|
The
flame of liberty has died
If
you like music but don't like Bush, then check out the latest
Signs of the Times production, You Lied.
The words are now translated into French, German, Spanish, Italian,
and Portuguese.
A quote from the sign
"We are neither liberal nor conservative, neither
left nor right. We strive to present the news from the
point of view of the Soul. Our concern is how the events
on the planet, not only those within the US, affect our
spiritual evolution"
please tell me how this is helping evolution of spirit
with comments and songs like this by the sign of the times
"If you like music but don't like Bush, then check
out the latest Signs of the Times production, You Lied.
The words are now translated into French, German, Spanish,
Italian, and Portuguese."
All I see is the same finger point and hateful comments
that the bush and his people do. How does this make anyone
better? How does it help us grow?
Is this how we help the spiritual evolution?
Do you think that these type of games are childish?
The truth speaks for itself it does not need childish
comments or games. The truth is harder to see when you
add your games.
We are here for the truth.
s. (United States)
|
The multiple, simultaneous explosions
that took place today on the London transportation system
were the work of perpetrators who had an operational
capacity of considerable scope. They have come a long
way since the two attacks of the year 1998 against the
American embassies in Nairobi and Dar-Es-Salaam, and
the aircraft actions of September 11, 2001.
There was careful planning, intelligence gathering,
and a sophisticated choice of timing as well as near-perfect
execution. We are faced with a deadly and determined
adversary who will stop at nothing and will persevere
as long as he exists as a fighting terrorist force.
One historical irony: I doubt whether
the planners knew that one of the target areas, that
in Russell Square, was within a stone's throw of a building
that served as the first headquarters of the World Zionist
Organization that preceded the State of Israel.
It was at 77 Great Russell Street that Dr. Chaim Weizmann,
a renowned chemist, presided over the effort that culminated
in the issuing of the Balfour Declaration, the first
international recognition of the right of the Jewish
people to a national home in what was then still a part
of the Ottoman Empire.
We are in the throes of a world war, raging over the
entire globe and characterized by the absence of lines
of conflict and an easily identifiable enemy. There
are sometimes long pauses between one attack and another,
consequently creating the wrong impression that the
battle is all over, or at least in the process of being
won.
Generally speaking, the populations at large are not
involved in the conflict, and by and large play the
role of bystanders. But once in a while, these innocents
are caught up in the maelstrom and suffer the most cruel
and wicked of punishments meted out by those who are
not bound by any rules of conduct or any norms of structured
society.
For a while, too short a while, we are engrossed with
the sheer horror of what we see and hear, but, with
the passage of time, our memories fade and we return
to our daily lives, forgetting that the war is still
raging out there and more strikes
are sure to follow.
It cannot be said that seven years after this war broke
out in east Africa, we can see its conclusion. We
are in for the long haul and we must brace ourselves
for more that will follow. The 'Great Wars' of
the 20th century lasted less than this war has already
lasted, and the end is nowhere in sight.
There will be supreme tests
of leadership in this unique situation and people will
have to trust the wisdom and good judgment of those
chosen to govern them. The
executives must be empowered to act resolutely and to
take every measure necessary to protect the citizens
of their country and to carry the combat into whatever
territory the perpetrators and their temporal and spiritual
leaders are inhabiting.
The rules of combat must be rapidly adjusted to cater
to the necessities of this new and unprecedented situation,
and international law must be
rewritten in such a way as to permit civilization to
defend itself. Anything short of this invites
disaster and must not be allowed to happen.
The aim of the enemy is not to defeat western civilization
but to destroy its sources of power and existence, and
to render it a relic of the past. It does not seek a
territorial victory or a regime change; it wants to
turn western civilization into history and will stop
at nothing less than that.
It will show no mercy or compassion and no appreciation
for these noble values when practiced by us. This
does not mean that we can or should assume the norms
of our adversaries, nor that we should act indiscriminately.
It does mean that the only way to ensure our safety
and security will be to obtain the destruction, the
complete destruction, of the enemy.
MUCH HAS been said in recent years about the vital
need for international cooperation. There is no doubt
that this is essential. Yet no
measure of this will suffice and it cannot replace the
requirement that each and every country effectively
declare itself at war with international Islamist terror
and recruit the public to involve itself actively in
the battle, under the direction of the legal powers
that be.
In the past, governments have been expected to provide
security to their citizens. The responsibility is still
there, in principle. But in practice, no government
today can provide an effective 'suit of protection'
for the ordinary citizen. There can be no protection
for every bus, every train, every street, every square.
In these times the ordinary citizen
must be vigilant and must make his personal contribution
to the war effort.
Private enterprise will have to supplement
the national effort in many walks of life.
The measures that I have outlined above will not be
easily adopted
overnight. When the US entered World War Two, Congress
approved the momentous decision by a majority of one
vote. Profound cultural changes
will have to come about and the democratic way of life
will be hard-pressed to produce solutions that will
enable the executive branch to perform its duties and,
at the same time, to preserve the basic tenets of our
democratic way of life. It will not be easy,
but it will be essential not to lose sight of every
one of these necessities.
This war is already one of the longest in modern times;
as things appear now, it is destined to be part of our
daily lives for many years to come, until the enemy
is eliminated, as it surely will be.
The writer, who heads the Center for Strategic
and Policy Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem,
is a former head of the Mossad. |
The near simultaneous
explosions that rocked London today look more like the
handiwork of the Zionist, British intelligence services
rather than the phantom terrorist network, Al-Qaeda.
Just like the attacks on the world trade centre, such
a well planned and executed operation could not have been
the work of a highly decentralised terrorist network.
Such an attack would have taken considerable technical
expertise and large scale planning and communications.
Even the slightest mistake by the alleged perpetrators
would have alerted the security services and every means
at their considerable disposal would have been employed
to foil the operation (Successfully). E-mails and phone
calls would have been intercepted. Secret service agents
in conjunction with London's four and a half million CCTV
cameras would have followed the suspects and tracked their
every move.
The average member of the British public appears on CCTV
three hundred times a day. Radical Islamic groups in particular
are subject to near constant surveillance by the intelligence
services and the planning of such an event would have
been discovered long before its planned execution.
Even the IRA never managed to execute such a complex
terrorist attack on British soil. Not
to mention the fact that MI5 later admitted that it was
members of the intelligence services that planned and
executed the majority of terrorist attacks on British
soil that were blamed on the IRA at the time.
Coming at a time when world leaders are meeting at Gleneagles
for a G8 meeting, less than twenty four hours after the
2012 Olympics was awarded to London and on the 60th anniversary
of the end of the second world war, the timing couldn't
have been better. What a perfect opportunity for the globalists
to launch their latest assault against an unsuspecting
public.
It was only a matter of time until London such as New
York, Madrid and Bali was attacked. The only question
was 'when'? It had seemed as though America's main ally
in the Iraq war was long overdue for a staged terrorist
attack. The globalists simply had to wait for the right
time to strike.
In typical 'false flag terror attack' style, the mainstream
media claimed that a group calling itself the 'Al-Qaeda
Organization in Europe' had accepted responsibility for
the attacks; an organization that no one has heard of
before! No doubt fox news, the BBC and all the other Zionist
controlled media establishments will be churning out the
same recorded feed of carnage for the next few days, occasionally
interspersed with images of Osama Bin Laden firing an
AK-47.
Despite the level of control exercised over the media
by elite, it is the mainstream media that provides the
biggest clues to governmental prior knowledge and the
resulting cover-up.
Original press reports claimed that the Israeli minister,
Binyamin Netanyahu had been warned an hour before the
first explosion and as a result remained in his hotel
room.
Here's an excerpt from the Israel national news:
"The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance,
resulting in Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining
in his hotel room rather than make his way to the hotel
adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool
Street train station, where he was to address an economic
summit."
The slip-up was realized and since then several media
establishments, including sky news and the associated
press, hurriedly edited the articles.
The attacks came at a time when the British government
is trying to foist a biometric ID card on the general
public. What better excuse is needed to further this agenda
than a shocking 'terrorist' attack directly on British
soil.
"Order Out Of Chaos"
It now looks as though the government will have little
resistance to the latest step in pushing the public towards
a high tech police state. The popular backbench revolt
that so worried Blair now looks as though it will lose
its momentum in the face of such a tragedy.
Tony Blair will use the fateful day of the 7th of July
2005 as swift and expedient political capital to push
through a whole range of draconian measures, possibly
to bolster the case to invade Iran and Syria and all at
the expense of the dead and the maimed.
Don't listen to claims by the Zionist controlled mainstream
media that this was the work of organizations linked to
Al-Qaeda. Don't listen to any such organizations that
are quick to claim responsibility. There is no doubt that
this was the work of the minions employed by the dark
and subversive secret-government, often referred to as
the illuminati.
The ultimate aim of this outrage, just like WTC attacks,
is to scare the public into submission; to scare the public
into parting with basic civil liberties and to bring us
all into one world government.
Little can explain the true nature of the London bombings
more accurately than the words of Britain's most senior
police officer, Sir Ian Blair, given in a press conference
later in the day:
"While it is a confused situation - it must be a
confused situation with multiple sites like this - coordinated
effort is slowly bringing order
out of the chaos."
Dark days indeed. |
London
- While al-Qaida showed their customary ruthless skill
in planning the London bombings, their choice of target
may become a major strategic mistake.
London was not the only victim of the spate of bombings
of the trains and buses of the London transit system.
