As many of you know,
Signs of the Times is not supported by major funding like
many other news sites, and is not affiliated with any
government, political group, corporation, or news agency.
SOTT is financed by any donations we receive as well as
money out of our own pockets. The benefit of this setup
is that we do not have any sponsors that might introduce
unwanted bias into our work. The
obvious and major drawback is that we do not have the
funding to do all the things we would like to do for our
readers.
Almost one year ago, SOTT created the P3nt4gon Str!ke presentation, which has now been viewed by
well over 300,000,000 people worldwide, and is available
in nine different languages. Recently, we wrote and produced
the song You
Lied, performed by Away
With the Fairys. We also recorded our first ever podcast,
beginning a project which we had been trying to get off
the ground for over a year.
A
SOTT editor poses next to his computer
To produce the Signs page, we work very long days (often
upwards of 14-16 hours) without pay. We do it because
we love it, and because our readers often write to tell
us how they have benefited from our work. In order to
continue expanding our work and deepen our analysis and
understanding of our world, we need to enlarge our library.
There are many books we would like to have that we cannot
afford. With our increasing use of sound files and our
future projects that include video, we have and will continue
to incur higher bandwidth costs. As well, the Signs page
and related projects are created on several computers
which are each upwards of five years old. They are very
slow, increasingly unreliable, and won't support regular
podcasts and videos.
Unfortunately, we do not have the financial means to
purchase the books we need, much less new equipment. Current
donations only support our basic needs and living expenses.
In order to continue producing the Signs page, the podcast,
Flash presentations, and expand our operations further,
we need your support.
At the moment, we are preparing six Signs of the
Times Commentary books. These books are collections
of SOTT commentary grouped according to theme. They will
be available for sale soon, and any proceeds will go towards
helping to cover our increasing operating costs.
Our target, based on estimated costs for all the necessary
materials, upgrades, and operating costs for the coming
year is 28,000 euros.
--
Here's How You Can Help Signs of the Times --
Any donation you
can make will help us to continue to produce and improve
the Signs page.
If you donate 50 euros
(approximately US$60; click
here for current exchange rate), you will be a Bronze
Supporter.
Bronze
Supporters will receive a complementary
copy of the 911 Conspiracy Signs
Commentary book.
If you donate 100
euros, you will be a Silver
Supporter.
Silver
Supporters will receive a complementary copy
of 911 Conspiracy, US Freedom, and The
Media.
Donations
of 175 euros will qualify you as a Gold
Supporter.
Gold
Supporters will receive the entire set of
six commentary books: 911 Conspiracy, The
Human Condition, The Media, Religion,
US Freedom, and The Work.
Donations of 250 euros will
qualify you as a Platinum Supporter.
Platinum
Supporters will receive the entire set of
six commentary books: 911 Conspiracy, The
Human Condition, The Media, Religion,
US Freedom, and The Work. In addition,
they will receive one other book of their choice free
from our bookstore.
We have more projects like our podcast in
the works - but we need your
help to make them a reality!
Thank
you in advance from the editors and the rest of the team
at Signs of the Times!
LONDON - Police are urgently hunting
for four presumed would-be suicide attackers after a
virtually identical repeat of the July 7 London bombings
only avoided fresh carnage when the explosives apparently
failed to detonate fully.
The swift succession of events on Thursday lunchtime,
when bombers targeted three Underground subway trains
and a double-decker bus, was a chilling echo of the
July 7 attacks except that those happened in the morning
rush hour.
Unlike the devastation of a fortnight
before, when 56 people died and more than 700 were injured,
Thursday's repeat attacks caused no casualties as the
rucksack-borne bombs seemingly failed to detonate fully.
Witnesses reported hearing loud pops like guns or corks
as smoke poured from the rucksacks, testimony which
experts said indicated that the bombs' detonators went
off but failed to ignite the main charges.
Comment: Four
rucksack bombs, and they all failed to detonate??
Isn't that just a bit too lucky?
"Clearly the intention must have been to kill.
You don't do this with any other intention," the
head of London's Metropolitan Police, Ian Blair, said
on Thursday.
Commuters warily returned to the Underground network,
although the three stations involved in Thursday's incidents
remained closed -- along with those stricken by the
July 7 blasts.
Officers refused to give details of their investigation,
but the evidence from witnesses strongly indicated that
the latest attacks, like those of July 7, were planned
as suicide attacks.
One London businessman recounted coming
face to face with a dazed man lying on the floor on
top of his smoking rucksack, seemingly in a state of
shock at still being alive.
Abisha Moyo told the Daily Mail newspaper that he was
on a subway train near Shepherd's Bush station in west
London, the site of the first reported near-simultaneous
train blasts, when he was startled by a loud bang.
He saw a young, smartly-dressed man lying face up on
top of a rucksack.
"He had his eyes shut and there was a puff of
smoke coming from the bag," Moyo said, recounting
how the man eventually regained
his senses and fled from the train.
At almost exactly the same time, passengers
on trains at two other stations, Oval to the south and
Warren Street in the centre, reported similar incidents.
Ivan McCracken, on the train at Warren Street, said
fellow passengers described seeing a man carrying a
rucksack which exploded.
"It was a minor explosion but enough to blow open
the rucksack. The man then made an exclamation as if
something had gone wrong. At that point everyone rushed
from the carriage."
A similar event at Oval station sparked
a dramatic chase during which the young presumed bomber
wriggled free from pursuers on the platform before being
tackled by a florist just outside the station but escaping
again.
About an hour later, the driver of
a Number 26 bus driving through Shoreditch, just east
of the centre, reported hearing a loud bang on the top
deck of the vehicle followed by a pall of smoke.
Fearing the worst -- 14 peopled died when a Number
30 bus was blown up on July 7 -- driver Mark Maybanks
ventured to the top deck and found a small black rucksack,
which he presumed was the bomb.
"I've never been so frightened as when I went
up the stairs. After what happened earlier this month
I didn't know what I would find," he was quoted
as saying by the Sun newspaper.
According to a series of newspaper reports, police
have recovered all four rucksack bombs, giving them
a potentially huge boost in tracking down the perpetrators,
as well perhaps as those who helped the four British
Muslim suicide bombers who died in the July 7 attacks.
Officers refused to discuss the evidence, but police
commissioner Blair said he felt "very positive"
that the clues could give vital pointers.
"We do believe that this may represent
a significant breakthrough in the sense that there is
obviously forensic material at these scenes which may
be very helpful to us," he said.
Comment: Again,
what a stroke of luck!
Magnus Ranstorp, director of the Centre for the Study
of Terrorism and Political Violence at the University
of Saint Andrews in Scotland, said the bombs may have
been a "bad batch" or badly wired.
"I think there could be the possibility that the
material was degraded or they did not wire it correctly,"
he told AFP.
Prime Minister Tony Blair urged Londoners
on Thursday to repeat their much-praised attitude of
July 7 and carry on as normal.
The attackers were trying to "intimidate people
and to scare them and to frighten them to stop them
going about their normal business," he said after
talks with Australian Prime Minister John Howard at
Downing Street.
Comment:Yesterday,
London mayor Ken Livingstone was asked what he thought
motivated the 7/7 bombers. He responded:
"A lot of young people see
the double standards, they see what happens in (U.S.
detention camp) Guantanamo Bay, and they just think
that there isn't a just foreign policy," he said.
People in high places had begun
to question the lies of men like Bush and Blair, and
that obviously could not be allowed to continue. It
is highly likely that there will no longer be much debate
over the new draconian "anti-terror" laws
that are in the works in Britain.
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex
Jones/
Prison Planet
July 21 2005
Today is the last
day of parliament before an 80 day break. So if
the government wanted to get those anti-terror measures
through which were proposed after the 7/7 bombing, then
this status of high alert is the perfect climate to
get them rammed through without dissent.
Sky News reported that members of
parliament could be recalled tonight in a special session
for the express purpose of passing that legislation.
And what does the legislation include? Designating
anyone who writes articles or puts out a website that
advocates or gives aid and comfort to the terrorists.
So you have a situation whereby they could say that
someone like myself writing articles accusing the government
of involvement, has a negative impact on the public's
trust of the government in fighting the war on terror
and therefore aids the terrorists.
The definition is so loose that they
could classify what we do on this website as aiding
terrorists.
When of course all we're really doing is shining a
spotlight on the real terrorists and attempting to save
both lives and liberties.
The government is setting up a database
of undersirables to be watched under this legislation.
In the early confusion about what is actually happening
in London, several things are already clear.
- This immediately stalls questions
about the first bombing. The mainstream media
were finally beginning to highlight the fact that the
government's official story did not fit together. This
takes those issues off the front pages.
- This further promulgates the
fearmongering and creates a pliable public that is willing
to accept draconian anti-terror laws. They are
trying to turn us into Israel, with an alert or a bombing
every fortnight.
- On the very day that the Patriot
Act is due to be renewed, Bush can use the alert level
to grease the skids and bully Congress into re-authorizing
the bill.
Some early reports from the scene of the incidents
are very interesting.
Reports are that Arabs were seen running from the sitesof
the explosion. London's population is 20% Arab. If a
bomb exploded near you, would you run? One of the Arabs
is reported as saying "what is wrong with these
people?" which suggests he was just scared but
was immediately identified as a scapegoat.
Sky News is showing scenes of random Arabs being arrested.
Watch for the fearmongering of 'four terrorists on the
loose waiting to attack' - this will enable emergency
stop and search powers to be used. How
likely is it that all four bombs would fail to detonate?
ITN news reported that one of the suspected suicide
bombers was arrested and taken into Whitehall. Why
would somebody so potentially dangerous be taken into
a government building and not to the police station?
[...]
Comment:
A reader sent an interesting observation to our forum:
With respect to the most recent bombings
in London:
3 bombs on trains, one on a bus - just like July7...
No one is injured? The bombs fail to go off, only the
detonators do? How likely is that?
Note the targets
of the latest bombings in London:
- Shepherd's Bush Station (Bush?)
- Oval Station (Oval Office?)
- Warren Street (as in Warren Commission?)
- Hackney Road - doesn't seem to fit, except that the
blast occurred near the junction of COLUMBIA RD &
Shoreditch... (as in 'district of Columbia'?)
looks to me like somebody is trying
to send a message...and a threat.
By Mark Trevelyan
Reuters Security Correspondent
Thu Jul 21, 1:49 PM ET
LONDON - Four attempted bombings
on London's transport system on Thursday look like an
intended carbon-copy of attacks that killed 56 people
two weeks ago and may be masterminded by the same group,
security analysts said.
They put forward two main scenarios behind the latest
blasts, which were much smaller than the previous ones,
and did not cause any fatalities.
The first, more benign explanation, was that the attacks
were carried out by "imitative amateurs" intent
on mounting a copycat strike by targeting three underground
trains and a bus in a cross-formation across the city.
The second, more worrying, was that the same group
behind the suspected al Qaeda-linked attacks on July
7 had struck again, albeit with far less devastating
effect.
