|
"You get America out of Iraq and
Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism."
- Cindy Sheehan
|
P I C T U R E
O F T H E D A Y
©2005 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
European experts on avian influenza
and bird migration are holding an emergency meeting
in Brussels Friday, a day after health officials confirmed
the deadly H5N1 virus has spread from Asia to Europe.
Tests confirmed Thursday that the strain has shown
up in dead birds on a farm in northwestern Turkey.
Farmers in the village of Kiziksa have since slaughtered
more than 8,000 chickens, turkeys and ducks.
Infected migrating birds have taken
the virus from southeast Asia to poultry populations
in Russia, Mongolia, Kazakhstan and now Eastern Europe,
but human cases remain limited to four southeast Asian
countries.
The World Health Organization points out that the
H5N1 virus does not spread easily from birds to humans,
but the United Nations body is nonetheless calling
for increased vigilance and precautions.
Later this month, Canada is scheduled to host a meeting
of international health ministers on preparations for
a flu pandemic.
Public Health Minister Carolyn Bennett says Canada's
first line of defence will be taking care of farm workers
who come into contact with chickens and turkeys - specifically,
trying to keep them from falling ill with human strains
of influenza that could combine with the avian form
to spark a dangerous mutant form.
"Poultry workers move
to the top of the list for this upcoming flu shot
campaign," said Bennett, who is a medical
doctor as well as a politician. "Poultry workers
are there and I don't think we would have seen that
before."
Bush steps up bird flu preparations
Such preparations are high on the list of priorities
for U.S. President George W. Bush, who has sent his
Health Secretary to Asia to assess efforts there to
halt the spread of avian flu.
Bush has also met with vaccine makers to encourage
increased production, and set up an International Partnership
on Avian and Pandemic Influenza.
The American president warns that
if a pandemic breaks out, he'll use the military to
enforce quarantines.
"The best way to deal with a pandemic is to isolate
it and keep it isolated in the region in which it begins," Bush
said earlier this week.
Dr. Todd Hatchette, a virologist in Halifax who worked
with the American researchers who developed the first
avian flu vaccine, thinks Bush's newfound interest
in the problem is a good thing.
"When [Americans have been] faced with a new
threat, bioterrorism being the benchmark, a tremendous
amount of funding went into that area.
"I can only expect that with renewed interest
from the States, we'll see a lot more money being pumped
into influenza research." |
ATHENS, Oct. 13 (Xinhuanet) --
Greece has proposed to host a conference of health
ministers from Balkan and Black Sea countries next
month to coordinate response measures to the avian
flu threat, Greek Health Minister Nikitas Kaklamanis
said on Thursday.
"The prime minister has approved plans for
a conference of health ministers from the Balkans
and the Black Sea early in November," Kaklamanis
told reporters after meeting with Prime Minister
Costas Karamanlis.
"The conference is designed to draft a common
plan of action in the case of an avian flu pandemic," he
added.
The initiative came hours after the
European Commission announced that bird samples from
Romania tested positive for avian flu, though adding
that it is not yet clear whether the particular virus
is the Asian strain that is deadly to human beings. |
BEIJING, Oct. 14 (Xinhuanet)
-- A deadly bird flu strain in Turkey and Romania could
spread to Britain, the country's chief veterinary officer
warns.
"Confirmation that highly pathogenic avian
influenza has been found in Turkey and that avian
influenza
is now also in Romania is of concern," Debby
Reynolds, chief veterinary officer at the Department
of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, said
at a news conference Thursday.
"It shows that there is a risk to the UK."
The government said it's doing everything
possible to prevent imported birds from bringing avian
flu into Britain.
Earlier Thursday, The European Union confirmed that
the bird flu virus found in Turkey is the dangerous
H5N1 strain that might spark a pandemic.
The H5N1 bird flu strain does not easily infect humans.
No one in Europe so far has died from it. But over
the last two years, 117 people in Asia, mostly poultry
workers, have caught it -- and 60 of them have died.
The EU has banned the import of live birds, poultry
and feathers from Romania after the discovery of bird
flu there. It has also banned the export of live
birds and feathers from Turkey since Monday after the
virus was discovered there. It announced on Wednesday
the ban would be extended until April. |
CARACASE, Oct. 13 (Xinhuanet)
-- Venezuela's Ministry of Agriculture announced Thursday
that the country will close its border with Colombia
in three states to avoid the spread of bird flu virus.
The announcement was made after
cases of bird flu were found in some of Colombian
poultry farms.
The Venezuelan government decided to close border
in Tachira, Zulia and Apure until the Colombian government
formally announces a total control of the disease.
Other preventive measures taken in Venezuela include
a nationwide poultry monitoring system which monitors
poultry viruses and keeps the track of migratory birds
entering the country, and a ban on import of poultry
products from Colombia. |
Time is running
out for many survivors of South Asia's massive earthquake,
as millions of people are in desperate need of food,
medicine, shelter and blankets.
"I've never seen such
devastation before. We are in the sixth day of
operation, and every day the scale of devastation
is getting wider," said the UN undersecretary
general and emergency relief co-ordinator, Jan
Egeland.
The UN estimates two million people
have been left homeless from the quake that killed
about 35,000 people and levelled hundreds of villages.
Relief supplies are pouring into Pakistan, but terrain
and confusion are conspiring to hamper efforts to move
them to where they are most needed. The UN warns that
the relief bottleneck must be eliminated soon or tens
of thousands more may die.
"They will now have their sixth, seventh night
out in the cold. Perhaps even without a tent. They
will also not have water because their spring is gone," Egeland
said.
"They are in a desperate situation. We need more
helicopters to reach them. We need more helicopters
soon. Those who have given helicopters, thank you.
Others, give us more."
Time is also running out for people buried under the
rubble.
An officer with Pakistan's Army Corps of Engineers
admits the few hundred earthquake victims in the capital
city of Islamabad are luckier than most because there's
an abundance of expertise and equipment.
"Yes, we use the dogs, we use the sensors, we
use the other instruments which can detect the breathing,
the heartbeat," he said.
Move outside Islamabad and the situation
grows more desperate by the hour. Relief supplies are
making it to Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistani-controlled
Kashmir, but a critical problem has developed moving
aid beyond that point, into hundreds of isolated mountain
villages.
"With no roads in the beginning, with very little
international presence, and I think it is going as
it could the first week, but I fear we are losing the
race against the clock in these small villages around
these centres," Egeland said.
The smell of dead bodies lingers over many ruins,
as the risk grows of a serious outbreaks of disease.
"For the time being our worry is the spread of
infection, infectious diseases like cholera, measles,
meningitis, also malaria we have to think about," said
Sami Ullah, a World Health Organization official. |
No one in the mainstream media
seems to be working on this, but the big story -- the
one that could dramatically change the course of the
next three years -- is right under their collective
noses.
Dick Cheney and George W. Bush don't like each other
anymore.
And a war between these two superpowers could be the
political version of MAD: Mutually assured destruction.
But this time, the fallout could make America better
in the long-run.
Or not.
What hard, inside information do we have? None. The
evidence is circumstantial, but it is getting stronger
by the day. And you don't need the
National Weather Service to know which way the
wind's blowin'.
Sometime this summer, the vice president all but disappeared
off the face of the earth. This time, not to his undisclosed
location, but mainly to his retreat in Wyomng. You
may recall that even when Hurricane Katrina caused
the biggest crisis in Washington since the start of
the invasion of Iraq, Cheney was not seen for days.
At first, there was just speculation. Earlier in September,
Nora Ephron wondered aloud on the Huffington Post why
Cheney had been absent from the initial days of the
Katrina fiasco. She speculated there was lingering
resentment from the incident in May of this year when
a private plane strayed too close to the White House:
Cheney was rushed to a bunker while a
bicycling Bush wasn't informed, even though his
wife was in the White House at the time, Ephron
compared Cheney to "the dog that did not bark" and
wrote:
So I can only suppose that something has gone
wrong. Could the President be irritated that Cheney
helped con him into Iraq? Oh, all right, probably
not. Could Cheney – and not just his aides
-- possibly be involved in the Valerie Plame episode?
Is Cheney not speaking to Karl Rove? Does the airplane/bicycle
incident figure into this in any way?
A few days later, Jeralyn Merritt over at TalkLeft
moved the story from the land of speculation into the
arena of gossip. Cheney had told a friend that he
was tired of Bush's screw-ups:
A few months ago, I heard of a lunch conversation
that Cheney had with a political type in Wyoming.
I have no idea if it's true or not, but it makes
some sense. Here's the tale:
Cheney has been getting tired of being called upon
to fix Bush's mistakes. Cheney said Bush is almost
incapable of making any decision. He waffles and
waffles. Then, once he makes a decision, he refuses
to change it. Because of his born-again faith, he
says "It's in the hands of G-d now" and
washes his hands of it. Then Cheney is called in
to repair the damage.
If this story is even remotely true, this may have
been the final straw for Cheney, and he decided to
let Bush try to wiggle his way out of his Katrina
inaction on his own.