The bombers clearly meant to sow not
only panic but financial disruption, hitting stations
in the heart of the city of London, where most of world's
daily $1.5 trillion trades in currency are made. That
plan failed. The London markets - which did not close
- quickly sank 3 percent, but then recovered.
The other symbolic target of the bombers, the G8 summit,
may have been taking place 400 miles to the north, but
the presence of U.S. President George W. Bush as a guest
of Tony Blair, the twin authors of the war and the occupation
of Iraq, made the Gleneagles summit into an event worth
disrupting for al-Qaida.
Or did it? By attacking the country currently hosting
the G8 summit, al-Qaida has once again made it clear
that its enemy is the West as a whole, all the advanced
industrialized nations, including the next G8 invitees
such as India, China and Brazil.
And when the G8 leaders declared Thursday that the
attack on London was an attack on them all, the real
isolation of al-Qaida, and the utter emptiness of their
political agenda, became brutally clear.
But this G8 was rather different. By
bombing Britain at this time, al-Qaida also made it
clear that it did not give a hoot about world poverty,
about Africa, about the relief of debt, or about global
warming.
Al-Qaida's bombers also spat
in the face of the millions of young people who turned
up or tuned in to the Live 8 concerts over the weekend,
who were moved by the appeals of the artists and singers
to make a difference and use their voices and their
votes and their civic pressure to urge their political
leaders to tackle poverty and climate change.
To his credit, and despite formidable opposition in
the Bush White House and the central banks of the world,
Tony Blair tried to make this G8 summit stand for something
different, for some serious commitments to issue that
engage the passions of tens of millions of voters in
Europe, Japan, North America and around the world.
Blair went as far as a serious political leader can
go to support the Live 8 campaigners, and to give Bono
and Bob Geldof the blessing the British government on
their political endeavors.
And now, thanks to al-Qaida, this G8
summit at Gleneagles will be remembered not for what
it did for Africa (which was a very great deal, in securing
debt relief), and not for what it achieved in bridging
the gap between the rhetoric of the Bush White House
and the Kyoto protocol, but for the London bombings.
There is a contrast, if not a clash of civilizations.
The West's leaders try to help Africa, and Islam's extremists
try to explode their efforts by killing London commuters.
The al-Qaida website claims that "Britain is burning
with terror and fear and panic." Not so. The world's
TV audience can see that London is coping just as it
did with Hitler's blitz, with the same stiff upper lip
with which is greeted the bombs of the Irish Republican
Army. It will take more than a few Islamist fascists,
however vicious and ruthless, to make Londoners show
fear and panic.
More ironic still, the West is trying to help Africa
clamber out of poverty; the sheikhs of Araby are plunging
Africa deeper into penury. The oil bill for sub-Saharan
Africa is this year going to be $10 billion higher than
it was a year ago - and most of that money is heading
for the coffers of the country that produced most of
the 9/11 terrorists.
These ironies will not be lost on a new generation
of Westerners, of Japanese and Russians and Brazilians,
and quite possibly of Indians and Chinese, just coming
of age.
The Live 8 concerts will probably make this G8 summit
the first political event in which these young people
took a serious interest, and they have seen it blown
out of the headlines by bombers who view the grander
goals of Live 8 with contempt and as an opportunity
for the most bloodily vicious form of exploitation.
Some of them might even have agreed with Chris Martin
of Coldplay, probably the hottest band in the world
these days, who described the Live 8 concerts as "the
biggest thing that's ever been organized, probably in
the history of the world."
Not really, not when al-Qaida has a new act to put
on stage; not when it's time for another of Osama bin
Laden's greatest hits.
Of course, the London bombings may
have nothing to do Osama. Al-Qaida is now the McDonalds
of terrorism, a franchise operation in which the name
and the uniforms and product do not vary, but get delivered
by a host of different operators and franchisees. Al-Qaida
is the ultimate virtual corporation, a brand name for
a media-savvy entity that exists in cyberspace.
And doubtless al-Qaida's London franchisees thought
they were being really clever in hitting not just against
Blair's Britain, as one of 'Crusader countries"
with troops in Iraq, but also hitting the G8 as a whole
when all the world's media was gathered to watch it
grapple with the real issues of poverty and climate
change that Blair had laid before it.
What they hit instead was the sense of idealism and
hope that millions of young people had invested in this
G8, and they are likely to remember who spoiled their
party. |
TEHRAN - Islamic Iran unanimously
condemned the bomb attacks in London as "unacceptable
and inhumane", but a top cleric nevertheless argues
the blasts were direct result of US and Israeli policies.
"You talk about Al-Qaeda. Have you forgotten who
has bred Al-Qaeda?" Ayatollah Mohammad Emami Kashani
asked at a prayer sermon at Tehran University.
"It's the illegitimate child of America and Israel,
but you name it Islam. This savagery is not Islam. It
is coming from inside of you and it is now punching
you," he said in comments directed at British Prime
Minister Tony Blair.
Iran has linked the rise of Al-Qaeda
to US policy in the 1980s, when the CIA and Saudi Arabia
pumped billions of dollars into hardline Islamist groups
battling the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan and went
on to back the Taliban militia -- which Iran opposed.
"You created all this to
plague us, but now it is plaguing you. You have done
that before, by equipping Saddam with weapons to fight
us, but now you are bogged down in Iraq,"
he said, referring to US backing for Iraqi dictator
Saddam Hussein when he fought Iran in the 1980s.
"You have to learn from this and come to your
senses."
Hours after Thursday's blasts killed more than 50 people
and injured a further 700, Iran's foreign ministry "condemned
the terrorist attacks that caused deaths and injuries
among British citizens," the state news agency
IRNA reported.
Foreign ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi also expressed
"Iran's sympathy with the families of the victims
of these terrorist acts" and denounced "the
use of violence to achieve objectives."
Ayatollah Kashani repeated that condemnation.
"Iranians condemn the killing of women and children,
young and old in the London bombings and offer condolences
to the families of the victims," he told worshippers.
Such acts, he said, were "unacceptable and inhumane".
But the top cleric went on to condemn US President
George W. Bush, who has labelled Iran the world's number-one
sponsor of terrorism.
"Where have you reached by cracking down on terrorism?
It has happened again because you do not want to use
your head," Ayatollah Kashani said, drawing the
usual chants of "Death to America, Death to Israel".
"You train terrorists and
state terrorism. If you want to succeed you have
to leave Palestine alone," he added. "Acting
against terrorism must be honest ... and you will not
succeed unless you wise up and change your ways." |
This morning, the suffering, grief
and terror that have visited so many innocents in recent
years came to London. We have
not paid the kind of price that people have paid in
Fallujah, Najaf or Jenin, but it is a steep price nonetheless.
And its root causes are the same.
The bomb blasts were grimly predictable.
Indeed, they had been widely and repeatedly predicted
not least by rank-and-file Londoners, who knew
that by taking Britain into Iraq side-by-side with the
USA, Tony Blair had placed their city in the firing
line.
As I write, the wreckage is being cleared and the casualties
counted. But Blair has already appeared on television
to address the nation, pledging to defend "our
values" and "our way of life" against
those who would "impose extremism on the world".
He spoke of the unity of "civilised nations"
in resisting "terrorism". While the delivery
may be slicker, his "us" vs "them"
world-view was indistinguishable from Bush's. Even
by Blair's standards, it was a performance of nauseating
hypocrisy, as he sought to seize the moral high ground
in relation to violence and destruction that he himself
helped unleash.
The Labour government, egged on by the Conservative
opposition and the right-wing press, will now seek to
play on fear and drum up vindictive feelings. At this
stage, however, it is unclear how the British population
will respond. Will the mood more
resemble post 9/11 USA or Spain in the wake of the Madrid
carnage?
Coming the day after London's Olympic triumph, the
attacks are a grim reminder that media-hyped feel-good
boosterism will do nothing to mitigate the UK's plummeting
global standing. Blair's closeness to Bush, his championship
of the US neo-liberal model in the European Union, his
aggressive pursuit of the "war against terror"
have all diminished Britain in the eyes of Europe and
the world.
This is a reality of which many people in Britain are
acutely aware. Opposition to the invasion of Iraq spread
across every sector of British society, and was overwhelming
in London. Subsequent revelations
concerning the bogus claims about Iraq's weapons of
mass destruction have further embittered public opinion
and made the Prime Minister, according to every
poll, one of the least trusted and most disrespected
individuals in the country.
Of course, Blair was able to overcome this decided
disadvantage and get himself re-elected in May thanks
to the absence of meaningful opposition within the established
political system. That absence will be felt acutely
in the days to come as Britain wrestles with the consequences
of the bomb blasts.
The Blair government will doubtless
seek to use this morning's atrocity to escalate its
alarming attacks on civil liberties. The country's
1.5 million strong Muslim population, already subject
to police harassment, will come under increased pressure.
(Commentators have been quick
to claim that the bombs may be the work of people hiding
anonymously within the "law-abiding Muslim community".)
Anti-globalisation protesters currently gathered
outside the G8 summit at the Gleneagles Hotel in Scotland
will be branded as "terrorists" and
dealt with accordingly.
Fomenting and exploiting fear has been a speciality
of the Blair regime. Asylum seekers, teenagers wearing
hoods, militant Muslims, anarchists, paedophiles the
list of targets is lengthy and frighteningly flexible.