Police refused to be drawn on which was more likely.
"Whether or not this is directly connected, in
the sense of carried out by the same group of people,
however loosely knit that is, I think that's going to
take just a little bit longer before we can qualify
that," police chief Ian Blair said.
But he added: "Clearly, the intention must have
been to kill."
"TERRORIST PSYCHOLOGY"
Whoever was behind Thursday's attacks,
they managed to manufacture four explosive devices and
smuggle them on to the London transport network despite
the highest levels of security and public watchfulness
in London for years.
Comment: How indeed
did the "terrorists" manage to smuggle four
more bombs through the tightest security in years?
If the same group was responsible for two waves of
coordinated attacks two weeks apart, it would show an
alarming ease in mobilising fresh operatives -- perhaps
even would-be suicide bombers -- to follow the example
of the four bombers who blew themselves up on July 7.
"The more we know about the bomb
attack two weeks ago, the more skilful it looks, well
planned -- the people behind it know what they're doing,"
said Michael Clarke, security expert at King's College
London.
Comment: One might
even suspect that the recent operations were so skillfully
executed that they would require the expertise, coordination,
and resources of a major intelligence organization.
"It is entirely plausible that they will have
planned a campaign, not just one bomb. It's part of
terrorist psychology that one bomb is never enough."
Former U.S. intelligence official Robert
Ayers, a security analyst at respected London think
tank, the Chatham House institute, said he thought it
more likely the same group was behind both attacks than
that a second, independent group had now emerged.
"What I've been saying all along
is that you had four guys that died (in the July 7 bombings),
but the infrastructure that trained them, equipped them,
funded them, pointed them at the right target -- the
infrastructure's still in place."
Comment: Well,
this most recent statement from the Chatham House institute
is quite an about face. From the July
18, 2005 Signs page:
The Royal Institute of International Affairs, known
as Chatham House, concluded in a report that the war
in Iraq gave a "boost" to Al-Qaeda and made
Britain especially vulnerable to attacks -- a theory
that clashed with Blair's belief that there is no
link with the July 7 bombings.
"There is no doubt that the situation over Iraq
has imposed particular difficulties for the UK, and
for the wider coalition against terrorism," said
the London-based research centre in its study, "Riding
Pillion for Tackling Terrorism is a High-risk Policy".
"It gave a boost to the Al-Qaeda network's propaganda,
recruitment and fundraising," Chatham House said,
arguing that it also provided an ideal training area
for Al-Qaeda-linked terrorists and deflected resources
that could have gone to help bring terror mastermind
Osama bin Laden to justice. [...]
Chatham House also heavily criticised the British
government's anti-terrorism strategy, accusing it
of working shoulder-to-shoulder with the United States
as a back seat passenger rather than an equal decision
maker.
It seems these recent attacks,
as "lucky" and "amateur" as they
may be, are quickly stifling any dissent.
If the same group was involved, the
obvious question is why the first wave of attacks was
so professional and deadly and the second apparently
so amateur.
UNUSED EXPLOSIVES
Ayers noted that police had
recovered unused explosives from various sites including
a hire car abandoned by the July 7 bombers at Luton,
near London.
"One speculation I've had all along is that they
left those explosives in the car for another group to
pick up and carry out a second attack, but when they
got there the car had already been taken over by the
police, so they've had to cobble something together
fairly quickly," he said. [...]
The analysts said the impact of a second
attack, although less deadly than the first, would be
highly disruptive to life and business in Europe's biggest
financial center.
Navin Reddy, strategic risk analyst
at consultancy Merchant International Group, said "every
half-baked terrorist in the country" would be looking
at committing similar attacks.
"Given that the intelligence services will be
unable to track groups that act independently of the
major terror organizations they do watch, this raises
the risk level," he said.
"The events of today and July 7 are having a distinct
economic impact on the running of the capital. They
have disrupted the transport system and they have tied
up the emergency services.
"The longer-term trickle effect
on the nation's pyschology and missed business opportunities
could mount up," he added.
Comment: Yes,
indeedy - the attacks are all about psychology. A QFS
member sent us the following today:
It's very sad to report, but it
seems that the UK propaganda campaign is working very
effectively, from what I see around me:
1. A work colleague saw a TV program
on monday night called 'The
Real Story' which replaced
at short notice the UK's highest rated program ('Eastenders')
on the regular schedules in order to get absolutely
maximum exposure. According
to my colleague, it basically drummed home the mantra
that 'Moslem equals terrorist', but in a really
persistent, persuasive and effective way. He is an
intelligent bloke, yet he said
that if he didn't work with a 'cynic' (me) and a Moslem
(our other colleague) every day, and have the kind
of discussions that we do, he would probably have
totally gone along with the opinions expressed, and
he suspects that almost everyone will accept it.
It will probably have similar viewing figures to 'Eastenders'
that it replaced (so, about 12 million).
2. Also second hand, but worth
repeating - people have been
heard in pubs etc to express the opinions that we
should 'kill em all', again relating to moslems.
So, unfortunately it's catching
fire. Well done Mr Blair. Mission Accomplished.
If any of our other British readers
saw 'The Real Story' or have other news or information
to share, please e-mail
us or post a message on our forum.
LONDON, July 22 (Xinhuanet)
-- A group linked to the al Qaeda terrorist organization
has claimed responsibility for Thursday's bombings in
London, as forensic teams are examining the rucksack bombs
found on a bus and in underground trains.
The group named as Abu Hafs al Masri
Brigade, also claimed responsibility for the explosions
on July 7, the Sky news television reported Friday.
But the authenticity of the statement
was not verified yet.
Turki al-Faisal, Saudi Arabia ambassador to London,
was quoted by Sky news as believing that Thursday's attacks
are linked to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network.
"The modus operandi, the sheer cowardice associated
with them and the attacks on innocent civilians - these
are all part and parcel of al Qaeda," he said.
On Thursday, four explosions took place almost simultaneously
at three underground stations and a No. 26 bus in east
London. They mirrored the attacks two weeks ago, in which
more than 56 people were killed and over 700 people injured
in blasts on three underground railway trains and a bus
in London.
Three of the four devices found on
Thursday are thought to be of a similar size and weight
to the bombs used in the July 7 attacks. The fourth was
smaller and appears to have been contained in a small
plastic box.
Police said the device on the bus was in a newish-looking
black Fitness First rucksack. Officers found it in a footwell
on the topdeck of the double-deck bus. On the seat next
to the rucksack they found a Duracell battery and some
red wire.
Police received reports of people running away from
two of the attempted blast sites.
At least two people were arrested on
Thursday afternoon, including one in Downing Street, but
they were released later without charge.
Reports suggested that only the detonators on the four
devices went off. Detectives investigating the attacks
are working on the basis that the bombs were not properly
primed.
Police are appealing for witnesses to come with evidence
and statements to several locations or call anti-terrorist
hotline. They are also asking people with photos or mobile
phone images from any of the incident scenes to send them
on-line.
Comment:
Well, we all knew it was coming. The new bombings were
the work of "al-Qaeda". That fits rather nicely
with the idea that these latest bombings were also false
flag operations specifically timed to kill any doubts
about the 7/7 bombings as well as any dissent regarding
the new UK terrorism laws and the renewal of the Patriot
Act in the US. As always, who benefits?
[...] Passengers said a man, described
as South Asian, ran onto a train at Stockwell station
in south London. Witnesses said
police chased him, he tripped, and police then shot
him.
"They pushed him onto the floor
and unloaded five shots into him. He's dead," witness
Mark Whitby told the British Broadcasting Corp. "He
looked like a cornered fox. He looked petrified."
Whitby said the man didn't appear to have been carrying
anything but said he was wearing a thick coat that looked
padded. [...]
Comment: And
so the madness continues. British citizens are being
herded to a finer order of control, just like in the
US. Speaking of the Land of the Free, it seems that
as we mentioned above, the latest attacks in London
were perfectly timed to coincide with the vote to renew
the US PATRIOT Act...
WASHINGTON,
United States - The House of Representatives has voted
to renew the USA Patriot Act, the controversial package
of laws passed in the immediate aftermath of the September
11, 2001 terror attacks.
The House passed the USA Patriot and
Terrorism Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2005 by
a vote of 257-171.
President George W. Bush hailed the enhanced investigative
powers given to US law enforcement under the Patriot
Act as an indispensable tool in forestalling new acts
of terror
"I commend the House for voting to reauthorize
provisions of the Patriot Act that are set to expire
this year," said Bush.
"The Patriot Act has enhanced information sharing
between law enforcement and intelligence personnel,
updated the law to adapt to changes in technology, and
provided critical tools to investigate terrorists that
have been used for years in cases against organized
crime and drug dealers," Bush said.
The president urged the US legislature
to quickly send to the White House a final version of
the bill for his signature.
"The Patriot Act is a key part of our effort to
combat terrorism and protect the American people, and
the Congress needs to send me a bill soon that renews
the act without weakening our ability to fight terror,"
said Bush.
The Patriot Act, which was passed six weeks after the
September 11 attacks on the United States, contained
several temporary measures which required a new congressional
vote or faced expiration by December 31 of this year.
Thursday's House vote made 14 temporary
provisions of the legislation permanent and extended
two others that had been scheduled to lapse at the end
of the year.
Civil libertarians have strongly opposed the measures,
which give law enforcement officials access to educational,
financial and medical records without having to show
probable cause of a crime.
It also allows police and prosecutors to access details
of an individual's Internet activities and correspondence
without probable cause or consent, among other measures.
[...]
Similar reauthorization legislation
is to be taken up shortly by the US Senate.
President
Bush yesterday invoked the terrorist attacks in London
as a compelling reason for Congress to renew the USA
Patriot Act and for local governments to beef
up security on mass-transit systems.
"As we saw in London, the
terrorists are still active and they are still plotting
to take innocent life," Mr. Bush told law-enforcement
officers in Baltimore. "So my message to the
Congress is clear: This is no time to let our guard
down, and no time to roll back good laws."
It is difficult to know when the US republic was lost,
leaving aside the question if it ever existed at all.
The founding of the Federal Reserve Bank? Operation
Paperclip? The assassination of JFK? 9/11? Bush's infamous
"Niger" State of the Union speech? The passing
of the Patriot Act four years ago or its renewal this
year?
Each event marks a point on the vector of emerging
fascism. At no point along the line has it met any resistance
much less a wall that would change either its velocity
or direction.
The emotional shock delivered to the American people
on 9/11 marked the beginning of the end game. War, lies,
and tyranny have been the order of the day ever since,
with a brazenness we could not have imagined before
as Bush seems to flaunt his power and lack of regard
for anyone else's opinion. Think back a couple
of weeks to Bush's comments prior to the G8 conference
when he said that Blair had made a decision on Iraq
based upon what was right at the time and that he saw
no reason to tie it to Africa.
Asked if he would make a special
effort to help Mr Blair in return for his support
over Iraq, Mr Bush replied: "I really don't view
our relationship as one of quid pro quo.