Perhaps. We believe the two have fallen out, and the
issue involved is a much more pressing one: Who's to
blame for the Valerie Plame CIA-outing scandal, which
is threatening right now to topple either Bush's closest
aide, Karl Rove, or Cheney's closest aide, Lewis "Scooter" Libby,
or both.
Here's the
best history and timeline of the Plame scandal
that we have read so far. It points to a 2004 article
by Joe Wilson that lays out the origins of the tension
between POTUS and the veep:
Apparently, according to two journalist sources
of mine, when Rove learned that he might have violated
the law, he turned on Cheney and Libby and made
it clear that he held them responsible for the
problem they had created for the administration.
The protracted silence on this topic from the White
House masks considerable tension between the Office
of the President and the Office of the Vice President.
And that was a year ago. Now, it's starting to remind
us of Watergate, and that famous Time cover with all
the president's men in the Nixon White House pointing
fingers at each other. The latest report is that the
Bush administration is becoming more balkanized, with
Rove on the outs and chief of staff Andrew Card and
communications chief Dan Bartlett -- not one of the
sharpest tools in the political shed -- guiding Bush.
And where in the world is Dick Cheney? His location
is more undisclosed than ever. Raw Story has the
latest:
Vice President Dick Cheney was noticeably absent
from a landmark dinner held last Thursday for the
50th anniversary of the conservative National Review
magazine, Roll Call will report in Tuesday editions,
RAW STORY can reveal...
While guests raved about the gourmet food served
at the National Review's 50th anniversary party Thursday
night, they couldn't take their minds off who wasn't
there: Vice President Cheney. His absence dredged
up the question that dominated the blogosphere in
recent months: Where's Dick?
"Not here," was the short answer. "Scheduling
conflict," the party line.
What does it all mean? Well, the good news is that
the information monolith that is the White House may
fall apart as the different factions duke it out. Remember,
Valerie Plame isn't the only secret this administration
holds, and it isn't the biggest one, either. Where
will an aggressive prosecutor take all the finger pointing?
Who knows?
The downside is the White House isn't the place where
you want a power vacuum, either. With anything from
North Korea to the avian flu to the next hurricane
ready to break out at any moment, you don't want two
hands on the same button.
Hopefully, some news organization that covers the
White House will get to the bottom of this. Maybe the
New York Times, as soon as they finish their Judy Miller
opus -- any
day now. |
Now that Judith Miller has been
sprung – and reportedly about
to cash in big time for her difficult time in jail,
let's revisit those "Two
Tense Weeks in July." When I posted this extended
timeline a few weeks ago, it produced some perplexity.
So, open up the timeline in another window and compare
and contrast as we take another trip down memory lane
in July, 2003.
Well, the reports on what Miller has told Patrick
Fitzgerald helps fill in some more of the dots of
this interesting intergovernmental/international/judicial
flap. The Washington Post says:
Libby had a second conversation with Miller
on July 12 or July 13, the source said, in which he
said he had learned that Wilson's wife had a role in
sending him on the trip and that she worked for the
CIA. Libby never knew Plame's name or that she was
a covert operative, the source said.
This is interesting, because if we go back to our
timeline tracking the furious developments that were
going on in both the U.S. and the U.K., we note that
July 12, 2003, was the one of the two days not really
accounted for in previous news stories. In between
the first and second times Miller and Libby spoke,
the following things occurred:
- On July 9, in the UK, Blair's government has
orchestrated the outing of scientist David Kelly
as the source of BBC reporter Andrew Gilligan's
explosive report that the Blair government "sexed-up" its
Iraq intelligence dossier. In the U.S., Robert
Novak talks with Karl Rove (Wilson's op-ed had
appeared three days before).
- On July 11, George Tenet releases a statement asserting
that the "16 words" about yellowcake uranium
shouldn't have been in the president's State of the
Union address. The same day, Karl Rove talks to Matt
Cooper about, among other things, Joseph Wilson and
his wife.
Which makes The Post's conclusion somewhat odd. In
the original story posted on the Web, Friday, September
30, the paper's final paragraph reads:
"Miller's role had been one of the great
mysteries in the leak probe. It is unclear why
she emerged as a central figure in the probe despite
not writing a story about the case."
In the full story in Saturday's paper, that passage
is no longer there. Instead, there is the less speculative: "Miller
never wrote an article on the matter."
Yet, even editing out the earlier passage, the question
hangs in the air: Why was Miller behind bars for three
months concerning sources to a story which that she
never wrote about?
The answer is obvious: Judith Miller emerged as a
central figure because she MADE herself a central figure
and, arguably, BECAUSE she didn't "writ[e] a story
about the case." This is the Judith Miller who,
four days later, wrote words of encouragement to British
scientist David Kelly:
"David, I heard from another member of your fan
club that things went well for you today. Hope it's
true, J."
These don't seem like the words of a disinterested
journalist. These are the words of someone who has
some sort of interest in how a witness performs in
a parliamentary hearing.
How is it that – two years later and after Judith
Miller has spent 90 days in jail for refusing to cooperate
with a criminal investigation – not one media
organization has deemed it important to wonder: Who
is the other "member of [Kelly's] fan club"?
Is it Scooter Libby? Is it John Bolton (who visited
Miller in jail and we know was questioned by the State
Department Inspector General the same day Kelly's body
was found)? Is it someone else? If it is indeed an
American, exactly what is that person's interest in
a British Parliamentary inquiry?
Judith Miller is the missing link
between two different investigations. She's not a mere
reporter. How do we know? Because, she has "reported" none
of this.
Despite these multiple conversations with Libby, Miller
never wrote about Joseph Wilson.
Despite the fact that she revealed the content of
her e-mail to her Times editors – and one of
her colleagues wrote about her receiving the "dark
actors" e-mail – she never was inclined
to pursue what drove a major source of hers to suicide.
Despite the fact that both Wilson and Kelly were critical
actors in twin transatlantic challenges to the integrity
of government assertions in the run-up to the Iraq
War, Miller never offered even an analysis of what
was occurring – even though it is clear that
she was in close contact with individuals close to
both controversies.
Despite the fact, that the challenges were about validity
of intelligence related to weapons of mass destruction – journalistic
turf that she had made her own in The New York Times.
And Miller wrote nothing about this in the days following
either the Wilson op-ed (published in her own newspaper)
or the suicide of an individual with whom her e-mail
indicates she shares a familial intimacy that goes
beyond the usual reporter-source relationship ("Hope
it's true, J.")
Isn't this peculiar?
And, again: WHO is the "member of [David Kelly's]
fan club"
in a position to tell Judy Miller that "things
went well for" him in his testimony on July 16th?
Upon which side of the Atlantic was that person?
The question is, will the true story ever come out?
If what Miller says is true in terms of the concession
that Patrick Fitzgerald made to get Miller's testimony,
the answer may be – probably not.
According to the transcript of her press conference
after being released, Miller states:
Once I got a personal voluntary waiver [from my
source], my lawyer...approached the special counsel
to see if my grand jury testimony could be limited
to the communications with the source from whom
I had received that personal and voluntary waiver.
The special counsel agreed to this, and that was
very important to me...
...I know what my conscience would allow. And I
was -- I stood fast to that.
Well isn't that interesting? Given that we know that
her source (Lewis Libby) had essentially given her
a full waiver a year before, the only thing that was
different was that Fitzgerald finally allowed Miller
to dictate the scope of the investigation! Wow!
A Washington observer with a keen sense of history
told me, "That's like when Woodward and Bernstein
expected Hugh Sloan, Treasurer for CREEP and former
Halderman aide, to name names to the initial Watergate
grand jury but he didn't. "Woodstein" were
stunned and pissed off at Sloan until they learned
the initial prosecutor never dreamed to inquire about
anything beyond the the seven burglars."
If Fitzgerald made this major concession to Miller,
he may have made it impossible to get a clear picture
as to the full motives of the White House with respect
to Joseph Wilson.
If that interest extended across the Atlantic into
the BBC/Blair contretemps (and given Miller's role
in both of them, that is not too wide a leap), Miller
may have succeeded in shutting down that particular
avenue. |
Secaucus - Last Thursday on Countdown,
I referred to the latest terror threat - the reported
bomb plot against the New York City subway system -
in terms of its timing. President Bush's speech about
the war on terror had come earlier the same day, as
had the breaking news of the possible indictment of
Karl Rove in the CIA leak investigation.
I suggested that in the last three years there had
been about 13 similar coincidences - a political
downturn for the administration, followed by a "terror
event" - a change in alert status, an arrest,
a warning.
We figured we'd better put that list of coincidences
on the public record. We did so this evening on the
television program, with ten of these examples. The
other three are listed at the end of the main list,
out of chronological order. The contraction was made
purely for the sake of television timing considerations,
and permitted us to get the live reaction of the former
Undersecretary of Homeland Security, Asa Hutchinson.