Whenever there is a need to distract people from the
impact of the government's neo-liberal economic policies,
from its failure to rebuild the public sector, from
its misbegotten foreign adventures, a new scapegoat
is conjured up. The bomb blasts may aid this process,
but there is also reason to hope
that this time there will be substantial public resistance.
On 15th February 2003, some two million
people gathered in London to demonstrate against the
imminent attack on Iraq. I remember speaking to a neighbour
who told me proudly that he was going on the march
his first ever protest march because he was damned
if he was going to let Tony Blair endanger his children's
lives by making London a prime target for attack.
Everything that has happened since then the exposure
of lie after lie, the deaths of British soldiers, the
refusal of ground realities in Iraq to conform to Blair's
scenario - has further entrenched popular resentment
of the war, widely seen as a result of Blair's determination
to court favour with George Bush. The prime minister
calculates that the bomb blasts will unite British people
behind their government and that a touch of well-rehearsed
statesman-like gravitas will refresh his image. Much
of the media will pump out the message that we are all
under threat from faceless barbarians irrationally opposed
to "our way of life". It
will be up to the anti-war movement to articulate a
different analysis, to remind people that this attack
is a consequence of our role in dishing out brutality
in Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine, and to insist that
no amount of moralistic posturing by our leaders can
substitute for a desperately needed change in policy.
Mike Marqusee is the author of Chains of Freedom:
the Politics of Bob Dylan's Art and Redemption Song:
Muhammed Ali and the Sixties. He can be reach through
his website: www.mikemarqusee.com |
When
the cops are the crooks
Staged bombings terrorize everyone while the real
perps keep getting richer |
By John Kaminski
skylax@comcast.net
Friday, July 8, 2005 |
How long are we going to permit
this vicious tomfoolery to continue?
Every time there's an embarrassing incident, a charge
of official malfeasance, or some nasty revelation to
cover up, the powers that be stage a terrorist incident
- randomly throw away the lives of an arbitrary number
of innocents - and then blame some fantasy enemy as
an excuse to further ratchet up the corrupt oppression
of ordinary people.
Notice how the accused perpetrators are never caught
- often, as with 9/11, never even adequately identified
- or if they are, they turn out to be some brainwashed
patsy like John Hinckley or Timothy McVeigh, both of
them (and all the assassin-type villains who have been
publicly caught and liquidated since JFK's public murder)
obviously incapable of carrying out the demonic deeds
they are so sensationalistically accused of - without
some serious assistance.
The London bombings remind me of the Madrid, Istanbul,
and Bali bombings. No one is ever caught. Stereotypically
rabid Arabs are blamed. And innocent people everywhere
suffer the consequences.
When are we going to put together
the pieces and see that this worldwide terror threat
that is so ballyhooed in the totally corrupt establishment
press is nothing more than stage-managed chaos designed
to further consolidate the profit-making power of the
super-rich, that all these senseless murders are nothing
more than anecdotal sacrifices to the financial plans
of the capitalist titans who control most of the world
and covet the rest of it?
Will we ever realize what this awful game really is?
We've had plenty of chances, a half-century's worth,
at least.
And we've flubbed every single one. We've failed to
halt this demonic progression of corporate totalitarianism
every time. And as a direct result, each new calculated
terror gambit has been a little bit worse.
Yes, plenty of people do see what this demented game
is, but they are not the powerful people. It remains
the eternal shame of the American people that not a
single person in the U.S. representative form of government
has had the courage to even acknowledge that serious
questions exist about the government-sponsored massacres
on 9/11 in New York City or on 4/19 in Oklahoma City.
Oh sure, a few trendy liberals have dipped their toes
in the water and mentioned in a barely audible murmur
that maybe the Iraq war - which is surely the most cruel
and irresponsible action the U.S. government has ever
taken (in a long, sorry list of reckless actions taken
that have used hollow lies as their justification) -
is not quite on the up and up, but even those timid
would-be patriots have received no support from the
mindlocked corporate media.
And as a result, people are afraid to speak out, for
fear of losing their jobs, or even their families, or
- in the cases of someone like Paul Wellstone or Hunter
S. Thompson - their lives.
So what I want to know is how long
we are all going to cower in fear, and continue to make
believe that the big U.S. newspapers and TV networks
are telling the truth, when it should be clear (IMHO)
that they are lying - just like their president and
Congress - about just about everything?
It should be clear by now that if we continue to do
this, they're going to pick us off, one by one.
But who will have the courage to stand up and say -
Hey, wait a minute! This is our own government doing
these things to us at the behest of the influential
people who control them. How else could Halliburton
keep getting all those contracts as judges' heads snap
in the opposite direction whenever the subject is mentioned?
How else could all those pharmaceutical companies get
senators to legislate them immunity for putting poisons
in their medicines that create millions of vegetative
children?
How much longer are we going to tolerate this egregious
level of corruption? Surely we must realize that everything
we thought we held dear has already been destroyed by
this kind of behavior. I mean, does everybody still
secretly harbor the fantasy they will turn into Kenneth
Lay and suddenly be able to bilk the public out of hundreds
of millions of dollars and then escape because they
are protected by their contributions to the Republican
National Committee? Is that the
new American dream?
I was thinking about these things one recent day as
I was riding the train into New York City and perusing
its formidable skyline, which of course is now forever
missing those two tall square edged towers that used
to be the symbol of American fortitude. They are still
there, in my mind, ghost towers in the sad shadow of
memory, exuding horrifying memories of smoke and dust
and little stick figures forever falling into the uncaring
abyss of time.
And I was thinking about why they weren't there anymore,
those two tall towers, and remembering some of the things
I'd said about that over these past three years, and
maybe I was reviewing how I should go on talking about
them as the train rattled down the the tracks toward
Secaucus.
I have among other things said that the entire Congress
and thousands of people who work for the federal government
should be indicted as accomplices to mass murder and
treason for abetting all the horrible things that the
American government has done to the rest of the world
- not to even mention its own people - over these past
few years, and I began to think about that.
I've been one to advocate not voting at all because
the process has become so corrupted, and I've insisted
that in order to fix what is wrong with America and
the world the whole rotten system has to come down.
Ship everyone in Congress to Guantanamo and let all
those innocent Arabs and Afghanis go home to their families
where they belong.
But then I started to think about what the system really
is - people who rely on their government for their disability
checks in order to breathe and eat for another day;
millions of government employees at all levels who raise
families on their paychecks, worry about medical bills,
and try to get their kids into college; millions of
other who wouldn't even live more than a few days should
the whole system suddenly crash.
And yet, there it was, staring me in the face, right
where the ghost towers stood. The system that made all
these people's lives (including mine) so palatable,
so enjoyable, so viable, was the same system that invented
(with the help of Israeli intelligence, British bankers
and the Muslim brotherhood) the al-Qaeda terror concept,
and under the tutelage of the Mossad, MI-5, and the
CIA, was setting off all these bombs all over the world
and blaming them on fantasy Arabs so that sad amputees
could get on buses in Queens and news vendors could
hawk the venomous, hate-crime-advocating New York Post
on oily street corners in Manhattan and thereby feed
their families and find a little joy in their mundane
little lives, which were really not that different from
mine.
And I thought (as I have so many times), what a warped
deal this whole thing is. Do we really have to kill
so many, and lie so often, to get so little, even though
we need every bit of it?
So then I turned off my mind and turned back to my
cuddly companion and thought how lucky I was to be in
this time and space, healthy and happy if a little overcritical
and introspective.
Later I would think that we
are each one of us all alone in this world, and that
if we didn't insist on being honest and not killing
people we didn't have to kill, would the world fall
apart because of that? In
other words, is all this dramatic killing necessary
to enable we Americans to live the bounteous lives we
have become accustomed to?
And if it is necessary - if George W. Bush is really
right about the way the world is - is this any kind
of world I would want to be a part of? I don't think
so. And yet, as a sometimes thoughtless American, I
take part in the bounty, I reap the dividends of (relative)
affluence and amusements that America affords me, and
that everyone in the world continues to covet.
So in that sense, I share in the responsibility
for the trauma America's war machine wreaks around the
world.
So if forced to make a choice, which one would I choose?
The powers that be are continuing to blow up innocent
people to make America a soft and sweet place to live.
Could it be such a place without the carnage? Without
the lies?
Is our dalliance with Super Bowls and Xanax directly
dependent on murdering people of color who happen to
be sitting on oil we desire?
Is why most of us don't say anything about what our
government does to innocent bystanders because we are
deep down the same kind of people as George W. Bush
and Dick Cheney, and can look the other way when somebody
has to be eliminated in order to provide us with our
creature comforts?
If we are that kind of person, then we shouldn't be
upset about 9/11, about our government's killing 3,000
of our own citizens, or about blowing up a few people
in London, because it needed to be done so we could
play our iPods in peace.
But if we are not that kind of person, isn't
it about time we realized that the 9/11 massacre - just
like the London bombing - is something that will inevitably
happen to us, because we have tolerated violence in
the name of profit for more than 200 years, and we have
profited mightily from it. Did
you really think we could live our whole lives without
paying for what we have done to the world?
You who are reading this right now - pretend, just
for argument's sake, you are an American. What do you
think is a fair price you should pay for what you have
done to the world?
And when the cops are really the crooks, who will you
turn to for help, that one fine day, when the bomb the
power elite put there to convince the public the enemy
is nearby, is ticking on YOUR bus?
John Kaminski is an internet essayist whose stories
have been seen on hundreds of websites around the world.
