimes?
In the words of former Supreme Court
Justice and Nuremberg prosecutor Robert Jackson --
whom newly confirmed Chief Justice John Roberts says
he "admires" -- the supreme international
crime is the war of aggression.
And guess who are the architects of
the most recent war of aggression?
George Bush and Dick Cheney and their associates.
With an assist from Congress -- including Presidential
hopefuls John Kerry and Hillary Clinton -- which for
voted to authorize the war.
Do you see any of the architects of the illegal war
in Iraq on trial for mass murder?
Why not?
If putting Saddam on trial for mass
killing is a good thing, then putting the architects
of the most recent war of aggression is a good thing
too.
(And by mass killing we mean approaching 2,000 young
Americans and tens of thousands of Iraqis in an unjustifiable
war of aggression.)
Despite the wave of crime by the powerful that has
swept over the country in recent years -- and inflicted
far more damage on society that all street crime combined
-- when people with the institutional megaphones like
Bill Bennett use the word "crime," they mean
street crime.
(When Bob Bennett talks about crime, he invariably
means white-collar and corporate crime -- but that's
because his clients are paying him big bucks to clear
their names.)
As a result, this bias has been hard wired into our
brains.
Here's a quick test.
We will write down a word.
And you tell us the first image that comes to your
mind.
Ready?
Looter.
Okay, and the first image to come to your mind?
Do you conjure up a black kid in New Orleans wading
through the waters with DVDs stuffed in his pockets?
Why not Conrad Black, also known as Lord Black of
Crossharbour?
Lord Black is under investigation along with his associates
-- by the same Patrick Fitzgerald who is investigating
the Bush leak affair -- of looting $400 million from
Hollinger International, the esteemed publisher of
the Chicago Sun-Times and the Jerusalem Post, among
myriad other publications.
A special 513-report on the looting at Hollinger,
issued by Richard Breeden, former chair of the Securities
and Exchange Commission, called Black's management
team at Hollinger a corporate kleptocracy.
That would be a bureaucracy of kleptomaniacs. (Credit
for the looter imagery goes to Joe Loughran, a Republican
white-collar crime pundit we interviewed recently.)
So the image of a looter is that of
the black kid with some DVDs stuffed into his coat
pocket.
And not of Lord Black of Crossharbour?
And the image of the war criminal
is that of Saddam Hussein.
And not George Bush?
And Bill Bennett says that if we aborted all of the
black kids, the crime rate would go down?
Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington,
D.C.-based Corporate Crime Reporter, <http://www.corporatecrimereporter.com>.
Robert Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based
Multinational Monitor, http://www.multinationalmonitor.org,
and on the steering committee of the Center for Corporate
Policy. Mokhiber and Weissman are co-authors of On
the Rampage: Corporate Predators and the Destruction
of Democracy (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press).
(c) Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman |
WASHINGTON, Oct. 19 (UPI) -- Secretary
of State Condoleezza Rice faced a skeptical and at
times combative Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Wednesday in her first hearing on Iraq before the panel
since she assumed office.
Rice's problem is an ironic one: the reality in Iraq
is finally catching up to Bush administration rhetoric,
but the White House's ability to tell the story is
hamstrung by its compromised credibility on the war.
Senator after senator - Republican and Democrat -
counseled Rice to speak plainly about Iraq to the public,
more often, to shore up faltering support for the war.
A new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll indicates 51
percent of the people don't think removing Saddam Hussein
from power was worth the cost in U.S. lives and treasure;
58 percent want to reduce the number of American troops;
and 56 percent are now less confident of a successful
conclusion to that war. A recent Pew poll shows 41
percent of the people think the war in Iraq has increased
the chance of a terrorist attack on the United States.
Only 25 percent think it has diminished the chance.
"The gap between the rhetoric of the administration
and the reality the Americans see on the ground has
created a credibility chasm," said Sen. Joseph
Biden, D-Del. [...]
Rice Wednesday tacitly acknowledged the fact that
there have not been enough U.S. troops for the "holding" mission
by heralding the achievements of Iraqi forces who now
do that job. [...]
Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., traced the public's "walk
away from the administration" to what she considers
repeated inaccuracies about issues surrounding the
war - the claim that Iraq had chemical, biological
and nuclear weapons; that the war would be completed
in six months; that the U.S. military would be greeted
as liberators; that the rebuilding would be an "affordable
endeavor"; that the U.S. share of rebuilding would
be limited to just a couple of billion dollars; and
most recently that the insurgency is in its "last
throes."
