As many of you know,
Signs of the Times is not supported by major funding like
many other news sites, and is not affiliated with any
government, political group, corporation, or news agency.
SOTT is financed by any donations we receive as well as
money out of our own pockets. The benefit of this setup
is that we do not have any sponsors that might introduce
unwanted bias into our work. The
obvious and major drawback is that we do not have the
funding to do all the things we would like to do for our
readers.
Almost one year ago, SOTT created the P3nt4gon Str!ke presentation, which has now been viewed by
well over 300,000,000 people worldwide, and is available
in nine different languages. Recently, we wrote and produced
the song You
Lied, performed by Away
With the Fairys. We also recorded our first ever podcast,
beginning a project which we had been trying to get off
the ground for over a year.
A
SOTT editor poses next to his computer
To produce the Signs page, we work very long days (often
upwards of 14-16 hours) without pay. We do it because
we love it, and because our readers often write to tell
us how they have benefited from our work. In order to
continue expanding our work and deepen our analysis and
understanding of our world, we need to enlarge our library.
There are many books we would like to have that we cannot
afford. With our increasing use of sound files and our
future projects that include video, we have and will continue
to incur higher bandwidth costs. As well, the Signs page
and related projects are created on several computers
which are each upwards of five years old. They are very
slow, increasingly unreliable, and won't support regular
podcasts and videos.
Unfortunately, we do not have the financial means to
purchase the books we need, much less new equipment. Current
donations only support our basic needs and living expenses.
In order to continue producing the Signs page, the podcast,
Flash presentations, and expand our operations further,
we need your support.
At the moment, we are preparing six Signs of the
Times Commentary books. These books are collections
of SOTT commentary grouped according to theme. They will
be available for sale soon, and any proceeds will go towards
helping to cover our increasing operating costs.
Our target, based on estimated costs for all the necessary
materials, upgrades, and operating costs for the coming
year is 28,000 euros.
--
Here's How You Can Help Signs of the Times --
Any donation you
can make will help us to continue to produce and improve
the Signs page.
If you donate 50 euros
(approximately US$60; click
here for current exchange rate), you will be a Bronze
Supporter.
Bronze
Supporters will receive a complementary
copy of the 911 Conspiracy Signs
Commentary book.
If you donate 100
euros, you will be a Silver
Supporter.
Silver
Supporters will receive a complementary copy
of 911 Conspiracy, US Freedom, and The
Media.
Donations
of 175 euros will qualify you as a Gold
Supporter.
Gold
Supporters will receive the entire set of
six commentary books: 911 Conspiracy, The
Human Condition, The Media, Religion,
US Freedom, and The Work.
Donations of 250 euros will
qualify you as a Platinum Supporter.
Platinum
Supporters will receive the entire set of
six commentary books: 911 Conspiracy, The
Human Condition, The Media, Religion,
US Freedom, and The Work. In addition,
they will receive one other book of their choice free
from our bookstore.
We have more projects like our podcast in
the works - but we need your
help to make them a reality!
Thank
you in advance from the editors and the rest of the team
at Signs of the Times!
If
you like music but don't like Bush, then check out the latest
Signs of the Times production, You Lied.
The words are now translated into French, German, Spanish, Italian,
and Portuguese.
Looking back over the
history of the monotheistic religions, one could make
a pretty good case for the argument that:
They are systems of control used to manipulate groups
of people within societies;
They are systems of control used to provoke hatred
between peoples who worship different aspects of the
overall monotheistic theology;
They discourage independent thought and critical thinking;
They encourage ritualistic behaviour the real meaning
of which has been lost and is not understood by the
practitioner;
They have taken whatever germ of spiritual truth they
may have had initially and crushed it;
Their impact on human life is overwhelmingly negative.
The foundation of the monotheistic religions are the
books of the Jews, works that are claimed to be the word
of God himself, but which were more likely to have been
artfully cobbled together from various sources during
the exile in Babylon to give a common history to disparate
tribes. No archaeological work has ever uncovered anything
in the way of remains of the supposed Temple of Solomon,
nor does it show Jerusalem of the Davidic epoch to be
anything more than a "typical hill country village"
during the period ascribed to David. You can be certain
that both Jewish and Christian archaeologists have been
spending years looking for such hard evidence because
so much is riding on the find, but they have found nothing
to confirm the glorious tales of David and Solomon as
told in the Bible.
If the historical veracity of the great kingdom of David
goes down the drain, the rest of the Bible goes with it.
But the Temple is not the only historical problem.
The story of Moses and the slavery of the Jews in Egypt
appears to have been a rewriting of events that occurred
during the time of Akhenaton, perhaps mixed with the history
of an exodus from Egypt that occurred much earlier. The
curious result of accepting the Bible as history is that
it is then used to date Egyptian dynasties, usually by
Christians from Europe who had a vested interest in making
Egyptian history fit the "Biblical record".
As result of this, the dating of the reign of Akhenaton
is several hundred years after it is most likely that
he lived. Events of Akhenaton's rule appear to us to match
the period of the eruption of Thera on the island of Santorini
which has been dated to 1628 BC. For more information
on these topics, we refer you to The
Secret History of the World by Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
The Old Testament is not history, it is fantasy. What
about the history of Jesus? Was there an historical figure
from Nazareth who was crucified by the Romans, whose story
is accurately recounted in the Gospels?
No.
Textual analysis of the gospels shows us that they were
put together at different times and for different audiences.
They were based upon an earlier
document, known as Q, that collected the
sayings of a Cynic-like teacher. The earliest documents
mention nothing of the crucifixion, nothing of the life
of the man behind the teachings. That story, in other
words, "the historical Jesus", was put together
much, much later, and there exists no historical evidence
from the period that would independently confirm the gospel
stories. All we have to go on are the religious texts
of Christianity itself, which as we have seen from the
Jewish texts, are being promoted by people with a vested
interest in the outcome of the debate.
Islam claims to be a further development of the same
tradition. Yet if the historical basis for the first two
have been shown to be invalid, then the religion of the
sons and daughters of Ishmael is also deprived of its
foundations. All three appeal to a divine source, a source
that cannot be put into question by mere mortals. Their
authority rests upon this divine source and the belief
that the texts are literally "the word of God".
The literal believers of the Word of God, be it the Judaic,
the Christian, or the Islamic, are put into a corner because
modern archaeological and textual research have removed
the foundations of their belief systems, and we know what
happens when someone is backed into a corner and is given
no way out. They will fight to the death to preserve themselves.
And since each version of monotheism invalidates its predecessor,
they must fight each other as well as that modern demon,
secular society.
There is something about our root systems of belief,
and this extends beyond religion to the modern, rational
forms of belief such as humanism, or certain forms of
belief in science or even democracy, that they seem to
us both self-evident and unquestionable. To question the
basis of our beliefs is to put ourselves as individuals
into question because we identify so strongly with them.
A fervent evangelical Christian could no more put this
system of ideas and beliefs into question than could the
Pope, the settlers in the occupied territories killing
Palestinians to steal their land, an imam in a Moslem
country, or Richard Dawkins at his desk at Oxford.
However, we see that these beliefs are constantly under
attack because the mere existence of another system claiming
the same status as final arbiter of behaviour, custom,
and thought, and therefore, of identity, is a threat.
There can only be one absolutist position, one place at
the top of the pyramid, one boss. Therefore, the true
believer must draw around himself a line in the sand that
circumscribes Truth, within which stand the faithful,
and outside of which are found the pagan, the heathen,
the non-believer. Here we find a second level of identification,
a negative form of "all that I am not" whereby
one takes all attributes of "good" and "holy"
for oneself and assigns the opposite attributes to the
Other, to those outside of the circle. Having done this
calculation, it is then very easy for the believer to
be manipulated into believing that the Other is less-than-human.
Such demonisation is necessary during periods of conflict
and war. When the two sides have thoroughly demonised
the opponent, they will stop at nothing, no humiliation,
no form of torture or brutality, because inflicting such
punishment is a way to reinforce one's own specialness.
This process is repeated by each and every member of
any absolutist belief structure, which means just about
every person on the face of the planet. No wonder things
are such a mess.