"Tony Blair made decisions
on what he thought was best for keeping the peace
and winning the war on terror, as I did."
"I go to the G8 not really
trying to make [Tony Blair] look bad or good; but
I go to the G8 with an agenda that I think is best
for our country."
There was no political leader in the world that was
more submissive to the desires of the Bush Reich than
Poodle Blair, and his thanks is being humiliated in
public by his "friend". Not that we're losing
any sleep over it. If Blair is stupid enough to think
he is anything more than a useful idiot for the neocons,
he deserves his comeuppance.
Even if a great number of Americans are against Bush's
politics, even if they are appalled by the Patriot Act,
even if they want the US out of Iraq right now and were
against the invasion from the beginning, they don't
really see what is going on. If they did, they would
do something to stop it. They would recognise that having
faith "in the system" or "in the electoral
process" is a nostalgic view that does not reflect
the changes that have occurred in the US system since
Bush seized power through a Supreme Court legal coup.
On the surface, we still see three branches of government,
the Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Executive,
but this is only the appearance of things. In fact,
the system itself is undergoing a radical change, the
topic of Chris Floyd's column this week:
The United States long
ago ceased to be anything like a living, thriving republic.
But it retained the legal form of a republic, and that
counted for something: As long as the legal form still
existed, even as a gutted shell, there was hope it might
be filled again one day with substance.
But now the very legal structures of the Republic are
being dismantled. The principle of arbitrary rule by an
autocratic leader is being openly established, through
a series of unchallenged executive orders, perverse Justice
Department rulings and court decisions by sycophantic
judges who defer to power -- not law -- in their determinations.
What we are witnessing is the creation of a "commander-in-chief
state," where the form and pressure of law no longer
apply to the president and his designated agents. The
rights of individuals are no longer inalienable, nor are
their persons inviolable; all depends on the good will
of the Commander, the military autocrat.
President George W. Bush has granted himself the power
to declare anyone on earth -- including any U.S. citizen
-- an "enemy combatant," for any reason he sees
fit. He can render them up for torture, he can imprison
them for life, he can even have them killed, all without
charges, with no burden of proof, no standards of evidence,
no legislative oversight, no appeal, no judicial process
whatsoever except those that he himself deigns to construct,
with whatever limitations he cares to impose. Nor can
he ever be prosecuted for any order he issues, however
criminal; in the new American system laid out by Bush's
legal minions, the Commander is sacrosanct, beyond the
reach of any law or constitution.
This is not hyperbole. It is simply the reality of the
United States today. The principle of unrestricted presidential
power is now being codified into law and incorporated
into the institutional structures of the state, as the
web log Deep Blade Journal reports in a compendium of
recent outrages against liberty.
For example, last Friday, a panel of federal judges --
including John Roberts, nominated for the Supreme Court
this week -- upheld Bush's claim to dispose of "enemy
combatants" any way he pleases, The Washington Post
reports. In a chilling decision, the judges ruled that
the Commander's arbitrarily designated "enemies"
are nonpersons: Neither the Geneva Conventions nor American
military and domestic law apply to such garbage. Bush
is now free to subject anyone he likes to his self-concocted
"military tribunal" system, a brutal sham that
retired top U.S. military officials have denounced as
a "kangaroo court" that tyrants around the world
will cite in order to hide their oppression under U.S.
precedent.
The kowtowing court ruling ignores the fact that the
Geneva Conventions -- which lay down strict guidelines
for the handling of any person detained by military forces,
regardless of the captive's status -- have been incorporated
into the U.S. legal code, Deep Blade points out. They
cannot be abrogated by presidential fiat. And anyone who
commits a "grave breach" of the Conventions
by facilitating the killing, torture or inhuman treatment
of detainees (e.g., stripping them of all legal status
and subjecting them to rigged tribunals) is subject to
the death penalty under U.S. law.
This is why the Bush Faction labored so mightily to advance
the absurd fiction that the Geneva Conventions are somehow
voluntary -- while simultaneously promulgating the sinister
Fuhrerprinzip of unlimited presidential authority. The
fiction was a temporary sop to the crumbling legal form
of the Republic, a cynical perversion of existing law
to keep justice at bay until the Fuhrerprinzip could be
firmly established as the new foundation of the state.
It doesn't matter anymore if the president's orders
to suspend the Conventions, construct a worldwide gulag,
torture captives, spy on Americans, fabricate intelligence
and wage aggressive war are illegal under the "quaint"
strictures of the old dispensation; the courts, packed
with Bushist cadres, are now affirming the new order,
the "critical authority" of the Commander, beyond
law and morality, on the higher plane of what Bush calls
"the path of action."
This phrase -- with its remarkable Mussolinian echoes
-- was incorporated into the official "National Security
Strategy of the United States," promulgated by Bush
in September 2002. That document in turn was drawn largely
from a manifesto issued in September 2000 by a Bush Faction
group whose members included Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld,
Paul Wolfowitz and Jeb Bush. Their detailed plan envisioned
the transformation of America into a militarized state:
planting "military footprints" throughout Central
Asia and the Middle East, invading Iraq, expanding the
nuclear arsenal, massively increasing the defense budget
-- and predicating all these "revolutionary"
changes on the hopes for "a new Pearl Harbor"
that would "catalyze" the lazy American public
into supporting their militarist agenda.
This agenda is designed, the group said, to establish
"full spectrum dominance" over geopolitical
affairs, assuring control of world energy resources and
precluding the rise of "any potential global rival"
that might threaten the unchecked wealth and privilege
of the U.S. elite. The rule of law could only be a hindrance
to such a scheme, hence its replacement by the Fuhrerprinzip
and the "path of action."
There has been virtually no institutional resistance
to this open coup d'etat. It's now clear that the American
Establishment -- and a significant portion of the American
people -- have given up on the democratic experiment.
They no longer wish to govern themselves; they want to
be ruled by "strong leaders" who will "do
whatever it takes" to protect them from harm and
keep them in clover. They have sold their golden birthright
of American liberty for a mess of coward's pottage.
Comment:
And should there be anyone around in twenty, fifty, or
one hundred years, they'll be asking: "How could
it have happened? Why didn't the American people see it
coming?"
Some of them did. They're supporting it. They're asking
for the "strong leader" who will lead them down
the "path of action". Others are seeing it,
but don't believe it is as bad as people like us say it
is. It is still verboten to compare Bush to Hitler, to
compare what is happening in the US with what happened
in Germany in the thirties. It is as forbidden as it is
to question whether Israel's politics of genocide towards
the Palestinians might have something to do with Muslim
anger towards the West. Or to suggest that all of the
holes and contradictions in the official story of 9/11
suggest that it wasn't 19 Arab terrorists being directed
from a cave in Afghanistan that were able to bring down
the US Air Defense system that day, penetrate the Pentagon's
defenses, or plant the charges in the WTC that appear
to have been responsible for their collapse.
Who is profiting from these crimes?
It ain't the Arabs, that's for certain. They have been
vilified the world over. They are demonised. "Muslim
= terrorist" has been ingrained into the minds of
tens if not hundreds of million of people who have no
capacity to think for themselves.
It seems, as well, that the US isn't content to have
total control over its own population. It wants total
control over everyone. Ireland has recently signed an
agreement with the US that gives US law enforcement agencies
jurisdiction over Irish citizens:
US INVESTIGATORS,
including CIA agents, will be allowed interrogate Irish
citizens on Irish soil in total secrecy, under
an agreement signed between Ireland and the US last
week.
Suspects will also have to give testimony
and allow property to be searched and seized even
if what the suspect is accused of is not a crime in
Ireland.
Under 'instruments of agreement' signed last week by
Justice Minister Michael McDowell, Ireland and the US
pledged mutual co-operation in the investigation of
criminal activity. It is primarily designed to assist
America's so-called 'war on terror' in the wake of the
September 11 atrocities.
The deal was condemned yesterday
by the Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) as "an
appalling signal of how the rights of Irish citizens
are considered by the minister when engaging in international
relations". The ICCL said it appeared to
go far beyond even what has been agreed between EU countries.
On signing the agreement, the minister said that "the
international community must do everything it can to
combat terrorism with every means at its disposal.
"Ireland will not be found wanting,"
he added.
The treaty will give effect to agreements on Mutual
Legal Assistance and Extradition signed by the EU and
the US in June 2003. These are aimed at building on
mutual assistance and extradition arrangements.
Although the Department of Justice
insists that the arrangement merely updates existing
agreements, it goes much further. The US may
ask Irish authorities:
To track down people in Ireland.
Transfer prisoners in Irish custody to the US.
Carry out searches and seize evidence on behalf
of the US Government.
It also allows US authorities access to an Irish suspect's
confidential bank information. The
Irish authorities must keep all these activities secret
if asked to do so by the US.
The person who will request co-operation
is US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, the man who,
as White House counsel, instigated the notorious 'torture
memo' to US President George W Bush which advised how
far CIA agents could go in torturing prisoners.
The person to whom the request is sent is the Minister
for Justice.
About 20,000 immigrants, who have not been charged
with any crime, are currently in prison in the US. In
two recent US Supreme Court cases, the US Government
argued that US citizens could be imprisoned indefinitely
without charge if the president designated them as "enemy
combatants".
ICCL director Aisling Reidy said: "An extraordinary
aspect to this treaty is, despite its scope and its
potential to violate basic constitutional and human
rights, that all this happened
without debate or transparency.
"To agree to give such powers
to a government which has allowed detention of its own
citizens without access to a lawyer for over a year,
which has legitimised Guantanamo Bay and the interrogation
techniques there, without public debate, is an appalling
signal of how highly or not the rights of Irish citizens
are considered by the minister when engaging in international
relations."
The Department of Justice said it was wrong to say
the treaty happened without debate, as the agreements
update and supplement existing arrangements, and the
EU-US agreement has been scrutinised by the Oireachtas
four times since December 2002.
A spokesperson also rejected that the measures go beyond
what was agreed between EU countries.
Legislation will be required to give effect to some
elements of the Mutual Legal Assistance Instrument.
The necessary provisions will be contained in the Criminal
Justice (Mutual Assistance) Bill which Mr McDowell expects
to publish shortly.
Comment: There
is nowhere to run. There is nowhere to hide. Bush's
new brand of fascism is slowly creeping around the globe
disguised as the "war on terror". If a country's
citizens resist, they are simply stricken by "terrorist
attacks" until they cave in and willingly give
up their rights - or until their fearless leaders cave
in to the demands of Bush and the Neocon/Zionist cabal
and. In instituting this "New World Order",
fear is the weapon of choice.
Individuals who cope well with
stress after trauma usually are described as being "thick
skinned," but new research reveals the thickness
is in their brains, not in their skin.
Scientists determined that resilient people tend to
have a thick ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC),
which is near the front of the brain. Conversely, this
region tends to be thin for those who experience a lot
of anxiety.