"The administration created false expectations
not just for the American people, but also for the
Iraqi people," Boxer said. "Madame Secretary,
our country is sick at heart of the spin and the false
expectations."
Boxer charged that Rice, last weekend, added a new
layer of subterfuge to the debate over Iraq when she
said on NBC's Meet the Press that the reason the United
States invaded Iraq was because of the attack on September
11. Rice said rather than just going after the Afghanistan-based
al Qaida, the Bush administration decided to go against
the root cause of extremism, which meant building a
democratic Middle East.
"Let me tell you, if the people of the United
States of America knew at the time that our mission
was to rebuild the entire Middle East, which you have
several times called a malignancy ... if that was what
the war was about -- the first war and even the second
war -- they would have walked away from this administration
long before they've walked away. And they are gone," Boxer
said.
Rice clung to the administration's refusal to specify
a timetable for the withdrawal of troops from Iraq.
By her reasoning, saying when U.S. troops would pull
out would only encourage the insurgents to keep fighting
until that date. To win they don't need to beat the
United States, just outlast it.
However, senators from both sides of the aisle sought
potential withdrawal dates that reflect projected success
in establishing a functioning Iraqi government and
security force. They argue that
by refusing to discuss rough timetables, it leaves
the impression the United States intends to remain
in Iraq as a foothold in the Middle East - something
that fuels the Iraqi insurgency and probably influences
foreigners to join or support al Qaida as well.
"That's what undercuts our credibility," said
Sen. Russell Feingold, D-WI. "People
naturally are a little bit suspicious of a country
that invades another country... They wonder
if we're not there for some other reason. And you've
heard the reasons -- oil, or domination of the Middle
East."
Rice rejected that rationale.
"I simply don't agree our
its our presence feeding the insurgency," she
said, contradicting a statement to the contrary by
the top U.S. general in Iraq last month. "We've
been very clear that we don't want to stay. That's
a different matter than giving a timetable for when
we think we will leave."
"I have no doubt it's
going to be on a reasonable time frame," she
said [...] |
WASHINGTON - Secretary
of State Condoleezza Rice declined on Wednesday to
rule out American forces still being needed in Iraq
a decade from now. Senators warned that the
Bush administration must play it straight with the
public or risk losing public support for the war.
Pushed by senators from both parties to define the
limits of U.S. involvement in Iraq and the Middle
East, Rice also declined to rule out the use of military
force in Iran or Syria, although she said the administration
prefers diplomacy.
"I don't think the president ever takes any of
his options off the table concerning anything to do
with military force," Rice said. [...]
"One thing the Vietnam
generation learned is no foreign policy can be sustained
without the informed consent of the American people.
And we haven't gotten that informed consent in terms
of them knowing what they're signing on to from here
on out," Sen. Joseph P. Biden Jr., D-Del.,
told Rice. [...] |
President Bush vowed Thursday
to avoid the "background noise" of investigations
and political problems to focus on the nation's needs.
"The American people expect me to do my job,
and I'm going to," he said.
With his political stock falling and several allies
under investigation, Bush tried to keep focus on the
nation's business at a Rose Garden news conference
with Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas.[...]
Even with a foreign leader at his side, it was hard
for Bush to ignore the contretemps of Washington. He
was asked about his political problems in general,
and one in particular: the troubled nomination of Harriet
Miers to be a Supreme Court justice.[...]
A federal prosecutor is wrapping up his investigation
into the leak of a CIA agent's identity, putting the
White House on edge as the fate of two senior advisers
hang in the balance. Bush's long-serving political
confidant, Karl Rove, and a top aide to Vice President
Dick Cheney, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, are
key figures in the inquiry.
Former House Leader Tom DeLay
faces conspiracy and money-laundering charges in
Texas. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist's
stock transactions are being scrutinized by federal
prosecutors and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Bush's political woes came into focus with a natural
disaster: the sluggish response of state, local and
federal governments to Hurricane Katrina dented his
aura of sure-footed leadership. He has sought to recover
politically by promising a massive relief effort on
the Gulf Coast.
Asked how he is dealing with such a full plate, Bush
said: "There is some background noise here, a
lot of chatter, a lot of speculation and opining, but
the American people expect me to do my job and I'm
going to."