We bring you these coincidences, reminding you, and
ourselves here, that perhaps the simplest piece of
wisdom in the world is called "the logical fallacy." Just
because Event "A" occurs, and then Event "B" occurs,
that does not automatically mean that Event "A" caused
Event "B."
But one set of comments from an informed observer
seems particularly relevant as we examine these coincidences.
On May 10th of this year, after his resignation, former
Secretary of Homeland Security Ridge looked back on
the terror alert level changes, issued on his watch.
Mr. Ridge said: "More often than not we were
the least inclined to raise it. Sometimes we disagreed
with the intelligence assessment. Sometimes we thought
even if the intelligence was good, you don't necessarily
put the country on (alert)… there
were times when some people were really aggressive
about raising it, and we said 'for that?'"
Please, judge for yourself.
Number One:
May 18th, 2002. The first details of the President's
Daily Briefing of August 6th, 2001, are revealed, including
its title - "Bin Laden Determined To Strike In
U.S." The same day another memo is discovered
- revealing the FBI knew of men with links to Al Qaeda
training at an Arizona flight school. The memo was
never acted upon. Questions about 9/11 Intelligence
failures are swirling.
May 20th, 2002. Two days later, FBI Director Mueller
declares another terrorist attack "inevitable." The
next day, the Department of Homeland Security issues
warnings of attacks against railroads nationwide, and
against New York City landmarks like the Brooklyn Bridge
and the Statue of Liberty.
Number Two:
June 6th, 2002. Colleen Rowley, the FBI agent who
tried to alert her superiors to the specialized flight
training taken by Zacarias Moussaoui, whose information
suggests the government missed a chance to break up
the 9/11 plot, testifies before Congress. Senate Intelligence
Committee Chair Graham says Rowley's testimony has
inspired similar pre-9/11 whistle-blowers.
June 10th, 2002. Four days later, speaking from Russia,
Attorney General John Ashcroft reveals that an American
named Jose Padilla is under arrest, accused of plotting
a radiation bomb attack in this country. Padilla had,
by this time, already been detained for more than a
month.
Number Three:
February 5th, 2003. Secretary of State Powell tells
the United Nations Security Council of Iraq's concealment
of weapons, including 18 mobile biological weapons
laboratories, justifying a U.N. or U.S. first strike.
Many in the UN are doubtful. Months later, much of
the information proves untrue.
February 7th, 2003. Two days later, as anti-war demonstrations
continue to take place around the globe, Homeland Security
Secretary Ridge cites "credible threats" by
Al Qaeda, and raises the terror alert level to orange.
Three days after that, Fire Administrator David Paulison
- who would become the acting head of FEMA after the
Hurricane Katrina disaster - advises Americans to stock
up on plastic sheeting and duct tape to protect themselves
against radiological or biological attack.
Number Four:
July 23rd, 2003: The White House admits the CIA --
months before the President's State of the Union Address
-- expressed "strong doubts" about the claim
that Iraq had attempted to buy uranium from Niger.
On the 24th, the Congressional report on the 9/11 attacks
is issued; it criticizes government at all levels;
it reveals an FBI informant had been living with two
of the future hijackers; and it concludes that Iraq
had no link to Al-Qaeda. 28 pages of the report are
redacted. On the 26th, American troops are accused
of beating Iraqi prisoners.
July 29th, 2003. Three days later, amid all of those
negative headlines, Homeland Security issues warnings
of further terrorist attempts to use airplanes for
suicide attacks.
Number Five:
December 17th, 2003. 9/11 Commission Co-Chair Thomas
Kean says the attacks were preventable. The next day,
a Federal Appeals Court says the government cannot
detain suspected radiation-bomber Jose Padilla indefinitely
without charges, and the chief U.S. Weapons inspector
in Iraq, Dr. David Kay, who has previously announced
he has found no Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq,
announces he will resign his post.
December 21st, 2003. Three days later, just before
Christmas, Homeland Security again raises the threat
level to Orange, claiming "credible intelligence" of
further plots to crash airliners into U.S. cities.
Subsequently, six international flights into this country
are cancelled after some passenger names purportedly
produce matches on government no-fly lists. The French
later identify those matched names: one belongs to
an insurance salesman from Wales, another to an elderly
Chinese woman, a third to a five-year old boy.
Number Six:
March 30th, 2004. The new chief weapons inspector
in Iraq, Charles Duelfer tells Congress we have still
not found any WMD there. On the 31st, after weeks of
refusing to appear before the 9/11 Commission, Condoleezza
Rice finally relents and agrees to testify. On April
1st: Four Blackwater-USA contractors working
in Iraq are murdered, their mutilated bodies dragged
through the streets and left on public display in Fallujah.
The role of civilian contractors in Iraq is widely
questioned.
April 2nd, 2004. The next day, Homeland Security issues
a bulletin warning that terrorists may try to blow
up buses and trains, using fertilizer and fuel bombs
- like the one detonated in Oklahoma City - stuffed
into satchels or duffel bags.
Number Seven:
May 16th, 2004. Secretary of State Powell appears
on "Meet The Press." Moderator Tim Russert
closes by asking him about the "enormous personal
credibility" Powell had placed before the U.N.
in laying out a case against Saddam Hussein. An aide
to Powell interrupts the question, saying the interview
is over. Powell finishes his answer, admitting that
much of the information he had been given about Weapons
of Mass Destruction was "inaccurate and wrong,
and, in some cases, deliberately misleading."
May 21st, 2004, new photos showing mistreatment of
Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib Prison are released.
On the 24th - Associated Press video from Iraq confirms
U.S. forces mistakenly bombed a wedding party - killing
more than 40.
Wednesday the 26th. Two days later, Attorney General
Ashcroft and FBI Director Mueller warn that intelligence
from multiple sources, in Ashcroft's words, "indicates
Al-Qaeda's specific intention to hit the United States
hard," and that "90 percent of the arrangements
for an attack on the United States were complete." The
color-coded warning system is not raised, and Homeland
Security Secretary Ridge does not attend the announcement.
Number Eight:
July 6th, 2004. Democratic Presidential candidate
John Kerry selects Senator John Edwards as his vice
presidential running mate, producing a small bump in
the election opinion polls, and a huge swing in media
attention towards the Democratic campaign.
July 8th, 2004. Two days later, Homeland Secretary
Ridge warns of information about Al-Qaeda attacks during
the summer or autumn. Four days after that, the head
of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, DeForest
B. Soaries, Junior, confirms he has written to Ridge
about the prospect of postponing the upcoming Presidential
election in the event it is interrupted by terrorist
acts.
Number Nine:
July 29th, 2004. At their party convention in Boston,
the Democrats formally nominate John Kerry as their
candidate for President. As in the wake of any convention,
the Democrats dominate the media attention over the
ensuing weekend.
Monday, August 1st, 2004. The Department of Homeland
Security raises the alert status for financial centers
in New York, New Jersey, and Washington to orange.
The evidence supporting the warning - reconnaissance
data, left in a home in Iraq - later proves to be roughly
four years old and largely out-of-date.
Number Ten:
Last Thursday. At 10 AM Eastern Time, the President
addresses the National Endowment for Democracy, once
again emphasizing the importance of the war on terror
and insisting his government has broken up at least
10 terrorist plots since 9/11.
At 3 PM Eastern Time, five hours after the President's
speech has begun, the Associated Press reports that
Karl Rove will testify again to the CIA Leak Grand
Jury, and that Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald has told
Rove he cannot guarantee that he will not be indicted.
At 5:17 PM Eastern Time, seven hours after the President's
speech has begun, New York officials disclose a bomb
threat to the city's subway system - based on information
supplied by the Federal Government. A Homeland Security
spokesman says the intelligence upon which the disclosure
is based is "of doubtful credibility." And
it later proves that New York City had known of the
threat for at least three days, and had increased police
presence in the subways long before making the announcement
at that particular time. Local New York television
station, WNBC, reports it had the story of the threat
days in advance, but was asked by "high ranking
federal officials" in New York and Washington
to hold off its story.
Less than four days after revealing the threat, Mayor
Michael Bloomberg says "Since the period of the
threat now seems to be passing, I think over the immediate
future, we'll slowly be winding down the enhanced security."
While news organizations ranging from the New York
Post to NBC News quote sources who say there was reason
to believe that informant who triggered the warning
simply 'made it up', a Senior U.S. Counter-terrorism
official tells the New York Times: "There was
no there, there."
The list of three additional examples follows.
Number Eleven:
October 22nd, 2004. After weeks of Administration
insistence that there are terrorist plans to disrupt
the elections, FBI, Law Enforcement, and other U.S.
Intelligence agencies report they have found no direct
evidence of any plot. More over, they say, a key CIA
source who had claimed knowledge of the plot, has been
discredited.
October 29, 2004. Seven days later - four days before
the Presidential election - the first supposedly new,
datable tape of Osama Bin Laden since December 2001
is aired on the Al-Jazeera Network. A Bush-Cheney campaign
official anonymously tells the New York Daily News
that from his campaign's point of view, the tape is
quote "a little gift."