The discovery will enable doctors to predict who is
at risk for stress-related disorders, which could lead
to better treatments and may even determine who is best
suited for certain careers and activities.
"For instance, an individual with a thin vmPFC
might wish to avoid high risk professions such as policeman,
firefighter or soldier," said Scott Rauch, co-author
of the study, which recently appeared in the Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rauch, who is associate chief of psychiatry for neuroscience
research at Massachusetts General Hospital, and his
colleagues made the determination after testing 14 healthy
volunteers.
Volunteers looked at digital photographs of furnished
rooms that contained lamps. Whenever
the lamps lit up in colors, the test subjects would
receive an electrical shock that each participant previously
rated as "highly annoying but not painful."
A monitor measured skin moisture levels, or flop sweat,
released during this fear-conditioning test.
The volunteers then underwent
a "fear extinction" process, where they saw
the same photos and lights, but received no shocks.
This shockless test was repeated while the volunteers
had an MRI brain scan.
The scan results then were compared to the skin moisture
readings, which enabled the researchers to link the
brain images to anxiety levels.
The MRIs revealed that volunteers
whose conditioned fear of the flashing lights diminished
during the fear extinction test phases each had a thick
vmPFC.
Gregory Quirk, associate professor of neuroscience
at Ponce School of Medicine in Puerto Rico, has performed
similar MRI research on rodents.
"This finding is extremely important
because it builds on data from rodents indicating that
individual variability in fear responses is correlated
with activity levels of neurons in the prefrontal cortex,"
Quirk told Discovery News.
When thick, this part of the brain appears to function
like a fear helmet that protects against stress.
"Increase
in the size, number or connections of neurons within
the ventral medial prefrontal cortex may allow this
particular brain region to have stronger inhibitory
influence on brain regions that generate the conditioned
fear responses in the first place," Rauch said.
[...]
Comment: Note
that the prefrontal cortex is that part of the brain
associated with a variety of "higher" cognitive
functions – language, abstract reasoning, problem
solving, social interactions, and planning.
One of the ideas that we stress on the Signs page is
that we can each choose to work on ourselves to root
out our programmed behaviours and automatic emotional
responses. While fear can be a very useful indicator
of danger, it can also be misused and abused by those
who wish to condition us with a certain fear response
- the fear of the "evildoer terrorist", for
example.
This article seems to support the notion that through
the use and development of higher cognitive functions,
we can actually "reprogram" ourselves
to stop reacting emotionally and start acting
based on reason and rational thought.
It isn't easy, but the alternative
is certainly less appealing.
Continuing on, yesterday also saw the move by the Chinese
to unhitch the yuan from the dollar. It was indeed a
very busy day for the Powers that Be...
BEIJING - China revalued its currency
and scrapped the yuan's decade-old peg to the dollar
in favor of a managed float against a basket of currencies,
caving in to intense pressure from trading partners
led by the United States.
The currency was fixed at 8.11 yuan to the dollar compared
to the old rate of 8.2765 yuan, effectively a two percent
revaluation, China's central bank, the People's Bank
of China, (PBOC) announced on its website.
The bank added it was scrapping the yuan peg to the
US dollar and setting the Chinese unit against a trade-weighted
basket of currencies, but did not reveal what these
currencies were. [...]
China's trade partners, which had criticized it for
undervaluing the yuan, giving its exports an unfair
trade advantage, welcomed the move Thursday, with a
White House spokesman saying the United States was "encouraged."
[...]
South Korea however said the move fell short of expectations
and will have little impact on trade while Singapore
said China's changes "will not have a major impact
on the Singapore dollar or on our exchange rate regime."
[...]
US Treasury Secretary John Snow had
warned China that if it did not move on its currency
by mid-October, the White House was prepared to name
China as a currency manipulator, a move that might have
led to trade retaliation.
Congress had threatened to pass a bill to slap a 27
percent punitive tariff on imports of textiles from
China if it failed to act. [...]
But they said the move was mostly
a symbolic gesture, timed to take the pressure off Chinese
President Hu Jintao when he makes a scheduled visit
to the United States in September.
"It's minimal, it's nothing really," BNP
Paribas economist Chen Xingdong said. "It seems
it's paving the way for (Chinese President) Hu Jintao
to visit the US and try to calm down relations."
Andy Xie, China economist at
Morgan Stanley in Hong Kong, said the revaluation will
have "almost zero" impact on trade and will
not change prices for American consumers. [...]
NEW YORK - The dollar slumped against
the yen in heavy trading on Thursday after China abandoned
its dollar peg in favor of a basket of currencies to
manage the yuan.
The yen's rise accelerated and other Asian currencies
firmed after Malaysia said it has changed the ringgit
peg to a managed float, fueling further gains in the
Japanese currency.
Traders had expected the Hong Kong Monetary Authority
and Monetary Authority of Singapore to revise their
currency regime as well. However, both said on Thursday
that they are maintaining their current foreign exchange
policy.
In late morning trade, the dollar fell 2 percent against
the yen to 110.65 yen, after declining as low as 110.18
after the Chinese foreign exchange announcement. Before
the announcement, it was trading at around 112.40. [...]
"The initial adjustment
is smaller than most people anticipated, and to that
extent it will in many ways place more pressure on China
to adjust over time, both from a political standpoint
and from an economic standpoint," said Alan Ruskin,
research director, 4Cast LTD in New York.
By TOM HAYS
The Associated Press
7/22/2005, 7:13 a.m. CT
NEW YORK - Alarmed by a new round
of mass transit attacks in London, police in New York
began random searches of bags and packages brought into
the city's vast subway system.
The inspections started on a small scale Thursday in
Manhattan and were expanded during Friday morning's
rush hour - a development welcomed by some commuters.
"I'm not against it," Ian Compton, 35, a
computer consultant, said at Grand Central Terminal
in midtown Manhattan. "I think any measures for
safety that aren't terribly intrusive are worth doing."
Officers, some with bomb-sniffing dogs, were stopping
people carrying bags as they entered subways, commuter
trains, buses and ferries at various points in the city,
police said. Anyone who refuses a search will be turned
away, and those caught carrying drugs or other contraband
could be arrested.
One man was arrested during Thursday evening rush hour
at the Brentwood Long Island Rail Road station after
police became suspicious, stopped his van and allegedly
found a machete and other weapons. Gilbert Hernandez,
34, had been convicted of possessing a pipe bomb in
1996, police said.
Friday morning, an officer was seen outside a subway
stop at Penn Station with a sign saying, "NYPD,
Backpacks and other containers subject to inspection."
Police officials said they had considered
taking the measures to thwart bombings for the past
three years. Two terrorist attacks on transit targets
in London forced their hand, said Paul Browne, the police
department's chief spokesman.
Browne called it "the first time this regimen
has been used in (New York's) transit system."
On Thursday, a cluster of officers was seen stopping
five men over a 15-minute period as they entered the
subway in Union Square at evening rush hour. In each
instance, the officers peered briefly into their bags,
then waved them through.
"If it serves a purpose, I'm OK with it,"
said one of the men, James Washington, 45, about being
stopped. [...]
National security squad collecting intelligence on controversial
cleric based at Fraser Street mosque
Amy O'Brian
Vancouver Sun
Wednesday, July 20, 2005
CANADA - A counter-terrorism team
of police and other national security experts is investigating
a radical Muslim cleric in Vancouver who has been known
to promote Islamic holy war against Jews and other non-Muslim
people.
Sheik Younus Kathrada, a cleric at the Dar al-Madinah
mosque on Fraser Street, is being investigated by the
Integrated National Security Enforcement Team, INSET,
which collects intelligence on "targets that are
a threat to national security," according to the
RCMP website.
Cpl. Tom Seaman, spokesman for the RCMP's E Division,
told The Vancouver Sun Tuesday that Kathrada's file
-- which was opened last October to investigate racist
comments he had made -- was handed over to INSET "within
the last six months."
"INSET has taken over the investigation. It's
active, it's ongoing," Seaman said.
"They're looking into the activities of the gentleman
that you're talking about."
Seaman would not confirm whether the Dar al-Madinah
mosque at 5936 Fraser Street is also being investigated
by INSET.
Kathrada enraged the Muslim and Jewish
communities last fall after it was reported he had made
anti-Semitic and racist comments during public speeches,
several of which were posted on the Internet.
The cleric referred to Jews as "the brothers of
monkeys and swine," and said that jihad -- holy
war -- was justifiable against people who don't accept
Islam.
Kathrada later released a statement saying he is "not
a violent or hateful person" and that his comments
were taken "completely out of context." [...]
CALVI, France, July
22 (AFP) - French Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy promised
Friday to step up surveillance of radical Islamic clerics
following the wave of failed bomb attacks in London.
"Everyone in France has the right to practice his
religion ... but when you look at the age of these young
suicide bombers in London you can see the influence of
radical preachers on these weak spirits. I do not intend
to tolerate it," he said on a visit to Corsica.
"We have decided that we must increase our means
for video surveillance, speed up the introduction of the
latest in telephone technology and information-processing
and launch a large-scale project for the early detection
of radicalising elements," the
minister said.
Sarkozy, who is also head of the ruling Union for a Popular
Movement (UMP) party, said the decision was taken after
he spoke to Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin and anti-terrorist
experts Thursday evening.
After the July 7 bombings in London Sarkozy said France
will expel imams who preach violence.
Comment:
What about rabbis who preach violence against the Palestinians?
Or priests who preach the crusades against the Muslims?
Let us hope Mr Sarkozy will be consistent and send them
to Israel and the Vatican.
Then, of course, the newspapers that portray Muslims
as "terrorists" should be closed and the owners
thrown out of the country as well. Perhaps those who were
responsible for the slander campaign against Alain
Ménargues could also be deported? Let's see
how many groups we can set against each other in a bid
to bring peace to the land.
By JEREMIAH MARQUEZ
Associated Press
July 22, 2005
LOS ANGELES - The Department of
Homeland Security announced Thursday that it has no
plans to enlist citizen volunteers to help patrol U.S.
borders, one day after the agency's top border enforcement
official said he was exploring such an idea.
On Wednesday, Customs and Border Protection Commissioner
Robert C. Bonner told The Associated Press that his
agency was considering the training of volunteers to
create "something akin to a Border Patrol auxiliary."
A Homeland Security spokesman issued a statement Thursday
backing off Bonner's controversial suggestion.
"There are currently no plans by the Department
of Homeland Security to use civilian volunteers to patrol
the border," spokesman Brian J. Roehrkasse said.
"That job should continue to be done by the highly
trained, professional law enforcement officials."
[...]
By BARRY SCHWEID
AP Diplomatic Writer
July 22, 2005
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration
said Thursday it opposed a House-passed bill that would
issue an ultimatum to the United Nations to reform or
lose U.S. financial support.
Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns told the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee, "We believe withholding
dues in order to achieve a wide array of specific conditions
would diminish our effectiveness."
Burns spoke in support of widespread
changes in the United Nations, including creation of
a new human rights council with a mandate to deal with
torture and other major abuses.