In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries with the
rise of rationalism in the West, the religious structure
began to be replaced by the scientific mindset which displaced
the Earth from the centre of the universe, posited the
existence of other worlds in the Cosmos, and proposed
that mankind, rather than being created in the physical
image of God, was the result of a long process of evolution
from simpler forms of life. The Word of God as transcribed
in the Bible was put into question. Identification with
national structures became more and more pronounced, so
that one's nationality took precedence over one's common
religious affiliations in many Western countries. To reconcile
the religious and the national, politicians would claim
that God was on their side. Many Jews continue to place
their tribal or religious affiliation before their national
identity, while among the Arabs, there is still a strong
pan-Arab sentiment that is closely tied in with Islam.
Against the modern way of structuring the world arose
the first forms of modern Christian fundamentalism, an
attempt to return to the old days of certainty and unquestionable
rules, coupled with the fervent belief that no matter
the trials and tribulations in the here and now, there
was a better world awaiting in the hereafter for those
who maintained their faith in the face of their earthly
suffering.
In Arab countries, the existence of corrupt, secular
states that were beholden to Western interests laid the
groundwork for the rise of calls to a return to traditional
Islam, or the return to Islamic law, the Sharia. Here,
religious, national, and pan-Arabic structures all come
into play because with globalisation, Western customs
are imposed, in this case, with appeals to the divinity
of "the market", and traditional ways of life,
which may only be tangentially linked with Islam, are
lost. This interweaving of different levels heightens
the tensions. The ruthless use of force on the part of
Israel, the United States, and their allies in imposing
the belief structures of "the market", Judaism,
or Christianity on the Arab and Muslim people calls forth
a resistance. This reaction is normal and quite mechanical.
Newton described it in his third law of dynamics: for
every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
When one body exerts a force on another, the second body
exerts on the first a force of equal magnitude in the
opposite direction. We should therefore not be surprised
that there is a reaction on the part of Muslims to the
modern Crusade launched by Bush and his neocon friends.
As this reaction is easily predictable, the next step
is for the aggressor to seek to control it. We know that
American intelligence agencies were in Afghanistan while
the Russians were there, supporting the Islamic "freedom
fighters". This was, of course, before these same
people became "terrorists" after the Russians
were expelled. There are sites that offer evidence that
British intelligence has long been connected with the
Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. None of this should be surprising.
It simply makes sense from a strategic point of view for
the occupier to infiltrate and seek to manipulate the
resistance.
While we may appear to have moved away from our initial
discussion on religion, it should be clear that religion
is a powerful motivator because it appeals to absolutes.
Things are always all or nothing. One is saved or one
is not. One is a believer, or one is an infidel. It is
a zero-sum game where only one player can win, and every
gain for one player means a loss for another player.
Clearly, the only way out of this impasse is to get rid
of such belief structures altogether, but as they are
so tightly bound with our ideas of who we are, as they
are the foundations of all we think and believe, the work
of rooting them out can only take place one individual
at a time. Such work cannot be imposed on anyone because
it would then become nothing more than the replacement
of one structure by another, based upon an appeal to the
authority of the one with the power to impose it. Rooting
out belief structures must be done by each of us, at our
own speed, motivated by an internal drive to be free.
Only then can we put our basic assumptions into question.
A group of like-minded individuals is also necessary because
we often are blind to the deepest of our beliefs. They
are so "self-evident" that we don't see them.
But, here again, the group is not there to impose its
point of view. It exists to help us free ourselves and
find the answers for ourselves, or to be able to admit
where there is not enough data in hand to come to a response
and so the answer must be held in abeyance.
Such a liberatory structure is more a method than a system
of answers because any answer has the potential to be
revised when new data arrives. Furthermore, the more we
learn, the more we learn how to learn so the method itself
is open to constant improvement. In short, nothing is
fixed except the direction we wish to move. When we start,
we may not even know enough to have more than an intuition
of what the destination is like. We do not have the knowledge
to judge it or to know it in detail beforehand.
But of one thing we can be certain from observation:
the monotheistic religions are traps. Judaism, Christianity,
and Islam are walls we erect within us to keep us apart
and above others on the ladder of power. Whatever spiritual
truths they hold come from a far older tradition, one
that encouraged people to see the world objectively and
free from the type of all-encompassing explanatory and
belief structures these religions have become. It is likely
that these religions arose in opposition to this older
tradition, as means of co-opting it and turning its deeper,
spiritual truths into a tool for power in the material
world.
The first step to the spiritual life is the renunciation
all forms of belief systems, and that includes religion.
Gary McKinnon has a lot to worry
about. His job prospects are bleak. He will shortly
have to leave his home in North London and could be
facing up to 70 years in a US federal prison - a prospect
that terrifies him.
His actions have been well recorded. Over a period
of years he managed to bypass the security of what should
be the most sophisticated IT systems on the planet,
many of which belong to the US Department of Defense
(DoD) and NASA.
That was back in 2002 and he
has already been investigated thoroughly by the legal
authorities in this country and released without charge.No one in the UK justice system
considered him a threat. But the slow-working cogs of
the US legal system have finally clicked into action
leaving him hanging in limbo awaiting an extradition
hearing later this month.
The unemployed UFO enthusiast was, metaphorically speaking,
able to walk right in, look around and make himself
at home in what are supposedly some of the most secure
systems in the world. Although breaking into the DoD
required a combination of ingenuity and hours of mindless
drudgery, ultimately it was the "dangerously lax
IT systems" that made it possible, he claims. And
as for the "minor" damage to the systems concerned,
it was not deliberate but happened accidentally while
he was trying to cover his tracks.
Mckinnon, now 39, admits that there was a period of
his life when he was "addicted" to computers.
It threatened his life, his health and his relationships
at the time, but he couldn't leave them alone.
His interest in IT was sparked, as it was for many
others, by an interest in science, science fiction and
the unknown. It was the search for proof of extraterrestrial
life and a potential cover-up around the events of 11
September, 2001, that led him to the restricted government
sites to begin with.
His story raises some critical issues around the rights
of British citizens accused of committing a crime in
the US, the state of IT security internationally and
the possible existence of antigravity technology in
a US military establishment.
Q: Why do you think the US authorities
behaved the way they did, with an extradition order?
A :Well, the reason they give is that I, on my own,
closed down the entire metro district of Washington
for a few days, including a weapons station, which I
dispute. My thing was being quiet and not being seen
and getting the information out. And also, when I was
there, you do a NetStat routine and you see all the
other connections to that machine and there is a permanent
weakness for foreign hackers because their security
is not even lax, it is non-existent. You wouldn't believe
it.
They might claim that by installing a remote control
program, I opened them [the systems] up, but the access
was already there. I didn't even have to crack passwords.
What about the damage you are
said to have caused?
What they call damage is really just them realising
that they have been accessed without authorisation.
Then they say things like I deleted 300 users, deleted
systems files and such. That was one instance when I
did a batch file to clean up all my stuff. I think once
and only once, though perhaps I ran it on the root drive
of the "c:" drive. But it certainly wasn't
every machine I was on and, if you believe them, they
talk about 94 networks being damaged.
Surely all the data was backed
up anyway?
Well, it should be and it should be behind a firewall,
and the local administrator should not have a blank
password. Take one defence computer where they use image-based
installation techniques where most of the machines have
the same BIOS, the same hard drive, the same hardware
specification and you just whack it out across the systems.
Unfortunately for them, the local system administrator's
password was blank. So you don't even need to become
the domain administrator. That's 5,000 machines all
with a blank system level administrator password. To
be fair to them, as I got deeper into it they closed
me down pretty quickly.
Did it worry you, this lack
of protection for systems?
I was always very frightened when I realised there were
always other people from all over the world on there.
These were like foreign ISPs, routinely going through
things. It is very worrying that it is the world's only
superpower and it is that easy to breach security.
What were you doing prior to
the most recent arrest?
I wanted to get the trailing documentation to screw
the Americans. I looked at things and I didn't like
what I was seeing. They talk about the war on terror
and meanwhile they are training people in torture techniques,
breaking and entering and close-quarter fighting and
these are all little South American dictatorships. And
then there is the humanist angle of anti-gravity technology
and the 9/11 thing, but that didn't get very far.
Was your main motivation the
search for extra-terrestrials?