They have been collected into two anthologies titled
"America's Autopsy Report" and "The Perfect
Enemy" and are for sale on his website, http://www.johnkaminski.com/,
as is the booklet "The Day America Died,"
written for those who still believe the government's
false story of what happened on September 11, 2001. |
In what appears to be the first
major break in the London terrorist attacks, U.S. authorities
tell ABC News that police in London have recovered key
parts of the timing devices that set off the bombs,
suggesting they were planted in packages or bags and
left behind.
There also are reports that police may have discovered
two unexploded bombs as they sifted through the wreckage
of the four bombs that did go off. At least several
dozen people were killed in the attacks, and hundreds
of others were injured while traveling on subways and
a double-decker bus. Scotland
Yard has denied finding undetonated explosive devices
in the wreckage.
The bomb parts and timing mechanisms should provide
important evidence that could help determine who was
behind the attacks, sources told ABC News.
Officials now believe that all the bombs were detonated
by timing devices. Earlier today, British investigators
had believed that the bomb on the bus was the work of
a suicide bomber, sources said.
Who Is Responsible?
The London bombings are similar in many ways to the
coordinated blasts on Spanish trains in Madrid 16 months
ago that killed 200 people.
The most important piece of evidence in Madrid was
the discovery of a backpack in the rubble. A cell phone
inside had been wired as a bomb detonator, and the phone
led police to the terrorists. They were able to track
where it had been sold, who had sold it and who had
bought it.
Police say twice in the last three years they have
disrupted plans to attack the London subway system.
High on the list of suspects
in today's attack is the same man who has been terrorizing
Iraq - Abu Musab al Zarqawi. Officials say he
and Osama bin Laden have talked of expanding attacks
to Europe and the United States and have been recruiting
people in the Islamic world and western Europe to carry
out the attacks.
The only claim of responsibility came today on an Islamist
Web site, posted by a previously-unknown group. The
site claimed the attacks on London were carried out
because of the presence of British troops in Iraq and
Afghanistan, but there was no way to determine
the authenticity of the claim or the group. |
LONDON -- Hours of closed-circuit
television footage to scrutinize, tons of debris to
sift through, small traces of explosives to examine.
British investigators - their skills honed by anti-terror
work from decades of Irish Republican Army bombings
- find themselves at the start of a daunting task to
track down those responsible for Thursday's deadly explosions
in London.
"There is real passion
now in the police to make arrests quickly before further
attacks can be carried out," said Charles
Shoebridge, a security analyst and former counterterrorism
intelligence officer.
Based on evidence recovered from the rubble, investigators
believe some of the bombs were on timers, a U.S. law
enforcement official said on condition of anonymity
because the investigation was ongoing.
Investigators doubted that cell phones - used to trigger
last year's train bombings in Madrid - were used to
detonate the bombs Thursday because reception is spotty
in the Underground's tunnels, the official said.
Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said Thursday's bombings
- which came the day after London won the bid to host
the 2012 Olympics and as British Prime Minister Tony
Blair prepared to open a G-8 summit in Scotland - have
the "hallmarks of an al-Qaida-related attack."
Shoebridge said a second attack was
likely "because there's no reason for them not
to, they've broken their cover,"
"They will now try to exploit whatever freedom
they have left" to kill again, because it is likely
they will eventually be caught, Shoebridge added.
A group calling itself "The Secret Organization
of al-Qaida in Europe" said in an Internet statement
that it staged the blasts in retaliation for Britain's
involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan. Police
said they couldn't confirm the authenticity of the statement.
A senior U.S. counterterrorism official said the claim
is considered "potentially very credible"
because it appeared on a Web site that in the past has
been used for extremist postings, the
message appeared soon after the attacks and does not
appear rushed. [...]
One issue hampering the investigation is fear that
the tunnels themselves may have been damaged in the
blasts, the official said. It could be some time before
engineers determine the tunnels are safe enough to allow
investigators to collect evidence, the official said.
[...]
The cell phones used in the March 11, 2004, attacks,
which left 191 dead in Madrid, led investigators to
some of the attackers. One bomb failed to go off, and
the subscriber identity card inside that phone eventually
led investigators to the suspects, although they haven't
found the plot's masterminds.
After New York's World Trade Center
was attacked with a truck bomb in 1993, one of the conspirators
gave investigators a hand by trying to retrieve a deposit
he'd put down on the vehicle destroyed in the blast.
Police in London may get a break like
that too, but they also have a lot of hard slogging
ahead of them.
London is crammed with closed-circuit television cameras
- 1,800 in its train stations, 6,000 in the Underground
network and some on buses.
Shoebridge said detectives will have to watch thousands
of hours of tape - slowly and carefully.
Investigators will try to find on tape the point at
which bombs were placed, then trace back the movements
of the bomber, a task that could involve hundreds of
cameras, Shoebridge said. Most of London's Underground
cameras are in stations, not subway cars. [...]
Shoebridge said investigators also will check records
of cell phone calls made in the bombed areas just before
the explosions, a job that might be difficult if investigators
can't determine where bombers boarded the trains.
Forensic evidence will be key. If any of the perpetrators
were suicide bombers, there will be body parts to examine
for clues. If not, detectives will search for DNA or
fingerprints.
They'll also have to examine recent intelligence -
including the phone and e-mail intercepts routinely
collected as part of anti-terrorism work - to see if
any clues were missed or if any of the communications
contain information that looks significant in hindsight,
Shoebridge said.
Old interviews with informants will be re-examined
and new ones conducted.
In the end, authorities will have to
identify "whatever failings exist, if any, in the
intelligence system that allowed this attack to take
place, because it is an intelligence failure,"
Shoebridge said. |
Identity cards would
not have stopped the London bombings which claimed the
lives of 37 people and injured many more, Charles Clarke
has said.
But on balance, the home secretary says, he believes
ID cards would help rather than hinder the ability to
deal with particular terrorist threats.
He also suggested that in future civil
liberties may have to be curtailed.
Consideration would need to be given to checks on people
boarding tube trains, ID cards and data exchange, he says.
He also insisted that the small reduction in the threat
level made before the bombings had made no difference
to the attacks.
Asked by BBC Radio 4's Today programme if ID cards could
have prevented Thursday's atrocity, Mr Clarke said: "I
doubt it would have made a difference.
"I've never argued ... that ID cards would prevent
any particular act.
"The question on ID cards, but also on any other
security measure actually, is on the balance of the ability
to deal with particular threats and civil liberties, does
a particular measure help or hinder it?
"I actually think ID cards do help rather than hinder.
"If you ask me whether ID cards or any other measure
would have stopped yesterday, I can't identify any measure
which would have just stopped it like that."
Alternative solutions
In a separate interview on BBC Breakfast, Mr Clarke was
asked about how people could be kept safe in the wake
of the attacks.
"I don't think any of us want to live a life where
we have to go through security checks every moment of
our lives and so we have to find the right way to move
forward," he said.
"The key thing is to study after these terrible
events what needs to be done and discuss properly what
alternative solutions there are."
Asked if that meant civil liberties being curtailed,
he said: "I always hope not.
"But whether we look at identity cards or you look
at exchange of data or you look at particular types of
checking machinery when you get on a tube train or whatever
it might be, those are issues that have to be debated.
"Today isn't the time for those debates. Today is
the time to track down the perpetrators and see that we
can try and make the arrests that are necessary.
"People will have to look at the options and decide
which is the right way to proceed." [...] |
More on London bombs:
- I prefer the hybrid model for all these attacks, by
which I mean the involvement of real Islamic terrorists
guided by an intelligence agency. The intelligence agency
funds much of the operation, chooses the targets and
the time, and provides technical assistance. The Islamic
terrorists provide most of the manpower. In some cases
the terrorists are completely fooled into participating
(probably what happened in Madrid, a Spanish police
operation with Muslim men tricked into being in the
wrong place at the wrong time), and in some cases they
go along with the promptings of the intelligence agency
as the operation fits into their own agenda.
- Problems
in the taking of responsibility may either indicate
a mistake by the sponsoring intelligence agency, or,
more likely, a lack of education in the al Qaeda 'cell'
coupled with the lack of communication necessary in
an operation that relies on independent cells.
- Did you notice how much better the Wikipedia article
is than anything in the old-fashioned mainstream media?
- Blair was riding high with the Olympic win and the
G-8 summit, so it is unlikely that he was aware of the
operation. That is not to say that there was no British
government involvement.
- The attack will almost certainly allow the imposition
of fascistic ID cards on the British population, a goal
that was dead prior to the attacks due to the complete
rejection of the idea by the British public.
- From WagNews:
"The bombings come just a day after
London was selected to host the 2012 Olympic games,
and after a world focus on London as part of the Live
8 concert events. Were the attack to have taken place
just 24hrs. before - it would have scuppered London's
bid for the games."
The timing was very fine. It did not ruin the British
Olympic bid, as the British plutocrats dearly wanted
the Olympics, but it needed to happen before the G-8
Summit started. It can now be used to start a new war
in the Middle East, to protect Bush from having to commit
on climate change, and to shelter Bush and Blair from
recent revelations about the lies which led to the attack
on Iraq.
- The Israelis got caught in a big mess attempting
to claim that they were not given prior warning by British
officials, when they clearly were
given such warning, and Netanyahu changed
his plans because of the warning. Much is being made
of this, but to me it indicates no Israeli involvement
(well, at least not by the mainstream Israeli government).
Had Israel been involved in the attack, it would have
been much better prepared to spin it properly. The confusion
is evidence of innocence.
