|
"You get America out of Iraq and
Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism."
- Cindy Sheehan
|
P I C T U R E
O F T H E D A Y
Some
of the people right wing commentators denouce as "hippies"
in front of the White House
September 24, 2005
© Alexander Davidis 2005
For more, see Alexander's other photos:
The Anti-War March in Washington D.C.
Tony Blair has apologised to
an 82-year-old Labour activist thrown out of the
party's annual conference by stewards for heckling
Jack Straw.
Walter Wolfgang, of London, was
ejected after shouting "nonsense" as
the foreign secretary defended Iraq policy.
The prime minister told BBC Breakfast: "I am
really sorry about it, it shouldn't have happened."
Labour says Mr Wolfgang can return for the conference's
final day provided he does not make further disturbances.
Police stopped Mr Wolfgang under
the Terrorism Act when he tried to re-enter on Wednesday,
seizing his pass.
Mr Wolfgang, who escaped Nazi Germany
in 1937, is a member of the Stop the War Coalition.
His heckle came as Mr Straw told
delegates: "We are in Iraq for one reason only
- to help the elected Iraqi government build a secure,
democratic and stable nation."
Manhandled
Mr
Wolfgang, a Labour member of 57 years' standing,
afterwards told BBC Two's Daily Conference Live programme: "These
two toughies came round and wanted to manhandle me
out.
"I said: 'Do you want me to leave? I will leave,
you don't need to manhandle me.' Physically, I am
not too well, so I said I would follow them.
Erith and Thamesmead constituency party chairman
Steve Forrest, who was sitting next to Mr Wolfgang,
was also thrown out after complaining about the stewards'
response. |
The plan to draw up a list of
historical events that people can be prosecuted for
celebrating is a sign of a leader losing his grip
At last history hits pay dirt. For years it was
pap for television. The nation's rulers needed
scientists for guns, linguists for trade and economists
for mistakes. History was for nuts and numismatists.
Now up pops Charles Clarke jingling bags of gold. The
home secretary has promised the prime minister
that he will lock away for five years anyone who "glorifies,
exalts or celebrates" a terrorist act committed
in the past 20 years. He does not care if
glorification was not meant. If someone, somewhere
takes anything that I say or write as encouraging
to terror, even if they do not act on it, I have
committed a criminal act.
Nor is this all. Lest
any crackpot thinks he can dance up and down any
old high street praising Hitler, Mao or Uncle Joe
as outside the 20-year limit, Clarke is preparing
a list of earlier terrorist acts that also render
their celebrants criminals. After "listed" historic
buildings we have "listed" historic terrorisms.
To the glorious chronicles of our island race,
Clarke is to append an open-ended catalogue of
listed events. They may
include any acts of violence against people, property
or, bizarrely, electronic systems anywhere in the
world if intended to advance a political, religious
or ideological cause or to influence a government.
I am told that this astonishing bill was cobbled
together not by Clarke or the lord chancellor, Charles
Falconer, who were both away at the time. The author
was a No 10 wonk who was trying to think up "12
points" to put in Blair's holiday press conference
pack on August 5. The wording recalls the remit of
the old House Un-American Activities Committee in
Washington. It is born of Joe McCarthy out of 1066
and All That, with a dash of the Soviet Academy of
Sciences.
A sure sign of a leader losing his grip on reality
is when he starts meddling with history. New Labour
was born denying its past. As George Eliot said of
women, happy is the one who has no history. Blair's
party was not-Labour, not-Liberal, not-Tory, just "we".
Hence the significance of Clarke's partial cut-off
date in the mid-80s. That was the time when Blairism
first oozed like ectoplasm from the guts of Orgreave
and Wapping.
Terrorism as defined in law more or less covers
the story of the human race. Half
of Churchill's History of the English-Speaking Peoples
must qualify as a listed event. The Crown
Prosecution Service must be staffed with experts
in William the Conqueror, the Black Prince, the New
Model Army, the Gordon rioters, the Tolpuddle Martyrs.
Spin doctors must cut their teeth on Alexander the
Great, Vlad the Impaler, Innocent III and the Counter-Reformation
in Latin America. They must burn midnight oil over
the Albigensian crusade. Blair will be heard screaming
in his attic: "Beware the Da Vinci Code."
This is government by trivia and whim. Already we
are told that Clarke's listed events will not include
anything Irish. Why? King William's campaign is life
and breath to loyalist militants, as is the 1916
Easter Rising to Blair's pet insurrectionists, the
IRA. Why should these groups be excused the law?
Soon anyone who visits terror on the British people
will negotiate a "listed events exclusion clause" as
part of their final settlement.
Even without the cliche that
one man's listed event is another's act of heroism,
this is a can of worms. Bomber Harris's
flattening of German cities in the second world
war was specifically described by Churchill as "simply
for the sake of increasing terror". The bombing
of Hiroshima was, to put it mildly, a politically
motivated assault on people and property. Last
month it was not glorified, but it was certainly
celebrated.
Are Hiroshima or Dresden to be listed events? If
not, how can the no less terrorist blitz be listed?
Conrad was in this sense right: "The
terrorist and the policeman both come from the same
basket." I have no faith in Clarke's
Stalinist historians. If Whitehall bureaucrats are
so otherworldly as to find village ponds, conker
trees and rare steaks awash in human hazard, there
is no telling what they will find in the bloodstained
pages of history. They need only to find a dodgy
event and someone to praise it and they will pounce.
The issue is not mens rea or intention to glorify.
To convict, there need only be someone who confesses
to being "encouraged" by the glorification.
It is a stooge's charter.
This extension of censorship renders any apologist
for any liberation struggle vulnerable to prosecution. I
find it astounding that people such as Falconer,
Clarke and the rest of the cabinet can sit round
a cabinet table and pass a measure worthy of Joseph
Goebbels.
Ministers may yet be hoist with
their own petard. I might draw a moral distinction
between Blair's crusade against certain Muslim states
and, say, publicity for al-Qaida violence against
me. I might feel that my war is in a good cause and
theirs an evil one.
The courts are not free to make that distinction.
Any act with terrorist connotations puts not just
its perpetrator but any contributory publicity at
risk. Operation Shock and Awe
against Baghdad in March 2003, in which Britain participated,
was intended to terrify the civilian population to
the political end of toppling Saddam. The name boasted
it.
Government lawyers may argue that states cannot
be terrorists, yet those same lawyers apply the phrase "state
terrorism" to others. Besides, the bill offers
no defence of "good cause". The Crown Prosecution
Service must surely apply the law impartially.
The government's defenders will argue of terror-bombing
from the air that there are distinctions in targeting
and collateral damage. But any self-respecting terrorist
can find similar excuses for horror. At
very least Downing Street is vulnerable to hypocrisy.
Its crude attempt to stoke war fever in the winter
of 2002/3 with briefings of "new smallpox/ricin/anthrax
threat to London" was no less political. It
was meant to frighten the public into supporting
the rush to war. The effect was to disseminate the
same fear as did the supposed terrorists. Bluntly,
the government was doing the terrorists' job for
them. I cannot see how this puts ministers above
their own law.
Downing Street is not alone in playing this tune.
This week Brussels joined in the New Orwellianism.
In a document called Terrorist Recruitment: Addressing
the Factors Contributing to Violent Radicalisation,
the European Commission warns the media not to take
a "reductionist and conspiratorial world view
where inequity and oppression are dominant".
It singles out journalism as offering a "specific
risk" in the fight against terrorism - the risk
of "oversimplification". Journalists should
apparently watch themselves. The edict is the work
of the commission's vice-president and ally of Silvio
Berlusconi, Franco Frattini. Berlusconi is no friend
of the press.
What is going on here? Blair, Clarke
and Falconer are consorting with strange company.
They should remember Montaigne's warning to history: "To
make judgments about great and high things, a soul
of the same stature is needed." Otherwise, said
the great man, we drag history down to the level
of our own vices. Just so. |
The announcement that he had
a strip of granite inside him (could it have anything
to do with the heart murmur?) was unexpected; other
than that, the most arresting, and perhaps most alarming,
aspect of Tony Blair's Labour party conference speech
on Tuesday was how preternaturally unchanged the
great changemaker seems to have been by the events
of the past few years - from the Iraq war and the
suicide bombings of two months ago to the less dramatic,
but not insignificant fact of his own party's greatly
reduced majority in the last election.
To hear Blair in full, shameless
flight is to listen a man whose self-esteem seems
also to have survived, miraculously intact, his
catastrophic adventure abroad and flagging record
at home, for he told us that he is now even more
convinced of his rightness - on everything - than
he was before. "Every time I've ever introduced
a reform in government, I wish in retrospect I
had gone further." [...]
If he is correct, of course, Blair's
findings present quite a challenge to the evolutionary
psychologists who have told us how many aspects of
human nature which originated in our evolutionary
history have indeed fast-forwarded to the future:
they are everywhere in evidence today. Has the human
male's lust for power, for instance, and his reluctance
to relinquish it once attained, changed much since
our ancestors developed on the plains of Pleistocene
Africa? Once you have seen that strip of granite
strutting its stuff, you might think not. |
The Labour
conference was to hold its big debate on Iraq yesterday.
So did they discuss it? Of course not! Instead, a
furious woman from Unison stormed the podium. "I
want to know why I have been stopped from bringing
a bag of sweeties into the conference. It is bureaucracy
gone mad!" she said.
The chairwoman said gravely that the matter would
be referred to the Conference Arrangements Committee,
where it will probably disappear like a dead rat
in a Bastille oubliette.
They will spend hours on the issue and then come
up with a confectionery composite which will be voted
on - by 1.7m block votes to 638,000.
At the time we all looked rather puzzled, until
the steward standing near my seat explained: "I'll
tell you why they're banned, they could be used as
missiles."
Missiles! What has Labour come
to? The party of Hardie, Attlee and Bevan, afraid
that its speakers might be cut down under a fusillade
of Fox's Glacier mints and Fishermen's Friends!
As Hugh Gaitskell would have said: "I will
fight, fight, and fight again to save the party that
I love, no matter how many Liquorice Allsorts you
throw at me!"
Later I learned that an old woman, a known and notorious
leftie, had a bag of Mint Imperials confiscated,
for fear that she might create mayhem by rolling
them along the floor. (However I managed to smuggle
in three of those individual Toblerone things - which,
being triangular and sharp-edged, are lethal anti-personnel
weapons.)
The issue may be tiny, but it is
a reflection of the state of the Labour party now,
combining bombast, vainglory and total paranoia.
Anyhow, Iraq. That's the big issue! But first, a
debate on campaigning, and a speech from Dennis Skinner.
If Tony Blair's speech on Tuesday was a reply to
Gordon Brown, Mr Skinner's was a reply to Tony Blair.
Globalisation? You can keep it. Dennis harked back
to the good old days, when he went on endless marches
and the miners were always on strike. Glorious days,
days of struggle, chaos and power cuts. "I was
very happy, and still am, to participate in the class
war. I say this to every young person in Britain: fight
the class war, not the holy war!"
He got a standing ovation. All over the land young
men and women will be seizing their Werther's Originals
and marching to the barricades. What the new class
war needs is tactics - and Tic-Tacs!
At last, the debate on Iraq. Except nobody mentioned
it. Several people praised the magnificent work done
by ministers to end world poverty and hunger. There
was a video of grateful Ugandan children thanking
the Labour government for the fact that they were
happy and well-fed. But nothing at all about Iraq,
until Barry Camfield of the T&G denounced the
whole thing.
"You cannot force democracy
on people by war, invasion and occupation!"
But even he was received with just muted applause.
Clearly people agreed with him, but not quite enough
to show it. Then we heard from Jack Straw, the foreign
secretary. He did say a word or two about Iraq. Most
of what he said was received by the merest polite
applause, like drizzle on a tin roof.
"We are there for one reason
only - to help the elected Iraqi government build
a secure, democratic and stable nation!" At
this point an elderly man in the gallery shouted: "That's
a lie!"
Dissent, at a Labour conference!
Not permitted. No way. Building democracy in Iraq
is fine, but not at home. Where would it end? Two
tough stewards grabbed this frail old gentleman.
And rightly so - he might have been a suicide bomber,
with a deadly belt containing a dozen sticks of Brighton
rock |
Powers pave
way for secret new world. New laws raise fears of
targeting, loss of rights.
Suspected terrorists as young as 16 will face
house arrest for up to a year without being convicted
of an offence under sweeping laws agreed
to by all Australian governments.
Police will also be able to pre-emptively detain
people for up to 14 days, without charge, if they
suspect they are planning a terrorist offence.
State premiers and chief ministers met the Prime
Minister yesterday and accepted the harsh new laws,
which Queensland's Peter Beattie called draconian
but necessary.
Suspects placed under house arrest would have no
warning of the action until issued orders by federal
police. The court orders would be issued in secret
so any terrorist associates could not be tipped off
about the investigation.