That is how it started off and it then grew into suspicions
about 9/11, because there are hundreds of unanswered
questions about 9/11, the dragging away of all the forensics
evidence, and the sale of all the concrete and steel
to China. Even the firemen of New York organised their
own web site to complain that this isn't a proper process.
Then there are the schools for terrorists run by America
to help Latin-American dictatorships and stuff.
So when you were searching for extraterrestrial life
how did you feel about it? Was it just fun?
It was mainly very, very boring. You had to trawl through
so much and bear in mind that it wasn't publicly accessible
Web sites, it was all private military Web sites. So
it was about logistics, support and, basically, as soon
as I controlled a network I ran a file-searching program
looking for keywords in files. So it was exciting every
time you did turn up something, which only happened
a few times, that was very exciting. I called it research,
but it is a bit of a misnomer really.
Was the fun part just in being
where you are not supposed to be?
Yes. There is a definite illicit thrill that didn't
last very long. The issues around the UFO thing, as
I discovered more and learned more, became much more
serious. Eventually it became all about the issue of
suppressed technology. I know for a fact that they have
antigravity and the basic quantum-physical mechanics
of having antigravity imply a free source of energy,
getting energy direct from the vacuum. Now to me that
would stop all the wars over oil. It would help fight
famine and with irrigation. It would be free energy
and that is a huge thing.
So the US has have developed
an antigravity device?
Yes. Recently, I think two years ago, Boeing Aerospace
announced that they were putting $50m (£28m) into
investigating antigravity research. For me, the timing
was interesting because I think it is something they
already have, but it's not general knowledge and if
they were caught they would probably say that it was
renegade factions high-up in NASA, high-up in the military
and high-up in commerce.
How do you come across these
things? Is information on antigravity devices freely
available?
Some of it is but it is a combination of what is freely
available and what isn't. Take the Disclosure Project
which is a Washington lobbyist group run by Steven Greer,
a military doctor, and he had 300 testimonials in his
book from people, ranging from civilian air traffic
controllers to ex-commanders-in-chief of NATO, all saying
'yes, UFOs exist, yes certain parts of the military
know about this, and have this and are using the technology
and implementing a trickle-down thing so that eventually
the technology will be everywhere.'
How does the possibility of
being extradited to the US make you feel?
Better than I was the first time around [the 2002 case],
although it is very similar. I had lots of work lined
up which was Internet-related - computer games testing
- and I have lost that because of my bail conditions.
My landlord wants me out, because of all the press and
police attention we had so it is a bit of a rerun of
2002. Lost the flat, lost the work but I managed to
keep the girlfriend this time. For a few days it was
very dark but I am feeling quite up now because we have
been talking to [Conservative MP] Boris Johnson who
is leading a Parliamentary Early Day Motion against
the 2003 Extradition Act along with the Enron Three
[three British bankers who are also facing extradition
to the US] - or the NatWest Three as they like to be
called now. So together we are trying to get a judicial
review going and change the law.
So what is the official position?
I asked my solicitor why the CPS had taken my case away
from the UK police and handed it to the US. She was
speaking to someone who was fairly high up and he said
that it had gone way above his head. Reading between
the lines, that means the Home Office.
Is that a good thing?
No. It almost sounds like a done deal to me. The fact
that I am not alone is encouraging. We are getting nearly
70 MPs signed up to the early-day motion.
Have you had much response,
or help, from the hacker community?
I never really mixed with the hacker community, if you
can call them that. In fact, after all of this happened
back in 2002, some of them contacted me but they are
not really hackers. In fact they are all professionals,
but they used to hack, and they are very good and they
are a knowledgeable lot. Some know about the law, some
know forensic computing, and there has been a good bit
of support there. In fact, the Free Gary Web site came
from one of those people.
A Web site you are not allowed
to use, of course, because of your bail conditions?
Right, I have to collect printouts of my emails and
stuff. Which is silly as I have been free to use the
Internet for three years, although I haven't actually
had my own Internet account.
Cockamamie. No other
way to describe it. The Boston
Herald tells us the “terrorists” (possible
patsies) in London “were all carrying personal documents”
because “they wanted their identities to be known,”
according to the Times of London. You’d think if
this was indeed the case the “terrorists”
(patsies) would have sent a statement to the newspapers,
put a message on the internet, done something to leave
a mark. Nope. Instead they left behind their IDs and such.
Now a normal person would have big problems with this
scenario, mostly because any documents on the bodies of
the alleged suicide bombers would be incinerated or blown
to smithereens. But miraculously, like Mohammed Atta’s
passport found in the smoldering rubble of the WTC (and
in nearly pristine condition), the “personal documents”
of the native-born Pakistani heritage suicide bombers
were found in the wreckage. It’s sort of like the
Magic Bullet found on a stretcher at Parkland Hospital
shortly after the assassination of President Kennedy.
Point is, if people are stupid enough—or intellectually
lazy enough—to believe this obvious nonsense they
probably deserve what the neocon world order has in mind
for them: a repressive police state, endless war (donating
of first born will be mandatory), and an ever sliding
standard of living as the neolibs take over the planet
and turn it into a cheap labor gulag.
Sky News
Last Updated: 07:56 UK, Thursday July 14, 2005
One of the bombers
who brought carnage to London taught disabled children,
it has emerged.
Mohammed Sadique Khan, 30, of Dewsbury, was a supply
teaching assistant who taught disabled children in Beeston,
it has been revealed.
A picture of him carried on the front page of The Times
shows the bearded bomber caring for young children at
the school.
The news came as police told Sky News they were hunting
a fifth man involved in the plot to kill 52 people in
Britain's first suicide strikes.
Sky News' crime correspondent Martin
Brunt said: "Police have to assume that there were
others working with these four."
The Times reported that the mastermind of the attacks
was a Pakistani in his 30s who arrived through a British
port last month but left a day before the bombings.
Detectives are piecing together the lives of the suicide
bombers - four home-grown young men.
Three of the four bombers are believed to be Shehzad
Tanweer, 22, of Leeds, Mohammed Sadique Khan, 30, of
Dewsbury, and Hasib Hussain, 19, of Leeds.
A fourth man from Yorkshire has been identified by
police but not yet named.
He is believed to have been on the train which was
devastated near Russell Square Tube station and is thought
to be a friend of the other three suspects.
Bashir Ahmed, 65, the uncle of Shehzad Tanweer, said:
"The family is shattered. This is a terrible thing."
Mr Ahmed said it was hard for the
family to accept their son had caused such loss of life,
adding: "It wasn't him. It must have been forces
behind him."
Meanwhile, police have raided homes in Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire.
Brunt said police had received a tip-off that they
might find explosives in a home.
In other related news:
:: Italy has arrested and is questioning 174 Islamic
extremists.
:: It is thought that the explosives originated in
the Balkans, where it is possible to buy the material
on the black market after the Balkan wars.
:: The entire European Union will hold two minutes'
silence at noon tomorrow in response to last week's
London terror attacks.
:: Security services fear there could still be a second
suicide bomb team waiting to strike and that any al
Qaeda mastermind may have already fled the country.
:: Police are now focusing efforts on Leeds, where
homes have been raided, and Luton, where two cars thought
to have been used by the suspects were found.
:: A house being searched by police in Leeds was being
used as an operational base for the suspected bombers,
according to a local MP.
:: One of the men had been reported missing by his
mother after the attacks, apparently worried he may
have been caught in the tragedy.
:: Friends of another man said he had travelled to
Afghanistan and Pakistan within the last six months,
prompting fears he may have attended an al Qaeda training
camp.
:: A relative of one of the men was arrested in West
Yorkshire and is being quizzed by the anti-terrorist
branch after police were given more time to question
him "on suspicion of the commission, instigation
or preperation of acts of Terrorism under the Terrorism
Act 2000".
Tony Blair put his own people at risk in the service of
a foreign power
Seumas Milne
The Guardian
Thursday July 14, 2005
In the grim days since last week's
bombing of London, the bulk of Britain's political class
and media has distinguished itself by a wilful and dangerous
refusal to face up to reality. Just
as it was branded unpatriotic in the US after the 2001
attacks on New York and Washington to talk about the
link with American policy in the Middle East, so those
who have raised the evident connection between the London
atrocities and Britain's role in Iraq and Afghanistan
have been denounced as traitors. And anyone who
has questioned Tony Blair's echo of George Bush's fateful
words on September 11 that this was an assault on freedom
and our way of life has been treated as an apologist
for terror.