He also said, "part of my job is to work with
others to fashion a world that will be peaceful for
future generations. I've got a job to do to make sure
the economy continues to grow. I've got a job to make
sure there is a plausible reconstruction plan for cities
affected by Katrina."
Polls show six in 10 Americans disapprove
of Bush's job performance and even more believe the
country is headed on the wrong course. Support for
the president's handling of the Iraq was has also plummeted
as the mood of the nation has soured. |
WASHINGTON, Oct. 20 (Xinhuanet)
-- US President George W. Bush, ata joint press conference
with visiting Palestinian leader Mahmud Abbas on Thursday,
said that in the coming days he will name a newsecurity
coordinator to replace outgoing General Kip Ward.
"In the coming days, I will be naming our new
coordinator to build on the progress General Ward
has made," Bush said.
"This person will take on an enhanced mission
to help President Abbas and the Palestinian authority
carry out their responsibilityto end terror attacks,
dismantle terrorist infrastructure, maintain law and
order and one day provide security for their own state," Bush
added. |
HANOI, Oct. 20 (Xinhuanet) --
The floodwater caused by rainstorms hit Vietnam's southern
Mekong Delta city of Can Tho, Vietnam News Agency reported
Thursday.
Water tides in the Hau River, which hit a peak of
2.2 meters or 0.5 meters above the third and highest
warning level on Wednesday, have broken four sections
of dykes and submerged most of the transport system
in the city. In Some areas water is 0.5 meters above
the surface, said the report.
The flood has caused many traffic accidents and brought
about health problems to hundreds of families. |
The song met the town. Last Sunday
night James McMurtry performed "We Can't Make
It Here" (see counterpunch.org
9/30/05 for all the lyrics) at the Canal Street
Tavern in Dayton, Ohio. Dayton gets mentioned in the
song as the hollowed-out shell of manufacturing that
it is.
The crowd of 100 punctuated "We Can't
Make It Here" with hoots, hollers, claps, "yeah's" and "right
on's." The man was testifyin'. The song, which
came midway through the show, received the longest
ovation I've ever seen for a song that wasn't a regular-show
closer or an encore.
Dayton's 5,700 Delphi automotive
workers will lose their jobs unless they agree to
have their wages slashed by 60-70%. Had a
Delphi executive been in the bar that night he would
have been ripped to pieces and thrown out on the
street without a twinge of remorse. The crowd's joy
of hearing the truth, mixed with anger at capitalist
reality, was palpable all through "We Can't
Make It Here." Think anybody's going to clap
for the lies, irrelevancies and misdirections of
CNN, Fox News or the New York Times?
Stephen King has called "We Can't Make It Here" the
best protest song since Dylan's "Masters
of War." I think of it as a companion piece to
Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five's "The
Message." A crack world book-ended with
a crank world. Not much has changed -- don't push us
because we are close to the edge and we can't make
it here anymore. God, how I wish we'd get pushed over
that edge.
The day before McMurtry played, the Dayton Daily News
told us:
1) Ohio leads the nation in bankruptcy
filings
2) Ohio leads the nation in mortgage
failures and home foreclosures with Montgomery County
(Dayton) tops in the state
3) the Dayton Metro area is second
only to the Detroit Metro area for employment declines
in the past year
One day the American working class is going to exercise,
in Henry Miller's words, our "legitimate bloodlust." One
day workers won't be freezing their asses off in a
picket line outside of a factory; they' ll be occupying
the factories and they'll have their spouses and lovers
and brothers and sisters and mothers and fathers and
children and guns and dogs with them. And they'll be
daring the cops to take them on. And the cops will
back down. And if it happens at just one plant it will
spread like wildfire all over the country and the working
class will announce that things are going to be different
from this moment on. The world can't get well until
the American working class gets well; the whole world
waits for us to ignite a revolution and dispossess
the capitalist class.
The day after McMurtry played, the
DDN reported on the last minute record-setting crush
of bankruptcy filings. Clerk of Courts Michael Webb
for the U.S. Bankruptcy Court covering Dayton, Cincinnati
and Columbus said his staff was "excited about
it. They think it's a part of history."
That's the only kind of history that capitalist America
is capable of making. One day the 50 millionth American
will have no health insurance. One day soon the 2,000th
American soldier will be killed in Iraq. One day $1
trillion of our taxes will have been spent on the Iraq
crime. And more and more of us "can't make it
here anymore." Thanks, James McMurtry, for
giving this country its true national anthem.