Comment: Except
torture and major abuses conducted by the US...
He called also for management and budget reforms, and
said Secretary-General Kofi Annan's suggestions for
changes at the U.N. devote too little attention to problems
in those areas.
The United States contributes about 22 percent of the
U.N. budget, more than $400 million this year, and about
25 percent of peacekeeping expenses, which adds more
than $1 billion to the U.S. bill this year. [...]
Burns said withholding dues would
undermine U.S. efforts to play the leading role in reforming
the United Nations. "It would represent
a tremendous setback in the reliability and credibility
of the U.N. in the world," he said.
Comment: Well,
sure! That's what John Bolton is for: he will reform
the UN according the wishes of the fuhrer.
Several other provisions of the bill
"impermissibly infringe" on
President Bush's constitutional authority to conduct
the nation's foreign affairs, he said.
The committee chairman, Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind.,
agreed that a law requiring U.S. dues to be withheld
would "tie the president's hands." [...]
The current U.N. human rights
commission must be replaced, Gingrich said, because
it has been taken over by "extremists and murders."He called the United Nations'
treatment of Israel "scandalous," describing
it as "hostility institutionalized."
Comment: We
can't have the UN using the facts to criticize Israel,
now can we?!
Since the collapse
of the Ottoman Empire at the beginning of the last century,
Western powers have followed policies that resulted in
the social and cultural devaluation of the Arab and, by
association, the Muslim Middle East.
It was the British Empire that set the Muslim/Arab world
on its course toward authoritarian, centralized rule.
Powerful governments, under kings, emirs or tribal chieftains,
were thought by the British to be easier to control than
popular movements that might have given rise to some form
of democracy.
The very idea of democracy in the Arab world was anathema
to the British and, later, the Americans; any popular
movement was seen as a potential threat to Western hegemony.
This held especially true after the discovery of oil in
the region.
The British government and its Colonial Office supported,
we might even say invented, these centralized governments
– Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States – and
often maintained them in power through a combination of
military support and financial subsidy.
In return, British and other western industrialists were
granted petroleum exploration concessions.
Throughout the period between the First and Second World
Wars, the victors – the British and French in particular
– sought to micromanage both the politics and the
resources of the Muslim/Arab world.
They ignored to a great extent the needs and the aspirations
of the general population, relying instead on the tribal
leaders, along with so-called “strongmen”
to keep any popular movements in check. This was particularly
true of Saddam Hussein in Iraq and the shah in neighbouring
Iran.
It can fairly be said that there has been a more or less
continuous “occupation” of the Arab world
and an intermittent occupation of Iran by the Western
powers throughout the past century and a half.
This “occupation” has not always been strictly
military, of course; for much of the time it has been
a kind of economic occupation. And if the word occupation
is thought to be too strong, certainly the word “domination”
is not.
There was a general feeling in the corridors of British
and American power, that Muslims in general – and
Arabs in particular – were naturally subservient
and weak. Furthermore, the Western powers came to believe
that Muslim and Arab reliance on western technology, would
keep them that way.
It was a dangerous point of view that would have disastrous
results in the long term.
Western domination of these countries robbed the indigenous
people of the ability to develop their own institutions.
It denied them the kind of freedom needed to foster the
education and training that would produce healthy independent
societies.
And it left real power in the hands of dictators and
cabals, who often used religion as a means of consolidating
power.
Ironically, the one Muslim country that avoided western
control was Turkey – which had been militarily defeated
by the West. It’s useful to note, however, that
Turkey was a nation without significant oil reserves.
As time passed and the post-World War Two generation
of young Muslims gained access to education in Europe
and North America, attitudes began to change. These young
people became aware of their own history and many of them
rejected the subservient role.
By then however, the western “occupation”
was firmly entrenched. And the centralized regimes of
the region had become fully reliant on either Europe and
the United States, or the old Soviet Empire.
The durability of the revolution in Iran was a shock
to the West and drastically altered the old balance of
power. Saddam Hussein’s clumsy attempt to break
the historic pattern by invading and reclaiming Kuwait
only deepened western contempt for Muslim and Arab leaders.
The resounding military victory by the West over Saddam
reinforced the feelings of dependence and weakness amongst
the younger generation and raised the level of anger among
them.
The entire Muslim Middle East has always believed that
the establishment of Israel was just one more example
of the West imposing its will on the region. No amount
of historical justification by the rest of us will change
that. And America’s unyielding defence of Israel
as the region’s only democracy widened the divide
between the two sides.
The difficulty of reaching a peace settlement between
Israel and the displaced Palestinian people intensified
the already unbearable strain on East-West relations.
Sporadic eruptions of terrorist activity by Palestinians
were viewed by young radicals from other Muslim nations
as heroic and even romantic examples of resistance to
the longstanding and hated western “occupation.”
The Palestinians became role models for underground rebel
movements in other countries, notably Saudi Arabia, Yemen
and Egypt.
It happened slowly…almost indiscernibly, but inexorably.
What was happening then – and continues to happen
– is what I call the “palestinization”
of the region.
One of the first to recognize the phenomenon was, ironically,
the arch demon himself: Saddam Hussein. Saddam jumped
on the martyrdom bandwagon and rewarded the families of
Palestinian suicide bombers. He sent them vast sums of
money over the years and that encouraged Palestinian extremists
to commit ever more outrageous acts against Israel.
The “palestinization” phenomenon was also
studied by a wealthy young Saudi citizen named Osama bin
Laden. He went even further than Saddam. Unlike the Iraqi
president, bin Laden used religion to buttress his strategy,
which was to take on the “occupiers” on their
own turf.
His increasingly bold terrorist adventures, which included
the embassy bombings in Africa, the USS Cole bombing and
others, eventually led the Americans to invade Iraq.
The invasion of Iraq was an unexpected gift to bin Laden.
Saddam rejected bin Laden’s religious fundamentalism
and shunned him. But an Iraq without Saddam has proved
to be unstable, perfect for bin Laden’s purposes.
It would provide fertile ground for the growth and expansion
of a new phase in the “war” against the regional
“occupation.” Moreover, it would – as
we now know – attract radicals from as far afield
as Pakistan and Indonesia.
It’s increasingly apparent that only very dramatic
changes in policy will extricate us from a situation that
is becoming intolerable. Israel has begun that process
now, with its decision to withdraw from the Gaza Strip.
The Americans and British can help it along by coming
up with a rational plan to withdraw from Iraq.
The rest of the world can help by taking a hard look
at the dangers of devaluing others; and by working to
foster respect, equality and justice for all nations.
Terrorism is more likely to be defeated by political,
rather than military means.
Comment:
While giving a basic overview of Western interference
in the Muslim world over the last one hundred years, showing
that the use of "terror" on the part of the
"Islamic terrorists" is based upon a long history
of domination by the West, Reed still believes that Islamic
"terrorism" is something without close connections
to the intelligence agencies of the West and, especially,
Israel, a country well known for its use of false flag
operations to turn public opinion against the Arabs. As
our articles and reader reports on yesterday's rather
bizarre set of bombings in London shows, the propaganda
campaign against Arabs and Muslims is succeeding.
The Israelis are no doubt tickled pink by this.
Keep in mind when reading about "Arab terrorists"
that a great many of the so-called "suicide attacks"
in Israel came at moments where they were detrimental
to the Palestinian cause, such as the day the International
Court ruled against the apartheid wall. Remember as well
that the Israeli media very often has complete profiles
of these "suicide bombers" within hours of the
attacks, as if Israeli intelligence knows more than they
are willing to admit -- for obvious reasons.
The vast number of contradictions in the official story
of 9/11 show that there is more there than Bush and his
handlers are willing to admit. Why was Bush so resolutely
opposed to having an official investigation? Why was Blair
so resolutely opposed to having an investigation of the
London bombings of July 7? Don't you think it is normal
to want to know what happened? If you were in charge,
and had nothing to do with it, wouldn't you want to know?
With the London bombings, the Patriot Act in the United
States was just renewed by the House. Now it's on to the
Senate.
Fresh
from its perceived success in Kyrgyzstan, the National
Endowment for Democracy (NED), an American non-governmental
organization, has a new mission in Nepal, where King Gyanendra
has assumed autocratic powers.
According to reports from South Asia, this was disclosed
to Nepalese politicians by US Assistant Secretary of State
for South Asia Christina Rocca during her recent visit
to Nepal. Although the entry of the Washington-based NED
is officially to help stabilize and promote democracy
in Nepal, its past record makes some in India wonder what
the consequences will be for India's turbulent northeast
and for India's relations with China.
Beijing has even more reason to concern
itself with the NED's presence in Nepal, next door to
sensitive Tibet. The NED makes no bones of its concerns
about Uighur Chinese, and is known to have earlier funded
anti-China forces in Tibet.
India is by no means wholly ill-disposed toward the NED.
In fact, the American outfit has some strong promoters
there. During the 2000 visit to India by president Bill
Clinton, a proposal was made to jointly set up an Asian
center for democracy. The Asian Center for Democratic
Governance is to be based in New Delhi, and jointly set
up by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) and the
NED.
The pointman for the new center is one Gautam Adhikari,
a former Washington correspondent of the Times of India
and a member of the NED. Work on setting up the center
has already started. When completed, according to CII
in New Delhi, the center will aim at benefiting new and
developing democracies of the region through the shared
experiences of the two largest democracies in the world.
Still, India's security and military officers are worried
by the NED's entry on the scene. It
is no secret that despite openly receiving special appropriations
from the US Congress, the NED has been accused of being
a Central Intelligence Agency front at various times in
the two decades it has been in existence. And there
is no question of the organization's clout, because King
Gyanendra had to accept its operations and agree to restore
democracy in order to restore development aid flows.
The significant aspect of the NED,
however, is its recent role in the "color-coded"
revolutions in Central Asia - in the backwaters of Russia.
Those "democratic revolutions" were designed
to help Washington and antagonize Moscow and Beijing.
It is too early to tell whether these "revolutions"
will have the necessary staying power - but what is certain
is that the NED was an active player. The arrival
of such a potent force in volatile areas like Nepal and
around unstable areas like India's northeast, is enough
to worry the Indians, and the Chinese as well.
The recent record The most notable of NED's "conquests"
in recent months took place in Kyrgyzstan. In his
March 30 article, "US Helped to Prepare the Way for
Kyrgyzstan's Uprising", New York Times correspondent
Craig S Smith pointed out that the US maintained the largest
bilateral pro-democracy program in Kyrgyzstan because
of the Freedom Support Act, passed by Congress in 1992,
to help the former Soviet republics in their economic
and democratic transitions.
Money earmarked for democracy programs in Kyrgyzstan
totaled about $12 million last year. Hundreds of thousands
more filtered into pro-democracy programs in the country
from other US government-financed institutions like the
National Endowment for Democracy, Smith added. "That
does not include the money for the Freedom House printing
press or the Kyrgyz-language service of Radio Free Europe/Radio
Liberty, a pro-democracy broadcaster," he states.