But while some allowance could be made in the American
case for the shock of the attacks, the London bombings
were one of the most heavily trailed events in modern
British history. We have been told repeatedly since
the prime minister signed up to Bush's war on terror
that an attack on Britain was a certainty - and have
had every opportunity to work out why that might be.
Throughout the Afghan and Iraq wars, there has been
a string of authoritative warnings about the certain
boost it would give to al-Qaida-style terror groups.
The only surprise was that the attacks were so long
coming.
But when the newly elected Respect MP George Galloway
- who might be thought to have some locus on the subject,
having overturned a substantial New Labour majority
over Iraq in a London constituency with a large Muslim
population - declared that Londoners had paid the price
of a "despicable act" for the government's
failure to heed those warnings, he was accused by defence
minister Adam Ingram of "dipping his poisonous
tongue in a pool of blood". Yesterday, the Liberal
Democrat leader Charles Kennedy was in the dock for
a far more tentative attempt to question this suffocating
consensus. Even Ken Livingstone,
who had himself warned of the danger posed to London
by an invasion of Iraq, has now claimed the bombings
were nothing to do with the war - something he clearly
does not believe.
A week on from the London outrage, this official otherworldliness
is once again in full flood, as ministers and commentators
express astonishment that cricket-playing British-born
Muslims from suburbia could have become suicide bombers,
while Blair blames an "evil ideology". The
truth is that no amount of condemnation of evil and
self-righteous resoluteness will stop terror attacks
in the future. Respect for the
victims of such atrocities is supposed to preclude open
discussion of their causes in the aftermath - but that
is precisely when honest debate is most needed.
The wall of silence in the US after the much greater
carnage of 9/11 allowed the Bush administration to set
a course that has been a global disaster. And there
is little sense in London that the official attitude
reflects the more uncertain mood on the streets. There
is every need for the kind of public mourning that will
take place in London today, along with concerted action
to halt the backlash against Muslim Britons that claimed
its first life in Nottingham at the weekend. But
it is an insult to the dead to mislead people about
the crucial factors fuelling this deadly rage in Muslim
communities across the world.
The first piece of disinformation long peddled by champions
of the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan is that al-Qaida
and its supporters have no demands that could possibly
be met or negotiated over; that they are really motivated
by a hatred of western freedoms and way of life; and
that their Islamist ideology aims at global domination.
The reality was neatly summed up this week in a radio
exchange between the BBC's political editor, Andrew
Marr, and its security correspondent, Frank Gardner,
who was left disabled by an al-Qaida attack in Saudi
Arabia last year. Was it the "very diversity, that
melting pot aspect of London" that Islamist extremists
found so offensive that they wanted to kill innocent
civilians in Britain's capital, Marr wondered. "No,
it's not that," replied Gardner briskly, who is
better acquainted with al-Qaida thinking than most.
"What they find offensive are the policies of western
governments and specifically the presence of western
troops in Muslim lands, notably Iraq and Afghanistan."
The central goal of the al-Qaida-inspired campaign,
as its statements have regularly spelled out, is the
withdrawal of US and other western forces from the Arab
and Muslim world, an end to support for Israeli occupation
of Palestinian land and a halt to support for oil-lubricated
despots throughout the region. Those are also goals
that unite an overwhelming majority of Muslims in the
Middle East and elsewhere and give al-Qaida and its
allies the chance to recruit and operate - in a way
that their extreme religious conservatism or dreams
of restoring the medieval caliphate never would. As
even Osama bin Laden asked in his US election-timed
video: if it was western freedom al-Qaida hated, "Why
do we not strike Sweden?"
The second disinformation line peddled by government
supporters since last week's bombings is that the London
attacks had nothing to do with Iraq. The Labour MP Tony
Wright insisted that such an idea was "not only
nonsense, but dangerous nonsense". Blair has argued
that, since the 9/11 attacks predated the Iraq war,
outrage at the aggression could not have been the trigger.
It's perfectly true that Muslim anger over Palestine,
western-backed dictatorships and the aftermath of the
1991 war against Iraq - US troops in Arabia and a murderous
sanctions regime against Iraq - was already intense
before 2001 and fuelled al-Qaida's campaign in the 1990s.
But that was aimed at the US,
not Britain, which only became a target when Blair backed
Bush's war on terror.Afghanistan
made a terror attack on Britain a likelihood; Iraq made
it a certainty.
We can't of course be sure of the exact balance of
motivations that drove four young suicide bombers to
strike last Thursday, but we can be certain that the
bloodbath unleashed by Bush and Blair in Iraq - where
a 7/7 takes place every day - was at the very least
one of them. What they did was not "home grown",
but driven by a worldwide anger at US-led domination
and occupation of Muslim countries.
The London bombers were to blame for attacks on civilians
that are neither morally nor politically defensible.
But the prime minister - who was
warned by British intelligence of the risks in the run-up
to the war - is also responsible for knowingly putting
his own people at risk in the service of a foreign power.
The security crackdowns and campaign to uproot an "evil
ideology" the government announced yesterday will
not extinguish the threat. Only
a British commitment to end its role in the bloody occupations
of Iraq and Afghanistan is likely to do that.
By NICK WADHAMS
Associated Press
Wed Jul 13, 9:37 PM ET
UNITED NATIONS - The United States
on Wednesday moved to strengthen U.N. sanctions against
al-Qaida and the Taliban, circulating a draft resolution
that would spell out in far greater detail those who
could be punished.
U.N. sanctions currently require all 191 U.N. member
states to impose a travel ban and arms embargo against
those "associated with"
Osama bin Laden's terror network and the former Afghan
rulers and to freeze their financial assets.
The resolution dedicates almost half a page to better
defining those groups and individuals who should fall
under the sanctions regime. Among
other things, they would include those who helped finance,
plan or otherwise support al-Qaida, bin Laden, the Taliban
"or any cell, affiliate, splinter group or derivative
thereof."
"We felt it was important to clarify who was covered
by the definition of 'those associated with Osama ban
Laden, al-Qaida and the Taliban,'" U.S. mission
spokesman Richard Grenell said.
Grenell said the definition will help close loopholes
that have allowed some terror suspects to go unpunished.
It's hard to say when the resolution will come up for
a vote; it could be a few days or as much as a couple
of weeks.
Earlier this year, a U.N. team investigating compliance
with the sanctions against al-Qaida and the Taliban
found that bin Laden's followers still have easy access
to bombmaking materials and money.
The report also noted that no member state reported
a violation of the travel ban for the three years the
sanctions had been in force - but it was "difficult
to believe" no al-Qaida or Taliban member had crossed
a national border.
The U.S. draft resolution would also
set up a monitoring team to assess national efforts
to implement sanctions against al-Qaida and the Taliban.
The team would also help come up with ways to punish
countries that willingly ignore the sanctions.
Third, the resolution would also share more information
with two other U.N. committees: one that focuses on
counterterrorism and one that deals with nuclear nonproliferation.
It would also ask that the list of those under sanction
be included in an Interpol database.
Comment: In
other words, the US wants to change the rules so that
when US leaders claim that some individual or group
is associated with "al-Qaeda", the world will
actually believe them. To make sure that other nations
play along, a monitoring team will regularly check up
on each country's efforts to pretend that "al-Qaeda"
is real, and that the "evildoers" (read: normal
folks like you and me) are "brought to justice"
(read: tortured, detained indefinitely, and/or killed).
By Debra Erdley and Betsy Hiel
Thursday, July 14, 2005
ALEXANDRIA, Va. --
Saying his words steered young
men into terrorist training camps that are the lifeblood
of a movement that plants bombs on subways and trains,
Judge Leonie M. Brinkema sentenced an American Islamic
scholar to life in prison Wednesday.
Ali al-Timimi, 42, of Fairfax, Va., who had ties to a
now-defunct Pittsburgh-based magazine that advocated holy
war, was convicted in a lengthy jury trial in federal
court here last spring of recruiting a group of northern
Virginia men to travel to Pakistan and train to take up
arms for the Taliban. The men, who played paintball and
went to shooting ranges to train for holy war, were dubbed
the Virginia Paintball Jihad.