Number Twelve:
May 5th, 2005. 88 members of the United States House
of Representatives send a letter to President Bush
demanding an investigation of the so-called "Downing
Street Memo" - a British document which describes
purported American desire dating to 2002 to "fix" the
evidence to fit the charges against Iraq. In Iraq over
the following weekend, car bombings escalate. On the
11th, more than 75 Iraqis are killed in one.
May 11th, 2005. Later that day, an instructor and
student pilot violate restricted airspace in Washington
D.C. It is an event that happens hundreds of times
a year, but this time the plane gets to within three
miles of the White House. The Capitol is evacuated;
Vice President Cheney, the First Lady, and Nancy Reagan
are all rushed to secure locations. The President,
biking through woods, is not immediately notified.
Number Thirteen:
June 26th, 2005. A Gallup poll suggests that 61 percent
of the American public believes the President does
not have a plan in Iraq. On the 28th, Mr. Bush speaks
to the nation from Fort Bragg: "We fight today
because terrorists want to attack our country and kill
our citizens, and Iraq is where they are making their
stand. So we'll fight them there, we'll fight them
across the world, and we will stay in the fight until
the fight is won."
June 29th 2005. The next day, another private pilot
veers into restricted airspace, the Capitol is again
evacuated, and this time, so is the President.
--
To summarize, coincidences are coincidences.
We could probably construct a similar time line of
terror events and warnings, and their relationship
to - the opening of new Walmarts around the country.
Are these coincidences signs that the government's
approach has worked because none of the announced threats
ever materialized? Are they signs that the government
has not yet mastered how and when to inform the public?
Is there, in addition to the "fog of war" a
simple, benign, "fog of intelligence"?
But, if merely a reasonable case can be made that
any of these juxtapositions of events are more than
just coincidences, it underscores the need for questions
to be asked in this country - questions about what
is prudence, and what is fear-mongering; questions
about which is the threat of death by terror, and which
is the terror of threat. |
Iraqis apprehend two Americans
disguised as Arabs trying to detonate a car bomb in
a residential neighborhood of western Baghdad's al-Ghazaliyah
district on Tuesday.
A number of Iraqis apprehended two Americans disguised
in Arab dress as they tried to blow up a booby-trapped
car in the middle of a residential area in western
Baghdad on Tuesday.
Residents of western Baghdad's al-Ghazaliyah district
told Quds Press that the people had apprehended the
Americans as they left their Caprice car near a residential
neighborhood in al-Ghazaliyah on Tuesday afternoon
(11 October 2005). Local people found they looked suspicious
so they detained the men before they could get away.
That was when they discovered that they were Americans
and called the Iraqi puppet police.
Five minutes after the arrival of
the Iraqi puppet police on the scene a large force
of US troops showed up and surrounded the area. They
put the two Americans in one of their Humvees and drove
away at high speed to the astonishment of the residents
of the area.
Quds Press spoke by telephone with a member of the
al-Ghazaliyah puppet police who confirmed the incident,
saying that the two men were non-Arab foreigners but
declined to be more precise about their nationality.
Quds Press pointed out that
about a month ago, the Iraqi puppet police in the
southern Iraqi city of al-Basrah arrested two Britons
whom they accused of attempting to cause an explosion
in the city. The Britons were taken into custody
by the Iraqi puppet police only to be broken out
of prison by an assault of British occupation troops.
That incident has created a tense relationship between
the British and the local puppet authorities in al-
Basrah, Quds Press noted. |
The
Arabic text of the recently released letter alleged
to be by Zawahiri (al-Qaeda's number two man) to
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in Iraq raises questions for
me as to its authenticity.
The very
first element of the letter is the blessing on the Prophet.
It says:
al-salah wa al-salam `ala rasuli'llahi wa a-lihi wa suhubihi
. . .
(peace and blessings be upon the Messenger of God and
his family and his companions . . .)
the phrase "salla Allahu `alayhi wa alihi wa sallam" (the
blessings and peace of God be upon him and his family)
is a Shiite form of the salutation, because of the emphasis
of the Shiites on the House or descendants of the Prophet.
Because of the cultural influence of Shiism in South
Asia, one does find that form of the salutation in Pakistan
and India among Sunni Muslims.
But before I went to Pakistan I had never, ever heard
a Sunni Muslim add "wa alihi" (and his family)
to the salutation. I associated it strongly with Iran
and Shiism, and was taken aback to hear Sunnis say it
on Pakistani television. Certainly, I never heard that
form of it all the time I lived in Egypt.
I just put "salla Allahu `alayhi wa alihi wa sallam" into
google in English transliteration and *all* the sites
that came up on the first page were either Shiite or
Pakistani Sunni (Chishti, Barelvi, etc.) I tried adding
Misr (Egypt) to the phrase and got a Shiite attack on
the medieval Sunni hardline thinker, Ibn Taymiya. I tried
adding Qaida and got a Shiite attack on Sunni extremism.
I do not believe that an Egyptian like al-Zawahiri would
use this phraseology at all. But he certainly would not
use it to open a letter to a Salafi. Sunni hardliners
deeply object to what they see as Shiite idolatry of
the imams or descendants of the Prophet Muhammad, for
whom they made shrines such as Ali's at Najaf and Husayn's
at Karbala. In fact, hard line Wahhabis from Saudi Arabia
attacked and sacked Karbala in 1803.
Adding to the salutation "the peace and blessings
of God be upon him [Muhammad]" the phrase "and
his family" would be an insult to Zarqawi and to
the hardline Sunnis in Iraq.
Later he refers to Husain, the grandson of the Prophet
Muhammad, as al-Imam al-sibt, "the Imam, the grandson".
I do not believe that a hard line Sunni such as Zawahiri
would call Husain an Imam. That is Shiite terminology.
The letter then says how much Zawahiri
misses meeting with Zarqawi. Zarqawi was not part of al-Qaeda
when he was in Afghanistan. He had a rivalry with it. And when
he went back to Jordan he did not allow the Jordanian and German
chapters of his Tawhid wa Jihad group to send money to Bin
Laden. If Zawahiri was going to bring up old times, he would
have had to find a way to get past this troubled history, not
just pretend that the two used to pal around.
My gut tells me that the letter is a
forgery. Most likely it is a black psy-ops operation of the
US. But it could also come from Iran, since the mistakes are
those a Shiite might make when pretending to be a Sunni. Or
it could come from an Iraqi Shiite group attempting to manipulate
the United States. Hmmm.
The
authenticity of the letter has also been questioned by
al-Qaeda in Iraq. |
CAIRO, Egypt (AP) - A posting
on an Islamic website Thursday accused the United States
of fabricating a letter in which al-Qaida's No. 2 leader
asked for money and laid out the terrorist group's
plans for expanding the insurgency in the Middle East.
"We in al-Qaida declare
that there is no truth to these claims, and they
are baseless, except in the imagination of the politicians
of the Black (White) House," according to the
statement on a website known as a clearing house
for al-Qaida material.
The statement was signed Abu Maysara, who claims to
be spokesman for al-Qaida in Iraq. It could not immediately
be authenticated.
"We call on Muslims not to pay attention to this
cheap propaganda and to remember that the media will
always be the infidels' sole weapon until the end of
the battle," the statement said.
U.S. officials said the letter dated July 9 to al-Qaida-linked
Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, first disclosed
by the Pentagon on Friday and released in full on Tuesday,
was acquired during American operations in Iraq.
In the letter, taking up 13 typed pages in its English
translation, al-Qaida deputy leader Ayman al-Zawahri
recommends a four-stage expansion of the war in Iraq
that would take the fighting to neighbouring Muslim
countries.
"It has always been my belief that the victory
of Islam will never take place until a Muslim state
is established . . . in the heart of the
Islamic world," al-Zawahri wrote.
The letter laid out his long-term plan: the expulsion
of American troops from Iraq, the establishment of
an Islamic authority and the expansion of the war to
Iraq's secular neighbours, including Lebanon, Jordan
and Syria.
The final stage, al-Zawahri wrote, would be a clash
with Israel, which he said was established to challenge "any
new Islamic entity."
The letter, translated by the U.S. government, also
asked al-Zarqawi to provide financial support and urged
him to avoid bombings mosques or slaughtering hostages
to avoid alienating the masses. |
WASHINGTON
- It was billed as a conversation with U.S. troops,
but the questions President Bush asked on a teleconference
call Thursday were choreographed to match his goals
for the war in Iraq and Saturday's vote on a new Iraqi
constitution.
"This is an important time," Allison
Barber, deputy assistant defense secretary, said,
coaching the soldiers before Bush arrived. "The
president is looking forward to having just a conversation
with you."
Barber said the president was interested in three
topics: the overall security situation in Iraq, security
preparations for the weekend vote and efforts to train
Iraqi troops.
As she spoke in Washington, a live shot of 10 soldiers
from the Army's 42nd Infantry Division and one Iraqi
soldier was beamed into the Eisenhower Executive Office
Building from Tikrit - the birthplace of former Iraqi
leader Saddam Hussein.