Kyrgyzstan's "Tulip" revolution - though it
seems far from being complete and has in fact shown signs
of withering under the summer sun - was orchestrated through
one of the major non-government organizations (NGOs) working
with the opposition to Askar Akayev's government, the
Coalition for Democracy and Civil Society (CDCS). CDCS
received the bulk of its funding from the National Democratic
Institute in Washington, which is financed by the US government.
Until recently, another Kyrgyz NGO, Civil Society Against
Corruption (CSAC), received funding from the NED. The
NED has extensive ties to the AFL-CIO trade union bureaucracy
that was identified during the 1960s and 1970s for its
efforts to topple governments deemed unfriendly to Washington.
The head of CSAC, Tolekan Ismailova, recently translated
a pamphlet on the "revolutionary" methods used
to bring down governments in Serbia, Georgia and Ukraine.
This pamphlet was printed on a press in Kyrgyzstan owned
by Freedom House, another American NGO. On one occasion,
the day after the power went out, the American Embassy
in Bishkek sent Freedom House two generators to keep the
anti-Akayev materials rolling off the press, Smith reported.
Why Nepal now?
Many in India point out that the NED is particularly rough
with countries that are undemocratic by nature or unfriendly
to the US. But, they add, no government, unless it is
an occupied country, can remain friendly on all occasions
and all the time.
Take for instance Akayev, the ousted
president of Kyrgyzstan. No doubt, Akayev was deeply unpopular
in Kyrgyzstan. But Akayev was once hailed by the West
as one of the few "democrats" to emerge out
of the wreckage of the Soviet Union. Subsequently, he
fell out of favor with Washington, and was later targeted
for removal. In this friend-to-foe episode, Akayev joins
the ranks of a long list of former US assets, including
such figures as Manuel Noriega of Panama, Slobodan Milosevic
of Serbia and Saddam Hussein of Iraq.
It is interesting to note that the NED's attention was
not drawn toward Nepal following King Gyanendra's unilateral
assumption of power on February 1, when he dismissed the
government and assumed control, and intensified military
action against Nepalese Maoist insurgents.
Gyanendra had been targeted for almost two years before
this. On November 21, 2003, Peter M Manikas, director
of Asia programs at the National Democratic Institute
for International Affairs, a NED affiliate, testified
before the US Congressional Human Rights Caucus, pointedly
criticizing the Nepalese king for "anti-democratic
activities".
In his testimony, Manikas noted that the political situation
in Nepal had continued to worsen. He recounted that in
May 2002 parliament was dissolved, but new elections (required
within six months of the dissolution of parliament) did
not take place because of growing Maoist violence. He
also noted that when the term of local government officials
expired the following July, no new elections were held.
Instead, over 200,000 elected local officials were replaced
by civil servants. In October 2002, the king suspended
the democratic process by appointing a "non-party"
cabinet which operated the government without any elected
representatives, Manikas testified.While critical in passing
of Maoist brutalities, Manikas offered no balanced analysis
of the Maoist insurgency that has gripped Nepal for the
past five to six years and the complex dynamics underlying
it. His target was King Gyanendra. Manikas accused the
king of consolidating the power of the monarchy over the
government and the army. He insisted that it was the failure
of the government to deal effectively with Maoist violence
that had led to a growing skepticism within the country
that progress could be made without restoring the democratic
process.
India's worries
India's worries concerning the NED are broad and indirect;
they are not linked to any particular capability of the
organization. India's northeast has long been in turmoil.
During the past five decades a number of guerrilla groups
have emerged there. New Delhi has been less than successful
in politically settling matters in northeast India. From
time to time, the Indian army has been called in to control
the violent guerrilla groups, and India has been accused
of human-rights violations in the northeast on more than
one occasion.
But, more importantly, India just does not want any more
foreign tampering in this unstable region. A
number of NGOs have sought security clearance for projects
on subjects unheard of in areas where such studies neither
appear relevant or feasible, according to sources in New
Delhi. The flow of foreign funds to carry out such
studies has made New Delhi sit up and take notice. According
to one estimate, more than 200 NGOs are operating in some
of the major states of northeastern India.
Over the years, several of India's
northeastern states have been heavily evangelized by Baptist
and other missionaries. Census figures indicate that more
than 85% of the residents in Mizoram are Christians. The
troubled state of Nagaland also has an overwhelming majority
of Christians. In the post-Cold War period, Dutch
missionaries have been found active in the northeastern
state of Tripura. These missionaries came in without seeking
formal permission from the government of India. It has
also been reported that guerrilla leaders in conflict
with New Delhi go to the Netherlands to meet Dutch NGO
officials prior to or after their meetings with officials
in New Delhi. At least one Dutch NGO involved in the northeastern
region is being funded by the Dutch government. New Delhi
is watching these developments carefully.
In addition, New Delhi is deeply concerned about northeast
India's on-going demographic change as a result of large-scale
illegal immigration of Muslim-Bangladeshis into Assam
and other areas. There are several districts in West Bengal
and Assam where Muslims have become a predominant majority
because of such illegal infiltration. This is worrisome
because there is little doubt that Bangladesh is fast
becoming a center of orthodox, if not violent, Islamic
activities. Many reports suggest that a large number of
al-Qaeda and Taliban have been settled in Bangladesh,
possibly with the help of Pakistan's Inter Press Service.
New Delhi has no idea how to deal with this problem. The
attempt at this time is to contain the Bangladeshi infiltration
and prevent the growth of anti-India elements in and around
the northeastern cauldron.
Bad memories evoked
Moreover, any American interest in India's northeast will
raise suspicions in the minds of those Indians who remember
a study prepared by the Special Operation Research Office
of the Washington-based George Washington University.
The objective was to conduct sociological research in
the northeastern states, including the kingdoms of Bhutan
and Sikkim. (At the time an independent kingdom, Sikkim
merged with India in 1975.) That study was seen as a precursor
to "Project Brahmaputra". As reportedly envisioned
by the US State Department at the time, Project Brahmaputra
was to initiate a movement for a "United States of
Assam", bringing together the northeastern insurgent
groups under a "Seven Units Liberation Army".
These schemes never got very far on the ground. But the
presence of a powerful American NGO in an area that is
far from stable understandably raises red flags for Indian
officials involved in the nation's security matters, who
have no intention of entertaining new versions of such
schemes.
The NED doles out over 300 grants per
year, with the average grant amount topping $50,000. Writing
for Slate online magazine, Brendan Koerner pointed on
January 22, 2004, that the endowment had four principal
initial recipients of funds: the International Republican
Institute; the National Democratic Institute for International
Affairs; an affiliate of the AFL-CIO, such as the American
Center for International Labor Solidarity and an affiliate
of the Chamber of Commerce, such as the Center for International
Private Enterprise.
According to a recent NED tax return, these four groups
each received $4,606,250 in 2001, which they in turn handed
out to pro-democracy groups as they saw fit. The idea
behind funneling equal amounts to these four groups is
to stress the non-partisan nature of the NED. Along the
same lines, the NED's board consists of bigwigs from both
parties, including Democratic presidential hopeful General
Wesley Clark and Republican Senator Jon Kyl.
Formed during the Ronald Reagan era in
the 1980s, the NED is a favorite of the Bush administration.
In fact, on the issue of spreading democracy around the
globe, the Bush administration and the NED are in total
sync. Not for nothing, President George W Bush, in his
January 22, 2004, state of the union message, vowed to
double the NED budget.
China's concerns China is a more direct target of
the NED. Reports have confirmed the identification, looting
and arson of Chinese and Turkish properties in Bishkek
on the evening the "Tulip" revolution"
took to the streets and drove out Akayev.
This should not come as a surprise. The NED has promoted
the anti-Beijing Uighur rebels' cause for a long time.
They hold regular meetings with the Uighur American Association
in the suburbs of Washington, DC. The doyen of the Uighurs
is one Rebiya Kadeer, who was released from a Chinese
prison just prior to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's
trip to Beijing in March.
China wants Bishkek to continue to clamp down on the
Uighur diaspora inside Kyrgyzstan, so that it cannot support
opposition to Beijing at home. Hitherto, China had been
very successful in persuading Akayev, using Chinese investment,
foreign aid and military-political support as leverage.
In the NED-driven new regime, which professes to be more
"democratic", Beijing fears Bishkek might be
inclined to support Uighurs across the border.
Chinese concern is not abstract. Already, Nury Turkel,
president of the Uighur American Association, in a statement
issued recently, has said: "... There are a few glimmers
of hope for Uighurs. In early 2004, the National Endowment
for Democracy, the American lifeline for dissidents worldwide,
gave my organization, the Uighur American Association,
a grant to begin human-rights research to document human-rights
abuses against Uighurs."
In November 2004, Rebiya Kadeer was awarded the Rafto
prize, a prestigious human-rights award. Kadeer was arrested
in 1997 while on her way to brief a US congressional delegation
on Uighur human rights. She was finally released by the
Chinese authorities on March 17, on "medical parole",
but it was the continued pressure exerted on the Chinese
government by the US and international human-rights organizations
- culminating in Rice's visit to Beijing - that truly
led to Kadeer's release.
Nury Turkel also pointed out that Bush knows about the
plight of Uighur Muslims in East Turkistan (Xinjiang province,
that is) and Tibetan Buddhists in Tibet. "Bush's
own religious beliefs lead us to believe that he is particularly
sensitive to religious repression everywhere," Turkel
added. "It was significant
that in October 2001, just a month after 9/11, he specifically
warned China not to use the fight against terrorism as
an excuse to persecute its minorities."
Again, Tibet According to Beijing, the presence
of the NED, backed by the Bush administration, in Nepal
raises the specter of an aggressive US involvement on
the Tibet issue. Over the past 10 years, Nepal
has rounded up nearly 6,000 Tibetans entering Nepal without
proper travel documents, but none could be prosecuted
because of the country's flexible immigration laws. The
age-old traditions valid in Nepal as well as in Tibet
do not allow Buddhists to be prosecuted for petty offences.
China has asked Nepal to cancel the residential permits
of Tibetans and make Tibetan tourists register with the
authorities each time they visit the country, especially
when they are coming from bordering India and Bhutan.
The pressure on the Tibetan issue came to the fore when
Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao reportedly cancelled
his Nepal visit during a recent South Asia tour because
King Gyanendra could not satisfy the Chinese demands.
One of the reasons why China is particularly anxious
about the Tibetans in Nepal is the British government's
reaction in January when Nepal closed down the Tibetan
Welfare Center and Tibetan Refugee Welfare Office that
have worked for the welfare of Tibetan refugees for nearly
five decades. "We regret the government action,"
said Mitra Pariyar, spokesman of the British Embassy in
Kathmandu. The embassy made a representation to the Nepalese
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Sudip Pathak, who heads the
Human Rights Organization of Nepal, and NGO, said his
organization supported the right of the Tibetans to practice
their religion and traditional culture in a peaceful manner
in Nepal. Pathak had met Nepal's home secretary, Chandi
Prasad Shrestha, to advocate the reopening of the two
centers.