Before the trial, nine of al-Timimi's followers were
convicted or pleaded guilty in the conspiracy prosecutors
said grew in the shadow of the nation's capital in the
days before 9/11 and blossomed on al-Timimi's advice in
the week after the terrorist attacks.
Al-Timimi's conviction for soliciting
treason and other charges marked the first post-9/11 trial
in which the government won a terrorism verdict for actions
tied to words designed to aid the enemy, rather than actual
deeds such as providing money, equipment or engaging in
combat.
Al-Timimi's name surfaced in Pittsburgh more than a
decade ago. A scholar with an international following
whose lectures still are sold on tape here and in England,
al-Timimi was listed as a member of the advisory board
of Assirat al-Mustaqeem, a militant Arabic language magazine
that was published in Pittsburgh from 1991 through 2000.
Al-Timimi's attorneys, Edward MacMahon
and Alan Yamamoto, characterized the scholar, who recently
received a doctorate for work related to cancer research,
as a gentle man of peace who had never been convicted
of a crime or owned a weapon. They said he did nothing
more than advise the young men to seek out a nation where
they could practice Islam in safety.
They vowed to appeal the verdict, charging it was based
on an anti-Muslim bias fueled by the unpopular sentiments
on 10-year-old tapes of al-Timimi's lectures on Islam.
Brinkema took issue with those claims.
"This was not a case about speech. This was a case
about intent. ... The real issue in this case was what
the defendant intended by his speech," she said.
Brinkema said that prosecutor Gordon Kromberg specifically
told jurors al-Timimi's sentiments did not represent Islam,
but rather the beliefs of a small group within the faith.
She said testimony about a closed-door meeting between
al-Timimi and his followers five days after 9/11 in which
witnesses said al-Timimi urged them to aid the Taliban
strongly supported the government's contention that there
was indeed a scheme to aid the enemy.
Moreover, she said there is little argument that schools
in Pakistan are used to "train people to go into
subways, train stations and buildings and kill a great
number of people."
Al-Timimi, who remained silent during his lengthy trial,
told Brinkema yesterday he is innocent. He read a six-page
statement, reciting the preamble to the U.S. Constitution
and likening his trial to that of Aaron Burr, who served
as vice president under Thomas Jefferson and was later
tried and acquitted of treason. Finally, he compared himself
to Socrates.
"I too like Socrates am accused and found guilty
of nothing more than corrupting the youth and practicing
a different religion than that of the majority,"
al-Timimi said. "Socrates was mercifully given a
cup of hemlock. I was handed a life sentence."
As several women in head scarves, seated among his supporters,
wiped tears from their eyes, the burly scholar, dressed
in a business suit, identified himself as a prisoner of
conscience and sat down.
Like Brinkema and the prosecutors, Evan Kohlman, a New
York-based terrorism researcher and analyst who testified
as an expert for the government, said the case had nothing
to do with Islam.
"It has to do with a guy who incited a group of
impressionable young people to go abroad to a terrorist
training camp and get terrorist training in order to kill
and maim civilians," Kohlman said yesterday.
None of al-Timimi's followers ever made it to Afghanistan.
Several did leave the United States and train in terrorist
camps in the mountains of Pakistan. They found themselves
marooned there when the nation's mountain border with
Afghanistan was closed as American soldiers routed the
Taliban.
Brinkema conceded that life without parole for al-Timimi's
seemingly removed role in the scheme might seem harsh,
but said it's mandatory on one of the charges in his 10-count
conviction, a weapons charge. The longest single sentence
any of the other charges carried was 30 years in prison.
Reactions to the sentence were mixed among legal and
civil rights experts.
Jeffrey Addicott, director of the Center for Terrorism
Law at St. Mary's University Law School in San Antonio,
Texas, applauded prosecutors.
"The government has to have the ability to pierce
the veil of religion and get to what these guys are advocating,
and that's murder, and that is not protected speech,"
Addicott said.
"This is a tragedy for all of us because it brought
into question the sanctity of the First Amendment,"
said El-Hajj Mauri Sallakhan, of the Maryland-based Peace
and Justice Foundation, an Islamic human rights organization
David Cole, a professor at the Georgetown University
Law Center, characterized al-Timimi's sentence as overly
harsh and said the case raises questions about the violation
of First Amendment free speech rights.
Comment:
The police state has just moved up another notch. This
first case establishes a precedent. The teacher had students
who went to Pakistan, and "we all know about Pakistan".
There are other American soldiers of fortune who go off
and fight for hire as soldiers of fortune. As there is
no Islamic teacher guiding them, and they work for money,
not religious ideology, the state leaves them alone. Hey,
the state hires them!
But make no mistake, if it starts here, it will move
to other cases where it will be the words alone that the
authorities will say "comforted the enemy".
By SAM CAGE
Associated Press
Tue Jul 12, 9:01 PM ET
GENEVA - Uzbekistan's security
forces gave no warning before opening fire on demonstrators
in May in an eastern city, the
United Nations said Tuesday, citing testimony of witnesses.
It demanded an international inquiry
into "what amounted to a mass killing."
Uzbek opposition groups and human rights activists
claim more than 700 people - mostly unarmed civilians
- were killed on May 13 in Andijan. Uzbek authorities
say fewer than 200 died and deny that government troops
fired on unarmed civilians.
The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise
Arbour, reiterated a call for an independent investigation,
and said the probe should establish what happened to
the bodies.
"Grave human rights violations, mostly of the
right to life, were committed by Uzbek military and
security forces," the office of the High Commissioner
said in a report compiled after a mission to neighboring
Kyrgyzstan.
Uzbek forces did not try to use nonviolent methods
before resorting to firearms, and failed to give a clear
warning of their intent to fire, the report said.
"It is not excluded - as it was described by eyewitnesses
interviewed - that the incidents amounted to a mass
killing," the report said. [...]
Uzbek President Islam Karimov has blamed the violence
on Islamic militants and rejected U.S. and other Western
calls for an independent international inquiry.
In Washington, a State Department
spokesman said the U.N. report added to other credible
witness accounts of the shootings.
"Certainly the Uzbekistan government owes its
citizens and owes the international community a serious,
credible and independent investigation of these events,"
said the spokesman, Tom Casey.
The report also said there was
urgent need for neighboring countries to halt deportations
of Uzbek asylum seekers and Andijan witnesses back to
their home, saying they would face the risk of torture
if returned to Uzbekistan. [...]
WASHINGTON - President Bush's personal
credibility appears to be eroding at a time when Iraq
has become the top public priority and the White House
is engulfed in controversy over senior Bush adviser
Karl Rove, a poll released on Wednesday suggested.
The NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll showed the
percentage of Americans who believe Bush is "honest
and straightforward" fell to 41 percent from 50
percent in January, while those who say they doubt his
veracity climbed to 45 percent from 36 percent.
The telephone survey, which was conducted July 8-11
and included responses from 1,009 adults, also showed
that Iraq has replaced jobs as
the leading issue among Americans.
With a 3.1 percent margin of error, polling data said
40 percent see Iraq as the top priority for the United
States, against 34 percent who view jobs as their main
concern. In January, jobs ranked highest among 46 percent
to 39 percent for Iraq.
The new poll also showed Bush's overall
job approval rating slipping to 46 percent from 47 percent
in May, while his disapproval rating crept upward to
49 percent from 47 percent.
The White House this week has been reeling amid controversy
over Rove, the top Bush political adviser who was named
by a Time magazine reporter as one of the sources who
identified
CIA agent Valerie Plame to the media in 2003.
Democrats have called on Bush to fire Rove or block
his access to classified information. But Bush, who
originally pledged to dismiss anyone responsible for
leaking Plame's identity, said he will withhold judgment
on his deputy chief of staff for now.
Comment: We
always take polls with a grain of salt, but we just
had to include this one. Remember what happened the
last time that Bush's approval ratings were low? Here's
a hint: 9/11.
A team of Senate and House Democrats
today are planning to introduce legislation today aimed
at significantly increasing the size of the U.S. Army.
Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-Conn.), ranking member of
the Senate Armed Services (SASC) airland subcommittee,
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), a SASC member,
and Reps. Ellen Tauscher (D-Calif.) and Mark Udall (D-Colo.),
both members of the House Armed Services committee,
are pressing for the passage of the United States Army
Relief Act.