The premiers and chief ministers forced a sunset
clause for the legislation on the Prime Minister,
John Howard. This means the laws will last only 10
years unless extended by future parliaments. The
premiers also won a five-year judicial review of
the laws.
Meeting Mr Howard in Canberra yesterday, the political
leaders were reassured by the judicial checks and
balances, although they left lawyers aghast. AdvertisementAdvertisement
Mr Howard needed the states to agree because the
Federal Government does not have the constitutional
power on its own to bring in some of the changes.
At the heart of the legislative
changes are the tough preventive detention rules
and "control orders" - restrictions such
as house arrest, electronic tagging and tracking,
and bans on approaching certain areas or people.
A court will be able to issue a control order if
it is satisfied "on the balance of probabilities" that
it will substantially help in preventing a terrorist
attack, or if the suspect has trained with a listed
terrorist organisation. Suspects detained will be
allowed to contact a lawyer. However, they will be
allowed to tell only family members and their employer
that they are safe but cannot be contacted. Preventive
detention may also be imposed after a terrorist attack
to preserve evidence.
Safeguards such as having a court approve the control
orders and allowing suspects to challenge them will
be built in.
Mr Howard said "these are unusual
remedies for an unusual situation" to fight "this
shadowy, elusive and lethal enemy".
"In other circumstances I
would never have sought these new powers," he
said. "But we live in very dangerous and different
and threatening circumstances … I think all
of these powers are needed." |
This summer 2005, an immigration
judge in Dallas ordered the deportation of a young
man who was eligible for legal resident status because
his US citizen wife had filed a petition for him,
which the government had approved. They have
five small children, all native-born Texans. His
father is a US citizen. Ayman Ismail never
had been accused, much less convicted, of doing
anything wrong. He had lived in Texas for the
past 16 years.
His legal status would
have been a routine matter, except for one thing: Ayman
Ismail was Muslim and Arab, and a small gang
of Jewish militants in the Dallas District of
the Department of Homeland Security had made
him a target of their crusade to rid the US of
Muslims and Arabs. After
two years of hearings, all of which he appeared
at faithfully, during a hearing in the immigration
court on April 12, they assaulted and arrested
Ayman, and threw him into a jail in Haskell,
Texas, hundreds of miles from his home, his family,
and his attorney. Nothing had changed,
except that the clique of Jewish militants realized
there was no basis in the law for denying legal
status to him. They accused him of having
raised funds for Hamas merely by virtue of his
employment by the Holy Land Foundation, which
ended in December 2001 when US Attorney General
John Ashcroft’s Treasury Department shut
down the Muslim charity.
To achieve by force what they never could have accomplished
in the law, the Jewish militants put him in jail
to break his spirit, so that he would despair of
justice and agree to deportation. After
the July 30 deportation hearing, in which the immigration
judge specifically found that not one shred of evidence
contradicted Ayman’s insistence he never had
any reason to think the HLF assisted Hamas (but ordered
him deported anyway) Ayman decided not to appeal
the order because he could not endure continued incarceration.
The Jewish extremists argued that the HLF was assisting
Hamas by alleviating some of the misery of the victims
of Israeli terrorism in the Occupied Palestinian
Territories. The reasoning of the Jewish militants
went like this. HLF relieves misery and starvation. If
Palestinians think that they do not have to stick
around to relieve the misery and starvation of their
parents and siblings, they will become suicide bombers
and attack Israelis. Since some suicide bombers
are affiliated with Hamas, charity for the suffering
people of the Occupied Palestinian Territories encourages
suicide bombing, and therefore assists Hamas.
Since Ayman had worked at
the HLF designing a web site and sending letters
to donors reminding them to pay what they had pledged,
he was supporting Hamas suicide bombers, and so
was a terrorist. The
Jewish militants argued that the reason for suicide
attacks against Israel had nothing to do with the
cold blooded murder of hundreds of Palestinian
children and thousands of adults by Israeli soldiers,
nothing to do with the bulldozing of thousands
of Palestinians’ homes with the furnishings,
toys, and sometimes families still inside, nothing
to do with the razing of thousands of acres of
Palestinians’ farms and millions of fruit
trees, nothing to do with the confiscation of Palestinians’ property
to build racially segregated settlements and “bypass
roads” for Jews only, nothing to do with
dumping tons of toxic waste from Jewish colonies
and factories on Palestinian towns; nothing to
do with the Israelis’ reduction of Palestinian
life to such unbearable pain without hope of improvement
that the only reasonable alternative for a young
Palestinian might appear to be a death that would
take along some of the enemy. No, the reason
for Palestinian suicide attacks against Israel
was the attackers’ expectation that some
charity would feed their families.
Still, the cowardice of the immigration judge Anthony
Rogers in condemning a man he knew to be innocent
and deporting five United States citizens to Jordan
is no more appalling than the obsequiousness of the
coverage of the trial by CBS News. One who
relied on the CBS broadcast was not told that Ayman
never was accused of any crime, or, for that matter,
that the HLF to date has never been allowed to present
evidence in its own defense in a court. On
the contrary, CBS turned its report over to a government
agent who ranted in the manner of Julius Streicher
about getting rid of terrorists.
CBS did not mention the five
US citizen children. Although a CBS reporter
had attended Ayman’s immigration court hearing,
the broadcast did not mention the finding by the
immigration judge that no evidence contradicted
Ayman’s protestations of innocence. The
immigration judge found that Ayman’s testimony
was straightforward and truthful, and held explicitly
that Ayman’s deportation would cause extreme
hardship to his wife and children. He found
Ayman truthfully testified that while employed
at the HLF he asked his employers about accusations
in the Dallas Morning News that HLF was connected
to Hamas, and that his employers consistently denied
them. He said that Ayman should have
done more to find out whether there was any basis
to the accusations. He did not say what more
Ayman should have done to investigate the truth
of accusations that even the FBI did not believe—accusations
that additional investigation would have confirmed
to be false.
A viewer of the CBS broadcast, however, was not
given such information. Instead, the CBS report
merely regurgitated government propaganda. Josef
Goebbels would have been envious. CBS could
have balanced its report with information about the
trial and about Ayman’s history, but chose
instead to make its broadcast an instrument of government
terrorism—to convince its viewers that there
are Muslim militants under their beds but the regime
will protect them if only they will accept its racist
assumptions and surrender their traditional liberty.
Most of all, the CBS report ignored the total absence
of any evidence linking Ayman Ismail or the Holy
Land Foundation to any illegal activity. Instead,
it relied on the buck naked lies of government public
relations flacks, which easily could have been investigated. Of
course, such sycophancy is par for American journalism,
which cannot be troubled to seek for the truth. Terrorism
does not work by damaging military targets. It
works by creating fear. CBS thus conspired
with the Jewish militants of the Department of Homeland
Security in its terrorism against anybody in America
who might pity the suffering of the Arab people in
the Middle East. |
Writer and journalist Israel
Shamir is one of the most committed Israeli personalities
against the Jewish definition of the State of Israel
and the system of apartheid it has created. His detractors
present this former spokesperson of MAPAM (the Socialist
Party of Israel) and former translator of president
Herzog, as a “Self-hating Jew” whereas
his supporters believe he is “one of the greatest
Israeli intellectuals.” Israel Shamir answers
Silvia Cattori’s questions about the defamation
campaign against him and the ways of fighting racism
in the state of Israel.
War
slanders
Silvia Cattori: What do
you have to say to those who accuse you of
spreading the idea of a “plot in favour
of the Jewish domination of the world”?
Israel Shamir:
What to say is not important because people only
listen to what they want to listen to! All my
books prove there’s no “conspiracy” or “plot”,
but politicians favouring Jews. On the other
hand, certain interests are more powerful than
many conspirators. The aristocracy makes no conspiracy,
they’re happy with having common interests.
Reality is the main interest of the group. There’s
no “conspiracy”.
You are also being criticised
for having granted interviews to magazines
linked to the extreme right. What can you say
about this? What do you think of the extreme
right?
I speak to everybody, not only
to my closest friends. And I do it because I
want to influence people with different views
and I want them to come closer to my viewpoints.
I see no reasons to boycott a journal or a magazine.
I wrote for Haaretz, an Israeli paper
of large circulation, and I did it in “the
proper way” even when this journal publishes
articles written by Israeli extremist Nazis.
In spite of the fact that the New York Times supports
the war against Iraq, I would write for it. I
believe there’s no reason to reject any
media outlet.
When you write about the
opposition between the left and the right as
being obsolete, that it’s important to
gather all available forces to fight against
the common enemy (that is, the United States
and Israel), don’t you fear that evil
alliances may be formed?
I am not afraid of communicating:
with the left or the right, because we have other
things in common. The left/right opposition is
useful for a one-dimension universe, but we live
in a three-dimension world. Therefore, those
elements that may be separated on a line might
be pretty close in another dimension. The world
is not one-dimensional. If you have studied geometry
you can understand what I mean. When it’s
about knowing who our friends or enemies are,
we must go beyond the left/right issue. We must
take into account the position with regard to
the sky and the Earth or, in a more trivial level,
with regard to the United States and Israel,
globalization and our roots. A right-wing alterglobalist
is much more closer to my heart than a sectarian
and globalist Left-winger.
You have published articles
in which you have analyzed the outcome of the
2002 presidential elections and the 2005 referendum
in France as the result of the excesses of
Zionism. This opinion is surprising for most
French. What makes you believe that the situation
in Palestine can influence elections in France?
Zionism is a problem that not
only affects Palestine. This problem becomes
evident in the submission to the United States,
in the predominant influence of the pro-Zionist
voices within the French media, for instance.
The Euro-Palestinian list failed because it limited
itself to the Palestinian problem. If this list
had demanded the elimination of Zionism in France,
which would have meant the rupture with NATO
and the United States; if the representatives
of this list had made a call to completely destroy
the Zionist programme, they would have gotten
a huge amount of votes.
Is it true, as your detractors
say, that you question the existence of the
Nazi extermination camps, the magnitude of
the Jewish genocide?
I don’t know anything
about this controversy on negationism. I don’t
even understand why the French discuss so much
about WWII when it ended a long time ago. But,
since you asked the question, I’ll answer
it. What I actually question is the discourse
based on the holocaust, not the facts. Facts
get a meaning as soon as they are included in
a speech. The based-on-the-holocaust discourse
is linked to the idea that a Jew’s life
or death is more important than that of a goy.
For me, the holocaust was not worse than other
war crimes such as Hiroshima, Dresden or the
besieged Leningrad. The holocaust was one of
the horrible things that took place between 1939
and 1945. I reject any religious and historical
meaning of the holocaust. For me, it’s
an ideological construction that competes with
some other equalitarian discourses about the
war.
The paradox is that accusations
are not only made by extreme rightwing Jewish
institutions, but also by left wing militants.
It’s obvious that, as
can be proved, our enemy infiltrates everywhere.
Infiltration is a sort of a political game, it’s
a classic tactic. Maoists infiltrated the structures
of the social democracy and we know they succeeded.
The “Jewish leadership” [extremist
formation] has been so successful in infiltrating
the Likud that Sharon has lost the support of
the majority. With regard to the left, infiltration
has been massive. But the same things happen
with the right. Infiltration is as old as the
world.
Then, the fact that Amnesty
International remained silent from year 2000
up to 2004, when Israel launched unprecedented
military operations against civilians means
this organization was being influenced too?
Amnesty International is nothing
but another ideological weapon in the hands of
our enemies. If you take a look at the lists
of political prisoners, you’ll find no
prisoners in Israeli jails. On my web site you
can find some interesting articles about this
fact under the title “Down with Human Rights”.
Amnesty International refused to recognize Vanunu
as a political prisoner although he is a conscientious
objector! They [Amnesty International] are so
infiltrated that nothing could be done to save
them. Francis Boyle, an exceptional man, a friend
of Palestine, an international jurist, has written
about this. He’s the one you should talk
to about this problem with Amnesty International.
Putting an end to the apartheid
in Israel/Palestine
Let’s talk about
the resistance of the Palestinian people.
Hamas is presented in the West as a terrorist
movement whose project, as stated in its
statutes, is to “kill all Jews”.
What’s your opinion?
Hamas does not want to massacre “all
Jews”. That’s a fabrication of the
enemy! I have never read or met anybody who has
written or even thought that way. However, we
must be aware of the fact that words can, sometimes,
go beyond people’s thoughts. Voltaire wrote
that mankind wouldn’t be happy until the
moment the last king was hung with the intestine
of the last priest. So, is that a reason to be
afraid of Voltaire and refuse to adopt him? To
kill all priests is not better than killing all
Jews! Voltaire didn’t want to kill everybody.
Sometimes people exaggerate to call attention.
You can’t believe all that’s said!