Obviously, London saw the closure as a move by the Nepal
government to placate China. Subsequently, Brad Adams,
Asia director for the New York-based Human Rights Watch
(HRW)group issued a statement: "The Refugee Welfare
Office has been a critical safety net for tens of thousands
of persecuted Tibetans. Closing the office leaves thousands
of Tibetan refugees without crucial support." Although
the official channels of the US remained quiet, the HRW,
a prominent NGO, said what had been interpreted in Beijing
was Washington's voice on the subject.
Comment:
The US has been putting on the heat in Asia. As Bush recently
said, the US relationship with China is complicated. On
the one hand, WalMart and other US companies are closely
tied to Chinese manufacturing for making the products
that sell for so little on American shelves. As well,
the Chinese hold an enormous amount of US dollars in reserve,
and if it looked like they were starting to sell off those
reserves, the run on the US dollar would be disastrous
to the US economy.
On the other hand, the developing Chinese economy is
a direct competitor for the oil and gas resources in central
Asia, as is India. The Pentagon just came out with a report
that overestimates the Chinese military capacity according
to the Chinese and uses rhetoric the Chinese think is
reminiscent of the Cold War.
Those who denied
all the indications of environmental degradation, from
global warming to overpopulation, appear to have convinced
us to delay the solution until it is too late.
With each passing month it becomes
increasingly unlikely that the human species will come
to its senses before destroying the planet that gave it
life. It has been more than fifteen years since
the first convocation of scientists warned of the global
warming that our prodigal habits have initiated. Since
then corporate-owned politicians have conducted a Parthian
retreat on that issue, fighting rear-guard actions with
denials and counter-arguments, and those habits have only
worsened. As the principal creator of the problem, the
United States has not only expanded its own fossil-fuel
consumption but exported that bad habit to populous nations
that now promise to exceed our own degradation of the
atmosphere.
Population itself offers as great a threat as the fouling
of the air and the erosion of Earth’s ozone layer.
Our own country seems bent on imitating those Eastern
and Central American nations that have impoverished themselves
by filling their available space with dense masses of
people. One would think that the modern parental tendency
to indulge children ad nauseam would encourage smaller
families, if only because of the obvious link between
family size and resource distribution, but an absolute
refusal to recognize the inescapable limits of resources
seems to underlie every aspect of American life, if not
human existence. Those who think they have money enough
therefore continue spitting out three, four, five, or
more children, all of whom they dutifully imbue with token
doses of an insincere environmental consciousness.
Thanks to that early indoctrination in consumerism, the
next generation waits impatiently to inflict its own insatiable
appetite on an overburdened world. Sometime in the 1990s
our species began using up the planet’s renewable
resources faster than they can be restored, and the clock
is now ticking in years, or perhaps decades, rather than
in centuries or millennia. The gaggle of little faces
peering obliviously from the comfort of Mom’s air-conditioned
Suburban, Navigator, or Yukon will very likely see the
death struggle of their species as food and potable water
disappear, little realizing that they and their parents
brought that struggle on.
That final struggle for resources has, of course, already
begun. The crusade in Iraq and its associated conflicts
originated more with the competition for oil than with
religious differences, for oil drives the economy that
represents the Western equivalent of food production.
Aided by crooked politicians, water companies around this
country are racing to drain off water they pretend to
own, selling it to that exploding proportion of people
whose water has been polluted beyond recovery, meanwhile
hiring dough-faced engineers to convince the public that
groundwater supplies (like the buffalo and the land they
grazed) are inexhaustible. At the same time, most of that
"inexhaustible" landscape has been diced into
house lots and commercial strips, and the last open expanses
of the American West are being reduced to 40-acre "estates"
for future subdivision. The invisible human necessity
of peace and quiet has already essentially vanished: just
stop and listen.
The arrogance and ignorance of our leaders seems impossible
to reverse, but if it can be contained our planet may
be able to avoid a violent conclusion and end, instead,
with the predicted whimper. Should that be the case, those
of us who are already old enough may manage to wind out
our time in relative comfort. For many of our remaining
days we may enjoy the luxury of seeing a wild turkey herding
her brood, or hearing the hooted inquiries of a predawn
owl, or the magenta-and-azure sunrise that crested Pleasant
Mountain at 4:45 this morning. Until such pleasures disappear,
one by one, we will continue to find some wonder in the
world. Like our ancestors, we probably have time enough
to let our grandchildren write our epitaphs, but that
generation will also have to write its own.
Comment:
What could we have done to change the outcome? It wasn't
laws or revolutions that could have made a difference;
it was only the species waking up to its own split personalities
and working to fuse them. To make a difference in the
outcome, it would have taken a mass awakening to our true
natures, and how likely was that ever to happen?
However, we do think that there is hope because we live
in a non-linear world. We do think that small acts can
have a powerful effect in the long term. That is why we
must continue standing up for the truth today, tomorrow,
and no matter how horrible it becomes the day after that.
We have the conviction that the day that we never believed
possible is on its way. Just read the page above and see
what a leap it has taken towards chaos since the beginning
of July.
Standing for the truth with no anticipation of the outcome
is its own reward. However, it is not a choice to be taken
out of despair or because we see no other way forward.
It is a choice that must be taken because we see that
it is the right choice in and of itself, the choice we
would make even if there were other possibilities. And
there are: we can ignore what has happening, or if we
are aware, we can choose to make the best of things, "eat,
drink and be merry for tomorrow we die..." We see
people around us every day who have these choices. We
see them, we understand why they have taken that route,
but we know that we can not. It just isn't possible; it
just isn't in us to do that. And we include you in our
use of "we", gentle readers, for if you keep
coming back to read these pages, it is because you do
not want to shut your eyes, you do not want to go back
to sleep, because you know that is the worst possible
choice of all.
By DANIEL YEE
Associated Press
Thu Jul 21, 2:04 PM ET
ATLANTA - Americans have lower
levels of lead, secondhand-smoke byproducts and other
potentially dangerous substances in their bodies than
they did a decade ago, according to perhaps the most
extensive government study ever of exposure to environmental
chemicals.
"These data help relieve worry and concern,"
Dr. Julie Gerberding, director of the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, said Thursday.
The CDC released its first National Report on Exposure
to Environmental Chemicals in 2001 and has updated it
every two years. For its latest findings, the CDC took
blood and urine samples from about 2,400 people in 2001
and 2002 and tested for 148 environmental chemicals,
including metals, pesticides, insect repellants and
disinfectants.
The CDC stressed that the presence of an environmental
chemical in blood or urine "does not mean that
the chemical causes disease."
In the early 1990s, 4.4 percent of U.S. children ages
1 to 5 had elevated lead levels. That dropped to 1.6
percent between 1999 and 2002, according to the latest
study.
"This is an astonishing public health achievement"
that is related to the removal of lead from gasoline
and other efforts to screen and treat children for lead
exposure, Gerberding said.
Gauging the effect of secondhand smoke, the CDC tested
for nonsmokers' levels of cotinine, a product of nicotine
after it enters the body. Levels dropped by 75 percent
in adults and 68 percent in children between the early
1990s and 2002, the CDC said.
Gerberding said the decrease came from restrictions
on smoking.
But more work needs to be done to reduce secondhand
smoke, she said. Blacks still had more than twice the
cotinine levels of whites or Mexican-Americans. Levels
in children were more than twice those of nonsmoking
adults.
The study looked at 38 chemicals, mainly pesticides,
that were not measured during the last CDC analysis,
in 2003. [...]
Other findings:
• About 5 percent of smokers 20 or older had
the heavy metal cadmium in their blood at a level that
could cause a kidney injury. Cadmium can come from cigarette
smoke.
• Traces of aldrin and dieldrin, pesticides for
cotton and corn discontinued in 1970 in the U.S., are
either very low or undetectable in U.S. adults.
• No women in the survey had dangerous concentrations
of methyl mercury, which can come from eating shellfish
or fish. However, the CDC said mercury levels in women
of childbearing age should be monitored because 5.7
percent of women in this age group had levels close
to what is believed to cause birth defects. [...]
Comment: We
suspect that a study that compares the levels of various
dangerous chemicals in Americans to the citizens of
several other nations would be even more interesting.
By Don Babwin
Associated Press
Wednesday, July 20, 2005
CHICAGO - Lawns are turning brown.
Flowers are wilting. Water levels
are so low that ducks can stand in some rivers and streams.
A drought that is stunting corn, rice and soybean crops
across the nation's Farm Belt is also leading many communities
in more urban parts of the Midwest to ban lawn-watering
and urge homeowners to conserve.
"I'm not watering out of respect for what is happening
ecologically," said Tod Lending, gesturing toward
his the parched front lawn on Chicago's North Side.
"I have a 10-year-old daughter and I'm trying to
teach her what the right thing is to do ecologically."
In Indianapolis, officials have pleaded
with customers to cut their water use. St. Peters, Mo.,
made a similar request. So did
Chicago, where WGN-TV meteorologist Dennis Haller said
this is the driest summer so far in 135 years.
In North Aurora, homeowners can hand-water flowers
and gardens, but using a sprinkler can bring a fine
of $750. Algonquin, in suburban Chicago, and Waterford,
Wis., are limiting residents to watering every other
day. Brownsburg, Ind., banned it. [...]
The city of Chicago has stopped watering the grass
at parks. And the Fire Department decided to teach fire
hose techniques to its firefighters at a park so the
ground would benefit from the water sprayed.
The drought-stricken
area cuts a swath from eastern Texas up into the Great
Lakes region, taking in parts of Missouri, Indiana,
Arkansas, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Michigan, and almost
all of Illinois. [...]
Conserving water can be a tough sell in Chicago, where
the city's front yard Lake Michigan is a body of water
about the size of West Virginia.
The level of Lake Michigan is only slightly below normal.
But Sadhu Johnston, commissioner of Chicago's Department
of Environment, warned: "If
Chicago and other cities along the lake just continued
pulling more and more water out of the lake, the level
would drop" and devastate everything from fish
to the shipping industry.
"There are all sorts of implications; it's unbelievable,"
he said.
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - California
looked set to escape without power blackouts on Thursday,
allaying earlier fears sparked by record breaking demand
in the southern half of the state and a series of power
plant breakdowns, a spokesman for the state's Independent
System Operator said.
But the ISO said Friday could see new problems as temperatures
rose in the northern half of the state.
The state agency warned earlier on Thursday that rotating
blackouts were possible, but demand for power started
to dip from record breaking levels late in the afternoon.
"Load is starting to really come off now and I
think we are in better shape in terms of the rest of
this afternoon and this evening," spokesman Gregg
Fishman said.
The operator, which controls most of the state's power
grid, declared a transmission emergency early on Thursday
afternoon as high demand linked to scorching heat and
a series of power plant outages sparked some voltage
problems.
Within minutes it also declared a stage two power alert
for southern California, but the situation eased later.