The legislation seeks to raise the cap of the Army's
end strength, said an aide to Tauscher.
The Army already is working on increasing its troop
levels by 30,000. Army chief of staff, Gen. Peter Schoomaker,
has said on numerous occasions that it costs about $1.2
billion a year for every 10,000 people added to the
Army.
Both the House and the Senate
have called for an increase in troop levels in their
2006 defense authorization bill and it is likely that
troop levels will be increased when the conferees meet.
Comment: Given
the difficulty the military is having meeting current
recruiting goals, where do they think the armed forces
will find new cannon fodder? Another "terrorist"
attack? The return of the draft??
By Dale Russakoff
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, June 13, 2005; Page A01
Ellen Saracini lost her husband,
United Airlines Capt. Victor J. Saracini, when his Flight
175 crashed into the World Trade Center on Sept. 11,
2001. Now she stands to lose more than half of her widow's
pension in a very different kind of crash -- United's
default of its $9 billion pension obligations.
The scale of the default, the
largest in U.S. history, has received more attention
than the toll on the lives of the bankrupt airline's
120,000 employees and pensioners. Saracini discussed
its impact on her and her two daughters in an interview
yesterday, saying she hopes her story will help shift
the focus to the laws and policies that allow such defaults.
"My own situation is not a crisis -- I have my
husband's life insurance to keep us secure in our house,"
she said from her home in Yardley, Pa. "But a lot
of other people have real hardship -- medical costs
they won't be able to afford, houses they won't be able
to keep. If I can help draw attention to them, I'll
do it in a heartbeat."
Saracini was among about 2,000 United pensioners and
employees who e-mailed their stories to Rep. George
Miller (D-Calif.) in recent days for what he called
an online hearing on the human impact of the default.
"We have been overwhelmed -- both numerically and
emotionally -- by the response," said Miller, one
of several politicians in both parties warning that
a wider crisis will loom if the nation's pension security
laws are not revised.
More than 20 other companies have defaulted on pension
funds of more than $100 million in the past three years,
and last week, executives of troubled Delta and Northwest
airlines said they may be next. Miller has proposed
a six-month moratorium on defaults, as Congress debates
how to fix what many lawmakers call "broken"
pension protection laws.
"Like Enron, workers' lives and retirements have
been ruined," Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa)
said last week. "But unfortunately, this time it's
perfectly legal."
In e-mails to Miller that his staff
is posting online, and in interviews, United retirees
recounted stories of job-hunting in their sixties and
seventies, facing medical costs they no longer can afford,
uprooting families to move to lower-cost communities,
selling dream retirement homes and losing money they
had counted on to support elderly parents.
The Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp. (PBGC), the federal
insurance program that faces its own solvency crisis
and is to take over the United pensions, ensures a maximum
of $45,000 a year in benefits for those who retired
at 65, but considerably less for those who retired younger
-- much as Social Security pays less to early retirees.
This particularly hurts pilots, whom the law requires
to retire from major airlines at 60 and who now collect
as much as $125,000 a year in pensions, depending on
length of service. The PBGC's
maximum coverage for those who retire at 60 is $28,000
-- a cut of 50 to 75 percent for pilots. Saracini
will receive even less because her husband was 51 when
he was killed.
The PBGC limits cover full pensions for most United
retirees, but those still working will have their pensions
frozen, meaning they will accrue no more benefits and
will have less money for retirement than they had counted
on -- in some cases, much less.
Dale Cassady, a flight attendant for 32 years who lives
in Arlington, wrote to Miller that she exhausted most
of her savings putting her daughter through college
and now will have to take in a boarder to be able to
pay her mortgage and property taxes. Floyd Channell,
72, a retired United ramp worker at Dulles International
Airport, said he worries how today's workers will fare
in old age with even smaller pensions than his. Although
PBGC probably will protect his full benefit, he said
he needs one-third of it just to pay medical costs --
beyond what Medicare covers -- for his wife, who has
disabling back pain. He has taken
a part-time job at a church, "but when you're 72,
you can't get much," he said.
For pilots, the six-figure drop
in pension benefits follows losses of tens and even
hundreds of thousands of dollars in United stock they
received in the 1990s in exchange for major pay and
benefit concessions -- and were required to hold until
retirement, as the stock plummeted in value.
Other employees lost stock as well, but had less to
lose.
"I call it legalized crime," said United
pilot Klaus Meyer, 47, of Bethlehem, Pa. "I lost
almost all my United stock value in the bankruptcy,
and here's another part of the retirement I was promised
that is gone. And now my Social
Security is at risk. Where does it all end? You
feel brutalized by the system."
Meyer agreed to be interviewed despite warnings from
the pilots' union that United may penalize employees
who talk to reporters. "What are they going to
do to me -- cut my pension in half?" he said.
Retired pilots nationwide who spent their work lives
expecting six-figure pensions told of scrambling to
downsize as fast as possible. "The last thing I
thought was that I would depend on Social Security as
the cornerstone of my retirement," John J. Pinto,
60, of Annapolis, wrote to Miller. Pinto said he is
job-hunting, and has found that he and his wife, a schoolteacher,
probably will earn together less than a fourth of his
pay as a pilot.
In the late 1990s, United pilot Gerald Innella had
$500,000 in United stock and a promised $110,000 pension
for life. His children grown, he and his wife built
a "dream home" on a golf course in Somerset
County, N.J. His stock sold at $10,000 in the bankruptcy,
and his pension stands to drop almost $80,000 a year.
Innella, now 60, and his wife recently sold the dream
home, moving in first with their son and now a niece.
Interviewed at his niece's home in Glen Gardner, N.J.,
Innella was preparing for a pre-dawn flight to Antigua;
he is back at work as a full-time charter pilot at one-third
of his former salary.
Last week, United Chief Executive
Officer Glenn Tilton testified to the Senate Finance
Committee about $4.5 million he is receiving from United
to replace benefits he had accrued over a 32-year career
at Texaco, his previous employer. Tilton said that the
default will not affect the payment, and that he has
$1.5 million left to collect. He said this does not
represent a double standard because United promised
him the money in his contract.
"He is saying, 'United guaranteed that to me,'
" said retired pilot John D. Clark of Charlottesville,
who flew United planes for 36 years out of Dulles and
whose $125,000 annual pension is to be reduced by more
than 70 percent. "Why is
the promise made to him understandable, and the one
made to me can go by the wayside?"
Clark said he is more enraged at the injustice of the
pension default than at his own situation. "The
company is at fault, the Congress is at fault, the president
is at fault, past presidents are at fault. There's plenty
of fault to go around, but we live in a time when nobody
takes responsibility," he said. [...]
By KEITH BRADSHER
The New York Times
July 14, 2005
PARIS - A sudden and mysterious
drop in China's oil consumption helped to push down
the International Energy Agency's estimate on Wednesday
of global demand for this year.
After growing 11 percent in 2003 and 15.4 percent last
year, China's overall oil use
declined 1 percent in the second quarter from the comparable
quarter a year earlier, the agency said.
The drop is the latest in a series of unclear and often
conflicting indications about whether the Chinese economy
is still growing strongly. Top officials of the agency
said in interviews they believed that the decline was
temporary and that they expected Chinese demand to rebound
in the second half of the year, but added that world
oil prices could take a heavy blow if Chinese use did
not increase.
The International Energy Agency, supported by the governments
of the world's leading consuming nations, has recently
become known for warning that the world does not have
enough oil and calling for the Organization of the Petroleum
Exporting Countries to push its member countries to
increase their output. But William C. Ramsay, the agency's
deputy executive director, said Wednesday that there
were signs that worldwide production capacity was starting
to move ahead of demand for the year, and he expressed
surprise that oil prices had nonetheless stayed high.
[...]
While many traders have expressed concern about China's
announcement a week ago that it was close to completing
the first of three oil tank farms for a strategic reserve,
Mr. Ramsay said he doubted that Chinese officials would
opt to fill the reserve quickly as long as oil remained
around $60 a barrel. [In New York on Wednesday, oil
for August delivery declined 61 cents, settling at $60.01
a barrel.]
China's strong demand for energy has helped push Cnooc,
one of its leading oil companies, to make an $18.5 billion
proposal to acquire Unocal of California.