After reading the bankruptcy article I was out the
door to my no-benefit driving job where the cost of
fuel is killing us worse than the wage cuts we've also
eaten in the past year and where most drivers can't
afford health insurance and most have either been through
bankruptcy or should go through it but are too proud
to file but who all happen to be the hardest working,
hustling people I've ever worked with in my life...
It's time for me to drive up and down I-75 and move
your shit, capitalist tapeworms. One day, we won't
be moving; you will. You'll be shagging your asses
to Saudi Arabia or Kuwait, one step/jet ahead of a
bullet, a blade or bare hands.
Randy Shields lives in Vandalia, Ohio.
He can be reached at: randy451@earthlink.net
|
PARIS, Oct 19 (AFP) - Presidents
Hugo Chavez of Venezuela and Jacques Chirac of France
met in Paris on Wednesday and agreed to further develop
their already close ties.
The meeting, which officials of
both countries hailed, was expected to raise hackles
in Washington, which is particularly at odds with
the leader of oil-rich Venezuela.
During their hour-long meeting "the two presidents
examined bilateral economic relations and in particular
looked at issues concerning, oil, energy, infrastructure
and tourism," Chirac's spokesman Jerome Bonnafont
said.
"They decided to set up an organised mechanism
for dialogue to further develop economic and industrial
cooperation between the two countries," he added.
It was the third time the two had met this year.
French oil giant Total has a strong presence in Venezuela
and could double its output from 200,000 to 400,000
barrels a day after several billion dollars were invested,
Chavez said in Paris in March.
Venezuela currently produces 3.1 million barrels of
oil a day. It is the world's fifth largest exporter
and the only country in Latin America to be a member
of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries
cartel.
Half of its production goes to the US, providing 15
percent of that country's consumption.
Relations between Caracas and Washington, however,
are strained, not least by Chavez's close ties to Cuban
President Fidel Castro.
Chavez, while standing accused of having a destabilising
influence on his neighbours, has often accused the
US government of plotting his overthrow. He recently
called the US a "terrorist" state.
Although Franco-US relations have calmed somewhat
since the row over the Iraq war, Paris and Washington
still have their differences.
This week brought disagreement over World Trade Organisation
negotiations on agriculture subsidies and over a proposed
UNESCO convention on "protecting cultural diversity" that
Washington opposes in the belief that France and other
countries will use it to justify barriers to Hollywood
film exports.
The Venezuelan leader came to France with a 40-strong
delegation of industrialists and on Thursday a meeting
with French business leaders is planned.
Trade between the two countries in the first half
of this year stood at 235 million euros (280 million
dollars) with the balance tilted in favour of Venezuela,
thanks to its exports of oil and derivative products
to France.
During the mini summit Chirac reiterated that France
and the European Union supported regional integration
in Latin America as a "boon for stability and
economic and social progress," according to Bonnafont,
who said the French president noted Venezuela's recent
accession to MERCOSUR, the common market of Argentina,
Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay.
Earlier Wednesday, Chavez lunched
with French Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin, who
spoke of the "common vision between the two countries."
Villepin added, in an impeccable Spanish
he learnt growing up in Caracas, that "relations
between France and Venezuela are very good and we are
looking to develop our cooperation on all levels."
"I think the next few months
and years are going to prove very important in the
cooperation between our two countries," he added.
Chavez met Chirac in March in Paris, and then again
in August on the French island of Martinique, where
the two paid their respects to 152 French passengers
who died aboard a chartered plane that crashed in Venezuela.
"This third meeting of the year shows the close,
human and personal relationship that unites the two
leaders," the Venezuelan ambassador to Paris,
Roy Chaderton Matos, told AFP. |
BALAKOT, Pakistan -- Pakistan's
death toll soared to 79,000 yesterday from South
Asia's earthquake after a survey of one of the two
hardest-hit Pakistani regions -- making it one of
the deadliest quakes in modern times.
More aftershocks rattled the region, sending up
huge clouds of dust from steep-sided mountain valleys
where villages lie in pieces. During a helicopter
tour of the ruins, the president, General Pervez
Musharraf, promised new, quake-ready houses for the
homeless.
In remote mountains, a steady flow of injured villagers
continued to seek medical attention. Many had infected
wounds, untreated since the Oct. 8 temblor, and had
to rely on relatives to carry them for hours on foot
to makeshift clinics.
Sixty helicopters were dropping relief supplies, and
mule trains were pushing into areas where no helicopters
can land.