- The attack appears to be technically identical to
the Madrid attack. Bombs in bags triggered by cellphones.
Some
are trying to argue that the sophistication of the attack
means that the West now has to throw all caution to
the winds and engage in a full fledged war against Islam.
This is nonsense. Rather than being sophisticated, the
attack was absurdly simple. It could be repeated anywhere
in the world tomorrow. There is no defense against
it. That alone should prompt us to conclusively
reject the insane Zionist model that we can somehow
fight a war against terror. The only appropriate response
is to find out what's bugging the Islamic world, and
negotiate a rational agreement. That would involve the
same three completely reasonable requests we have always
faced:
- a fair resolution of the Palestinian problem,
which would involve the creation of a viable Palestinian
state (so this predictable response
is completely backasswards);
- removal of Western troops from Islamic countries
(moving
them from Iraq to Afghanistan doesn't count!); and
- replacement of corrupt Western toady regimes in
Middle Eastern countries.
Each of these requests is completely just, and progress
needs to be made before more innocent people are killed.
- It appears that the old deal between the British government
and international terrorism - that London would host
terrorist organizations from around the world, and not
interfere with their international operations, on condition
that they not attack London - is now over.
|
How is it that the second most
powerful man in America is about to take a fall and
the mainstream media are largely taking a pass? Could
it be that the fear of Karl Rove and this White House
is so great that not even the biggest of the media big
boys are willing to take them on? Does the answer to
that one go without saying?
Chatter about the Rove story has come to dominate the
downtime at the Aspen Institute's five-day Ideas Festival.
Whenever participants are not in sessions, they're gathering
in small groups and dissecting, analyzing, and speculating
about the outcome of this surprisingly slow-breaking
scandal.
One such discussion took place just after David Gergen
had finished a conversation with Rick Warren, author
of The Purpose-Driven Life, which has sold 25 million
copies in hardback! A cluster of high-powered media
insiders quickly switched over to "The Gossip-Driven
Reality." The well-informed suppositions were flying
faster than the peloton at the Tour de France. I can
tell you what was said, I just can't tell you who was
saying it (Just look at it as an anonymous twist on
the HuffPost BozBlog).
According to the players, the key to whether this story
has real legs -- and whether it will spell the end of
Rove -- is determining intent. And a key to that is
whether there was a meeting at the White House where
Rove and Scooter Libby discussed what to do with the
information they had gotten from the State Department
about Valerie Plame being Joe Wilson's wife, and her
involvement in his being sent on the Niger/yellowcake
mission. If it can be proven that such a meeting occurred,
then Rove will be in deep trouble -- especially if it
is established that Rove made three phone calls leaking
the info about Plame and her CIA gig: one to Matt Cooper,
one to Walter Pincus, and one to Robert Novak.
Other than intent, the other big legal question raised
was: will Rove be able to get away with claiming that
he did not know Plame was an undercover agent?
We all know what happened after Rove placed those calls.
The question is, what will happen now?
From the way they've acted so far,
the mainstream media would rather this scandal just
go away (bloggers take note).
Just look at the way Newsweek handled the Rove-outed-Plame
story in this week's edition. The editors obviously
knew they had a hot story and could have pushed it hard.
Instead, it's clear that they lawyered it within an
inch of its life -- a bunch of legal eagles with faint
hearts removing any juice and most of the meat from
it.
As one of the Aspen wags put it: "Once Newsweek
flushed the Koran down the toilet, you can bet they'll
think twenty times before they pull down the handle
again."
Want another example? Just look at
how the White House press corps is dealing with the
story: by avoiding it completely.
Today's press gaggle took place aboard Air Force One
on the way to Scotland. Now, given that Rove may or
may not be the subject of a federal investigation, one
would think that our intrepid White House reporters
might, you know, ask the White House spokesman about
that.
But if you do a text search for the word "Rove,"
you'll see that not a single press person thought that
the fact that the President of the United States' most
trusted advisor is, at the very least, a key player
in a criminal investigation was worth a single question
to Scottie McClellan. Not a one.
This is all the more significant because of the role
McClellan may eventually play in Rove's fate. As Newsweek
reported and I blogged about, when this story began
heating up, McClellan went out of his way to defend
Rove -- saying that he'd been "assured" that
Rove was not involved in the leaking.
"Rove will have no compunction about lying through
his teeth to save himself, counting on the fact that
Cooper's e-mails are, apparently, not cut and dried,"
one of the group said. And it doesn't hurt that Rove's
underlings would rather fall on their swords than tell
the truth... which, in the Bush White House, is seen
as selling out. All of which
would leave McClellan to "take one for the team
and eat major crow about all the assurances he'd given
the press." Of course, if they continue to avoid
asking him about it, he may not even have to do that.
As the group started walking to the next seminar, my
mind turned back to the Gergen-Warren conversation.
Near the end, a woman stood up, identified herself as
Jewish and asked Warren if she would be saved. He told
her that he believed that you can only be saved through
Jesus Christ. I only wished I had stood up and asked
Warren: What will it take for Karl Rove to be saved? |
Two years ago, when I first read
the federal law protecting the identities of covert
agents, my reaction was the same as everyone else who
reads it -- this is not an easy law to break. That's
what I said on Hardball then in my first public discussion
of the outing of Valerie Plame, and that's what I said
on CNN the other night. Let's walk through the pieces
that would have to fall into place for Karl Rove to
have committed a crime when he revealed Plame's identity
to Matt Cooper.
First, and most obviously, Valerie Plame had to be
a covert agent when Rove exposed her to Cooper. It's
not obvious that she was. The law has a specific definition
of covert agent that she might not fit -- an overseas
posting in the last five years, for example. But it's
hard to believe the prosecutor didn't begin the grand
jury session with a CIA witness certifying that Plame
was a covert agent. If the prosecutor couldn't establish
that, why bother moving on to the next witness?
Second, Rove had to know she was a covert agent. Cooper's
article refers to Plame as "a CIA official."
Most CIA officials are not covert agents.
Third, Rove had to know that the CIA was taking "affirmative
measures" to hide her identity. Doesn't seem like
the kind of thing a political operative would or should
know.
Fourth, Rove had to be "authorized" to have
classified information about covert agents or at least
this one covert agent. Doesn't seem like the kind of
security clearance a political operative would or should
have.
I'll be surprised if all four of those elements of
the crime line up perfectly for a Rove indictment. Surprised,
not shocked. There is one very
good reason to think they might. It is buried in one
of the handful of federal court opinions that have come
down in the last year ordering Matt Cooper and Judy
Miller to testify or go to jail.
In February, Circuit Judge David Tatel joined his colleagues'
order to Cooper and Miller despite his own, very lonely
finding that indeed there is a federal privilege for
reporters that can shield them from being compelled
to testify to grand juries and give up sources. He based
his finding on Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence,
which authorizes federal courts to develop new privileges
"in the light of reason and experience." Tatel
actually found that reason and experience "support
recognition of a privilege for reporters' confidential
sources." But Tatel still ordered Cooper and Miller
to testify because he found that the privilege had to
give way to "the gravity of the suspected crime."
Judge Tatel's opinion has eight blank
pages in the middle of it where he discusses the secret
information the prosecutor has supplied only to the
judges to convince them that the testimony he is demanding
is worth sending reporters to jail to get. The gravity
of the suspected crime is presumably very well developed
in those redacted pages. Later, Tatel refers to "[h]aving
carefully scrutinized [the prosecutor's] voluminous
classified filings."
Some of us have theorized that the prosecutor may have
given up the leak case in favor of a perjury case, but
Tatel still refers to it simply as a case "which
involves the alleged exposure of a covert agent."
Tatel wrote a 41-page opinion in which he seemed eager
to make new law -- a federal reporters' shield law --
but in the end, he couldn't bring himself to do it in
this particular case. In his final paragraph, he says
he "might have" let Cooper and Miller off
the hook "[w]ere the leak at issue in this case
less harmful to national security."
Tatel's colleagues are at least as impressed with the
prosecutor's secret filings as he is. One simply said
"Special Counsel's showing decides the case."
All the judges who have seen the prosecutor's
secret evidence firmly believe he is pursuing a very
serious crime, and they have done everything they can
to help him get an indictment. |
Conservatives who have spent more
than a decade planning for this moment to change the
balance of power on the Supreme Court are reeling from
blows delivered by two dissimilar political leaders:
Edward M. Kennedy and George W. Bush. Sen. Kennedy has
succeeded with the news media in establishing a new
standard of ''mainstream conservatism'' for a justice.
President Bush has put forth ''friendship'' as a qualification
for being named to the high court.
Bush is by far the bigger obstacle in the way of a
conservative court. While Kennedy's ploy presents a
temporary problem, Bush's stance could be fatal. The
right's morale was devastated by the president's comments
in a USA Today telephone interview published on the
newspaper's front page Tuesday: ''Al Gonzales is a great
friend of mine. When a friend gets attacked, I don't
like it.''
Bush is a stubborn man, who sounded like he might really
nominate Attorney General Alberto Gonzales in the face
of deep and broad opposition from the president's own
political base.
Adding to the tension is word
from court sources that ailing Chief Justice William
Rehnquist also will announce his retirement before the
week is over. That would
enable Bush to play this game: Name one justice no less
conservative than Rehnquist, and name Gonzales, whose
past record suggests he would replicate retiring Justice
Sandra Day O'Connor on abortion and possibly other social
issues. Thus, the present ideological orientation of
the court would be unchanged, which would suit the left
just fine. [...] |
"People have been waiting
for 11 years for a Supreme Court vacancy, Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales said Wednesday in Denver, and so people
have very strong views about this. (Post / Craig F.