The idea of the boycott
against Israel, especially in the academic
field, was successful in Europe. Do you think
the boycott – that was effective against
the apartheid in South Africa – might
also be effective against the apartheid that
Israel imposes upon Arabs?
I do not say it does not. But
it is also essential to boycott the people who
support Israel in France as well. It is important
to fight those people who influence politics
and information, like Alain Finkielkraut, Roger
Cukierman and Alexandre Adler. That is the top
priority here, in France, since they enjoy a
great support by Israel, influence on the opinion,
and therefore, on the political choices of the
[French] government. If you are not able to marginalize
this kind of “messengers” who, in
the media or within governments, have the means
to ensure that all you do is useless, you will
not be on the proper line. In the case of South
Africa the boycott was effective because the
South African regime did not have external support!
The fight has to be waged within every country,
not elsewhere. Alain Finkielkraut, Alexandre
Adler, Bernard Kouchner, Bernard-Henri Lévy
and company, are making France yield to the United
States, so that it becomes a colonized country.
So, do you think that neither
the solidarity movements nor negotiations will
work out as long as the media-political world
in the West remains under the influence of
those who collaborate, in one way or another,
with the Israeli occupants and its U.S. ally?
You should know that there is
a real problem within the solidarity movements.
There are people who control and stem the well-intentioned
militants in order to lead them to false debates,
thus weakening the movements that are fighting
in Israel.
If I understood well, you
are stating that Palestinians will continue
sinking as long as those who defend their cause
do not fight the pro-Israeli who work, in their
respective countries and different levels,
with the purpose of hindering any initiative
that runs contrary to Israel’s interests?
It is useful for youngsters
to go to Palestine because they would be able
to see good and courageous people, to get familiar
with an unknown reality and talk about it with
no fear on their return. That could also help
foreign youths to break taboos. But that is no
a panacea. Actually, everyone has to fight there,
where he or she lives. But obviously, we have
to be aware of the interconnections among these
issues as well.
Is it because of your job
as a writer that you devote yourself to the
resistance against the colonial war of your
own country?
In the hands of a soldier, any
weapon aims at the enemy, and I am a weapon.
The sword does not care about the soldier; it
is designed to provide the soldier’s arm
with the greatest effectiveness in order to hit
the enemy. Palestinians are very capable of planting
olives. They do not need my assistance to do
that. Of course, helping them would be very nice
and very good for my soul (and also to give me
some peace of mind), but they need much more
than the weapon to fight. In their hands, I am
that weapon!
Militants like Uri Avnery
or Michel Warshawsky, for example, are not
attacked as yourself by the people from your
own side.
My enemies are not the “soft
Zionists” or zionoides. But, for me, those
people are a waste of time. They want to have
a clear conscience by doing philanthropy. All
I want is to win, to dismantle the apartheid,
to have a state with equal opportunities in the
Holy Land and to show the people a way that would
enable them to move on to the right direction.
But, aren’t you saying
the same things they say, with other words?
We have not decided the same
thing. They criticize Israel’s policy,
but justify the existence of the state of Israel
just as it is built. They state that Jewish people
from all over the world have the right to come
to Israel, although at the same time they support
agreements that, in fact, deny that right to
the Palestinian refugees who were expelled from
their land and want to go back to their land
in Israel/Palestine. That is simple racial discrimination!
When you make a statement
in favour of a state in which Israelis and
Palestinians can live together while the side
of the “moderates” backs the solution
of “two peoples, two states”, is
it not totally utopian?
In France, the Jewish had equal
rights 200 years ago! At that time, that seemed
totally utopian! To say that “defeating
Israel is totally utopian” is racism!
What changes could be expected
when it is known that most Israelis collaborate
with the oppression policy of their government?
What matters is to see things
clearly, to know what is needed, to maintain
-as much as possible- good relations with the
others, to remain –apart from the trends-
united against the enemy. Only then, there will
be a good chance to win. In England, until the
1920’s, the country was led by people trained
in only one school: Eton. How many people could
have gone to Eton? Not thousands. However, they
were able to have full control of England.
During the annual dinner
of the CCJO (Consultative Council of Jewish
Organizations in France), its president criticized
France’s foreign policy before eighteen
ministers, without having any reaction by those
officials. How do you explain so much submission?
This is my explanation: French
elites, as all European elites, are convinced
of the existence of a huge Jewish power. And
it is this belief that has created such a power.
It’s also obvious the best thing would
be that someone –you or somebody else-
could say to those who belong to the elite: “You
know, Jews are not in power. It is not true that
they rule the world”.
Are you optimist with regard
to a possible peace in Palestine?
Regarding Palestine, I’m
completely pessimist. But in the long term I’m
optimist for I’m convinced Palestinians
will succeed, although nothing good could be
expected from the Abu Mazen regime: I believe
all those little steps are meaningless.
What could be suggested
to those who want to act in favour of the rights
of the Palestinian people without wasting their
time in vain actions?
In every country, wherever we
might be, we have to succeed in displacing the
representatives of our enemies. Whatever their
position might be, we must prevent them from
acting easily.
To be precise, who are these “representatives
of our enemies”?
In Switzerland or in France,
their representatives are those who support the
manoeuvres of the United States and Israel. Sharon,
obviously, helps gather people: to speak (bad)
of Sharon is ok. But Shimon Peres is not better
than Ariel Sharon. In your own countries, you
have to support all those who fight honestly
against compromises favouring the United States,
Israel and neo-liberalism. Take action so that
the United States finds itself as much isolated
as possible. And, in my humble opinion, you should
try to establish relations with the positive
forces of the Middle East, and with Russia too.
This country, that was the friend of all honest
peoples, is nowadays at a difficult crossroads.
Russia is very important. Ties must be established
with Russia.
But, how to make ties with
all these dispersed forces?
That’s why I’m here.
We’re like butterflies, we go from one
flower to another and we bring the glad tidings.
The spirit is not dead. People are still alive!
Wonderful weapons were made in Russia to overcome
the enemy: some good books to be translated and
spread. Not only our generation, but the generation
before ours that was inspired by what happened
in Russia. And yet, Russians can still be a driving
force. We must help this driving force. Conscience
and opinion forces need help. You never know.
Maybe they can take us out of this situation
and we can go on.
|
|
Interview made in July 2005 by Silvia Cattori
for Voltaire Network. Inner titles were added by
the editorial staff. |
Note
From Israel Shamir: Interesting
and daring essay by an Israeli English-language
writer Yael Lotan contradicts the well-meaning
(but meaningless) mantra of 'Judaism is not Zionism'. Yael
was the editor of Arts in the socialist zionist
newspaper Al Hamishmar I had a pleasure to write
for, years ago. She lived for a long time in
Jamaica, and now lives in Tel Aviv.
Anyone who wishes to discuss the phenomenon of
Zionism immediately runs into the problem of how
to define it. Unlike the European colonization
of the Americas, for example, or the British domination
of Kenya or India, the Jewish settlement in Palestine
has been given various and contradictory definitions.
The two commonest, and conflicting, definitions
are: 1. «Zionism is the national liberation
movement of the Jewish people;» 2. «Zionism
is one of the manifestations of European colonialism
in the 20th century.» I shall return to these
definitions, their sources and limitations.
I propose to show that Zionism is an essentially
Jewish phenomenon, and cannot be separated from
Judaism (in the religious-historical sense of the
term), and therefore its resemblance to either
national liberation or colonialist movements is
morphological rather than taxonomic, and leaves
various aspects of Zionism unexplained.
What is Judaism?
A prayer called Hamavdil (the Separator), said
by observant Jews every Saturday evening as the
Sabbath ends, praises God who «separates
the sacred from the profane». Judaism is
dominated by the idea of separation. What are the
origins and rationale of this striking characteristic?
- This question ought to be tackled with the tools
of anthropology, psychology, history and sociology.
There must be various reasons why Judaism has not
been investigated with these tools, and why the
few scholars who attempted to analyze the nature
of Judaism tended to produce apologetics. One reason
may be that some of the fathers of modern anthropology
were themselves Jews (e.g., Franz Boas and Claude
Levi-Strauss), and were unwilling or unable to
tackle their ancestral culture with the same tools
with which they tackled exotic ones. But then,
neither did non-Jewish scholars apply to the religion
which gave birth to Christianity the same analytical
methods they applied unhesitatingly to alien cultures
and religions. A rare and illuminating exception
may be found in Mary Douglas' famous book Purity
and Danger, in which she discusses the purity
laws in the Book of Leviticus, placing them in
a broad anthropological context.
But this is a rare study, and it deals only with
the primeval phase of Judaism. It can no more cover
the subject of latter-day Judaism than a discussion
of the early days of the American republic can
cover the subject of the US today. It is time that
someone applied the usual anthropological methods
to the Shulhan Arukh - the all-embracing rule-book
for observant Jews - in comparison with other old
cultures, from the Hindu Brahmins to Papuan tribes.
But even without all these, it is possible to outline
some of the main features of Judaism.
1. The Old Testament defines the Yahwist deity
in terms of what he is not: Jehovah is not the
god of other tribes; He does not share his dominion
over his chosen tribe with any other deity; Being
a deity of the upper air, the wind and the surface
of the earth, he has no dealings with what lies
under the earth, namely, the world of the dead
and the chthonic powers - which accounts for such
biblical assertions as «The dead praise not
the Lord, neither any that go down into silence,» and
for the injunctions against the consumption of
blood and necromancy; Jehovah requires from his
followers to adopt signs to distinguish them from
other people, e.g., circumcision, and the prohibition
of work or lighting a fire one day a week. The
Bible also lay down rules of separation between
different kinds of field crops, a ban on yoking
together an ass and an ox, on weaving fabrics with
mixed animal and vegetable fibres, etc. In the
course of time Judaism added more and more ritual
separations, until it became totally dominated
and obsessed by the business of keeping various
categories of things apart - the pure and the impure,
the sacred and the profane, kasher and taref (ritually
clean and unclean meats), meat and dairy products,
leavened and unleavened dough (during Passover),
silk and cotton, men and women, adults and minors,
and so on.
2. Judaism as we know it began to evolve in the
time of the Second Temple, i.e., the fifth century
BC. Thereafter, the principal separation, namely,
between Jews and «Gentiles», became
entrenched, as the religious leaders Ezra and Nehemiah
forbade inter-marriage between Jews and other people.
Even the Samaritans, who were their brothers from
the northern kingdom of Samaria, were rejected.
Jews who adopted some of the ways of the world
around them were reviled and shunned by the traditionalists
(known in the New Testament as Pharisees). A Jew
who assimilated culturally and socially with the
Greeks and later with the Romans was regarded as
an enemy. The Hellenistic civilization of the Mediterranean
and the Middle East, which was largely extinguished
by Christendom until the Renaissance, was utterly
rejected by the Jews who remained faithful to their
tribal religion. Christianity, with its ambivalent
attitude towards Judaism, which gradually turned
into vicious enmity, made the separation that much
easier.
(It is important to distinguish between earlier
examples of Jewish hostility to strangers - e.g.,
the story of Moses' Ethiopian wife - which reflected
ordinary xenophobia, and the later isolationism,
which was anchored in religious law. The historical
books of the Old Testament show that up until the
time of the Second Temple there was constant inter-marriage
between the Israelites and their neighbours.)
3. After the fall of Judea and the destruction
of the Temple, in the year 70 AD, separateness
became the hallmark of Judaism. Some other nations
circumcized their sons, or worshipped a single
god, sometimes even an unseen god (according to
Tacitus, so did some Germanic tribes), or prohibited
the eating of pigs, but these features did not
lead to a spiritual or social alliance with the
Jews. In later times Islam adopted the main tenets
of Judaism, but was nevertheless rejected. The
biblical verse «The people shall dwell alone
and shall not be reckoned among the nations» became
the motto of the Jews. Judaism adopted the Roman
principle of descent through the female, since
mater semper certa est - the mother is always known
- and with it the notion that Jews are not only
set apart by their religion, but are actually made
of a different, purer, substance, which must not
be defiled by mixed marriage.
In a curious way, the religion and its rituals became
almost secondary, because «A Jew, even if he
transgresses, remains a Jew» - meaning, that
even if he ate pork or lit a fire on the Sabbath,
he was still a member of the chosen people, and could
always return to the fold. On the other hand, a Gentile
can be circumcized and observe all the numerous rules,
yet he remains a goy, and every effort is made to
discourage goyim from trying to convert to Judaism.
Thus Judaism does not really claim to be a universal
religion, like Christianity and Islam, otherwise
it would have sought to convert everyone. This is
the great paradox: that the universal deity the Jews
believe in is not interested in the rest of the human
race, and maintains a separate arrangement with a
particular tribe.