"I'm going to ask somebody to grab those two
water bottles against the wall and move them out of
the camera shot for me," Barber said.
A brief rehearsal ensued.
"OK, so let's just walk through this," Barber
said. "Captain Kennedy, you answer the first question
and you hand the mike to whom?"
"Captain Smith," Kennedy said.
"Captain. Smith? You take the mike and you hand
it to whom?" she asked.
"Captain Kennedy," the soldier replied.
And so it went.
"If the question comes up about partnering -
how often do we train with the Iraqi military - who
does he go to?" Barber asked.
"That's going to go to Captain Pratt," one
of the soldiers said.
"And then if we're going to talk a little bit
about the folks in Tikrit - the hometown - and how
they're handling the political process, who are we
going to give that to?" she asked.
Before he took questions, Bush thanked the soldiers
for serving and reassured them that the U.S. would
not pull out of Iraq until the mission was complete.
"So long as I'm the president, we're never going
to back down, we're never going to give in, we'll never
accept anything less than total victory," Bush
said.
The president told them twice
that the American people were behind them.
"You've got tremendous
support here at home," Bush said.
Less than 40 percent in an AP-Ipsos
poll taken in October said they approved of the way
Bush was handling Iraq. Just over half of the public
now say the Iraq war was a mistake.
White House press secretary Scott McClellan said
Thursday's event was coordinated with the Defense Department
but that the troops were expressing their own thoughts.
With satellite feeds, coordination often is needed
to overcome technological challenges, such as delays,
he said.
"I think all they were doing was talking to
the troops and letting them know what to expect," he
said, adding that the president wanted to talk with
troops on the ground who have firsthand knowledge about
the situation.
The soldiers all gave Bush an upbeat
view of the situation.
The president also got praise from the Iraqi soldier
who was part of the chat.
"Thank you very much for everything," he
gushed. "I like you."
On preparations for the vote, 1st Lt. Gregg Murphy
of Tennessee said: "Sir, we are prepared to do
whatever it takes to make this thing a success. ...
Back in January, when we were preparing for that election,
we had to lead the way. We set up the coordination,
we made the plan. We're really happy to see, during
the preparation for this one, sir, they're doing everything."
On the training of Iraqi security
forces, Master Sgt. Corine Lombardo from Scotia, N.Y.,
said to Bush: "I can tell you over the past 10
months, we've seen a tremendous increase in the capabilities
and the confidences of our Iraqi security force partners.
... Over the next month, we anticipate seeing at least
one-third of those Iraqi forces conducting independent
operations."
Lombardo told the president that she was in New York
City on Nov. 11, when Bush attended an event recognizing
soldiers for their recovery and rescue efforts at Ground
Zero. She said the troops began the fight against terrorism
in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and were
proud to continue it in Iraq.
"I thought you looked familiar," Bush said,
and then joked: "I probably look familiar to you,
too."
Paul Rieckhoff, director of the
New York-based Operation Truth, an advocacy group for
U.S. veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan, denounced the
event as a "carefully scripted publicity stunt." Five
of the 10 U.S. troops involved were officers, he said.
"If he wants the real opinions
of the troops, he can't do it in a nationally televised
teleconference," Rieckhoff said. "He needs
to be talking to the boots on the ground and that's
not a bunch of captains." |
WASHINGTON -- President Bush said
Wednesday his advisers were telling conservatives about
Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers' religious beliefs
because they are interested in her background and "part
of Harriet Miers' life is her religion."
"People are interested to know why I picked
Harriet Miers," Bush told reporters at the White
House. "They want to know Harriet Miers' background.
They want to know as much as they possibly can before
they form opinions. And part of Harriet Miers' life
is her religion."
Bush, speaking at the conclusion of an Oval Office
meeting with visiting Polish President Aleksander Kwasniewski,
said that his advisers were reaching out to conservatives
who oppose her nomination "just to explain the
facts."
He spoke on a day in which conservative James Dobson,
founder of Focus on Family, said he had discussed the
nominee's religious views with presidential aide Karl
Rove.
Not even a congressional recess nor Bush's preoccupation
with hurricane recovery and affairs of state have shrouded
the continuing controversy surrounding his selection
of Miers to replace the retiring Justice Sandra Day
O'Connor. Debate about Miers' credentials was prominent
on the Sunday television talk shows and has continued
to occupy considerable attention on the Internet.
Some of Bush's conservative critics say Miers has
no judicial record that proves she will strictly interpret
the Constitution and not - as Busy says - "legislate
from the bench." They argue that Bush passed up
other more qualified candidates to nominate someone
from his inner circle.
On a radio show being broadcast Wednesday, Dobson
said he discussed Miers with Rove on Oct. 1, two days
before her nomination was announced. Dobson said Rove
told him "she is from a very conservative church,
which is almost universally pro-life," but
denied he had gotten any assurances from the White
House that she would vote to overturn the 1973 Roe
v. Wade decision that legalized abortion.
Sen. Patrick Leahy, ranking Democrat on the Judiciary
Committee, said: "The rest of America, including
the Senate, deserves to know what he and the White
House know."
"We don't confirm Justices of the Supreme Court
on a wink and a nod. And a litmus test is no less a
litmus test by using whispers and signals," the
Vermont senator said. "No political faction should
be given a monopoly of relevant knowledge about a nomination,
just as no faction should be permitted to hound a nominee
to withdraw, before the hearing process has even begun." [...]
Also, presidential spokesman Scott McClellan acknowledged
there were some prospective candidates who told the
White House that they preferred not to be considered,
citing the ordeal of the confirmation process. [...]
"What we have seen so far," Leahy said, "is
more of a commentary on the litmus tests and narrow
motivations of vocal factions on the Republican right
than it is a commentary on the qualifications of Harriet
Miers." |
Washington -- Calls
by conservatives for Supreme Court nominee Harriet
Miers to withdraw her nomination intensified Thursday
as White House efforts to reassure critics continued
to backfire.
"The calls to withdraw are serious, and they're
going to increase," said Manuel Miranda, chairman
of the Third Branch Conference, a conservative alliance
of groups interested in judicial nominations. "The
more that we heard from the nomination's defenders,
the more people became convinced that there was no
substance in the nomination and that her friends
were her worst enemies."
In the less than two weeks since President Bush announced
he had chosen his White House counsel and former personal
lawyer to fill the pivotal seat of retiring centrist
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, conservative
charges of cronyism and questions about Miers' qualifications
have escalated daily, threatening the nomination.
Miranda, a former aide to Senate Majority Leader Bill
Frist, R-Tenn., predicted that a critical point will
arrive next week when the Senate returns to Washington
from a recess.
By then, Republicans "will have gauged the feeling
out in their constituencies, and at that point they
will be able to determine whether the White House is
delusional or not."
White House spokesman Scott McClellan, in a testy
exchange with reporters, denied that Miers would withdraw. "No
one that knows her would make such a suggestion," McClellan
said. "And no one that knows her record and her
qualifications would make such a suggestion."
Behind the scenes, party activists in Iowa and New
Hampshire say the administration has been asking them
to pressure Republican senators and others harboring
presidential ambitions to support Miers.
Senate Democrats are watching and waiting as Bush's
conservative base roils.
"If ever there was a wait-and-see nomination,
this is it," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, a California
Democrat who has close ties to the Senate Democratic
leadership. "Anything can happen."
Boxer agreed that Miers' nomination is in trouble.
Even a handful of pro-choice Republicans worried about
Miers' stance on abortion -- or anti-abortion Republicans
worried about the same thing -- could ally with Democrats
to defeat the nomination in the Judiciary Committee
or on the Senate floor.
"Just look at the Judiciary Committee," Boxer
said. "You have some people on the Judiciary Committee
who may well decide not to send the nomination to the
floor, and now it all depends on what Democrats do."
Every White House effort to cool conservative opposition
to Miers seems to backfire, including Bush's explanation
of why the White House is stressing Miers' evangelical
Christianity.
"People are interested to know why I picked Harriet
Miers," Bush said Wednesday. "They want to
know Harriet Miers' background ... And part of Harriet
Miers' life is her religion."
On Thursday, Tony Perkins, president of the conservative
Family Research Council, called the administration's
efforts to woo religious conservatives by stressing
Miers' religion "out of bounds."
"We are the last people on Earth
to object to the news that she is a committed Christian," Perkins
said in a statement. "By the same token, this
fact is not grounds for certifying her to us or to
the public. ... Inferences drawn from an individual's
religious affiliation have no place in decisions to
nominate or confirm a judicial appointee."
Jan LaRue, chief counsel of the conservative Concerned
Women for America, issued an extensive position statement
Monday, saying, "We find it patronizing and hypocritical
to focus on her faith in order to gain support for
Miss Miers."
LaRue also presented a list of 17 questions that may
offer a preview of the questioning Miers will undergo
-- from Republicans -- in her confirmation hearings,
which have not yet been scheduled.
"Was Miss Miers' corporate practice primarily
transactions (contract writing and negotiations), or
was it primarily litigation? How many of her cases
involved constitutional issues? What were the issues?