''Many people out there, we are not going to get to
in time," said Rob Holden, the UN disaster coordinator
in Pakistan's part of Kashmir. ''Some people who have
injuries don't have a chance of survival." |
TOKYO (AP) - A strong earthquake
rocked northeastern Japan late Wednesday, shaking buildings
in Tokyo and nearby areas and briefly shutting down
train lines. Two people were reportedly injured.
The earthquake, with a preliminary magnitude of
6.5, was centered 30 miles below the sea off the
coast of Ibaraki prefecture, about 70 miles northeast
of Tokyo, the U.S. Geological Survey said. There
was no danger of a tsunami, officials said.
The quake shook 20 of the country's 47 prefectures,
said Takeshi Hachimine, a spokesman for Japan's Meteorogical
Agency. He said the region should brace for aftershocks
measuring at least magnitude 5.0 over the next few
days.
A woman in Ibaraki cut her nose after falling out
of her bed, while another slightly injured her hip
near Tokyo, according to the Kyodo News agency. Police
spokesman Meihan Toyoshima said no serious injuries
had been reported.
A nuclear power plant in Tokaimura near the quake
zone shut down automatically, but there appeared to
be no damage, Toyoshima said. Tokyo Electric Power
Co. spokesman Kiyoto Ishikawa said electricity to about
600 homes in Ibaraki was cut off following the quake,
but restored in less than a minute.
Officials at Tokyo's Narita international airport
said its runways were shut down after the quake but
reopened in about 10 minutes.
High-speed train services north of Tokyo were suspended
but quickly resumed, according to the company's information
hot line.
It was the second jolt in the area in recent days.
A 5.1 quake outside Tokyo on Sunday shook the capital
region and injured two people.
Japan, one of the world's most earthquake-prone countries,
sits atop four tectonic plates. The last major earthquake
to hit Tokyo killed some 142,000 people in 1923. |
SAN DIEGO -- A light earthquake
struck Wednesday in the ocean 19 miles southeast of
San Clemente Island, the Caltech Seismological Laboratory
reported. The quake struck at 1:51 a.m. with a preliminary
magnitude of 4.1, said Pasadena-based Caltech seismologist
Nick Scheckel, adding it was an aftershock of the magnitude
4.9 temblor recorded in the same area at 2:11 p.m.
Sunday.
Officials in public safety agencies in more than
a half-dozen coastal cities in Los Angeles, Orange
and San Diego counties said they had received no
reports of injuries or damages in the aftermath of
the quake, and National Weather Service meteorologists
said it generated no unusual wave activity.
Caltech placed the epicenter at 48 miles west of Mission
Beach and 49 miles south-southeast of Avalon, where
a Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department employee
said she felt only very slight shaking. The quake apparently
was not linked to the light shakers that struck near
Cabazon, north of Palm Springs, Monday night and early
Tuesday, Caltech reported. |
Pakistan's government has forced
international agencies to remove from their websites
satellite pictures of the areas hit by the 8 October
earthquake.
A senior official at the International Charter on
Space and Major Disasters told Nature that Pakistan
feared the images might compromise security in Kashmir — territory
that has long been fought over by India and Pakistan.
International aid agencies were obliged to comply,
said the official, because they need the government's
cooperation to help those affected by the earthquake.
But local relief organisations need access to the
images to pinpoint badly affected areas and navigable
roads.
When Hurricane Katrina hit the United States in August,
academics and Internet users rapidly gathered vast
amounts of satellite data, which relief workers could
view using software freely available online.
But since the Pakistan earthquake, Internet users
have not been able to do as much. This has led Pakistani
relief workers to write to organisations such as NASA,
pleading for access to updated images |
China reported a fresh outbreak
of a deadly strain of bird flu on Wednesday amid new
reports of the avian illness in Russia, Romania and
Macedonia.
China's state news agency, Xinhua, reported Wednesday
that 2,600 birds died of the H5N1 strain of bird
flu in the country's northern region.
Xinhua said the birds were discovered in a breeding
facility near the village of Hohhot, the capital of
Inner Mongolia. The news agency didn't provide any
details other than to say that the "epidemic is
under control."
China had earlier outbreaks of bird flu this year
in Qinghai, Xinjiang, and Tibet.
In neighbouring Russia, agricultural officials are
waiting for final confirmation of the H5N1 strain in
wild ducks near Moscow. Hundreds of birds died suddenly
in the country's Tula region, about 200 kilometres
south of the capital.