4. The Hebrew word Yahadut, which denotes both Judaism
and Jewry, demonstrates that there is no difference
between the faith and the people. The familiar Jewish
saying that «It is not Israel who kept the
Sabbath, but the Sabbath that kept Israel»,
is perfectly true. The religion, with its endless
prohibitions and rules of ritual purity, preserved
the distinctive identity of its adherents. That was
its function. At the same time, it held out an eschatological
vision according to which at the End of Days the
entire world will acknowledge the supremacy of Jehovah
and recognize Jerusalem as his abode and the Jews
as his priests - «a kingdom of priests and
an holy nation.» It does not suggest that all
men will become Jews! The separation is therefore
a cosmic phenomenon, and will continue even in the
afterworld. In this it differs from the Brahmin caste
- which resembles Jewry in having strict laws of
purity and separation - since in the Hindu religion
the individual»s caste-identity applies only
to a single incarnation, and does not have a cosmic
status.
Modern Times and the Enlightenment
In the 19th century the impact of the Enlightenment
began to undermine Jewish isolationism. In Europe,
where the majority of Jews lived, religious observance
was visibly weakening and assimilation was increasing.
As the surrounding society grew more secular and
open, abandoning the identification of individuals
by their religion, more and more Jews came to feel
uncomfortable in their isolation. But for the violent
crises which rocked European societies during that
period, it is possible that most Jews would have
assimilated, leaving only a few small Orthodox communities
to cling to their traditional way of life. But the
upheavals in Europe in the late 19th century exposed
all the ethnic and religious minorities to existential
dangers, and Jews were traditional targets of popular
discontent and frustration. At this time, antisemism,
whose origins were religious and whose roots went
back to the Crusades, took on a secularized and racist
quality. It has been argued that Jewish separateness
provoked antisemitism, or at least exacerbated it.
Even if so, it may not matter any longer. What is
certain, however, is that the violent outbreaks of
European antisemitism stimulated the mass emigration
of Jews to America and other distant lands.
At the start of the 20th century, when assimilation
was spreading from Western Europe to the more tradition-bound
Jewish communities in Central and even Eastern Europe,
there were three options for the preservation of
Jewish identity. The first was the time-honoured
Orthodox way - namely, the strict observance of the
ritual laws, which amounted to a physical barrier
to assimilation, since you cannot assimilate among
people with whom you cannot share a meal or a drink,
or pass your leisure time, let alone marry them.
The second option was to preserve Jewish identity
by means of «cultural autonomy», as promoted
by the Yiddishist movement known as the Bund - namely,
by encouraging the distinctive Jewish culture in
Yiddish language and literature, in music and various
traditions. This popular movement could join the
progressive current, support radical ideologies,
and even adopt an anti-religious stance, for if there
was a distinctive Jewish culture, it could help preserve
their separate identity, even if the walls it built
around them were not as impregnable as those of Orthodoxy.
Finally, there was the territorial option - namely,
Zionism.
Territorial Separation
What Zionism offered was a way of maintaining Jewish
separateness in the most natural way: by a physical
separation from the rest of mankind. In a Jewish
State it would be possible to preserve the tribe
without having constantly to resist assimilation.
Moreover, it would be possible to achieve a «normalization» of
the Jewish people - while living apart, it would
be «a nation among nations», and like
the others it would consist of different classes
- workers and capitalists, religious and secular
people - who would all be Jews. Furthermore, if masses
of Jews gathered from all over the world to live
in one place, their existence would be more secure
than as minority communities in alien and sometimes
hostile societies. But for this plan to succeed it
had to be located in a place which would not only
be empty of «Gentiles», but would also
have specific Jewish associations - namely, the «Land
of Israel» (the traditional Jewish name for
Palestine). All attempts to create a territorial
solution in another location - e.g., in the Argentine
pampas, in Uganda or Birobidjan - were not Jewish
solutions and remained ideologically and numerically
insignificant.
During the first third of the century the Zionist
option did not enjoy much success. The Orthodox option
was still well entrenched, and progressive Jews were
more attracted by the cultural, quasi-secular, option
of the Bund. The rest were people who were not averse
to assimilation, who regarded Judaism as a burden
which any sensible person would prefer to drop. There
is no doubt that but for the rise of Nazism and its
consequences, Zionism would not have become in the
latter half of the century the success story that
it is.
Since the establishment of the State of Israel, the
two definitions of Zionism quoted at the beginning
of this article have been prevalent, not only in
Israel but wherever the subject is raised. Secular
Jews describe Zionism as one of the national liberation
movements which arose around the turn of the century,
and therefore define every Jewish community the world
over as part of the Jewish People, or the Jewish
Nation; we shall come back to the problems of this
definition. Jews and non-Jews of Marxist background
usually describe Zionism as a colonial manifestation,
but this definition is not quite satisfactory either,
as we shall see.
Zionism as a Movement of National
Liberation
Zionism, then, offered to solve the problem of Jewish
separateness by territorial means. Unfortunately
for it, it turned out that the autochthonous inhabitants
of Palestine, which the Zionist leadership had described
as a handful of Ishmaelite nomads who could be ignored
or driven out, were in fact a nation. Ben Gurion
recalled how, when he disembarked at the port of
Jaffa in 1906, he looked around him and grew alarmed: «What
are all these Arabs doing in my country?» -
Did not Zionism promise to spare the Jews from having
to build walls of separation?! This was the start
of the Middle East conflict. And not only the conflict
between Jews and Arabs. In the first decade of the
century Zionist leaders bemoaned the fact that Jewish
agriculturists in Palestine were employing «Ishmaelite
men and women» in their orchards and homes.
What was the point of immigrating to the Land of
Israel, they said, if there too they had to mingle
with goyim, and «Gentile» women worked
in their kitchens and looked after their children?
The solution proposed was to bring Jews from the
Yemen - known from their communities in Jerusalem
as deeply religious - and employ them instead of
Arabs in the orchards and houses. This was in fact
done in 1906 - the settlement called Sha'arayim was
created near Rehovot, and populated with a Jewish
community imported especially from Yemen. However,
where the Ashkenazi families in Rehovot had received
four acres each, the Yemenites received only one
acre per family, thus ensuring that they would be
unable to support their families by agriculture,
and would have to go to work for their Ashkenazi
neighbours.
But the definition of Jews as a nation is extraordinarily
problematic. It's perfectly obvious that the only
common denominator between European and Yemenite
Jews, or between, say, a Jew from Cochin and a Jew
from Romania, is religion. (It is true that after
two or three generations of living together in Israel
something resembling an Israeli nation has come into
being, just as an American nation and an Australian
nation emerged in their time. However, the periodic
flooding of Israel with masses of new immigrants
hinders the crystallization of an Israeli nation;
but this lies outside the present discussion.) And
indeed, in Israel, after a century of local history,
religion remains the framework of society. Israel
cannot cease to be a «Jewish State»,
or a «State of the Jews». An editorial
in the secular Israeli daily Haaretz expressed
it thus: «The State was established to provide
a national home for the Jewish people, and so it
remains on the threshold of the 21st century. The
Jewish people is a unique ethnic-national entity,
combining religion and nationality... The rules governing
the political scene in Israel are derived from the
axiom that this is a Jewish State... This position
is anchored in Supreme Court rulings and in the laws
concerning the Knesset, which determine that "a
party may not compete in the general elections for
the Knesset if its aims or its acts oppose, openly
or implicitly, the existence of the State of Israel
as the state of the Jewish people» (12 February
1996). The formula «The Jewish people is a
unique ethnic-national entity, combining religion
and nationality,» rests on premises which cannot
be rationally sustained. What kind of «ethnic
entity» can contain both Russian and Iraqi
Jews? Can the term «nationality» do so?
- Clearly not. The one and only common denominator
is the religion, and with it the tradition, or myth,
of a shared origin thousands of years ago. Where
religion fails, Zionism sustains the myth of ethnic
continuity by various other means - archaeology,
the swearing of soldiers in Massada or at the Wailing
Wall, and so on.
Zionism as a European Colonial Movement
People with a Marxist background apply to Zionism
the terms they regard as universal, i.e., those of
materialism, economics and class. And indeed, Zionist
history as a whole resembles that of European colonialism.
The early Zionist leadership was predominantly bourgeois
European, and had strong links with the bourgeois
European governments of the time. Moreover, it enjoyed
the crucial support of powerful capitalist elements,
such as the Baron Rothschild and others. Looking
at the history of Zionism, from the imperialist «Balfour
Declaration» of 1917 to the present Western
support for aggressive Israel, it is easy to draw
parallels between it and, say, the French colonization
of Algeria or Indochina. All the same, it is a different
story. Between the 1920s and 1940s there was a popular
Zionist slogan that often drew fire from the progressive
wing: it was a call for «Hebrew Labour» -
i.e., «Employ Jews, not Arabs!» But though
it expressed indifference to the needs of the Arab
labour force, it could not be defined as racism in
the usual sense of the term, for we have seen that
Yemenite Jewish labourers, who were not «European»,
and did not differ «racially» or culturally
from their Moslem neighbours in Yemen, were actually
imported to replace local Arab labourers. (The Jewish
credentials of the Yemenite community were never
in doubt. On the contrary - rabbis, cantors and radio
announcers of Yemenite background were highly prized
for their vast knowledge of Hebrew and its heritage.)
But if not racism, what did the call for «Hebrew
labour» signify? - Quite simply, the traditional
Jewish separation from the goyim, an application
of the same principles Jews have lived by throughout
the world for centuries.
By contrast, the European colonists in the Americas,
Africa and Asia were attracted by the availability
of a cheap labour force. People migrated from Europe
to various parts of the world in order to enrich
themselves by exploiting the natural resources of
those countries by means of the local labour force.
The Zionist settlement in Palestine from the late
19th to the mid-20th century was a different enterprise.
Before World War II, most of the Zionist settlers
came to Palestine of their own will, not so much
driven by circumstances as impelled by ideological
fervour, often leaving behind them far better conditions
than those they encountered in the «Promised
Land». Those Jews who wished to better their
condition materially emigrated to the Americas, to
Australia and South Africa. As for the money that
Jewish capitalists invested in the Zionist settlement
- this was characteristic Jewish philanthropy (i.e.,
dedicated to Jewish causes), enlivened with sympathy
for the new ideology. When these capitalists looked
for profits, they invested in far more promising
enterprises than the Jewish settlement in Palestine;
(though they probably did hope that eventually there
would be a self-supporting Jewish community in Palestine,
that might in the fullness of time even become profitable.)
It is hardly surprising that the Zionist movement
conducted itself in some ways like other European
colonial movements, since the political thinking
of its central leadership stemmed from the European
worldview of its time. Even when these leaders proclaimed
progressive views, they continued to identify with
Western colonialism. (We must not forget that in
those days even progressive people in the West believed
in the superiority of European civilization.) Certainly,
as far as the Zionists could see, colonialism was
the only viable scenario, and all other strategies
must have seemed totally unrealistic. Zionism rode
on the skirts of European imperialism, and cooperated
with it in order to win its support. When Britain
was the dominant power in the Middle East, Zionism
collaborated with it. Nowadays, when the dominant
power is the United States, Israel serves American
interests because they serve her own. Yet the aim
of Zionism has been to serve not the interests of
Britain or the United States, but the age-old Jewish
goal of a separate existence.
Israeli Zionism
It is natural that the Zionist movement could contain
various currents, because they all flowed to the
same destination - namely, a Jewish state, in which
separateness would be automatic. (Today even secular
Zionists are capable of describing the process of
Jewish assimilation and inter-marriage in the Western
world as «a demographic Holocaust»!)
Many people believe that in a few generations the
only Jews in the world, other than a handful of ultra-Orthodox
communities who maintain their identity in the old,
well-tried way, will be the citizens of the Jewish
State. The rest will assimilate and disappear among
the «Gentiles». That is why Zionism remains
the common programme of nearly all of the political
parties in Israel, from Moledet on the extreme Right
to Meretz on the Left. Its principal tenet is that
there must be a separate Jewish political entity,
and the only question left is by what means this
may be achieved. Right-wingers believe that it is
possible to suppress and perhaps expel the non-Jews
living in Palestine, either gradually by driving
them to emigrate, or by more violent means; at the
very least they seek to confine the Palestinians
to some scattered, closed, supervised reservations.
At the other end of the scale, the most committed
members of the peace camp voice a preference for
a very small Israel, within the pre-1967 borders
or even smaller, provided it is «all ours» -
meaning, without any Arabs, or only a tiny minority
as a testimony to Israeli democracy. In this they
closely resemble the white Afrikaner movement in
South Africa, which, since the fall of Apartheid,
has been clamouring for a separate white state in
Natal Province.