Did Miss Miers do most of the research and writing
herself? Has she argued constitutional issues before
a court? How many times? In what courts? In how many
did she prevail? Are there any published opinions?"
White House efforts to sell Miers to conservatives
by emphasizing her religion and her loyalty to Bush
only provide ammunition to Democrats when they choose
to use it, Miranda warned.
"So let's say they want to attack," he asked. "Who
will defend her?"
A call by Frist to Republican senators last week to
praise Miers on the Senate floor brought one lone voice:
Sen. John Cornyn of Texas. If Miers does not withdraw,
Miranda predicted the confirmation hearings will become
a "dog killing" if she "does not appear
braver and bolder than John Roberts, and as brilliant."
Far from providing political cover, the dearth of
writings by Miers of any sort is feeding doubt on both
sides and throwing an unflattering spotlight on what
little does exist.
"Here's what I know about Harriet
Miers," Boxer said. "I know that she's a
crony of the president. I know she thinks he's the
most brilliant man she's ever met. I know that she
was head of the search committee and wound up being
the nominee, and I know that she is personally anti-choice.
Those are things I know."
Although Miers has never said she opposes abortion,
allies speaking for her have intimated that she probably
is. "She's had every chance to say they're misrepresenting
me, and she hasn't ... nor has she refuted it," Boxer
said.
Democrats complained that Chief Justice John Roberts,
confirmed last month to fill the vacancy left by the
late William Rehnquist, had a short paper trail, but
roughly 65,000 pages of memos, court opinions and other
documents provided a treasure trove compared to Miers'
newsletter columns for the Texas State Bar, Texas Lottery
Commission documents and personal missives to Bush.
"I'm tempted to call my friendly adversaries
on the right and ask them whether we can make some
joint recommendations to the Senate on document requests
of the White House and the line of questioning during
the hearings," said Ralph Neas, president of
the liberal People for the American Way.
Several of Miers' writings have been lampooned, such
as a 1997 letter to Bush in which she declared that "Texas
is blessed" because Bush was governor, and a column
she wrote for the Texas Bar Journal in the early 1990s
that conservative New York Times columnist David Brooks
called a "relentless march of vapid abstractions" whose "quality
of thought and writing doesn't even rise to the level
of pedestrian."
Among the many conservatives calling
for Miers to withdraw is Peggy Noonan, former speechwriter
for the late President Ronald Reagan. Noonan said that
by jettisoning Miers, Bush could force conservatives
to accept the next nominee and Bush "could even
shove Alberto Gonzales down their throats."
Even veterans of Supreme Court nomination battles
say they have never seen anything quite like this one.
"This one so far is in a class by itself," Neas
said. "I'm not sure what's going to happen ...
In my three decades plus, I've never seen such immediate
and widespread disrespect for a president's decision
by activists in his own party. It really is quite extraordinary."
Joseph Kobylka, a political scientist at Southern
Methodist University, said Democrats are smart to lay
low.
"For right now, the wisest strategy for someone
who is unsure about Miers is to stay in the background," he
said. "Stuff is going to come out."
As long as Republicans "keep cannibalizing one
another," he said, "Democrats can sit back
and watch it happen and then pick among the rubble
afterward." |
STOCKHOLM, Sweden - Former Vice
President Al Gore said Wednesday he had no intention
of ever running for president again, but he said the
United States would be "a different country" if
he had won the 2000 election, launching into a scathing
attack of the Bush administration.
"I have absolutely no plans and no expectations
of ever being a candidate again," Gore told
reporters after giving a speech at an economic forum
in Sweden.
When asked how the United States would have been different
if he had become president, though, he had harsh criticism
for Bush's policies.
"We would not have invaded a
country that didn't attack us," he said, referring
to Iraq. "We would not have taken money from the
working families and given it to the most wealthy families."
"We would not be trying to control
and intimidate the news media. We
would not be routinely torturing people," Gore
said. "We would be a different country."
Gore did not elaborate. But last year, he blamed Bush
administration policies for the inmate abuse scandal
at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.
Mike Feldman, Gore's spokesman, did not immediately
comment on Gore's remark when reached by phone in Washington.
Tracey Schmitt, spokeswoman for the Republican National
Committee, called Gore's comments "fictitious
rants that border on dangerous."
"To accuse Americans of participating in 'routine
torture' is absurd and reveals that while Al Gore may
no longer be a leader in his party, he still embodies
the maniacal anger that guides Democrat leaders in
Washington today," Schmitt wrote in an e-mail
to The Associated Press.
Gore also reiterated his criticism that the Bush administration
was too slow in responding to the crisis in New Orleans
after the city's levees failed during Hurricane Katrina.
He said that should have been predicted.
"There were specific warnings that the levees
might break," he said. "But for whatever
reason those warnings were not acted upon in a timely
way."
He said the United States and other countries are
similarly ignoring the threats that global warning
pose to the environment.
"My country is extremely attentive
to the slightest increase in a risk from terror, and
that's appropriate," he said. "But why should
we be so tolerant of risk where the future habitability
of our planet is concerned?"
Gore, who now runs a cable TV channel and is the chairman
of an investment company, did not completely shut the
door to future political endeavors.
"I don't completely rule out some future interest,
but I don't expect to have that," Gore said.
He declined to comment on New York Sen. Hillary Clinton's
possible run for the White House in 2008, but he said
he believes the country is ready for a female president.
"Of course a woman could get elected president," he
said. "I am not going to make any comment on individual
candidates. It's quite premature." |
JERUSALEM - A top United Nations
official accused Israel of depriving Palestinians of
their basic human rights in the West Bank and Gaza
Strip in the name of security.
Hina Jilani, special representative of UN Secretary
General Kofi Annan on Human Rights Defenders, said
that Israel was blocking lawyers, journalists and
rights activists from monitoring potential rights
abuses.
"'Security imperatives' have been allowed to
deprive a vast population of their very basic rights
and these measures need deeper scrutiny by all concerned
if any respect for norms of international human rights
and humanitarian law is to be preserved," Jilani
told reporters in Jerusalem.
"I would remind the government of Israel that
... the absence of peace and security does not excuse
non-compliance with international human rights norms
and international humanitarian law."
The envoy accused Israel of presiding over an "environment
that is totally non-conducive for human rights defenders
to conduct their work with facility or safety" by
hampering access of lawyers, journalists and health
professionals.
She also accused the Palestinian Authority of hampering
the work of human rights monitors in areas under its
control.
"Human rights defenders who have exposed abuses
of power, conditions and treatment of persons under
detention, and corruption in the security apparatus,
have been threatened and intimidated or have suffered
serious harm," she said.
"Lack of access to places of detention in areas
under the jurisdiction of the Palestinian National
Authority have also been reported and need to be urgently
addressed."
Jilani was addressing reporters at the end of a visit
to the region and ahead of the publication of a more
detailed report. [...] |
PARIS -- Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice and her French counterpart warned Iran on Friday
that Tehran faces referral to the powerful U.N. Security
Council unless it backs away from its defiant stance
on nuclear energy.
France and two other European powers have tried
to persuade Iran to drop what the United States insists
is a covert drive for nuclear weapons, but Iran walked
away from talks and has resumed nuclear activities
it suspended during negotiations.
"There's also the option of the Security Council.
It is a course that is available to the international
community, so it's important that the Iranians negotiate
in good faith," Rice said at a news conference
after meetings with French President Jacques Chirac
and French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy.
"We must make the Security Council option credible," Doust-Blazy
said.
The upcoming constitutional vote in Iraq, Lebanese
politics and the potential spread of bird flu were
also on Rice's agenda. She called for complete transparency
between nations to avoid a flu pandemic.
"We believe firmly that there has to be complete
transparency about what is going on with avian flu.
The world should not be caught unawares by a very dangerous
pandemic because countries refuse to share information,
and so that is our very strong concern," she said
at the Paris news conference with French leaders.
France and the United States cooperated last year
on a United Nations resolution calling on Syria to
pull troops and intelligence agents out of Lebanon,
where Syria dominated for nearly 30 years.
Although Syrian troops did depart during a spring
of political upheaval in Lebanon, the United States
and its allies say there is no doubt Syria is still
trying to influence politics under a newly elected
government.
Rice will see Russian President Vladimir Putin and
the country's foreign minister in Moscow for talks
on several Middle East issues, State Department spokesman
Sean McCormack said Thursday. The stop comes as Rice
nears the close of an eight-nation zigzag across Central
Asia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, France, Russia and Britain.
Russia handed the United States and European partners
a subtle diplomatic victory last month when it abstained
rather than vote no on a measure setting up possible
United Nations punishment over a nuclear energy program
in Iran the United States insists is a cover for bomb
making.
Russia is an Iranian ally and is helping the Tehran
regime set up part of its declared nuclear energy program.
The United States is not trying to shut down that partnership,
but does want Russia's cooperation ahead of another
meeting of the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency in November.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on Thursday
dismissed speculation that Moscow might join talks
between Iran and European negotiators Britain, France
and Germany on Tehran's disputed nuclear program.