If the tests are positive, it would be the first time
the virus has shown up west of the Ural Mountains,
in what is European Russia. Authorities have already
killed 60,000 birds to stop the spread of the disease
in earlier outbreaks.
European Union officials said Wednesday that bird
flu is suspected in a small village in southern Macedonia.
Macedonia borders Greece, where another bird flu outbreak
is under investigation.
Macedonia officials plan to kill 10,000 chickens to
contain the outbreak. In Romania, tests have confirmed
the deadly H5N1 virus in a second location in the eastern
Danube Delta region.
The strain was first confirmed in the same region
last weekend. As many as 45,000 birds were destroyed.
The Danube delta is Europe's largest wetlands and
a major migratory area for wild birds between Europe
and Africa.
Health officials stress that the H5N1 strain of avian
flu is not easily transmitted between human beings,
and that all human cases have taken place in Asia among
people are in close contact with birds on a regular
basis.
The illness has killed 60 people in Asia since 2003.
Scientists fear the H5N1 could mutate into a form
that could be passed between humans, causing a global
flu pandemic. |
KIEV, Oct. 19 (Xinhuanet) --
Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko ordered the government
on Wednesday to take emergency measures to prevent
avian flu from entering Ukrainian territory, the Interfax-Ukraine
news agency reported.
The report said that Yushchenko in a decree ordered
the creation of a commission in three days to formulate
measures and approve precautionary plans by the beginning
of next month.
Yushchenko asked the government to tighten monitoring
of poultry imports and prevent smuggling of avian products.
The country's meat processing factories, stocking and
trading places should also be put under strict scrutiny.
The president also said in the decree that the government
at all levels should offer sufficient financial and
material support to the fight against bird flu.
The concerns over bird flu have grown in Ukraine after
the appearance of the deadly H5N1 virus in neighboring
Romania and nearby Turkey. Greece also discovered a
case of bird flu on Monday. |
No one knows if or when an avian
flu pandemic will hit the world. But we do know that
this is a serious possibility, and that the consequences
could be catastrophic: tens to hundreds of millions
dead worldwide; millions dead in the US; economic damage
that could lead to another major depression as workers
die and others cease working out of fear and the need
to take care of ill family members. Perhaps starvation
would set in as the economy slowed and transportation
ceased for large infected area.
Given these possibilities, one would think that
any government would make preventing and preparing
for this potential catastrophe a major priority.
It's therefore nice to see that, for the Bush administration,
avian flu is a priority. However, the priority isn't
preparing for it but preparing to spin the government's
failure to prepare.
Take this new article on U.S. Health and Human Services
Secretary Mike Leavitt's trip to Asia, the origin of
this disease [Official: Preventing Pandemic Impossible].
Secretary Leavitt of the "see no obstacles" Bush
administration proclaims defeat in advance.
"Can we create a network of surveillance sufficient
enough to find the spark when it happens, to get there
fast enough?" he said. "The chances of that
happening are not good."
But will the US do all it can
to prevent the spread of the disease? A no-brainer
would be for the US and other wealthy nations to
set up a fund to reimburse livestock breeders whose
birds become infected. Since breeders sometime hide
ill birds because of fears of economic devastation
if they are detected and the rest of the breeder's
stock is culled, common sense would indicate that
the world has an interest in making sure that this
compensation is more than adequate. So is
the US moving full steam ahead to create such a fund?
The Secretary made it clear the US intended to do
little:
"He said the U.S. government was considering
ways to help offset the economic loss to Asian
farmers forced to slaughter infected flocks, but
help would be limited. Without subsidies, poor
farmers resist killing their sickened livestock."
While prevention is the best hope for the world, once
a pandemic starts, public health strategies for coping
are three-pronged: vaccination; use antiviral drugs;
and quarantine. None of these approaches is a panacea,
of course, and there are questions as to the degree
of effectiveness of vaccination and antiviral drugs.
There are also open questions regarding the best strategy
to deal with flu epidemics.
As for vaccination, some efforts seem to be underway.