The realization that Zionism is a continuation of
Judaism by other means helps to explain how it can
resemble European colonialism and at the same time
differ from it in important ways, and also resemble
national liberation movements in some aspects and
be quite unlike them in others. The Holocaust provided
Jewish isolationism with a retroactive, if paranoid,
vindication, and is therefore never absent from Zionist
propaganda and apologetics. (I say «paranoid»,
because there is no reason to regard the Nazi extermination
policy as an ongoing threat, any more than African-Americans
are threatened with a return to slavery.) And,
as stated before, today there is little point in
arguing whether or not Jewish separateness itself
provoked antisemitism. Even if it did, then - as
in cases of rape - the victim is not to be blamed.
Today it is difficult to digest the paradoxes of
the Israeli situation unless one considers the aim
of Zionism. It is difficult to understand why in
South Africa the reverse process is taking place
- from Apartheid to unification, despite all the
problems and obstacles - whereas in Israel even the
popular peace-camp slogan, «Two States for
Two Nations», whose motives are ostensibly
enlightened, strives towards the same goal as the
Orthodoxy. There is, of course, a basic difference
between the two main Zionist camps, but it may be
illustrated by the following metaphor: the hawkish
Right wants Israel to remain a thorn in the flesh
of the Middle East, and prefers a state of hostility
over a peaceable solution, whereas the dovish Left
seeks to heal the inflamed wound and turn Israel
into a kind of implant in the Middle East, something
like a cardiac pacemaker or plastic hip-replacement
- an essentially benign, non-infective foreign body.
There is no point in giving good and bad marks to
history. The question is not whether the aim of separateness
is good or bad, but what it signifies and where it
must lead. Because the supra-national empires of
Europe fell apart in the early years of this century,
people often speak of our time as being the «era
of the nation state»; but in reality we are
living in an era of non-nation states. The dominant
power in the world today, the United States of America,
is not a nation state, nor is there such a state
anywhere in the Western Hemisphere, from pole to
pole. Similarly, Australia, Great Britain, India,
China, Russia and Indonesia, are not nation states,
and the same holds true for most of the African states.
As time goes on, there are fewer and fewer countries
whose inhabitants predominantly belong to a single
ethnic-cultural group. The mass migrations of the
past century have greatly eroded the national pattern,
which was never as static as some people imagine.
In reality Zionism, though based on the concept of
a «Jewish nation», gave birth to a state
based on religion, while at the same time trying
to maintain a modern, quasi-secular, quasi-democratic
guise. Yet though there are today some vigorous theocracies
and semi-theocracies - chiefly in the Moslem world
- they do have ethnic-cultural foundations to sustain
them, which cannot be said about Israel, as any visitor
soon perceives. People who believe that it will be
possible in future to maintain a «Jewish State» in
Israel are deluding themselves. Not only the Palestinian
Arabs, but all of human reality will prevent this
dream from materializing. The question remains, how
dearly will the inhabitants of this land still have
to pay before a solution is found. |
JERUSALEM (AP) - Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon
on Thursday reaffirmed his commitment to the U.S.-backed "road
map" peace plan, saying he wanted to dispel speculation
that Israel is putting together an alternative plan.
"There is only one plan, and that is the road
map," Sharon told an economic conference.
On Wednesday, two Sharon confidants raised the
possibility that, in the event of diplomatic deadlock,
Israel could unilaterally withdraw from parts of
the West Bank - including Palestinian towns and
villages - and annex the large Jewish settlement
blocs in the West Bank to Israel.
The road map calls for a negotiated peace deal between
Israel and the Palestinians. It also envisions a
Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza, alongside
Israel.
Sharon said that his office has been inundated with
requests for clarification, including from foreign
diplomats, after his aides floated the idea.
"Israeli will not consider any other plans," he
said Thursday.
"We have one plan, the road map, which we agreed
to. It is backed by the United States and I don't
see any change in their position. This is the only
plan that exists. We have invested a lot of thought
in this. We don't have a better plan than this for
Israel's future and I emphasize and repeat this because
of the rumours on this subject." |
The US military
said yesterday it was opening an investigation into
reports that soldiers based in Iraq were posting
gruesome photographs of dead Iraqis, including explicit
shots of severed body parts and internal organs,
on a Florida-based website in exchange for access
to the site's pay-only archive of pornography.
The photographs have outraged Arab and Muslim
advocacy groups in the US and prompted human rights
organisations to question whether they are not
also a violation of the Geneva Conventions. They
also constitute another potential public relations
disaster for the United States as it continues
to state publicly that it has the best interests
of ordinary Iraqis at heart.
Some of the graphic website
images are accompanied by openly racist comments
from the soldiers who posted them. "What every
Iraqi should look like," is the commentary
next to a picture of a corpse whose brains and
entrails are spilling out. In
another image, six men wearing US Marine uniforms
are smiling for the camera as they point to a burned
body at their feet. The caption: "Cooked Iraqi."
Elsewhere, site visitors are invited to guess which
body part is being depicted. The website owner, Chris
Wilson, has been quite open about what he is doing.
He said his site, which normally features photographs
of the wives and girlfriends of his customers in
pornographic poses, has proved very popular with
the military. About a year ago, in response to complaints
that soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan were having
trouble getting their credit cards processed and
gaining access to the site, he agreed to offer free
subscriptions in return for the graphic images. Those
images, unlike the porn, are openly accessible to
anyone.
Mr Wilson's site is registered in the Netherlands,
putting it outside the purview of the US legal system.
He has pointed out that he is not a member of the
military and so is not subject to their rules. |
On Wednesday U.S. President
George Bush predicted increased violence in Iraq
in the lead-up to a national referendum on Iraq's
draft constitution.
He said U.S. and coalition troops are prepared
for the escalation.
There is evidence of greater insurgency activity
in Iraq already, with almost daily bombing attacks,
most recently aimed at recruits seeking jobs in reconstituted
Iraqi police and military forces. At least 15 people
have been killed in the past two days.
"We can expect they'll do everything
in their power to try to stop the march to freedom," Bush
said.
Bush also asserted that progress is being made,
citing the weekend killing of a key al-Qaeda leader,
the increased number of Iraqi troops capable of guarding
cities, and the closing off of a major route for
terrorists entering Iraq from Syria.
Bush faces growing domestic criticism for the Iraqi
war and the ongoing U.S. military activity there.
At least 1,925 U.S. soldiers have been killed. A
weekend anti-war demonstration in Washington drew
an estimated 100,000 to the capital.
There currently are 147,000 U.S. troops in Iraq.
Tensions in Iraq are sectarian and political. While
the Shia Muslim majority supports the proposed new
constitution, a disaffected Sunni minority opposes
key provisions of the document. The Sunnis ruled
Iraq during the regime of Saddam Hussein. |
NEW YORK (AP) - Soldiers in
the Army's elite 82nd Airborne Division vented their
frustration by systematically torturing Iraqi detainees
from 2003 into 2004, hitting them with baseball bats
and dousing them with chemicals, a U.S. rights group
alleges in a new report.
The Human Rights Watch report, issued Friday,
was compiled from interviews with a captain and
two sergeants who served in a battalion of the
82nd Airborne that was stationed at a military
base called Mercury near Fallujah, the insurgent
stronghold retaken by U.S. forces last year.
The soldiers, who spoke on condition
of anonymity, said the abuse took place almost daily
and often came under orders. Anything short of causing
an inmate's death was allowed, they said.
The residents of Fallujah, 40 miles west of Baghdad,
nicknamed soldiers at the nearby base "the Murderous
Maniacs," New York-based Human Rights Watch
said. "The soldiers considered this name a badge
of honor."
It said soldiers in the elite 82nd
Airborne deprived detainees of sleep, food and water,
subjected them to extreme heat and cold, stacked
prisoners in human pyramids, kicked them in the face,
and put chemicals on exposed skin and eyes.
Defense Department spokesman Lt. Col. John Skinner
criticized the report as a predictable effort to
try to "advance an agenda through the use of
distortions and errors in fact."
Skinner said the military has investigated all credible
allegations of detainee abuse and "looked at
all aspects of detention operations under a microscope."
The Army said Friday it had opened an investigation
into one soldier's allegations that he witnessed
and heard about widespread prisoner abuse, including
torture and a beating with a baseball bat, while
serving at a base in Iraq.
One of the sergeants allegedly told the group that
military intelligence personnel, eager for information,
often instructed soldiers to "smoke" detainees
- called Persons Under Control or PUCs - during questioning,
the report said. "Smoking" prisoners meant
physically abusing them until they lost consciousness.
But the motive was not always to gain intelligence,
one sergeant was quoted as saying.
"Everyone in camp knew if
you wanted to work out your frustration you show
up at the PUC tent. In a way it was sport," he
reportedly said.
"One day (another sergeant)
shows up and tells a PUC to grab a pole. He told
him to bend over and broke the guy's leg with a mini-Louisville
Slugger, a metal bat."
The soldier said anything short of death was acceptable.
"As long as no PUCs came up
dead, it happened," he said. "We kept it
to broken arms and legs."
The timing of some of the alleged tortures coincided
with the prisoner abuse by American forces at Abu
Ghraib near Baghdad in fall of 2003.
"These soldiers' firsthand
accounts provide further evidence contradicting claims
that abuse of detainees by U.S. forces was isolated
or spontaneous," the report said. "The
accounts here suggest that the mistreatment of prisoners
by the U.S. military is even more widespread than
has been acknowledged to date, including among troops
belonging to some of the best trained, most decorated,
and highly respected units in the U.S. Army."
The soldiers quoted in the report expressed much
confusion about what types of treatment were allowed
under the Geneva Conventions, which bar mistreatment
of prisoners of war or civilian detainees. They said
senior officers provided little guidance.
The captain said his complaints were ignored for
17 months, and he was denied a pass to leave the
82nd Airborne's base in Fort Bragg after planning
to meet with Senate staff members, it said.
Army officials said, however, they began their investigation
into the matter as soon as it came to their attention.
[...]
The New York Times reported Saturday that Capt.
Ian Fishback of the 82nd Airborne had raised the
complaints of abuse in letters to the staff of Sens.
John Warner of Virginia and John McCain of Arizona,
both senior Republicans on the Senate Armed Services
Committee.
Human Rights Watch harshly criticized the U.S. military
in its report, saying it has launched investigations
and prosecutions of lower-ranking personnel for detainee
abuse. But in most cases,
the military used closed administrative hearings
where they handed down light administrative punishments
such as pay reductions and reprimands, instead of
criminal prosecutions before courts-martial.
"The military has made no effort to conduct
a broader criminal investigation focusing on how
military command might have been involved in reported
abuse, and the administration continues to insist
that reported abuse had nothing to do with the administration's
decisions on the applicability of the Geneva Conventions
or with any approved interrogation techniques," it
said. [...] |
A branch of the U.S. Navy secretly
contracted a 33-plane fleet that included two Gulfstream
jets reportedly used to fly terror suspects to countries
known to practice torture, according to documents
obtained by The Associated Press.
At least 10 U.S. aviation companies were issued
classified contracts in 2001 and 2002 by the obscure
Navy Engineering Logistics Office for the "occasional
airlift of USN (Navy) cargo worldwide," according
to Defense Department documents the AP obtained
through a Freedom of Information Act request.
Two of the companies - Richmor Aviation Inc. and
Premier Executive Transport Services Inc. - chartered
luxury Gulfstreams that flew terror suspects captured
in Europe to Egypt, according to U.S. and European
media reports. Once there, the men told family members,
they were tortured. Authorities
in Italy and Sweden have expressed outrage over flights
they say were illegal and orchestrated by the U.S.
government.
While the Gulfstreams came under scrutiny in 2001,
what hasn't been disclosed is the Navy's role in
contracting planes involved in operations the CIA
terms "rendition" and what Italian prosecutors
call kidnapping.
"A lot of us have been focusing on the role
of the CIA but also suspecting that certain parts
of the armed forces are involved," said Margaret
Satterthwaite, a New York University School of Law
researcher who has investigated renditions.
The Navy contracts involve more
planes than previously reported - other news outlets
totaled 26 planes; the AP identified 33 planes.
Italian judges have issued arrest warrants for 19
purported CIA operatives who allegedly snatched a
Muslim cleric from Milan in 2003 and flew him to
Cairo, according to FAA records cited by the Chicago
Tribune, aboard Richmor's Gulfstream IV. The jet
belongs to a part-owner of the Boston Red Sox, who
told The Boston Globe that the team's logo was covered
when the CIA leased the plane. Another case involves
two men taken from Sweden to Egypt in 2001 aboard
Premier's Gulfstream V.
Neither the CIA nor a Navy spokeswoman at the Pentagon
would comment for this story. Officials at the Navy
Engineering Logistics Office, or NELO, in Arlington,
Va., didn't respond to messages requesting comment.
Joseph P. Duenas, counsel for the logistics office,
declined to provide the contracts, saying they "involve
national security information that is classified."
The secrecy surrounding the deals
makes it unclear why NELO issued them, but one reason
may be the office's anonymity - the agency is so
buried within the Pentagon bureaucracy that some
career Navy officials have never heard of it.