Walker)
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales on Wednesday welcomed
President Bush's request for Supreme Court-watching
activists to "tone down the heated rhetoric"
after conservatives launched a vocal campaign against
Gonzales' possible nomination to replace outgoing Justice
Sandra Day O'Connor.
"I would react the same way if I saw a friend
attacked," Gonzales said in Denver two days after
a USA Today article quoted Bush as saying: "Al
Gonzales is a great friend of mine. When a friend gets
attacked, I don't like it."
Conservative activists last
week said they feared Gonzales might not add a truly
conservative voice to the high court when it came to
issues such as abortion and affirmative action.
[...] |
IRAQI security forces, set up by
American and British troops, torture detainees by pulling
out their fingernails, burning them with hot irons or
giving them electric shocks, Iraqi officials say. Cases
have also been recorded of bound prisoners being beaten
to death by police.
In their haste to put police on the streets to counter
the brutal insurgency, Iraqi and US authorities have
enlisted men trained under Saddam Hussein's regime and
versed in torture and abuse, the officials told The
Times. They said that recruits were also being drawn
from the ranks of outlawed Shia militias.
Counter-insurgencies are rarely clean fights, but Iraq's
dirty war is being waged under the noses of US and British
troops whose mission is to end the abuses of the former
dictatorship. Instead,
they appear to have turned a blind eye to the constant
reports of torture from Iraq's prisons.
Among the worst offenders cited are the Interior Ministry
police commandos, a force made up largely of former
army officers and special forces soldiers drawn from
the ranks of Saddam's dissolved army. They
are seen as the most effective tool the coalition has
in fighting the insurgency.
"It's a gruesome situation we are in," a
senior Iraqi official said. "You have to understand
the situation when the special commandos were formed
last August. They were taking on an awful lot of people
in a great hurry. Many of them were people who served
in Saddam's forces . . . The choice of taking them on
was a difficult one. There was no supervision. There
still really isn't any, and that applies to all the
security forces. They're all doing this."
"This", said Saad Sultan,
the Human Rights Ministry official in charge of monitoring
Iraq's prisons, includes random arrests, sometimes without
a warrant, hanging people from ceilings and beating
them, attaching electrodes to ears, hands, feet and
genitals, and holding hot irons to flesh.
Four of his 22 monitors have already
quit their jobs, leaving a handful of lawyers to inspect
scores of prisons.
"Two months ago I could go into a prison and more
than 50 per cent of the people had been ill-treated,"
Mr Sultan said. Six months ago the situation had been
even worse.
Reports of torture and abuse are commonplace. Omar,
a 22-year-old student, said that he was picked up in
a night raid on his home in Baghdad by police commandos,
who dragged him away from his family to a detention
facility. No one told him where he was or what he was
accused of, he said. As he was marched into prison,
policemen lined up to beat him and his fellow detainees.
The prisoners' handcuffs were tightened until the men
screamed.
The next day, he and his neighbour were blindfolded
and transported to another facility, where his neighbour
collapsed unconscious during a beating. He was then
led into an interrogation room, where a policeman attached
electrodes to his thumbs and toes. "I immediately
asked what they wanted and he said something like, 'You
have been targeting police and national guardsmen'.
Without waiting for my response, he switched on the
electricity, then kept on turning it off and on until
I could hardly breathe.
"I screamed under torture," Omar said. "It's
not a place to prove your courage. These guys are trying
to kill you for nothing." He was released without
charge after 12 days.
The abuse has not gone unnoticed by
the coalition, but little has been done to address it.
A US State Department report in February stated that
Iraqi authorities had been accused of "arbitrary
deprivation of life, torture, impunity, poor prison
conditions - particularly in pre-trial detention facilities
- and arbitrary arrest and detention." A Human
Rights Watch report also noted that "unlawful arrest,
long-term incommunicado detention, torture and other
ill-treatment of detainees (including children) by Iraqi
authorities have become routine and commonplace".
Evidence of extra-judicial killings by the security
forces has also come to light. Mr Sultan is investigating
the case of three members of the Badr Corps, the paramilitary
wing of one of the main Shia parties in government,
who were arrested by police, handcuffed and beaten to
death.
An Iraqi official said that the Iraqi National Guard,
the US-trained paramilitary police,
regularly disposed of the corpses of its victims by
throwing them in the river. "The problem is that
some people have still got that training from the past,"
he said. "You have ten or twelve of them in the
same unit working, and if they seize terrorists they
will torture or kill them."
He added that while the de facto death
squads were not part of government policy, little was
being done to counteract them. "These are exceptional
times. It's an emergency."
General Adnan Thabet, the commandos' commander and
a special adviser to the Interior Minister, was a senior
officer under Saddam. He was sentenced to death for
plotting against the former dictator and was tortured
after his sentence was commuted.
He denied any allegation of torture, but admitted:
"This is a dirty war. We are the only ones with
the nerves to fight it." |
I belong to that generation of
undergraduates who cut their teeth on linguistics. Lancaster
University in its second year of existence: Class of
'67, if I'm not mistaken, was as innovative as it was
a bit odd. "Digs" were on the Morecombe seafront,
lectures in a converted chapel and tutorials in an old
linen factory. But the books we studied invariably included
the immensely boring Zelig Harris and the stunningly
brilliant Noam Chomsky.
Less famous then than now, it was Chomsky who introduced
me to the "foregrounded element." That is
when someone places words in such an order that a new
meaning is attached to them or deliberately leaves out
a word that we might expect. The big bad man emphasizes
the meanness of the man. But the bad big man makes us
think of size. "Big" has been "foregrounded."
Real linguists won't like the above definition but journalists,
I fear, sometimes have to distort in order to make plain.
Presidents too, it seems. Because I did a little linguistic
analysis on George W. Bush's Fort Bragg address to Americans
on June 28 and came up with some pretty strange results.
First, of course, was his use
of the words "terrorism" and "terror"
33 times.
More interesting was the way in which he deployed these
massed ranks of terrorists. If you divided his speech
up into eight parts, "terrorists" or "terror"
popped up eight times in the first, eight times in the
second, three times in the third, nine in the fourth,
two in the fifth, none at all in the sixth, a measly
three in the seventh and again none at all in the eighth.
The columns in which "terror" disappeared
were full of different clichés. Challenge, a
good constitution (an Iraqi one, of course), a chance
to vote, a free society, certain truths (I won't insult
you by telling you where that was snitched from), defending
our freedom, flying the flag, great turning points in
the story of freedom, prevail (one of Churchill's favorite
words) and no higher call.
Put through Chomsky's machine, Bush's
speech begins by frightening the audience to death with
terrorism and finishes triumphantly by rousing them
to patriotic confidence in their country's future victory.
It wasn't actually a speech at all.
It was a movie script, a screenplay.
The bad guys are really bad but they're going to get
their comeuppance because the good guys are going to
win.
Other elements of the Bush speech were, of course,
woefully dishonest.
It's a bit much for Bush to claim that
"terrorists" want to "topple governments"
when the only guys who've been doing that -- in Afghanistan
and Iraq -- were, ahem, ahem, the Americans.
There are plenty of references to the evil nature of
"the enemy" -- tyranny and oppression, remnants,
the old order -- and a weird new version of the Iraqi-9/11
lie. Instead of Saddam's non-existent alliance with
al-Qaida, we now have the claim from Bush that the Iraqi
"terrorists who kill innocent men, women and children
on the streets of Baghdad are followers of the same
murderous ideology that took the lives of our citizens"
on Sept. 11, 2001. Whoops! It's
no longer the Saddam regime that was involved in these
attacks, it seems; it's now the post-Saddam insurgents
who are part of the same gang.
It's strange that for a White House that writes screenplays,
the words of Osama bin Laden appear so uninteresting.
Whenever Bin Laden speaks, no one bothers to read through
his speech. The questions are always: Was it him? Is
he alive? Where is he? Never: What did he say?
There are real perils in this. Let me show you why.
On Feb. 13, 2003, bin Laden's latest audiotape was broadcast
by the Arabic satellite channel, al-Jazeera. This, remember,
was five weeks before the Anglo-American invasion.
In that message, bin Laden made a statement in which
he said that "it is beyond doubt that this crusader
war is ... directed against the family of Islam, irrespective
of whether the Socialist party and Saddam survive or
not ... Despite our belief and our proclamation concerning
the infidelity of socialists, in present-day circumstances
there is a coincidence of interests between Muslims
and socialists in their battles against the Crusaders."
And there you have it. Bin Laden, who hated Saddam
-- he told me this himself, in person -- made a call
to his followers to fight alongside an Iraqi force that
included Saddam's Iraqi Baathist "Socialists."
This was the moment when Iraq's future guerrilla army
fused with the future suicide bombers, the message that
would create the detonation that would engulf the West
in Iraq. And we didn't even notice.
The U.S. "experts" waffled about whether bin
Laden was alive -- not what he said. For once, Bush
got it right -- but he was too late. Always, as they
say, read the text. |
Washington - The Department of
Energy is turning to old Star Trek phasers to protect
its 103 civilian nuclear plants.
Energy weapons capable of harmlessly
stunning intruders are being developed and should be
in general use by 2008. But many experts warn
they will be inadequate and unnecessary for the real
security dangers nuclear plant guards would face.