Thoughtfully, the "United States may help finance
some of the $100 million production burden." "May?" "Some
of the burden?" This hardly seems like an all
out effort to prepare for potential catastrophe. And
let's not forget that that $100 million price tag is
for vaccine for the United States only. Other wealthy
industrial countries also will make preparations to
vaccinate at least some of their populations. But what
of the several billion people living in countries too
poor to shoulder this cost on their own? Evidently
they are simply to be left to get infected and die
in their millions. In addition to the immorality of
this, it will be a disaster for prevention in the United
States and the other industrial countries. An epidemic
left unchecked in large parts of the world will be
a breading ground for the virus and for the development
of modified forms of the virus which we may be less
protected by vaccine. So any reasonable strategy for
dealing with the virus would be based upon considering
the entire world as an interconnected system. But not,
evidently, that of the Bush administration.
Another important tactic is preparing stockpiles of
antiviral drugs, such as Tamiflu, to treat people when
they become infected. So is the Bush administration
doing all it can to get as many doses of these drugs
as possible? These drugs are protected by patent, interfering
with the ability of multiple companies to devote their
resources to manufacturing them. United Nations Secretary
General Kofi Annan has made the obvious suggestion
that these patents be suspended in the interests of
protecting millions of people. Secretary Leavitt's
response is that U.S. intellectual property rights
would not allow such action. No urgent call for suspending
those rights in an emergency from the administration
that has deemed virtually no human right worth protecting
as it pursues its GWOT (Global War on Terror).
As for quarantine, the Secretary says the country
isn't ready, but hasn't outlined a detailed approach
to make it ready. Obviously, such an approach should
be developed in close coordination with the career
professionals in the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and state public health agencies whose job
it is to protect the public from health dangers. However,
President Bush's main idea was to propose giving the
military, those experts in preserving the health of
the public, a key role in imposing quarantines. As
usual, the administration is more concerned with using
the potential crisis to advance its agenda of militarizing
American society than with actually preventing or coping
with the crisis.
Never fear, however. Should a pandemic hit these shores
Secretary Leavitt has already outlined the administration's
excuse. It's all the fault of those other people, those
individuals, families and public officials who were
too shortsighted to prepare:
"People have not exercised adequate personal
preparedness to last more than three or four days in
their normal environment without going to the store," he
said. "What's the responsibility of communities?
What's the responsibility of families? Is it important
that the mayor of a small town be thinking about a
decision between Tamiflu and a swimming pool?"
I guess all that's needed is to trade in that swimming
pool for a stock of the (unavailable) Tamiflu. If you
don't, the catastrophe, should it occur, is your fault,
just as those selfish people in New Orleans are responsible
for their suffering as they refused to evacuate and
their local officials neglected to ask for FEMA's assistance.
Stephen Soldz, a researcher and psychoanalyst,
is Director of the Center for Research, Evaluation,
and Program Development at the Boston Graduate School
of Psychoanalysis. He is a member of Roslindale Neighbors
for Peace and Justice and founder of Psychoanalysts
for Peace and Justice. He maintains the Iraq
Occupation and Resistance Report web page. He
can be reached at: ssoldz@bgsp.edu. |
On the fourth
anniversary of the September 11th attacks, Laura Knight-Jadczyk
announces the availability of her latest book:
In the years since the 9/11 attacks, dozens of books
have sought to explore the truth behind the official
version of events that day - yet to date, none of
these publications has provided a satisfactory answer
as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately
responsible for carrying them out.
Taking a broad, millennia-long perspective, Laura
Knight-Jadczyk's 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth uncovers the true nature of
the ruling elite on our planet and presents new and
ground-breaking insights into just how the 9/11 attacks
played out.
9/11: The Ultimate
Truth makes a strong case for the idea that September
11, 2001 marked the moment when our planet entered
the final phase of a diabolical plan that has been
many, many years in the making. It is a plan developed
and nurtured by successive generations of ruthless
individuals who relentlessly exploit the negative
aspects of basic human nature to entrap humanity as
a whole in endless wars and suffering in order to
keep us confused and distracted to the reality of
the man behind the curtain.
Drawing on historical and genealogical sources, Knight-Jadczyk
eloquently links the 9/11 event to the modern-day
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. She also cites the clear
evidence that our planet undergoes periodic natural
cataclysms, a cycle that has arguably brought humanity
to the brink of destruction in the present day.
For its no nonsense style in cutting to the core
of the issue and its sheer audacity in refusing to
be swayed or distracted by the morass of disinformation
that has been employed by the Powers that Be to cover
their tracks, 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth can rightly claim to be THE
definitive book on 9/11 - and what that fateful day's
true implications are for the future of mankind.
Published by Red Pill Press
Scheduled for release in October
2005, readers can pre-order the book today at our bookstore. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|