John Hutson, a retired rear admiral who was the
Navy's Judge Advocate General from 1997 to 2000 and
is critical of the Bush administration's detainee
policies, said he was not familiar with NELO. Told
of its activities, Hutson said NELO employees could
be held liable if they knew the planes would be used
for renditions. Human rights lawyers allege rendition
flights violate criminal law.
The office has been around since
the mid-1970s, according to a former employee who
spoke on condition of anonymity because NELO's activities
are secret. NELO operates under different names:
it's also known as the Navy's Office of Special Projects
and its San Diego location is called the Navy Regional
Plant Equipment Office.
None of those names is listed in the U.S. Government
Manual, the official compilation of federal departments,
agencies and offices. A man who answered the phone
at NELO's Arlington office refused to give his name
or the agency's address, suggesting it may be classified.
In court documents filed in the case of a fired
Office of Special Projects whistleblower, government
attorneys described the agency's principal function
as "the conduct of foreign intelligence or counterintelligence
activities."
The AP learned of the airplane contracts through
a Freedom of Information Act request that focused
on a different subject - permits granted to all 10
aviation companies that let them land at any Navy
base worldwide.
The permits list planes operated by the companies
and a contract number issued by NELO. The numbers
provide some details about the contracts, including
when they were issued, but do not say when they expire.
In the documents the AP reviewed, contracts were
issued in 2001 and 2002 and were cited on landing
permits issued in 2004. The NELO contract numbers
also appear on permits issued in 2003 and 2004 that
allowed seven of the companies to buy fuel at military
bases worldwide.
The permits list 31 planes under
NELO contract other than the two Gulfstreams. They
include a small Cessna; three huge Lockheed Hercules
cargo planes; a Gulfstream 1159a; a Lear Jet 35A;
a DC-3; two Boeing 737s; and a 53-passenger DeHavilland
DH-8 photographed by plane spotters in Afghanistan.
Ownership of the planes is shielded behind a maze
of paperwork and elusive executives.
James J. Kershaw is listed as president of three
of the companies, located in Massachusetts, Tennessee
and North Carolina. Two other companies share the
same vice president, Colleen Bornt. Extensive public
record searches could not locate either of them.
Record searches also failed to turn up information
on Leonard T. Bayard, whose firm bought Premier Executive
Transport Services' Gulfstream. The address of Bayard's
firm is the Portland, Ore., office of attorney Scott
Caplan.
Asked if his client is a real person, Caplan replied: "No
comment." |
AN ORDER banning the public
from accessing documents from the inquiry into the
Dunblane massacre is to be lifted, a move which may
finally answer some of the questions that have remained
over the tragedy.
Sixteen children and their teacher died when Thomas
Hamilton walked into Dunblane Primary School and
opened fire in March 1996.
Documents which were submitted
to Lord Cullen's inquiry into the atrocity the same
year were subsequently placed under a 100-year Closure
Order.
In 2003, the Lord Advocate, Colin Boyd, QC, decided
to review material placed under this order. Members
of the public will be able to view a number of the
files at the National Archives of Scotland in Edinburgh
from Monday.
But files containing details of
the victims, including photographs, medical reports
and post-mortem reports, will still be subject to
the Closure Order.
Parents of some of the victims welcomed the move
as "a good decision", saying it would lift "remaining
veils of secrecy" and dispel a number of conspiracy
theories raised after the incident.
Mr Boyd said: "It is clear that there remains
considerable public interest in the evidence that
was provided to Lord Cullen's inquiry and I am pleased
to announce that we have now completed the review
of the papers subject to the 100-year Closure Order."
Families affected by the tragedy have always been
able to view the full documents, and will be unaffected
by the move.
On 13 March, 1996, 43-year-old Thomas Hamilton marched
into the school and opened fire on teacher Gwen Mayor
and her class of five- and six-year-olds, before
turning the gun on himself. Lord Cullen's inquiry
led to sweeping changes to laws on gun ownership.
Charlie Clydesdale, the father of one of the victims,
Victoria, said: "There've been lots of rumours,
partly due to the fact that the public haven't had
access to these documents, and it's time the last
veils of secrecy were lifted."
He added: "I'd like to have been warned in
advance about the Lord Advocate's announcement. It
will be interesting to see what's in these papers,
but I would be very surprised if we learned anything
new."
Dr Mick North, a former Stirling University lecturer
whose daughter Sophie was another of the children
killed, wrote a book about the tragedy and claims
to be the only parent to have examined the papers
in detail, said it was "a good decision",
but the release had taken him by surprise.
Critics of the Closure Order said its length - which
compares, for example, with just 30 years for Cabinet
papers - had "fuelled a rumour mill" and
led to continual speculation that something was being
hidden.
In 2003, a newspaper claimed a
police report was among the documents suppressed
because it revealed links between Hamilton and a
number of prominent Scots. Sources suggested a former
Cabinet minister gave Hamilton a reference. |
EDINBURGH: Police
were involved in a paedophile ring that covered
up abuse allegations against the man responsible
for the infamous Dunblane school massacre.
The astonishing claim was made by former paramedic
Sandra Uttley, who is going to the European Court
of Human Rights to demand a new inquiry into the
tragedy.
Sixteen children and their teacher were shot dead
by Thomas Hamilton in March 1996 after he burst into
the school gym and fired as they began an exercise
class. The attack prompted tighter UK gun control.
Ms Uttley alleges that Lord Cullen's inquiry into
the massacre was fatally flawed because crucial evidence
was withheld from it.
The 45-year-old, who dealt with the aftermath of
the killings in her job as a paramedic, said: "There
are glaring anomalies in the inquiry, inconsistencies
in witness testimony, incorrect information given
on oath and the absence of vital witnesses.
"It is also blatantly obvious that Central
Scotland Police, who were chosen to investigate the
background to the murders, should never have been
involved in a so-called independent inquiry.
"They were implicated
in the events under scrutiny and continually provided
Hamilton with renewals of his gun licence despite
long-term and repeated warnings that this should
not happen.
"It was known that Hamilton had friends in
the police force, including one highly placed officer.
"I believe that Hamilton was
a major provider of pornographic photographs and
videos to a ring of men prominent in Central Scotland,
including police officers who protected him from
numerous allegations of physical abuse at boys' camps
and clubs he ran.
"They protected themselves after the massacre
which conveniently ended in his suicide".
Last year Ms Uttley's former partner, Mick North,
whose five-year-old daughter Sophie was killed, said
he was
"convinced" of a cover-up.
Detective Chief Superintendent John Ogg, who headed
the Dunblane investigation, has said of criticism
in the past: "I can reassure you that the investigation
was absolutely thorough and we covered every angle".
|
Dante reserved
the lowest circle of hell—the
circle of treachery - for those who violated
trust. He placed quite a few priests, church leaders,
and popes there. They’ll be getting lots of
company...
The larger than usual headline of
the Philadelphia Inquirer lastThursday read, “An ‘Immoral’ Cover-up.” A
grand jury indicted the Philadelphia archdiocese
in a 418-page report detailing
rampant pedophilia and sexual abuse as well as
decades of well planned, sinister cover-up orchestrated
by two Philadelphia cardinals, (the late) John
Krol and (recently retired) Anthony Bevilacqua.
Krol was and Bevilacqua is an outspoken critic
of homosexuality and civil rights for gay and lesbian
Americans.
Here are just a few of the documented
examples of what predator priests did under the protection
of Krol and Bevilacqua:
- An 11-year-old girl was repeatedly raped by
a priest who took her for an abortion when she
became pregnant.
- A fifth grader was molested by a priest inside
a confessional.
- A teenage girl was groped by a priest while she
lay immobilized in traction in a hospital room.
- A priest offered money to boys in exchange for
sadomasochistic acts of bondage and wrote a letter
asking a boy to make him his “slave.” The
priest remains in ministry.
- A sadistic priest enjoyed having children play
the roles of Jesus and other biblical characters
in parish Passion plays. He made them disrobe and
whip each other until they had cuts, bruises and
welts.
- A priest falsely told a 12-year-old boy his mother
knew of the assaults and consented to the rape
of her son.
The grand jury found that many victims
were abused for years and that many priests abused
multiple victims, sometimes preying on members of
the same family. Father Albert T. Kostelnick had
18 victims. Father James J. Brzyski, whose conduct
the report described as a “criminal rampage,” abused
17 victims, many of them from a single parish. Father
Nicholas V. Cudemo abused 16 victims and was allowed
to stay in his pastoral role for decades after the
first abuse report in 1966.
And how did the archdiocese respond
to the grand jury’s painstakingly documented
report? In a truly disgusting
display of perverted self-interest and bunker mentality,
they claimed to be victims. Even
more disgusting is that no criminal charges can be
filed against the priests or against “Prince
of the Church” Bevilacqua, despite the
evidence presented in the grand jury’s report:
After reviewing thousands
of documents from Archdiocese files and hearing...from
over a hundred witnesses, we, the Grand Jurors, were
taken aback by the extent of sexual exploitation
within the Philadelphia Archdiocese...
For any who might want to
believe that the abuse problem in the Philadelphia
area was limited in scope, this Report will disabuse
them of that impression. The Jurors heard from some
victims who were sexually abused once or twice, and
from many more who were abused week after week for
years...Indeed, the evidence arising from the Philadelphia
Archdiocese reveals criminality against minors on
a widespread scale—sparing no geographic sector,
no income level, no ethnic group. We heard testimony
about priests molesting and raping children in rectory
bedrooms, in church sacristies, in parked cars, in
swimming pools, at St. Charles Borromeo Seminary,
at the priests’ vacation houses in the Poconos
and the Jersey shore, in the children’s schools
and even in their own homes...
Cardinal Bevilacqua, Cardinal
Krol and their top aides all abdicated their duty
to protect children. They concealed priests’ sexual
abuses instead of exposing them...
There is no doubt that the
cardinals and their top aides knew that Philadelphia
priests were abusing children. There is no doubt
that these officials engaged in a continuous, concerted
campaign of cover-up over the priests’ sexual
offenses...
Sexually abusive priests were
either left quietly in place or ‘recycled’ to
unsuspecting new parishes—vastly expanding
the number of children who were abused...
Documents clearly established
that Cardinal Bevilacqua knew that the priests had
admitted abusing minors. They also established that
he alone was responsible for subsequently placing
or leaving the priests in parishes where they would
present a severe danger to children...
Cardinal Bevilacqua had a
strict policy, according to his aides, that forbid
informing parishioners...The Cardinal, in fact, encouraged
that parishioners be misinformed...
Cardinal Bevilacqua was trained
as an attorney...The Grand Jurors find that in his
handling of priests’ sexual abuse, Cardinal
Bevilacqua was motivated by an intent to keep the
record clear of evidence that would implicate him
or the Archdiocese. To this end, he continued many
of the practices of his predecessor, Cardinal Krol,
aimed at avoiding scandal, while also introducing
policies that reflected a growing awareness that
dioceses and bishops might be held legally responsible
for their negligent and knowing actions that abetted
known predators...
To protect themselves from
negative publicity or expensive lawsuits—while
keeping abusive priests active—the cardinals
and their aides hid the priests’ crimes from
parishioners, police and the general public.
Archdiocese officials at the
highest levels received reports of abuse...They chose
not to conduct any meaningful investigation...They
left dangerous priests in place or transferred them
to different parishes as a means of concealment...They
never alerted parents of the dangers poses by these
offenders...They intimidated and retaliated against
victims and witnesses...They manipulated "treatment" efforts
in order to create a false impression of action...They
did many of these things in a conscious effort to
simply to avoid civil liability.
Moreover, while treating
abusers gently, with good wishes and promotions (Bevilacqua
included one molester, the Rev. Albert Kostelnick
[who had the greatest number of victims], at a 1997
luncheon honoring priests, and promoted him, even
though the church had received a constant stream
of abuse allegations against him, including an eyewitness
account from a fellow priest) the grand jury found
that the cardinal had lashed out at those within
the diocese who tried to raise an alarm. After a
seminarian came forward to report an abuser priest, “Cardinal
Bevilacqua ordered an investigation—of the
seminarian.” Bevilacqua refused to allow the
seminarian to complete his studies and forced him
to seek ordination outside the diocese.
And what did Bevilacqua have to say
when he testified before the grand jury? As the Philadelphia
Inquirer reported, “in his testimony before
the Grand Jury, Cardinal Bevilacqua
was still attempting to evade responsibility for
placing known sexual offenders in parishes where
they had easy access to hundreds of children .
. . He often suggested he might not have known all
the facts and that he delegated the handling of these
matters to his Secretary of Clergy. He repeatedly
claimed to have no memory of incidents and priests
we will never forget.”
Despite overwhelming evidence against
priests, cardinals and numerous members of the church
hierarchy, the statute of limitations has run out.