Officials of the International Energy Agency said there
were four possible explanations for China's drop in
oil demand in the second quarter, the most probable
being that this was a temporary decrease. The
most likely cause, said Fatih Birol, the agency's chief
economist and head of economic analysis, was that China
had not been allowing the domestic price of electricity
and many refined products, like gasoline and diesel
fuel, to rise nearly as quickly as world prices.
This has caused power-generating concerns and service
stations to sell less electricity, and less gasoline
and diesel fuel, so as to limit their losses.
Many Chinese power stations have stopped burning fuel
oil to produce electricity because the prices they are
allowed to charge per kilowatt are not high enough to
cover the cost of importing fuel. Chinese refiners have
been selling part of their output overseas at higher
prices than they can get in the highly regulated domestic
market - where gasoline, for example, now sells for
$1.63 a gallon.
China's consumption of fuel, a portion of overall oil
consumption, plunged 19 percent in the second quarter
from a year earlier, said Jeff Brown, an oil-demand
analyst here, while growth in refined fuel consumption
slowed to a crawl.
Mr. Birol said that artificial energy
shortages caused by distorted prices were the most likely
basis for the curtailed availability of fuel, especially
diesel.
But while diesel-fuel shortages and lines of trucks
at empty service stations were a visible problem in
China in April, they were not evident during trips over
the last three weeks through southern China and to Beijing,
and there has been little talk of continuing shortages
in news media on the mainland or in Hong Kong.
When told this, Mr. Birol said there
had been a vigorous debate in the last two days within
the International Energy Agency over how to explain
the decline in Chinese consumption, and he acknowledged
that other, longer-term explanations were possible.
These include the possibility
that the overall Chinese economy is starting to slow,
that China is generating more
of its electricity from coal instead of oil,
and that China is improving energy conservation in response
to high prices.
Economic statistics have been contradictory. Exports
are still growing rapidly. But energy-intensive production
of steel, cement and other construction material has
started to slow as the government cracked down on real
estate speculation.
In the last year, China has considerably
expanded the production capacity of its coal mines and,
just as important, the capacity of its railroad system
to haul coal to markets. It has also exhorted businesses
and households to use less energy, through steps like
setting thermostats higher so air-conditioning systems
do not have to work as hard.
Comment: The
combination of increased reliance on coal-fired power
plants, an increase in coal mine productivity, and energy
conservation efforts by the public during the past year
would certainly explain the 1% drop in oil consumption
during that time period.
Common use of drugs to improve the mind poses ethical
challenge
Alok Jha, science correspondent
The Guardian
Thursday July 14, 2005
Can't remember phone numbers, worried
about an upcoming exam or desperately want to give up
smoking? In future, the answer will be simple: just
pop a pill.
The idea that an array of easily available and addiction-free
drugs could be used to improve memory or increase intelligence
is the stuff of science fiction dystopia - in Brave
New World, Aldous Huxley created a whole planet under
the spell of a pleasure drug called Soma.
But a new report by leading scientists in the fields
of psychology and neuroscience argues that, very soon,
there really will be a pill for every ill.
"It is possible that [advances] could usher in
a new era of drug use without addiction," said
the report by Foresight, the government's science-based
thinktank.
"In a world that is increasingly
non-stop and competitive, the individual's use of such
substances may move from the fringe to the norm."
However, the report said the widespread adoption of
new brain-enhancing drugs was not without risks and
would raise "significant ethical, social and practical
issues."
Drugs that work on the brain are already common - many
people can hardly begin their days without the mind-sharpening
effects of caffeine or nicotine.
Launching the report yesterday, the government's chief
scientific adviser, Sir David King, said that brain-enhancing
drugs developed to treat diseases such as Alzheimer's
were likely to find increased use among healthy people
looking to improve their perception, memory, planning
or judgment.
Ritalin, prescribed to children
with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, is sometimes
used by healthy people to enhance their mental performance.
Modafinil, a drug developed to treat narcolepsy,
has been shown to reduce impulsiveness and help people
focus on problems.
"It improves working memory - your ability to
remember telephone numbers - it gives you an extra digit
or two," said Trevor Robbins, an experimental psychologist
at Cambridge University and an author of the Foresight
report.
"It also improves your planning when you're doing
complex, chess-like problems. It makes you more reflective
about a problem: you take a bit longer but you get it
right."
Modafinil has already been used
by the US military to keep soldiers awake and alert
and some scientists are considering its usefulness in
helping shift workers deal with erratic working hours.
It has also been tested for cocaine users. "It
produces some of the subjective effects of cocaine without
the chronic dependence," said Prof Robbins. Other
drugs are being touted as "vaccinations" against
substances such as nicotine, alcohol and cocaine. The
treatment would work by causing the immune system to
produce antibodies against the drug being abused - these
antibodies would render the drug impotent when taken
and prevent it from having any effect on the brain.
"How [the vaccinations are] used depends on clinical
judgments," said Prof Robbins. "Informed consent
is important."
But he cautioned against any plan
to pre-vaccinate people against narcotics. "One
would be very careful indeed about trying to sign one's
children up for such treatment," he said. "That,
to me, sounds reprehensible."
In the long term, drugs that can delete
painful memories could also be used routinely. "We
are now looking 20-25 years ahead," said Prof Robbins.
"Very basic science is showing that it is possible
to call up a memory, knock it on the head and produce
selective amnesia."
That has obvious uses for people
suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder,
but there is also the tantalising possibility that it
could be used to treat harmful addictions.
"Drug addiction can be understood very much as
an aberrant learning process," said Prof Robbins.
"Many of these drugs hijack the learning processes
of the brain and produce aberrant habits, which dominate
behaviour.
"Clearly the possibility exists that you can call
up a drugrelated memory and produce amnesia for it,
thus removing craving for that particular drug."
As drug research improves, the harmful effects of today's
recreational drugs could even be engineered out. [...]
On the menu: range of treatments
- Ritalin (methylphenidate) is used by a small number
of students in an attempt to improve exam results and
by business people to improve performance in the boardroom
- D-amphetamine also improves memory but only for people
of a certain genetic make-up
- Rimonabant is used as an antidote to the intoxicant
effects of cannabis and a treatment for heroin relapse.
But it is sometimes also used to enhance the high produced
by these drugs by reducing their side-effects
- Naltrexone is already used to treat chronic alcoholism
and narcotic abuse. It works by blocking the pleasure
receptors that are normally activated in the brain when
people use the drugs
- Propranolol, a beta-blocker, is used to treat high
blood pressure, angina, and abnormal heart rhythms.
It is also used sometimes by snooker players to calm
their nerves
- Modafinil, a stimulant developed to treat narcolepsy,
has been used by soldiers to improve memory and judgment.
It is also used in treatment of cocaine addiction
Comment: Yes
indeedy, the pharmaceutical companies have big plans
for your brain. Can't concentrate? Pop a pill! Nervous
about terror attacks? Pop a pill! Experiencing PTSD
from killing "terrorists" in Iraq? There's
a pill for that, too!!
Eventually it will get to the point where our brains
are filled with more artificial than natural chemicals.
What seems to be missing in this article is a discussion
of the brain's own ability to produce all the "drugs"
it needs. Popping more pills to deal with our more difficult
moments is a wonderful way to absolve ourselves of any
responsibility for our actions - or to take the easy
way out instead of allowing ourselves to suffer a bit
and grow from the experience. Think about it: A pill
that wipes bad memories from our minds?!
"Barbara, I know you're sad because Little Johnny
was taken away by the NSS, but I have the perfect solution:
just take this little government-issued blue pill and
you'll forget you ever had a son!!"
By Jo Twist
BBC News science and technology reporter
Tuesday, 12 July, 2005, 16:44 GMT 17:44 UK
Scientist Professor Richard Dawkins
has opened a global conference of big thinkers warning
that our Universe may be just "too queer"
to understand.
Professor Dawkins, the renowned Selfish Gene author
from Oxford University, said we were living in a "middle
world" reality that we have created.
Experts in design, technology, and entertainment have
gathered in Oxford to share their ideas about our futures.
TED (Technology, Entertainment and Design) is already
a top US event.
It is the first time the event, TED Global, has been
held in Europe.