U. S scientists have unveiled details of a project
that aims to develop Star Trek-style ray guns that could
keep "security adversaries" out of DoE nuclear
sites, the vnu.com web-site in the Netherlands reported
this week.
The DoE's Office of Security and Safety Performance
Assurance together with the Department of Defense, is
"exploring the potential" of directed-energy
weapons based on millimeter-wave rays, vnu.com said.
The report comes amid increasing fears that the 103
civilian nuclear power stations in the United States
and the Department of Energy's other nuclear facilities
are insufficiently guarded.
A recent in-depth investigation by Time magazine found
that there are only 8,000 full-time guards employed
to cover all the nuclear power plants in America, giving
an average of only 80 per power plant, of whom not more
than 60 and probably even less would be on duty on any
given shift.
The magazine also reported that the guard towers around
the plants are called "iron coffins" by the
guards who man them and that they could not repel even
a .50-caliber rifle bullet.
The appeal of the weapon is that it would permit security
guards in nuclear power stations and other facilities
to fire more freely against assailants who had penetrated
into the plant without having to worry that stray bullets
would smash crucial pieces of machinery.
Terrorists who had penetrated into such installations
would not be worried about inflicting such damage and
would therefore have the potential advantage in any
shoot-out.
The proposed new weapons being developed
have been designated Active Denial Technology (ADT).
And they are an emerging class of non-lethal weaponry
using 95GHz millimeter-wave directed energy, vnu.com
said.
According to the DoE, the technology
is capable of rapidly heating human skin to a pain level
that has been demonstrated as "very effective at
repelling people" without apparently burning the
skin or causing other secondary effects.
ADT emits a 95GHz non-ionizing electromagnetic beam
of energy that penetrates approximately 1/64 of an inch
into human skin tissue, where nerve receptors are concentrated.
Within seconds, the beam will heat the exposed skin
tissue to a level where intolerable pain is experienced
and natural defense mechanisms take over. This intense
heating sensation stops only if the individual moves
out of the beam's path or the beam is turned of, vnu.com
said.
The sensation caused by the system has been described
by test subjects as feeling like touching a hot frying
pan or the intense radiant heat from a fire. Burn
injury is prevented by limiting the beam's intensity
and duration, the web-site said.
Sandia National Laboratories, a Nuclear Security Administration
lab, will investigate how the technology could be used
on adversaries by developing a small ADT system to protect
U.S. nuclear sites.
However, the project still faces many technical challenges,
so Sandia has launched partnerships with the Raytheon
Corporation and the Air Force Research Laboratory as
both organizations have significant experience with
earlier ADT developments, vnu.com said.
The idea of developing energy-directed hand-weapons
to be able to inflict non-lethal and non-destructive
damage in guarding technologically complex installations
is not a new one.
In the mid 1990s the US Air
Force funded development of an ADT prototype which resulted
in several ongoing projects, such as the Joint Non-Lethal
Weapons Directorate's Vehicle Mounted Active Denial
System Force Transformation's project Sheriff program,
vnu.com said. [...]
The effects of the new technology promise to be far-reaching.
It could offer reliable non-lethal
force weapons that would prove invaluable in prison
security, riot control and even to beat cops.
[...] |
BEIJING - Unocal Corp has told
CNOOC Ltd it will consider withdrawing its backing for
a 16.5 bln usd bid by Chevron Corp in favour of the
Chinese company's 18.5 bln usd offer if it pledged to
meet a number of conditions, the Financial Times reported.
The newspaper, citing people close to the situation,
said the conditions include requests for divestments
and other demands from US regulators.
The paper said CNOOC and Unocal have been in negotiations
over the state-controlled group's landmark bid for the
last 10 days.
The US oil and gas group has set out what it would
take for the Chinese offer to be declared "superior"
to Chevron's.
Negotiations have also focused on specific pledges
CNOOC might be prepared to make to defuse US regulators'
concerns, the paper said.
The CNOOC bid, launched last month, was pitched at
a premium to Chevron's offer partly because of fears
Washington could block the Chinese group's takeover.
With the price of CNOOC's bid so far fixed at 67 usd
a share, the talks have turned to other details in the
merger agreement, such as a "material adverse change"
clause as well as the treatment of Unocal management,
employees and the pension plan.
People close to the situation warned that CNOOC had
not taken a final decision on whether to comply with
Unocal's requests. [...] |
JERUSALEM - Israeli troops overnight
arrested 10 Palestinians, including six suspected members
of the radical Islamic Jihad faction.
Three alleged Jihad militants were arrested in the
northern
West Bank city of Jenin during an Israeli incursion,
in which troops opened fire but no one was injured,
military sources said Friday.
Another three were picked up in the southern West Bank
city of Hebron, where another four Palestinians in possession
of hunting rifles were also arrested.
Late last month, Israeli troops detained well over
70 suspected Islamic Jihad members across the West Bank,
after the group claimed responsibility for a series
of attacks despite its allegiance to a de facto truce. |
MORANT BAY, Jamaica - Hurricane
Dennis swept away a bridge and peeled tin roofs off
homes in Haiti, killing at least five people as it strengthened
to a Category 4 storm and headed straight for Cuba.
Forecasters said it could reach the U.S. Gulf Coast
by Sunday.
The Hurricane Center in Miami said the eye was swirling
over water about 100 miles south of the Cuban coast
and moving to the northwest at about 15 miles an hour.
The hurricane's winds neared 135 mph as it sideswiped
Jamaica on Thursday. Forecasters predicted the
storm could hit the United States anywhere from Florida
to Louisiana by Sunday or Monday, raising fears that
oil production in the Gulf of Mexico would be disrupted
by the fourth storm in as many weeks.
Thunderstorms swept over the Dominican Republic, southern
Haiti and northeast Jamaica. The Cayman Islands and
Cuba were under hurricane warnings, including the U.S.
detention camp at Guantanamo Bay holding some 520 terror
suspects.
Hurricane Center forecasters warned the Sierra Maestra
Mountains in southeastern Cuba could get 15 inches of
rain, while Jamaica's coffee-producing Blue Mountains
could see 10 inches. Hurricane force winds reached 50
miles from eye and tropical storm force winds another
140 miles.
In the southwestern Haitian town of Grand Goave, an
Associated Press Television News reporter saw at least
four people killed when a wood and metal bridge collapsed.
Witnesses said the river came suddenly rushing over
the bridge.
Elsewhere on the dangerously deforested island, wind
gusts uprooted a palm tree and sent it into a mud hut,
killing a fifth person in the southern town of Les Cayes,
the Red Cross said. Many homes and roads in the south
were flooded, some by as much as three feet of water.
The Florida Keys were under
a hurricane warning Thursday and ordered tourists to
evacuate, and the southern Florida peninsula
was on tropical storm watch, expecting severe conditions
within 36 hours.
In Jamaica, Prime Minister Percival
Patterson urged people in low-lying areas to evacuate.
[...]
The hurricane center warned the eye could pass over
central Cuba sometime Friday afternoon. In the communist-run
island, where the military-style government has been
praised by the United Nations for its extensive hurricane
preparedness plans, more than 100,000 people had been
evacuated in the island's southeast, civil defense officials
said on state television.
There were no immediate plans to evacuate
detainees or troops from the U.S. detention center's
Camp Delta at Guantanamo Bay, located on Cuba's extreme
southeast end about 150 yards from the ocean, Gen. Jay
Hood said.
Troops put heavy steel shutters on sea-facing cell
windows as heavy surf sent splashes of salt spray over
the razor wire fence. Officials said Camp Delta was
built to withstand winds up to 90 mph. [...] |
LISBON - Hundreds of firefighters
were on Friday battling several wildfires in central
and northern Portugal which threatened homes and forced
the closure of several roads, including the nation's
busiest highway.
Five water-dropping aircraft and more than 200 firefighters
were at the scene of the biggest blaze near Albergaria-a-Velha,
some 250 kilometres north of Lisbon, emergency services
workers said.
The wildfire led local authorities to close a stretch
of the nation's main highway, linking Lisbon to second-city
Oporto in the north, for over seven hours because of
the heavy smoke and threat to vehicles from the flames.
Local residents scrambled to protect their homes by
using buckets of water and tree branches to put out
the flames, images on state television RTP showed.
"Firefighters have the fire in their hands, it
is getting controlled," the mayor of Albergaria-a-Velha,
Joao Agostinho, told the television station.
"We could have had a catastrophe here," he
added.
Firefighters suspect arsonists may be responsible for
the blaze, which erupted in the early hours of Friday
and was fueled by winds of up to 120 kilometres (75
miles) and hour, the mayor added.
Further north firefighters in the district of Oporto
were battling some 30 wildfires of various sizes.
The fires caused ashes to rain down on downtown Oporto,
private radio TSF reported.
Local officials said they had asked the army for help
in the battle against the wildfires, which come as Portugal
is facing its worst drought in decades.
Wildfires destroyed 21,504 hectares
(53,115 acres) of brush and forest during the first
six months of the year, compared with an average of
15,751 hectares during the past five years, agriculture
ministry figures show. |
Gulf of Mexico TX - An international
team of marine research scientists working for the Integrated
Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) have found new evidence
that links catastrophic sand avalanches in deep Gulf
waters to rapid sea level changes.
By analyzing downhole measurements and freshly retrieved
sediment cores, IODP scientists are reconstructing the
history of a basin formed approximately 20,000 years
ago, when sea level fell so low that the Texas shoreline
shifted almost 100 miles to the south.