"As for relations between the European trio and
Russia, we are not expecting any change in these relations.
There is no need for that," Lavrov told reporters.
On Iraq, Rice's Russia visit coincides with the crucial
national referendum vote on a democratic constitution.
Iraqi lawmakers this week approved a set of last-minute
amendments to the constitution without a vote, sealing
a compromise designed to win minority Sunni Arab support
for the charter. Even so, it is not clear whether the
charter will pass.
U.S. and Iraqi forces increased security across the
country Thursday and prepared to impose an overnight
curfew to try to reduce insurgent attacks aimed at
wrecking the voting.
In Washington, President Bush sought to rally U.S.
troops in Iraq ahead of the vote and to brace them
for an expected surge in violence around the time of
the vote.
"The enemy understands that a free Iraq would
be a blow to their vision," Bush said in a video
conference with soldiers from the Army's 42nd Infantry
Division, based in Tikrit. |
BEIJING, Oct. 14 (Xinhuanet)
-- An American woman has been charged with cutting
open her pregnant neighbour's abdomen with a razor
knife in an attempt to steal her baby.
Peggy Jo Conner, 38, attacked her eight-month
pregnant neighbor Valerie Oskin, 30, at her
Ford City, Pennsylvania, home late Tuesday or early
Wednesday, according to Armstrong County District
Attorney Scott Andreassi, who describes Oskin's injuries
as "severe."
Oskin, 30, was then taken to a hospital, where an
emergency C-section was performed. Her baby -- a boy
-- "appears healthy at this time," Andreassi
said.
But hospital officials declined to release any
information about Oskin or her baby.
Connor hit Oskin over the head with a baseball
bat, then drove her about 25km to a wooded area
in Armstrong County, about 80km northeast of Pittsburgh, and
cut open her abdomen, Jonathan Bayer, a state trooper,
said. "She was sliced over an old Caesarean scar
and severely bleeding," he added.
A teenager on an all-terrain vehicle came across the
two women and sought help despite Conner's insistence
that Oskin, who was bleeding from the head and abdomen,
was fine. The boy called his father, who contacted
the police.
Conner was arraigned Thursday on charges of attempted
homicide, aggravated assault and aggravated assault
of an unborn child. She was being held without bail
in Armstrong County Jail.
Thomas Wilks told The Associated Press he is Conner's
estranged husband and said the allegations were "impossible." He
had seen evidence that Conner was pregnant, he told
the AP.
Wilks also said Conner and Oskin were close friends,
the AP reported. |
PARIS, Oct 13 (AFP) - France contacted
Britain -- the current holder of the EU presidency
-- to express its "concern" at the European
Commission's negotiating style at current world trade
talks, the French foreign ministry said Thursday.
Foreign minister Philippe Douste-Blazy telephoned
his British counterpart, Jack Straw, on Wednesday
to complain that the Commission had made offers on
opening access to the EU agriculture market "without
prior consultation with member states," according
to a spokesman.
France, one of the biggest beneficiaries
of EU farm subsidies, has been taken aback by an offer
made by European trade commissioner Peter Mandelson
-- a former British minister close to prime minister
Tony Blair -- at the talks at the World Trade Organisation's
Geneva headquarters this week to slash EU agriculture
subsidies and tariffs.
In the view of Paris, Mandelson overstepped
his brief in make the offer, which it believes violates
a memorandum signed by EU states that demanded consultations
before any significant concessions on the issue.
French foreign ministry spokesman Jean-Baptiste Mattei
told journalists that Douste-Blazy insisted to Straw
that the EU presidency should "ensure that the
Commission respects its mandate."
France on Tuesday slammed a counter proposal by the
United States that would call for even deeper subsidy
cuts by the EU as "unrealistic".
Douste-Blazy also said that Mandelson should "abide" by
the restriction set by the governments of the EU member
states. |
ST. PAUL, Minn. - Four children
in an Amish community in Minnesota have contracted
the polio virus - the first known infections in the
U.S. in five years, state health officials said Thursday.
Dr. Harry Hull, the state epidemiologist, said the
cases do not pose a threat to the general public
because most people have been vaccinated against
polio and are unlikely to have contact with Amish
people. But he said he expects to find more infections
within the Amish community because some of its members
refuse immunizations on religious grounds.
None of the children have shown any symptoms of the
paralyzing disease. About one in 200 people who contract
the polio virus suffer paralysis because of it; others
typically rid themselves the virus after weeks or months.
None of the four children had been vaccinated. Three
are siblings; the fourth is a baby from another family.
The infection came to light when the baby was hospitalized
for various health problems and underwent tests. Authorities
then began testing other members of the community for
the virus.
Officials would not identify the Amish community but
said it consisted of 100 to 200 people.
Hull said the infections were traced
to an oral vaccine that was administered in another
country, probably within the past three years.
The use of oral polio vaccine containing
the live virus was stopped in the United States in
2000. The live-virus vaccine caused an average of eight
cases of polio a year in the United States. The U.S.
and Canada now use an injected vaccine made from the
killed virus.
State and federal officials are investigating how
an infection from a vaccine given in another country
reached Minnesota. Stool or saliva from an infected
person can transmit the virus.
Health officials said they are working with the Amish
community to determine who may have been exposed to
the virus, and to encourage immunizations.
"We have been going house to house, talking with
them about the risk, offering the vaccine and attempting
to collect specimens to see if the virus has been spreading," Hull
said. "Some families have said, `No, thank you,
we do not want to interact with you at all.' Other
families have said, `Sure, we'll get vaccinated. We'll
provide specimens.'"
Without the community's cooperation, Hull said, there
is a chance of an outbreak similar to one that occurred
in 1979 in Amish communities in Iowa, Wisconsin, Missouri
and Pennsylvania. Ten people were left paralyzed by
the disease, according to the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
The last naturally occurring case of polio in the
United States was in 1979, and health officials consider
the disease eliminated in the Western Hemisphere. It
persists in other parts of the world, with the vast
majority of cases concentrated in India, Nigeria and
Pakistan, according to the World Health Organization.
According to the CDC, more than 95 percent of U.S.
children are vaccinated against polio by the time they
enter school. |
'I
saw a fireball!'
A SUDDEN, intense fireball exploded on the A16 in
Louth, a motorist has claimed. |
Louth Leader |
Returning from a long journey,
pensioner Michael Nixon was three hundred yards short
of the A16 roundabout near Kenwick tip.
The former serviceman, from Walmsgate, near Louth, has
no explanation for what happened next.
Mr Nixon, 74, said: "I experienced what I can
only describe as a fireball.
"Directly in front of my windscreen, an explosive
flash of red light occurred, appearing to be the
size of a football but filling my field of vision."
The phenomenon, which the pensioner said lasted a
second, was witnessed on Tuesday, September 13.
Mr Nixon said: "The intensity and suddenness caused
me to flinch; my eyes hurt. There was no noise, no
sign of smoke and my car was unmarked. Was this seen
by anyone else?"
He added two years ago he was the victim of another
bizarre phenomenon when he was traveling along the
same spot
Mr Nixon said: "I had a SAAB car which never
missed a beat. It was very reliable, but its engine
stopped completely.
"I saw a motorist at the roadside, bonnet raised,
peering at his engine. I suppose he had experienced
the same engine failure. I wish I would have spoken
to him now.
"Are we the possessors of a Kenwick Triangle?" |
NETWORKING is a bore. All that smiling, small talk and
swapping business cards. We all know that networking
is an inevitable part of shinning up the greasy pole,
although few people really enjoy it, if they’re
honest. But don’t worry, it is about to get a whole
lot easier.
Ian Pearson, BT’s futurologist,
says that in just a few years’ time we will
have digital egos. These could be in the
form of badges which would be encoded to radiate
personal information including our work skills,
business interests, social and even sexual preferences.
You could then tailor the information available
to your circumstances. During a conference, for
example, your badge could radiate information on
your business interests and the type of deals you
are hoping to make. As you come close to people
with compatable interests then you will be alerted
to each others’ presence. “Simple embryonic
versions of these devices are available now but
they are very expensive. They will become much
more mainstream in the next couple of years and
could cost just a couple of pounds each,” Pearson
says. Digital egos could be developed so that you
could see each other’s information displayed
like a personal website on a handheld computer
or goggles.
We will all be wearing goggles — à la Tom
Cruise in Mission Impossible rather than geeky science
wear. As well as reading digital egos we will be able
to watch movies, play video games and see “actuated
reality”. Pearson explains
that companies will be able to tailor how the world is
viewed, with the aid of the goggles, to personal consumer
profiles. For instance, if I like modern buildings
and you like old ones and we both visit the same architect’s
office, you could see a Victorian version of reality
while I see lots of chrome and glass. The position of
the doors, people, etc, will all remain “true” otherwise
we’d be falling all over the place.
“In three or four years from now it will be quite common
to see people wearing these goggles,” Pearson says.