Species software
Professor Dawkins' opening talk, in a session called
Meme Power, explored the ways in which humans invent
their own realities to make sense of the infinitely
complex worlds they are in; worlds made more complex
by ideas such as quantum physics which is beyond most
human understanding.
"Are there things about the Universe that will
be forever beyond our grasp, in principle, ungraspable
in any mind, however superior?" he asked.
"Successive generations have come to terms with
the increasing queerness of the Universe."
Each species, in fact, has a different
"reality". They work with different "software"
to make them feel comfortable, he suggested.
Because different species live in different
models of the world, there was a discomfiting variety
of real worlds, he suggested.
"Middle world is like the narrow range of the
electromagnetic spectrum that we see," he said.
"Middle world is the narrow
range of reality that we judge to be normal as opposed
to the queerness that we judge to be very small or very
large." [...]
Comment: Note
how Dawkins talks about "different realities."
His theory makes it logical for psychopaths
and organic
portals and "souled" humans to occupy
different "realities".
A newly discovered planet has bountiful
sunshine, with not one, not two, but three suns glowing
in its sky.
It is the first extrasolar planet found in a system
with three stars. How a planet was born amidst these
competing gravitational forces will be a challenge for
planet formation theories.
"The environment in which this planet exists is
quite spectacular," said Maciej Konacki from the
California Institute of Technology. "With three
suns, the sky view must be out of this world -- literally
and figuratively."
The triple-star system, HD 188753, is located 149 light-years
away in the constellation Cygnus. The primary star is
like our Sun, weighing 1.06 solar masses. The other
two stars form a tightly bound pair, which is separated
from the primary by approximately the Sun-Saturn distance.
"The pair more or less acts as one star,"
Konacki told SPACE.com.
The combined mass of the close pair is 1.63 solar masses.
Using the 10-meter Keck I telescope in Hawaii, Konacki
noticed evidence for a planet orbiting the primary star.
This newfound gas giant is slightly larger than Jupiter
and whirls around its central star in a 3.5-day orbit.
A planet so close to its star would be very hot.
Although other so-called hot Jupiters have been found
in such close-in orbits, the nearby stellar pair in
HD 188753 likely sheared off much of the planet making
material in the disk that would likely have existed
around the primary star in its youth. Since this proto-planetary
disk holds the construction materials for planets, there
does not appear to be any safe place for this far-off
world to have been assembled. [...]
The Associated Press
Wednesday, July 13, 2005; 4:05 PM
DALLAS -- The body of a Louisiana
man strapped to a gurney fell from the back of a pickup
truck Tuesday onto a south Dallas highway and into the
path of oncoming traffic. "I didn't think it was
possible for that to happen," said Mary Ellen Douglas,
who was driving to work when she saw what she initially
thought was a package that had fallen from a truck.
"I wanted to get out of there. It was too freaky
for me," she said in a story in Wednesday's editions
of The Dallas Morning News.
Authorities said the driver was carrying the body to
a Shreveport, La., funeral home after the man died Monday
at a Mesquite hospital.
"The driver of the truck was not aware that he
had lost the body," Dallas police Lt. Rick Andrews
said. "He saw the open door. He stopped and looked.
He turned around, went back and retraced his steps and
found the body."
Drivers swerved to avoid the corpse and gurney.
Dallas police Senior Cpl. Max Geron said no charges
are expected to be filed.
By Richard Black
BBC News Environment Correspondent
The earthquake which
triggered last December's Asian tsunami caused a rupture
in the ocean floor more than 1,000km long, a new study
reveals.
The finding is based on data gathered from Asian research
stations which used GPS to monitor ground movements.
Scientists say they were surprised that such a large
quake could happen in south-east Asia.
They tell Nature magazine that further studies into the
behaviour of Asian earthquake zones would be prudent.
High accuracy
Over the last few years Christophe Vigny, from the Ecole
Normale Superieure (ENS), has been leading a European
Union-funded project which aims to measure seismic activity
and tectonic movement in south-east Asia.
The idea is to establish research posts whose locations
can be determined to within a few millimetres. By plotting
their positions over a number of years, researchers can
detect how tectonic plates are moving with high accuracy.
Each station in this "Seamerges" programme
monitors several GPS (Global Positioning System) satellites
continuously and updates its position every 30 seconds.
The raw data is processed to compensate for any external
influences, such as disturbances in the atmosphere which
could distort the GPS signal.
Similar systems exist in South America, another earthquake-prone
region.
Dr Vigny is on vacation and uncontactable for interview;
but his colleague Professor Raul Madariaga told the BBC
News website what stations in the Seamerges programme,
and others in Asia, saw in the early hours of 25 December.
'Giant zip'
"It started around Banda Aceh in northern Sumatra,
and spread northwards to the Nicobar Islands," he
said.
"It all happened over a period of about five minutes
- the quake travelled around 3km/s, the sea floor opening
up something like a giant zip."
The biggest displacement was registered in Phuket, Thailand,
where the Earth's crust moved by 27cm; stations thousands
of kilometres away, at Kunming in China, Bangalore and
Hyderabad on the Indian mainland, and even Diego Garcia
in the Indian Ocean, showed displacements of several millimetres.
"This was the biggest earthquake since Chile in
1960," said Professor Madiaraga, "and we don't
know why it was so big.
"People thought earthquakes like this could only
happen in Chile and Alaska; now there's a lot of concern
in Japan about much bigger quakes."
GPS has given seismologists a powerful new tool for investigating
seismic and tectonic movements, and clearly the data generated
in south-east Asia will be of special interest in the
coming months - particularly as another Nature study,
published last month, showed that the threat of a further
serious earthquake and, therefore, a tsunami, remains
very real.
Durban - In just four
minutes, the face of the planet changed forever.
A meteorite the size of a mountain hurtled from outer
space and struck earth some 2020 million years ago, just
south-west of where Johannesburg is today. The whole planet
physically shook under the impact.
South Africans have called this area Vredefort and experts
at the 29th annual World Heritage Committee meeting that
is being held in Durban are expected to award it World
Heritage Site status.
This is the oldest meteor site on the planet, but won't
be the last, warns Wits University Professor of Mineralogy
in the School of Geosciences, Prof Wolf Reimold.
"The impact of large extraterrestrial bodies with
earth is an ever-present danger that humanity has only
recently begun to recognise," said Reimold, who is
the co-author of a new book called Meteorite Impact! The
Danger from Space and South Africa's Mega-Impact: The
Vredefort Structure.
The book explains how Vredefort is teaching a new generation
of scientists around the world about the reality and danger
of similar events in the future.
Three giants stand out
The book also reviews more than 200 000 years of human
habitation in the area, starting with the early San hunters,
whose art survives on the rocks formed during the meteor
strike.
The successive settlements of Sotho-Tswana, Afrikaner
and British farmers are also discussed, including landmark
wars that affected the region over the last three centuries.
The book also provides a guide to more than 20 sites
that highlight the heritage of this area.
Of the 175 impact craters found on the planet so far,
three giants stand out - Chicxulub in Mexico, which wiped
out 75% of life 65-million years ago, Sudbury in Canada,
and Vredefort in South Africa. Each of these events catastrophically
altered the global environment and was strong enough to
drastically change life on our planet.
The Vredefort Impact Structure, with a 300km diameter,
is nearly twice the size of the Chicxulub crater.
The outcroppings around the towns of Vredefort and Parys,
known as the Vredefort Dome, show the scars of the cataclysmic
forces that accompanied the impact event.
The rocks, ripped from the depths of the crust by the
impact, also tell a far older story that stretches back
to more than 3 500 million years ago, when the first continents
formed on the primitive earth, and to the time when fabulous
gold deposits accumulated on the margins of the ancient
Witwatersrand sea.
There are already 788 world heritage sites in 134 countries
in the world.
In South Africa, the sites are Robben Island in the Western
Cape, the Cradle of Humankind that houses the fossil hominid
sites of Sterkfontein, Swartkrans, Kromdraai and environs
in Gauteng and North West, the Greater St Lucia Wetland
Park in KwaZulu-Natal, the uKhahlamba Drakensberg Park
in KwaZulu-Natal, the Mapungubwe Cultural Landscape in
Limpopo and the Cape Floral Region of the Western Cape.