The data are important to reconstructing
climate change history and gathering insights
about the development and placement of natural resources,
particularly gas and oil deposits.
"The basin we chose to study is the ultimate sink
of sediments transported by the Brazos and Trinity Rivers,"
explains cochief scientist Peter Flemings of Pennsylvania
State University's Geosciences Department.
"Over the last 120,000 years, the basin accumulated
enough sand and mud to cover the entire city of Houston
with a 20-foot thick layer."
During the last glacial period, sediments discharged
by rivers such as the Brazos and Trinity formed beaches
and deltas near the continental shelf's edge.
Catastrophic submarine sand avalanches, called turbidity
currents, carried the sediments into the deep-water
Gulf of Mexico, where they accumulated in bowl-shaped
basins.
Carlos Pirmez, a research geologist with Shell International
E&P in Houston and a member of the science party
explains, "Bowl-shaped basins such as the Brazos
Basin IV are now buried thousands of meters beneath
the Gulf of Mexico seafloor and host billions of barrels
of oil and gas. Sediment records we acquire from the
young basin off Texan shores will boost our understanding
of how deeply buried reservoirs are formed, and how
oil and gas can be drained from them more effectively."
Jan Behrmann, Fleming's cochief and a professor at
Germany's University of Freiburg emphasizes that, "The
goal of this expedition is not to explore or drill for
oil, which lies much deeper than the sediments we recovered.
But in the next several months, this science party will
analyze sediment samples and will gain understanding
of when and how turbidites form. We will then have a
better picture of why and where these important deposits
are formed."
The expedition scientists plan to obtain detailed measurements
of changes in sediment and fluid properties to enable
prediction of the mechanics of catastrophic underwater
flows known as turbidity currents.
These currents are akin to underwater
avalanches and carry large amounts of sand and mud in
suspension, sometimes for hundreds of miles, at speeds
up to 70 miles per hour near the seabed.
Sediments from these currents constitute an important
piece of evidence in the study of sea level and climate
change. Often, large petroleum reservoirs are found
in the porous and permeable turbidite sands in deep
water. |
A new research radar based in
Antarctica is giving scientists the chance to study
the highest layer of the earth's atmosphere at the very
edge of space.
Using the new radar, scientists will be able to investigate
climate change and explore the theory that while the
lower atmosphere is warming, the upper atmosphere is
cooling by as much as 1 degree centigrade each year.
They will also be able to find out more about the complex
waves, tides and other mechanisms that link this region
- known as the mesosphere - to the lower regions of
the atmosphere.
At heights of around 80-100km (50-62 miles) the mesosphere
is notoriously difficult to investigate and is the least-explored
part of the earth's atmosphere.
The low air pressure at this altitude means that it
is impossible to fly aircraft in the mesosphere and
even the huge weather balloons that are used to measure
stratospheric ozone cannot climb high enough to reach
this altitude.
Satellites begin to burn up when they enter the mesosphere,
so the new radar - just installed at the Rothera research
base in Antarctica in a joint project between the University
of Bath and the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) - will
help scientists explore the region using remote sensing.
"Fortunately, nature provides us with an excellent
answer to the problem of investigating the mesosphere,"
said Professor Nick Mitchell who heads the project in
the Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering
at the University of Bath.
"Meteors, or 'shooting stars', burn up in the
mesosphere. The meteors drift just like weather balloons
so we can use a radar on the Earth and bounce radio
waves off the meteors to find how fast they are moving
and so measure the winds at the edge of space.
"The fading of the radio echoes from the meteors
also lets us measure the temperature of the atmosphere.
We can detect thousands of meteors in any one day and
with this information study the waves and tides that
flow around the planet on a continuous basis.
"The mesosphere has been called the miner's canary
for climate change; meaning that it is very sensitive
and the changes there may be larger than in any other
part of the atmosphere.
"Evidence of these changes
comes from sightings of noctilucent clouds, very unusual
clouds seen only in polar regions and known to be in
the mesosphere. These clouds
don't seem to have been observed before 1885 and may
mark the onset of a long-term cooling of the upper atmosphere".
[...] |
Washington DC - A new study, funded
in part by the Naval Research Laboratory and the NASA
reports that exhaust from the space shuttle can create
high-altitude clouds over Antarctica mere days following
launch, providing valuable insight to global transport
processes in the lower thermosphere.
The same study also finds that the shuttle's main engine
exhaust plume carries small quantities of iron that
can be observed from the ground, half a world away.
The international team of authors of the study, which
appears in the July 6 issue of Geophysical Research
Letters, used the STS-107 Shuttle mission as a case
study to show that exhaust released in the lower thermosphere,
near 110 kilometers altitude, can form Antarctic polar
mesospheric clouds (PMCs).
The thermosphere is the highest layer in our atmosphere,
with the mesosphere (between 50-90 kilometers above
the Earth), stratosphere, and troposphere below.
New observations presented by the research team from
the Global Ultraviolet Imager (GUVI) on NASA's Thermosphere,
Ionosphere, Mesosphere, Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED)
satellite reveal transport of the STS-107 exhaust into
the southern hemisphere just two days after the January
2003 launch.
Water from the exhaust ultimately led to a significant
burst of PMCs during the 2002-2003 southern polar summer,
observed by the Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet (SBUV)
satellite experiment. The inter-hemispheric transport
followed by Antarctic PMC formation were unexpected.
PMCs, also known as noctilucent clouds, appear near
83 kilometers altitude and are made up of water ice
particles created through microphysical processes of
nucleation, condensation, and sedimentation.
They typically appear in the frigid polar summer mesosphere
where temperatures plummet below 130° Kelvin (-220°
F). Little is known about the specific processes that
lead to PMC formation.
According to the study's lead author, Dr. Michael Stevens,
a research physicist at the E.O. Hulburt Center for
Space Research at the Naval Research Laboratory, the
research produced multiple groundbreaking science results.
"This research is exciting in that it extends
a new explanation for the formation of these clouds
by demonstrating the global effect of a Shuttle exhaust
plume in a region of the atmosphere that has traditionally
not been well understood," said Stevens.
Some believe that the impact of anthropogenic change
in the lower atmosphere is reflected in these upper
atmospheric clouds.
Although historically PMCs have only been seen in the
polar region, in recent years PMCs have been spotted
at lower latitudes as far south as Colorado and Utah,
renewing interest and sparking debate on the implications.
However, the findings of this work,
"call into question the interpretation of the impact
of late 20th century PMC trends solely in terms of global
climate change," Stevens said.
The team concludes that the water from a space shuttle's
exhaust plume can contribute a remarkable 10-20 percent
to PMCs observed during one summer season in Antarctica.
A key piece of data that confirmed the plume's arrival
in Antarctica was the ground-based observation of iron
atoms near 110 km. The presence of iron at this altitude
originally perplexed scientists because there is no
known natural source there.
The data imply that iron ablated, or vaporized, by
the main engines of the Shuttle was transported along
with the water plume, arriving in Antarctica three to
four days after the January 2003 launch.
Both the water plume and the presence
of iron demonstrate that the mean southward wind inferred
from the team's data is much faster than gleaned from
global circulation models or wind climatologies.
"This tells us something new and exciting about
transport in this region of the atmosphere," said
Stevens.
"It can be so fast that a shuttle plume can form
ice over Antarctica before other loss processes can
really take effect. We must take great care in interpreting
the long-term implications to observations and features
of these clouds because of this contribution from the
shuttle and the potential contribution from many other
smaller launch vehicles." |
WICHITA (AP) - Confessed BTK serial killer Dennis
Rader made his first public apology for the murders
that horrified a community for a quarter-century, blaming
a ''demon'' that got inside him at a young age.
"I have a lot of remorse. I'm very sorry for them.
It is something I wouldn't want to happen to my family,"
he told KAKE-TV. The interview was conducted Saturday;
some of it was aired Wednesday night with additional
portions to air Thursday.
Rader, who pleaded guilty last week to 10 first-degree
murders in the Wichita area from 1974 to 1991, nicknamed
himself BTK, for "Bind, Torture, Kill," as
he taunted media and police with cryptic messages about
the crimes. He faces sentencing Aug. 17.
"I just know it's a dark side of me. It kind of
controls me. I personally think it's a - and I know
it is not very Christian - but I actually think it's
a demon that's within me. ... At some point and time
it entered me when I was very young," said Rader,
who was once president of his
Lutheran church.
Rader, 60, said his problems began in grade school,
with his sexual fantasies that were "just a little
bit weirder" than other people's.
"Somewhere along the line, someone
had to pick something up from me somewhere that there
was a problem," he said. "They should have
identified it."
Rader said he felt for Dale Fox when he saw him cry
on television while talking about the 1977 strangulation
of Fox's daughter Nancy - a crime Rader has admitted
- and said his own relatives also suffer.
"I am going to pay for it with a life sentence.
The final victims are my ... family," he said.
Rader told the court last week that sexual fantasies
drove him to kill. He told KAKE he was "totally
unprepared" for the court's request for details
of the crimes.
"I just wanted to get the facts out as quick as
I could, try to not get too emotionally involved,"
he said.
On Thursday, the family of Vicki Wegerle, who was killed
in 1986, filed a civil lawsuit seeking unspecified damages
against Rader - the second such action. A wrongful death
suit was filed last week by the family of Marine Hedge,
who was slain in 1985; that lawsuit is seeking more
than $150,000 in damages. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|