"That (voltage) has largely stabilized. We did
find a bit of extra generation," Fishman said.
RECORD DEMAND
Southern California Edison, a unit
of Edison International, said its customer demand reached
21,934 megawatts of power on Thursday, a new high. The
previous record of 21,112 MW was set on Wednesday with
a heatwave engulfing the southern half of the state.
The Los Angeles
Department of Water and Power, the nation's largest
municipal utility, on Thursday broke a demand record
that had stood for almost seven years with a peak of
5,661 MW, a spokeswoman said. [...]
"Tomorrow (Friday) is going to be another interesting
day," he said, noting utilities had already been
asked to restrict maintenance in a bid to maximize available
power supplies. [...]
By Peggy Andersen
ASSOCIATED PRESS
2:02 p.m. July 21, 2005
SEATTLE – There's
a whole lotta shakin' going on at Mount St. Helens these
days as the restless peak does what it has done for thousands
of years: build new lava domes that totter and fall and
become the foundations for still more new ones.
A series of unusually strong earthquakes – exceeding
magnitude 3 – has been reported in recent days by
the Cascades Volcano Laboratory in Vancouver, Wash., about
50 miles south of the mountain. The latest was a magnitude
3.1 quake early Thursday that was accompanied by a rockfall.
Rockfalls during the quakes send up plumes of ash. Some
tower thousands of feet above the 8,364-foot crater rim;
a March plume reached 30,000 feet, raising concerns about
area air traffic. Some plumes don't escape the crater
and some wispy, gritty puffs crest just above the rim.
The recent stronger quakes are related to rockfall from
the mountain's towering, unstable new dome, said research
hydrologist Jon Major at the lab. But it's not quite clear
how.
"It's sort of a chicken-egg thing," he said,
questioning whether shallow quakes are causing the rockfall
or whether collapsing rock is thundering to the crater
floor and setting off seismic monitors.
The mountain, site of a devastating 1980 eruption that
killed 57 people and sent a river of hot mud and ash down
the Toutle River Valley, rumbled back to life last September.
After eight years of quiet, magma from deep below the
mountain pressed toward the surface, surfacing as lava
on the crater floor in October.
Since then, tons of rock have been extruded into the
huge crater, which is open on the north side from the
sideways blast of 1980. Initially, the rock formed a mass
described as a "whale back," a mound of hot
stone between the old dome and the south crater wall.
Lately, extruding rock has been piling up on the west
side of the crater.
"This is much narrower, like a spine ... like a
long linear ridge," Major said. "It's almost
like a large tooth ... getting steeper and steeper."
The height of the new dome was measured at 7,600 feet
in April – about 700 feet below the rim. With all
the rockfall and rebuilding, that number is probably still
good, he said.
"The active part of the dome has grown up and gotten
quite steep and now it's starting to fall apart. These
larger quakes seem to be associated with the decomposition
process," Major said. "Gravity exerting its
influence, I guess you could say."
There have been periodic bursts of seismic activity since
fall, peaking in the 3.0 range and then subsiding to smaller
quakes – barely perceptible temblors of magnitude
1 or 2 or less – that occur every four to seven
minutes.
"One line of thought is that these larger earthquakes
represent growth of fractures in the dome," Major
said. The recent seismic activity is very shallow, near
the surface.
"This is very characteristic of what this mountain
has done over its history," he said.
St. Helens' snow-capped symmetrical Mount Fuji-like cone,
destroyed in 1980 when the top third of the mountain was
blown away, was "probably only about 4,500 years
old," he said – very young in geologic terms.
The mountain is the youngest and most restless volcano
in the Cascade Range.
Examination of the inside crater walls reveals that "the
interior is just composed of a series of overlapping domes,"
Major said. "What's happening now in the crater is
just a reflection of what this volcano has done throughout
its geologic history."
Over time, as lava piles up on the crater floor, "the
crater will probably be filled with coalescing lava domes
and form a cone."
But St. Helens' racy pace is relative. The process could
take hundreds of years.
"In my lifetime, I do not expect to see that crater
fill and have a nice conical mountain build up and look
like it did prior to 1980," Major said.
Before the eruption, St. Helens towered 9,677 feet.
Scientists discovered
mysterious circles on the area of the ancient Russian
town of Arkaim, which is the same age with Egypt and Babylon
President Putin has recently visited one of the most
mysterious places on planet Earth - the ruins of the ancient
town of Arkaim, which is situated on the outskirts of
the city of Chelyabinsk. Historians, archaeologists and
ufologists have spent many years trying to unravel the
secrets of the town. Which nation was living in Arkaim
more than 40 centuries ago? How did people of such ancient
civilization manage to accomplish incredible technological
progress, which still seems to be unachievable nowadays?
A group of Russian researchers, with Vadim Chernobrovy
at the head, has recently returned from the mysterious
region. The scientist said that specialists and students
had built numerous tent camps around Arkaim.
The Arkaim valley in the south of Ural was supposed to
be flooded in 1987: local authorities were going to create
a water reservoir there to irrigate droughty fields. However,
scientists found strange circles in the center of the
valley: the authorities gave archaeologists 12 months
to explore the area. Scientists were shocked to find out
that Arkaim was the same age as Egypt and Babylon, and
a little older than Troy and Rome.
Gennady Zdanovich, the chairman of the archaeological
expedition in Ural had to prove the scientific significance
of Arkaim to regional officials. "We achieved what
seemed to be absolutely unreal: the multi-million construction
project in the region was shut down," the scientist
said.
Archaeological excavations showed that the people, who
inhabited Arkaim, represented one of the most ancient
Indo-European civilizations, particularly the branch,
which is referred to as the Aryan culture. Arkaim turned
out to be not only a town, but also a temple and an astronomic
observatory.
"A flight above Arkaim on board a helicopter gives
you an incredible impression. The huge concentric circles
on the valley are clearly visible. The town and its outskirts
are all enclosed in the circles. We still do not know,
what point the gigantic circles have, whether they were
made for defensive, scientific, educational, or ritual
purposes. Some researchers say that the circles were actually
used as the runway for an ancient spaceport," Vadim
Chernobrovy said.
Researchers discovered that the ancient town was equipped
with the storm sewage system, which helped Arkaim's residents
avoid floods. The people were protected against fires
as well: timbered floorings and houses themselves were
imbued with fireproof substance. It was a rather strong
compound, the remnants of which can still be found in
the ruins of the town.
Each house was outfitted with "all modern conveniences,"
as they would say nowadays. There was a well, an oven
and dome-like food storage in every house. The well was
branching out into two underground trenches: one of them
was directed to the oven and the other one ended in the
food storage. The trenches were used to supply chilly
air to the oven and to the food storage. The cool air
from the trenches was also creating a very powerful traction
force in the Aryan oven, which made it possible to smelt
bronze there.
The central square in Arkaim was the only object of square
shape in the town. Judging upon traces of bonfires that
were placed in a specific order on the square, the place
was used as a site for certain rituals.
Arkaim was built according to a previously projected
plan as a single complicated complex, which also had an
acute orientation on astronomic objects. While archaeologists
are meticulously brushing dust off ancient stones trying
to recreate the lifestyle of Arkaim's residents, ufologists
study mysterious phenomena, which they register in the
town: inexplicable fluctuations of voltage, magnetic field
tension, temperatures and so on.
By Jude Webber
Updated: 9:34 p.m. ET July 20, 2005
LIMA, Peru - Archaeologists
in Peru have found a “quipu” on the site of
the oldest city in the Americas, indicating that the device,
a sophisticated arrangement of knots and strings used
to convey detailed information, was in use thousands of
years earlier than previously believed.
Previously the oldest known quipus, often associated
with the Incas whose vast South American empire was conquered
by the Spanish in the 16th century, dated from about A.D.
650.
But Ruth Shady, an archaeologist leading investigations
into the Peruvian coastal city of Caral, said quipus were
among a treasure trove of articles discovered at the site,
which is about 5,000 years old.
“This is the oldest quipu, and it shows us that
this society ... also had a system of ‘writing’
(which) would continue down the ages until the Inca empire
and would last some 4,500 years,” Shady said.
She was speaking before the opening in Lima Tuesday of
an exhibition of the artifacts which shed light on Caral,
which she called one of the world’s oldest civilizations.
Found among offerings
The quipu, with its well-preserved, brown cotton strings
wound around thin sticks, was found with a series of offerings
including mysterious fiber balls of different sizes wrapped
in ”nets” and pristine reed baskets.
“We are sure it corresponds to the period of Caral
because it was found in a public building,” Shady
said. “It was an offering placed on a stairway when
they decided to bury this and put down a floor to build
another structure on top.”
Pyramid-shaped public buildings were being built at Caral,
a planned coastal city 115 miles (185 kilometers) north
of Lima, at the same time that the Saqqara pyramid, the
oldest in Egypt, was going up. They were were already
being revamped when Egypt’s Great Pyramid of Cheops
(or Khufu) was under construction, Shady said.
“Man only began living in an organized way 5,000
years ago in five points of the globe — Mesopotamia
(roughly comprising modern Iraq and part of Syria), Egypt,
India, China and Peru,” Shady said. Caral was 3,200
years older than cities of another ancient American civilization,
the Maya, she added.
Caral ‘advanced alone’
Shady said no equivalent of the “Rosetta Stone”
that deciphered the hieroglyphs of ancient Egypt had yet
been found to fully unlock the language of the quipus,
but said their existence pointed to a sophisticated, organized
society where such information as production, taxes and
debts were recorded.
“They came up with their own system becausem unlike
cities in the Old World which had contact with each other
and exchanged knowledge and experiences, this (city) in
Peru was isolated in the Americas, and advanced alone.”
Caral’s arid location at an altitude of 11,500
feet (3,500 meters) has helped preserve its treasures,
such as piles of raw cotton — still uncombed and
containing seeds, though turned a dirty brown by the ages
— and a ball of cotton thread.
The exhibition includes some of the 25 huge whale bones
fashioned into chairs found at the site, as well as a
cotton-soled sandal and flutes and pipes made from animal
horns, pelican or condor bones or reeds.
The remains of jungle fruits, cactus fiber and shells
revealed trade with distant regions and a block of salt
the size of a small laptop computer was found in Caral’s
main temple, suggesting salt may have had religious as
well as commercial value.
Shady said representations on clay figurines had helped
show that nobles wore their hair in two long ponytails
each side of the face, with a fringe at the front and
the hair
LONDON - The
word "fail" should be banned from use in British
classrooms and replaced with the phrase "deferred
success" to avoid demoralizing pupils, a group
of teachers has proposed.
Members of the Professional Association
of Teachers (PAT) argue that telling pupils they have
failed can put them off learning for life.
A spokesman for the group said it wanted to avoid labeling
children. "We recognize that children do not necessarily
achieve success first time," he said.
"But I recognize that we can't just strike a word
from the dictionary," he said.
The PAT said it would debate the proposal at a conference
next week.