At home we will all have large screens — plasma,
LCD or polymer — capable of beaming life-size
images into our front rooms or studies, linked to webcams,
broadband and voice over IP. Teleworkers will be able
to have “meetings” with life-sized, high
quality images of colleagues and clients.
In 15 to 20 years we will be able to link these systems
to our own nervous systems, enabling us to virtually
shake hands with the people on screen “. . .
or kiss and cuddle, whatever you like. Imagine how
much more fun sex is going to be with this technology:
you will be able to feel what your partner is feeling,” Pearson
says. In 30 to 40 years our entire brains will be wired
up to our communications systems and we will communicate
by telepathy. “Socially it will be so much nicer.
You will have a really deep connection with your friends’ minds,” Pearson
says excitedly — clearly he hasn’t met
my friends. |
ROME (Reuters) - It was the first
day of school, so some students were understandably
nervous. But then again, they were not taking just
any course, but one run by a Vatican university to
teach aspiring demonologists and exorcists.
"There is no doubt that the devil is intervening
more in the life of man these days," Father
Paolo Scarafoni told the students, most of them priests
who want to learn how to tackle the demon if they
should ever encounter him.
"Not all of you will become exorcists but it
is indispensable that every priest knows how to discern
between demonic possession and psychological problems," he
said.
The four-month course, called "Exorcism and
the Prayer of Liberation," is being offered for
the second year by Pontifical Regina Apostolorum University
on Rome's outskirts.
The about 120 students from around the world will
hear lectures on topics such as the pastoral, spiritual,
theological, liturgical, medical, legal and criminological
aspects of Satanism and demonic possession.
One planned lecture is called: "Problems related
to exorcism and correlated issues."
One priest, who asked not to be identified, said
he decided to take the course after a "very unsettling
experience" while hearing the confession of one
young member of his parish.
"Her voice changed, her face was transformed
and she started speaking in a language that she did
not know," he said. "I've met people who
are suffering from this problem and it is not as rare
as we might imagine."
So, will he be ready to wrestle with demons of the
kind who may have possessed his parishioner in the
confessional box?
"If, after this course, my superiors decide
that it will be useful for me to become an exorcist,
I will do it," he said.
REAL-LIFE EXORCISTS
Interest in the devil and the occult has been boosted
by films such as this year's "The Exorcism of
Emily Rose," and last year's "Exorcist: The
Beginning," which was the sequel to the original "The
Exorcist" in 1973.
But forget the films. The students will have several
real-life and well known exorcists to teach them.
One is Father Gabriele Nanni, who attended Thursday's
opening class and spoke to Reuters during a break.
"First thing is the priest has to know if the
devil is at work in a person or if the problem is somewhere
else," he said.
Nanni said there are four sure
signs that pointed to demonic possession rather than
psychological problems.
He listed them as:
"When someone speaks or
understands languages they normally do not; when
their physical strength is disproportionate to their
body size or age; when they are suddenly knowledgeable
about occult practices; when they have a physical
aversion to sacred things, such as the communion
host or prayers."
According to some estimates, as many as 5,000 people
are thought to be members of Satanic cults in Italy
with 17-to 25-year-olds making up three quarters of
them.
In 1999, the Vatican updated its ritual for exorcism.
It starts with prayers, a blessing and sprinkling
of holy water, the laying on of hands on the possessed,
and the making of the sign of the cross.
The formula begins: "I order you, Satan..." It
goes on to denounce Satan as "prince of this world" and "enemy
of human salvation." It ends: "Go back, Satan." |
Every morning, the Rev. Micheal
Mitchell prays that if today is the beginning of the
end of the world as we know it, he will be ready.
"Ever since the terrorist
attacks four years ago, I try to live every day
as if it will be the last day," said
Mitchell, 46, senior pastor of New Life Tabernacle
United Pentecostal Church in East Flatbush.
Mitchell's belief that he is watching biblical prophecy
unfold in the form of modern day famines, floods and
earthquakes has grown increasingly urgent. What with
a cataclysmic earthquake swallowing whole villages
in South Asia, coming on the heels of a killer tsunami
and hurricanes that flooded the Gulf Coast and brought
lethal mud slides to Guatemala, apocalyptic anxiety
is running extraordinarily high -- among believers
and nonbelievers alike.
Set against a backdrop of terror threats and worries
that avian flu may morph into a pandemic, it's no wonder
that talk of a biblical-scale reckoning is cropping
up in all sorts of conversations.
"A lot of people are watching the Rapture Index
very carefully right now," said Stephen O'Leary,
an expert on apocalypticism at the University of Southern
California, referring to a Web site that purports to
offer a statistical gauge of the approach of the moment
that Christians believe Jesus will remove the faithful
from Earth.
The Web site -- www.raptureready.com/rap2.html -- currently
registers 161. Anything higher than 145 means "fasten
your seatbelts," according to the legend.
Apocalyptic beliefs have long
been an American staple. A June 2001 survey by the
Barna Research Group, for instance, found that 40
percent of adults in the United States believe the
physical world will end as a result of supernatural
intervention. Fifty percent disagreed, and 10 percent
didn't know.
Mitchell, like many Pentecostals and Charismatics,
believes the seven years of calamities leading to Armageddon
-- the battle in which Jesus will defeat the Anti-Christ
-- may already have begun. Now, he said, he gets almost
daily questions from congregants about how current
events may reflect those prophecies.
"Someone in our men's group asked
whether I thought the earthquake in Asia was a sign of the
coming of the Lord," he said. "I told him that
I believe that that is exactly what's taking place."
Social scientists say that such preoccupations
reflect an increasingly apocalyptic mood in America, expressed
not just in Christian fundamentalism, but also in secular
doom-and-gloom scenarios that forecast widespread flooding
as a result of global warming, or worldwide depression caused
by oil shortages.
Nonbelievers tend to express their
anxieties in terms of manmade ecological disasters or, more
simply, an indifferent and often, hostile nature. If
the recent storms and quakes portend anything, it's climactic
change, not biblical reckoning, said Oliver Haker, 28, an
East Village lawyer.
Others search for a deeper, redemptive meaning behind
so much suffering and despair.
"When I heard about the quake in Pakistan, I thought,
'Wow, this could be it -- we could be entering the
final seven years,'" said Irwin Baxter, president
and founder of Endtime Ministries in Richmond, Ind.,
who does a radio show about biblical prophecy (broadcast
locally at 11 p.m. on WMCA/970 AM) and who lectured
at Queens College last month.
Naysayers note that such predictions are a constant
in human history -- and have always been proven wrong.
"We have an acute need to find an explanation
for suffering, pain and death," O'Leary said.
Certainly, it is a sign of the times that book sellers
report an uptick in sales for books not just about
biblical prophecy, but also that explain disasters
in scientific terms.
Besides the steady popularity of apocalyptic titles,
like the bestselling Left Behind series, "what
we have seen recently is marked interest in books that
help readers understand the issues of the day," said
Bill Tipper, bestsellers editor for Barnes&Noble.com.
Rabbi Irwin Kula, president of the Manhattan-based
National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership,
said that for Jews, as well as Christians, millenial
thinking offers purpose to life. But he warns that
it can also be used to "escape from real world
ethical obligations."
He stresses a Jewish teaching that if one is planting
a tree, and hears the messiah is coming, one should
continue planting. "It's our life-affirming actions
that produce the reality of a messianic future," Kula
said. |
On the fourth
anniversary of the September 11th attacks, Laura Knight-Jadczyk
announces the availability of her latest book:
In the years since the 9/11 attacks, dozens of books
have sought to explore the truth behind the official
version of events that day - yet to date, none of
these publications has provided a satisfactory answer
as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately
responsible for carrying them out.
Taking a broad, millennia-long perspective, Laura
Knight-Jadczyk's 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth uncovers the true nature of
the ruling elite on our planet and presents new and
ground-breaking insights into just how the 9/11 attacks
played out.
9/11: The Ultimate
Truth makes a strong case for the idea that September
11, 2001 marked the moment when our planet entered
the final phase of a diabolical plan that has been
many, many years in the making. It is a plan developed
and nurtured by successive generations of ruthless
individuals who relentlessly exploit the negative
aspects of basic human nature to entrap humanity as
a whole in endless wars and suffering in order to
keep us confused and distracted to the reality of
the man behind the curtain.
Drawing on historical and genealogical sources, Knight-Jadczyk
eloquently links the 9/11 event to the modern-day
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. She also cites the clear
evidence that our planet undergoes periodic natural
cataclysms, a cycle that has arguably brought humanity
to the brink of destruction in the present day.
For its no nonsense style in cutting to the core
of the issue and its sheer audacity in refusing to
be swayed or distracted by the morass of disinformation
that has been employed by the Powers that Be to cover
their tracks, 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth can rightly claim to be THE
definitive book on 9/11 - and what that fateful day's
true implications are for the future of mankind.
Published by Red Pill Press
Scheduled for release in October
2005, readers can pre-order the book today at our bookstore. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|