So the Catholic Church has once again gotten away
with crimes
against humanity while the depravity and cover-up
continue at the highest level.
Pope Benedict XVI’s widely publicized—and
strategically timed—plan to
purge seminaries of gays is a transparent attempt
to shift blame from
the corrupt, immoral Church to “homosexuals.” The
facts about pedophilia and homosexuality in no way
support the pope’s initiative.
The clinical separation of homosexuality
and child molesting was acknowledged by the appearance
of the words “pedophilia” and “pedophile.” From
the Oxford English Dictionary:
Pædophilia. An abnormal,
esp. sexual, love of young children.
1906 H. ELLIS Stud. Psychol.
Sex V. i. 11 Paidophilia or the love of children...may
be included under this head [sc. abnormality]. 1926
Med. Jrnl. & Rec. CXXIV. 161/1 One must keep
clearly in mind in dealing with pedophilia the distinction
between that mediating homosexuality, and the much
more pure perversion which is our subject...Hence
pædophiliac, -philic adjs., pertaining to or
characterized by pædophilia; also as n., a
pædophilic person.
1927 Psychoanal. Review XIV.
191 It is only in rare cases that one encounters
an individual who has pedophilic predilections and
at the same time is suffering from venereal disease.
Ibid., Krafft-Ebing...in his attempt at psychological
explanation falls back on ‘a morbid disposition
only’ on the part of the pedophalic [sic] as
the motivating factor.
1960 Spectator 8 July 69 The...survey
. . . shows the paedophiliac to be a type altogether
distinct from the adult-seeking homosexual...
1976 Publishers Weekly 26
Apr. 52/1 He contacted fellow pedophiliacs and through
them was able to sample many kinds of young girls.
Kathryn Conroy is assistant dean of
Columbia University’s School of Social Work.
She recently pointed
out in The New York Times, "What is forgotten
in all of the hysteria about priest sexual abuse
is that pedophilia is about a sexual attraction to
children (most often, regardless of their sex) and
about access." Dr. Conroy also made the most
pertinent point in relation to the pope’s ruse:
Reliable studies show that
pedophiles (those adults who sexually abuse children)
are overwhelmingly heterosexual. In fact, homosexuals
are statistically underrepresented as those who sexually
abuse children...
Further, women have far lower
rates of sexually abusing children than men do. So
if the church were really serious about protecting
children from sexual abuse by priests, gays would
not be excluded from the priesthood and ordination
would be extended to women.
Aside from ordering an “Apostolic
Visitation,” the revered Pope John Paul II
did virtually nothing about the church’s sex
scandal or its predator priests. Given the nature
of the Vatican and the plethora of mass-media reports,
John Paul II had to know about the massive immoral
cover-up carried out by his underlings. Joseph Ratzinger
was an ideological clone of John Paul and one of
the most politically conservative cardinals. His
nickname was “God’s Rottweiler” and “the
Enforcer.” He’s now Pope
Benedict XVI. Like Cardinal Bevilacqua and his
predecessor Cardinal Krol, Benedict XVI isn’t
interested in protecting children from predator priests
or acknowledging the corruption rampant in the church’s
hierarchy. The Vatican is interested solely in protecting
itself, its power, and its political campaign against
gay and lesbian people |
WASHINGTON - Tom DeLay, a powerful
political ally of President George W. Bush, stepped
down as head of the Republican majority in the House
of Representatives after being indicted on a campaign
finance charge.
DeLay vowed he was only stepping aside temporarily,
and said the case by a Texas prosecutor was part
of a "partisan vendetta". But the indictment
came as a political bombshell in Congress as the
President George W. Bush struggles to push his
legislative agenda.
A Texas grand jury charged DeLay and two political
associates of converting 190,000 dollars in corporate
money into individual campaign contributions to avoid
campaign finance restrictions.
The Washington power broker could be jailed for
between six months and two years and face a 10,000
dollar fine if found guilty. He had to step down
as the majority leader under congressional rules.
"I have notified the speaker that I will temporarily
step aside from my position," DeLay said in
a statement. House Republicans named Roy Blunt of
Missouri as the new leader. He will share the job
with Congressman David Dreier of California.
Senior Republican colleagues rallied around DeLay.
"We stand firmly behind Tom DeLay and ask
that he be afforded the same rights as every other
American -- that is innocent until proven otherwise," said
House Speaker Dennis Hastert.
The DeLay case has been investigated since an election
in Texas in November 2002 by Ronnie Earle, district
attorney for Travis County.
Without going into details on the case, Earle told
a press conference in Texas, "Our job is to
prosecute abuses of power. Our job is to bring those
abuses to the attention of the public through juries."
DeLay, widely considered one of the most powerful
political operators in Washington, has faced a series
of ethics allegations.
The 58-year-old former pest exterminator, who comes
from Sugarland, Texas, is known as "The Hammer" for
his sometimes ruthless approach to politics.
He has masterminded Republican
election victories as well as pushing through White
House goals in Congress. DeLay was also instrumental
in Republicans taking control of the Texas legislature
from the Democrats.
DeLay seemed relaxed as he vigorously condemned
the prosecutor at a press conference in the Capitol
building.
"This morning in an act of blatant political
partisanship, a rogue district attorney in Travis
County, Texas, named Ronnie Earle, charged me with
one count of criminal conspiracy, a reckless charge,
wholly unsupported by the facts.
"This is one of the weakest, most baseless
indictments in American history. It's a sham, and
Mr Earle knows it."
White House spokesman Scott McClellan declined
to comment on the charge, but praised DeLay as a
loyal Republican.
"Congressman Delay is a good ally, a leader
who we have worked closely with to get things done
for the American people," said McClellan.
The Democratic leader in the House, Nancy Pelosi,
who has long pressed for an ethics investigation
of DeLay, hailed the prosecutor's move.
"The criminal indictment of Majority Leader
Tom Delay is the latest example that Republicans
in Congress are plagued by a culture of corruption
at the expense of the American people," she
said in a statement.
Among the companies named in the indictment as having
been contributors to DeLay in Texas were Bacardi
USA, the drinks-maker, and former retail chain Sears
Roebuck and Co.
The two co-conspirators were named as John Colyandro
and Jim Ellis who have faced other charges from Earle.
Earlier this month prosecuted DeLay's defunct political
action committee, Texans for a Republican Majority
(TRMPAC), on two charges of illegally using corporate
money to help state candidates.
Last year, three close associates
of DeLay were indicted: TRMPAC director Colyandro,
fundraiser Warren RoBold and Ellis, head of DeLay's
leadership committee.
Last month, Jack Abramoff, a high-power
lobbyist with close ties to DeLay was indicted by
a grand jury on six charges stemming from an alleged
fraudulent real estate deal.
He also is accused of arranging several golf trips
paid for with tainted money for DeLay, including
a controversial trip to Scotland.
The Republican party has faced
mounting political sleaze charges in recent months.
Bill Frist, the leader of the Republican
majority in the Senate, acknowledged last week that
he has been questioned by federal investigators over
possible insider trading involving shares in a health
fund started by his family.
Frist has also strongly denied any wrongdoing. |
Retail sales
hit 22-year low. Growth at 12-year low. Inflation
at nine-year high. Unemployment rising
Gordon Brown has suffered a body blow to his political
reputation - just days after his confident speech
to Labour conference - with the release of official
figures showing the economy at its weakest level
for 12 years.
Economic output showed an annual growth rate of
1.5 per cent during the summer, the lowest since
the first quarter of 1993 when Britain, under John
Major's Tory government, was emerging from recession.
[...] |
CARACAS, Sept. 28 (Xinhuanet)
-- Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on Wednesday
condemned a US court ruling that the Cuban-born exile
Luis Posada Carriles wanted in a 1976 airliner bombing
might not be extradited to Caracas.
Chavez said Posada is
a terrorist, and the case could harm ties with
the United States if the anti-Castro militant is
not extradited to Venezuela.
"Now the US government
has taken a decision in favor of Posada ...that's
what I call imperialistic cynicism," said Chavez.
"The US troops are
torturing people in Guantanamo Bay. they are killing,
assassinating and bombing people," the Venezuelan
president said.
At a hearing in the US city
of El Paso, Texas, on Monday, judge William Abbott
postponed the handover of Posada, a Venezuelan citizen,
to the South American country on the ground of the
International Covenant for the Protection Against
Torture.
Posada, an alleged Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) agent, was arrested in
May for illegally entering the United States. The
77-year-old exile escaped from a Venezuelan prison
in 1985, while he awaited retrial of the bombing
of a Cuban passenger plane, which killed all 73 people
on board in 1976.
Posada has denied he was
the mastermind behind the 1976 bombing, and expressed
his satisfaction over the US ruling on Tuesday, which
he said could turn down the extradition request filed
by Venezuela on June 15.
The Venezuelan Embassy in
Washington said the decision of judge Abbott showed
the double standard of US President George W. Bush
in the so-called war on terror.
Caracas insisted that the
United States be still bound by international law
to deport Posada, the embassy said in statement. |
An Algerian Islamist organisation,
the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC),
has issued a call for action against France which
it describes as "enemy number one", intelligence
officials said Tuesday.
"The only way to teach France to behave is
jihad and the Islamic martyr," the group's
leader Abu Mossab Abdelwadoud, also own as Abdelmalek
Dourkdal, was quoted as saying in an Internet message
earlier this month.
"France is our enemy number one, the enemy
of our religion, the enemy of our community," he
was quoted as saying.
France was mentioned 15 times in the text, and the
Algerian government was also targeted, the officials
said.
Nine people detained in a series of raids west of
Paris Monday are suspected members of the GSPC, officials
have said. They were being questioned for a second
day Tuesday at the headquarters of the DST domestic
intelligence agency.
Interior minister Nicolas Sarkozy said Monday that
the risk of terrorist attack in France is "at
a very high level... There are cells operating on
our territory."
The GSPC was created from a split in the Armed Islamic
Group (GIA), the main force in Algeria's long insurgency
which was also responsible for a series of bombings
in France in 1995. |
LOS ANGELES (AP) - Wind-driven
brush fires scorched nearly 2,500 acres north of
Los Angeles on Wednesday, killing thousands of chickens
at a farm while destroying at least one home and
threatening others.
A mandatory evacuation was ordered in Box Canyon
and a freeway was closed as the blaze hopscotched
the roadway and burned at the west end of the San
Fernando Valley.
Los Angeles County Fire Department spokesman Ron
Haralson said more than 700 firefighters were on
the scene. One firefighter was struck on the head
by a 40-pound boulder and was taken to a hospital
for treatment, Capt. Carlos Calvillo said.
The fire had burned over 1,200 acres and was 5 percent
contained by evening, Haralson said.
A blaze in Riverside County spread over 1,300 acres
between the cities of Redlands and Moreno Valley,
about 70 miles east of Los Angeles.
That fire destroyed three chicken coops at a ranch
believed to have housed 70,000 to 90,000 chickens,
said Riverside County Fire Department spokeswoman
Cheri Patterson. Thousands of chickens died.
"It's a vast amount,'' Patterson said. |
MOSCOW -- An earthquake measuring
6.5 points on the Richter scale struck the Kuril
Islands in the Far East of Russia on Thursday, but
there were no immediate reports of casualties and
damage, the Interfax news agency said.
The earthquake occurred 175 km southeast of the
town of Severo-Kurilsk on the Kuril Islands at
around 1:17 p.m. Moscow time (0917GMT) on Thursday,
Viktor Beltsov from the press service of the Russian
Emergency Situations Ministry was quoted as saying.
According to Beltsov, the earthquake wave in Severo-Kurilsk
reached four points on the Richter scale. No casualties
or damage have been reported yet.
Meanwhile, the Russian ministry
predicted a major earthquake inthe Far Eastern peninsula
of Kamchatka for the end of this year. |
Coverage is
20% below average for time of year · Destructive
cycle could affect Earth's weather
Global warming in the Arctic could be soaring
out of control, scientists warned yesterday as
new figures revealed that melting of sea ice in
the region has accelerated to record levels.
Experts at the US National Snow and Data Centre
in Colorado fear the region is locked into a destructive
cycle with warmer air melting more ice, which in
turn warms the air further. Satellite pictures show
that the extent of Arctic sea ice this month dipped
some 20% below the long term average for September
- melting an extra 500,000 square miles, or an area
twice the size of Texas. If current trends continue,
the summertime Arctic Ocean will be completely ice-free
well before the end of this century.
Ted Scambos, lead scientist at the Colorado centre,
said melting sea ice accelerates warming because
dark-coloured water absorbs heat from the sun that
was previously reflected back into space by white
ice. "Feedbacks in the system are starting to
take hold. We could see changes in Arctic ice happening
much sooner than we thought and that is important
because without the ice cover
over the Arctic Ocean we have to expect big changes
in Earth's weather." [...] |
It's been a busy year for Mount
St. Helens.
After snapping back to life with a series of earthquakes
that started last September, the volcano has been
a veritable lava assembly line, churning out a
dump-truck load every second. The
new dome inside the crater is growing up to 16
feet a day, shoving aside a 700-foot-thick
glacier as if it were papier-mâché.
And there's no end in sight, say U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS) scientists.
"There's no reason to think it couldn't go
on for another year, for decades," said volcanologist
Dan Dzurisin.
Scientists have been busy, too.
Since the eruption began, monitoring St. Helens
has been an all-consuming job for experts at the
USGS Cascades Volcano Observatory in Vancouver, Wash.,
said Cynthia Gardner, scientist in charge. Other
projects have been shelved and $1 million devoted
to the effort, not counting salaries.
That work is paying off with a richer picture of
the region's most volatile volcano.
"It's been an exciting time, and we've learned
a lot," Dzurisin said.
By analyzing the million small earthquakes that
have rattled the volcano over the past year, scientists
are beginning to construct a picture of the magma
chamber 2.5 miles below the surface where the lava
originates. Chemical analysis of the new dome suggests
it takes about a week for molten rock to travel from
the chamber to the surface.
For most of that trip, the rock remains fluid, Dzurisin
said. About a half mile before emerging, it hardens
up. As it thrusts out of the ground, the new rock
forms whaleback ridges that climb, then crumble.
At its highest elevation, the top of the new dome
stood 7,765 feet above sea level. It's lower now,
but the volume has grown to 76 million cubic yards
- 25 times the size of Safeco Field.
The magma itself is coming primarily from a pool
that's been around since the volcano's spectacular
eruption in 1980 and the series of smaller lava flows
that followed, said geologist John Pallister. That's
good news, he said, because it means the likelihood
of another massive explosion is slight.
But a group of experts who examined
the new lava rocks this summer found a bit of fresh
magma mixed in, which may indicate the eruption is
starting to tap into a deeper reservoir. If fresher,
more explosive magma starts to move through the system,
the chance of a big blow will increase, Pallister
said.
The earthquake analysis also has yielded the first
tangible evidence of a crack in the Earth's crust
that extends for miles beneath the volcano. Scientists
have long known it must be there - a weak spot in
the crust that provides a pathway for molten rock,
Dzurisin said.
"The volcano is there because magma has been
rising through that zone of weakness for tens of
thousands of years."
Scientists have been surprised at the eruption's
persistence. Usually, such prolific lava outflows
come in fits and starts. After
the 1980 explosion left a hollowed crater, the volcano
rebuilt a dome with multiple eruptions over the course
of six years. In a single year, the current eruption
has produced a dome nearly as big.
The current eruption came on with very little warning,
which also was unexpected, Dzurisin said. The first
earthquake swarm hit on Sept. 23, 2004. The first
steam explosion was Oct. 1, and by Oct. 11 lava pushed
through to the surface.
Could future, more destructive eruptions occur with
even less notice?
"We're confident the volcano would give us
some warning of a major change," Dzurisin said. "It
could be as short as a day. It would more likely
be a week or months."
On clear, fall days, St. Helens is likely to put
on a nice show for visitors, with a steam plume rising
high into the sky. From Johnston Ridge Observatory,
about five miles north of the crater, the view is
spectacular, Gardner said.
"Go to the volcano," she
advised. "It's a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity."
Sandi Doughton: 206-464-2491 or sdoughton@seattletimes.com
|
Washington - Vaccines are less
effective at protecting the elderly from influenza
than has been thought, and some of the drugs commonly
used to treat the flu are losing their power at a
surprisingly fast rate, according to two new studies.
The findings, published online by the Lancet medical
journal, come as the world is bracing for a possible
flu pandemic from a dangerous strain of virus spreading
among birds in Asia.
In the first study, an international collaboration
of scientists conducted a systematic review of all
studies evaluating the effectiveness of flu vaccination
for the elderly over the past 40 years. The analysis,
the most comprehensive ever conducted, found that
vaccination was only modestly effective, preventing
about 30 to 42 percent of hospitalizations.
Those living in nursing homes fared somewhat better
than those living on their own.
"The bottom line is
the effectiveness is modest, at best," said
Tom Jefferson, an epidemiologist in Rome who led
the analysis for the Cochrane Collaboration, an
independent international initiative to scientifically
evaluate the efficacy of medical care. "It's
very disappointing."
The findings are particularly disappointing because
the elderly are among those at highest risk. About
36,000 Americans die each year from the flu, many
of them elderly.
Vaccines may be less effective in the elderly because
their immune systems are less able to mount a vigorous
response, Jefferson and others said.
"People should ask whether it's worth investing
these trillions of dollars and euros in these vaccines," Jefferson
said.
Other experts said the findings underscored the
need to develop more effective approaches, but they
cautioned they should not discourage anyone from
getting vaccinated.
"We still urge the elderly
and other high-risk groups to be vaccinated," said
Dick Thompson of the World Health Organization.
Even 30 percent effectiveness prevents a lot of
suffering, said William Schaffner of Vanderbilt University.
"Vaccination is not perfect, but it still is
enormously beneficial," he said.
In the second study, Rick Bright of the US Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention and colleagues
analyzed 7,000 samples of flu virus collected around
the world for genetic mutations that indicate the
germs have developed resistance to a class of drugs
known as adamantanes, which includes the widely used
drugs amantadine and rimantadine.
The researchers found the rate of
resistance increased from 0.4 percent of the samples
in 1994 to 12.3 percent in 2004. In the United States,
the rate jumped from 1.9 percent in 2004 to 14.5
percent in the first six months of 2005, the researchers
found.
"We were alarmed to find such a dramatic increase
in drug resistance in circulating human influenza
viruses in recent years," Bright said.
Other researchers agreed, especially because this
class of drugs is less expensive than newer flu drugs
and can be used to both treat and prevent the disease.
"This level of resistance is quite alarming," said
Robert Belshe of St. Louis University School of Medicine. "This
is saying that these resistant viruses are spreading,
and that's something we have to be concerned about."
Fortunately, flu viruses, including the bird flu
circulating in Asia, remain vulnerable to two newer
drugs, Tamiflu and Relenza, which the federal government
has been stockpiling.
The WHO's Thompson said the agency was monitoring
the development of resistance.
"It's something we need to monitor to get a
better grip on," Thompson said. |
LOS ANGELES, Sept. 28
(Xinhuanet) -- Hundreds of residents were evacuated
from their homes north of Los Angeles late Wednesday
as brush fires driven by strong winds swept the hillsides
in the Southern California county, officials said.
About 700 firefighters
stayed on the job throug
h the night trying to control the blaze which began
along the Ronald Reagan Freeway in Chatsworth,
about 50 km northwest of Los Angeles, officials
said.
"It's still warm and
the winds are still blowing and we still have fires," said
Inspector Ron Haralson.
The fire burned some 3,500
acres, and only about 5 percent of the fire was contained
as of 10 p.m., according to the Los AngelesCounty
Fire Department. |
A cluster of earthquakes south
of Cascade has been shaking items off shelves and
jolting residents out of their sleep this week.
"The dog starts barking every single time," said
Armen Mannschreck, a high school English teacher
who lives near Clear Creek. A temblor Tuesday night — the
strongest so far — sent a bowl crashing to
the floor from a dresser in Mannschreck's house.
It also set the cabinet doors swinging at the home
of Linda Jarvis, another Clear Creek resident who
is regularly awakened by middle-of-the-night quakes
these days. Jarvis said she's often felt tremors
in the 19 years she's lived at her home — but
only in the last week have they been strong enough
to get her up in the night.
"The cat wakes up; my cabinet doors in the
kitchen go open and closed and I have mortar coming
out of the brick on my fireplace outside," Jarvis
said.
Residents of the Clear Creek area, about 10 miles
south and southeast of Cascade, have been calling
seismologists to report feeling several earthquakes
a day, said Idaho Geological Survey geologist Bill
Phillips. IGS instruments have been recording from
50 to 100 earthquakes per day around Clear Creek
in the last week.
Earthquake clusters — or swarms, as seismologists
describe them — are common in Idaho. The last
one was in Donnelly in 2001, said Jim Zollweg, a
seismologist at Boise State University. There have
been several other swarms in the last few decades.
The swarm in the Clear Creek area, which started
around Sept. 22, is unusual in that residents are
feeling the earthquakes, the largest of which, Tuesday
night, had a magnitude of about 3.7. Usually an earthquake
measuring 3.7 isn't felt and causes no damage at
all — only at about 4.7 magnitude do people
notice the shaking, or do earthquakes crack plaster
or leave other signs, Zollweg said.
He thinks the Clear Creek temblors might be closer
to the surface — only one to two miles underground,
instead of the more common three to seven miles below.
That would make them easier to feel, he said.
"The swarm is a little unusual, but we don't
know that it's unusual enough for people to be worried," said
Zollweg, who has been deflecting a lot of requests
for predictions on how big, and how frequent, the
earthquakes might get. He's willing to speculate
that the swarm will go on for weeks or months — but
he can't say how strong future earthquakes might
be. There is a fault in the earth near the Clear
Creek area, but it's not clear if the swarm at Clear
Creek is related to that fault or to any other, he
said.
"I'm kind of thinking there is some potential
for a somewhat larger quake," Zollweg said. "What
that means is really hard to say. I'm not comfortable
thinking we've seen the biggest one yet, but if history
is any guide, it's not going to get much bigger."
That's comforting news to Jarvis.
"It's unnerving, and it's scary while it's
going on," she said. "But I don't worry
about dying. I'm not ready to move."
Earthquakes, many detected only by instruments,
are common in Idaho. The Idaho Geological Survey
at the University of Idaho in Moscow said the state
is ranked fifth in the nation on a scale of earthquake
risk. The risk is greater only in California, Nevada,
Utah and Alaska.
Idaho felt two large earthquakes in recent memory;
both caused deaths and millions of dollars in damage.
One was the 1959 Hebgen Lake earthquake in Montana,
with a magnitude of 7.1; the other was the 1983 Borah
Peak earthquake, with a magnitude of 7.
Sean Christian, an eighth grader at Cascade High
School, was woken up by a temblor that shook his
Clear Creek home Tuesday night.
"It was a big shaking and it almost knocked
my dad's guns out of his gun cabinet," said
Christian, who is 13. He said he used to be scared,
but he's used to earthquakes now.
"I just go back to sleep," Christian said. |
Hundreds of people remain out of their homes
in the Stephenville, Newfoundland area. A state
of emergency was declared Tuesday because of extensive
flooding. Heavy rains caused two rivers to spill
over their banks, forcing hundreds of people to
flee their homes.
About 140-millimetres of rain had fallen by late
Tuesday afternoon.
Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams
toured the flooded area yesterday. He said Prime
Minister Paul Martin has extended an offer of federal
assistance to the province.
Officials began a door-to-door evacuation of low-lying
areas at 7:30 a.m. Tuesday as the flooding began.
About 200 homes were flooded, some with water up
to the windows, and several dozen vehicles were submerged.
The province and the Canadian Red Cross have set
up a reception centre in the provincial armoury.
Although the three bridges in Stephenville are intact,
the roadways leading to the bridges have washed away
|
On the fourth
anniversary of the September 11th attacks, Laura Knight-Jadczyk
announces the availability of her latest book:
In the years since the 9/11 attacks, dozens of books
have sought to explore the truth behind the official
version of events that day - yet to date, none of
these publications has provided a satisfactory answer
as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately
responsible for carrying them out.
Taking a broad, millennia-long perspective, Laura
Knight-Jadczyk's 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth uncovers the true nature of
the ruling elite on our planet and presents new and
ground-breaking insights into just how the 9/11 attacks
played out.
9/11: The Ultimate
Truth makes a strong case for the idea that September
11, 2001 marked the moment when our planet entered
the final phase of a diabolical plan that has been
many, many years in the making. It is a plan developed
and nurtured by successive generations of ruthless
individuals who relentlessly exploit the negative
aspects of basic human nature to entrap humanity as
a whole in endless wars and suffering in order to
keep us confused and distracted to the reality of
the man behind the curtain.
Drawing on historical and genealogical sources, Knight-Jadczyk
eloquently links the 9/11 event to the modern-day
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. She also cites the clear
evidence that our planet undergoes periodic natural
cataclysms, a cycle that has arguably brought humanity
to the brink of destruction in the present day.
For its no nonsense style in cutting to the core
of the issue and its sheer audacity in refusing to
be swayed or distracted by the morass of disinformation
that has been employed by the Powers that Be to cover
their tracks, 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth can rightly claim to be THE
definitive book on 9/11 - and what that fateful day's
true implications are for the future of mankind.
Published by Red Pill Press
Scheduled for release on October 1,
2005, readers can pre-order the book today at our bookstore. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|